DOCSLIB.ORG

2014 Mojave Region Integrated Regional

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2014 Mojave Region Integrated Regional Final Mojave Region Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Photos Courtesy of Jim Quigg, Eyerly Dickerson, and Jerry Laursen Kennedy/Jenks Consultants June 2014 2775 North Ventura Road, Suite 100 Oxnard, California 93036 805-973-5700 805-973-1440 (Fax) Final Mojave Integrated Regional Water Management Plan June 2014 Prepared for Mojave Water Agency 22450 Headquarters Drive Apple Valley, CA 92345 K/J Project No. 1389002*00 Table of Contents List of Tables ..................................................................................................................................................................................... xiii List of Figures .................................................................................................................................................................................... xiv List of Appendices ............................................................................................................................................................................ xvi List of Acronyms ............................................................................................................................................................................. xvii Section 1: Introduction ............................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1.1 Formation of the IRWM Region .................................................................. 1-1 1.1.2 Regional Features ............................................................................................. 1-2 1.1.3 Primary Focal Points for the IRWM Plan ................................................ 1-6 1.1.4 Regional Water Management Group ........................................................ 1-6 1.1.4.1 Mojave Water Agency ............................................................. 1-7 1.1.4.2 Victor Valley Wastewater Reclamation Authority ...................................................................................... 1-8 1.1.4.3 MWA Technical Advisory Committee ............................... 1-8 1.1.4.4 Mojave Desert Resource Conservation District ............ 1-8 1.1.4.5 Morongo Basin Pipeline Commission ............................... 1-9 1.1.5 Coordinating Committee ............................................................................... 1-9 1.1.6 Existing IRWM Plans and Previous Planning Efforts ....................... 1-10 1.2 Stakeholder Involvement ........................................................................................... 1-11 1.2.1 Overview of Stakeholder Involvement Process ................................. 1-11 1.2.2 Stakeholders/Plan Participants ................................................................ 1-11 1.2.2.1 Municipal and County Governments .............................. 1 - 1 2 1.2.2.2 Wholesale and Retail Water Purveyors, Wastewater Agencies, Flood Management Agencies, and Other Special Districts ............................. 1-12 1.2.2.3 State and Federal Regulatory and Resource Agencies ...................................................................................... 1-14 1.2.2.4 Environmental Community ................................................ 1-15 1.2.2.5 Tribal Community ................................................................... 1-16 1.2.2.6 Disadvantaged Communities ............................................. 1-16 1.2.2.7 Wastewater Agencies ............................................................ 1-17 1.2.2.8 Electrical Corporations ......................................................... 1-17 1.2.2.9 Community Organizations .................................................. 1-18 1.2.2.10 Self-Supplied Water Users .................................................. 1-19 1.2.2.11 Industry Organizations ......................................................... 1-19 1.2.2.12 Others .......................................................................................... 1-19 1.2.3 Public Outreach Process .............................................................................. 1-20 1.2.3.1 Inclusive Planning Area Outreach .................................... 1-20 1.2.3.2 Disadvantaged Community Outreach ............................. 1-21 1.2.3.3 Tribal Outreach ........................................................................ 1-22 1.2.4 Interregional Coordination ......................................................................... 1-22 1.3 Plan Development ......................................................................................................... 1-23 1.3.1 Goals for the IRWM Planning Process .................................................... 1-23 Mojave IRWM Plan, Final June 2014 Page TOC-i f:\2013\1389002 00 01 & 02_mojavewateragency_irwmp\09-reports\draft sections\final\mojave_irwm plan_final_cp 06.19.14.doc Table of Contents (cont’d) 1.3.2 Plan Development Process ......................................................................... 1-24 1.3.2.1 Overview .................................................................................... 1-24 1.3.2.2 Topics for Engagement ......................................................... 1-25 1.3.2.3 Plan Section Development and Refinement ................. 1-25 1.4 Plan Organization .......................................................................................................... 1-26 1.5 Plan Adoption .................................................................................................................. 1-26 Section 2: Region Description .................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Introduction and Overview ......................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Physical Setting ................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.3 Land Use .............................................................................................................................. 2-3 2.4 Ecological Processes and Environmental Resources ........................................ 2-8 2.4.1 Sensitive Biological Resources .................................................................... 2-9 2.4.2 Wildlife Corridors ........................................................................................... 2-12 2.4.3 Areas of Ecological Significance in the Region ................................... 2-13 2.4.3.1 Areas of Critical Environmental Concern ..................... 2-13 2.4.3.2 Parks, Reserves and Wilderness Areas .......................... 2 - 1 9 2.5 Social and Cultural Characteristics......................................................................... 2-20 2.5.1 Demographics and Population .................................................................. 2-20 2.5.1.1 Population Projections ......................................................... 2-22 2.5.2 Economic Factors ........................................................................................... 2-23 2.5.3 Disadvantaged Communities ..................................................................... 2-24 2.5.4 Social and Cultural Values ........................................................................... 2-24 2.5.4.1 Maintenance of Agricultural Character .......................... 2-24 2.5.4.2 Cultural Resources ................................................................. 2-26 2.5.4.3 Maintenance of Recreational Opportunities ................ 2-26 2.5.4.4 Environmental Enhancement ............................................ 2-27 2.5.4.5 California Native American Tribes .................................. 2-27 2.6 Hydrologic Features ..................................................................................................... 2-28 2.6.1 Watersheds ....................................................................................................... 2-28 2.6.2 Groundwater Basins ...................................................................................... 2-29 2.6.2.1 Mojave River Groundwater Basin .................................... 2-30 2.6.2.2 Morongo Basin/Johnson Valley Area ............................. 2 - 3 2 2.6.2.3 Adjudication .............................................................................. 2-32 2.6.3 Geology ............................................................................................................... 2-35 2.7 Overview of Water Supplies ...................................................................................... 2-38 2.8 Water Related Infrastructure ................................................................................... 2-38 2.8.1 Retail Water Purveyors ................................................................................ 2-38 2.8.2 Mojave Region Infrastructure ................................................................... 2-39 2.9 Climate ............................................................................................................................... 2-40 2.9.1 Climate Change ................................................................................................ 2-41 2.10 Mojave Region Expansion Areas ............................................................................. 2-44 2.10.1 Twentynine Palms Area ............................................................................... 2-44 2.10.1.1
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Grand Canyon of the Mojave.” It Was Originally Called Cave Canyon, but Acquire the Current Name After the Railroad Stop of Afton Was Created at the West End
    Afton Canyon: Afton Canyon is often called “the Grand Canyon of the Mojave.” It was originally called Cave Canyon, but acquire the current name after the railroad stop of Afton was created at the west end. It’s one of the few places where the Mojave River flows above ground in places all year round. Vehicle access is permitted through most of the canyon, however no vehicles are allowed in the western end, where the “horseshoe” is and where the caves are located. This closed area is bypassed by taking the access road along the railroad tracks and driving through the Mojave River wash under the railroad tressel. At one time there was a train stop at Afton and a station. Afton Cemetery is located south of where the station once sat. There are five stone-covered mounds and wooden crosses. One of the burials has been identified as that of Jose Flores, born about 1882, died May 29, 1906. Flores was one of three men who arrived at Afton Station on an early-morning train hoping to be hired on. They were intoxicated and after attacking Section Foreman Robert Y. Williams, who was severely injured in the brawl, Flores was killed. The other two were wounded, one fatally. [John V. Richardson, Jr., San Bernardino County Museum Association Quarterly, Vol. 55, Number 4, 2010]. MojaveRd1West Pages 5, 6. GPS: 35.030936,-116.366846 Arbuckle Mine: A magnesite (magnesium) mine high up on the side of a cliff on the south side of Afton Canyon. A large piece of timber at the mine has "Arbuckle Mine 1894" carved into it.
    [Show full text]
  • MARCH 2012 by Richard D
    City of San Bernardino Historical and Pioneer Society P.O. Box 875, San Bernardino, CA 92402 LIBRARY NEWS MARCH 2012 By Richard D. Thompson, Librarian PIONEER “UNCLE GEORGE” LORD Last month I mentioned our intent to create a "big-book" on William F. Holcomb and his descendants. A big-book is a four- or five-inch-thick, heavy-duty ring binder filled with hundreds of pages of whatever can be found on the family. We have one on John Brown and one on Fred Perris. These are works in progress because there is much more material available than what we were able to collect within the restricted time and effort devoted to the project. A file on George Lord is now being gathered. He was the first president of the San Bernardino Society of California Pioneers, who, upon his death in 1898, was described in a Riverside newspaper as the "most famous man in southern California." Another article said "there was not a stain" in his life, and a third stated that "thousands" attended his funeral (the total population of the city was only about 6,000). I am still in the process of accumulating what is readily available on this man. This includes photographs, references in George Lord history books, newspaper articles and anything that can be found on the Internet. “Uncle George” Lord, as he was called, and his wife Arabella Singleton Lord had two sons and a daughter, the latter of whom died as a baby. The boys, George Lord, Jr., and John Singleton Lord, both had families, and I have included in the big-book what information I have on them, their wives and families.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Cultural Resources of the Western Mojave Desert
    BLM LIBRARY BURE/ IT 88014080 An Overview of the Cultural Resources of the Western Mojave Desert by E . G ary Stic kel and - L ois J . W einm an Ro berts with sections by Rainer Beig ei and Pare Hopa cultural resources publications anthropology— history Cover design represents a petroglyph element from Inscription Canyon, San Bernardino County, California. : AN OVERVIEW OF THE CULTURAL RESOURCES OF THE WESTERN TOJAVE DESERT by Gary Stickel and Lois J. Weinman- Roberts Environmental Research Archaeologists: A Scientific Consortium Los Angeles with sections by Rainer Berger and Pare Hopa BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT LIBRARY Denver, Colorado 88014680 Prepared for the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT California Desert Planning Program 3610 Central Avenue, Suite 402 Riverside, California 92506 Contract No. YA-512-CT8-106 ERIC W. RITTER GENERAL EDITOR Bureau of Land RIVERSIDE, CA Management Library 1980 Bldg. 50, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 *•' FOREWORD Culture resource overviews such as this bring together much of the available information on prehistoric and historic peoples and present- day Native American groups along with their associated environments. The purpose behind these studies is to provide background information for the management of and research into these prehistoric, historic, and contemporary resources. This overview is one of seven covering the southern California deserts undertaken as part of a comprehensive planning effort by the Bureau of Land Management for these deserts. Overviews aid in the day-to-day management of cultural resources and in the completion of environmental analyses and research projects. Its general value to the public in the fields of education and recreation-interpretation must also be stressed.
    [Show full text]
  • San Bernardino County California, U
    ADELANTO CITY SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CALIFORNIA, U. S. A. San Bernardino County. Condado de San Bernardino Officially the County of San Bernardino, is a county located in the Oficialmente, el Condado de San Bernardino, es un condado ubicado en la southern portion of the U.S. state of California, and is located within the parte sur del estado de California en los Estados Unidos, y se encuentra dentro Inland Empire area. As of the 2010 U.S. Census, the population was del área del Inland Empire. A partir del censo estadounidense de 2010, la 2,035,210, making it the fifth-most populous county in California and the población era de 2.035.210, lo que lo convierte en el quinto condado más 14th-most populous in the United States. The county seat is San Bernardino. poblado de California y el 14º más poblado de los Estados Unidos. La sede del condado es San Bernardino. While included within the Greater Los Angeles area, San Bernardino Si bien se incluye dentro del área metropolitana de Los Ángeles, el County is included in the Riverside–San Bernardino–Ontario metropolitan condado de San Bernardino se incluye en el área estadística metropolitana statistical area (also known as the Inland Empire), as well as the Los Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario (también conocida como Inland Empire), así Angeles–Long Beach combined statistical area. como el área estadística combinada Los Ángeles-Long Beach. With an area of 20,105 square miles (52,070 km2), San Bernardino Con un área de 20,105 millas cuadradas (52,070 km2), el condado de San County is the largest county in the United States by area, although some of Bernardino es el condado más grande de los Estados Unidos por área, aunque Alaska's boroughs and census areas are larger.
    [Show full text]
  • Keys Ranch: Where Time Stood Still
    National Park Service Teaching with Historic Places U.S. Department of the Interior Keys Ranch: Where Time Stood Still Keys Ranch: Where Time Stood Still (Photo by Harmon and Nelda King, National Park Service) In the high desert of California, flesh-colored boulders rise up out of the stark landscape and embrace a small valley where Keys Ranch stands. Strangely shaped trees cast long shadows on the sides of the simple wooden ranch structures. Animal tracks in the sand tell of the previous night's adventures when scorpions, kangaroo rats, snakes, and bobcats battled for survival. This seemingly hostile desert environment was settled much later than other more productive areas of the West. Yet it was here, in 1917, that Bill Keys chose to establish a ranch and raise a family. Keys and other 20th-century homesteaders lived much as earlier pioneers in the West had, working hard to make their marginal land holdings successful. Today, Keys Ranch is preserved as part of Joshua Tree National Park. National Park Service Teaching with Historic Places U.S. Department of the Interior Keys Ranch: Where Time Stood Still Document Contents National Curriculum Standards About This Lesson Getting Started: Inquiry Question Setting the Stage: Historical Context Locating the Site: Map 1. Map 1: Deserts of the Southwest 2. Map 2: Portion of Joshua Tree National Park Determining the Facts: Readings 1. Reading 1: Settling in the California Desert 2. Reading 2: Life on Keys Ranch 3. Reading 3: Excerpts from Emerson’s Essay “Self-Reliance” Visual Evidence: Images 1. Colorado Desert 2. Mojave Desert 3.
    [Show full text]
  • San Bernardino & Inyo Counties, California
    BLM-California Old Spanish National Historic Trail Recreation & Development Strategy San Bernardino & Inyo Counties, California—September, 2015 14 Old Spanish National Historic Trail Recreation & Development Strategy Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Utah State Office Prepared For: The Bureau of Land Management, Barstow Field Office The Old Spanish Trail Association Prepared By: Michael Knight, BLM, ACE Landscape Architect Intern Graydon Bascom, BLM, ACE Historic Trails Intern September, 2015 Contents Note to the Reader 1 Participants 2 Explanation of Document Sections 3 Project Overview Old Spanish Trail Map 7 Recreation Route Map 9 Typical Trail Elements 11 Trail Zone Details Cajon Junction to Barstow (Zone 1) 15 Barstow to Harvard Rd (Zone 2) 19 Harvard Rd to Salt Creek (Zone 3) 27 Zzyzx to Piute Gorge (Zone 4) 31 Salt Creek to California State Line (Zone 5) 37 Summary 41 Above: Old Spanish Trail Marker at Emigrant Pass Cover Page: Top photo: Salt Creek ACEC, Bottom Photo: Mouth of Spanish Canyon looking southwest Note To The Reader National Historic Trails are trails that have a historical significance to the nation, and can only be designated by an act of Congress. There are currently 19 National Historic Trails in the United States. In 1968, the National Trails System Act, which is intended to provide for the outdoor recreation needs of the public, opened the door to federal involvement in all types of trails. Today, the Bureau of Land Management, along with the National Park Service and National Forest Service, are responsible for the administration and management of National Historic Trails.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E: Cultural Resources Technical Report
    SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYWIDE PLAN DRAFT PEIR COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Appendices Appendix E: Cultural Resources Technical Report June 2019 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYWIDE PLAN DRAFT PEIR COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Appendices This page intentionally left blank. PlaceWorks CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYWIDE PLAN, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FEBRUARY 2019 PREPARED FOR PlaceWorks PREPARED BY SWCA Environmental Consultants E-1 E-2 CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYWIDE PLAN, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for PlaceWorks 3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100 Santa Ana, California 92707 Attn: Colin Drukker Prepared by Alex Wesson, B.A., Chris Millington, M.A., RPA and Nicole Kromarek, B.A. SWCA Environmental Consultants 51 W. Dayton Street Pasadena, California 91105 (626) 240-0587 www.swca.com Contact: Chris Millington, Project Manager SWCA Project No. 31474 SWCA Cultural Resources Report No. 18-270 February 2019 E-3 This page intentionally left blank. E-4 Cultural Resource Technical Report for the San Bernardino Countywide Plan, San Bernardino County, California EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Purpose and Scope: In support of the forthcoming San Bernardino Countywide Plan, PlaceWorks retained SWCA Environmental Consultants (SWCA) to summarize the existing conditions of cultural resources within the study area, evaluate potential impacts that could occur to these resources because of the Countywide Plan, and to provide mitigation measures for potential impacts. The study area is composed of all unincorporated lands that are subject to the County of San Bernardino’s land use jurisdiction; also referred to as the “County Control Area,” the study area is approximately 1,623,988 acres (2,537 square miles) in area, or 12.627 percent of the approximately 12,861,026-acre (20,105- square mile) county.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Spanish National Historic Trail Final Comprehensive Administrative Strategy
    Old Spanish National Historic Trail Final Comprehensive Administrative Strategy Chama Crossing at Red Rock, New Mexico U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service - National Trails Intermountain Region Bureau of Land Management - Utah This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents Old Spanish National Historic Trail - Final Comprehensive Administrative Stratagy Table of Contents i Table of Contents v Executive Summary 1 Chapter 1 - Introduction 3 The National Trails System 4 Old Spanish National Historic Trail Feasibility Study 4 Legislative History of the Old Spanish National Historic Trail 5 Nature and Purpose of the Old Spanish National Historic Trail 5 Trail Period of Significance 5 Trail Significance Statement 7 Brief Description of the Trail Routes 9 Goal of the Comprehensive Administrative Strategy 10 Next Steps and Strategy Implementation 11 Chapter 2 - Approaches to Administration 13 Introduction 14 Administration and Management 17 Partners and Trail Resource Stewards 17 Resource Identification, Protection, and Monitoring 19 National Historic Trail Rights-of-Way 44 Mapping and Resource Inventory 44 Partnership Certification Program 45 Trail Use Experience 47 Interpretation/Education 47 Primary Interpretive Themes 48 Secondary Interpretive Themes 48 Recreational Opportunities 49 Local Tour Routes 49 Health and Safety 49 User Capacity 50 Costs 50 Operations i Table of Contents Old Spanish National Historic Trail - Final Comprehensive Administrative Stratagy Table of Contents 51 Funding 51 Gaps in Information and
    [Show full text]
  • Extensions of Remarks
    September 29, 1987 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 25653 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS NEED FOR A DOLLAR COIN handicapped, but would remove various and each purchase would subtract an incre­ hidden costs of the outmoded dollar bill. ment. The installation cost is estimated at a It would also be a sensible acknowledg­ minimum of $750 per machine. As is the HON. MORRIS K. UDALL ment of inflation. In the past 30 years, the case with subway tokens and travelers' OF ARIZONA Consumer Price Index has risen from 84.3 checks, the seller of debit cards would have IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES to 338.7, a four-fold increase. Today's dollar the use of the cash for goods and services Tuesday, September 29, 1987 is the quarter of the 1950s. In the Eisenhow­ not yet consumed; and of course the cost of er years, a buck would buy hamburgers, machine changes would eventually be borne Mr. UDALL. Mr. Speaker, there is ample evi­ french fries and soft drinks for two at by the customer. dence suggesting a need for a new dollar McDonald's or Cokes for an entire baseball In addition, without prompt currency coin. Merchants, vending machine manufac­ team. Today, it is no longer the threshold of reform many more mass-transit authorities turers, and metropolitan transit authorities a moderate purchase. will be forced to follow the example of the Moreover, a dollar coin would remove nu­ Cleveland, Washington and Chicago sys­ have long known that inflation and consumer merous inconveniences from modern life. habits render the dollar bill outdated.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pueblo in the Mojave Sink: an Archaeological Myth
    California State University, San Bernardino CSUSB ScholarWorks Theses Digitization Project John M. Pfau Library 2002 The pueblo in the Mojave Sink: An archaeological myth Barbara Ann Loren-Webb Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Loren-Webb, Barbara Ann, "The pueblo in the Mojave Sink: An archaeological myth" (2002). Theses Digitization Project. 2107. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project/2107 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the John M. Pfau Library at CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses Digitization Project by an authorized administrator of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE PUEBLO IN THE MOJAVE SINK: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL MYTH A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Masters of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies by Barbara Ann Loren-Webb March 2003 THE PUEBLO IN THE MOJAVE SINK: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL MYTH A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino by Barbara Ann Loren-Webb March 2003 Approved by: Russell Barber, Chair, Anthropology Date Pete Robertshesw, Anthropology ABSTRACT In 1929 Malcolm Rogers published a paper in which he stated that there was evidence of an Anasazi or Puebloan settlement or pueblo, in the Mojave Sink Region of the Mojave Desert. Since then, archaeologists have cited Rogers' publication and repeated his claim that such a pueblo was located in the Western Mojave Desert. The purpose of this thesis started out as a review of the existing evidence and to locate this pueblo.
    [Show full text]
  • At Joshua Tree Nafional Park Course Catalog Spring 2018
    Desert Institute at Joshua Tree National Park Course Catalog Spring 2018 Welcome to Desert Institute at Joshua Tree National Park It is hard to believe that it was almost 20 years ago that the Joshua Tree National Park Association be- gan a unique experiment to find a way to connect people who were passionate about their park with some of the finest educators in the Southland. The Desert Institute was born to provide the in-depth knowledge that so many of our annual visitors and local residents were clamoring for: day-long classes that go beyond the basics and really immerse the learners in the natural and cultural history that make Joshua Tree such a special place. I remember working here as a journeymen ranger when the first classes were offered back in 1998. That first year, we offered five weekend classes on natural history. Who would have dreamed that twenty years later we would be offering dozens of courses that span the spectrum from desert cooking to smart phone photography to bighorn sheep habitat? One of the exciting new offerings is the Joshua Tree Master Naturalist certificate program. Students who take classes for college credit can also be enrolled in a certification program that is invaluable for educators, naturalists, and guides. What will the next 20 years bring? With your help and feedback, I’m looking forward to this program evolving to continue to meet the changing needs and passions of all of us who are excited to learn about the incredible place we have chosen to call home.
    [Show full text]
  • Joshua Tree National Park, California
    I 29.79/3: J 78 General Management Plan Development Concept Plans Environmental Impact Statement PUBLIC DOCI iMENTS DEPO° : "- • '7cM AUG 7 1995 Clliu . *\i LIBRARY JOSHUA TREE National Park • California V ® Printed on Recycled Paper Final General Management Plan Development Concept Plans Environmental Impact Statement Joshua Tree National Park Riverside and San Bernardino Counties, California On October 31, 1994, Public Law 103-433 added 234,000 acres to the Joshua Tree National Monument and changed its status from national monument to national park. The land that was added by the legislation is mainly adjacent to backcountry and wilderness areas. It is largely undeveloped and its management will be addressed in the wilderness and backcountry management plan currently being developed, which will serve as an amendment to this plan. This general management plan addresses only the land that was included prior to the 1994 legislation. This General Management Plan / Development Concept Plans / Environmental Impact Statement was prepared in order to offer a proposal and two alternatives for the management, use, and development of Joshua Tree National Park. In this plan, which affects mainly the developed areas of the park, the proposal calls for a change of management and use to more adequately protect and interpret significant resources. The proposed action would result in an increased visitor awareness of opportunities and a broader range of visitor choices and experiences. Visitor contact facilities and services would be provided at each of the three main park entrances. Interpretive programs and the system of wayside exhibits would be expanded. Resource management programs would also be increased.
    [Show full text]