DOCSLIB.ORG

Europe in Space Security

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Europe in Space Security EUROPE’S ACTIVITIES IN SPACE SECURITY DIMENSIONS, FROM INITIAL DRIVERS TO CURRENT EFFORTS CENAN AL-EKABI ESPI Resident Fellow EUROPE’S ACTIVITIES IN SPACE - SECURITY DIMENSIONS, FROM INITIAL DRIVERS TO CURRENT EFFORTS CENAN AL-EKABI, 27 Nov. 2017 _____________________________________________________________________________ EUROPE’S ACTIVITIES IN SPACE CONTENTS • Introduction - The European Space Policy Institute • The Evolution of Europe’s Launcher and Flagship Space Initiatives • Current Security Related Developments in the Space Sector © ESPI 2017 WWW.ESPI.OR.AT PAGE 2 EUROPE’S ACTIVITIES IN SPACE - SECURITY DIMENSIONS, FROM INITIAL DRIVERS TO CURRENT EFFORTS CENAN AL-EKABI, 27 Nov. 2017 _____________________________________________________________________________ THE EUROPEAN SPACE POLICY INSTITUTE (ESPI) Mission Statement The European Space Policy Institute (ESPI) provides decision-makers with an informed view on mid- to long-term issues relevant to Europe’s space activities. In this context, ESPI acts as an independent platform for developing positions and strategies. ESPI provides decision-makers and the global space community with: ● Arguments underpinning the “Case for Space” ● Policy concepts for international, regional and national activities ● Analyses for mid-term visions ● Platforms for expert exchanges ● Source for cutting-edge information © ESPI 2017 WWW.ESPI.OR.AT PAGE 3 EUROPE’S ACTIVITIES IN SPACE - SECURITY DIMENSIONS, FROM INITIAL DRIVERS TO CURRENT EFFORTS CENAN AL-EKABI, 27 Nov. 2017 _____________________________________________________________________________ ESPI GOVERNANCE 2003 established as a European think tank by a decision of the Member States of ESA 2004 set up as an association under Austrian law in Vienna ESPI Members Advisory Council ESPI Partners Founding Members - Genevieve Fioraso - Gerd Gruppe - Pavel Kabat - Sergio Marchisio Members - Dominique Tilmans - Ene Ergma - Ingolf Schädler - Gilles Maquet - Jaime Silva - Per Tegnér European Space Policy Research and Academic Network (ESPRAN) coordinated by ESPI Supported by © ESPI 2017 WWW.ESPI.OR.AT PAGE 4 EUROPE’S ACTIVITIES IN SPACE - SECURITY DIMENSIONS, FROM INITIAL DRIVERS TO CURRENT EFFORTS CENAN AL-EKABI, 27 Nov. 2017 _____________________________________________________________________________ ESPI PRODUCTS AND ASSIGNMENTS Assignments Yearbook on Reports Space Policy ESPI Coordination of ESPRAN Executive Briefs (European Space Policy Studies in Research and Academic Space Policy Network) ESPI Perspectives Position Papers and Memoranda Conferences Support for EISC (European Interparliamentary Space Conference) Information Resources Specials © ESPI 2017 WWW.ESPI.OR.AT PAGE 5 EUROPE’S ACTIVITIES IN SPACE - SECURITY DIMENSIONS, FROM INITIAL DRIVERS TO CURRENT EFFORTS CENAN AL-EKABI, 27 Nov. 2017 _____________________________________________________________________________ ESPI ONLINE Visit our website: www.espi.or.at Follow us on Facebook facebook.com/EuropeanSpacePolicyInstitute Twitter @ESPIspace YouTube youtube.com/ESPIfilm Linkedin linkedin.com/company/european-space-policy-institute © ESPI 2017 WWW.ESPI.OR.AT PAGE 6 EUROPE’S ACTIVITIES IN SPACE - SECURITY DIMENSIONS, FROM INITIAL DRIVERS TO CURRENT EFFORTS CENAN AL-EKABI, 27 Nov. 2017 _____________________________________________________________________________ BACKGROUND INFORMATION Name: Cenan Al-Ekabi (Canadian) Publications Books Professional Background 2012–2017 Resident Fellow, ESPI, Vienna, Austria 2011 Research Intern, ESPI, Vienna, Austria Yearbook on Space Policy 2016 2008 Legal Intern, Vernon | David Law Firm, Bucharest, Romania Space for Sustainable 2002–2006 Marine Engineering Systems Operator, Canadian Forces Development Naval Reserves, Canada Cenan Al-Ekabi Stefano Ferretti 2003 Operations Agent - Level 2, Bank of Canada – Operations – Editors TAOC, Canada Professional Licences Reports July 2014 New York State Bar law licence, New York, USA Space Exploration Academic Background Benefit Assessment 2016 ISU SSP16, Haifa, Israel (Support role, 2010-2011 Advanced LL.M. in Air & Space Law, Leiden University, delivered to ESA) Netherlands 2009-2010 Advanced LL.M. in European & International Business Law, Leiden University, Netherlands 2006-2009 J.D., Cooley Law School, Michigan, USA Perspectives External Publications (ISU) 2000-2005 B.A. Political Science, McMaster University, Canada ISU Team ISU Team Project Project Starport 1 Starport 1 Full Executive Report Summary © ESPI 2017 WWW.ESPI.OR.AT PAGE 7 EUROPE’S ACTIVITIES IN SPACE - SECURITY DIMENSIONS, FROM INITIAL DRIVERS TO CURRENT EFFORTS CENAN AL-EKABI, 27 Nov. 2017 _____________________________________________________________________________ EUROPE’S ACTIVITIES IN SPACE The Evolution of Europe’s Launcher and Flagship Space Initiatives • European launcher development leading up to the Ariane 6 • European Earth observation initiatives leading to Copernicus • European navigation initiatives leading to Galileo • Global space expenditure • Trends in space defence spending • Current security challenges in the space domain © ESPI 2017 WWW.ESPI.OR.AT PAGE 8 EUROPE’S ACTIVITIES IN SPACE - SECURITY DIMENSIONS, FROM INITIAL DRIVERS TO CURRENT EFFORTS CENAN AL-EKABI, 27 Nov. 2017 _____________________________________________________________________________ EUROPEAN LAUNCHER DEVELOPMENT Origins from World War II • Germany developed the A-4 rocket (renamed V-2 rocket), which could reach an altitude of 85 km at 5,000 km/hr. Post WWII – Cold War period • The US and Soviet Union rapidly developed their missile/launcher capability with researchers and technicians that were involved in the A-4 programme. • In Europe, still recovering from WWII and in the shadow of war, slower to develop launcher capabilities. • Diamant: In the 1960s, France developed the Diamant launcher for independent access to space. France was the first European country to successfully place a small satellite into orbit; but not suitable to launch larger communications satellites. • Blue Streak: In the 1950s-60s, the United Kingdom (in collaboration with the US) developed the Blue Streak IRBM. • Wanted to repurpose it into a medium-to-large satellite launcher • Led to the creation of the European Launcher Development Organisation (ELDO) (1962) © ESPI 2017 WWW.ESPI.OR.AT PAGE 9 EUROPE’S ACTIVITIES IN SPACE - SECURITY DIMENSIONS, FROM INITIAL DRIVERS TO CURRENT EFFORTS CENAN AL-EKABI, 27 Nov. 2017 _____________________________________________________________________________ THE EUROPA LAUNCH SYSTEM ELDO’s Europa1 launcher • 1st stage: the UK “Blue Streak” rocket • 2nd stage: France’s “Coralie” rocket • 3rd stage: Germany’s “Astris” rocket • Italy provided the first series of satellite test vehicles • Belgium provided the down range ground guidance stations • The Netherlands provided the long-range telemetry links • Australia’s contribution was its Woomera launch site • Failure partly due to conflicting economic and political priorities of ELDO member states © ESPI 2017 WWW.ESPI.OR.AT PAGE 10 EUROPE’S ACTIVITIES IN SPACE - SECURITY DIMENSIONS, FROM INITIAL DRIVERS TO CURRENT EFFORTS CENAN AL-EKABI, 27 Nov. 2017 _____________________________________________________________________________ EUROPE’S AUTONOMOUS ACCESS TO SPACE The Need for Independent Access to Space • In the 1970s, France and Germany jointly developed the two-communication satellites project “Symphonie”, which was intended for launch on the failed Europa 2 launcher. • Lacking a domestic launch provider, France and Germany turned to the US to launch the Symphonie telecommunication satellites, which agreed to do so requiring it to be used only for experimental purposes, not commercial. • This spurred Europe’s efforts towards autonomous access to space, as its absence had hindered Europe’s entry into the very profitable field of satellite communication. • The European Space Agency (ESA) formed shortly afterward out of ELDO and ESRO. With the experience gained in developing the Europa and Diamant launch systems, France led the effort in developing the new Ariane 1 launch system (paying 60% of the costs plus any cost overruns). © ESPI 2017 WWW.ESPI.OR.AT PAGE 11 EUROPE’S ACTIVITIES IN SPACE - SECURITY DIMENSIONS, FROM INITIAL DRIVERS TO CURRENT EFFORTS CENAN AL-EKABI, 27 Nov. 2017 _____________________________________________________________________________ THE ARIANE LAUNCH FAMILY From Left to Right (© ESA) Ariane 1: 1850 kg to GTO Earlier Generations Operational Next Generation (9 in 11 launches successful; from 1979 to 1986) Ariane 2: 2175 kg to GTO (5 in 6 launches successful; from 1986 to 1989) Ariane 3: 2700 kg to GTO (10 in 11 launches successful; from 1984 to 1989) Ariane 4: 2000 kg - 4300 kg to GTO (6 variants) (113 in 116 launches successful; from 1988 to 2003) Ariane 5: 6,100 kg (GS) / 10,865 kg (ECA) to GTO Currently in operation (dual-launch capability) (91 in 95 launches successes; from 1996 to current) Ariane 6: future launch system (agreed upon at the December 2014 ESA ministerial council meeting – industry-led development) © ESPI 2017 WWW.ESPI.OR.AT PAGE 12 EUROPE’S ACTIVITIES IN SPACE - SECURITY DIMENSIONS, FROM INITIAL DRIVERS TO CURRENT EFFORTS CENAN AL-EKABI, 27 Nov. 2017 _____________________________________________________________________________ ESA’S CURRENT FAMILY OF LAUNCH VEHICLES From Left to Right (© ESA) Vega: 1,400 kg to LEO – small launcher (11 in 11 launches successful; from 2012 to today) Soyuz at CSG: 3,250 kg to GTO – medium launcher (16 in 17 launches successful; from
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Project Number: JMW-USC1
    Project Number: JMW-USC1 Department of Social Science and Policy Studies THE FUTURE OF UNMANNED SPACE: A SPECULATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE COMMERCIAL MARKET An Interactive Qualifying Project Report: Submitted to the Faculty of the WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science by ______________________________ Peter Brayshaw ______________________________ Brooks Farnham ______________________________ Jon Leslie December 16, 2004 _____________________________ ________________________________ Professor John M. Wilkes, Advisor Professor Peter Campisano, Co-Advisor Abstract: This report is one of many which deal with the unmanned space race. It is a prediction of who will have the greatest competitive advantage in the commercial market over the next 25 years, based on historical analogy. Background information on Russia, China, Japan, the United States and the European Space Agency, including the launch vehicles and launch services each provides, is covered. The new prospect of space platforms is also investigated. 2 Table of Contents Abstract: ...................................................................................................... 2 Table of Contents ......................................................................................... 3 Introduction ................................................................................................. 5 Literature Review ...................................................................................... 5 Project
    [Show full text]
  • The Wittelsbach-Graff and Hope Diamonds: Not Cut from the Same Rough
    THE WITTELSBACH-GRAFF AND HOPE DIAMONDS: NOT CUT FROM THE SAME ROUGH Eloïse Gaillou, Wuyi Wang, Jeffrey E. Post, John M. King, James E. Butler, Alan T. Collins, and Thomas M. Moses Two historic blue diamonds, the Hope and the Wittelsbach-Graff, appeared together for the first time at the Smithsonian Institution in 2010. Both diamonds were apparently purchased in India in the 17th century and later belonged to European royalty. In addition to the parallels in their histo- ries, their comparable color and bright, long-lasting orange-red phosphorescence have led to speculation that these two diamonds might have come from the same piece of rough. Although the diamonds are similar spectroscopically, their dislocation patterns observed with the DiamondView differ in scale and texture, and they do not show the same internal strain features. The results indicate that the two diamonds did not originate from the same crystal, though they likely experienced similar geologic histories. he earliest records of the famous Hope and Adornment (Toison d’Or de la Parure de Couleur) in Wittelsbach-Graff diamonds (figure 1) show 1749, but was stolen in 1792 during the French T them in the possession of prominent Revolution. Twenty years later, a 45.52 ct blue dia- European royal families in the mid-17th century. mond appeared for sale in London and eventually They were undoubtedly mined in India, the world’s became part of the collection of Henry Philip Hope. only commercial source of diamonds at that time. Recent computer modeling studies have established The original ancestor of the Hope diamond was that the Hope diamond was cut from the French an approximately 115 ct stone (the Tavernier Blue) Blue, presumably to disguise its identity after the that Jean-Baptiste Tavernier sold to Louis XIV of theft (Attaway, 2005; Farges et al., 2009; Sucher et France in 1668.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tubesat Launch Vehicle
    TubeSat and NEPTUNE 30 Orbital Rocket Programs Personal Satellites Are GO! Interorbital Systems www.interorbital.com About Interorbital Corporation Founded in 1996 by Randa and Roderick Milliron, incorporated in 2001 Located at the Mojave Spaceport in Mojave, California 98.5% owned by R. and R. Milliron 1.5% owned by Eric Gullichsen Initial Starting Technology Pressure-fed liquid rocket engines Initial Mission Low-cost orbital and interplanetary launch vehicle development Facilities 6,000 square-foot research and development facility Two rocket engine test sites at the Mojave Spaceport Expert engineering and manufacturing team Interorbital Systems www.interorbital.com Core Technical Team Roderick Milliron: Chief Designer Lutz Kayser: Primary Technical Consultant Eric Gullichsen: Guidance and Control Gerard Auvray: Telecommunications Engineer Donald P. Bennett: Mechanical Engineer David Silsbee: Electronics Engineer Joel Kegel: Manufacturing/Engineering Tech Jacqueline Wein: Manufacturing/Engineering Tech Reinhold Ziegler: Space-Based Power Systems E. Mark Shusterman,M.D. Medical Life Support Randa Milliron: High-Temperature Composites Interorbital Systems www.interorbital.com Key Hardware Built In-House Propellant Tanks: Combining state-of-the-art composite technology with off-the-shelf aluminum liners Advanced Guidance Hardware and Software Ablative Rocket Engines and Components GPRE 0.5KNFA Rocket Engine Test Manned Space Flight Training Systems Rocket Injectors, Valves Systems, and Other Metal components Interorbital Systems www.interorbital.com Project History Pressure-Fed Rocket Engines GPRE 2.5KLMA Liquid Oxygen/Methanol Engine: Thrust = 2,500 lbs. GPRE 0.5KNFA WFNA/Furfuryl Alcohol (hypergolic): Thrust = 500 lbs. GPRE 0.5KNHXA WFNA/Turpentine (hypergolic): Thrust = 500 lbs. GPRE 3.0KNFA WFNA/Furfuryl Alcohol (hypergolic): Thrust = 3,000 lbs.
    [Show full text]
  • European Space Surveillance and Tracking
    2ndEuropean EU SST Webinar: Space Operations in Space Surveillance and Tracking 16Surveillance November 2020 –and14h CETTracking The EU SST activities received funding from the European Union programmes, notably from the Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreements No 760459, No 785257, No 713630, No 713762 and No 634943, and the Copernicus and Galileo programme under grant agreements No 299/G/GRO/COPE/19/11109, No 237/GRO/COPE/16/8935 and No 203/G/GRO/COPE/15/7987. This Portal reflects only the SST Cooperation’s actions and the European Commission and the Research Executive Agency are not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains. 2nd EU SST Webinar Operations in Space Surveillance and Tracking Speakers Pascal María Antonia Cristina Florian João FAUCHER (CNES) RAMOS (CDTI) PÉREZ (CDTI) DELMAS (CNES) ALVES (EU SatCen) Pier Luigi Lt. Moreno Juan Christophe Rodolphe RIGHETTI PERONI (IT MoD) ESCALANTE MORAND (EEAS) MUÑOZ (EUMETSAT) (EC – DG ECHO) (EC-DG DEFIS) 2nd EU SST Webinar: Operations in Space Surveillance and Tracking 16 November 2020 3 Agenda (1/2) 14h00-14h10: Welcome to the 2nd EU SST Webinar [Moderator: Mr Oliver Rajan (EU SatCen)] 14h10-14h50: SST Support Framework: Safeguarding European space infrastructure • Overview, governance model, security relevance and future perspectives [SST Cooperation Chair: Dr Pascal Faucher (CNES)] EU SST Architecture & Service Provision Model • Sensors network • Database and Catalogue precursor • Services [Chair of the SST Technical Committee:
    [Show full text]
  • Design by Contract: the Lessons of Ariane
    . Editor: Bertrand Meyer, EiffelSoft, 270 Storke Rd., Ste. 7, Goleta, CA 93117; voice (805) 685-6869; [email protected] several hours (at least in earlier versions of Ariane), it was better to let the computa- tion proceed than to stop it and then have Design by to restart it if liftoff was delayed. So the SRI computation continues for 50 seconds after the start of flight mode—well into the flight period. After takeoff, of course, this com- Contract: putation is useless. In the Ariane 5 flight, Object Technology however, it caused an exception, which was not caught and—boom. The exception was due to a floating- point error during a conversion from a 64- The Lessons bit floating-point value, representing the flight’s “horizontal bias,” to a 16-bit signed integer: In other words, the value that was converted was greater than what of Ariane can be represented as a 16-bit signed inte- ger. There was no explicit exception han- dler to catch the exception, so it followed the usual fate of uncaught exceptions and crashed the entire software, hence the onboard computers, hence the mission. This is the kind of trivial error that we Jean-Marc Jézéquel, IRISA/CNRS are all familiar with (raise your hand if you Bertrand Meyer, EiffelSoft have never done anything of this sort), although fortunately the consequences are usually less expensive. How in the world everal contributions to this made up of respected experts from major department have emphasized the European countries, which produced a How in the world could importance of design by contract report in hardly more than a month.
    [Show full text]
  • Telecommunikation Satellites: the Actual Situation and Potential Future Developments
    Telecommunikation Satellites: The Actual Situation and Potential Future Developments Dr. Manfred Wittig Head of Multimedia Systems Section D-APP/TSM ESTEC NL 2200 AG Noordwijk [email protected] March 2003 Commercial Satellite Contracts 25 20 15 Europe US 10 5 0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 European Average 5 Satellites/Year US Average 18 Satellites/Year Estimation of cumulative value chain for the Global commercial market 1998-2007 in BEuro 35 27 100% 135 90% 80% 225 Spacecraft Manufacturing 70% Launch 60% Operations Ground Segment 50% Services 40% 365 30% 20% 10% 0% 1 Consolidated Turnover of European Industry Commercial Telecom Satellite Orders 2000 30 2001 25 2002 3 (7) Firm Commercial Telecom Satellite Orders in 2002 Manufacturer Customer Satellite Astrium Hispasat SA Amazonas (Spain) Boeing Thuraya Satellite Thuraya 3 Telecommunications Co (U.A.E.) Orbital Science PT Telekommunikasi Telkom-2 Indonesia Hangar Queens or White Tails Orders in 2002 for Bargain Prices of already contracted Satellites Manufacturer Customer Satellite Alcatel Space New Indian Operator Agrani (India) Alcatel Space Eutelsat W5 (France) (1998 completed) Astrium Hellas-Sat Hellas Sat Consortium Ltd. (Greece-Cyprus) Commercial Telecom Satellite Orders in 2003 Manufacturer Customer Satellite Astrium Telesat Anik F1R 4.2.2003 (Canada) Planned Commercial Telecom Satellite Orders in 2003 SES GLOBAL Three RFQ’s: SES Americom ASTRA 1L ASTRA 1K cancelled four orders with Alcatel Space in 2001 INTELSAT Launched five satellites in the last 13 month average fleet age: 11 Years of remaining life PanAmSat No orders expected Concentration on cash flow generation Eutelsat HB 7A HB 8 expected at the end of 2003 Telesat Ordered Anik F1R from Astrium Planned Commercial Telecom Satellite Orders in 2003 Arabsat & are expected to replace Spacebus 300 Shin Satellite (solar-array steering problems) Korea Telecom Negotiation with Alcatel Space for Koreasat Binariang Sat.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade Studies Towards an Australian Indigenous Space Launch System
    TRADE STUDIES TOWARDS AN AUSTRALIAN INDIGENOUS SPACE LAUNCH SYSTEM A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Engineering by Gordon P. Briggs B.Sc. (Hons), M.Sc. (Astron) School of Engineering and Information Technology, University College, University of New South Wales, Australian Defence Force Academy January 2010 Abstract During the project Apollo moon landings of the mid 1970s the United States of America was the pre-eminent space faring nation followed closely by only the USSR. Since that time many other nations have realised the potential of spaceflight not only for immediate financial gain in areas such as communications and earth observation but also in the strategic areas of scientific discovery, industrial development and national prestige. Australia on the other hand has resolutely refused to participate by instituting its own space program. Successive Australian governments have preferred to obtain any required space hardware or services by purchasing off-the-shelf from foreign suppliers. This policy or attitude is a matter of frustration to those sections of the Australian technical community who believe that the nation should be participating in space technology. In particular the provision of an indigenous launch vehicle that would guarantee the nation independent access to the space frontier. It would therefore appear that any launch vehicle development in Australia will be left to non- government organisations to at least define the requirements for such a vehicle and to initiate development of long-lead items for such a project. It is therefore the aim of this thesis to attempt to define some of the requirements for a nascent Australian indigenous launch vehicle system.
    [Show full text]
  • Loral Space & Communications Inc
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Form 10-K ; ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 OR TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Commission file number 1-14180 LORAL SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC. (Exact name of registrant specified in the charter) Jurisdiction of incorporation: Delaware IRS identification number: 87-0748324 600 Third Avenue New York, New York 10016 (Address of principal executive offices) Telephone: (212) 697-1105 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered Common stock, $.01 par value NASDAQ Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Indicate by check mark if the registrant is well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No ; Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No ; Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ;No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
    [Show full text]
  • Study of a 100Kwe Space Reactor for Exploration Missions
    Preliminary study of a 100 kWe space reactor concept for exploration missions Elisa CLIQUET, Jean-Marc RUAULT 1), Jean-Pierre ROUX, Laurent LAMOINE, Thomas RAMEE 2), Christine POINOT-SALANON, Alexey LOKHOV, Serge PASCAL 3) 1) CNES Launchers Directorate,Evry, France 2) AREVA TA, Aix en Provence, France 3) CEA DEN/DM2S, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France NETS 2011 Overview ■ General context of the study ■ Requirements ■ Methodology of the study ■ Technologies selected for final trade-off ■ Reactor trade-off ■ Conversion trade-off ■ Critical technologies and development philosophy ■ Conclusion and perspectives CNES Directorate of Launchers Space transportation division of the French space agency ■ Responsible for the development of DIAMANT, ARIANE 1 to 4, ARIANE 5, launchers ■ System Architect for the Soyuz at CSG program ■ Development of VEGA launcher first stage (P80) ■ Future launchers preparation activities Multilateral and ESA budgets • To adapt the current launchers to the needs for 2015-2020 • To prepare launcher evolutions for 2025 - 2030, if needed • To prepare the new generation of expandable launchers (2025-2030) • To prepare the long future after 2030 with possible advanced launch vehicles ■ Future space transportation prospective activities, such as Exploration needs (including in particular OTV missions) Advanced propulsion technologies investigation General context ■ Background Last French studies on space reactors : • ERATO (NEP) in the 80’s, • MAPS (NTP) in the 90’s • OPUS (NEP) 2002-2004 ■ Since then Nuclear safe orbit
    [Show full text]
  • The European Launchers Between Commerce and Geopolitics
    The European Launchers between Commerce and Geopolitics Report 56 March 2016 Marco Aliberti Matteo Tugnoli Short title: ESPI Report 56 ISSN: 2218-0931 (print), 2076-6688 (online) Published in March 2016 Editor and publisher: European Space Policy Institute, ESPI Schwarzenbergplatz 6 • 1030 Vienna • Austria http://www.espi.or.at Tel. +43 1 7181118-0; Fax -99 Rights reserved – No part of this report may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or for any purpose with- out permission from ESPI. Citations and extracts to be published by other means are subject to mentioning “Source: ESPI Report 56; March 2016. All rights reserved” and sample transmission to ESPI before publishing. ESPI is not responsible for any losses, injury or damage caused to any person or property (including under contract, by negligence, product liability or otherwise) whether they may be direct or indirect, special, inciden- tal or consequential, resulting from the information contained in this publication. Design: Panthera.cc ESPI Report 56 2 March 2016 The European Launchers between Commerce and Geopolitics Table of Contents Executive Summary 5 1. Introduction 10 1.1 Access to Space at the Nexus of Commerce and Geopolitics 10 1.2 Objectives of the Report 12 1.3 Methodology and Structure 12 2. Access to Space in Europe 14 2.1 European Launchers: from Political Autonomy to Market Dominance 14 2.1.1 The Quest for European Independent Access to Space 14 2.1.3 European Launchers: the Current Family 16 2.1.3 The Working System: Launcher Strategy, Development and Exploitation 19 2.2 Preparing for the Future: the 2014 ESA Ministerial Council 22 2.2.1 The Path to the Ministerial 22 2.2.2 A Look at Europe’s Future Launchers and Infrastructure 26 2.2.3 A Revolution in Governance 30 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Session II-A-Current Status of the Ariane 4 Program and of The
    1994 (31st) Space Exploration and Utilization The Space Congress® Proceedings for the Good of the World Apr 27th, 1:00 PM - 4:00 PM Paper Session II-A - Current Status of the Ariane 4 Program and of the Ariane 5 Development James R. Youdale Arianespace Inc. Washington, D.C. Douglas A. Heydon Arianespace Inc. Washington, D.C. Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings Scholarly Commons Citation Youdale, James R. and Heydon, Douglas A., "Paper Session II-A - Current Status of the Ariane 4 Program and of the Ariane 5 Development" (1994). The Space Congress® Proceedings. 16. https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings/proceedings-1994-31st/april-27-1994/16 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Space Congress® Proceedings by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Current Status of the Ariane 4 Program and of the Ariane 5 Development James R. Youdale1 and Douglas A. Heyden~ Arianespace Inc. Washington, D.C. Abstract This paper provides an overview of the commercial siruation of Arianespace, a general update regarding its technical and operational activities and its near and medium term prospects. A summary of the Ariane 4 "track record" is given and the latest improvement to its third staae the HIO III, is presented. Operational improvements that reduce the interval between two = ' consecutive laWlches are also addressed. The ratiollale for going to Ariane 5 is discussed and the current status of the Ariane 5 development program is reviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • A B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
    A B 1 Name of Satellite, Alternate Names Country of Operator/Owner 2 AcrimSat (Active Cavity Radiometer Irradiance Monitor) USA 3 Afristar USA 4 Agila 2 (Mabuhay 1) Philippines 5 Akebono (EXOS-D) Japan 6 ALOS (Advanced Land Observing Satellite; Daichi) Japan 7 Alsat-1 Algeria 8 Amazonas Brazil 9 AMC-1 (Americom 1, GE-1) USA 10 AMC-10 (Americom-10, GE 10) USA 11 AMC-11 (Americom-11, GE 11) USA 12 AMC-12 (Americom 12, Worldsat 2) USA 13 AMC-15 (Americom-15) USA 14 AMC-16 (Americom-16) USA 15 AMC-18 (Americom 18) USA 16 AMC-2 (Americom 2, GE-2) USA 17 AMC-23 (Worldsat 3) USA 18 AMC-3 (Americom 3, GE-3) USA 19 AMC-4 (Americom-4, GE-4) USA 20 AMC-5 (Americom-5, GE-5) USA 21 AMC-6 (Americom-6, GE-6) USA 22 AMC-7 (Americom-7, GE-7) USA 23 AMC-8 (Americom-8, GE-8, Aurora 3) USA 24 AMC-9 (Americom 9) USA 25 Amos 1 Israel 26 Amos 2 Israel 27 Amsat-Echo (Oscar 51, AO-51) USA 28 Amsat-Oscar 7 (AO-7) USA 29 Anik F1 Canada 30 Anik F1R Canada 31 Anik F2 Canada 32 Apstar 1 China (PR) 33 Apstar 1A (Apstar 3) China (PR) 34 Apstar 2R (Telstar 10) China (PR) 35 Apstar 6 China (PR) C D 1 Operator/Owner Users 2 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Government 3 WorldSpace Corp. Commercial 4 Mabuhay Philippines Satellite Corp. Commercial 5 Institute of Space and Aeronautical Science, University of Tokyo Civilian Research 6 Earth Observation Research and Application Center/JAXA Japan 7 Centre National des Techniques Spatiales (CNTS) Government 8 Hispamar (subsidiary of Hispasat - Spain) Commercial 9 SES Americom (SES Global) Commercial
    [Show full text]