DOCSLIB.ORG

Management and Organization Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Management and Organization Review VOLUME 17 ISSUE 3 JULY 2021 ISSN: 1740-8776 Management and Organization Review Th e leading voice on indigenous management and organization research in China and all other transforming economies Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.40.40, on 01 Oct 2021 at 22:34:03, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2021.55 SPONSORS OF MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION REVIEW International Association for Chinese Management Research Offi cers Founding President Vice-President and Program Chair for 2023 Anne S. Tsui University of Notre Dame Conference Peking University Wei Shen Arizona State University Past President Representatives at Large Ray Friedman Vanderbilt University Lori Qingyuan Yue Columbia Business School President Wu Liu Hong Kong Polytechnic University Zhi-Xue Zhang Peking University Zhijun Chen Shanghai University of Finance and Economics President Elect Hinrich Voss HEC Montreal Runtian Jing Shanghai Jiao Tong University Executive Director PhD Student Representatives Wei Zhang Peking University Danyang Zhu Fudan University Kaixian Mao Hong Kong University of Executive Secretary/Treasurer Science and Economics Lerong He State University of New York at Brockport Leadership of Peking University Leadership of Fudan University President Ping Hao President Ningsheng Xu Leadership of Guanghua School of Leadership of School of Management Fudan Management University Dean Qiao Liu Dean Xiongwen Lu Assosciate Deans Li’an Zhou Deputy Dean Yaopeng Li Liansheng Wu Shengping Zhang Executive Associate Dean Jian Zhou Ying Zhang Associate Deans Yimin Sun Li Ma Zhiwen Yin Zheng Zhang Changjiang Lu Ming Zheng Yaohua Ye Weitao Zhao Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.40.40, on 01 Oct 2021 at 22:34:03, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2021.55 MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION REVIEW Volume 17 Issue 3 July 2021 Letter from the Editor 447 Regular Articles JULIANA SIWALE,JONATHAN KIMMITT, AND JOSEPH AMANKWAH-AMOAH The Failure of Hybrid Organizations: A Legitimation Perspective 452 CHENJIAN ZHANG Leveraging Logics to Address the Paradox: Commentary on ‘The Failure of Hybrid Organizations: A Legitimation Perspective’ 486 GIOVANNI BATTISTA DAGNINO AND ANNA MINÀ Unraveling the Philosophical Foundations of Co-opetition Strategy 490 FANGZHOU LIU,JIAN LIANG, AND MO CHEN The Danger of Blindly Following: Examining the Relationship Between Authoritarian Leadership and Unethical Pro-organizational Behaviors 524 XINLI HUANG,DI FAN,XIAOMING HE, AND YIYI SU The Micro-Foundation of Ambidextrous Foreign Direct Investment 551 NOOA NYKÄNEN Following the Old Road: Organizational Imprinting and the Regional Development of Russia 583 Dialogue, Debate, and Discussion HONGRYOL CHA,JIE WU, AND MASAAKI KOTABE The Vulnerability Problem of Business Ecosystems under Global Decoupling 617 HAO TAN AND MENGYING YANG The New Liability of Origin in Global Decoupling 624 LIANG WANG AND ZAIYANG XIE An Outcome of Decoupling and De-globalization? The Weakened Impact of Internationalization on Innovation of Chinese Firms Since 2016 630 JEFFREY W. PALLER How Is China Impacting African Cities? 636 © 2021 The International Association for Chinese Management Research Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.40.40, on 01 Oct 2021 at 22:34:03, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2021.55 EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Eric W. K. Tsang, University of Texas at Dallas, USA Arie Y. Lewin, Duke University, USA Focus: Rigor and Methods Andrew Van de Ven, University of Minnesota, USA INCOMING EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Focus: Engaged Indigenous Scholarship Xiao-Ping Chen, University of Washington, USA Sai Yayavaram, Indian Institute of Management DEPUTY EDITORS Bangalore, India Regional focus: India Helena Barnard, University of Pretoria, South Africa Regional focus: Africa FOUNDING EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Carl F. Fey, Aatlo University, Finland Anne S. Tsui, University of Notre Dame, USA, and Regional focus: Russia, Ex-Soviet Republics, Eastern Europe Peking University, China Xu Huang, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong DEPUTY EDITOR FOR DIALOGUE, DEBATE, Focus: Organizational Behavior AND DISCUSSION Peter Ping Li, University of Nottingham Ningbo, China, Liisa Välikangas, DTU Management Denmark, and Center for Creative Leadership, USA, and Copenhagen Hanken School of Economics, Finland Business School, Denmark Regional focus: China DEPUTY EDITOR FOR RESEARCH OUTREACH Xiaowei Rose Luo, INSEAD, France Sheen S. Levine, University of Texas at Dallas, USA Focus: Family Business and SMEs DEPUTY EDITOR FOR ARTWORK Gerald McDermott, University of South Carolina, USA Regional focus: Latin America Tony Fang, Stockholm Business School, Sweden Johann Peter Murmann, University of St. Gallen, DIRECTOR FOR MOR SOCIAL MEDIA - CHINA Switzerland Regional focus: China, Asia Pacific Steven S. Zhou, University of Nottingham Ningbo, China SENIOR EDITORS Yanjie Bian, University of Minnesota, USA, and Xi’an Employee voice behavior; top management teams; Jiaotong University, China leadership; negotiation; cross-cultural management; Social networks; social stratification; Chinese society conflict management Roy Chua, Singapore Management University, Singapore Yipeng Liu, University of Reading, UK Creativity; cross-cultural organizational behavior; Micro-foundation; social interaction; organizational diversity; trust solution; institutional solution; indigenous societal Lin Cui, Australian National University, Australia challenge International business; strategic management; Mark Lorenzen, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark comparative institutional analysis; Chinese outward Innovation studies; economic geography; organization FDI; state-owned enterprises studies; international business; strategy Jasmine Hu, Ohio State University, USA Dali Ma, Drexel University, USA Leadership; work teams; prosocial behavior; personality; Inequality and status hierarchy; innovation and gender entrepreneurship; organization theory; social networks; Can Huang, Zhejiang University, China sociology of China Innovation; intellectual property rights; science and Li Ma, Peking University, China technology policy International negotiation; participative management Thomas Hutzschenreuter, Technische Universitat Dalhia Mani, Indian Institute of Management München, Germany Bangalore, India Internationalization strategy; foreign direct investment; Organizational theory; interorganizational and panel data analysis interpersonal networks Rajiv Kozhikode, Simon Fraser University, Canada Stephan Manning, University of Sussex, UK Business-government relations; antecedents and Global outsourcing; geographic cluster development in consequences of various forms of corporate political global value chains; social entrepreneurship in Africa; activities; sociological foundations of organized sustainability standards misconduct; organizational innovation in emerging economies Silvia Massini, University of Manchester, UK Offshoring of innovation and knowledge intensive business Jing Li, Simon Fraser University, Canada services; economics and management of innovation; International investment strategies; emerging evolutionary and behavioral theories; adoption anddiffusion market multinational enterprises; international in innovation; knowledge creation and management joint ventures; innovation in emerging markets Maral Muratbekova-Touron, ESCP Europe, France Ning Li, University of Iowa, USA International HRM; talent management; cross-cultural Big data and team collaboration; individual difference; management; Russia; Kazakhstan; CIS OCB and proactive behavior; social network; team leadership Ilya Okhmatovskiy, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal Jian Liang, Tongji University, China Corporate governance; business-government relations; Creativity; human resource management; cross-cultural state capitalism; Russia and other ex-Soviet countries management Carine Peeters, Vlerick Business School, Belgium Wu Liu, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, International business; strategy; global sourcing; Hong Kong offshoring; outsourcing Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.40.40, on 01 Oct 2021 at 22:34:03, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2021.55 Emmanuella Plakoyiannaki, University of Leeds, UK Yijun Xing, Brunel University London, UK Qualitative research; SME internationalization; family Chinese indigenous leadership; Chinese traditional firm internationalization culture and philosophy; narrative/storytelling in Mooweon Rhee, Yonsei University, Korea organizations Organizational learning; organizational status; Ann Yan Zhang, Peking University, China corporate reputation; social networks; Asia-based Paradox; leadership; team dynamics; employee- theories of organization organization relationship; cross cultural studies Yeda Swirski de Souza, Unisinos Business School, Jianjun Zhang, Peking University, China Brazil Corporate social responsibility; corporate International business; strategic management; Brazil political activity; top management team; organization theory Sunny Li Sun, University of Massachusetts Lowell, USA Entrepreneurship; innovation; paradox; dialogue Zhi-Xue Zhang, Peking University, China between East and West Team process; negotiation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Working Paper Series 2016/47/TOM/EFE
    Working Paper Series 2016/47/TOM/EFE Fairness in Strategy: A Fair Process Evaluation of Strategy Schools Koen Tackx Vlerick Business School, [email protected] Corresponding author Ludo Van der Heyden INSEAD, [email protected] Paul Verdin Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management, [email protected] June 2016 The ‘strategy creation’ process – the process of formulating and implementing strategy – has been under critical study for decades for not delivering the desired results. The discussion on how a strategy process should be run has resulted in a number of ‘strategy schools’. Procedural justice theory is relevant to this discussion. It states that when people impacted by a process consider the process as ‘fair’ they demonstrate a higher level of trust and commitment, and performance increases. This article evaluates the extent to which traditional ‘strategy schools’ comply with the tenets of procedural justice theory and highlight the non-compliance with these tenets for each of these schools. We then propose a new strategy process model which has a greater fair process dimension than any of the more traditional ‘strategy schools’ and as such offers the potential to bring greater effectiveness to the strategy process. Keywords: Procedural Justice; Fair Process; Strategy Formulation; Strategy Implementation; Strategy Schools; Change Management Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2803145 A Working Paper is the author’s intellectual property. It is intended as a means to promote research to interested readers. Its content should not be copied or hosted on any server without written permission from [email protected] Find more INSEAD papers at http://www.insead.edu/facultyresearch/research/search_papers.cfm Outline 0.
    [Show full text]
  • Successful Players: Perspectives from the Western Business Education Sectors
    Successful players: Perspectives from the Western business education sectors Internationalization as a key strategy of European Business Schools Professor Christian Delporte Director, Business School Services, EFMD Associate Director, Quality Services, EFMD European Business Schools and Internationalization Some data… FT Global MBA ranking data: % of International students 1. Bradford University School of Management, UK (100%) 2. Lancaster University Management School, UK (98%) 3. Rotterdam School of Management, Netherlands (98%) 4. IMD, Switzerland (97%) 5. University of Edinburgh Business School, UK (96%) 6. Hult International Business School, US / UK / UAE / C (94%) 7. University of Oxford: Saïd, UK (93%) 8. Aston Business School, UK (93%) 9. Insead, France / Singapore (92%) 10. Birmingham Business School, UK (92%) FT Global MBA ranking data: International Board membership 1. Vlerick Business School, Belgium (100%) 2. IESE Business School, Spain (87%) 3. IE Business School, Spain (81%) 4. Hult International Business School, US / UK / UAE / C (80%) 5. INCAE Business School, Costa Rica (80%) 6. IMD, Switzerland (79%) 7. Sungkyunkwan University SKK GSB, South Korea (79%) 8. Esade Business School, Spain (71%) 9. Insead, France / Singapore (70%) 10. London Business School, UK (70%) FT Global MBA ranking data: International mobility 1. IMD, Switzerland 2. HEC Paris, France 3. London Business School, UK 4. University of St Gallen, Switzerland 5. Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University Netherlands 6. IESE Business School, Spain 7. Vlerick Business School, Belgium 8. Hult International Business School, US / UK / UAE / C 9. National University of Singapore Business School, Singapore 10. Insead, France / Singapore FT Global MBA ranking data: % International faculty 1. IMD, Switzerland (98%) 2.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 GLOBAL MBA RANKINGS He Benefits Attached to an MBA Weighting of Data Points (Full-Time and Part-Time MBA)
    2020 GLOBAL MBA RANKINGS he benefits attached to an MBA Weighting of Data Points (full-time and part-time MBA) are well documented: career Quality of Faculty: 34.95 % progression, networking International Diversity: 9.71% opportunities, personal Tdevelopment, salary... and the list Class Size: 9.71% goes on. However, in an increasingly Accreditation: 8.74% congested market, selecting the right Faculty business school can be difficult, which to Student Ratio: 7.76% is far from ideal given the time and Price: 5.83% investment involved. International Exposure: 4.85% Using a ranking system entirely geared and weighted to fact-based Work Experience: 4.85% *EMBA Weighting: Professional Work experience and criteria, CEO Magazine aims to cut Development: 4.85% international diversity are through the noise and provide potential adjusted accordingly. Gender Parity: 4.85% students with a performance benchmark **Online MBA Weighting: Delivery methods: 3.8% for those schools under review. Delivery mode and class 0 % 5 % 10 % 15 % 20 % 25 % 30 % 35 % size are removed. GLOBAL MBA RANKINGS TIER ONE Business School Country Business School Country AIX Marseille Graduate School of Management Monaco Emlyon Business School France American University: Kogod North America ESADE Business School Spain Appalachian State University* North America EU Business School Germany, Spain Ashland University North America and Switzerland Aston Business School UK Florida International University North America Auburn University: Harbert North America Fordham University North
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 GLOBAL MBA RANKINGS He Benefits Attached to an MBA Weighting of Data Points (Full-Time and Part-Time MBA)
    2020 GLOBAL MBA RANKINGS he benefits attached to an MBA Weighting of Data Points (full-time and part-time MBA) are well documented: career Quality of Faculty: 34.95 % progression, networking International Diversity: 9.71% opportunities, personal Tdevelopment, salary... and the list Class Size: 9.71% goes on. However, in an increasingly Accreditation: 8.74% congested market, selecting the right Faculty business school can be difficult, which to Student Ratio: 7.76% is far from ideal given the time and Price: 5.83% investment involved. International Exposure: 4.85% Using a ranking system entirely geared and weighted to fact-based Work Experience: 4.85% *EMBA Weighting: Professional Work experience and criteria, CEO Magazine aims to cut Development: 4.85% international diversity are through the noise and provide potential adjusted accordingly. Gender Parity: 4.85% students with a performance benchmark **Online MBA Weighting: Delivery methods: 3.8% for those schools under review. Delivery mode and class 0 % 5 % 10 % 15 % 20 % 25 % 30 % 35 % size are removed. GLOBAL MBA RANKINGS TIER ONE Business School Country Business School Country AIX Marseille Graduate School of Management Monaco Emlyon Business School France American University: Kogod North America ESADE Business School Spain Appalachian State University* North America EU Business School Germany, Spain Ashland University North America and Switzerland Aston Business School UK Florida International University North America Auburn University: Harbert North America Fordham University North
    [Show full text]
  • A League of Their Own: the Top 10 Master in Finance Programmes in Selected Categories As Rated by the 2011 Graduates
    A league of their own: the Top 10 Master in Finance programmes in selected categories As rated by the 2011 graduates Top for corporate finance Top for hedge funds Top for international finance Top for investments Top for merger and acquisition Rank Business School Rank Business School Rank Business School Rank Business School Rank Business School 1 Peking University: Guanghua 1 Edhec Business School 1 HEC Paris 1 MIT: Sloan 1 ESCP Europe 2 Lancaster University Mgt School 2 Imperial College Business School 2 University of Oxford: Saïd 2 University of Rochester: Simon 2 Eada Business School Barcelona 3 ESCP Europe 3 HEC Lausanne 3 Brandeis University IBS 3 Boston College: Carroll 3 Università Bocconi 4 HEC Paris 4 IE Business School 4 Grenoble Graduate School of Business 4 Lancaster University Management School 4 Frankfurt SFM 5 Boston College: Carroll 5 MIT: Sloan 5 Kozminski University 5 Imperial College Business School 5 HEC Paris 6 University of Rochester: Simon 6 University of Oxford: Saïd 6 Leeds University Business School 6 University of Edinburgh Business School 6 IE Business School 7 Adam Smith Business School 7 City University: Cass 7 Henley Business School 7 Edhec Business School 7 Cranfield School of Management 8 Leeds University Business School 8 HEC Paris 8 Warwick Business School 8 Peking University: Guanghua 8 University of Oxford: Saïd 9 Vlerick Business School 9 Henley Business School 9 Edhec Business School 9 Skema Business School 9 City University: Cass 10 Stockholm School of Economics 10 Leeds University Business Schoolt
    [Show full text]
  • INFORMATION SHEET for STUDENTS 2021-2022 the City Of
    INFORMATION SHEET FOR STUDENTS 2021-2022 The city of Maastricht Maastricht, the oldest city in the Netherlands, gained international fame as the 'birthplace of the European Union' by hosting of the European Summit in 1991, and as the city where the Treaty of Maastricht was signed in 1992. Maastricht is centrally located in the heart of Europe, bordering Belgium (a brisk 47 minute walk or 11 minutes of vigorous bike riding away) and Germany (only 35 minutes by car), which means that Brussels is an hour-and- a-half away, Amsterdam two, Paris and Frankfurt three, and London four-and-a-half hours. There are nine airports within an hour's travel, where low cost carriers will take you to any European city in a heartbeat. Located in the southernmost tip of the country, it has a reputation for feeling rather non-Dutch. To many Dutch people it even feels as if they are abroad and no longer in the Netherlands! They join the flocks of other tourists who visit Maastricht to go shopping, to get a taste of its laid-back and friendly atmosphere, or to check out one of its 1,660 monumental buildings. Maastricht is a cosy city of around 122,000 inhabitants. Known for its vibrant student life, there are dozens of student associations and organisations devoted to everything from sustainability to sports, from drama to music, and to volunteering, studying, and partying. Maastricht is the perfect setting for a university city, with many festivals and events reflecting a diversity of cultural influences, from Maastricht's famous annual Carnival to experimental theatre, from thought-provoking lectures to lively music concerts.
    [Show full text]
  • RETURN on INVESTMENT REPORT Full-Time MBA 2018
    QS TopMBA.com RETURN ON INVESTMENT REPORT Full-Time MBA 2018 Unlocking the value of the world’s top business schools QS TopMBA.com Return on Investment Report 2018 Contents Introduction 3 Fast Facts 6 Payback Period 7 ı Shortest Payback Period: MBA, Global 7 ı Shortest Payback Period: MBA, US & Canada 8 ı Shortest Payback Period: MBA, Europe 9 ı Shortest Payback Period: MBA, Asia-Pacific 10 ı Payback Period: Business Masters 11 Salary Levels 12 ı Highest Salary: MBA, Global 12 ı Highest Salary: MBA, US & Canada 13 ı Highest Salary: MBA, Europe 14 ı Highest Salary: MBA, Asia-Pacific 15 ı Salary Levels: Business Masters 16 Salary Uplift 17 ı Biggest Salary Uplift: MBA, Global 17 ı Biggest Salary Uplift: MBA, US & Canada 18 ı Biggest Salary Uplift: MBA, Europe 19 ı Biggest Salary Uplift: MBA, Asia-Pacific 20 ı Salary Uplift: Business Masters 21 10-Year ROI 22 ı Highest 10-Year ROI: MBA, Global 22 ı Highest 10-Year ROI: MBA, US & Canada 23 ı Highest 10-Year ROI: MBA, Europe 24 ı Highest 10-Year ROI: MBA, Asia-Pacific 25 2 QS TopMBA.com Return on Investment Report 2018 Introduction What is the value of an MBA? This is a question many prospective MBA candidates around the world will be asking, before making an investment that can comfortably run into six figures when tuition and forgone salary are both taken into account. Indeed, at some top US schools, tuition alone can come to $200,000. Is it worth the investment? Well, we can’t really quantify the non-monetary value of an MBA, but we can certainly take a stab at working out some of the financials.
    [Show full text]
  • INFORMATION SHEET for STUDENTS 2018-2019 the City Of
    INFORMATION SHEET FOR STUDENTS 2018-2019 The city of Maastricht Maastricht, the oldest city in the Netherlands, gained international fame as the 'birthplace of the European Union' by hosting of the European Summit in 1991, and as the city where the Treaty of Maastricht was signed in 1992. Maastricht is centrally located in the heart of Europe, bordering Belgium (a brisk 47 minute walk or 11 minutes of vigorous bike riding away) and Germany (only 35 minutes by car), which means that Brussels is 1.5 hours away, Amsterdam 2 hours, Paris and Frankfurt 3 hours, and London 4.5 hours. Also, there are nine airports within an hour's travel, where low cost carriers will take you to any European city in a heartbeat. Located in the southernmost tip of the country, it has a reputation for being 'a bit foreign' even to other Dutch people. Many tourists visit Maastricht to go shopping, to get a taste of its convivial atmosphere, or to check out one of its 1,660 monumental buildings. Maastricht is a cosy city of around 122,000 inhabitants. Known for its vibrant student life, there are dozens of student associations and organisations devoted to everything from sustainability to sports, from drama to music, and to volunteering, studying, and partying. Maastricht is the perfect setting for a university city, with many festivals and events reflecting a diversity of cultural influences, from Maastricht's famous annual Carnival to experimental theatre, from thought-provoking lectures to lively music concerts. Going out to eat or having a drink at one of our many bars and cafes, especially outside, is a favourite pastime of both students and locals.
    [Show full text]
  • Allora Advertiser Appointment on 4527 4630
    Issue No. 3400 The AlloraPublished by C. A. Gleeson Pty.Advertiser Ltd., at the Office, 53 Herbert Street, Allora, Q. 4362 “Since 1935” Issued Weekly as an Advertising Medium to the people of Allora and surrounding Districts. Your FREE Local Ph 07 4666 3128 - E-Mail [email protected] - Web www.alloraadvertiser.com THURSDAY, 30th JUNE 2016 ALLORA & THE BOER WAR Following on from the publication of the book “Keeping their Memory Alive” telling the stories of the men from the Allora district killed in WWI, the Allora and District Historical Society have decided to research the involvement of men from the Allora district in the Boer War, and the actions of the citizens of Allora during the war. The Boer War was fought in southern Africa from 1899 to 1902 and commenced before the Federation of the Australian colonies. It was fought between up to 500,000 troops from Great Britain and its colonies, and approximately 75,000 Boers who were Dutch and French Huguenot settlers in Transvaal and the Orange Free State fighting to retain their freedom from Great Britain. The Allora district’s involvement in military matters dates from November 1888 when a Rifle Corps was gazetted and steps were put in train for the purchase of land for a rifle range. In 1898 a sign-on took place for the Queensland Mounted Infantry in Allora. The Allora district soldiers made up a detachment of G Company of the Q.M.I. based in Warwick. In July 1899 the Queensland Government offered troops to assist Great Britain in its fight against the Boers in southern Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • The Top 10 Master in Finance Programmes in Selected Categories As Rated by the 2012 Graduates
    A league of their own: the Top 10 Master in Finance programmes in selected categories As rated by the 2012 graduates Top for corporate finance Top for hedge funds Top for international finance Top for investments Top for merger and acquisition Rank Business School Rank Business School Rank Business School Rank Business School Rank Business School 1 ESCP Europe 1 City University: Cass 1 HEC Paris 1 Tulane University: Freeman 1 ESCP Europe 2 Nova School of Business and Economics 2 Henley Business School 2 Brandeis University IBS 2 Nova School of Business and Economics 2 City University: Cass 3 Kozminski University 3 Imperial College Business School 3 Eada Business School Barcelona 3 Universidad Adolfo Ibañez 3 HEC Paris 4 HEC Paris 4 MIT: Sloan 4 Esade Business School 4 Peking University: Guanghua 4 Washington University: Olin 5 IE Business School 5 ESCP Europe 5 Essec Business School 5 Edhec Business School 5 Frankfurt SFM 6 Washington University: Olin 6 Essec Business School 6 Leeds University Business School 6 ESCP Europe 6 Università Bocconi 7 Stockholm School of Economics 7 IE Business School 7 Kozminski University 7 University of Edinburgh Business School 7 Eada Business School Barcelona 8 Lund University SEM 8 Skema Business School 8 Warwick Business School 8 University of Hong Kong 8 IE Business School 9 University of Oxford: Saïd 9 Aston Business School 9 University of Bath SoM 9 Tilburg University 9 Esade Business School 10 Lancaster University Management School 10 Nottingham University Business School 10 Aston Business School
    [Show full text]
  • Cronulla Sharks (Steve Mcnair) Turn Credits = 0.0 ______
    RUGBY LEAGUE BREAKOUT RLB10 Team Report Season 2 Week 2 22/12/05 Cronulla Sharks (Steve McNair) turn credits = 0.0 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------- Season Stats ------------------------------- Num Posn Name Games Carries Yards Err Kicks Chase Cover Tackles Missed Tries Drops Goals 1 FBK David Peachey 3 10 21 5 -/- -/- -/- 6 - - -/- -/- 2 WNG David Simmons 3 11 87 1 -/- -/- 1/1 8 - 1 -/- -/- 3 CEN Paul Mellor 3 1 4 1 -/- -/- -/- 8 - - -/- -/- 4 CEN Nigel Vagana 3 1 2 - -/- -/- -/- 4 1 - -/- -/- 5 WNG Luke Covell 3 2 11 1 -/- -/- -/- 2 - - -/- -/- 6 SOF Adam Dykes 3 11 81 - 1/1 1/1 -/- 10 1 1 -/- -/- 7 SCR Brett Kimmorley 3 12 45 - -/- -/- -/- 9 1 1 -/- -/- 8 PRP Danny Nutley 3 1 -1 - -/- -/- -/- 3 1 - -/- -/- 9 HKR Matt Hilder 3 7 51 1 -/- -/- -/- 5 1 2 -/- -/- 10 PRP Keith Galloway 3 1 9 - -/- -/- -/- 2 - - -/- -/- 11 SRF Paul Gallen 3 4 43 1 -/- -/- -/- 1 - 1 -/- -/- 12 SRF Phillip Leuluai 3 1 - - -/- -/- -/- 5 - - -/- -/- 13 LSF Phil Bailey 3 3 13 1 -/1 -/1 -/- 6 1 1 -/- 6/10 14 FBK Nathan Merritt - - - - -/- -/- -/- - - - -/- -/- 15 WNG Vince Mellars - - - - -/- -/- -/- - - - -/- -/- 16 CEN Beau Scott - - - - -/- -/- -/- - - - -/- -/- 17 SOF Greg Bird - - - - -/- -/- -/- - - - -/- -/- 18 SCR Ryan McGoldrick - - - - -/- -/- -/- - - - -/- -/- 19 PRP Hutch Maiava - - - - -/- -/- -/- - - - -/- -/- 20 HKR Michael Sullivan - - - - -/- -/- -/- - - - -/- -/- 21 SRF Sam Isemonger - - - - -/- -/- -/- - - - -/- -/- 22
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Business Accreditation Standards in Service to AACSB’S Membership
    d Effective July 28, 2020 1 2020 GUIDING PRINCIPLES AND STANDARDS FOR BUSINESS ACCREDITATION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AACSB wishes to recognize the members of the Business Accreditation Task Force (BATF), who worked tirelessly over nearly two years and collectively provided thousands of hours of thought leadership to develop standards that reflect the collective interest of the Accreditation Council. The BATF was formulated and charged by 2018–19 AACSB Board of Directors chair Caryn L. Beck-Dudley, then dean of the Leavey School of Business at Santa Clara University. Co-Chairs Nancy A. Bagranoff, University Professor, Accounting, University of Richmond Geoff Perry, AACSB Executive Vice President and Chief Officer of Asia Pacific Members Neil S. Braun, Dean Emeritus, Pace University Marion Debruyne, Dean, Vlerick Business School Irineu G. N. Gianesi, Dean of Academic Affairs, Insper Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa William H. Glick, H. Joe Nelson III Professor of Management, Rice University Charles Iacovou, Sisel Distinguished Dean of Business, Wake Forest University Eli Jones, Dean, Professor, and Lowry and Peggy Mays Eminent Scholar, Texas A&M University Jikyeong Kang, President, Dean, and MVP Professor of Marketing, Asian Institute of Management Susan Lehrman, Dean, Rowan University Stefanie A. Lenway, Dean, University of St. Thomas-Minnesota Peter Lindstrom, Dean, External Relations, University of St. Gallen Michel Patry, Chief Executive Officer, Fondation HEC Montréal Joyce A. Strawser, Dean, Seton Hall University Peter A. Todd, Director General and Dean, HEC Paris Lin Zhou, Dean, The Chinese University of Hong Kong AACSB Staff Caryn L. Beck-Dudley, President and Chief Executive Officer Stephanie Bryant, Executive Vice President and Chief Accreditation Officer Suzanne Mintz, Assistant Vice President of Accreditation Strategy and Policy 2 2020 GUIDING PRINCIPLES AND STANDARDS FOR BUSINESS ACCREDITATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS FY 2019–20 Chair John A.
    [Show full text]