THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF

~RP1 68 MINISTRY OF WORKS TANZANIA NATIONAL ROADS AGENCY - TANROADS Public Disclosure Authorized

Review and Update of Feasibility Study and Detailed Design of -Shelui Road Section Phase II

Detailed Engineering Design . . - Public Disclosure Authorized

FINAL REPORT - ~. ~ Or ~) uiJCr GRiTF3J cig ?-

Annex 8 - ENVINRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMVENT (EIA), SOCIAL IMPA CT ASSESSMVENT (SIA) & Public Disclosure Authorized RESETTLEMENT A CTION PLAN(RAP) ENVINR ONMENTAL IMPA CT A SSESSMENT (EIA), SOCIAL IMPACTASSESSMENT (SIA)& RESETTLEMENTA CTION PLAN (RAP) AS AMMENDED BY TANROADS Public Disclosure Authorized

TECHNIPLAN Rome and Dar es Salaam, May 2003FILE COPY I Singida Shelui Road: Detailed Engineering Design Final Report: Annex 8 - EIA, SIA & RIA Part 3

PART 3

RESETTLEMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT (RIA)

& RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (RAP)

Annex 8-Part3 Annex 8 - 51 Techniplan Singida Shelui Road: Detailed Engineering Design Final Report: Annex 8 - EIA, SIA & RIA Part 3

9. RESSETTLEMENT IMPACT ASSESSEMENT & RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN

9.1 Project Description in Relation to Resettlement

The road influence area is characterized by four types of urban and rural settlements as reviewed below:

i. Remote Village Areas ii. Village Areas Crossed by the Road iii. Trade Centers iv. Urban Areas,

9.1.1 Remote Village Areas. The rural territory - which covers 96% of - is divided among 236 Administrative Village Areas (A VA). The AVA are the smallest territorial units, at the bottom level of the administrative hierarchy.' The Regional Government, with foreign aid, is mapping their boundaries. The AVA have an average surface of 210 sq km with 3,600 inhabitants, two-thirds farmers, the rest semi-nomadic herdsmen, both segments sharing common lineage affiliations. In remote areas, uninfluenced by road traffic,2 most hamlets have traditional, nucleated layouts, with the homesteads built concentrically around the main meeting place, where the house of the elected Village Chairman is frequently found. No regular street grid separates the compounds. Hedges or palisades encompass the huts where the households, usually more than one, reside. Land occupancy rights are still inspired by customary law and household members take care of the tracks, the water supply and other communal facilities. Isolated homesteads are rare in the countryside, save seasonal herdsmen camps, makeshift farmring shacks and a few compounds of medicine men. Specialized buildings - stores, temples, offices - are uncommon, except primary schools, located a mile or so from the nearest hamlet and serving more than one AVA. As traditional hamlets lie far from the road, their land tenure system will hardly be affected by the project.

9.1.2 Village Areas traversed by the project road. Singida -Shelui Road splits 10 AVA, covering a total surface of 2,500 sq km, with some 40,000 inhabitants.

General features. Unlike traditional hamlets , the villages crossed by the project road are modem settlements, with a regular layout complying with the physical planning rules introduced by the Govemment since the 1960s. Under such rules, the village streets must be reshaped into a geometric grid on both sides of the trunk road, clear of the right of way. The elected Village Chairman is responsible for rule abidance. He allocates square plots to those who intend to build new houses. The old houses were realigned in the grid long time ago. The State owns the land but the dwellers enjoy a free occupancy right, compensated if the plot is confiscated for public utility. The built-up portions of the modem AVA are ribbon shaped, with house rows lining both sides of the highway to exploit through-fare business opportunities. The Village Areas crossed by the project road feature specialized buildings facing the road front, such as stores, bars, small hotels, eating rooms and workshops. Vendor stalls and shacks are also frequent.

Village Areas are grouped in Wards (Kata), which in their turn are grouped in Districts (Wilaya) Larger villages are divided in administrativequarters and hamlets 2 The region's trunk roads connect Singida Town respectively with . and Nzega

Annex 8-Parn3 Annex 8 - 52 Techniplan Singida Shelui Road: Detailed Engineenng Design Final Report: Annex 8 - EIA, SIA & RIA Part 3

Along the road, village dwellers are ethnically mixed and economically diversified, with immigrants from other regions. Extended families are rarer than in remote hamlets.

Upgraded Village Quarters. Along Singida-Shelui road section, the Regional Government has participated to the development of some major villages, like Misigiri, Ulemo and Shelui Nselembwe, designing grid-shaped quarters served by streets, wells, markets and other amenities. The Local Government has built the urban infrastructure of these new quarters and rents out the plots for Sh 4,500 yearly to those who intend to build houses, complying with the prescribed rural-construction standards. Although Upgraded Village Quarters date back to the 1980s, half of them are still empty due to weak demand (or over-sized offer). The underdevelopment is contributed by:

* People prefer the plots granted free-of-charge by the Village Chairmen, * The Regional Government lacks funds to complete the infrastructure of the planned quarters.

Among the Government-sponsored Upgraded Village Quarters, only one, in Shelui Nselembwe Trade Center, is affected by the present road project (see below).

9.1.3 Trade Centers: they are a special category of settlements, founded by Arab merchants in rural Tanzania more than a century ago. Such Centers enjoy a legally-defined urban status, blending the authority of an elected Council with the customary trading prestige of the descendants of the Arab forefathers, most coming from the Sultanate of Oman. Over the years, the Trade Centers have attracted a host of incomers from Singida and other regions. Their population is in the 2,000-5,000 range, mostly made up of traders-cum-farm. The migration turnover is quite high. The District Town Planning Offices have re-designed the layout of the Trade Centers, featuring rectangular plots of a standard size (m 15 by 10), rented by the Regional Government at Sh 4,500 yearly to both the old residents and the newcomers. Numerous traders rent two or mhore contiguous plots to have a multi-compartment house. District Authorities build streets, wells, drains, latrines, markets, bus stops, postal services and other amenities. There is a primary school in each Trading Center. Singida - Shelui road section cuts across two Trading Centers, namely: Iguguno at km 22, Shelui -Nselembwe at km 86,

9.1 .4 Singida Urban Area. Singida Town rose as a Trade Center established in pre-colonial times by an Arab merchant near the ruler's headquarters of a local ethnic group. In the colonial period, the town became a major administrative center. Nowadays, Singida Urban Area covers a District surface of 310 km2, with 150,000 inhabitants. The town core extends over 15 km2 with 95,000 residents. The remaining urban administrative area is, as a matter of fact, strewn with small rural settlements. Singida - Shelui road cuts across 10 kn of Urban District land, northwestward from the present zero point until District border. Up to km 10, the road cuts across typical countryside landscapes, with agro-pastoral villages, hamnlets and sparse homesteads. The project will slightly affect Singida town as the right of way is quite narrow in Singida's urban outskirts - 15 m on each roadside, as prescribed by urban street regulations - few buildings encroach into the corridor.

9.2 Potential Impacts

The upgrading of the road to bitumen standards requires the respect of the right of way, totaling 54.25 acres. Such right is 22.5 m on each side of the design centerline in the rural areas, for a total length of 99.427 km. For 10 km of road in Singida Urban District the right of way is 15 m on both side of the centerline. The design route will cross 12 major towns and villages. In each settlement the project will impact on current land use both within the right of way corridor and outside. It requires the relocation and compensation of both residential buildings, business or

Annex 8-Part3 Annex 8 - 53 Techniplan Singida Shelui Road: Detailed Engineering Design Final Report: Annex 8 - EIA, SIA & RIA Part 3

community service premises and farms. For this reason, some buildings belonging to the Administrative Village Areas (AVA) intersected by the road must be demolished.

At Iguguno trading center: The road will be realigned. It will cross in the farmlands and residential areas. Some buildings will be demolished. The bypass around the town will not physically affect the Center. However, the center will be economically affected as local business people will miss the new traffic flow and will be obliged either to resettle closer to the new route, or to try a new chance elsewhere. It is now a matter of local policy whether the project should assist this spontaneous relocation effort, even though precedents of this kind can hardly be found in earlier environmental studies for road projects across the country. It is most likely that the settlements will move towards the new road realignment as it is not far (about lkm) from Iguguno trading center.

At Shelui Nselembwe Trade Center: The project road will affect the Center physically but also slightly in business-wise: in fact, a whole row of houses and commercial premises lining the right side of the road, Tabora direction, encroaches into the right of way, but can be relocated in the immediate vicinities, possibly without 'damaging the business opportunities. The improvement of road may affect the business at Shelui trading center, as many vehicles may not stop at Shelui due to good road condition.

The resettlement in the area will be contributed by road construction works including road realignment, civil works, borrow pitting activities, camp siting and detours. Aong others, the resettlement impacts resulting from this undertaking covers:

- Displacing a total of 113 building structures which accommodates 52 businesses, 61 residencies, 2 offices and one mosque. However, 9 building structures are under construction. - Displacing the total farming area amount to 59.25acres..

Impact of the road project on the farmlands. The impact on the farmlands along the road will be limited. In fact: - no cultivation does encroach on the existing right of way - the realigned sections of the road will cross farmlands for a length of 5 km. - the selected borrow pits are located in thickets and other currently unfarmed areas - quarries lie far from farm plots - the new Sekenke route will run along Kinkungu river through steep, unfarmed hills.

Many fallow areas are suitable for contractors' work sites, detours and waste disposal. The project road is likely to affect 59.25 acres of existing farmlands due to road realignments or borrow pit use, as summarized below:

Table 9.1: Summary of the impact of the project on localfarms

Areas Famreands Number of plots ______(a c re s)______Iguguno bypass 54.25 34 Minor realignments 3.0 10 Borrow pits 2.0 2 Total 59.2 46

Source: Consultant'sfield survey, August-September 2001 and Tanroadsfield survey May 2003

Annex 8-Part3 Annex 8 - 54 Techniplan Singida Shelui Road- Detailed Engineering Design Final Report: Annex 8 - EIA, SIA & RIA Part 3

The displaced community in terms of losing their farmlands and houses will be compensated and relocated accordingly.

9.3 Objectives

The main objective of this resettlement programe is to improve or at least to restore the social and economic base of those to be relocated along Singida - Shelui road. In implementing this resettlement programme Tanzania legislations and World Bank Operation Directives related to resettlement have been followed

9.4 Socio-economic Study:

9.4.1 Land use and land tenure system in the road area

(a) Land use. The land use patterns of Singida Region are as summarized below:

Table 9.2: Land tenure categories of Singida Region

Land use type km2 % I | Farmlands (mostly annual crops) 2,600 5.4 2 Fallow and open grazing & hunting land 32,000 66.1 3 Thicket 7,500 15.5 4 Forests of various densities 6,200 12.8

_ Built-up areas 140 0.2 Total 48,440 100.0

Source: Consultant's estimates combining various statistical references andfield checks

The Road Influence Area reflects, on a small scale, the broad land-use pattern of Singida Region.

(b) Land tenure system. The land of Singida Region is a government property as applicable in Tanzania. The local population is entitled to occupancy rights, as defined by the Land Act of 1999 and the related secondary legislation. The existing land ownership in rural village areas along the project road is customary ownership and majority of the households in the urban area and trading centers along the project road have the Land Title Deed.. Legally, the Land Tenure System of Singida kegion is articulated in five Territorial Sub-Systems, namely:

i. Village Areas: they comprise all rural territories except the Forest and Game Reserves ii. Trade Centers: as part of urban land use, they include built-up areas and small outskirts iii. Urban Areas: they are three, engulfing the district town centers and their rural outskirts iv. Forest Reserve in Sekenke escarpment v. Game Reserve in Wembere lowlands

The use of farmlands, rangelands, forests and other natural resources is regulated within the framework of the five Territorial Tenure Sub-Systems, whose features are profiled in the table below and reviewed in the subsequent descriptions.

Annex 8-Part3 Annex 8 - 55 Techniplan Singida Shelui Road: Detailed Engineering Design FinalReport: Annex 8 - EIA, SIA & RIA Part3

Table 9.3: Land tenure sub-systems of Singida Region

Area Sub-systems No. % of Description kM2 Region's 1. Village Areas 236 47,050 95.60 Basic Territorial Units 2. Trade Centers 5 25 0.01 Iguguno, Shelui Nselembwe and _ _ I__others 3. Urban Areas (1) 4 410 1.00 Singida Town and three other District Townships 4. Forest Reserves 1 1,800 3.65 Sekenke 5. Game Reserves 1 60 0.12 Wembere Total 49,345 100.00 4 Districts (3 of them in the road ______I influence area)

(1) Including the rural outskirts of the DistrictTowns

The road influence area covers some 20,000 km2 within Singida Region, of which about 18,300 belong to Village Areas, 310 to Urban Areas, 5 to Trade Centers and 1,860 to Forest and Game Reserves.

(c) Hunting regime. All rural territories except built-up areas and Forest and Game Reserves have the status of "Open Lands", where the wild animals that are unprotected by the law can be hunted freely. Hunters must pay to the Government the gazetted hunting fees.

9.4.2 Other Social Economic Issues: The population and other social issues were reviewed as indicated in-Appendix C, D, E, F and G of this Annex.

9.5 Legal Framework

9.5.1 Applicable rules. The Land Act and Village Land Act of 1999, Land Regulations of 2001 and the Government Standing Order on expropriation for public utility prescribe that the holders of occupancy rights on the land estates pre-empted for the works must be compensated and assisted to relocate their assets in the nearest suitable place. Most expropriation disputes in similar projects are due to disagreements on the value at which the estate and its improvements are to be compensated. The compulsory resettlement of constructions, farms and business premises must ensure at least equal compensation values, both to the legal owners and to those who have occupied the road reserve area disregarding the right of way. ' According to the law, the expropriated owner must be compensated with a price equal to the value that the "un- exhausted improvements" (buildings, infrastructure, plantations, etc.) would fetch if sold on the open market. 4 The replacement value is defined as the cost of acquiring a similar estate and putting up such improvements as those existing when evaluated. Allowance is made for age, state of repair and economic obsolescence. According to Tanzania law, the compensation should cover: i) Market value of the real property (i.e value of un-exhausted improvements and land). ii) Accommodation allowance (i.e market rent of the affected building per month multiplied by 36 months).

3Equal also apply to illegal houses built inside the road reserve area 4"Un-exhausted improvements", i e, those notffully depreciated, meani any qualitypennanently attached to the land, resultingfrom capital or laborexpenditure by the holder of a Right of Occupancy

Annex 8-Part3 Annex 8 - 56 Techniplan Singida Shelui Road: Detailed Engineering Design FinalReport: Annex 8 - EIA, SIA & RIA Part3 iii) Loss of profit allowance which is assessed by establishing Net Profit per month evidenced by audit accounts multiplied by 36 months. iv) Disturbance allowance which is calculated by the value of the land by average percentage rate of interest offered by commercial banks on 12 months fixed deposit at the time of loss of interest in land. v) Transport allowance which is actual cost of transporting 12 tons of luggage rail or road (whichever is cheaper) within 20 km from the point of displacement.

9.5.2 Real estate compensation rules. According to current applicable legislation in Tanzania, the land has a value. The land owner with either a title deed or customary ownership has to be compensated in cash for loosing the land for other development. The Government will simply provide the resettled owner with alternative land plots of the same size in the nearest suitable location for both residential and business purposes. The resettled individuals have to buy the alternative plot for resettlement. Free plots are available close to the buildings and farms that will be removed from the road reserve area. The District Council authorities, in collaboration with Wards (Kata) authorities and village chairmen, will assist the resettlement of the displaced owners as indicated in Appendix L. TANROADS in collaboration with the government valuer has identified the holders of dislocated occupancy rights and estimated the value of such rights. The District Council in collaboration with the village government will provide plots to accommodate the displaced owners. The Ministry of Finance through TANROADS will liquidate the compensation sums using project funds.

9.5.3 Farmland compensation rules. Majority of the farmlands along Singida Shelui road section belong to individuals. Some are State owned and are managed by village authorities under the supervision of the Local Government. The allocation of individual property rights at village level will be implemented as stipulated by the Land Act and Village Land Acts of 1999 which covers: o Farmers to enjoy individual occupancy rights allocated by Village Councils as well as customary land tenureship. o Farmers be legally entitled to compensation for loss of crops, grazing land or forest. O The govemment be liquidated by the project for the loss of rangelands in the borrow pits.

9.5.4 Detours and campsite: Compensation should follow the guidelines stipulated in this report..

9.5.5 Gap analysis. The Resettlement Impact Assessment (RIA) and the Resettlement Action Plan RAP have been prepared to make it consistent with both Tanzanian law and WB OP 4.12. A 'gap analysis' has been undertaken as required by OP 4.12, in order to measure the difference between Tanzanian law and World Bank requirements, with special attention for farmland, rangeland, forests and access to other basic resources. The analysis indicates when Tanzanian law and the World Bank Operation Policy are not full in accord, the higher of the two standard will apply. This approach fully meets the requirement of the lesser standard. On the expropriation for public utility the World Bank provisions further emphasized that: - the squatters and the renters of properties and businesses must be compensated and assisted for suitable relocation - not only property but also business must be considered in compensation - the use of rangelands and forest lands are part of the economic asset base and must be compensated in case of temporary or permanent interruption - farmers must be compensated not only for lost crops but also for the loss of occupancy rights and they must be assisted to find an equal or better relocation site - the value of crops and properties must be valuated on a market basis and not imposed by bulletins attached to formal legal provisions

Annex 8-Part3 . Annex 8 - 57 Techniplan Srngida Shelui Road: Detailed Engineering Design Final Report: Annex 8 - EIA, SIA & RIA Part 3

- the use of borrow pits, quarries, camp sites and detour areas must not be negotiated between the contractors and the village authorities but must be compensated on the basis of the economic parameters defined by the Resettlement Action Plan

9.5.6 Clearance procedure for RAP. All RAP procedures will be cleared with both the Government of Tanzania and the World Bank.

9.6 Eligibility

The consultant carried out a 100 percent reconnaissance of impacts. This was been carried out in August 2001. However, the consultant's report was inadequate to effectively address the resettlement issues in the project area. In May 2003, TANROADS officials and Government valuer reviewed the resettlement reconnaissance and consultants report to address among others, the comments raised by the World Bank. The reconnaissance has covered all structures and farms whether legal or illegally existing. Most of the affected properties to be displaced are located in the traditional land ownership. The project will compensate all constructions, both permanent and temporally, put up squatters within the existing right of way. The compensation has been detailed in terms of the same market value as a legal structure. The same resettlement package will be offered to regular settlers and business people and squatters. The renters and leases are eligible for assistance. The authorities will make sure that the rights of the person who uses the building are compensated in accordance with the rules set out in both Tanzanian legislation and World Bank Operation Directives.

The displaced person in the project area includes the communities owning the houses, farm plots and businesses within the right of way. Two households and two farm plots are likely to be affected by borrow pitting activities though are not within the right of way. Other properties which will be considered for compensation are those which will be affected during the road construction activities particularly those resulting from detours and camp siting. Currently it is estimated that ten plots will be affected by detours. The actual relocation cost for the detours will be undertaken during road construction and will be taken care by the contractor. However, it is envisaged that the detours will be kept to minimum.

The cut-off date for eligibility for relocation is May, 2003. The compensation will be implemented within 6 months after the approval of the valuation report. Thereafter, the penalty equivalent to the commercial bank rate for the fixed deposit account will be charged.

9.7 Valuation procedure and compensation for losses

9.7.1 Survey method. The road project will impact upon properties and business activities, both inside and outside the road reserve corridor. 5 After reviewing the land use patterns and land tenure systems of the project region, the RIA study has assessed the expected impacts of the project upon:

i. Settlements, buildings and related business activities ii. Farmlands, rangelands an woodlands outside forest reserves iii. Forest reserves and game reserves

Given the relatively soft impact of the project on land resources and real estates, the survey has adopted a 100% reconnaissance method, without the need to use any sampling technique.

5The land use patterns and settlements along the road and in its influence area are described in Part 1, § 4.

Annex 8-Part3 Annex 8 - 58 Techniplan Singida Shelui Road: Detailed Engineering Design . Final Report: Annex 8 - EIA, SIA & RIA Part 3

9.7.2 Collaboration with local authorities and communities in RAP Preparation. The Consultant has carried out a detailed field inventory of the resettlement needs generated by the project. The inventory has involved the key local stakeholders, such as:

(a) the Land Office of Singida Region (b) The three Town Planning Offices of Singida and Iramba Districts (c) ad-hoc Resettlement Committees set up by the targeted urban and rural communities.

Public consultation has been carried out at two levels. Firstly public consultation was undertaken with stakeholders along the project corridor. The participants in the consultation process had a strong conviction that paving the road will have a positive and profound impact on their lives and livelihood, and they were genuinely grateful for this "overdue" development. Negative impacts, like road safety, were cited.

The fieldwork has focused on the buildings, business premises and farms dislocated by the project. The results of the participatory assessment work, including the minutes of the meetings with local stakeholders, are displayed in Appendix P

9.7.3 Compensation criteria for buildings, businesses and farms to be relocated. The property, businesses and farms to be relocated from the design right of way will be dealt with as follows:

Legal constructions. The resettlement scheme will compensate the owners of constructions for their losses and will provide alternative areas for relocation with equal opportunities.

Illegal structures. The project will compensate all constructions, both permanent and temporary, put up by squatters within the existing right of way. The compensation has been detailed in_terms of the same market value as legal structures. The same resettlement package will be offered to regular settlers and business people and squatters.

Business Compensation. As far as commercial business is concemed, the project considers the payment in terms of allowances for loss of profit for 36 months. People loosing temporary business structures (e.g. vending stalls), will be assisted for suitable relocation. As to the benefits entitled to those who rent a business space in a structure to be demolished, the emphasis will be not on compensation, but on restoring income and access to the asset base. Hence, in case of those renting business, this means that the project will compensate the losses and provide assistance to find another suitable business location.

Farms compensation: the existing farms will be displaced by road realignment, detours and borrow pitting activities. The compensation will be implemented according to the rules

In undertaking valuation of prpoerties for compensation, the value of salvaged materials have not been deducted from the valuation of affected premises.

9.7.4 Inventory of resettlement needs. In August 2001, the Consultant inventorised buildings presently occupying the perimeter of the future road reserve area, either confirmed or realigned. The inventory was carried out jointly with the Local Authorities, including: a. Singida Regional Lands Office, represented by the Senior Lands Officer and the Chief Surveyor, who personally joined the consulting team for 20 full working days b. The three Town Planninz Officers of Singida Urban District (km I to 10 of the road), Singida Rural District (km 10 to 40) and (km 40 to 110), summnoned by the Regional Land Office

Annex 8-Part3 Annex 8 - 59 Techniplan Singida Shelui Road: Detailed Engineering Design FinalReport: Annex 8 - EIA, SIA & RIA Part 3

c. The Divisions authorities of Kinyangiri, Kinampanda, Kisiriri, and Shelui d. The Village Chairmen of the concerned settlements

However, in May 2003 Tanroads officials and a government valuer from Singida town council in collaboration with above-mentioned stakeholders revisited the inventory of properties to be resettled in favour of road construction.

Table 9.4: Settlements crossed by Singida -Shelui road

Settlement Chainage Population Settlement Type - ~~(kmn) (2001) 1 Singida Towr 0 150,000 Urban core & suburban outskirts 2 Manga 13 2,500 Semi-traditional Administrative Village Area (AVA) 3 Msisi 18 3,000 Modern AVA with all houses realigned into 3 Mssi1300 a grid pattem 4 Ntondo 20 2,000 Modem AVA, 80 % of houses realigned 5 Iguguno (1) 32 5,500 Trade Center designed by Singida Town 5 Iguguno(1) 32 5,500 Planning Office 6 Tumuli 40 3,800 Semi-traditional AVA with regional 6 Tumuli40 3,800 ~~livestock market 7 Kitusha 55 2,700 Semi-traditional AVA, 40 % of houses 7 Kitusha55 2,700 ~~realigned 8 Kyengege 61 4,800 Modern AVA, 65% of houses realigned 9 Ulemo 70 5,700 Modern AVA with Urban Development Ulemo70 5,700 ~Quarter 10 Misigiri 74 5,300 Modem AVA with Urban Development Quarter I I Shelui 95 6,000 Trade Center designed by Iramba Town Nselembwe 9 Planning Office 12 Malende 106 3,500 Modern AVA, half of the houses realigned

(1) Bypassed by the realignment, which will cut across the town's farrnlands

Apart from Iguguno Town and Sekenke Escarpment, the design route will mostly follow the present gravel road, so that for 88 km out of 109.427km the works will hardly disturb property beyond the existing road reserve area. The need to meet design standards has just led to minor adjustments of the horizontal geometry, with little if any dislocation of real estates. Minor realignments will entail compensating just 3 ha of farmlands and no constructions.

TANROADS in collaboration with the Government Valuer undertook a detailed assessment of resettlement need and valuation of properties to be displaced by road project implementation.

9.7.5 Assessment of buildings and business value. The Consultant has assessed one by one all the buildings that must be destroyed within the confirmed or realigned right of way of the project road. The assessment has been carried out mobilizing the Land Office of Singida Region, the Land Offices of Singida Urban, Singida Rural and Iramba Districts and the communities of the 12 concerned towns and villages. During the assessment every individual to be affected in terms of being relocated was required to form to declare the properties and estimated values for compensation of the property (Appendix R- Typical form). The form is in Swahili version to enable the DPs to fill easily. In the assessment of the buildings and business value it was revealed that:

Annex 8-Part3 Annex 8 - 60 Techniplan Singida Shelui Road: Detailed Engineering Design FinalReport: Annex 8 - EIA, SIA & RIA Part 3

(a) The towns and major villages are well planned on both sides of the road, with most houses beyond the 45-meter right of way. Despite that, a few buildings - mainly shops, bars and mills - exist within the present right of way of the road. As they do not comply with road reserve legislation, the owners have not invested too much. The major settlements traversed by the project road - among which Singida Urban, Msisi, Misigiri, Shelui Nselembwe - have relatively high standard houses. Cement/sand blocks or burnt bricks are used for foundations and walls as well as corrugated iron sheets for roofing. However, a few houses in major centers and many houses in minor villages, like Manga Msisi or Iguguno are made of mud-and-poles for walls, grass thatching for roofs. Based on construction elements, the Land Offices of the concerned Districts have classified the buildings to be demolished in three categories, attributing to each category an estimated value.

If the building is in good conditions, the compensation for loss of construction can be estimated according to the standard established by the Ministry of Lands and Human Settlement Development. The typical properties valuation analysis was undertaken as presented in Appendix K.

Some of the building structures are makeshift constructions, with mud-brick walls, tin plates and thatched roofs. All buildings in the 45 m right of way have been carefully inventoried and mapped by the topographic survey at scale 1:2000 carried out for the present project. The project will compensate the squatters for the removal of illegal constructions.

(b) More than half of the buildings to be demolished close to the road are presently used as commercial, like shops, guesthouses, restaurants, kiosks, groceries and bars. Some buildings host artisan services, as grain mills, garages and workshops. Places of worship are also found near the road and a small mosque occupies the right of way in Shelui

9.7.6 Individual resettlement of buildings in the Village Areas (km 10 to 109.427km). Some houses lie outside the plots designed by the Districts Town Planning Officers. Such houses form rows parallel to the legal plots, but closer than. allowed to the road. This may be due to the owner's eagerness to be closer to commercial traffic. Some Village Chairmen tolerate such behavior. The field inventoly of the buildings to be demolished in the two Rural Districts along the road was carried out in August 2001 in collaboration with local government leadership including village leaderships. The buildings and business to be affected are found in Manga, Kitusha, Kyegenge, Ulemo, Misigiri and Malende villages (Appendix J)

Table 9.5: Buildings, businesses and farms to be resettled in the Village Area (excluding Msisi, Iguguno ahd Shelui)

District Buildin s Residential Business Farm Singida Rural 3 - 3 Iramba 14 8 10 3 Total 17 8 13 3

Source: Consultant's field investigations, August-September 2001 and Tanroads field investigation May 2003

9.7.7 Resettlement of community structures and Sensitive Properties. As far as the sensitive properties are concerned, there is only one mosque at Shelui. The mosque serves about 30 people. The mosque lies in the project right of way, at 106km in Shelui Village Area. The mosque is about 6m x 12 m, it is built in mud bricks. OP 4.12 has clear provision for restoring access to community structures, including mosques. A plan for the resettlement of the mosque is included in the RAP. The compensation and replacement package is included in individual

Annex 8-Part3 Annex 8 - 61 Techniplan Singida Shelui Road: Detailed Engineering Design Final Report: Annex 8 - EIA, SIA & RIA Part 3

resettlement of buildings in the Village Areas, km 10 to 109.427 as indicated in Appendix J. Special attention was undertaken and stakeholders were consulted to explain the issue of relocating the mosque. A study team held a detailed discussion with stakeholders of the mosque which includes imams, sheikhs, worshipers and mosque sponsors. There was a mutual agreement for the relocation of the mosque as presented in Appendix (R). However, during evaluation this amount was elevated to ease the relocation of this property.

9.7.8 Collective resettlement of Msisi Village (km 22). Msisi represents an outstanding case. Located 20 km away from Singida, it is a compact village, with an urban grid traced according to the guidelines of the District Town Planning Office. Unfortunately, the house rows on both sides of the road lie within less than 25 m off the centerline and occupy a higher ground than the road. A total of 39 buildings must be displaced, as the centerline follows the existing route inside Msisi village. These buildings accommodate 14 businesses and 33 residences. The detailed inventory of the buildings to be demolished is shown in Appendix J with the names of the owners, the description of the buildings and their value, as estimated by the Government Valuer.

It was agreed that all the buildings would be shifted to other areas, with compensation paid by the government through the project fund.

9.7.9 Resettlement of buildings in Singida Urban District (km 0 to 10). Within the outskirts of Singida Town, from the zero point of the road until the border with Singida Rural District at km 10, a total of four buildings lie within less than 15 m of the design centerline. This is in contrast with the building regulations in the area.

Table 9.6: Buildings in the right of way, Singida Urban District (km 1-10)

Use of the buildings to be dislocated Residential | Commercial Total 0 4 4

9.7.10 Collective resettlement of Shelui Nselembwe Trade Center (km 92). Within the Trade Center, a total of 35 building structures located on the right side of the road (Tabora border direction) lie within less than 25 m of the design centerline. The buildings accommodates 26 businesses and 3 residencies. The houses built outside the urban plots designed by the Town Planning Officer of Iramba District in the 1980s - are located parallel to the legal plots but closer than allowed to the road. The aim of the owners was to establish their business as close to traffic as possible. The encroachment of the right of way was tolerated by District Authorities. The detailed inventory of 35 building structures to be demolished in Shelui Nselembwe are shown in Appendix J (This excludes mosque).

The buildings date from the last 15 years or less, all of them are made with cement blocks and have roofs of corrugated iron sheets. All the buildings will be rebuilt in a new estate close to the same side of the road. The District authorities will not license for the same activities the owners of the houses which will be in the road's frontline after the demolition of the present row of business premises. This will help the resettled business owners to promptly re-establish their commercial services.

Annex 8-Part3 Annex 8 - 62 Techniplan Singida Shelui Road- Detailed Engineering Design Final Report: Annex 8 - EIA, SIA & RIA Part 3

9.7.11 Resettlement of agricultural activities and Building resulting from Iguguno Bypass (km 32)

(a) Overview. The upgraded road will bypass Iguguno town. Figure 13 in Part 4 illustrates the present road and the bypass alignment through Iguguno urban area. The road crosses 5km of farmlands. Due to the local 3-year rotation system, 1/3 of the farmlands are under actual cropping in any given year on either side of the road. The staple crops along the existing alignment includes sorghum,, maize, bush millet, sunflower, groundnuts and other crops. In general, the plots are cultivated in the main rainy season. Only 10% of the farms, those which lie in favorable drainage positions, are cultivated two seasons a year.

(b) Compensation criteria of agricultural resources. According to World Bank's OP 4.12, the project is responsible to ensure that any farmer dispossessed of his land is given access to cultivate alternative land of equal or better quality and is compensated for relocation costs. He will also be paid for the loss of the crops destroyed by the road works. Compensation will be based on the actual market values of the crop, regardless of the nominal values prescribed by the legislation in force. Such values are very low, as they date back to 10 years ago. The compensation rates will not be left to the contractor and farmer to negotiate indiyidually. The present study has endeavoured to determine them fairly and consistently for the whole project area. The individuals have been recognised as loosing not only their crop, but also their access to land. This is all part of their asset base. In order to restore their income stream, therefore, their entitlement package reflects all their assets as indicated in Appendix J.

(c) Resettlement offarmlands and building at Iguguno bypass (km 32-39). To build the 5.2 km bypass around Iguguno Town, the project will expropriate 54.25 acres of farmland overlapping with the road reserve area of the realigned route. The inventory of the dislocated farms is indicated in Appendix J, with the compensation cost estimates, covering the value of farmlands. A total of 34 farm plots and 18 buildings will be resettled.

9.7.12 Impact of borrow pits, quarries, detours and camp sites on the farmlands. The upgrading of the project road will require the use of a relatively large amount of gravel materials and crushed stones. Suitable gravel materials are available in 22 identified borrow pits, identified by the Soils and Materials study. The total surface of the borrow pits extends over 109 acres. Only one borrow pit located at Kitusha is likely to affect buildings and farm plots. The borrow pits will affects two acres in two farm plots and two houses. Other borrow pits are not located in the farmland area. The other borrow pits are owned by the government and are therefore individuals not eligible for compensation. However, Tanroads has to compensate for loss of farmlands to be affected by detours and campsites. The borrow pits recommended to obtain materials for subgrade and Base Course are shown below:

Annex 8.Part3 Annex 8 - 63 Techniplan Singida Shelut Road Detailed Engineering Design FinalReport: Annex 8 - EIA, SIA & RIA Part 3

Table 9.7: Proposedborrow pits

Borrow Pit Chainage Offset Quantity N. (km - Acres Code Series (ki) m side (m3) a b C d r f g h I NBP 1 1 0+750 25 L 56.000 6 2 NBP 2 2 2+500 15 L 48.000 5 3 NBP 3 6 15+100 5 L 66.500 7 4 BP7 7 20+200 2 R 15.000 2 5 NBP 5 10 25+500 2 L 150.000 15 6 NBP 7 12 29+200 4 L 45.000 5 7 NBP 10 14 33+300 15 L 23.000 2 8 NBP 11 15 34+000 5 L 56.000 6 9 NBP 13 17 37+700 5 L 37.000 4 10 BP 12 18 44+300 5 L 40.000 4 11 NBP 14 19 44+600 5 R 60.000 6 12 BP 17 B 21 59+000 5 L 45.000 5 13 NBP 16 22 61+600 25 L 75.000 8 14 NBP 17 23 63+600 5 R 40.000 4 15 BP 18 25 71+150 5 L 21.000 2 16 NBP 19 26 72+000 1 R 20.000 2 17 NBP 20 27 73+600 4 L 30.000 3 18 NBP 22 29 81+000 5 L 68.000 7 19 NBP 24 31 86+200 8 L 20.000 2 20 BP 23 32 86+500 2 R 18.000 2 21 NBP 25 33 86+600 2 L 60.000 6 22 BP 25 35 104+000 4 R 54.000 6 Total estimated volume of materials 1.047.500 109

Compensation criteria for borrow pits, stone quarries, detours and camp sites. The prevalent procedure where contractors pay a fixed sum to Village Committees and leave them to negotiate with individual farmers is not acceptable on the given rationale that land is owned by the Central Government. World Bank's OP 4.12 states that the project must compensate the people who permanently or temporarily loose access to land, regardless of whether they own it, due to borrow pits, quarries, camps and detours. Such people must be receiving an acceptable resettlement package, similarly to the people directly in the path of other physical works.

According to the Mining Act 1998, the proprietor for mining building materials has to apply for the licence before undertaking mining activities. In this case Tanroads, will apply for a licence for mining building materials. It is estimated that Tsh 5,000.000.00 will suffice for acquiring a mining licence. As the borrow pits and quarries are not located to the farmlands (except one at Kitusha village), Tanroads will pay a fee established under the local government authorities.In average the District authorities charges a fee of Tsh 300.00 per m3 extracted materials. It is estimated that, a lumpsum of Tsh 20,000,000.00 will be used to pay fees to the district authorities for extracting building materials. Some percentage of this fee will be left to the village government for other development sin respective village.

For the borrow pit located at Kitusha, the two plots to be affected will be compensated in terms of losing their buildings and farm plots as indicated in Appendix J.

It is assumed that the detours will not be longer than 1.5km and not more than 5 detours. The width of detours would approximately be lOm. It is therefore estimated that additional 30 acres

Annex 8-Part3 Annex 8 - 64 Techniplan Singida Shelui Road: Detailed Engineering Design Final Report: Annex 8 - EIA, SIA & RIA Part 3

are expected to be pre-empted for quarries, detours and campsites, with very minor, scattered impact on local farmlands. However, the detours and campsites will affect 10 farm plots of about 3 acres. The fartland owner will be compensated accordingly. The valuation will be undertaken later before construction of detours and campsites. However, it should be undertaken immediately after identifying detours and sites for camping. The compensation of lands/farms for detours and campsite will be enacted as stipulated in the Land Act. Currently the estimated amount for compensation is earmarked as indicated in the overall cost for relocation (Table 9.9)

9.7.13 Rangelands and forests. Rangelands of generally low stock-carrying capacity stretch along about a total of 50 km on both sides of the design route. While expropriated farmlands are compensated under the legislation in vigor, rangelands are not. In fact, they are not supposed to be under anybody's right of occupancy according to the existing legislation. Nevertheless, a compensation can be paid, through village authorities, to the stock-raising communities currently exploiting he grazing areas..

Compensation criteria of rangelands and forests. The use of rangelands and forests is entitled for compensation, even if no provision in such direction exists under Tanzanian law. OP 4.12 emphasises that affected people have a right to restore their use of land and access to assets regardless of whether they legally own that land. Access to pasture, medicinal plants, firewood, game etc. is all part of an individual's asset base and hence any project affecting such base needs to compensate for it. The solution does not simply consist in the payment of nominal cash sums. The plan, has rather tried to restore, to the extent possible, access to assets with the ultimate aim of restoring income and improving living standards. The earmnarked sum should be Sh 500,000.00 in line with World Bank guidelines on these matters

9.7.14 Relocation of Utilities.

Consultation with Tanzania Electric Supply Corporation (TANESCO), Water Authorities in Singida town as well as Tanzania Telecommunication Company Limited (TTCL) have been held and agree on the arrangement for relocation of utilities. A total length of 16km of service line comprising 320 poles of electric power line will be relocated. Minor water pipes servicing residential houses along 4km in Singida town and 100m at Shelui will be relocated. Telephone line for about 2km along Singida - Shelui road project will also be relocated. The cost for relocating these utilities has been indicated in the overall cost of relocation. (Table 9.9).

9.8 - Resettlement Measures

9.8.1 Affected owners. The owners of the houses, businesses and farms pre-empted for road construction purposes in collaboration with the local authorities and community leaders have preliminarily identified sites for relocation. The people to be resettled will receive timely notice and will be paid the full amounts related to: - the value of the buildings and other unexhausted physical developments, including the graves whenever they are attached to the homesteads according to local customary law - transport allowances for persons and goods to the resettlement sites - the value of the lost business income for the period required to re-start it elsewhere - the value of the crops and the cost of re-establishing the lost farm area nearby - Transport allowance

9.8.2 Integration with host population The consultations were conducted between the consultant and local community regarding the relocation. The entire relocated communities prefer to be relocated entirely within the existing community in their original villages.

Annex 8-Part3 Annex 8 - 65 Techniplan Singida Shelui Road: Detailed Engineenng Design Final Report: Annex 8- EIA, SIA & RIA Part 3

9.9 Site Selection, Site Preparation, Relocation and Social Services

All resettlement is local thus relocation is unlikely to cause major ressettlement impacts. The local communities involved in relocation are willing to be relocated in the nearest place. The meeting with the consultants, TANROADS officials, Government Valuer, local government officials including village government and the affected community were held and agree on the site to be relocated. Majority of the people to be displaced are willing to be relocated in their original village.

The village chairmen will allocate new plots to the isolated building owners and farmers inside the same villages, offering equal chance to exploit traffic-related business. The Town Planning Officers of Singida Rural and Iramba Districts will draft the urban resettlement plans for the collective relocation of the buildings of respectively Msisi Village and Shelui Nselembwe Trade Center. The Agricultural Extension Officer in collaboration with village authorities of Singida Rural and Iramba Districts will prepare plan for the farming community dislocated along Iguguno bypass. Both the urban and the agricultural resettlement plans will be drafted and the land made available before the houses are demolished and the farmlands destroyed.

Even though free plots are available in road-side villages, the relocation process may become a sensitive issue. In similar projects, expropriation disputes stem from disagreements on the value at which the estate and its improvements are to be compensated. As the government has undertaken detailed property valuation and compensation implementation schedule, it will improve the public perception of the project and reducing local resistance. To avoid mismanagement of compensation money, the relocation scheme should be countersigned before payment, enabling the displaced person to reconstruct his property as soon as he receives the money.

The people tQbe displaced were involved in the identification of the new sites for resettlement since they have ample area/land for shifting. In rare cases where affected ones do not have enough lands, the village government will allocate the area after the consent of displaced people. The cost for obtaining that land is Tsh 500 which is paid to the village government.

The local government and central government revenues will be used for provision of social services like water supply and electricity. These services will be provided to all communities regardless of affected community. The DPs will be given plots which are more better off than they are now. There should be a thorough consultation between the local governments, DPs, Local NGOs (World Vision) and Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Committee to decide on the allocation of plots

The displaced people (DPs) will built their own houses according to the design which can be accommodated with the funds provided as compensation. The local government will survey plots, service the plots by provision of infrastructures like water supply, street roads and other utilities.

9.10 Community Participation

Community Participation on RAP Implementation

During the preparation of the resettlement plan, the affected persons will be systematically informed and consulted about their options and rights. For such purpose regular meetings will be hold between Tanroads' officials and communities. The meetings shall be prepared and maintained with the participation of formal and informal leaders. Local NGOs (World Vision) will be contracted in order to ensure viable community participation and proper communication between affected persons and Tanroads officials. During such meetings the concerned DPs will

Annex 8-Part3 Annex 8 - 66 Techniplan Singida Shelui Road: Detailed Engineering Design Final Report: Annex 8 - EIA, SIA & RIA Part 3

be entitled to identify suitable plots and to reject any plot unacceptable to them. As soon as the RAP is cleared and finalised, Tanroads will formally disclose it to the affected people. For this purpose, Tanroads' Regional Manager will organize 12 final sessions, one in each of the Administrative Village Areas crossed by the road. The sessions will be chaired by the RAP specialist of Tanroads and attended by representatives of the higher territorial hierarchies (Districts and Sub-Districts). Adequate display materials will be utilized. During RAP implementation an M&E Committee will be established at regional level, with the participation of DPs (either directly or represented by local NGOs) and representatives from the Departments of Lands, Agriculture, Livestock, Forestry and Social Affairs.

9.11 Grievance and Appeals Channels: The RAP will make available to all concerned people including the appeal structures at various levels, specifying the responsible parties and their response time. Before starting, with the grievance sequence and where appropriate (i.e. in case of complaints of minor entity), aggrieved parties will take their complaints to community or traditional meetings for dispute resolution. Local NGO will be contracted and involved to hear complaints and attempt to effect a resolution before they enter the administrative appeals hierarchy. The appeals line will feature the following sequence:

i. Community or traditional meetings (with the presence of contracted NGOs) ii. Sub-District Authority iii. District Council (Land Officer and Agricultural Officer) iv. Tanroads v. District Court

In case of no resolution before entering the administrative appeal line, the response time of the administrative authorities (points ii. to iv. above) shall not exceed two weeks. If the grievance is accepted, the authorities shall compensate the travel expenses of the grievant at a rate to be defined by the Tanroads at the beginning of the resettlement and compensation process. No further appeals mechanism is advised beyond the local administrative level to avoid excessive costs for the grievant.

9.12 Implementation schedule

Displaced households and farmers will receive timely notice respectively to harvest the fields and salvage the frames, iron sheets or glasses from the buildings. Contractor Clauses will ensure that notices are readily served and discomfort is allayed. As discussed above Village chairmen will allocate new plots to the isolated building owners and farmers inside the same villages, offering equal chance to exploit traffic-related business. The Town Planning Officers of Singida Rural and Iramba Districts will draft the urban resettlement plans for the collective relocation of the buildings of respectively Msisi Village and Shelui Nselembwe Trade Center. The Agricultural Extension Officer in collaboration with village authorities of Singida Rural District will prepare plan for the farming community dislocated along Iguguno bypass. Both the urban and the agricultural resettlement plans will be drafted and the land made available before the houses are demolished and the farmlands destroyed.

The RAP will span a half year from the date on which the project is officially underway through the following administrative and fieldwork schedule. The rehabilitation of any stretch of the road cannot begin until all land has been formally acquired and resettlement completed and DPs relocated in location satisfactory to them.

Annex 8-Part3 Annex 8 - 67 Techniplan Singida Shelut Road: Detailed Engineering Design FinalReport: Annex 8 - EIA, SIA & RIA Part3

Table 9.8: Dislocationand resettlement schedule (2003-04)

Quarters since start-up date Framework operationsI 2 3 4 5 6

1 TANROADS: preparation of maps and report ' Transmission of maps and report to Ministry of X 2 Lands and Human Settlement Development, * comments

3 Location of alternative settlement by urban and ; r rural authorities 4 Ministry of Finance: mobilization of compensation funds Local Govemment: payment of compensation * money 7I -A- 6 Local Government: distribution of alternative _ _ _ plots _ 1

7 Start-up of physical resettlement operations *0 , 8 Monitoring and Evaluation e e * * * -

4After the six-month life of the resettlement operation, the monitoring and evaluation operation will continue on annual basis (as suggested by Op 4.12) supplemented by a mid term review and hence for a reasonable period after all resettlement and related development activities have been completed

Bar-charted operations need to be intensified towards the end of the period.

9.13 Costs and Budget

9.13.1 Overview. The individual resettlement cost has four main cost components, corresponding to:

* The value of the buildinz and ancillary structures or improvements to be destroyed within the right of way * The value of the business activities interrupted by the project * The value of land/farms to be affected by the project * The relocation costs, including transport and accommodation allowance.

A. Value of the buildings: Government Valuer in collaboration with District and Village authorities and the concerned house owners, has estimated the value of the buildings to be demolished. The estimates comply national legislation on the compensation and World Bank Operational Directives.

B. Compensation of business activities interrupted by the proiect: if a building is used for commercial purposes, the daily turnover have been estimated in order to compensate its loss for a given period, in addition to the compensation for the building structure and the transfer to other suitable premises. Taking into account existing laws and regulations a profit of 36 months has been calculated for business compensation..

C. Compensation for land/farms - The land/farmlands to be affected by realignment, detours, borrow pits and quarries will be compensated according to the Land Act 1999

Annex 8-Part3 Annex 8 - 68 Techniplan Singida Shelui Road: Detailed Engineering Design Final Report: Annex 8 - EIA, SIA & RIA Part 3

D. Relocation costs: It include transport and the provision of a land plot similar to the previous one. Transport costs will be minimal, as all families and businesses will be relocated in the same village or urban center. Transport costs can be compensated as stipulated in Land Act 1999.

9.13.2 Overall costs. The overall relocation costs is estimated at TSh. 516,542,000.00 equivalent to US$ 516, 600.00. The components for this relocation are categorized as follows:

- Compensation and resettlement of 113 buildings in the design right of way for a cost of TSh.128, 250,000.00 a sum adequate for the typology of buildings to be relocated (under the National legislation and WB rules for "full replacement cost");

- Compensation 3 acres farmlands to be affected by detour and camp sites at a cost of Tsh 1,500,000.00

- Compensation for range lands at a cost of Tsh 500,000.00

- License for mining building materials at a cost of Tshs. 5,000,000.00

- Fee to the local government for building materials at a cost of Tsh 20,000,000.00

- Monitoring and evaluation of RAP at a cost of Tshs 7,500,000.00

- Relocating of utilities at a cost of Tsh 320,000,000.00 Electricity - 170,000,000.00 Water Supply - 100,000,000.00 Telephone poles - 50,000,000.00

- Contingency (7%) at a cost of Tsh 33,792,500.00

Table 9.9: Summary budget of resettlement components of the project (in Tanzanian Sh.)

Component Resettlement costs Buildings, business and farmlands 128,250,000.00 Detours 1,500,000.00 Rangelands 500,000.00 Relocation of public utilities 320,000,000.00 Mining License 5,000,000.00 Fee to the local government for 20,000,000.00 building materials Workshops, meetings and M&E: 2,500,000.00 - Funds for Local NGOs efforts 2,500,000.00 - Funds for external monitoring 2,500,000.00 Sub-total 482,750,000.00 Inflation and contingency factor (7%) 33,792,500.00 GRAND TOTAL 516,542,500.00

Annex 8-Part3 Annex 8 - 69 Techniplan Singida Shelui Road: Detailed Engineering Design Final Report: Annex 8 - EIA, SIA & RIA Part 3

9.13.3 Financial schedule of RAP. The proposed financial schedule of the project's resettlement component is tabulated below. The funds will to be made available by the project. The contribution of the govemment will be in terms of the contribution of the govemment to the project.

Table 9:10 Summary budget of resettlement components of the project (in Tanzanian Sh.)

Resettlemen Source Monthly cash flow (from proect official start-up date) Component t costs of funds 1 1 2 r 3 4 5 | 6 1000 Sh Compensation for buildings, 128,250.00 Project 128,250 businesses and farrns Detours 1,500.00 Project 1,500 Rangelands 500.00 Project 500 Relocation of 320,000.00 Project 160,000 80,000 80,000

U tilities ______Licence 5,000.00 5,000 Fee for Building 20,000.00 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Materials Workshops, . meetings and -2,500.00 Project 300 300 800 300 400 400

M & E : ______- Funds for Local NGOs 2.500.00 Project 300 300 800 300 400 400 efforts______- Funds for external 2.500.00 Project 300 300 800 300 400 400 monitoring Sub-total 482,750.00 299,150. 5,900 82,400 7,900 81,200 6,200 Inflation and contingency 33,792.50 Project 5632 5632 5632 5632 5632 5632 factor (7%) . . GRAND 516,542 304,782 11,532 88,032 13,532 86,832 11,832

9. 14 RAP Institutional Framework and Organizational Responsibilities

This section provides (see Table..below ) a list of all agencies and institutions involved in each step of the resettlement process (preparation, appeals, implementation and monitoring). The experience of the majority of the actors involved seems to adequate to the tasks to be carried out and therefore no particular capacity building measures are required.

As soon as the RAP is cleared and finalised, Tanroads will formally disclose it to the affected people. For this purpose, Tanroads will organize 10 sessions, one in each of the Adrministrative Village Areas crossed by the road. The sessions will be chaired by the RAP specialist of

Annex 8-Part3 Annex 8 - 70 Techniplan Singida Shelui Road: Detailed Engineering Design FinalReport: Annex 8 - EIA, SIA & RIA Part 3

Tanroads and attended by representatives of the higher territorial hierarchies (Districts and Division/Wards). Adequate display materials will be utilized.

TANROADS will provide to the Ministry of Land and Human Settlement Development: (a) the topographic maps at scale 1:2000 of the design road reserve area, and: (b) a report on the buildings and farming plots which presently exist within the design right of way. TANROADS will also prepare the list of the occupants dispossessed by the project, specifying their rights of occupancy and the assessed value. The Local Government (i.e District Councils) will dispatch the dislocation notices to the concerned households and farmers.

Ministry of finance through Tanroads will disburse the compensation funds to the district council to pay the communities eligible for compensation.. After the effect of the compensation and resettlement the communities will be given two months for resettlement. TANROADS will then authorize the Contractor to start demolition works.

In the project area it was found that the effective NGO in the area is World Vision. This NGO will assist in raising public awareness on resettlement and facilitate local community participation in RAP implementation, conflict resolution etc

Annex 8-Part3 Annex 8 - 71 Techniplan Singida Shelui Road: Detailed Engineering Design Final Report: Annex 8 - EIA, SIA & RIA Pari 3

Table 9 11 RAP InsutruuionalFramework and Organizati nal Responsibilities Steps Agencies involved Activities to be carried out Provide the Ministry of Land and Human Settlement Development with. a Topographic maps at scale 1 2000 of the design road reserve area Tanroads b. Report on buildings and farmung plots existing within the nght of way c Valuation report approval Ministry of Land and Human Approval of the valuation report Settlement Development

Concemed administrations Identify, allocate and make available the alternative plots as follows.

Identify and allocate altemative plots for building ownwers, farmers RAP Preparation Village Chairmen inside the villages and businessmen within Singida Rural and Iramba Districts Town Planning Officers of Draft urban resettlement plans for the collective relocation of the buildings Singida Rural and Iramba Distncts of Msisi village and Shelui- Nselembre Trade Center Prepare the resettlement plan for the famung community dislocated along Agnicultural extension Officers of Iguguno bypass, borrow pits, detour and camp sites and minor Singida Rural and Iramba Distncts realignments Ministry of Land and Human Dispatch the dislocation notices to the concemed households, Settlement Development businessmen and farmers Organize and maintain regular and final meetings dunng RAP preparation TANROADS

Hear complaints of a DPs and attemnpt to effect a resolution dunng Local NGOs community or traditional meetings before the complaints enter the administrative appeals huerarchy. Wards Authonty Receive and give solution to gnevances before Grievance and Distnct Council (Land Officer and Receive and give solution to gnevances before appeals Agncultural Officer)

Regional Engineer of Receive and give solution to grievances before TANROADS Distnct Court Receive and give solution to gnevances before Concerned administrations Deliver to the dislocated persons the agreed compensation sums and the new land plots Local Govemment Built urban infrastructures for the new plots TANROADS Authonze the Contractor to start demolition works RAP RAP implementation and organization of meetings with communities and Implementation TANROADS affected people Formal and Informal Village Participation to the RAP implementation meetings Leaders Local NGOs Ensure viable community participation and proper communication between affected persons and Tanroads officials

M& E Commuttees composed of (a) Identify problem cases ensunng they are dealt with Monitoring and .Departments of Lands, Evaluation (dunng Agnculture, Livestock, Forestry (b) Contnbute to the database formiung part of the overall evaluation of the the 6 months and Social Affairs, Tanroads' resettlement program period of RAP Regional Office (as Secretary) ( E implementation (c) Ensure proper partcipation of DPs m the RAP process. and beyond) Local NGOs Ensure proper participation of DPs Extemal monitonng Perform independent monitonng and evaluation tasks

Annex 8-Part3 Annex 8 - 72 Techniplan Singida Shelul Road: Detailed Engineering Design FinalReport: Annex 8 - EIA, SIA & RIA Part3

9.15 Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) of RAP (including Post-resettlement Monitoring).

The institutional structure responsible for overseeing the implementation of the Resettlement Master Plan should include skills for regular internal monitoring of the compensation and relocation procedures. Such monitoring will serve two functions: (a) identify problem cases ensuring they are dealt with, and: (b) contribute to the database forming part of the overall evaluation of the resettlement program (c) ensure proper participation of DPs in the RAP process. Besides internal monitoring, there will be provision for regular external M&E by a neutral qualified party such as a university department. The M&E lines of responsibility will involve the regional authorities. A M&E Committee will be established at regional level, with the participation of DPs (either directly or represented by local NGOs) and representatives from the Departments of Lands, Agriculture, Livestock, Forestry and Social Affairs. Representative from Tanroads Regional Manager act as Secretary of the Comrmittee. The Committee shall review the RAP-related work.. It will meet at least three times over the six-month plan performance period, upon summoned by the Regional Manager of Tanroads. After the six- month life of the resettlement operation, the monitoring and evaluation operation will continue on annual basis (as suggested by Op 4.12) supplemented by a mid termn review and hence for a reasonable period after all resettlement and related development activities have been completed. The M&E activities of the institutional structure will be supplemented by a independent qualified party such as a university department.

Annex 8-Part3 Annex 8 - 73 Techniplan