Operation Redwing

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Operation Redwing MARSHALL ISLANDS FILE TRACKING DOCUMENT Record Number: File Name (TITLE): Document Nu,mber (ID): h / / - / 31 / Previous Location (FROM): L?/e - AUTHOR: Addditional Information: .F OrMIbox: ,0 CyMBox: /z. WT-1311 (EX) EXTRACTED VERSlOh OPERATION REDWING Project 2.2 --L_/ Gamma Exposure Rate Versus Time Pacific Proving Grounds May - July 1956 Headquarters Field Command Defense Atomic Support Agency Sandia Base, Albuquerque, New Mexico January 18, 1960 NOTICE This is an extract of WT-1311, Operation REDWING, Project 2.2, which remains classified SECRET/FORMERLY RESTRICTED DATA as of this date. Extract version prepared for: Director DEFENSE NUCLEAR AGENCY Washington, D.C. 20305 15 May 1981 I I i _ _I _I.Y L : ..-. ~, c”,\,, y CL*\:11 1c*itci* or THIS I’ALL I?>.” C.,. L” I.,. d, - --- -- --------- .~ -______ _______.-.~__ _. - - __-.-- -------- REPORT D3CU\!EH-l-A-lIO)-(PAGE READ IKSTRUCTIONS tiEFORE CCAIPLE.7 INC FORU .--__ ---..--A ----- .-_- __ ~*~~~T-;tiYrerR 1 COVT *cccs~IowMC 1. RECIPIINT’S CATALOG NUNBLR -- WT-1311 (EX) - __.c__ -.-_ _li __---____ ,,T,TLE f.-.d Lbflfla) S. TYPE OF REPORT L PERIOD COVERED Operation REDWING - Project 2.2 Gama Exposure Rate Versus Time -.-- - L. PERFoRuIWC ORG. REPORT HUUBER --- WT-1311 (EX) ~iXiZZ9J 1. CONT.%ACT OR GRANT NIJMBCR(~J - P. Brown 8. Markow G. Carp R. Marmiroli -- -~ -. ,. ,-ERFORUING ORGANIZATION NAUE *NO ADDRESS IO. PROGRAM ELEMENT. PROJECT. TASK AREA b WORK UNIT NUMBERS U.S. Army Signal Research and Develop Laboratory Fort Monmouth, New Jersey ._--- -- .__--.-- _..__~.__ ,_ C~HTROLLIWG OFFICE NAUE AN0 ADDRESS 12. REPORT DATE Headquarters Field Command January 18, 1960 - .__-_ --.- Defense Atomic Support Agency 13. NUMBER OF PAGES Sandia Base, Albuquerque, New Mexico IS. SECURITY CLASS. (of rhl. r.pwfJ Unclassified ~_~ 15a.OECLASSIFICATION~OO~NGRAOlNG SCHEDULE .__ ._._______ .--- -~-___- 6. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (or rhl. R.port) Approved for public release; unlimited distribution. ~__~______.. ----.- ___._.~~ .- --. -.--~_____._ __ 1. DISTRII~UTION STATEMENT (of Ihe .brtr.cl .r:tr,rd In Dltick 70. II diflcrml lrom R.porr) ~.. _..~_ .__ .__ ..___ ___ .._. --- 8. SUPPLCUENTAR’~ HOTES [his report has had the classified information ren:ovedand has been republished in unclassified forinfor public release. This work was performed by Kaman Tempo under sontract DNAOOl-79-C-0455 with the close cooperation of the Classification 'lanarJcmentDivision of the Defense Nuclear Agency. _~ .~ _.~- ~- _ 9 r(f_Y vo,‘“S (Conlinu. on ,C\.,)rC .id. ,I,,r<r...v .~>b:dcr;,//y Ly Llock nu:t.r\ Operation REDWING Initial-Gamma Radiation Residual-Gamma Radiation Hydrodynamic Effect - ----- _-______ _____________ -_.- ------- ---- ------ -- ~. -___- ,- '3D LOITIOW OF 1 HOV LS IS CkSOCLTE U'lCLASSIFIED . ._- -- _____.__.. -~__~__.._____--.~- FORERORD This report has had classified material removed in order to . make the information available on an unclassified, open publication basis, to any interested parties. This effort to declassify this report has been accomplished specifically to support the Department of Defense Nuclear Test Personnel Review (I;TPR) Program. The objective is to facilitate studies of the low levels of radiation received by scme individuals during the at;;iosphericnuclear test program by r;;ckingas much information as pcssible availzble to all interested parties. The rr:aterialk:hich has been deleted is all currently classified as Restricted Dita or Fcrmerly Restricted Data under the provision .of the Atomic Energy Act of 1354, (as azended) or is I\'ztionalSecurity Inforr7,ation. This report has been reproduced directly from available ccpies of the original material. The locations from which ;;aterial has been deleted is generally obvious by the spacings 2nd "iloles" in the text. Thus the context of the material deleted is identified to assist the reader in the determination of ;;hether the deleted information is germane to his study. It is the belief of the individuals klho have participated in pt-c-paringthis t-c-portby deleting the c'lassified material end of l_he Defense Kucleur Agency that the report accurately portrays the contents of the original and that the deleted r;,aterialis of little or no significance to studies into the c;sounts or types of radiation received by any individuals curing the atmospheric nuclear test program. SUMMARY OF SHOT GATA.OF'ERATIOh REDWl!& ----5----- I . u 33 29 56% 21 18 ll 37 2L 162 19 I.3 3.l37 I+1 162 21 52 ll ?C 3: l62 I.301 u /.r 52 165 23 l.3 ll 33 ac c 162 21 93 u 37 21 162 19 32 u 32 ka 162 21 39 xl 37 53 16218 o/. II 40 22 165 4 l3 ll 37 39 162 ie ~9 11 C\ 17 162 li 01 n 39 ba 165 23 u ll LO 26 l65 20 22 u .G 19 I62 12 09 i 6 . I Atrukll)l cnmc Alruklruu Peter Aomosn George Arrtlkan Yoke Blglren Ibg-er Blklnl Bow Bikini Atoll. Locations of test dctonatiol- ,.s during Operation Redwing are indicated by large !ettering and arro??:s. Native island names with corresponding military identifizs arc given in the tabulation. 5 KICKAPOO YUYA War7 Kat. Eltwr wllms lrrla Eniwetok Atoll. Locations of test detonations during Operation Redwing are indicated by large lettering and arrows. Native island names with corresponding military identifiers are given in the tabulation. 6 .- The primary objective of Project 2.2 was to measure initiai- and residual-gamma- exposure rates as a function of time at various distances from high-yield-thermonuclear detonations. Secondary objectives were to measure the residual gamma-exposure rate at the lip of the crater from a high-yield, land-surface shot; and to field test a protot_ype thermal detector to be used in a radiological-defense-warning system. The residuul-gamma radiation was detected by an unsaturated-ion chamber, whose output determined the frequency of pulses that v.:ere recorded 011electro-sensitive paper. Most of the initial-gamma-radiation stations consisted of scintillation detectors whose output determined the frequency of pulses that were recorded on magnetic tape. Some initial-gamma instruments were similar to those used during Operation Castle. The exposure rate near the crater was measured with a detector-telemeter unit dropped from a helicopter. Residual-gamma-exposure rate versus time was obtained after Shots Zuni, Flathead, Navajo, and Tewa. The observed average-decay exponents for these events were 1.1 for Zuni and Tcwa, 1.2 for Flathead, and 1.3 for PLvajo. In some cases, the effect of rain- fall in leaching the activity dccrensed the exposure rate by a factor of two. Records from Shot Flathead at 7,730 fecr and from Shot Navajo at 13,870 feet indicated that at these locations about 2/3 of the tot:11 initial-gamma e,xposure was delivered after the arrival of the shock front. The crater-lip measurements indicated that the method was a feasible one; however, no usable data was obtained. The thermal-radiation detector res;)on:!ed satisfactority to a detonation at a distance of 20 miles. This report presents the final results of one of the projects participating in the military- effect programs of Operation Redwing. Overall information about #is and the other military-effect projects can be obtained from WT - 1344, the “Summary Report of the Commander, Task Lnlt 3.” This technical summary includes: (1) tables listing each detonation with its yield, type, environment, meteorological conditions, etc.; (2) maps showing shot locations; (3) discussions of results by programs; (4) summaries of objec- tives, procedures, results, etc., for 311 projects; and (5) a listing of project reports for the military-effect programs. ABST~CT____________________________-__----------_-___ 7 CB_@TER 1 INTRODUC~O~___________ _______.- -______ _______ 13 1.1 Objectives____________________________-----_-_______ 13 1.2 Background_________-_______________________________ 13 1.3 Thsory___________~__________________-___-_________ 13 1.3.1 Initial-Gamma Radiation _ I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 14 1.3.2 Residual_Gdn:ma Radiation _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 14 1.3.3 Absorption in _Jir- _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _.__ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ __ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ 15 1.3.4 Bydrodynynt:mic Effect ___I______ _____________________ 16 CHAPTER 2 PR~~~~~UR~-____~_~-~~-~~~~~~~~~~--~------~~~~ 16 2.1 Operations -___-_-_--_-- _______ _____- _--__ ___________ 16 2.2 Instrumentation -___- ______ _ _______ ___________________ 18 2.2.1 The Residual instrument System, Courad I Detector - - - - - - - - - - - 18 2.2.2 Residual lnstrument System Recorder - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 21 2.2.3 Initial Instrument System, Gustave I Detector- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 22 2.2.4 Photomultiplier Feedback Circuit, lnitial Instrument ~y~~~~~-~~_____-~__~~_~~_~~~-~~~~--~-~~---~-~ 22 2.2.5 ~~~~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-~~~~~--~~~---~-------------- 22 2.2.6 Righ-Range Initial-Gatnma Station Calibration - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 25 2.:: Readout Error tid Accuracy of the Gustave and ^ ConradSystems _________ _ _____ ________-________ 25 2.4 Beach-Ball-Radiation-Detector-Telemeter Unit- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 26 2.5 Thermal_RadiatianDctector __-___ -___________________---- 27 CHAPTER 3 RESULTS XND DISCUSSION ------------------------- 28 3.1 Residual-Radiation Measurements- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 28 3.2 Initial-Radiation 9easurements - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 43 3.3 Beach-Ball Measurements__-____-_- _____ ____-__-_____-__ 49 3.4 Thermal-Raifiatlc,n Detector- - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ 49 CHAPTER 4 CONC~,~S1O~S..___-_-__--___-----___---____-____
Recommended publications
  • 148 Part 3—Adjudication
    § 2.8 38 CFR Ch. I (7–1–20 Edition) a brief summary of each recommenda- PART 3—ADJUDICATION tion for relief and its disposition. Prep- aration of the report shall be the re- Subpart A—Pension, Compensation, and sponsibility of the General Counsel. Dependency and Indemnity Com- (c) The authority to grant the equi- pensation table relief, referred to in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, has not been GENERAL delegated and is reserved to the Sec- Sec. retary. Recommendation for the cor- 3.1 Definitions. rection of administrative error and for 3.2 Periods of war. appropriate equitable relief therefrom 3.3 Pension. 3.4 Compensation. will be submitted to the Secretary, 3.5 Dependency and indemnity compensa- through the General Counsel. Such rec- tion. ommendation may be initiated by the 3.6 Duty periods. head of the administration having re- 3.7 Individuals and groups considered to sponsibility for the benefit, or of any have performed active military, naval, or concerned staff office, or by the Chair- air service. man, Board of Veterans Appeals. When 3.10 Dependency and indemnity compensa- tion rate for a surviving spouse. a recommendation for relief under 3.11 Homicide. paragraph (a) or (b) of this section is 3.12 Character of discharge. initiated by the head of a staff office, 3.12a Minimum active-duty service require- or the Chairman, Board of Veterans ment. Appeals, the views of the head of the 3.13 Discharge to change status. administration having responsibility 3.14 Validity of enlistments. for the benefit will be obtained and 3.15 Computation of service.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Summary Site Profile for the Pacific Proving Grounds
    Draft ADVISORY BOARD ON RADIATION AND WORKER HEALTH National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health REVIEW OF THE SUMMARY SITE PROFILE FOR THE PACIFIC PROVING GROUNDS Contract No. 200-2009-28555 SCA-TR-SP2013-0040, Revision 1 Prepared by U. Hans Behling, PhD, CHP S. Cohen & Associates 1608 Spring Hill Road, Suite 400 Vienna, VA 22182 November 2013 Disclaimer This document is made available in accordance with the unanimous desire of the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (ABRWH) to maintain all possible openness in its deliberations. However, the ABRWH and its contractor, SC&A, caution the reader that at the time of its release, this report is pre- decisional and has not been reviewed by the Board for factual accuracy or applicability within the requirements of 42CFR82. This implies that once reviewed by the ABRWH, the Board’s position may differ from the report’s conclusions. Thus, the reader should be cautioned that this report is for information only and that premature interpretations regarding its conclusions are unwarranted. Effective Date: Revision No. Document No. Page No. November 5, 2013 1 (Draft) SCA-TR-SP2013-0040 2 of 65 Document No. S. COHEN & ASSOCIATES: SCA-TR-SP2013-0040 Technical Support for the Advisory Board on Effective Date: Radiation & Worker Health Review of Draft – November 5, 2013 NIOSH Dose Reconstruction Program Revision No. 1 Review of the Summary Site Profile for the Pacific Page 2 of 65 Proving Grounds Supersedes: Task Manager: Rev. 0 (Draft) __________________________ Date:____________ U. Hans Behling, PhD, MPH Project Manager: Peer Reviewer(s): John Mauro John Stiver __________________________ Date:____________ John Stiver, CHP Record of Revisions Revision Effective Description of Revision Number Date 0 (Draft) 10/21/2013 Initial issue 1 (Draft) 11/05/2013 Revised Finding 1.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Nuclear Tests, July 1945 Through
    This document is made available through the declassification efforts and research of John Greenewald, Jr., creator of: The Black Vault The Black Vault is the largest online Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document clearinghouse in the world. The research efforts here are responsible for the declassification of hundreds of thousands of pages released by the U.S. Government & Military. Discover the Truth at: http://www.theblackvault.com DOE/NV-- 209-REV 15 December 2000 nited States Nuclear Tests July 1945 through September 1992 U.S. Department of Energy Nevada Operations Office DTIC QUALITY INSPECTED 3 This publication supersedes DOE/NV-209, Rev. 14, dated December 1994. This publication has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available for public sale, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Commerce National Technology Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 Phone: 800.553.6847 Fax: 703.605.6900 Email: [email protected] Online ordering: http://www.ntis.gov/ordering.htm Available electronically at http://www.doe.gov.bridge Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062 Phone: 865.576.8401 Fax: 865.576.5728 Email: [email protected] Pictured on the front cover is Sedan Crater. Sedan Crater was formed when a 104 kiloton explosive buried under 635 feet of desert alluvium was fired at the Nevada Test Site on July 6, 1962, displacing 12 million tons of earth.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 March Newsletter
    Members’NAAV Publication of the National AssociationNEWS of Atomic Veterans Volume 1 March, 2015 Issue 2 Veterans you might need us-we might need you. We are especially looking for veterans during and after the first Gulf War. U. S. Navy photo by Mass Communication DoD photo by U.S. Navy. (Released) U. S. Navy photo by Robert Ruyle, RM2 Specialist Seaman Aboard the USS Navasota (AO-106) Refueling Patrick Dionne/Released Operation Red Wing Ships All crew members on All Nuclear ships, a veteran that might fit the above criteria. If they submarines and any on ships using CWS (Sea have any questions on how we can support, lead, Whiz System) and any military in contact with or provide assistance have them give Gillie a call depleted uranium. We are looking for those who at 804-334-8585 and he will get them in contact may have been x-ray technicians, those assigned with a state commander. Also, make sure that they to Enewetak Atoll radiation clean up, as these “check out” www.naav.com/html/documents.htm. fit the VA’s official description as Occupational radiation exposed veterans. Any military (Army, Let’s get the word out that NAAV has been Air Force, Marines, Coast Guard and Navy who serving Atomic Veterans since 1979. Cold War were in any way involved in the assembly, storage Vets that may have been involved in radiation and deployment of nuclear weapon devices or the exposure events. We can help with information, surviving (spouse, or child) of a deceased Atomic support and guidance with government Veteran.
    [Show full text]
  • Atomic Testing Photographs
    ATOMIC TESTING PHOTOGRAPHS PHOTO No. DESCRIPTION TRINITY Event - The TRINITY Test was the first atomic test conducted by the United States. This test was detonated at Alamogordo, New Mexico on July 16, 1945. XX-31 TRINITY Event - The first nuclear test ever conducted. The TRINITY Event, a 19-kiloton tower test, was exploded July 16, 1945 in NM. XX-18 TRINITY Event - Los Alamos, NM, the TRINITY fireball, 15 seconds after detonation of the first atomic bomb on July 16, 1945, rises into the air above the desert near the town of San Antonio, NM. XX-120 TRINITY Event - Los Alamos, NM, the fireball of the TRINITY explosion, .053 seconds after detonation, as it shook the desert near the town of San Antonio, NM, 16 July 1945. XX-104 Operation Crossroads, ABLE Event - First atomic bomb test at Bikini Lagoon, ABLE Day, 30 June 1946. The photograph shows the radioactive cloud still boiling up toward its maximum height of about 35,000 feet. XX-121 Operation Crossroads, ABLE Event - The ABLE Event, mushroom cloud attaining a height of 5 miles after the ABLE test explosion at Bikini; ABLE test was one of the Crossroads series, 30 June 1946.. XX-111 Operation Crossroads, BAKER Event - The BAKER Test was detonated on the Bikini Atoll on 24 July 1946. XX-71 Operation Crossroads, BAKER Event - Bikini BAKER Day, the mushroom cloud and first stages of the base surge following the underwater BAKER explosion at Bikini; water is beginning to fall back from the column into the lagoon, 24 July 1946. XX-113 Operation Sandstone - Atom bomb tests at Enewetak, Marshall Islands, April and May 1948, Operation Sandstone.
    [Show full text]
  • Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Testing
    Battlefi eld of the Cold War The Nevada Test Site Volume I Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Testing 1951 - 1963 United States Department of Energy Of related interest: Origins of the Nevada Test Site by Terrence R. Fehner and F. G. Gosling The Manhattan Project: Making the Atomic Bomb * by F. G. Gosling The United States Department of Energy: A Summary History, 1977 – 1994 * by Terrence R. Fehner and Jack M. Holl * Copies available from the U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave. S.W., Washington, DC 20585 Attention: Offi ce of History and Heritage Resources Telephone: 301-903-5431 DOE/MA-0003 Terrence R. Fehner & F. G. Gosling Offi ce of History and Heritage Resources Executive Secretariat Offi ce of Management Department of Energy September 2006 Battlefi eld of the Cold War The Nevada Test Site Volume I Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Testing 1951-1963 Volume II Underground Nuclear Weapons Testing 1957-1992 (projected) These volumes are a joint project of the Offi ce of History and Heritage Resources and the National Nuclear Security Administration. Acknowledgements Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Testing, Volume I of Battlefi eld of the Cold War: The Nevada Test Site, was written in conjunction with the opening of the Atomic Testing Museum in Las Vegas, Nevada. The museum with its state-of-the-art facility is the culmination of a unique cooperative effort among cross-governmental, community, and private sector partners. The initial impetus was provided by the Nevada Test Site Historical Foundation, a group primarily consisting of former U.S. Department of Energy and Nevada Test Site federal and contractor employees.
    [Show full text]
  • US Department of Energy Albuquerque Operations Office Film
    U.S. Department of Energy Albuquerque Operations Office Film Declassification Project Video Tape Fact Sheets Updated September 2000 Released by Nevada Operations Office Coordination & Information Center Operated by Bechtel Nevada Under Contract DE-AC08-96NV11718 Film Declassification Project - Video Tape Fact Sheets Summary Information The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Albuquerque Operations Office, in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), is committed to making available to the public historically significant films describing various aspects of the U.S. nuclear weapons development program. The process of declassifying these films is an ongoing task. The film footage is available on video tape in three formats: VHS ($10.00 each plus shipping and handling); beta ($80-$100 each plus shipping and handling); and VHS PAL ($40.00 each plus shipping and handling). All payment must be made by check or money order in U.S. dollars, payable to Bechtel Nevada. The enclosed fact sheets provide information on each video. The video listing and fact sheets can also be found on the Internet at: http//www.nv.doe.gov under “News & Publications” and the subheading “Historical Nuclear Weapons Test Films.” To purchase these videos or obtain additional information, please contact: U.S. DOE/Nevada Operations Office - Public Reading Facility Bechtel Nevada P. O. Box 98521 M/S NLV040 Las Vegas, NV 89193-8521 Telephone: 1-877-DOE-FILM (1-877-363-3456) (Toll Free) or (702) 295-1628 Facsimile: (702) 295-1624 E-mail: [email protected] iii Table of Contents Listing or Number Page 0800000 - NUCLEAR TESTING REVIEW ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Testing
    MATERIALS IN THE EISENHOWER LIBRARY HOLDINGS RELATING TO NUCLEAR TESTING Introduction The Eisenhower Library holds a large quantity of documentation pertaining to nuclear testing and nuclear weapons policy in general. Some of this is readily located under headings such as “Atomic Energy Commission” or “Nuclear Testing.” Much of this information, however, is found within chronologically arranged files and considerable searching onsite is necessary to cover this topic thoroughly. A considerable portion of the relevant documentation is security classified, either in full or in part, and therefore remains closed to research. However, a substantial quantity of documentation has been opened and researchers can find useful information on nuclear testing, radiation and related topics in the Library’s holdings. This guide lists and briefly describes nuclear related materials by major collection with the emphasis on nuclear testing, fallout, radiation, and national and international concerns and discussions of these topics. A. DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER’S PAPERS AS PRESIDENT (Ann Whitman file) 1. Administration Series. Boxes 4-5, Atomic Energy Commission. The place to begin most nuclear policy related research projects is probably Boxes 4-5 which contain 25 file folders entitled “Atomic Energy Commission” covering the period 1953-61. These folders contain numerous letters from Lewis Strauss and John McCone to the president, presidential letters and statements, memoranda of conversation, reports, and printed material. Subjects include underwater tests, nuclear tests in the Pacific and in Nevada with correspondence detailing tests and their purposes with a few references to forces mobilized at proving grounds. Also found here is the report “Human Effects of Nuclear Weapons Development” issued in November 1956 and a memorandum of the President’s meeting with the committee which produced the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Atomvåbenproduktion I USA Af Holger Terp, Fredsakademiet Det Atomvåbenindustrielle Kompleks I USA Er Så Vidt Jeg Ved Det
    Atomvåbenproduktion i USA Af Holger Terp, Fredsakademiet Det atomvåbenindustrielle kompleks i USA er så vidt jeg ved det, ikke beskrevet på dansk. Atompolitikken i Danmark har lige siden 1945 beskæftiget sig generelt med atomfy- sik1, og atomvåben - eksempelvis deres udstationering og de forskellige opfattelser af, hvordan denne politik har påvirket vores allesammens sikkerhed.2 Men der er ingen her til lands der har beskrevet de miner, hvor råmaterialerne til ker- nevåbenproduktion var, fabrikkerne der fremstillede atomvåben, styrelserne der traf og stadig træffer beslutningerne herom i dybeste hemmelighed, atomvåbenforsøgene, samt deres menneskelige, miljømæssige og økonomiske omkostninger. 1 Issaacson, Walter: Einstein : Hans liv og univers. Gyldendal, 2006. - 742 s. : ill. 2 National Security Archive: How Many and Where Were the Nukes? What the U.S. Government No Longer Wants You to Know about Nuclear Weapons During the Cold War. National Security Archive Elec- tronic Briefing Book No. 197, 2006l. National Security Archive:U.S. Strategic Nuclear Policy: A Video History, 1945-2004 : Sandia Labs Historical Video Documents History of U.S. Strategic Nuclear Policy, 2011. Air Force Special Film Project 416, "Power of Decision". Produced by Air Photographic and Charting Ser- vice. Circa 1958, For Official Use Only. Source: Digital copy prepared by National Archives and Records Administration Motion Pictures Unit, Record Group 342, Department of the Air Force. Wittner, Lawrence S.: The Struggle Against the Bomb, I-III. Stanford University Press, 1993, 1997 & 2003. 1 Jeg fik ideen til projektet for et lille års tid siden og der mangler formodentlig meget endnu. Det følgende er derfor smagsprøver på en meget omfattende og kompleks historie, der meget gerne må kommenteres og debatteres.
    [Show full text]
  • The Newsletter for America's Atomic Veterans
    United States Atmospheric & Underwater Atomic Weapon Activities National Association of Atomic Veterans, Inc. 1945 “TRINITY“ “Assisting America’s Atomic Veterans Since 1979” ALAMOGORDO, N. M. Website: www.naav.com E-mail: [email protected] 1945 “LITTLE BOY“ HIROSHIMA, JAPAN R. J. RITTER - Editor March, 2011 1945 “FAT MAN“ NAGASAKI, JAPAN 1946 “CROSSROADS“ BIKINI ISLAND 1948 “SANDSTONE“ ENEWETAK ATOLL 1951 “RANGER“ NEVADA TEST SITE 1951 “GREENHOUSE“ ENEWETAK ATOLL 1951 “BUSTER – JANGLE“ NEVADA TEST SITE 1952 “TUMBLER - SNAPPER“ NEVADA TEST SITE 1952 “IVY“ ENEWETAK ATOLL 1953 “UPSHOT - KNOTHOLE“ NEVADA TEST SITE 1954 “CASTLE“ BIKINI ISLAND 1955 “TEAPOT“ NEVADA TEST SITE 1955 “WIGWAM“ OFFSHORE SAN DIEGO 1955 “PROJECT 56“ NEVADA TEST SITE 1956 “REDWING“ ENEWETAK & BIKINI 1957 “PLUMBOB“ NEVADA TEST SITE 1958 “HARDTACK-I“ ENEWETAK & BIKINI 1958 “NEWSREEL“ JOHNSON ISLAND 1958 “ARGUS“ SOUTH ATLANTIC 1958 “HARDTACK-II“ NEVADA TEST SITE 1961 “NOUGAT“ NEVADA TEST SITE 1962 “DOMINIC-I“ CHRISTMAS ISLAND JOHNSON ISLAND 1965 “FLINTLOCK“ AMCHITKA, ALASKA 1969 “MANDREL“ AMCHITKA, ALASKA 1971 “GROMMET“ AMCHITKA, ALASKA 1974 “POST TEST EVENTS“ AMCHITKA, ALASKA ------------ “ IF YOU WERE THERE, DRILLING DEEP SHAFTS FOR NUCLEAR WEAPON TESTS YOU ARE AN ATOMIC VETERAN “ The Newsletter for America’s Atomic Veterans COMMANDERS COMMENTS Well now, here we are three months into our 31st. year of assisting America’s Atomic D. D. Robertson ( MO ) G. H. Schwartz ( VA ) Veteran community. Collectively, we have W. E. Aubry ( MA ) R. C. Callentine ( TX ) been striving to gain full recognition and J. N. Levesque ( ME ) F. G. Howard ( FL ) ( where applicable ) ample compensation for T. F. Zack ( CA ) T. H. Rose ( MD ) those who stood before an invisible enemy, J.
    [Show full text]
  • OPERATION PLUMBBOB Technical Summary of Mi I Itar Y Effects, Programs 1-9
    EXTRACTED VERSION OPERATION PLUMBBOB Technical Summary of Mi I itar y Effects, Programs 1-9 Defense Atomic Support Agency Sandia Base, Albuquerque, New Mexico 15 August 1962 Nevada Test Site May-Octo ber 1957 NOTICE This is an extract of WT-1445, Operation PLUMBBOB, Technical ~ Summary of Military Effects, Programs 1-9, which remqins classified SECRET/RESTRlCTED DATA as of this date. .:.*? f i~ i-' Extract version prepared for: Director DEFE~SENUCLEAR A~ENCY ~ distribution unlimited, P Washington, ~ D.C. 20305 1 October 1979 FOREWORD This report has had classified material removed in order to make the information available on an unclassified. open publication basis, to any interested parties. This effort to declassify this report has been accomplished specifically to support the Department of Defense Nuclear Test Personnel Review (NTPR) Program. The objective is to facilitate studies of the low levels of radiation received by some individuals during the atinospheric nuclear test program by making as nuch information as possible available to all interested parties. The material which has been deleted is all currently classified as Restricted Data or Formerly Restricted Data under the provision of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954. (as amecded) or is Yational Security Information. This report has been reproduced directly from available copies of the original material. The locations from which material has been deleted is generally obvious by the spacings dlid "holes" in the text. Thus the context of the material riL-!?ted is identified to assist the redder in the determination of ahether the deleted information is germane to his study. It is the belief of the individuals who have participated in preparing this report by deleting the classified material and of the Defense Uuclear Agency that the report accurately portrays the contents of the original and that the deleted jnaterial is of little or no significance to studies into the mounts or types of radiation received by any individuals during the atmospheric nuclear test program.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Nuclear Tests July 1945 Through September 1992
    DOE/NV--209-REV 16 September 2015 United States Nuclear Tests July 1945 through September 1992 U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office This publication supersedes DOE/NV--209, Rev. 15, dated December 2000. This publication has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available for sale to the public from: U.S. Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service 5301 Shawnee Road Alexandria, VA 22312 Telephone: 800.553.6847 Fax: 703.605.6900 E-mail: [email protected] Online Ordering: http://www.ntis.gov/help/ordermethods.aspx Available electronically at http://www.osti.gov/scitech Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062 Phone: 865.576.8401 Fax: 865.576.5728 Email: [email protected] Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof or its contractors or subcontractors. Front cover photos Top: Baker was the third nuclear test conducted by the United States at Bikini Atoll on July 24, 1946. Baker was detonated underwater using a Mark 3 device similar to “Fat Man” with a yield of 21 kilotons. Visible in the spout are ships subjected to the effects of the underwater detonation. Bottom left: Grable was the 42nd nuclear test conducted by the United States at the Nevada National Security Site on May 25, 1953.
    [Show full text]