DOCSLIB.ORG

Grand Canyon Supergroup, Northern Arizona

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Grand Canyon Supergroup, Northern Arizona Unconformity at the Cardenas-Nankoweap contact (Precambrian), Grand Canyon Supergroup, northern Arizona DONALD P. ELSTON I U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 G. ROBERT SCOTT* ' ABSTRACT sedimentary and volcanic rocks about Group (Noble, 1914) and overlying strata 4,000 m thick overlies crystalline basement of the Chuar Group (Ford and Breed, Red-bed strata of the Nankoweap For- rocks (—1.7 b.y. old; Pasteels and Silver, 1973). Because the Nankoweap had not mation unconformably overlie the 1965). These strata, in turn, are overlain by been subdivided into named formations, —l,100-m.y.-old Cardenas Lavas of the sandstone of Early and Middle Cambrian Maxson (1961) reduced the Nankoweap to Unkar Group in the eastern Grand Canyon. age. Near the middle of the series, a 300- formational rank and renamed it the Nan- An unconformity and an apparent discon- m-thick section of basaltic lava flows is un- koweap Formation, a usage herein adopted formity are present. At most places the conformably overlain by about 100 m of (Art. 9a, 15c, American Commission on upper member of the Nankoweap overlies red-brown and purplish sandstone and Stratigraphic Nomenclature, 1961). The the Cardenas, and locally an angular dis- siltstone. The lavas — named the Cardenas Grand Canyon Series of Walcott (1894) cordance can be recognized that reflects the Lavas or Cardenas Lava Series by Keyes thus consists of three distinct major units; truncation of 60 m of Cardenas. This un- (1938), and adopted as the Cardenas Lavas they are, in ascending order, the Unkar conformity also underlies a newly recog- by Ford and others (1972) — and the over- Group, Nankoweap Formation, and Chuar nized ferruginous sandstone of probable lying red sandstone were included in the Group; this series is here redesignated the local extent that underlies the upper upper part of Walcott's (1894) Precam- Grand Canyon Supergroup, as current member and that herein is called the fer- brian Unkar terrane. Van Gundy (1934) stratigraphic practice dictates (Art. 9e, ruginous member of the Nankoweap. named the red sandstone the Nankoweap American Commission on Stratigraphic Truncation of the Cardenas beneath the Group and reported (1951) unconformities Nomenclature, 1961). Appendix 1 sum- ferruginous and upper members locally at its lower and upper contacts. Maxson marizes the lithologie characteristics and may have been as much as 300 m. Basal (1961) subsequently called this unit the thicknesses of the formations and the conglomeratic sandstone of the upper Nankoweap Formation, but he showed no stratigraphic nomenclature for the Grand member locally overlies the ferruginous unconformity at its base in the explanation Canyon Supergroup. member with apparent disconformity, for his geologic map (1967), and he in- reflecting a probable hiatus in deposition. cluded the Nankoweap as the uppermost GEOLOGIC SETTING Stratigraphic and structural relationships formation in the Unkar Group. indicate that a ferruginous weathered zone Information that sheds light on this The Grand Canyon Supergroup is well was developed on an erosionally truncated stratigraphic problem has been obtained exposed in the eastern Grand Canyon (Fig. section of the Cardenas before, and perhaps during paleomagnetic investigations that 1). The beds dip commonly about 8° or less during, the time of deposition of the fer- are being carried out on stratified Precam- and are cut by a few normal faults (see, for ruginous member. Erosion of the ferrugi- brian rocks of the Grand Canyon. Results example, Maxson, 1967). The strata dip nous weathered zone provided material for of the initial investigation near Tanner generally to the east and overlie crystalline the ferruginous member of the Nankoweap. Canyon have already been summarized basement. The ferruginous weathered zone locally was (Elston and Scott, 1973). Key exposures in two areas record criti- faulted against unweathered Cardenas be- cal details of the contact relations between fore deposition of the upper member of the Stratigraphic Nomenclature the Cardenas Lavas and Nankoweap For- Nankoweap. mation. One area is in the graben im- The Nankoweap Formation is discon- New field observations indicate that a mediately north of the Tanner Canyon formably overlain by marine strata of the significant interval of time elapsed between rapids, and the other area is on the south Chuar Group. Three distinct units sepa- deposition of the Cardenas Lavas and side of the Colorado River in the unnamed rated by unconformities (the Unkar Group, deposition of the lower and upper members canyon 0.5 km west of Tanner Canyon Nankoweap Formation, and Chuar Group) of the overlying Nankoweap Formation. (Fig. 2). thus are recognized in the Grand Canyon The earlier part of this interval locally was Series of Walcott. Following current marked by the erosional truncation of a CARDENAS LAVAS stratigraphic practice, the Grand Canyon complete section of the Cardenas and the Series is herein redesignated the Grand chemical weathering of the exposed lava Canyon Supergroup. flows. The later part of this interval was The Cardenas Lavas are about 290 m marked by faulting of the weathered zone thick in the Basalt Canyon—Tanner Canyon INTRODUCTION against unweathered flows, followed by area (Figs. 1, 2; Appendix 1). The forma- erosion and then deposition of the upper tion consists of a lower rubbly weathering, In the eastern Grand Canyon (Fig. 1), a member of the Nankoweap. The evidence slope-forming unit that is about 90 m thick section of little-disturbed Precambrian supports Van Gundy's (1951) conclusion and of an overlying cliff-forming unit ~200 * Present address: Division of Geosciences, Uni- that his Nankoweap Group is a unit sepa- m thick, which includes seven or more versity of Dallas, Dallas, Texas 75320. rate from underlying strata of the Unkar flows separated by layers of silicified Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 87, p. 1763-1772, 4 figs., December 1976, Doc. no. 61210. 1763 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/87/12/1763/3418460/i0016-7606-87-12-1763.pdf by guest on 25 September 2021 EXPLANATION Cambrian rocks Gbt, Bright Angel Shale and underlying Tapeats Sandstone Gbt Gt Gt, Tapeats Sandstone Unconformi ty Precambrian rocks Grand Canyon Supergroup S Chuar Group, undivided Unconformity Nankoweap Formation pGnu Upper member Di sconformity pGnfj Ferruginous member Unconformity p€wz Ferruginous weathered zone on figure 2 Cardenas Lavas Unkar Group » Cardenas Lavas (C) pGd Dox Sandstone (D) pGs Shinumo Quartzite Unconformi ty pGh Hakatai Shale 2MILES Bass Limestone and underlying pGb Hotauta Conglomerate 2 KILOMETERS Unconformi ty pGv Vishnu Schist Figure 1. Geologic map of Precambrian strata, eastern Grand Canyon, Arizona. Geology generalized and modified from Maxson (1967). Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/87/12/1763/3418460/i0016-7606-87-12-1763.pdf by guest on 25 September 2021 UNCONFORMITY AT THE CARDENAS-NANKOWEAP CONTACT 1765 sandstone that range from <1 to ~6 m in structures. The Cardenas thus gives every either at high temperatures during thickness. The lowest flow of the Cardenas indication of having been emplaced sub- emplacement and cooling of the individual is highly vesiculated and discontinuous, aerially. flows or at low temperature after emplace- and it intertongues with the Dox Sandstone Mineralogically and chemically, the ment of the flows. This disseminated hema- (Figs. 2, 3B). Most of the flows display flows are basalt and basaltic andesite (Ap- tite is older than the hematite of the fer- characteristics attributable to subaerial ex- pendix 2; Hendricks and Lucchitta, 1974, ruginous weathered zone. trusion. Vesiculated and rubbly tops for in- Table 1). The dark-gray flow rock com- A whole-rock Rb-Sr isochron has re- dividual flows are common, particularly in monly has a decided reddish cast on fresh vealed an age of 1,090 ± 70 m.y. for the the cliff-forming upper unit. A few small surfaces, caused by disseminated hematite Cardenas Lavas (McKee and Noble, 1974). (~0.3 m) spheroidal structures occur in ex- (see description of intermediate-level flow, K-Ar ages that have been reported for the posures in Basalt Canyon. They are inter- Appendix 2). Apparently hematite was a lavas commonly are 200 m.y. or more preted as weathering features, not pillow ubiquitous oxidation product, forming younger, and presumably reflect loss of EXPLANATION Figure 2. Reconnaissance geologic map of Precambrian and basal Cambrian strata in Tanner Canyon-Basalt Canyon area, eastern Grand E Canyon, Arizona. Geology modified from Maxson (1967). Alluvium Talus and landslide deposits O P. Unconformity n 3 -et i Tapeats Sandstone Unconformity ¡H Chuar Group Unconformity p€nu [ p€nf Nankoweap Formation p6nu, upper member Disconformi ty p£nf, ferruginous member Unconformity pCwz Ferruginous weathered zone developed on Cardenas Lavas tí < Cardenas Lavas p€cu, upper part; cliff- and ledge- forming basaltic flows pGcl, lower part; rubbly-weathering basaltic flows. West of Tanner Canyon includes thin ledge-forming flow at base, beneath thin red sandstone (dotted) that is laterally traceable into the Dox Sandstone pGc, Cardenas Lavas, undivided p-€d Dox Sandstone Contact. Dashed where approximately located. Dotted where concealed. High-angle fault. Dashed where approximately located. TT" Dotted where concealed. Bar and ball on downthrown side. 1,2 indicate sequence of faulting. Syncline, showing plunge. "Upper axis of monocline. Strike and dip of beds. Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/87/12/1763/3418460/i0016-7606-87-12-1763.pdf by guest on 25 September 2021 1766 ELSTON AND SCOTT argon caused by deep burial with attendant weathering was developed across the sec- erosion in a locally less resistant part in the rise in temperature. tion, apparently before deposition of the lower unit of the Cardenas apparently pro- upper member of the Nankoweap Forma- vided a site for the deposition and sub- Unconformities tion. The ferruginous weathered zone west sequent preservation of the ferruginous of Tanner Canyon has a rather uniform sandstone beds of the Nankoweap.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sell-1536, Field Trip Notes, , MILS
    CONTACT INFORMATION Mining Records Curator Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress St., Suite 100 Tucson, Arizona 85701 520-770-3500 http://www.azgs.az.gov [email protected] The following file is part of the James Doyle Sell Mining Collection ACCESS STATEMENT These digitized collections are accessible for purposes of education and research. We have indicated what we know about copyright and rights of privacy, publicity, or trademark. Due to the nature of archival collections, we are not always able to identify this information. We are eager to hear from any rights owners, so that we may obtain accurate information. Upon request, we will remove material from public view while we address a rights issue. CONSTRAINTS STATEMENT The Arizona Geological Survey does not claim to control all rights for all materials in its collection. These rights include, but are not limited to: copyright, privacy rights, and cultural protection rights. The User hereby assumes all responsibility for obtaining any rights to use the material in excess of “fair use.” The Survey makes no intellectual property claims to the products created by individual authors in the manuscript collections, except when the author deeded those rights to the Survey or when those authors were employed by the State of Arizona and created intellectual products as a function of their official duties. The Survey does maintain property rights to the physical and digital representations of the works. QUALITY STATEMENT The Arizona Geological Survey is not responsible for the accuracy of the records, information, or opinions that may be contained in the files. The Survey collects, catalogs, and archives data on mineral properties regardless of its views of the veracity or accuracy of those data.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Kenney Paleozoic Stratigraphy of the Grand Canyon
    Michael Kenney Paleozoic Stratigraphy of the Grand Canyon The Paleozoic Era spans about 250 Myrs of Earth History from 541 Ma to 254 Ma (Figure 1). Within Grand Canyon National Park, there is a fragmented record of this time, which has undergone little to no deformation. These still relatively flat-lying, stratified layers, have been the focus of over 100 years of geologic studies. Much of what we know today began with the work of famed naturalist and geologist, Edwin Mckee (Beus and Middleton, 2003). His work, in addition to those before and after, have led to a greater understanding of sedimentation processes, fossil preservation, the evolution of life, and the drastic changes to Earth’s climate during the Paleozoic. This paper seeks to summarize, generally, the Paleozoic strata, the environments in which they were deposited, and the sources from which the sediments were derived. Tapeats Sandstone (~525 Ma – 515 Ma) The Tapeats Sandstone is a buff colored, quartz-rich sandstone and conglomerate, deposited unconformably on the Grand Canyon Supergroup and Vishnu metamorphic basement (Middleton and Elliott, 2003). Thickness varies from ~100 m to ~350 m depending on the paleotopography of the basement rocks upon which the sandstone was deposited. The base of the unit contains the highest abundance of conglomerates. Cobbles and pebbles sourced from the underlying basement rocks are common in the basal unit. Grain size and bed thickness thins upwards (Middleton and Elliott, 2003). Common sedimentary structures include planar and trough cross-bedding, which both decrease in thickness up-sequence. Fossils are rare but within the upper part of the sequence, body fossils date to the early Cambrian (Middleton and Elliott, 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Canyon
    U.S. Department of the Interior Geologic Investigations Series I–2688 14 Version 1.0 4 U.S. Geological Survey 167.5 1 BIG SPRINGS CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS LIST OF MAP UNITS 4 Pt Ph Pamphlet accompanies map .5 Ph SURFICIAL DEPOSITS Pk SURFICIAL DEPOSITS SUPAI MONOCLINE Pk Qr Holocene Qr Colorado River gravel deposits (Holocene) Qsb FAULT CRAZY JUG Pt Qtg Qa Qt Ql Pk Pt Ph MONOCLINE MONOCLINE 18 QUATERNARY Geologic Map of the Pleistocene Qtg Terrace gravel deposits (Holocene and Pleistocene) Pc Pk Pe 103.5 14 Qa Alluvial deposits (Holocene and Pleistocene) Pt Pc VOLCANIC ROCKS 45.5 SINYALA Qti Qi TAPEATS FAULT 7 Qhp Qsp Qt Travertine deposits (Holocene and Pleistocene) Grand Canyon ၧ DE MOTTE FAULT Pc Qtp M u Pt Pleistocene QUATERNARY Pc Qp Pe Qtb Qhb Qsb Ql Landslide deposits (Holocene and Pleistocene) Qsb 1 Qhp Ph 7 BIG SPRINGS FAULT ′ × ′ 2 VOLCANIC DEPOSITS Dtb Pk PALEOZOIC SEDIMENTARY ROCKS 30 60 Quadrangle, Mr Pc 61 Quaternary basalts (Pleistocene) Unconformity Qsp 49 Pk 6 MUAV FAULT Qhb Pt Lower Tuckup Canyon Basalt (Pleistocene) ၣm TRIASSIC 12 Triassic Qsb Ph Pk Mr Qti Intrusive dikes Coconino and Mohave Counties, Pe 4.5 7 Unconformity 2 3 Pc Qtp Pyroclastic deposits Mr 0.5 1.5 Mၧu EAST KAIBAB MONOCLINE Pk 24.5 Ph 1 222 Qtb Basalt flow Northwestern Arizona FISHTAIL FAULT 1.5 Pt Unconformity Dtb Pc Basalt of Hancock Knolls (Pleistocene) Pe Pe Mၧu Mr Pc Pk Pk Pk NOBLE Pt Qhp Qhb 1 Mၧu Pyroclastic deposits Qhp 5 Pe Pt FAULT Pc Ms 12 Pc 12 10.5 Lower Qhb Basalt flows 1 9 1 0.5 PERMIAN By George H.
    [Show full text]
  • USGS General Information Product
    Geologic Field Photograph Map of the Grand Canyon Region, 1967–2010 General Information Product 189 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey James F. Reilly II, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2019 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Billingsley, G.H., Goodwin, G., Nagorsen, S.E., Erdman, M.E., and Sherba, J.T., 2019, Geologic field photograph map of the Grand Canyon region, 1967–2010: U.S. Geological Survey General Information Product 189, 11 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/gip189. ISSN 2332-354X (online) Cover. Image EF69 of the photograph collection showing the view from the Tonto Trail (foreground) toward Indian Gardens (greenery), Bright Angel Fault, and Bright Angel Trail, which leads up to the south rim at Grand Canyon Village. Fault offset is down to the east (left) about 200 feet at the rim.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeology of the Tapeats Amphitheater and Deer
    HYDROGEOLOGY OF THE TAPEATS AMPHITHEATER AND DEER BASIN, GRAND CANYON, ARIZONA : A STUDY IN KARST HYDROLOGY by Peter Wesley Huntoon A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the COMMITTEE ON HYDROLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1968 AC NOWLEDGEMENT The writer gratefully acknowledges Drs . John W . Harshbarger, Jerome J . Wright, Daniel D . Evans and Evans B . Mayo for their careful reading of the manuscript and their many helpful suggestions . t is with deepfelt appreciation that the writer acknowledges his wife, Susan, for the hours she spent in typing this thesis . An assistantship from the Museum of Northern Arizona and a fellowship from the National Defense Education Act, Title V, provided-the funds necessary to carry out this work . TABLE OF CONTENTS Pa aP L ST OF TABLES vii L ST OF LLUSTRAT ONS viii ABSTRACT x NTRODUCT ON 1 Location 1 Topography and Drainage 1 Climate and Vegetation 2 Topographic Maps 4 Accessibility 5 Objectives of the Thesis ' . , 6 Method of Study . 7 Previous Work , , , , , , , , , , , , 7 ROC UN TS : L THOLOG C AND WATER BEAR NG PROPERT ES , , 10 Definition of Permeability 11 Precambrian Rocks 12 Paleozoic Rocks 13 Tonto Group 15 Tapeats Sandstone 15 Bright Angel Shale , 16 Muav Limestone 17 Temple Butte Limestone 19 Redwall Limestone , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 20 Aubrey Group - ' - 22 Supai Formation 23 Hermit Shale 25 Coconino Sandstone , 25 Toroweap Formation 26 aibab Formation 27 Cenozoic
    [Show full text]
  • Walking Guide
    Grand Canyon National Park Trail of Time National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Walking Guide Find these markers and find these views along the 2 km (1.2 mile) timeline trail. Each one represents a key time in this region’s geologic history. Yavapai Observation Station and the Park geology brochure have additional information about all the Grand Canyon rock layers. Canyon Carving last 6 million years Colorado River Find the Colorado River deep in the canyon. This mighty river has carved the Grand Canyon in “only” the last six million years. Upper Flat Layers 270–315 million years old Kaibab (KIE-bab) Formation Toroweap (TORO-weep) Formation Coconino (coco-KNEE-no) Sandstone Hermit Formation Supai (SOO-pie) Group You are standing on the top rock layer, called the Kaibab Formation. It was deposited 270 million years ago in a shallow sea. From this point you can see lower (older) layers too. The Trail of Time is a joint project of Grand Canyon National Park, the University of New Mexico, and the National Science Foundation Grand Canyon National Park Trail of Time National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Walking Guide Lowest Flat Layer younger layers above 525 million years old older layers below Tapeats (ta-PEETS) Sandstone Your best view of the Tapeats Sandstone is from marker 590. But it is actually 525 million years old. It is the oldest of the horizontal rock layers, but not the oldest rock in the canyon. Supergroup 742–1,255 million years old Hakatai (HACK-a-tie) Shale Find the bright orange Hakatai Shale.
    [Show full text]
  • Bright Angel and Eminence Faults, Eastern Grand Canyon, Arizona
    Bright Angel and Eminence Faults, Eastern Grand Canyon, Arizona PETER W. HUNTOON | JAMES W SEARS ( Department of Geology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82071 ABSTRACT PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS The Bright Angel and Eminence faults trend northeastward for Precambrian faults in the vicinity of Bright Angel Canyon are approximately 60 mi (100 km) through the eastern Grand Canyon shown on Figure 3. Ransome (1908)was the first to identify recur- region. The Bright Angel fault parallels basement foliation. Activity rent structural deformation along the Bright Angel fault. He ob- along the fault dates from Precambrian time. The first record of served that the southeastern block was uplifted during late Pre- movement indicates that it was reverse; it coincided with the depo- cambrian time, displacing basement schist against younger Pre- sition of the basal Shinumo Quartzite. Additional reverse move- cambrian sedimentary rocks along a reverse fault, whereas the ment occurred following intrusion of the Unkar Group by diabase southeastern block was downthrown in the usual sense in post- sills and dikes resulting in a total of as much as 1,300 ft (400 m) of Paleozoic time. Noble and Hunter (1916) noted that the fault coin- displacement, east side up. The Precambrian Chuar Group was cides with a contact between distinctive basement rock types; Max- later broken by a series of northwest-trending normal faults that son and Campbell (1933) observed that the fault was parallel to tilted the section toward the northeast, causing minor adjustments basement foliation. The evidence for Precambrian and post- along the Bright Angel fault. Paleozoic movement was reviewed by Van Gundy (1946).
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Canyon Provenance for Orthoquartzite Clasts in the Lower Miocene of Coastal Southern California GEOSPHERE
    Research Paper GEOSPHERE Grand Canyon provenance for orthoquartzite clasts in the lower Miocene of coastal southern California 1 1 2 3 4 1 GEOSPHERE, v. 15, no. X Leah Sabbeth , Brian P. Wernicke , Timothy D. Raub , Jeffery A. Grover , E. Bruce Lander , and Joseph L. Kirschvink 1Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Boulevard, MC 100-23, Pasadena, California 91125, USA 2School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Scotland, UK KY16 9AJ https://doi.org/10.1130/GES02111.1 3Department of Physical Sciences, Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, California 93403-8106, USA 4Paleo Environmental Associates, Inc., Altadena, California 91101-3205, USA 14 figures; 6 tables; 2 sets of supplemental files CORRESPONDENCE: [email protected] ABSTRACT sandstones. Collectively, these data define a mid-Tertiary, SW-flowing “Arizona River” drainage system between the rapidly eroding eastern Grand Canyon CITATION: Sabbeth, L., Wernicke, B.P., Raub, T.D., Grover, J.A., Lander, E.B., and Kirschvink, J.L., Orthoquartzite detrital source regions in the Cordilleran interior yield region and coastal California. 2019, Grand Canyon provenance for orthoquartzite clast populations with distinct spectra of paleomagnetic inclinations and clasts in the lower Miocene of coastal southern Cal- detrital zircon ages that can be used to trace the provenance of gravels ifornia: Geosphere, v. 15, no. X, p. 1–26, https://doi. org/10.1130/GES02111.1. deposited along the western margin of the Cordilleran orogen. An inventory ■ INTRODUCTION of characteristic remnant magnetizations (CRMs) from >700 sample cores Science Editor: Andrea Hampel from orthoquartzite source regions defines a low-inclination population of Among the most difficult problems in geology is constraining the kilome- Associate Editor: James A.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Late Mesoproterozoic Earth System From
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-2018 Understanding the Late Mesoproterozoic Earth System from the Oldest Strata in Grand Canyon: C-Isotope Stratigraphy and Facies Analysis of the 1254 Ma Bass Formation, Grand Canyon Supergroup, AZ., USA Erin C. Lathrop Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Lathrop, Erin C., "Understanding the Late Mesoproterozoic Earth System from the Oldest Strata in Grand Canyon: C-Isotope Stratigraphy and Facies Analysis of the 1254 Ma Bass Formation, Grand Canyon Supergroup, AZ., USA" (2018). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 7046. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/7046 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNDERSTANDING THE LATE MESOPROTEROZOIC EARTH SYSTEM FROM THE OLDEST STRATA IN GRAND CANYON: C-ISOTOPE STRATIGRAPHY AND FACIES ANALYSIS OF THE 1254 MA BASS FORMATION, GRAND CANYON SUPERGROUP, AZ., USA by Erin C. Lathrop A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Geology Approved: ______________________ ____________________ Carol M. Dehler, Ph.D. Joel L. Pederson, Ph.D. Major Professor Committee Member ______________________ ____________________ Jerome M. Timmons, Ph.D. Mark R. McLellan, Ph.D. Committee Member Vice President for Research and Dean of the School of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2018 ii Copyright © Erin C.
    [Show full text]
  • Circular Structures from the Precambrian Bass Formation In
    Circular structures from the Precambrian Bass Formation in Grand Canyon National Park— biogenic or non-biogenic? Chun Heng Chiu,1 Ian Igleheart,1 and Donald Lofgren2 1The Webb Schools, Claremont, CA 91711 2Raymond M. Alf Museum of Paleontology, Claremont, CA 91711 abstract—Raymond Alf found circular structures on bedding planes of the Bass Formation in Grand Canyon National Park in the 1950s that he interpreted as jellyfish impressions, which were later identified as sedimentary structures and largely forgotten. More recently, Paleoproterozoic Stirling Biota medusoids similar in morphology to the Bass structures were reported from Australia, which inspired a reanalysis of the Bass Formation impressions that consist of two morphotypes. The smaller morphotype has concentric inner and outer rings, with a hypo-relief central core and pitted concentric annuli on the outer margin of the inner ring. The larger morphotype is similar in most respects but has an asymmetrical outer ring. Bass impressions are not rain imprints because rain discs lack the morphological complexity of the Bass structures nor are they holdfasts of fossil organisms because cross sections indicate sediment laminae were not disrupted. Bass Formation structures are probably the result of gas or gaseous fluid erupting through substrate via a gas dome sand volcano as the morphology of Bass impressions is similar to features of recent and Proterozoic sand volcanos/ gas domes. The inner ring of Bass impressions represents the breached dome and its margin of highly disturbed sediment, and the outer ring represents substrate disruption that diminished laterally. Smaller morphotype impressions that abut represent adjacent sand volcanos, clusters of structures with disrupted inner and outer rings represent closely spaced eruptions, and mound-like structures appear to be unerupted domes.
    [Show full text]
  • (U-Th)/He Thermochronology Reveals Pre-Great Unconformity Paleotopography in the Grand Canyon Region, USA B.A
    https://doi.org/10.1130/G49116.1 Manuscript received 5 April 2021 Revised manuscript received 16 June 2021 Manuscript accepted 3 July 2021 © 2021 The Authors. Gold Open Access: This paper is published under the terms of the CC-BY license. Zircon (U-Th)/He thermochronology reveals pre-Great Unconformity paleotopography in the Grand Canyon region, USA B.A. Peak1, R.M. Flowers1, F.A. Macdonald2 and J.M. Cottle2 1Department of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA 2Earth Science Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA ABSTRACT units, which indicates that Precambrian tecto- The Great Unconformity is an iconic geologic feature that coincides with an enigmatic nism is responsible for most of the observed period of Earth’s history that spans the assembly and breakup of the supercontinent Rodinia displacement. In the LGG, the Great Uncon- and the Snowball Earth glaciations. We use zircon (U-Th)/He thermochronology (ZHe) to formity is defined by Tonto Group Tapeats explore the erosion history below the Great Unconformity at its classic Grand Canyon locality Sandstone overlying basement, whereas in the in Arizona, United States. ZHe dates are as old as 809 ± 25 Ma with data patterns that differ UGG, ca. 1255 Ma, Unkar Group rests on base- across both long (∼100 km) and short (tens of kilometers) spatial wavelengths. The spatially ment. It is unclear whether the Supergroup origi- variable thermal histories implied by these data are best explained by Proterozoic syn- nally extended over the LGG and was largely depositional normal faulting that induced differences in exhumation and burial across the removed by the sub-Tapeats unconformity or if region.
    [Show full text]
  • Cenozoic Stratigraphy and Paleogeography of the Grand Canyon, AZ Amanda D'el
    Pre-Cenozoic Stratigraphy and Paleogeography of the Grand Canyon, AZ Amanda D’Elia Abstract The Grand Canyon is a geologic wonder offering a unique glimpse into the early geologic history of the North American continent. The rock record exposed in the massive canyon walls reveals a complex history spanning more than a Billion years of Earth’s history. The earliest known rocks of the Southwestern United States are found in the Basement of the Grand Canyon and date Back to 1.84 Billion years old (Ga). The rocks of the Canyon can Be grouped into three distinct sets Based on their petrology and age (Figure 1). The oldest rocks are the Vishnu Basement rocks exposed at the Base of the canyon and in the granite gorges. These rocks provide a unique clue as to the early continental formation of North America in the early PrecamBrian. The next set is the Grand Canyon Supergroup, which is not well exposed throughout the canyon, But offers a glimpse into the early Beginnings of Before the CamBrian explosion. The final group is the Paleozoic strata that make up the Bulk of the Canyon walls. Exposure of this strata provides a detailed glimpse into North American environmental changes over nearly 300 million years (Ma) of geologic history. Together these rocks serve not only as an awe inspiring Beauty But a unique opportunity to glimpse into the past. Vishnu Basement Rocks The oldest rocks exposed within the Grand Canyon represent some of the earliest known rocks in the American southwest. John Figure 1. Stratigraphic column showing Wesley Paul referred to them as the “dreaded the three sets of rocks found in the Grand rock” Because they make up the walls of some Canyon, their thickness and approximate of the quickest and most difficult rapids to ages (Mathis and Bowman, 2006).
    [Show full text]