Grand Canyon Orogeny, Sixtymile Canyon, Eastern Grand Canyon, Arizona ______13 4
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Late Precambrian Sixtymile Formation and Orogeny at Top of the Grand Canyon Supergroup^ Northern Arizona Late Precambrian Sixtymile Formation and Orogeny at Top of the Grand Canyon Supergroup, Northern Arizona By DONALD P. ELSTON GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1092 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1979 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY H. William Menard, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Elston, Donald Parker, 1926- Late Precambrian Sixtymile Formation and orogeny at top of the Grand Canyon Supergroup, northern Arizona. (Geological Survey Professional Paper 1092) Bibliography: p. 16-17. 1. Geology, Stratigraphic-Pre-Cambrian. 2. Geology-Arizona. I. Title. II. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Professional Paper 1092. QE653.E47 551.7'15 78-21287 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-03139-6 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract ____________________________ 1 Stratigraphy —Continued Introduction _______ ____________________________ 1 Sixtymile Formation ________________— — ___ 10 Acknowledgments .___________________________ 1 Lower member _________________— —— __ 10 Geologic setting _ ____________________________ 1 Middle member _______________________ 11 Previous work ________________________ 2 Upper member _____________________ 12 Structure ______________________________ 4 Tapeats Sandstone ______________________——_ 12 Stratigraphy ___________________________ 4 History and age ____________________——___ 14 Pre-Sixtymile strata _____________________ 6 Correlation ______________________________ 16 Kwagunt Formation _________________ 6 References cited ___________________________ 16 Development of contact relations __________ 6 ILLUSTRATIONS Page FIGURE Geologic map of Sixtymile Formation in Chuar syncline __________________———__ ———— ___ — --————— 1 Type section of Sixtymile Formation and units described at end of report ________ ————— ___ —— ————— ——— 5 Photograph showing Sixtymile Formation and Chuar syncline in north fork of Sixtymile Canyon ___ ————————— __ 7 Stratigraphic relations in Chuar syncline, north fork of Sixtymile Canyon ____________—————————- — - 8 Details of stratigraphic relations in central part of Chuar syncline ________________ — _____——————— 9 TABLES Page TABLE 1. Late Precambrian and Cambrian strata exposed in eastern and central Grand Canyon, Arizona ———__———————— 3 2. Walcott's stratigraphic section of upper division of his Chuar terrane measured on Nankoweap Butte with stratigraphic nomenclature of Ford and Breed _________________________________________________ 3 3. Outline of depositional and structural events of the Grand Canyon orogeny, Sixtymile Canyon, eastern Grand Canyon, Arizona ____________________________________________________________ 13 4. Description of strata at type section of Sixtymile Formation _______________________ — _ ————— — ___— 18 ill LATE PRECAMBRIAN SIXTYMILE FORMATION AND OROGENY AT TOP OF THE GRAND CANYON SUPERGROUP, NORTHERN ARIZONA By DONALD P. ELSTON ABSTRACT was found on the west side of the Chuar syncline, on The Sixtymile Formation, a 60-m-thick red-bed unit at the top of a point and small flat that is developed on the upper the late Precambrian Chuar Group, crops out at three places in the bed of a pair of ledge-forming carbonate beds in the Chuar syncline in the eastern Grand Canyon. Its base is marked by Walcott Member of the Kwagunt Formation. This site a transition from gray marine shale to red sandstone. The Sixtymile was deposited in the deepening trough of the north-trending Chuar allows ready access to the type section of the Sixty- syncline during and as a consequence of regional uplift, tilting, and mile Formation exposed in the trough of the syncline. large-scale block faulting. Folding to form the Chuar syncline oc Reference hand samples and drill-core samples col curred in response to faulting on the parallel-trending Butte fault, lected on close stratigraphic spacings are avail-able about 1 km to the east. About 3.2 km of structural relief was de for inspection. They currently are stored in the U.S. veloped across the Butte fault, principally during deposition of the lower member of the Sixtymile Formation. Landslide debris shed Geological Survey's Paleomagnetics Laboratory in from the upthrown block on the east constitutes a major part of the Flagstaff, Ariz. material in the lower member. Conglomeratic strata of the upper member of the Sixtymile were deposited after the last increment of ACKNOWLEDGMENTS subsidence on the Chuar syncline, indicating that deposition of the Permission given by the National Park Service to Sixtymile Formation spanned the time of the structural distur work and sample in the Grand Canyon National Park bance. The folding and faulting are part of a regional structural is gratefully acknowledged, as is the kind cooperation episode that here is called the Grand Canyon orogeny, an event that signaled the end of deposition of strata of the Grand Canyon Super of David C. Ochsner and Robert Yearout of the Park group and the beginning of a long interval of erosion. Service. The successful and safe completion of the The age of the Grand Canyon orogeny is estimated at about 830 fieldwork was due in a large measure to the efforts of m.y., inferred from an evaluation of maximum and minimum reset Alien L. Wilson, who ably assisted in the collection of K-Ar ages reported for the l,100-m.y.-old Cardenas Lavas of the samples for paleomagnetic analysis on one-third- Unkar Group. In age and structural style, the Grand Canyon orogeny appears generally correlative with the East Kootenay meter stratigraphic intervals across a section of the orogeny of British Columbia, which separates the Purcell (Belt) and Sixtymile Formation that required some effort to Windermere Supergroups. By analogy, strata of the Chuar Group traverse. Samples for the stratigraphically controlled below the Sixtymile Formation are correlated with strata of the K-Ar ages of the Cardenas Lavas determined by E. H. upper part of the Belt Supergroup, and conglomeratic strata of the McKee were collected during joint field studies with Sixtymile deposited after the structural episode are correlated with conglomeratic strata of the Windermere that unconformably overlie McKee. the Belt. GEOLOGIC SETTING INTRODUCTION The Chuar Group (Chuar Group of Walcott, 1883; The upper two formations of the Chuar Group of the Ford and Breed, 1972a, 1973) is the upper of three di Grand Canyon Supergroup contain evidence of struc visions of the Grand Canyon Supergroup (Elston and tural events that resulted in the end of deposition of Scott, 1976; table 1). The Chuar Group is subdivided the late Precambrian strata of the Grand Canyon. De by Ford and Breed (1972a, 1973) into three forma tails of folding, faulting, and landsliding reported here tions, the Galeros and Kwagunt Formations, which are part of a regional episode of block faulting and total 1.9 km in thickness, and the overlying Sixty tilting of strata, an episode called the Grand Canyon Mile Formation, 1 which is 60 m thick. The Galeros revolution by Maxson (1961) and here called the and Kwagunt Formations are dark-gray marine shale Grand Canyon orogeny. The faulting gave rise to with subordinate locally stromatolite-bearing carbon fault-block mountains with relief measured in ate rocks and a few red beds. This study is concerned kilometers. This report is concerned with the geologic with gray shale and dolomite in the Walcott Member history deduced from exposures preserved in Six of the Kwagunt Formation and with overlying red tymile Canyon near the Colorado River (fig. 1). sandstone and landslide breccia of the Sixtymile For- Fieldwork leading to this report was carried out Oc tober 14-17, 1973. The north fork of Sixtymile Can 1 Ford and Breed's (1972a. p. 5, 8) name Sixty Mile Formation is here revised to Six tymile Formation to agree with the spelling of the canyon as it appears on the topographic yon was reached by helicopter; a suitable landing site map of the Vishnu Temple quadrangle. PRECAMBRIAN SIXTYMILE FORMATION AND OROGENY, ARIZONA mis EXPLANATION Paleozoic strata, undivided CAMBRIAN Tapeats Sandstone—As mapped, locally includes Bright Angel Shale PRECAMBRIAN GRAND CANYON SUPERGROUP CHUAR GROUP Sixtymile Formation Walcott Member of Kwagunt Formation (fine dotted line traces pair of marker carbonate beds) Lower strata of Chuar Group, undivided Nankoweap Formation and Cardenas Lavas-Exposed at north end of Butte fault Lower part of Dox Sandstone—Exposed in upthrown fault block on Colorado River ————— Contacl ——j-I— Fault, high angle-Bar and ball on down- thrown side; circle indicates Precambrian displacement; dot indicates post- Paleozoic displacement — --••- Axial trace of Chuar syncline—Long- + dashed where approximately located; short-dashed where indefinite; dotted where concealed y' / Strike and dip of beds -C^j: Mesa FIGURE 1.—Geologic map of Precambrian Sixtymile Formation in Chuar syncline, eastern Grand Canyon, Ariz. Modified from Ford and Breed (1973, fig. 1). LS, landing site; TS, type section. mation (table 1). The Sixtymile was examined at its division of his Chuar terrane, which he had earlier type locality at the head of the north fork of Sixtymile called the Chuar Group, attributing the name to J. W. Canyon (fig. 1), where the most complete section Powell (Walcott, 1883, p. 440). The thickness Walcott exists and