The Shinumo Quadrangle, Grand Canyon District, Arizona

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Shinumo Quadrangle, Grand Canyon District, Arizona DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY , ' ' ' *< ! !-" GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOB BULLETIN 549 THE SHINUMO QUADRANGLE GRAND CANYON DISTRICT ARIZONA BY L. F. NOBLE WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1914 CONTENTS. Preface, by F. L. Kansome................................................. Introduction.............................................................. Location and geography................................................ Field work............................................................ Literature............................................................ Acknowledgments.........................................."............ Physiography of the Grand Canyon district................................. 15 Topography of the Shinumo quadrangle...................................... 2l Climate. .........=...................................................... 25 Vegetation............................................................... 27 Indian ruins.............................................................. 28 Geology.................................................................. 29 Age and character of the rocks.......................................... 29 . Series of rocks discriminated........................................... 31 Proterozoic rocks..................................................... I 32 Archean system.................................................... 32 Vishnu schist.................................................. 32 Name.................................................... 32 Distribution in the Grand Canyon........................... 32 Occurrence and distribution in the Shinumo quadrangle..... 32 Types of the schist......................................... 33 Lithology of the types..................................... 33 Origin of the schist............................:............ 34 Age and correlation....................................... 35 Intrusive quartz diorite and dikes of pegmatite associated with the Vishnu schist............................................ 35 Quartz diorite............................................. 35 Pegmatite................................................ 36 Algonkian system.................................................. 37 Grand Canyon series........................................... 37 Name.................................................... 37 Distribution in the Grand Canyon........................... 37 Structure and distribution in Shinumo quadrangle.......... 39 Unkargroup............................................... 40 Character and subdivisions............................. 40 Hotauta conglomerate................................... 42 Bass limestone........................................ 43 Hakatai shale.......................................... 48 Shinumo quartzite.................................... 51 Dox sandstone......................................... 53 Comparison with type section in Unkar Valley........... 53 Age and correlation of the Grand Canyon series......... 54 4 CONTENTS. Geology Continued. ' page. Proterozoic rocks Continued. ' Algonkian system Continued. Grand Canyon series Continued. Intrusive diabase associated with the Unkar group.......... 55 Occurrence............................................ 55 Petrography.......................................... 56 Variations in character................................ 56 Contact metamorphism................................. 57 Asbestos.............................................. 58 Age of diabase........................................ 60 Paleozoic rocks........................................................ 60 Results of previous work in the region............................... 60 General succession of the Paleozoic rocks........................... 61 Cambrian system................................................... 61 Tonto group................................................... 61 Tapeats sandstone........................................ 61 Bright Angel shale........................................ 62 Muav limestone....... i.................................... 64 Correlation of Tonto group. ................................. 65 Unconformity.................................................... 65 Carboniferous system.............................................. 66 Redwall limestone............................................. 66 Aubrey group................................................. 68 Supaiformation........................................... 68 Coconino sandstone........................................ 69 Kaibab limestone......................................... 70 Variations in thickness of the Paleozoic strata........................ 71 Effect of the variation in thickness of the Paleozoic strata upon topog­ raphy of the canyon wall......................................... ' 73 Structural geology........................................................ 75 West Kaibab fault..................................................... 75 Faults of the Unkar wedge. .................................... ^....... 77 Displacements of the Paleozoic strata.................. i ............... 78 Geologic history.......................................................... 80 The sedimentary and erosional record................................... 80 The plateau problem................................................... 88 Scenic interest of the Shinumo quadrangle................................. 91 Copper deposits of the Shinumo quadrangle.................................. 93 Index.................................................................... 97 ILLUSTRATIONS. Pago. PLATE I. Geologic map of Shinumo quadrangle, Ariz., with structure sec­ tions. .................................................... In pocket. II. A, Traveling on trail in Grand Canyon with pack train; 5, At Bedrock tank, Bass Canyon.................................... 12 III. A and B, Views up Colorado River near Cable Crossing............ 16 IV. A, Panoramic view of Po.well Plateau across Muav Saddle from the Kaibab Plateau; B, Panoramic view of Unkar wedge from Tonto platform................................................... 18 V. Tonto platform: View eastward up Kaibab division of Grand Canyon from level of the Esplanade directly under Havasupai Point..... 20 VI. The Esplanade: View northwestward from Havasupai Point........ 21 VII. A, View northward from Bass Camp; B, View eastward from the summit of Mount Huethawali.................................. 22 VIII. A, East wall of canyon of Shinumo Creek near Shinumo garden; B, View eastward up Colorado River from a point near the mouth of Bass Canyon..................... ; ............................ 28. I.. Generalized columnar section of the rocks of Shinumo quadrangle.., 30 X. A, Bass limestone, in Hotauta Canyon; B, Strata of Unkar group near mouth of Bright Angel Creek.................................. 38 XL View northward across the Grand Canyon from the end of Grand Scenic Divide................................................. 39 XII. Shinumo quartzite: A, North of Cable Crossing; B, In canyon of Shinumo Creek, showing garden................................ 52 XIII. A, View near Cable Crossing, looking down Colorado River; B, Dox sandstone in canyon of Shinumo Creek.......................... 54 XIV. Lower contact of diabase sill: A, On Shinumo Creek; B, At Bedrock tank, Bass Canyon ............................................ 55 XV. A, Muav limestone in Muav Canyon; B, Faults in Unkar wedge in canyon of Shinumo Creek...................................... 64 XVI. A, Pinnacles of erosion (hoodoos) in Kaibab limestone along rim of Kaibab Plateau; B, Wheeler fold in Bass Canyon............... 78 XVII. A, Wheeler fold from bed of Bass Canyon; B, Faulting in strata of the Unkar wedge in Burro Canyon.............................. 79 XVIII. Geologic history of the Shinumo quadrangle as revealed in the canyon wall................................................... 86 FIGURE 1. Index map showing location of Shinumo quadrangle............... 12 6 PREFACE. By F. L. RANSOME. Ever since Powell's daring boat trip down the Colorado in 1869 geologists have known that the walls of the Grand Canyon display one of the most remarkable and instructive geologic sections in the world. At first glance the impressive feature of that section is the great thickness of nearly horizontal strata through which the river has sunk its bed strata ranging in age from Carboniferous (Pennsyl- vanian) at the top, on the brink of the chasm, to Cambrian at the base. Powell found, however, that unconformably below the Cam­ brian in certain portions of the canyon there are extensive remnants of an older and much thicker series of sediments in beds which had been upturned into mountains and truncated by prolonged erosion before the sands of the Cambrian sea covered them. These beds he called the Grand Canyon group and described as resting with pro­ found unconformity on the vastly more ancient crystalline rocks into which the river has also cut deeply in the so-called Granite Gorge. In 1882 appeared Button's well-known "Tertiary history of the Grand Canyon district," which dealt mainly with the erosional development of the canyon and barely touched upon the earlier chapters of the geologic history recorded in its walls. Between 1883 and 1895 Dr. Charles D. Walcott, in a number of papers, described in greater detail the Grand Canyon group of PoweU, dividing it into an upper or Chuar terrane, 5,120 feet thick, and a lower or Unkar terrane, 6,830 feet thick. He assigned
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 2 Paleozoic Stratigraphy of the Grand Canyon
    CHAPTER 2 PALEOZOIC STRATIGRAPHY OF THE GRAND CANYON PAIGE KERCHER INTRODUCTION The Paleozoic Era of the Phanerozoic Eon is defined as the time between 542 and 251 million years before the present (ICS 2010). The Paleozoic Era began with the evolution of most major animal phyla present today, sparked by the novel adaptation of skeletal hard parts. Organisms continued to diversify throughout the Paleozoic into increasingly adaptive and complex life forms, including the first vertebrates, terrestrial plants and animals, forests and seed plants, reptiles, and flying insects. Vast coal swamps covered much of mid- to low-latitude continental environments in the late Paleozoic as the supercontinent Pangaea began to amalgamate. The hardiest taxa survived the multiple global glaciations and mass extinctions that have come to define major time boundaries of this era. Paleozoic North America existed primarily at mid to low latitudes and experienced multiple major orogenies and continental collisions. For much of the Paleozoic, North America’s southwestern margin ran through Nevada and Arizona – California did not yet exist (Appendix B). The flat-lying Paleozoic rocks of the Grand Canyon, though incomplete, form a record of a continental margin repeatedly inundated and vacated by shallow seas (Appendix A). IMPORTANT STRATIGRAPHIC PRINCIPLES AND CONCEPTS • Principle of Original Horizontality – In most cases, depositional processes produce flat-lying sedimentary layers. Notable exceptions include blanketing ash sheets, and cross-stratification developed on sloped surfaces. • Principle of Superposition – In an undisturbed sequence, older strata lie below younger strata; a package of sedimentary layers youngs upward. • Principle of Lateral Continuity – A layer of sediment extends laterally in all directions until it naturally pinches out or abuts the walls of its confining basin.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018-5 PGS Newsletter
    SEPTEMBER 2018 PGS NEWSLETTER VOL LXXI NO 1 September 12, 2018 Tectonics of the Social hour 6:00 PM Midcontinent: Looking Dinner 7:00 PM West (Geologically) Program 8:00 PM Dinner costs from Pittsburgh $30.00 per person $10.00 student member Across the Craton Reservations Email your name and number of attendees in your party to: pgsreservations @gmail.com You can also reserve and pay via PayPal at: https://www.pittsburgh geologicalsociety.org/ Dr. Stephen Marshak Location Foster’s Restaurant University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Foster Plaza Bldg. 10 Green Tree PA Deadline for reservations is noon on Monday, Sept. 10. Speaker Abstract Geologists have long held a fascination with and magnetotelluric arrays) that serve to mountain belts, because of their scenic beauty, characterize variations in crustal thickness, the and because they offer cross sections that intensity of faulting, and the relationship of provide access to rocks once deep in the crust. seismicity to structure; 2) structure-contour Datable igneous and metamorphic rocks in maps that help characterize the nature of mountain belts provide a basis for developing a displacement in fault-and-fold zones; 3) chronology of tectonism. The USA subsidence curves that constrain the timing of Midcontinent region doesn't display such basin subsidence; 4) a digital elevation model drama. These interior plains, which extend (DEM) of the Great Unconformity (the contact from Pittsburgh west to the Rockies, are part of between Precambrian and Paleozoic strata), North America's cratonic platform, a region in that gives a clearer image of structural relief which crust that formed over 1 billion years ago between basins and domes; 5) results from a lies buried beneath a veneer of nearly flat-lying thermochronologic study of the Great Phanerozoic sedimentary strata.
    [Show full text]
  • PCA) Report Name Colorado River Site Code S.USCOHP*15679
    Level 4 Potential Conservation Area (PCA) Report Name Colorado River Site Code S.USCOHP*15679 IDENTIFIERS Site ID 1328 Site Class PCA Site Alias Colorado River Megasite Network of Conservation Areas (NCA) NCA Site ID NCA Site Code NCA Site Name - No Data County Garfield (CO) Grand (UT) Mesa (CO) SITE DESCRIPTION Site Description This site includes the stretch of the Colorado River that extends from Rifle to the Utah border. The Colorado River riparian corridor is the most heavily developed area in Mesa County. The floodplains near the river were historically dominated by stands of Rio Grande cottonwood (Populus deltoides ssp. wislizeni) with an understory of skunkbrush (Rhus trilobata). However, development of the floodplain, agriculture, and most notably, the invasion of non-native species such as tamarisk ( Tamarix ramosissima), Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia), and Russian knapweed (Acroptilon repens) have greatly reduced the amount of native riparian vegetation within this site. Extensive gravel mining operations in the river floodplain up and downstream of the City of Rifle has included the removal of cottonwood gallery forests and commensurate riparian and stream values that these forests provide. Along the immediate banks of the river and around wetlands in the floodplain, coyote willow (Salix exigua), cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium), barnyard grass (Echinochloa crus-galli), reedcanary grass (Phalaris arundinacea), common reed (Phragmites australis), cattail (Typha latifolia), hardstem bulrush (Schoenoplectus acutus), threesquare bulrush (S. pungens), alkali bulrush (S. maritimus), and redroot flatsedge (Cyperus erythrorhizos) are typically dominant. This site provides critically important habitat for endangered fish such as the razorback sucker ( Xyrauchen texanus), Colorado pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus lucius), and humpback chub (Gila cypha).
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Canyon
    ALT ALT To 389 To 389 To Jacob Lake, 89 To 89 K and South Rim a n a b Unpaved roads are impassable when wet. C Road closed r KAIBAB NATIONAL FOREST e in winter e K k L EA O N R O O B K NY O A E U C C N T E N C 67 I A H M N UT E Y SO N K O O A N House Rock Y N N A Buffalo Ranch B A KANAB PLATEAU C C E A L To St. George, Utah N B Y Kaibab Lodge R Mount Trumbull O A N KAIBAB M 8028ft De Motte C 2447m (USFS) O er GR C o Riv AN T PLATEAU K HUNDRED AND FIFTY MIL lorad ITE ap S NAVAJO E Co N eat C A s C Y RR C N O OW ree S k M INDIAN GRAND CANYON NATIONAL PARK B T Steamboat U Great Thumb Point Mountain C RESERVATION K 6749ft 7422ft U GREAT THUMB 2057m 2262m P Chikapanagi Point MESA C North Rim A 5889ft E N G Entrance Station 1795m M Y 1880ft FOSSIL R 8824ft O Mount Sinyala O U 573m G A k TUCKUP N 5434ft BAY Stanton Point e 2690m V re POINT 1656m 6311ft E U C SB T A C k 1924m I E e C N AT A e The Dome POINT A PL N r o L Y Holy Grail l 5486ft R EL Point Imperial C o Tuweep G W O Temple r 1672m PO N Nankoweap a p d H E o wea Mesa A L nko o V a Mooney D m N 6242ft A ID Mount Emma S Falls u 1903m U M n 7698ft i Havasu Falls h 2346m k TOROWEAP er C Navajo Falls GORGE S e v A Vista e i ITE r Kwagunt R VALLEY R N N Supai Falls A Encantada C iv o Y R nt Butte W d u e a O G g lor Supai 2159ft Unpaved roads are North Rim wa 6377ft r o N K h C Reservations required.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Kenney Paleozoic Stratigraphy of the Grand Canyon
    Michael Kenney Paleozoic Stratigraphy of the Grand Canyon The Paleozoic Era spans about 250 Myrs of Earth History from 541 Ma to 254 Ma (Figure 1). Within Grand Canyon National Park, there is a fragmented record of this time, which has undergone little to no deformation. These still relatively flat-lying, stratified layers, have been the focus of over 100 years of geologic studies. Much of what we know today began with the work of famed naturalist and geologist, Edwin Mckee (Beus and Middleton, 2003). His work, in addition to those before and after, have led to a greater understanding of sedimentation processes, fossil preservation, the evolution of life, and the drastic changes to Earth’s climate during the Paleozoic. This paper seeks to summarize, generally, the Paleozoic strata, the environments in which they were deposited, and the sources from which the sediments were derived. Tapeats Sandstone (~525 Ma – 515 Ma) The Tapeats Sandstone is a buff colored, quartz-rich sandstone and conglomerate, deposited unconformably on the Grand Canyon Supergroup and Vishnu metamorphic basement (Middleton and Elliott, 2003). Thickness varies from ~100 m to ~350 m depending on the paleotopography of the basement rocks upon which the sandstone was deposited. The base of the unit contains the highest abundance of conglomerates. Cobbles and pebbles sourced from the underlying basement rocks are common in the basal unit. Grain size and bed thickness thins upwards (Middleton and Elliott, 2003). Common sedimentary structures include planar and trough cross-bedding, which both decrease in thickness up-sequence. Fossils are rare but within the upper part of the sequence, body fossils date to the early Cambrian (Middleton and Elliott, 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • GOALS 4-Day Ruby / Horsethief Itinerary
    GOALS 4-day Ruby / Horsethief Itinerary Day Title Detailed Description TRAVEL DAY. Today, we travel to Highline State Park in Loma, where we’ll spend the late afternoon 1 swimming in their large lake (depending on the time we arrive) to beat the western slope heat. When night begins to fall, we’ll set up camp in the group campsite we have reserved - and will begin the Date: TRAVEL DAY GOALS curriculum by composing our group oath. As excited as we are, we’ll try to get a good night’s sleep tonight, as we ___/___ officially begin our river adventure tomorrow morning! After packing up camp and a thorough safety talk, we’ll meet the rest of our professional guide crew and launch onto the river to begin our downstream adventure. Slowly, the canyon walls will get taller and taller as we head downstream in rafts, inflatable kayaks, and on SUP boards. When our bellies tell us it’s time, we’ll pull over and make a delicious riverside lunch. 2 After lunch, we’ll continue downstream toward our first night’s camp - most likely in the area of the Cottonwood and Mee camps. As we float, we’ll be watching for bald eagles, river otters, and desert Date: GETTING IN THE FLOW bighorn sheep. When we arrive at tonight’s camp, we’ll break into teams, some of whom will help in the kitchen, some on the boats, and some with setting up the camp itself. Late afternoon is a great time for ___/___ camp games or a quick swim in a river eddy to cool down.
    [Show full text]
  • LAYERED PEGMATITE-APLITE Division of Earth Sciences, The
    MINERALOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, SPECIAL PAPER 1, 1963 INTERNATIONALMINERALOGICALASSOCIATION,PAPERS, THIRD GENERAL MEETING LAYERED PEGMATITE-APLITE INTRUSIVES 1 RICHARD H. JAHNS AND O. FRANK TUTTLE Division of Earth Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania ABSTRACT Intrusive bodies of granitic pegmatite and aplite with simple or complex layering include those representing multiple injections of magma from external sources and those representing single injections of magma followed by segregation dur- ing crystallization. Those of the latter category can be subdivided into four classes, intergradations among which are not uncommon: 1. Bodies of aplite or fine-grained pegmatite with very large phenocrysts, or megacrysts. 2. Aplite bodies with mar- ginal or interior pegmatite masses generally formed in situ. 3. Pegmatite bodies with marginal or interior aplite masses formed in situ or by autoinjection. 4. Highly asymmetric bodies whose upper parts consist mainly or wholly of pegmatite and whose lower parts consist mainly or wholly of aplite. Zonal structure defines a gross layering within many pegmatite bodies, and a layer-like distribution of pegmatite and aplite also is common over a wide range of scales. Some of the aplites are faintly to distinctly flow layered, and others are featured by rhythmic layering in which adjacent thin and regular units differ from each other in composition. None of the observed types of layering is regarded as a result of crystal accumulation. The bulk composition of the layered intrusive bodies falls in the thermal valley of petrogeny's residua system at an average composition corresponding to a parent magma saturated with water at high pressures (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for the USA (W7A
    Summits on the Air – ARM for the U.S.A (W7A - Arizona) Summits on the Air U.S.A. (W7A - Arizona) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S53.1 Issue number 5.0 Date of issue 31-October 2020 Participation start date 01-Aug 2010 Authorized Date: 31-October 2020 Association Manager Pete Scola, WA7JTM Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Document S53.1 Page 1 of 15 Summits on the Air – ARM for the U.S.A (W7A - Arizona) TABLE OF CONTENTS CHANGE CONTROL....................................................................................................................................... 3 DISCLAIMER................................................................................................................................................. 4 1 ASSOCIATION REFERENCE DATA ........................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Program Derivation ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 General Information ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Final Ascent
    [Show full text]
  • (FP)-Rich Aplite-Pegmatites in the Central Iberian Zone Geologic
    Ore Geology Reviews 95 (2018) 408–430 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ore Geology Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/oregeorev Petrogenetic relationships between Variscan granitoids and Li-(F-P)-rich T aplite-pegmatites in the Central Iberian Zone: Geological and geochemical constraints and implications for other regions from the European Variscides ⁎ E. Roda-Roblesa, , C. Villasecab, A. Pesqueraa, P.P. Gil-Crespoa, R. Vieirac, A. Limac, I. Garate-Olavea a Dpto. Mineralogía y Petrología, Universidad del País Vasco UPV/EHU, Barrio Sarriena s/n, 48940 Leioa, Spain b Dpto. Petrología y Geoquímica, Universidad Complutense, IGEO (UCM, CSIC), 28040 Madrid, Spain c Instituto de Ciências da Terra, Universidade do Porto/DGAOT, Rua do Campo Alegre 687, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The Central Iberian Zone (CIZ) is characterised by a large volume of Variscan granitic intrusions, which can be Li-rich aplite-pegmatites grouped into five types: (1) two-mica peraluminous leucogranites (S1); (2) P-rich highly peraluminous granites Granite batholiths (S2); (3) P-poor moderately peraluminous granites (S3); (4) moderately to low peraluminous granites (S4); and Geochemistry (5) I-type low peraluminous granites (I). Though not as abundant as granites, aplite-pegmatite rocks are Central Iberian Zone nonetheless widespread in this region, occurring either as fields of aplite-pegmatite dykes or as leucogranitic European Variscan Belt cupolas. They are commonly enriched in Li-(F-P) minerals such as spodumene, petalite, micas, and phosphates of the amblygonite-montebrasite and triphylite-lithiophilite series. Many of the Li-rich bodies show an aplitic texture, frequently with the development of layered units.
    [Show full text]
  • Harvey Butchart's Hiking Log DETAILED HIKING LOGS (January
    Harvey Butchart’s Hiking Log DETAILED HIKING LOGS (January 22, 1965 - September 25, 1965) Mile 24.6 and Hot Na Na Wash [January 22, 1965 to January 23, 1965] My guest for this trip, Norvel Johnson, thought we were going for just the day. When I told him it was a two day trip, he brought in his sleeping bag, but since he had no knapsack, we decided to sleep at the Jeep. The idea was to see Hot Na Na from the rim on Friday and then go down it as far as possible on Saturday. We thought we were following the Tanner Wash Quad map carefully when we left the highway a little to the north of the middle of the bay formed by Curve Wash in the Echo Cliffs. What we didn't realize is that there is another turnoff only a quarter of a mile north of the one we used. This is the way we came out of the hinterland on Saturday. Our exit is marked by a large pile of rocks and it gives a more direct access to all the country we were interested in seeing. The way we went in goes west, south, and north and we got thoroughly confused before we headed toward the rim of Marble Canyon. The track we followed goes considerably past the end of the road which we finally identified as the one that is one and a half miles north of Pine Reservoir. It ended near a dam. We entered the draw beyond the dam and after looking down at the Colorado River, decided that we were on the north side of the bay at Mile 24.6.
    [Show full text]
  • GRAND CANYON GUIDE No. 6
    GRAND CANYON GUIDE no. 6 ... excerpted from Grand Canyon Explorer … Bob Ribokas AN AMATEUR'S REVIEW OF BACKPACKING TOPICS FOR THE T254 - EXPEDITION TO THE GRAND CANYON - MARCH 2007 Descriptions of Grand Canyon Layers Grand Canyon attracts the attention of the world for many reasons, but perhaps its greatest significance lies in the geologic record that is so beautifully preserved and exposed here. The rocks at Grand Canyon are not inherently unique; similar rocks are found throughout the world. What is unique about the geologic record at Grand Canyon is the great variety of rocks present, the clarity with which they're exposed, and the complex geologic story they tell. Paleozoic Strata: Kaibab depositional environment: Kaibab Limestone - This layer forms the surface of the Kaibab and Coconino Plateaus. It is composed primarily of a sandy limestone with a layer of sandstone below it. In some places sandstone and shale also exists as its upper layer. The color ranges from cream to a greyish-white. When viewed from the rim this layer resembles a bathtub ring and is commonly referred to as the Canyon's bathtub ring. Fossils that can be found in this layer are brachiopods, coral, mollusks, sea lilies, worms and fish teeth. Toroweap depositional environment Toroweap Formation - This layer is composed of pretty much the same material as the Kaibab Limestone above. It is darker in color, ranging from yellow to grey, and contains a similar fossil history. Coconino depositional environment: Coconino Sandstone - This layer is composed of pure quartz sand, which are basically petrified sand dunes. Wedge-shaped cross bedding can be seen where traverse-type dunes have been petrified.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Names
    GEOGRAPHIC NAMES CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES ? REVISED TO JANUARY, 1911 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1911 PREPARED FOR USE IN THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE BY THE UNITED STATES GEOGRAPHIC BOARD WASHINGTON, D. C, JANUARY, 1911 ) CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES. The following list of geographic names includes all decisions on spelling rendered by the United States Geographic Board to and including December 7, 1910. Adopted forms are shown by bold-face type, rejected forms by italic, and revisions of previous decisions by an asterisk (*). Aalplaus ; see Alplaus. Acoma; township, McLeod County, Minn. Abagadasset; point, Kennebec River, Saga- (Not Aconia.) dahoc County, Me. (Not Abagadusset. AQores ; see Azores. Abatan; river, southwest part of Bohol, Acquasco; see Aquaseo. discharging into Maribojoc Bay. (Not Acquia; see Aquia. Abalan nor Abalon.) Acworth; railroad station and town, Cobb Aberjona; river, IVIiddlesex County, Mass. County, Ga. (Not Ackworth.) (Not Abbajona.) Adam; island, Chesapeake Bay, Dorchester Abino; point, in Canada, near east end of County, Md. (Not Adam's nor Adams.) Lake Erie. (Not Abineau nor Albino.) Adams; creek, Chatham County, Ga. (Not Aboite; railroad station, Allen County, Adams's.) Ind. (Not Aboit.) Adams; township. Warren County, Ind. AJjoo-shehr ; see Bushire. (Not J. Q. Adams.) Abookeer; AhouJcir; see Abukir. Adam's Creek; see Cunningham. Ahou Hamad; see Abu Hamed. Adams Fall; ledge in New Haven Harbor, Fall.) Abram ; creek in Grant and Mineral Coun- Conn. (Not Adam's ties, W. Va. (Not Abraham.) Adel; see Somali. Abram; see Shimmo. Adelina; town, Calvert County, Md. (Not Abruad ; see Riad. Adalina.) Absaroka; range of mountains in and near Aderhold; ferry over Chattahoochee River, Yellowstone National Park.
    [Show full text]