Great Escarpment): Assessing Migration Routes and Endemism

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Great Escarpment): Assessing Migration Routes and Endemism The Phytogeography of the Sneeuberg, Nuweveldberge and Roggeveldberge (Great Escarpment): Assessing Migration Routes and Endemism A thesis submitted in the fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Rhodes University by Vincent Ralph Clark May 2010 Supervisor: Prof. N.P. Barker (Department of Botany, Rhodes University) Co-supervisor: Prof. L. Mucina (Department of Environmental & Aquatic Sciences, Curtin University of Technology) Dedication “For by Him were all things created that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible…All things were created through Him and for Him. And He is before all things and in Him all thing consist” Colossians 1:16 17 This thesis is dedicated to the Lord Jesus Christ, Who knows unequivocally what actually has gone on on this planet in ages gone by (!) i Abstract The Great Escarpment forms a semi-continuous mountain system 5 000 km long, stretching from Angola in the north-west, south through Namibia, and into western, southern and eastern South Africa, including Lesotho and Swaziland. It is composed of a wide variety of geological suites but is unified in representing the edge of the African plateau and the passive Gondwanan continental margin. The Great Escarpment falls into all major climatic zones on the subcontinent, is a repository of palaeo- and neo-endemics, hosts more than half of southern Africa’s centres of plant endemism, and has a rich suite of endemic fauna. In addition, the Great Escarpment is believed to be both a refugium and corridor for biological diversity. Despite the biological richness of the Great Escarpment, research to date has been fragmented and many sections of the Great Escarpment have not been studied. The aim of this study is to contribute to research on the Great Escarpment by undertaking a detailed floristic study of the southern Great Escarpment (the Sneeuberg, Nuweveldberge and Roggeveldberge). Together these mountains comprise approximately 1 000 km (one fifth) of the Great Escarpment, and occupy a transition zone between the summer rainfall zone in the east and the winter rainfall zone in the west. They are also the sections of Great Escarpment most closely situated to the Cape Floristic Region (CFR) and would thus be involved in hypothesised migration routes for lineages that also occur further north through the Drakensberg Alpine Centre (DAC) to the East African mountain chain. Detailed fieldwork of the southern Great Escarpment was undertaken over a period of four years in all seasons. Approximately 8 000 specimens were collected. Particular emphasis was placed on areas that may represent refugia, i.e. the highest plateaux and peaks, mesic areas and cliff-lines. An overview of each mountain range, together with their endemic plant species and phytogeography, is provided. Approximately ten new species have been discovered during this study, two of which have been ii described to date. Numerous endemics only known from their types have also been rediscovered. The Sneeuberg is defined as a new centre of plant endemism on the Great Escarpment (endemism of 2.3%), and the role of the Boschberg and Groot-Bruintjieshoogde (part of the Sneeuberg) as a nexus for floristic migration routes is discussed. The Nuweveldberge is shown to have low endemism despite a floristic tally similar to the Sneeuberg, while the Roggeveldberge are confirmed to be the most endemic-rich section of the southern Great Escarpment. The field data collected was augmented by available data in taxonomic revisions, and floras for the Sneeuberg, Nuweveldberge and Roggeveldberge were compiled. In order to floristically compare the southern Great Escarpment with other sections of the Great Escarpment and the CFR, a database of some 12 000 taxa was created using available floristic data for the CFR, DAC and Great Winterberg Amatolas, together with the data collated for the Sneeuberg, Nuweveldberge and Roggeveldberge. These data were analysed using phenetic methods and Parsimony Analysis of Endemicity (PAE). The results indicate stronger linkages in the east, particularly between the Sneeuberg and Nuweveldberge, and between the Sneeuberg and the Great Winterberg Amatolas. The relationship of the Roggeveldberge with the rest of the southern Great Escarpment remains ambiguous. In order to refine notions of connectivity and migration routes, 19 well-sampled phylogenies were assessed for sister-taxon disjunctions to explore CFR Great Escarpment connections. Palaeo- connectivity between the CFR and southern Great Escarpment is most strongly supported for the south-eastern (SE) connection, and less so for the north-western (NW) and Matjiesfontein connections. There is support for the current (or recent) use of these three connections from numerous species that occur on both sides of the connections. Results of these analyses indicate that the southern Great Escarpment is a palaeo-corridor, the functioning of which has been broken by the aridification of the Nuweveldberge since the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). Floristic connectivity is strongest in the east, from the Nuweveldberge to the DAC, and is less so in the west between the Nuweveldberge iii and the Roggeveldberge a finding attributed to the transition from a reliable winter rainfall regime on the Roggeveldberge to an unpredictable moisture regime on the Nuweveldberge. The mountains of the southern Great Escarpment are thus a series of refugia from a previous moister, cooler climate and are a corridor between the eastern and western components of the Great Escarpment. The SE connection is the primary link between the CFR and the eastern Great Escarpment Afromontane region in southern Africa. The implications of this research are that accurate conservation assessments and Red Data listings for many of the previously poorly-known endemics can now be made, and appropriate conservation measures implemented. Climate change remains the primary threat to these endemics and montane taxa in general, while degradation of wetlands is the primary threat to the water catchment service provided by the southern Great Escarpment. Future detailed research on the Great Winterberg Amatolas and Stormberg and a comprehensive flora of the Hantamm Roggeveldberge will further enhance our understanding of the floristics of the southern Great Escarpment, and provide the necessary data for comprehensive GIS-based models of proposed climate change scenarios for local, regional and national conservation planning. iv Table of Contents Dedication .......................................................................................................................................... i Abstract ............................................................................................................................................. ii Table of Contents .............................................................................................................................. v List of Figures .................................................................................................................................. ix List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. xiii List of Appendices........................................................................................................................... xv Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................... xvii Declaration ..................................................................................................................................... xxi Preamble ....................................................................................................................................... xxii Chapter 1: The Great Escarpment of Southern Africa. ........................................................................ 1 1.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.2. The geology, geomorphology, origin and physical characteristics of the Great Escarpment...... 6 1.2.1. Origins ............................................................................................................................. 6 1.2.2. Geology ........................................................................................................................... 7 1.2.3. Relief, Hydrology and Intervals ........................................................................................ 7 1.2.4. Climate .......................................................................................................................... 11 1.2.5. Comparisons with other mountain systems in the world .................................................. 12 1.3. The Biodiversity of the Great Escarpment ............................................................................. 16 1.3.1. Angola ........................................................................................................................... 18 1.3.2. Namibia ......................................................................................................................... 19 1.3.3. South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland ............................................................................. 20 1.3.4. Zimbabwe–Mozambique ................................................................................................ 21 1.4. Research
Recommended publications
  • Boophone Disticha
    Micropropagation and pharmacological evaluation of Boophone disticha Lee Cheesman Submitted in fulfilment of the academic requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Research Centre for Plant Growth and Development School of Life Sciences University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg April 2013 COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, ENGINEERING AND SCIENCES DECLARATION 1 – PLAGIARISM I, LEE CHEESMAN Student Number: 203502173 declare that: 1. The research contained in this thesis, except where otherwise indicated, is my original research. 2. This thesis has not been submitted for any degree or examination at any other University. 3. This thesis does not contain other persons’ data, pictures, graphs or other information, unless specifically acknowledged as being sourced from other persons. 4. This thesis does not contain other persons’ writing, unless specifically acknowledged as being sourced from other researchers. Where other written sources have been quoted, then: a. Their words have been re-written but the general information attributed to them has been referenced. b. Where their exact words have been used, then their writing has been placed in italics and inside quotation marks, and referenced. 5. This thesis does not contain text, graphics or tables copied and pasted from the internet, unless specifically acknowledged, and the source being detailed in the thesis and in the reference section. Signed at………………………………....on the.....….. day of ……......……….2013 ______________________________ SIGNATURE i STUDENT DECLARATION Micropropagation and pharmacological evaluation of Boophone disticha I, LEE CHEESMAN Student Number: 203502173 declare that: 1. The research reported in this dissertation, except where otherwise indicated is the result of my own endeavours in the Research Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg.
    [Show full text]
  • Protected Species Relocation Management Plan
    i Protected Species Relocation Management Plan Farm Doorns no 131 Agricultural Development, Ritchie, Northern Cape Province October 2018 Compiled for: Compiled by: Rikus Lamprecht Ecological Specialist (Pr.Sci.Nat) EcoFocus Consulting 072 230 9598 [email protected] ii Table of Content 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Objectives of the Protected Species Relocation Management Plan ............................................ 2 3. Study Area ...................................................................................................................................... 3 3.1. Climate .................................................................................................................................... 5 3.2. Geology and Soils ................................................................................................................... 5 3.3. Vegetation and Conservation Status ..................................................................................... 5 4. Findings of the Ecological Assessment Report .............................................................................. 8 5. Removal, Relocation and Re-establishment Process .................................................................. 11 5.1. Removal ................................................................................................................................ 11 5.2. Relocation ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (Tribe Haemantheae) Inferred from Plastid and Nuclear Non-Coding DNA Sequences
    Plant Syst. Evol. 244: 141–155 (2004) DOI 10.1007/s00606-003-0085-z Generic relationships among the baccate-fruited Amaryllidaceae (tribe Haemantheae) inferred from plastid and nuclear non-coding DNA sequences A. W. Meerow1, 2 and J. R. Clayton1 1 USDA-ARS-SHRS, National Germplasm Repository, Miami, Florida, USA 2 Fairchild Tropical Garden, Miami, Florida, USA Received October 22, 2002; accepted September 3, 2003 Published online: February 12, 2004 Ó Springer-Verlag 2004 Abstract. Using sequences from the plastid trnL-F Key words: Amaryllidaceae, Haemantheae, geo- region and nrDNA ITS, we investigated the phy- phytes, South Africa, monocotyledons, DNA, logeny of the fleshy-fruited African tribe Haeman- phylogenetics, systematics. theae of the Amaryllidaceae across 19 species representing all genera of the tribe. ITS and a Baccate fruits have evolved only once in the combined matrix produce the most resolute and Amaryllidaceae (Meerow et al. 1999), and well-supported tree with parsimony analysis. Two solely in Africa, but the genera possessing main clades are resolved, one comprising the them have not always been recognized as a monophyletic rhizomatous genera Clivia and Cryp- monophyletic group. Haemanthus L. and tostephanus, and a larger clade that unites Haemanthus and Scadoxus as sister genera to an Gethyllis L. were the first two genera of the Apodolirion/Gethyllis subclade. One of four group to be described (Linneaus 1753). Her- included Gethyllis species, G. lanuginosa, resolves bert (1837) placed Haemanthus (including as sister to Apodolirion with ITS. Relationships Scadoxus Raf.) and Clivia Lindl. in the tribe among the Clivia species are not in agreement with Amaryllidiformes, while Gethyllis was classi- a previous published phylogeny.
    [Show full text]
  • GENOME EVOLUTION in MONOCOTS a Dissertation
    GENOME EVOLUTION IN MONOCOTS A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School At the University of Missouri In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy By Kate L. Hertweck Dr. J. Chris Pires, Dissertation Advisor JULY 2011 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled GENOME EVOLUTION IN MONOCOTS Presented by Kate L. Hertweck A candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy And hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Dr. J. Chris Pires Dr. Lori Eggert Dr. Candace Galen Dr. Rose‐Marie Muzika ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted to many people for their assistance during the course of my graduate education. I would not have derived such a keen understanding of the learning process without the tutelage of Dr. Sandi Abell. Members of the Pires lab provided prolific support in improving lab techniques, computational analysis, greenhouse maintenance, and writing support. Team Monocot, including Dr. Mike Kinney, Dr. Roxi Steele, and Erica Wheeler were particularly helpful, but other lab members working on Brassicaceae (Dr. Zhiyong Xiong, Dr. Maqsood Rehman, Pat Edger, Tatiana Arias, Dustin Mayfield) all provided vital support as well. I am also grateful for the support of a high school student, Cady Anderson, and an undergraduate, Tori Docktor, for their assistance in laboratory procedures. Many people, scientist and otherwise, helped with field collections: Dr. Travis Columbus, Hester Bell, Doug and Judy McGoon, Julie Ketner, Katy Klymus, and William Alexander. Many thanks to Barb Sonderman for taking care of my greenhouse collection of many odd plants brought back from the field.
    [Show full text]
  • ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names 7Th Edition
    ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names th 7 Edition ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. M. Schori Published by All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be The Internation Seed Testing Association (ISTA) reproduced, stored in any retrieval system or transmitted Zürichstr. 50, CH-8303 Bassersdorf, Switzerland in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior ©2020 International Seed Testing Association (ISTA) permission in writing from ISTA. ISBN 978-3-906549-77-4 ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names 1st Edition 1966 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Prof P. A. Linehan 2nd Edition 1983 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. H. Pirson 3rd Edition 1988 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. W. A. Brandenburg 4th Edition 2001 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 5th Edition 2007 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 6th Edition 2013 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 7th Edition 2019 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. M. Schori 2 7th Edition ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names Content Preface .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Symbols and Abbreviations ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TELOPEA Publication Date: 13 October 1983 Til
    Volume 2(4): 425–452 TELOPEA Publication Date: 13 October 1983 Til. Ro)'al BOTANIC GARDENS dx.doi.org/10.7751/telopea19834408 Journal of Plant Systematics 6 DOPII(liPi Tmst plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/Telopea • escholarship.usyd.edu.au/journals/index.php/TEL· ISSN 0312-9764 (Print) • ISSN 2200-4025 (Online) Telopea 2(4): 425-452, Fig. 1 (1983) 425 CURRENT ANATOMICAL RESEARCH IN LILIACEAE, AMARYLLIDACEAE AND IRIDACEAE* D.F. CUTLER AND MARY GREGORY (Accepted for publication 20.9.1982) ABSTRACT Cutler, D.F. and Gregory, Mary (Jodrell(Jodrel/ Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, England) 1983. Current anatomical research in Liliaceae, Amaryllidaceae and Iridaceae. Telopea 2(4): 425-452, Fig.1-An annotated bibliography is presented covering literature over the period 1968 to date. Recent research is described and areas of future work are discussed. INTRODUCTION In this article, the literature for the past twelve or so years is recorded on the anatomy of Liliaceae, AmarylIidaceae and Iridaceae and the smaller, related families, Alliaceae, Haemodoraceae, Hypoxidaceae, Ruscaceae, Smilacaceae and Trilliaceae. Subjects covered range from embryology, vegetative and floral anatomy to seed anatomy. A format is used in which references are arranged alphabetically, numbered and annotated, so that the reader can rapidly obtain an idea of the range and contents of papers on subjects of particular interest to him. The main research trends have been identified, classified, and check lists compiled for the major headings. Current systematic anatomy on the 'Anatomy of the Monocotyledons' series is reported. Comment is made on areas of research which might prove to be of future significance.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Survey of Mount Gorongosa
    VEGETATION SURVEY OF MOUNT GORONGOSA Tom Müller, Anthony Mapaura, Bart Wursten, Christopher Chapano, Petra Ballings & Robin Wild 2008 (published 2012) Occasional Publications in Biodiversity No. 23 VEGETATION SURVEY OF MOUNT GORONGOSA Tom Müller, Anthony Mapaura, Bart Wursten, Christopher Chapano, Petra Ballings & Robin Wild 2008 (published 2012) Occasional Publications in Biodiversity No. 23 Biodiversity Foundation for Africa P.O. Box FM730, Famona, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe Vegetation Survey of Mt Gorongosa, page 2 SUMMARY Mount Gorongosa is a large inselberg almost 700 sq. km in extent in central Mozambique. With a vertical relief of between 900 and 1400 m above the surrounding plain, the highest point is at 1863 m. The mountain consists of a Lower Zone (mainly below 1100 m altitude) containing settlements and over which the natural vegetation cover has been strongly modified by people, and an Upper Zone in which much of the natural vegetation is still well preserved. Both zones are very important to the hydrology of surrounding areas. Immediately adjacent to the mountain lies Gorongosa National Park, one of Mozambique's main conservation areas. A key issue in recent years has been whether and how to incorporate the upper parts of Mount Gorongosa above 700 m altitude into the existing National Park, which is primarily lowland. [These areas were eventually incorporated into the National Park in 2010.] In recent years the unique biodiversity and scenic beauty of Mount Gorongosa have come under severe threat from the destruction of natural vegetation. This is particularly acute as regards moist evergreen forest, the loss of which has accelerated to alarming proportions.
    [Show full text]
  • Horizontal Gene Transfer Is More Frequent with Increased
    Horizontal gene transfer is more frequent with PNAS PLUS increased heterotrophy and contributes to parasite adaptation Zhenzhen Yanga,b,c,1, Yeting Zhangb,c,d,1,2, Eric K. Wafulab,c, Loren A. Honaasa,b,c,3, Paula E. Ralphb, Sam Jonesa,b, Christopher R. Clarkee, Siming Liuf, Chun Sug, Huiting Zhanga,b, Naomi S. Altmanh,i, Stephan C. Schusteri,j, Michael P. Timkog, John I. Yoderf, James H. Westwoode, and Claude W. dePamphilisa,b,c,d,i,4 aIntercollege Graduate Program in Plant Biology, Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802; bDepartment of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802; cInstitute of Molecular Evolutionary Genetics, Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802; dIntercollege Graduate Program in Genetics, Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802; eDepartment of Plant Pathology, Physiology and Weed Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061; fDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616; gDepartment of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904; hDepartment of Statistics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802; iHuck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802; and jDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 Edited by David M. Hillis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, and approved September 20, 2016 (received for review June 7, 2016) Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) is the transfer of genetic material diverse angiosperm lineages (13, 14) and widespread incorpo- across species boundaries and has been a driving force in prokaryotic ration of fragments or entire mitochondrial genomes from algae evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollen Morphology of the Euphorbiaceae with Special Reference to Taxonomy
    Pollen morphology of the Euphorbiaceae with special reference to taxonomy W. Punt (Botanical Museum and Herbarium, Utrecht) {received December 28th, 1961) CONTENTS Chapter I General Introduction 2 a. Introduction 2 b. Acknowledgements 2 Chapter II History 2 a. Pollen morphology 2 b. Euphorbiaceae 4 Chapter III Material 5 Chapter IV Methods 6 a. Flowers 6 b. Pollen preparations 7 c. Preservation of pollen grains 7 d. Microscopes 8 e. Punched cards 8 f. Drawings 9 Chapter V Some nomenclatural remarks 9 Chapter VI Pollen morphology 10 Chapter VII Glossary 15 Chapter VIII Results 18 A. Pollen grains of the Euphorbiaceae 18 B. Discussion of the results 20 a. Phyllanthoideae 20 Antidesma configuration 20 Amanoa configuration 32 Phyllanthus nutans configuration 37 Breynia configuration 38 Aristogeitonia configuration 40 b. Crotonoideae 47 Croton configuration 47 Cnesmosa configuration 57 Dysopsis configuration 60 Plukenetia configuration 60 Chiropetalum configuration 65 Cephalomappa configuration 68 Sumbavia configuration 69 Bernardia configuration 73 Mallotus configuration 77 Claoxylon configuration 90 Cladogynos configuration 93 Hippomane configuration 95 Summary 106 References 107 Index 110 CHAPTER I GENERAL INTRODUCTION a. Introduction Many investigators have stated (e.g. Lindau 1895, Wodehouse Erdtman that 1935, 1952), pollen morphology can be of great also importance for plant taxonomy, while it was known that in Euphorbiaceae several types of pollen grains exist (e.g. Erdtman 1952). On the suggestion of Professor Lanjouw, who himself has worked on the Euphorbiaceae of Surinam, the author has investigated the pollen grains of this family of that area. From the result it was apparent that in the Surinam different could be Euphorbiaceae many pollen types distinguished.
    [Show full text]
  • D-299 Webster, Grady L
    UC Davis Special Collections This document represents a preliminary list of the contents of the boxes of this collection. The preliminary list was created for the most part by listing the creators' folder headings. At this time researchers should be aware that we cannot verify exact contents of this collection, but provide this information to assist your research. D-299 Webster, Grady L. Papers. BOX 1 Correspondence Folder 1: Misc. (1954-1955) Folder 2: A (1953-1954) Folder 3: B (1954) Folder 4: C (1954) Folder 5: E, F (1954-1955) Folder 6: H, I, J (1953-1954) Folder 7: K, L (1954) Folder 8: M (1954) Folder 9: N, O (1954) Folder 10: P, Q (1954) Folder 11: R (1954) Folder 12: S (1954) Folder 13: T, U, V (1954) Folder 14: W (1954) Folder 15: Y, Z (1954) Folder 16: Misc. (1949-1954) D-299 Copyright ©2014 Regents of the University of California 1 Folder 17: Misc. (1952) Folder 18: A (1952) Folder 19: B (1952) Folder 20: C (1952) Folder 21: E, F (1952) Folder 22: H, I, J (1952) Folder 23: K, L (1952) Folder 24: M (1952) Folder 25: N, O (1952) Folder 26: P, Q (1952-1953) Folder 27: R (1952) Folder 28: S (1951-1952) Folder 29: T, U, V (1951-1952) Folder 30: W (1952) Folder 31: Misc. (1954-1955) Folder 32: A (1955) Folder 33: B (1955) Folder 34: C (1954-1955) Folder 35: D (1955) Folder 36: E, F (1955) Folder 37: H, I, J (1955-1956) Folder 38: K, L (1955) Folder 39: M (1955) D-299 Copyright ©2014 Regents of the University of California 2 Folder 40: N, O (1955) Folder 41: P, Q (1954-1955) Folder 42: R (1955) Folder 43: S (1955) Folder 44: T, U, V (1955) Folder 45: W (1955) Folder 46: Y, Z (1955?) Folder 47: Misc.
    [Show full text]
  • Gardens and Stewardship
    GARDENS AND STEWARDSHIP Thaddeus Zagorski (Bachelor of Theology; Diploma of Education; Certificate 111 in Amenity Horticulture; Graduate Diploma in Environmental Studies with Honours) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy October 2007 School of Geography and Environmental Studies University of Tasmania STATEMENT OF AUTHENTICITY This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for any other degree or graduate diploma by the University of Tasmania or in any other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, this thesis contains no copy or paraphrase of material previously published or written by other persons, except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis or in footnotes. Thaddeus Zagorski University of Tasmania Date: This thesis may be made available for loan or limited copying in accordance with the Australian Copyright Act of 1968. Thaddeus Zagorski University of Tasmania Date: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis is not merely the achievement of a personal goal, but a culmination of a journey that started many, many years ago. As culmination it is also an impetus to continue to that journey. In achieving this personal goal many people, supervisors, friends, family and University colleagues have been instrumental in contributing to the final product. The initial motivation and inspiration for me to start this study was given by Professor Jamie Kirkpatrick, Dr. Elaine Stratford, and my friend Alison Howman. For that challenge I thank you. I am deeply indebted to my three supervisors Professor Jamie Kirkpatrick, Dr. Elaine Stratford and Dr. Aidan Davison. Each in their individual, concerted and special way guided me to this omega point.
    [Show full text]
  • Symphytum Tuberosum Agg
    Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci Přírodovědecká fakulta Katedra botaniky Biosystematická a chorologická studie Symphytum tuberosum agg. ve střední Evropě Diplomová práce Bc. Lucie Kobrlová Vedoucí práce: Doc. RNDr. Bohumil Trávníček, Ph.D. N1051 Botanika Konzultant práce: Mgr. Michal Hroneš prezenční studium Olomouc srpen 2014 © Lucie Kobrlová, 2014 Prohlášení: Prohlašuji, že jsem tuto diplomovou práci vypracovala samostatně pod vedením Doc. RNDr. Bohumila Trávníčka, Ph.D. a Mgr. Michala Hroneše a uvedla jsem všechny literární prameny, ze kterých jsem čerpala. V Olomouci 6. 8. 2014 Podpis: Bibliografická identifikace Jméno a příjmení autora: Lucie Kobrlová Název práce: Biosystematická a chorologická studie Symphytum tuberosum agg. ve střední Evropě. Typ práce: Diplomová práce Pracoviště: Katedra botaniky PřF UP, Šlechtitelů 11, 783 71 Olomouc Vedoucí práce: Doc. RNDr. Bohumil Trávníček, Ph.D. Rok obhajoby práce: 2014 Abstrakt: Okruh Symphytum tuberosum se ve střední Evropě sestává ze dvou majoritních cytotypů, a to z tetraploidů (2n = 4x = 32) a dodekaploidů (2n = 12x = 96). Rozšíření těchto cytotypů bylo stanoveno na základě cytologického studia a herbářových sbírek. Výrazně častěji je zastoupen dodekaploidní cytotyp, který byl prokázán ve všech studovaných státech (tj. AT, CZ, DE, HU, PL a SK). Tetraploidní populace byly doposud zaznamenány pouze na Moravě, dále pak na Slovensku a v Maďarsku. Tetraploidi vykazují zřetelnou vazbu na okraje panonské oblasti. Přestože se oba cytotypy vyskytují obvykle izolovaně, podařilo se nalézt čtyři smíšené populace. Studium morfologické variability prokázalo signifikantní rozdíl mezi majoritními cytotypy. Tetraploidi a dodekaploidi se zároveň liší svými ekologickými preferencemi. Na základě odlišné morfologie, ekologie i rozšíření je lze hodnotit jako samostatné taxony na úrovni poddruhů, a to Symphytum tuberosum subsp.
    [Show full text]