DOCSLIB.ORG

University House Formerly N.E.S.C.A House King Street Newcastle

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
University House Formerly N.E.S.C.A House King Street Newcastle CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN VOLUME 1 OF 3 UNIVERSITY HOUSE FORMERLY N.E.S.C.A HOUSE KING STREET NEWCASTLE Prepared for: Prepared by EJE Heritage APRIL 2011 Ref: 8836-CMP-UH-002 CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN UNIVERSITY HOUSE, NEWCASTLE TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................ 6 1.2 HERITAGE LISTINGS ......................................................................................................................... 7 1.3 SITE AND OWNERSHIP ..................................................................................................................... 8 1.4 CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES ............................................................................................. 8 1.5 ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................................... 8 1.6 DEFINITIONS ..................................................................................................................................... 9 1.7 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 9 2. HISTORY OF UNIVERSITY HOUSE............................................................................................................ 10 2.1 NEWCASTLE’S FIRST INHABITANTS .............................................................................................. 10 2.2 EARLY TOWN DEVELOPMENT AND THE AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURAL COMPANY (A.A. CO.) ... 10 2.3 COMMENCEMENT OF THE CIVIC PRECINCT BUILDING SCHEME ................................................ 11 2.4 THE CONCEPT ................................................................................................................................ 11 2.5 PLANNING N.E.S.C.A HOUSE .......................................................................................................... 12 2.6 THE ARCHITECTS ........................................................................................................................... 13 2.7 ALDERMAN H FENTON.................................................................................................................... 14 2.8 GUY ALLBUT.................................................................................................................................... 14 2.9 DESIGNING N.E.S.C.A. HOUSE ....................................................................................................... 14 2.10 CONSTRUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 15 2.11 LATER EXTENSIONS AND ALTERATIONS ...................................................................................... 20 2.12 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................................. 26 3. PHYSICAL EVIDENCE ............................................................................................................................... 27 3.1 CONTEXT OF THE SITE................................................................................................................... 27 3.2 ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN ...................................................................................... 28 3.3 SUBSEQUENT ALTERATIONS AND ADDITIONS ............................................................................. 29 3.4 REMAINING ORIGINAL STRUCTURE AND INTERPRETATION ....................................................... 30 3.5 GENERAL CONDITION OF THE FABRIC........................................................................................ 37 4. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ....................................................................................................................... 39 4.1 ARCHITECTURAL STYLE................................................................................................................. 39 4.2 EMIL SODERSTEN ........................................................................................................................... 39 5. THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL ENVIRONMENT .................................................................. 42 5.1 LANDSCAPE AND SETTING ............................................................................................................ 42 5.2 UNIVERSITY HOUSE AND VIEWS ................................................................................................... 43 6. HERITAGE SIGNIFICANCE ........................................................................................................................ 47 6.1 HISTORICAL THEMES ..................................................................................................................... 47 6.2 PRE-EXISTING STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE OF NESCA HOUSE: NSW STATE HERITAGE REGISTER ....................................................................................................................................... 48 6.3 NSW HERITAGE ASSESSMENT – ANALYSIS OF SIGNIFICANCE ................................................... 49 6.4 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANCE......................................................................................................... 51 6.5 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE ..................................................................................................... 51 6.6 TREATMENT OF SIGNIFICANT FABRIC .......................................................................................... 51 6.7 FABRIC AND OTHER FEATURES WHICH CONTRIBUTE TO SIGNIFICANCE (LIST OF HERITAGE ITEMS) ............................................................................................................................................. 52 7. CURTILAGE OF UNVERSITY HOUSE ........................................................................................................ 53 8. OBLIGATIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES ...................................................................................................... 54 8.1 CONSTRAINTS & OPPORTUNITIES ARISING OUT OF CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE ....................... 54 Prepared by EJE Heritage Page 1 Nominated Architect – Peter Campbell No. 4294 8836-CMP-Volume 1 of 3.doc CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN UNIVERSITY HOUSE, NEWCASTLE 8.2 STATUTORY CONTROLS ................................................................................................................ 54 8.3 NON-STATUTORY CONTROLS........................................................................................................ 57 8.4 CONSTRAINTS & OPPORTUNITIES ARISING OUT OF HERITAGE CURTILAGE & VIEWS ............. 58 8.5 CONSTRAINTS & OPPORTUNITIES ARISING OUT OF CONDITION & INTEGRITY OF BUILT FABRIC ............................................................................................................................................ 58 8.6 STAKEHOLDERS ............................................................................................................................. 58 8.7 CLIENT’S REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................................. 59 9. CONSERVATION POLICY AND IMPLEMENTATION .................................................................................. 60 9.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 60 9.2 GENERAL POLICY AND STRATEGY................................................................................................ 60 9.3 CARE OF FABRIC ............................................................................................................................ 61 9.4 MAINTENANCE WORKS .................................................................................................................. 64 9.5 USE OF SITE AND BUILDING .......................................................................................................... 65 9.6 APPROPRIATENESS OF USE.......................................................................................................... 65 9.7 NEW WORK POLICIES..................................................................................................................... 65 9.8 NEW WORKS RESULTING FROM STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS ................................................. 67 9.9 RECORDING POLICIES FOR CONSERVATION WORK ................................................................... 67 9.10 POLICIES FOR INTERPRETATION .................................................................................................. 67 9.11 CONSERVING THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE AND SIGNIFICANT SPATIAL RELATIONSHIPS........ 68 10. BIBLIOGRAPHY ......................................................................................................................................... 69 APPENDICES Appendix A: Conservation Terminology Appendix B: Reductions Suggested By the Architect, 25 October 1937 Appendix C: Electrical Engineer and Managers Report Appendix D: Part of 1939 Commemorative Booklet Appendix E: Database Listings from Online Registers for the National Estate and NSW Heritage Branch Appendix F: Minimum Standards of Maintenance and Repair Appendix G: Standard Exemptions Volume 2 Appendix H: Inventory
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Building for the Future Sustainable Spaces Advancing Education & Research
    Building For the Future Sustainable Spaces Advancing Education & Research A ‘Group of Eight’ Sustainable Buildings Showcase 2 The ‘Group of Eight’ comprises Australian National University, Monash University, The University of Melbourne, The University of Sydney, The University of Queensland, The University of Western Australia, The University of Adelaide, and The University of New South Wales. 2 SYDNEY UNIVERSITY 3 Building For the Future Australia’s leading research Universities know the leaders of tomorrow, ascend from the foundations of today. At the forefront of an evolving educational landscape, the ‘Group of Eight’ continuously strive to inspire curiosity, challenge thinking, spark innovation and bring education to life through exceptional teaching in exceptional places. This publication showcases a snapshot of those The University Inkarni Wardii 02 of Adelaide places; world-class, high-performance, sustainable facilities which re-define best practice in tertiary Australian National Jaegar 5 04 University education buildings. Built for the future, these spaces Jaegar 8 06 move beyond basic environmental sustainable design Monash University Green Chemical Futures 08 principles to demonstrate what is possible when clever technology and inspired design intersect. Logan Hall 10 Building 56 12 From living laboratories to thermally sound The University Melbourne Brain Centre 14 environments, reusing the old to make new, and of Melbourne optimising for people and purpose — each building The Peter Doherty Institute 16 for Infection & Immunity
    [Show full text]
  • National Architecture Award Winners 1981 – 2019
    NATIONAL ARCHITECTURE AWARDS WINNERS 1981 - 2019 AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS NATIONAL ARCHITECTURE AWARD WINNERS 1 of 81 2019 NATIONAL ARCHITECTURE AWARDS COLORBOND® Award for Steel Architecture Yagan Square (WA) The COLORBOND® Award for Steel Architecture Lyons in collaboration with Iredale Pedersen Hook and landscape architects ASPECT Studios COMMERCIAL ARCHITECTURE Dangrove (NSW) The Harry Seidler Award for Commercial Architecture Tzannes Paramount House Hotel (NSW) National Award for Commercial Architecture Breathe Architecture Private Women’s Club (VIC) National Award for Commercial Architecture Kerstin Thompson Architects EDUCATIONAL ARCHITECTURE Our Lady of the Assumption Catholic Primary School (NSW) The Daryl Jackson Award for Educational Architecture BVN Braemar College Stage 1, Middle School National Award for Educational Architecture Hayball Adelaide Botanic High School (SA) National Commendation for Educational Architecture Cox Architecture and DesignInc QUT Creative Industries Precinct 2 (QLD) National Commendation for Educational Architecture KIRK and HASSELL (Architects in Association) ENDURING ARCHITECTURE Sails in the Desert (NT) National Award for Enduring Architecture Cox Architecture HERITAGE Premier Mill Hotel (WA) The Lachlan Macquarie Award for Heritage Spaceagency architects Paramount House Hotel (NSW) National Award for Heritage Breathe Architecture Flinders Street Station Façade Strengthening & Conservation National Commendation for Heritage (VIC) Lovell Chen Sacred Heart Building Abbotsford Convent Foundation
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Movement Architecture in Central Sydney Heritage Study Review Modern Movement Architecture in Central Sydney Heritage Study Review
    Attachment B Modern Movement Architecture in Central Sydney Heritage Study Review Modern Movement Architecture in Central Sydney Heritage Study Review Prepared for City of Sydney Issue C x January 2018 Project number 13 0581 Modern Movement in Central Sydney x Heritage Study Review EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study was undertaken to provide a contextual framework to improve understanding post World War II and Modern Movement architecture and places in Central Sydney, which is a significant and integral component of its architectural heritage. Findings x The study period (1945-1975) was an exciting and challenging era that determined much of the present physical form of Central Sydney and resulted in outstanding architectural and civic accomplishments. x There were an unprecedented number of development projects undertaken during the study period, which resulted in fundamental changes to the physical fabric and character of Central Sydney. x The buildings are an historical record of the changing role of Australia in an international context and Sydney’s new-found role as a major world financial centre. Surviving buildings provide crucial evidence of the economic and social circumstances of the study period. x Surviving buildings record the adaptation of the Modern Movement to local conditions, distinguishing them from Modern Movement buildings in other parts of the world. x The overwhelming preponderance of office buildings, which distinguishes Central Sydney from all other parts of NSW, is offset by the presence of other building typologies such as churches, community buildings and cultural institutions. These often demonstrate architectural accomplishment. x The triumph of humane and rational urban planning can be seen in the creation of pedestrian- friendly areas and civic spaces of great accomplishment such as Australia Square, Martin Place and Sydney Square.
    [Show full text]
  • Anzac Parade and Our Changing Narrative of Memory1
    Anzac Parade and our changing narrative of memory1 IAN A. DEHLSEN Abstract Australian historian Ken Inglis once called Canberra’s Anzac Parade ‘Australia’s Sacred Way’. A quasi-religious encapsulation of the military legends said to define our national character. Yet, it remains to be discussed how the memorials on Anzac Parade have been shaped by these powerful and pervasive narratives. Each memorial tells a complex story, not just about the conflicts themselves but also the moral qualities the design is meant to invoke. The Anzac Parade memorials chart the changing perceptions of Australia’s military experience through the permanence of bronze and stone. This article investigates how the evolving face of Anzac Parade reflects Australia’s shifting relationship with its military past, with a particular emphasis on how shifting social, political and aesthetic trends have influenced the memorials’ design and symbolism. It is evident that the guiding narratives of Anzac Parade have slowly changed over time. The once all-pervasive Anzac legends of Gallipoli have been complemented by multicultural, gender and other thematic narratives more attuned to contemporary values and perceptions of military service. [This memorial] fixes a fleeting incident in time into the permanence of bronze and stone. But this moment in our history—fifty years ago—is typical of many others recorded not in monuments, but in the memories of our fighting men told and retold … until they have passed into the folklore of our people and into the tradition of our countries.2 These were the words of New Zealand Deputy Prime Minister J.R. Marshall at the unveiling of the Desert Mounted Corps Memorial on Anzac Parade, Canberra, in the winter of 1968.
    [Show full text]
  • Adam David Morton: Spatial Political Economy
    SPATIAL POLITICAL ECONOMY Adam David Morton In 2000, it was David Harvey in an interview who commented with some lamentation that although The Limits to Capital ‘was a text that could be built on’ it was, sadly in his view, not taken up in that spirit (see Harvey, 1982; Harvey, 2000: 84). The tangible melancholy in this comment seems somewhat incredulous in the years before and since, given the rightly justified centrality of David Harvey’s agenda-setting work in advancing historical-geographical materialism. For many, Harvey delivers the ‘hard excavatory work’ in providing three cuts to understanding 1) the origin of crises embedded in production; 2) the financial and monetary aspects of the credit system and crisis; and 3) a theory of the geography of uneven development and crises in capitalism. The result, in and beyond The Limits to Capital, is a reading of Marx that offers a spatio-temporal lens on uneven geographical development. Put differently, a combined focus on space and time together reveals the spatiality of power and the command over space as a force in shaping capitalism and the conditions of class struggle. Closer to what is now home, it was Frank Stilwell in Understanding Cities & Regions who crafted the term spatial political economy as a way of approaching the concerns of political economy in relation to cities and regions, space and place (Stilwell, 1992). The exhortation here was to give political economy a spatial twist: to develop a spatial political economy able to grapple with the relationship between social processes and spatial form. Moreover, the approach of spatial political economy aims to do so in such a way that would have both a spatial and temporal dimension.
    [Show full text]
  • SL MAGAZINE Winter 2018 State Library of New South Wales NEWS
    –Winter 2018 Vanessa Berry goes underground Message Since I last wrote to you, the Library has lost one of its greatest friends and supporters. You can read more about Michael Crouch’s life in this issue. For my part, I salute a friend, a man of many parts, and a philanthropist in the truest sense of the word — a lover of humanity. Together with John B Fairfax, Sam Meers, Rob Thomas, Kim Williams and many others, he has been the enabling force behind the transformation currently underway at the Library. Roll on October, when we can show you what the fuss is about. Our great Library, as it stands today, is the result of nearly 200 years of public and private partnerships. It is one of the NSW Government’s most precious assets, but much of what we do today would be impossible without additional private support. The new galleries in the Mitchell Building are only one example of this. Our Foundation is currently supporting many other projects, including Caroline Baum’s inaugural Readership in Residence, our DX Lab Fellow Thomas Wing-Evans’ ground-breaking work, the Far Out! educational outreach program, the National Biography Award, the Sydney Harbour Bridge online exhibition (currently in preparation), not to mention the preservation and preparation of our oil paintings for the major hang later this year. All successful institutions need to have a clear idea of what they stand for if they are to continue to attract support from both government and private benefactors. At the first ‘Dinner with the State Librarian’ on 12 April, I addressed an audience of more than 100 supporters about the Library in its long-term historical context — stressing the importance of preserving both oral and written traditions in our collections and touching on the history we share with museums.
    [Show full text]
  • Art Deco Napier, I Have Focused on Three Principal Themes
    6. Comparative analysis 6.1 Introduction When determining what the unique or, at least, special qualities of Napier’s Art Deco precinct are, it is useful to make comparisons with other cities possessing similar concentrations of buildings from a comparable period. Because World Heritage, by definition, transcends the value attached to heritage at a purely national level, it is essential to assess a site such as Napier against comparable international examples. In selecting comparative sites to assist in defining the significance of Art Deco Napier, I have focused on three principal themes. These are, in order of importance: 1. Unified urban environments constructed in the third and fourth decades of the 20th century that possess significant numbers of buildings in the Art Deco, Moderne, Spanish Colonial Revival or related styles. 2. Urban environments that possess groups of Art Deco buildings of outstanding architectural quality. 3. Unified urban environments, irrespective of the period in which they were constructed, that resulted from reconstruction following a catastrophic earthquake. In the past, Napier has been compared with other cities possessing unified townscapes. The most often quoted comparison is that made by Sir Neil Cossons, former head of English Heritage, who stated in 1985 that ‘Napier represents the most complete and significant group of Art Deco buildings in the world, and is comparable with Bath as an example of a planned townscape in a coherent style. Napier is, without doubt, unique’ (DOC 2006: 17). I have not chosen to follow Sir Neil’s lead because I do not feel the comparison with Bath is helpful in defining the distinctive characteristics of Napier.
    [Show full text]
  • AIA REGISTER Jan 2015
    AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS REGISTER OF SIGNIFICANT ARCHITECTURE IN NSW BY SUBURB Firm Design or Project Architect Circa or Start Date Finish Date major DEM Building [demolished items noted] No Address Suburb LGA Register Decade Date alterations Number [architect not identified] [architect not identified] circa 1910 Caledonia Hotel 110 Aberdare Street Aberdare Cessnock 4702398 [architect not identified] [architect not identified] circa 1905 Denman Hotel 143 Cessnock Road Abermain Cessnock 4702399 [architect not identified] [architect not identified] 1906 St Johns Anglican Church 13 Stoke Street Adaminaby Snowy River 4700508 [architect not identified] [architect not identified] undated Adaminaby Bowling Club Snowy Mountains Highway Adaminaby Snowy River 4700509 [architect not identified] [architect not identified] circa 1920 Royal Hotel Camplbell Street corner Tumut Street Adelong Tumut 4701604 [architect not identified] [architect not identified] 1936 Adelong Hotel (Town Group) 67 Tumut Street Adelong Tumut 4701605 [architect not identified] [architect not identified] undated Adelonia Theatre (Town Group) 84 Tumut Street Adelong Tumut 4701606 [architect not identified] [architect not identified] undated Adelong Post Office (Town Group) 80 Tumut Street Adelong Tumut 4701607 [architect not identified] [architect not identified] undated Golden Reef Motel Tumut Street Adelong Tumut 4701725 PHILIP COX RICHARDSON & TAYLOR PHILIP COX and DON HARRINGTON 1972 Akuna Bay Marina Liberator General San Martin Drive, Ku-ring-gai Akuna Bay Warringah
    [Show full text]
  • MASTER AIA Register of Significant Architecture February2021.Xls AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE of ARCHITECTS REGISTER of SIGNIFICANT BUILDINGS in NSW MASTER
    AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS REGISTER OF SIGNIFICANT BUILDINGS IN NSW MASTER O A & K HENDERSON / LOUIS A & K HENDERSON OF MELBOURNE, 1935 1940 1991, 1993, T&G Building 555 Dean Street Albury Albury City 4703473Card HENDERSON rear by LOUIS HARRISON 1994, 2006, 2008 H Graeme Gunn Graeme Gunn 1968-69 Baronda (Yencken House) Nelson Lake Road, Nelson Lagoon Mimosa Rocks Bega Valley 4703519 No Card National Park H Roy Grounds Roy Grounds 1964 1980 Penders Haighes Road Mimosa Rocks Bega Valley 4703518 Digital National Park Listing Card CH [architect not identified] [architect not identified] 1937 Star of the Sea Catholic 19 Bega Street Tathra Bega Valley 4702325 Card Church G [architect not identified] [architect not identified] 1860 1862 Extended 2004 Tathra Wharf & Building Wharf Road Tathra Bega Valley 4702326 Card not located H [architect not identified] [architect not identified] undated Residence Bega Road Wolumla Bega Valley 4702327 Card SC NSW Government Architect NSW Government Architect undated Public School and Residence Bega Road Wolumla Bega Valley 4702328 Card TH [architect not identified] [architect not identified] 1911 Bellingen Council Chambers Hyde Street Bellingen Bellingen 4701129 Card P [architect not identified] [architect not identified] 1910 Federal Hotel 77 Hyde Street Bellingen Bellingen 4701131 Card I G. E. MOORE G. E. MOORE 1912 Former Masonic Hall 121 Hyde Street Bellingen Bellingen 4701268 Card H [architect not identified] [architect not identified] circa 1905 Residence 4 Coronation Street Bellingen Bellingen
    [Show full text]
  • The Journal of Professional Historians Issue Seven, 2020 Circa: the Journal of Professional Historians Issue Seven, 2020 Professional Historians Australia
    Circa The Journal of Professional Historians Issue seven, 2020 Circa: The Journal of Professional Historians Issue seven, 2020 Professional Historians Australia Editor: Christine Cheater ISSN 1837-784X Editorial Board: Carmel Black Neville Buch Emma Russell Richard Trembath Ian Willis Layout and design: Lexi Ink Design Copy editor: Fiona Poulton Copyright of articles is held by the individual authors. Except for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review as permitted by the Copyright Act, no part of this publication may be reproduced by any process without the permission of the author. Address all correspondence to: The Editor, Circa Professional Historians Australia PO Box 9177 Deakin ACT 2600 [email protected] The content of this journal represents the views of the contributors and not the official view of Professional Historians Australia. Cover images: Top: Ivan Vasiliev in an extract from Spartacus during a gala celebrating the reopening of the Bolshoi Theatre, 28 October 2011. http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/13260/photos/10521 Bottom: Hoff’s students Treasure Conlon, Barbara Tribe and Eileen McGrath working on the Eastern Front relief for the Anzac Memorial, Hoff’s studio, 1932. Photograph courtesy McGrath family CONTENTS EDITORIAL . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..III Part one: Explorations Out of the Darkness, into the Light: Recording child sexual abuse narratives HELEN PENROSE, PHA (VIC & TAS) 2 Part two: Discoveries Discoveries to A Women’s Place: Women and the Anzac Memorial DEBORAH BECK, PHA (NSW & ACT). .. 9 Planter Inertia: The decline of the plantation in the Herbert River Valley BIANKA VIDONJA BALANZATEGUI, PHA (QLD). 20 Part three: Reflections DANCE AS PERFORMATIVE PUBLIC HISTORY?: A JOURNEY THROUGH SPARTACUS CHRISTINE DE MATOS, PHA (NSW & ACT) .
    [Show full text]
  • To Be a Californian Was to See Oneself, If One Believed the Lessons the Place Seemed Most Immediately to Offer, As Affected Only
    Coda To be a Californian was to see oneself, if hese quotations from two renowned one believed the lessons the place seemed contemporary authors, one Californian most immediately to offer, as affected only si and the other Australian, serve to by 'nature', which in turn was seen to exist refocus, to bring us back to the intentions simultaneously as a source of inspiration or underlying the writing of these chapters. In renewal ... Much of the California landscape the visual sphere rather than the literary, I has tended to present itself as metaphor ... wanted in this study to consider how people —Joan Didion, Where I was from (2003)1 of Eurocentric cultures, thrust into a new landscape, an unknown geography, were able We can learn to appreciate kinds of landscape with the aid of images to make the place their other than the one we grew up with, to see own. Ending these ruminations in 1935 was what is unique and a source of beauty in them. not an entirely arbitrary decision. Aesthetic But the landscape we most deeply belong to, exchange through reproducible images and that connects with our senses, that glows in a sharing of the emblems of popular culture our consciousness, will always be the one we continued between these two Pacific regions are born into. after this date, and continues still. But in the —David Malouf, A spirit of play (1998)2 early twentieth century historic transforma- tions in art and mass media changed the nature of the concepts of itinerancy, reproducibility and portability. In architecture, the worldwide Depression of the 1930s curtailed construction in Australia and limited direct interaction with the wider world, thus ending any extravagant imitation of Hollywood houses and Spanish Style fantasies.
    [Show full text]
  • Determination 2018 (No 2)
    Australian Capital Territory Public Place Names (Taylor) Determination 2018 (No 2) Disallowable instrument DI2018–213 made under the Public Place Names Act 1989, s 3 (Minister to determine names) 1 Name of instrument This instrument is the Public Place Names (Taylor) Determination 2018 (No 2). 2 Commencement This instrument commences on the day after its notification day. 3 Determination of place names I determine the place names as indicated in the schedule. Ben Ponton Delegate of the Minister for Planning and Land Management 06 July 2018 Authorised by the ACT Parliamentary Counsel—also accessible at www.legislation.act.gov.au Schedule (see cl 3) Division of Taylor – Architects, town planners and urban designers The location of the public places with the following names is indicated on the associated diagram. NAME ORIGIN SIGNIFICANCE Arney Close Peter Arthur Architect Brent Arney Peter Arney trained in architecture with the Perth (c.1927 – 1996) based firm Oldham Boas Ednie-Brown, commencing in 1946. Mentored by Colin Ednie- Brown, Arney rose to become one of the firm’s lead design partners. He is remembered as a key driver of the firm until his retirement in the 1990s. Early in his career he designed the distinctive Parmelia Hotel in central Perth and was involved in many office building projects. He won acclaim for his design of the Cable Beach Club resort in Broome in the 1980s. The international resort’s architectural style uniquely drew upon Broome’s built heritage and associations with the pearling industry. Arney also specialised in the field of medical architecture, designing and building hospitals and homes for the elderly and disabled.
    [Show full text]