The Making of a Postsecular Society Classical and Contemporary Social Theory

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Making of a Postsecular Society Classical and Contemporary Social Theory THE MAKING OF A POSTSECULAR SOCIETY Classical and Contemporary Social Theory Series Editor: Stjepan G. Mestrovic, Texas A&M University, USA Classical and Contemporary Social Theory publishes rigorous scholarly work that re-discovers the relevance of social theory for contemporary times, demonstrating the enduring importance of theory for modern social issues. The series covers social theory in a broad sense, inviting contributions on both ‘classical’ and modern theory, thus encompassing sociology, without being confined to a single discipline. As such, work from across the social sciences is welcome, provided that volumes address the social context of particular issues, subjects, or figures and offer new understandings of social reality and the contribution of a theorist or school to our understanding of it. The series considers significant new appraisals of established thinkers or schools, comparative works or contributions that discuss a particular social issue or phenomenon in relation to the work of specific theorists or theoretical approaches. Contributions are welcome that assess broad strands of thought within certain schools or across the work of a number of thinkers, but always with an eye toward contributing to contemporary understandings of social issues and contexts. Also in the series The Poetics of Crime Understanding and Researching Crime and Deviance Through Creative Sources Edited by Michael Hviid Jacobsen ISBN 978-1-4094-6995-7 Marx and Weber on Oriental Societies In the Shadow of Western Modernity Lutfi Sunar ISBN 978-1-4724-1716-9 Imaginative Methodologies in the Social Sciences Creativity, Poetics and Rhetoric in Social Research Edited by Michael Hviid Jacobsen, Michael S. Drake, Kieran Keohane and Anders Petersen ISBN 978-1-4724-0992-8 The Making of a Postsecular Society A Durkheimian Approach to Memory, Pluralism and Religion in Turkey MASSIMO ROSATI University of Rome ‘Tor Vergata’, Italy Edited and with a foreword by Alessandro Ferrara © Massimo Rosati 2015 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. Massimo Rosati has asserted his right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as the author of this work. Published by Ashgate Publishing Limited Ashgate Publishing Company Wey Court East 110 Cherry Street Union Road Suite 3-1 Farnham Burlington, VT 05401-3818 Surrey, GU9 7PT USA England www.ashgate.com British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library The Library of Congress has cataloged the printed edition as follows: Rosati, Massimo, 1969- The making of a postsecular society : a Durkheimian approach to memory, pluralism and religion in Turkey / by Massimo Rosati. pages cm. -- (Classical and contemporary social theory) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-4724-2312-2 (hardback) -- ISBN 978-1-4724-2313-9 (ebook) -- ISBN 978- 1-4724-2314-6 (epub) 1. Postsecularism--Turkey. 2. Secularism--Turkey. 3. Religion and sociology--Turkey. 4. Cultural pluralism--Turkey. 5. Durkheim, Émile, 1858-1917. 6. Turkey--Religion. I. Title. BL2320.R67 2015 306.609561--dc23 2014030040 ISBN 978-1-4724-2312-2 (hbk) ISBN 978-1-4724-2313-9 (ebk – PDF) ISBN 978-1-4724-2314-6 (ebk – ePUB) II Printed in the United Kingdom by Henry Ling Limited, at the Dorset Press, Dorchester, DT1 1HD Contents List of Figures vii Foreword by Alessandro Ferrara ix Preface xi Acknowledgements xiii Introduction: New Centres, New Stories 1 PART I: A SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY OF POSTSECULAR SOCIETY 1 Centre and Periphery: Social Symbolic Morphology 15 2 Clarifying the Postsecular: A Sociological Reading 33 3 Postsecular Sanctuaries and the Centre: The Sacredness of Sacred Places 47 4 Memory, Trauma and the Work of Rituals: The Dynamics of Symbols 69 PART II: THE TURKISH LABORATORY 5 Centre and Periphery in the History of Republican Turkey: A Symbolic Analysis 83 6 From a Secular to a Postsecular and Post-Kemalist Turkey? The Neo-Ottoman (Democratic) Narrative and the Reconstruction of the Turkish Central Value System 119 7 Mustafa Kemal Atatürk: An Old Symbol in Transformation 175 8 Turning Religious Differences into a Museum: Aya Sofya 201 9 When the Water Finds its Crack: Hrant Dink at the Crossroads of Contemporary Turkey 213 vi The Making of a Postsecular Society 10 Modernities and Religions: The Four Quadrant Model 247 Conclusion: Habap and the Water that Came from Heaven 259 Appendix: Durkheim in Turkey 265 References 275 Index 297 List of Figures 1.1 The formal structure of the centre-periphery model 21 1.2 Cybernetics of the holy 22 1.3 Centre-periphery general model 25 3.1 Social integration/social regulation 61 3.2 Different ways of structuring social space 62 3.3 Categories of social space 63 5.1 Centre-periphery model in Turkey, 1923–1950 95 6.1a Centre-periphery model: Turkey, 1950–2011: Antagonistic centres 169 6.1b Centre-periphery model: Turkey, 1950–2011: New hybrid centres 170 9.1 Window of book and music shop beside the entrance to Sebat Palace 216 9.2 Poster above the entrance to Sebat Palace 217 9.3 Heart-shaped wreath, a centre of focus at the commemoration 218 9.4 The intersection of Halaskargazi caddesi, the street where Dink was killed, and Ergenekon caddesi 223 9.5 The dove as a symbol connected with Hrant Dink 227 9.6 Placards carried at the commemoration: ‘We are all Armenians’, ‘We are all Dink’ 228 9.7 The human circle outside the premises of Agos 233 9.8 Reverence in front of the wreath, the centre of the temporary shrine 234 10.1 Relationships between modernities and religions: The four quadrant model 250 To the memory of Hrant Dink, to Anna, Giovanni, Valentina, Flavio, Marco, Maddalena, Alì and Agop: may they live together differently, as in Hrant’s dream. Foreword My friend Massimo Rosati was just going over the manuscript of this book one more time before sending it to the publisher when, on the morning of 30 January, 2014, a sudden respiratory crisis took him away in less than an hour, aged 44. He had no premonition of what would happen and, like all of us, made plans for the day, the week, the months and the years ahead. The next day he and I were to attend the inaugural session of a Master’s programme and in the afternoon he expected guest speakers for a colloquium that never took place. Contingency could not have sent a stronger reminder of the fragility of all that is human. Not everything human, however, is ephemeral. As imponderable contingency strikes, the impulse is called forth to repair the fabric of meanings left behind by those we love. Massimo and I had been engaged in a continuous dialogue, as colleagues and friends, for over two decades and thus it was not difficult to pick up where he had left his work unfinished. The first part of this book reflects the urgency he felt to complete Habermas’ seminal idea of the postsecular society with a sociological reflection on the diversity of ways in which the ideals of accepting diversity – ‘living together, differently’ as he put it, borrowing from his hero Hrant Dink – and of mutual learning across the religious-secular divide could become a reality. He chose to cross-fertilize the notion of the postsecular with Shils’ theory of society as always comprising a centre and a periphery, no matter how varied and conflict-ridden they might be. As all great sociologists, however, he felt the need to keep his feet solidly on the ground, and his elective ground was Turkey, the focus of the second part of the book. Fascinated by the slow and contested transformation of the secularist imaginary and symbolism of Kemalist Turkey into a more nuanced neo-Ottoman narrative of coexistence and reconciliation with those religious roots that after 1989 had reemerged as a major source of identification, Massimo Rosati dedicated five years of solid research work and countless visits to all parts of Turkey to the writing of this book. He used to read Today’s Zaman every day, made himself familiar with the polemics around the memory of Hrant Dink, the journalist of Armenian origins assassinated in 2007, attended the memorial ceremonies at every anniversary, noting the growth of a germinal new postsecular spirit, and conducted many interviews with protagonists of Turkish intellectual life, all of which he thoroughly and painstakingly documented himself before venturing out any hypothesis. My part in the making of this book has only been that of a compiler who went one more time over the materials, checked the alignment of announced and actual contents, completed references and footnotes, and tried to homogenize x The Making of a Postsecular Society terminology – a technical and editorial role often infused with enthusiasm at rediscovering the theoretical brilliance of my friend, one of the best social theorists of his generation on the European scene. I was not always able to accomplish even these simple functions as completely as I would have wished. The reader will sometimes encounter the phrase ‘note of the ed.’ or ‘(sic)’ when the source of a quote remained unavailable or I was uncertain about its wording. Similarly, a certain oscillation will be noticed between the uses of the often recurring lexemes ‘reflective, reflectivity’ and ‘reflexive, reflexivity’. After consultation with Neil Jordan, ‘our’ editor without whose invaluable help Rosati’s manuscript would not have materialized into a book, the decision has been made not to impose more uniformity on the author’s thinking than we would be confident would not at some point alter his thought.
Recommended publications
  • Identity, Narrative and Frames: Assessing Turkey's Kurdish Initiatives
    ARTICLE IDENTITY, NARRATIVE AND FRAMES: ASSESSING TURKEY’S KURDISH INITIATIVES Identity, Narrative and Frames: Assessing Turkey’s Kurdish Initiatives JOHANNA NYKÄNEN* ABSTRACT In 2009 the Turkish government launched a novel initiative to tackle the Kurdish question. The initiative soon ran into deadlock, only to be un- tangled towards the end of 2012 when a new policy was announced. This comparative paper adopts Michael Barnett’s trinity of identity, narratives and frames to show how a cultural space within which a peaceful engage- ment with the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) would be deemed legiti- mate and desirable was carved out. Comparisons between the two policies reveal that the framing of policy narratives can have a formative impact on their outcomes. The paper demonstrates how the governing quality of firmness fluctuated between different connotations and references, finally leading back to a deep-rooted tradition in Turkish governance. ince 1984 when the PKK commenced its armed struggle against the Turkish state, Turkish security policies have been framed around the SKurdish question with the PKK presented as the primary security threat to be tackled. Turkey’s Kurdish question has its roots in the founding of the republic in 1923, which saw Kurdish ethnicity assimilated with Turkishness. In accordance with the Treaty of Lausanne (1923), only three minorities were and continue to be officially recognized in Turkey: Armenians, Jews and Greeks. These three groups were granted minority status on the basis of their religion. Kurdish identity – whether national, racial or ethnic – was not recognized by the republic, resulting in decades of uprisings by the Kurds and oppressive and * Department assimilative politics by the state.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arts of Memory. the Remembrance of the Armenians in Turkey
    Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/39674 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation. Author: Carikci, A. Title: The arts of memory : the remembrance of the Armenians in Turkey Issue Date: 2016-05-18 Summary Though reports vary, most sources agree that there were approximately two million Armenians in the Ottoman Empire before World War I. In 1915 the Ottoman regime started exterminating the Armenians. The Ottoman propaganda during World War I portrayed Armenians as Russian collaborators and non-patriotic citi- zens of the Ottoman Empire. They were stigmatized as a community that stabbed the Turks in the back and aimed to disintegrate the country for irredentist purposes. Coordination of the genocide was made possible by the telegraph, which informed different provinces to follow rules for decimating the Armenians. The Armenian genocide was implemented in three phases. First, on 24 April 1915, the Armenian elites of Constantinople were rounded up. These operations started with arrests at home or at workplaces by the State Security Office. The Armenian elites were held for twenty-four hours or more in the central Constantinople prison and then taken to Haydarpaşa railway station under police escort. From there, they were transferred to two internment locations: Ayaş and Çankırı. Second, the able-bodied male population were massacred or subjected to forced labour. Third, Armenian women, children and elderly were forced to join death marches into the Syrian desert. One century after the genocide the Turkish state still denies the violence com- mitted against the Armenians. Despite the continuing silence and censorship, there is a plethora of initiatives that commemorate the Armenian genocide in Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Turkey in Europe. Political, Economic, and Foreign Policy
    ISSN 2239-2122 9 IAI Research Papers The EU is changing, Turkey too, and - above all - there is systemic change and crisis all G round, ranging from economics, the spread of democratic norms and foreign policy. LOBAL The IAI Research Papers are brief monographs written by one or N.1 European Security and the Future of Transatlantic Relations, This research paper explores how the EU and Turkey can enhance their cooperation in more authors (IAI or external experts) on current problems of inter- T edited by Riccardo Alcaro and Erik Jones, 2011 URKEY GLOBAL TURKEY national politics and international relations. The aim is to promote the political, economic, and foreign policy domains and how they can find a way out of the stalemate EU-Turkey relations have reached with the lack of progress in accession greater and more up to date knowledge of emerging issues and N. 2 Democracy in the EU after the Lisbon Treaty, IN trends and help prompt public debate. edited by Raaello Matarazzo, 2011 negotiations and the increasing uncertainty over both the future of the European project E after the Eurozone crisis and Turkey’s role in it. UROPE IN EUROPE N. 3 The Challenges of State Sustainability in the Mediterranean, edited by Silvia Colombo and Nathalie Tocci, 2011 A non-profit organization, IAI was founded in 1965 by Altiero Spinel- li, its first director. N. 4 Re-thinking Western Policies in Light of the Arab Uprisings, SENEM AYDIN-DÜZGIT is Assistant Professor at the Istanbul Bilgi University and Senior POLITICAL, ECONOMIC, AND FOREIGN POLICY edited by Riccardo Alcaro and Miguel Haubrich-Seco, 2012 Research Affiliate of the Istanbul Policy Centre (IPC).
    [Show full text]
  • The Arts of Memory. the Remembrance of the Armenians in Turkey
    Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/39674 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation. Author: Carikci, A. Title: The arts of memory : the remembrance of the Armenians in Turkey Issue Date: 2016-05-18 Chapter 1 Exploring Postmemory in Markar Esayan’s Novel Karşılaşma The transmission of traumatic memories to second generations, who have not witnessed the ordeals that their parents went through, has been a central topic in memory studies. This phenomenon concerns the second generations and how they appropriate their parent’s stories that preceded their births. To further explore the particular relationship of the second generations to their parental past, various scholars such as Ellen Fine, Ernst van Alphen, Gabriele Schwab, Celia Lury, Alison Landsberg, Nadine Fresco, Henri Raczymow, Froma Zeitlin, James Young and Marianne Hirsch have examined this subject. Their works have been motivated by the question whether the traumatic recollections of the second generations should be viewed as memory. This relationship has variously been described as an “absent memory” (Ellen Fine), “haunting legacy” (Gabriele Schwab), “inherited memory”, “belated memory” or “prosthetic memory” (Celia Lury, Alison Landsberg), “mémoire des cendres” (Nadine Fresco), “mémoire trouée” (Henri Raczymow), “vicarious witnessing” (Froma Zeitlin), “received history” (James Young) and “postmemory” (Marianne Hirsch).23 The concept of postmemory, developed by Marianne Hirsch, is based on the readings of autobiographical works written by post-Holocaust second generation authors. Hirsch invites us to rethink our relation to literature to explore the effect of traumatic experiences on the second generations. The concept of postmemory provides a new lens to scrutinize the intergenerational memory after the Holocaust.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Zeytin -..Zeytin Eğitim & Danışmanlık
    Referanslar / References 1 Zeytin'in kuruluşunu resmi olarak gerçekleştirdiği 07.05.2012 tarihinden itibaren üstlenilen projeler : The projects, Zeytin has undertaken from the date of May 12th, 2012, which the date of beginning of its activity, are listed below : FEDEX Halkalı Antrepo Binası ve Blue Butique Rezidans, MNG – İstanbul / TÜRKİYE (2012) FEDEX Authorised Shipping Center and Blue Butique Residence, MNG – Istanbul / TURKIYE Erzurum AVM ve Konut Kompleksi (400,000 m2), MNG - Erzurum / TÜRKİYE (2012-2013) Erzurum Shopping Mall and Residence Blocks (400.000 sq.mt.), MNG – Erzurum / TURKIYE Zeytin Yangın Korunum Mühendisliği Eğitim ve Danışmanlık / Fire Protection Engineering & Consultancy Tel/Phone : + 90 312 286 31 77, E-posta/E-mail : [email protected], URL : http//www.zeytindanismanlik.com Referanslar / References 2 Kızıldere Jeotermal Enerji Santralı 60 MWe, POYRAZ / ZORLU –Denizli / TÜRKİYE (2012-2013) Kızıldere Geothermal Power Plant, 60 Mwe, POYRAZ / ZORLU Energy – Denizli / TURKIYE ..... danışmanlık-tasarım ve projelendirme – Consultancy-Design and Project Erzin Doğalgaz Çevrim Santralı 900 MWe, POYRAZ / GAMA – Hatay / TÜRKİYE (2013-2014) Erzin CCGT Power Plant, 900 Mwe, POYRAZ / GAMA – Hatay / TURKIYE ..... danışmanlık-tasarım ve projelendirme – Consultancy-Design and Project Zeytin Yangın Korunum Mühendisliği Eğitim ve Danışmanlık / Fire Protection Engineering & Consultancy Tel/Phone : + 90 312 286 31 77, E-posta/E-mail : [email protected], URL : http//www.zeytindanismanlik.com Referanslar / References
    [Show full text]
  • “Everywhere Is Taksim”: the Politics of Public Space from Nation-Building
    JUHXXX10.1177/0096144214566966Journal of Urban HistoryBatuman 566966research-article2015 Original Research Article Journal of Urban History 1 –27 “Everywhere Is Taksim”: The © 2015 SAGE Publications Reprints and permissions: Politics of Public Space from sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0096144214566966 Nation-Building to Neoliberal juh.sagepub.com Islamism and Beyond Bülent Batuman1 Abstract This article discusses the politics of public space through the particular example of Taksim Square in Istanbul. Tracing Taksim’s history since the early twentieth century, the article analyzes the instrumentalization of public space in nation-building, the socialization of politics within the context of postwar rapid urbanization, and the (re)politicization of public space under neoliberal Islamism. Finally it arrives at an assessment of the nation-wide antigovernment protests that centered on Taksim Square in May–June 2013. Throughout this historical examination, the politics of public space is discussed with reference to the work of Henri Lefebvre, in order to scrutinize the spatial aspects of the relation between state and society. Accordingly, the rise of democratic public space is defined as a result of the mutual interaction between two bottom-up impetuses; the immanent politics of the social (the political character of everyday life) and the socialization of the political (civil political action). Keywords public space, right to the city, banal politicization, Taksim Sqaure, Gezi Park The last days of May 2013 witnessed an unprecedented event in Istanbul. What began as a simple environmentalist protest grew rapidly and spread across the country as a result of police brutality faced by the small group of activists. It all began with the appearance of dozers in Gezi Parkı (literally “esplanade”), the seventy-year-old park adjacent to Taksim Square, the major public space in Istanbul.
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural Mimicry and the Politics of Mosque Building: Negotiating Islam and Nation in Turkey
    The Journal of Architecture ISSN: 1360-2365 (Print) 1466-4410 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rjar20 Architectural mimicry and the politics of mosque building: negotiating Islam and Nation in Turkey Bülent Batuman To cite this article: Bülent Batuman (2016) Architectural mimicry and the politics of mosque building: negotiating Islam and Nation in Turkey, The Journal of Architecture, 21:3, 321-347, DOI: 10.1080/13602365.2016.1179660 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2016.1179660 Published online: 17 May 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 43 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rjar20 Download by: [Bilkent University] Date: 24 June 2016, At: 05:51 321 The Journal of Architecture Volume 21 Number 3 Architectural mimicry and the politics of mosque building: negotiating Islam and Nation in Turkey Bülent Batuman Department of Urban Design and Landscape Architecture, Bilkent University, Turkey (Author’s e-mail address: [email protected]) This paper discusses the politics of mosque architecture in modern Turkey. The classical Ottoman mosque image has been reproduced in state-sponsored mosques throughout the second half of the twentieth century. Defining this particular design strategy as architectural mimicry, I discuss the emergence of this image through the negotiation between the nation- state and the ‘nationalist conservative’ discourse within the context of Cold War geopolitics. Comparing the Turkish case with the Islamic post-colonial world, I argue that the prevalence of architectural mimicry is related to the nostalgia it generates.
    [Show full text]
  • EU-Turkey Relations and the Stagnation of Turkish Democracy
    EU-Turkey Relations and the Stagnation of Turkish Democracy Senem Aydın-Düzgit and E. Fuat Keyman Istanbul Bilgi University and Sabanci University WORKING PAPER 02 EU-Turkey Relations and the Stagnation of Turkish Democracy Senem Aydın-Düzgit and E. Fuat Keyman* Turkey EU Accession Process Democracy Deficit Abstract Introduction The current stagnation of Turkish democracy goes hand in hand with the current impasse in EU-Turkey relations. A combination of domestic Back in August 2004, we published a working paper on the role of factors with a loss of credibility of EU conditionality led to a situation Turkey’s relations with the EU in transforming Turkish democracy in which political reform is substantially stalled and in cases where it as part of a larger project on EU-Turkey relations conducted by the is realised, it is mostly conducted to serve the interests of the ruling Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) and the Economics and political elite and with no real reference to the EU. The virtuous cycle of Foreign Policy Forum (Aydın and Keyman 2004). The central argument reform that characterised the 1999-2005 period has been replaced by of the paper was that the strengthening credibility of EU conditionality a vicious cycle in which lack of effective conditionality feeds into po- towards Turkey, coupled with favourable domestic and international litical stagnation which in turn moves Turkey and the EU further away dynamics resulted in substantial reforms towards the consolidation from one another. of Turkish democracy. The paper, written prior to the EU’s decision to open accession negotiations with Turkey, concluded that the opening of accession talks with the country on the basis of a fair decision that rests on Turkey’s achievements in its modernity and democracy would constitute a crucial step in remedying the remaining problematic aspects of Turkish democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fearless Pursuit to Activism: AYF Senior Seminar 2016 by Dickran Khodanian FRANKLIN, Mass
    Volume 1, Issue 5 Fall 2016 The Fearless Pursuit to Activism: AYF Senior Seminar 2016 By Dickran Khodanian FRANKLIN, Mass. «Միացե՛ք Հայեր, Արցախն է մեզ կանչում»/ “Miyatsek Hayer, Artsakh-neh mez ganchoom”/ Come together Armenians, Artsakh is calling us. The Armenian Youth Federation held its annual senior seminar on the weekend of September 30-October 2 with over 80 attendees at Camp Haiastan. Due to the senior seminar last year and given the circumstances of Artsakh, the central theme of the weekend was based around Artsakh. After being present at the lectures and witnessing the dialogue discussed, the theme of the weekend could not have been more appropriate. Following the Four Day War that took the lives of over a hundred soldiers, the entire global community of Armenians were united in support of Artsakh and were ready to be of any type of assistance to their brothers and sisters in the homeland. This senior seminar became an opportunity for the AYF to inform and educate its membership on the current issues Artsakh and Armenia face in order to stimulate the conversation of how we as young Armenian diasporans could be of service to our homeland. The seminar began with a lecture by a great mentor and Editor of Asbarez News Ara Khachatourian on the historical perspective of Artsakh as well as its relevance to our various fights for justice. Khachatourian began his lecture by mentioning the current situation in Syria and Turkish PM,Garo Paylan’s visit to Los Angeles in the previous week. He informed us on how in the last week, there were 5 deaths in the Armenian community of Syria and that the current situation due to the Syrian Civil War has only been escalating and effecting the Armenian community severely.
    [Show full text]
  • Breaking the Ice: the Role of Civil
    The failure of the 2009 Protocols to establish and develop diplomatic relations between Armenia and Turkey has largely overshadowed the success of civil society organizations in advancing the normalization process over the past decade. This report aims to help address this imbalance through a detailed account Breaking the Ice: of the United States Department of State-funded “Dialogue-Building between Turkey and Armenia” project, implemented by the Global Political Trends Center (GPoT) of Istanbul Kültür University, Internews Network, Internews Armenia, the Yerevan Press Club and CAM Film between September 2010 and December 2011. The Role of Civil Society and Media in Including an introduction that analyzes the current “frozen” state and historical background of Turkish- Armenian relations, Breaking the Ice: The Role of Civil Society and Media in Turkey-Armenia Relations presents the writings and reflections of the dozens of Turkish and Armenian journalists and students who participated in the project. The output of the Dialogue-Building Project demonstrates the continued, if not Turkey-Armenia Relations heightened, importance of civil society and media-based initiatives in the Turkey-Armenia normalization process, post-Protocols. Susae Elanchenny & Narod Maraşlıyan Since its founding in 2008, GPoT Center has played an active role in rapprochement and reconciliation projects between Turkey and Armenia through organizing numerous exchanges, roundtable discussions and conferences with the participation of leading Turkish civil society activists, academics, journalists and retired diplomats. For more information on these projects and GPoT Center, please visit www.gpotcenter.org. ISBN: 978-605-4233-80-9 Breaking the Ice: The Role of Civil Society and Media in Turkey-Armenia Relations An Evaluation of the “Dialogue-Building between Turkey and Armenia” Project Susae Elanchenny & Narod Maraşlıyan April 2012 BREAKING THE ICE: THE ROLE OF CIVIL SOcietY anD MEDia IN TUrkeY-Armenia RELatiOns Istanbul Kültür University Publication No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Collapse of the Peace Process with the Kurds in Turkey
    Back to Square One? The Collapse of the Peace Process with the Kurds in Turkey Gallia Lindenstrauss The Kurdish question is one of the fundamental problems, if not the most important, facing the Turkish republic. Since the 1980s, some 40,000 people have been killed in the violent struggle between Turkey’s central government and the Kurdistan Workers’ Party, the PKK. Serious efforts were made to promote solutions during the tenure of President Turgut Ozal in the early 1990s, but since its rise to power in 2002, the Justice and Development Party has made the most progress on the issue compared to previous governments. Since 2008, and in greater intensity since the end of 2012, Turkey promoted a peace process between the government and the Kurdish minority. However, in July 2015, the process collapsed, leading to renewed violence between the sides, especially in the southeast of the country. Compared to the past, the PKK is putting more emphasis on urban warfare. Consequently, one of the Turkish army’s reactions to the renewed hostilities has been to impose an extended curfew on several neighborhoods and towns with a Kurdish majority, which severely disrupts the population’s routine of life. While past talks between the government and the Kurdish minority have also ended without a resolution and have seen the resumption of fighting, it seems that this time the escalation is more acute. Statements such as that made by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan that Turkey’s objective is “to annihilate” the armed Kurds 1 raise concern that it will be extremely difficult to revive the peace process anytime soon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ideological Discourse of the Islamist Humor Magazines in Turkey: the Case of Misvak
    THE IDEOLOGICAL DISCOURSE OF THE ISLAMIST HUMOR MAGAZINES IN TURKEY: THE CASE OF MISVAK A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY NAZLI HAZAL TETİK IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN THE DEPARTMENT OF MEDIA AND CULTURAL STUDIES JULY 2020 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Yaşar Kondakçı Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Barış Çakmur Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Prof. Dr. Necmi Erdoğan Supervisor Examining Committee Members Assist. Prof. Dr. Özgür Avcı (METU, PADM) Prof. Dr. Necmi Erdoğan (METU, PADM) Prof. Dr. Lütfi Doğan Tılıç (Başkent Uni., ILF) PLAGIARISM I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name: Nazlı Hazal Tetik Signature: iii ABSTRACT THE IDEOLOGICAL DISCOURSE OF THE ISLAMIST HUMOR MAGAZINES IN TURKEY: THE CASE OF MISVAK Tetik, Nazlı Hazal M.S., Department of Media and Cultural Studies Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Necmi Erdoğan July 2020, 259 pages This thesis focuses on the ideological discourse of Misvak, one of the most popular Islamist humor magazines in Turkey in the 2000s.
    [Show full text]