Biology of Sole British Psoccptera, Wits Particular Referemce to Species Frequenting Foliage

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Biology of Sole British Psoccptera, Wits Particular Referemce to Species Frequenting Foliage BIOLOGY OF SOLE BRITISH PSOCCPTERA, WITS PARTICULAR REFEREMCE TO SPECIES FREQUENTING FOLIAGE. By TIMOTHY RICHARD NEW, B.Sc., A.R.C.S. A Thesis presented for the Ph.D. Degree of the University of London. Imperial College Field Station, Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire. 305t 1968. -2- ABSICCT. Aspects of the bioloty of foliage-fregentinaPsocoptera were studied at Silwood. Park, Ascot, Berkshire from Autumn 1965 to Spring 1965.These insects were considered especially in relation to the total arboreal psocid fauna and to their main habitat. i.e. the foliage of different tree species. Psocid samples from litter and from trees were taken concurrently and were counted and identified. DescriTtions of the early stages and life histories of nine species are based on field and laboratory data. Several species were found only on some tree species and numbers of others showed large differences on different trees. Some of the factors that may influence the relative numbers of the same species of Psocoptera on different tree species were investigated. Counts of eggs on different tree species also revealed variations in psocid abundance. Aerial dispersal of Psocoptera was assessed with the aid of suction traps. The potential food supply of psocids on foliage of a range of tree species was compared at different times of the year and also with that consumed by psocids. The fecundity of several psocid species fed on foods from different trees was compared. Laboratory experiments showed that selection of oviposition site was related to characteristics of different leaf surfaces . The biology .of two groups of hymenopterous parasites of Psocoptera were examined, especially in relation to their fecundity and host specificity. A series of arthropods were identified as nredators of psocids and their numbers on different species of trees were compared. • A -3_ CONTENTS Page Introduction 6 Section I. Rearing Methods for Psocortera. 8 Introduction 8 Methods e The effect of temperature and humidity on development 12 Section 2. Early staes and life histories of British foliage- 17 frequenting Psocoptera. Introduction 17 Eggs 17 Nymphs 22 Life Histories 38 Overaintering in some Psocoptera 43 Section 3. Ps000ptera of Leaf Litter. 46 Introduction 46 Extraction Methods 47 Times of Extraction 49 Tyres of litter sampled 49 The Psocoptera obtained 50 Distribution in different types of litter 53 Temporal separation in litter 55 Habitat alternation and re-entry to the litter 55 Section 4. Psocontera on arboreal foliage. 58 Introduction 58 Samplinifs Methods 59 The numbers of psocids on different trees at different times of the year 63 The effect of tree size on psocid numbers 72 Distribution on single trees 73 Section 5. The Dispersal of Psocoptera. 76 Dispersal of nsocid eggs 76 Disnersal of nymhs of foliage-frequentin psocids 76 Dispersal of adults 78 Trapr:una Methods 80 110 -4- Page The numbers and species of Psocoptera trapped 81 Psocoptera in suction traps 81 Variation in catch with height of trap 85 Sex Ratio 86 Psocorte2a on sticky traps 36 Psocontara in water traps and light traps 87 Theaange of psocids that fly 87 The Reproductive State of flying psocids 88 Fli,ht Muscle Autolysis 89 Alary Polyorphism 91 Section 6. The Insect Parasites of Psoco)tera. 95 Introduction 95 Parasites of psocid eggs 95 Methods 97 Early Stages and Life History 97 The effect of host on the parasite I00 Parthenogenesis and Sex ilatio I0I Longevity, ovinosition and fecundity I0I Host finding and specificity 105 Parasites of psocid nymphs and adults 106 Methods 107 Amount of parasitism 108 Early stages and life Histories 109 Effect of parasite on the host 117 Section 7. The Arthropod Predators of Psocoptera 119 Introduction 119 on The numbers and kinds of arthromXnredatorsdilierent tree species Predators taken with psocid prey 121 Selection of prey in the laboratory 122 Section 8. Distribution and Mortality of eggs of foliage- frequenting Psocoptera. 124 Introduction 124 Methods 124 The numbers of egg batches on different trees 127 Mortality o overwintering eggs from different sites 129 Function of web covering egg batches 130 -5- Page Section 9. Ovinosition and fecundity of foliage-frequenting Psocoptera. 134 Introduction 134 The female reproductive system 134 The number of egg batches laid 138 The effect of food on fecundity 140 Selection of oviposition sites 14I Smoothness of surface 142 Chemical properties 143 Shape of leaves 145 Movement of leaves 145 Section 10. The leaf surface and psocid food. 148 Introduction 148 The potential food of psocids on leaf surfaces 148 Techniques for examination of leaf microflora and debris 149 The amounts, types and dispersion of adventitious matter on some leaf surfaces 150 The actual food of foliage frequenting psocids 156 Section II. Discussion. 162 Summary. 171 Acknowledgments. 175 References. 176 Appendix I. 186 Appendix 2. (Tables) 187 -6- INTROD.T.ETI011. Psocoptera are one of the more neglected orders of insects, and have attracted the attention of very few entomologists. Yost species have no economic importance and all are siAall and inconspicuous. Nearly 90 species have been recorded from Britain (Broadhead, 1964), and these may be divided into three broad ecological groups: I. Species associated with stored products, soil and ground litter, birds' nests and similar habitats. 2. Species found mainly on bark of many kinds of trees. 3. Species found mainly on arboreal foliage, rarely on bark. Pearman (1928a,b,c) in a series of classic papers laid the foundations of biological knowledge of the British. Psocoptera and since then Broadhead and Hobby (1944) have discussed the biology of a species of Liposcelis fltc,:Lenting stored products and Broadhead and Thornton (1955), Broadhead (1958) and Broadhead and Y:apshere (1966a,b) have given detailed accounts of the ecology of various species in the second of the above groups. No comprehensive accounts exist of the biology and ecology of species in the third category, i.e. the foliage-frequenting psocids. The present work is an attempt to provide such an account. Nine species are considered namely Trichowocus dalii (Mclachlan), Ectqpsocus briggsi Stenossocus immaculatus (Stephens), S.stigmaticus (Imhoff and Labram), Graphoosocus .3ruciatus (L.), Caecilius burmeisteri Brauer, C. flavidus (Stephens), C. fupoppterus (Latreille in Coquebert) and C. kolbei Tetens. The last seven belong to the Polypsocidae, and the other two to the PseudocaecilLidae. The familiar classification of these insects is in doubt, but the above groupings, and all nomenclature in this thesis follows that given in the most recent list of British specjies (Broadhead,I964) (see, howeyer,,Lee. and Thornton, 1967 t.Thornton and Wong 1967 ;Smithers,;I967'). The biology of Ectopsocus briggsis which is found. in a variet, of habitats, was discussed by 1eber (1931) and Sofner (1941), but only fragmentary accounts exist of some aspects of the bionomics of the more characteristic foliage-frequenting psocids which belong 1,- 1 the Polypsocidae ( Nelbe,IS604 Ludwig, 1908; Rule, 1916; Stagers 1917; Pearmans 1928asbsc; Modem, 1951; Broadhead and 71apsheresI960) It was hoped to describe the life histories of all arboreal foliage-fregenting psocids found in Britain, but one species (Enderleinella obsoleta (Stephens)) has not been found during the present study, and it has not been possible to obtain material from elsewhere. The other nine species were collected at Silwood Parks Berkshire, where most of the work described in the following pages was carried out. They all oviposit on foliage, and all stages live on and feed from loaf surfaces. The aim of this work was to investigate the biolagy of this group of psocithis to relate it to the total psocid fauna on trees, and also to the foliage that they frogent. In a study limited to two to three seasons it seemed more valuable to investigate bionomics on the broadest possible basis, and to lay a foundation for future more detailed work, rather tan to concentrate or. one aspect in detail. Descriptions of the life histories and of early stages are followed by data on the nunbers of psocids in leaf litterand on a number of tree species. Various factors influencing the numbers of foli .,-e-freqenting psocids on different trees are considered in later sections of this thesis. Literature relevant to each section is quoted in context. Tables of detailed data arc given in appendices, but figures are placed in context. SECTION 1. nearing Methods for Psocoptera Introduction. CoApacatively few authoEs ha,:e attempted to rear species of foliage-frequenting psocids, but there are several accounts of rearing stored-products psocids (see Broadhead and Fobby, 19443 Broadhead, 1961; Allen, 1960; Finlayson, 1949), and bark-frequenting psocids (aroadhead, 1947; 7]ertmoed, 1966; Jentsch, 19'59; Mockiord, 1957 Seiner, 1941; Sommerman, 1943 a, b, c, 1944). All methods used ace essentially similar, and provide for the ,aintenance of a high humidity and easy renewal of food supply. Thornton and Broadhead (1954) found that laboratory attempts to rear Elinsocus resulted in a very high mortality. There are no complete accounts of rearing arboreal Polypsocidae, although Medem (1951) .,fives S02.j fragmentary data. Peo=tn (in lit. 1967) did not succeed in rearing foliage-frequenting psocids, but he found that the other types were easier to breed. Several foliage species were maintained by Schneider (1955) in the laboratory, but he omits any account of rearing methods. During the present work, 31 species of psocids were reared in the laboratory through at least one a)mplete generation. Hortality and duration of development of sonic were compared under conditions of standard temperature and relative humidity. The species represented a wide range of ecological types, from those in stored products to the nine species of foliae frequenters here discussed. Aethods. Several kinds of rearing containers wee used with varying degrees of success. The most useful methods are of general application but others were designed foe special purposes, whioh are mentioned in • -9- context.
Recommended publications
  • Local and Regional Influences on Arthropod Community
    LOCAL AND REGIONAL INFLUENCES ON ARTHROPOD COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND SPECIES COMPOSITION ON METROSIDEROS POLYMORPHA IN THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN ZOOLOGY (ECOLOGY, EVOLUTION AND CONSERVATION BIOLOGy) AUGUST 2004 By Daniel S. Gruner Dissertation Committee: Andrew D. Taylor, Chairperson John J. Ewel David Foote Leonard H. Freed Robert A. Kinzie Daniel Blaine © Copyright 2004 by Daniel Stephen Gruner All Rights Reserved. 111 DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to all the Hawaiian arthropods who gave their lives for the advancement ofscience and conservation. IV ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Fellowship support was provided through the Science to Achieve Results program of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and training grants from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and the National Science Foundation (DGE-9355055 & DUE-9979656) to the Ecology, Evolution and Conservation Biology (EECB) Program of the University of Hawai'i at Manoa. I was also supported by research assistantships through the U.S. Department of Agriculture (A.D. Taylor) and the Water Resources Research Center (RA. Kay). I am grateful for scholarships from the Watson T. Yoshimoto Foundation and the ARCS Foundation, and research grants from the EECB Program, Sigma Xi, the Hawai'i Audubon Society, the David and Lucille Packard Foundation (through the Secretariat for Conservation Biology), and the NSF Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant program (DEB-0073055). The Environmental Leadership Program provided important training, funds, and community, and I am fortunate to be involved with this network.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropods and Other Biota Associated with the Azorean Trees and Shrubs: Juniperus Brevifolia
    Arquipelago - Life and Marine Sciences ISSN: 0873-4704 Arthropods and other Biota associated with the Azorean Trees and Shrubs: Juniperus brevifolia RUI NUNES, R. GABRIEL, R.B. ELIAS, F. RIGAL, A.O. SOARES, P. CARDOSO & P.A.V. BORGES Nunes, R., R. Gabriel, R.B. Elias, F. Rigal, A.O. Soares, P. Cardoso & P.A.V. Borges 2015. Arthropods and other Biota associated with the Azorean Trees and Shrubs: Juniperus brevifolia. Arquipelago. Life and Marine Sciences 32: 19-48. Appendix I-IV. This work aims to characterize the arthropods and other biota (lichens, bryophytes, vascular plants and birds) associated with the Azorean endemic tree, Juniperus brevifolia. This is the first of a series of publications that will (i) provide a comprehensive list of all the biota associated with the main Azorean endemic trees and shrubs, (ii) describe in detail the diver- sity, abundance and spatial patterns of canopy arthropods, and (iii) whenever possible, to extend biodiversity assessments to communities of bryophytes, lichens, vascular plants and vertebrates. We use standardized sampled data from BALA project for canopy arthropods and for the remaining taxa we surveyed literature data and the Herbarium of University of Azores. Juniperus brevifolia occurs in a wide range of elevation belts in Azores and accommodates a remarkable large number of taxa: besides canopy arthropods (161 species) it is also an important substrate to other vascular species (six species), bryophytes (105 spe- cies), lichens (106 species) and also birds (four species). In addition, the species richness and particularly the abundance of endemics are dominant, and the number of conservation concern species for bryophytes is noteworthy (30 out of 70).
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of the Type of Storage on Pest Infestation of Stored Grain in the Czech Republic
    The influence of the type of storage on pest infestation of stored grain in the Czech Republic V. Stejskal1, J. Hubert1, Z. Kučerová1, Z. Munzbergová2, 3, J. Lukáš1, E. Žďárková1 1Research Institute of Crop Production, Prague-Ruzyně, Czech Republic 2Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic 3Botanical Institute, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Průhonice, Czech Republic ABSTRACT Stored-product pests cause high economic losses by feeding on stored grain and endanger the public health by contamina- tion of food by allergens. Therefore, the aim of this work was to explore whether the risk of infestation of stored grain by pests is different in various types of storage premises. We compared the level of infestation and the pest species compo- sition in the two main types of grain stores in Central Europe that includes horizontal flat-stores (HFS) and vertical silo- stores (elevators) (VSS). A total of 147 grain stores located in Bohemia, Czech Republic was inspected. We found that both types of stores were infested with arthropods of three main taxonomic groups: mites (25 species, 120 000 individu- als), psocids (8 species, 5 600 individuals) and beetles (23 species, 4 500 individuals). We found that VSS and HFS differ in species composition of mites, psocids and beetles. However, the primary grain pests (i.e. Lepidoglyphus destructor, Acarus siro, Tyrophagus putrescentiae, Lachesilla pedicularia, Sitophilus oryzae, Rhyzopertha dominica, Oryzaephilus surinamensis and Cryptolestes ferrugineus) occurred in both types of stores. The only exception was higher frequency and abundance of two serious beetle-pests (Tribolium castaneum, Sitophilus granarius) in HFS than in VSS.
    [Show full text]
  • Malaise-Hyönteispyynti Lapin Suojelualueilla 2012–2014
    Jukka Salmela, Stefan Siivonen, Patrycja Dominiak, Antti Haarto, Kai Heller, Juhani Kanervo, Petri Martikainen, Matti Mäkilä, Lauri Paasivirta, Aki Rinne, Juha Salokannel, Guy Söderman ja Pekka Vilkamaa Malaise-hyönteispyynti Lapin suojelualueilla 2012–2014 Metsähallituksen luonnonsuojelujulkaisuja. Sarja A 221 Jukka Salmela, Metsähallitus, Lapin luontopalvelut, jukka.salmela(at)metsa.fi Stefan Siivonen, Metsähallitus, Lapin luontopalvelut, stefan.siivonen(at)metsa.fi Patrycja Dominiak, Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Parasitology, University of Gdansk, heliocopris(at)gmail.com Antti Haarto, Mietoinen, ahaarto(at)gmail.com Kai Heller, Quickborn, kaiheller(at)gmx.de Juhani Kanervo, Turku, jussi.kanervo(at)luukku.com Petri Martikainen, Juva, petri.martikainen(at)uef.fi Matti Mäkilä, Rovaniemi, makila.entomology(at)gmail.com Lauri Paasivirta, Salo, lauri.paasivirta(at)suomi24.fi Aki Rinne, Helsinki, aki.rinne(at)pintakasittelytekniikka.fi Juha Salokannel, Tampere, juha.salokannel(at)gmail.com Guy Söderman, Helsinki, guy.soderman(at)pp.inet.fi Pekka Vilkamaa, Luonnontieteellinen keskusmuseo, Helsingin yliopisto, pekka.vilkamaa(at)helsinki.fi Kansikuva: Malaise-pyydys Pallas–Yllästunturin kansallispuiston Röyninkurussa 2013. Lähteisten latvapurojen varret, varsinkin sellaiset joita ympäröi luonnontilainen havu- metsä, ovat monimuotoisia elinympäristöjä. Tältä paikalta havaittiin mm. Euroopalle uusi sienissääskilaji Mycetophila monstera, erittäin harvinainen pikkuvaaksiainen ou- taruskokirsikäs (Limonia messaurea) ja pohjoinen surviaissääski
    [Show full text]
  • Wyre Forest Oak Fogging Project Wyre Forest Study Group
    Wyre Forest Study Group Wyre Forest Oak Fogging Project ED. RosemarY Winnall Natural England Tree 2 Tree 3 Tree 1 Fogging tree 3 Katrina Dainton Introductory Notes by Mick Blythe The samples collected were excellent, due to both the success of the operation and the nature of the oak In the summer of 2015 Katy Dainton and Alice James tree which had a number of exciting dead and rotten of Natural England sampled the canopy of three oak branches low down in the canopy. trees in the Wyre Forest using the fogging technique. In this technique a powered fogger is used to blow a Tree 2 was a 100 year old oak tree in the PAWS fog of insecticide up through the canopy of the tree section of Longdon Wood, SO75141 77757, sampled and the dead or stunned arthropods are collected in on 24/06/2015. The understorey was ankle to knee funnels or on tarpaulins set out on the ground below. length bracken and bramble. The same method was employed except that the tarpaulins were set out at Tree 1, an 80-100 year old oak tree with no woody 5:00 a.m. on the morning of the fogging. The fogging understorey at SO76182 74811 was sampled on was carried out at 5:40 as Tree 1. 16/06/2015. The fogger used was a PulsFOG K-10-SP portable thermal fogger and the insecticide a 10% This experiment was less successful. The insecticidal solution of Permethrin. 15 tarpaulins were set out fog would not rise higher than the lower third of the beneath the chosen tree the day before.
    [Show full text]
  • Species List
    The species collected in all Malaise traps are listed below. They are organized by group and are listed in the order of the 'Species Image Library'. ‘New’ refers to species that are brand new to our DNA barcode library. 'Rare' refers to species that were only collected in one trap out of all 59 that were deployed for the program.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior
    L/J'T United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE PATUXENT WILDLIFE RESEARCH CENTER LAUREL, MARYLAND 20708 DEC 12 1986 Memorandum To: All Staff, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center (PWRC) Migratory Bird Management Office - Laurel (MBMO-L) From: Project Leader, Section of Planning and Development Subject: Species List Attached is a presence/absence species list for PWRC and vicinity prepared by the section of Planning and Development. This list was prepared by combining three species lists from: Committee of Biologists for Preservation of Natural Areas. 11 BP. ltsvi lle Federal Master Plan Area, Biological and Research Values and Recommendations for Land Use Master Planning. 11 Silver Spring, MD. Draft: Dec. 1976 Department of Army. 11 Draft Overall Installation Environmental Impact Statement, Existing Activities and Conditions. 11 The Environmental and Energy Control Office, Fort Geor9e Meade, MD, March 1979. Hotchkiss, Neil and Robert E. Stewart. Vegetation and Vertebrates of the Patuxent Wildlife Research Center: Laurel, MD, Original Edition, July 1947, Revised 1979. The list was developed for use in planning and for general reference in an 8 l / 2 x 11 format . Because we would like this list to be as up-to-date as possible, please review this draft and make any corrections or copies you think are necessary. We would like to finalize the draft and make it available for use by the end of January. Comments and corrections can be sent to the section of Planning and Development, attn: Kheryn. Thank yo help and expertise. Attachment PRELIMINARY SPECIES LIST PATUXENT WILDLIFE RESEARCH CENTER AND VICINITY CONTENTS Note Species Lists Vascular Plants Insects Butterflies and Moths Fishes Amphibians and Reptiles Birds Mammals References Note This presence/absence species list was assembled from three primary sources, listed at the end.
    [Show full text]
  • Insecta: Psocodea: 'Psocoptera'
    Molecular systematics of the suborder Trogiomorpha (Insecta: Title Psocodea: 'Psocoptera') Author(s) Yoshizawa, Kazunori; Lienhard, Charles; Johnson, Kevin P. Citation Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 146(2): 287-299 Issue Date 2006-02 DOI Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/43134 The definitive version is available at www.blackwell- Right synergy.com Type article (author version) Additional Information File Information 2006zjls-1.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKZOJZoological Journal of the Linnean Society0024-4082The Lin- nean Society of London, 2006? 2006 146? •••• zoj_207.fm Original Article MOLECULAR SYSTEMATICS OF THE SUBORDER TROGIOMORPHA K. YOSHIZAWA ET AL. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2006, 146, ••–••. With 3 figures Molecular systematics of the suborder Trogiomorpha (Insecta: Psocodea: ‘Psocoptera’) KAZUNORI YOSHIZAWA1*, CHARLES LIENHARD2 and KEVIN P. JOHNSON3 1Systematic Entomology, Graduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8589, Japan 2Natural History Museum, c.p. 6434, CH-1211, Geneva 6, Switzerland 3Illinois Natural History Survey, 607 East Peabody Drive, Champaign, IL 61820, USA Received March 2005; accepted for publication July 2005 Phylogenetic relationships among extant families in the suborder Trogiomorpha (Insecta: Psocodea: ‘Psocoptera’) 1 were inferred from partial sequences of the nuclear 18S rRNA and Histone 3 and mitochondrial 16S rRNA genes. Analyses of these data produced trees that largely supported the traditional classification; however, monophyly of the infraorder Psocathropetae (= Psyllipsocidae + Prionoglarididae) was not recovered. Instead, the family Psyllipso- cidae was recovered as the sister taxon to the infraorder Atropetae (= Lepidopsocidae + Trogiidae + Psoquillidae), and the Prionoglarididae was recovered as sister to all other families in the suborder.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Insecta: Psocodea: Psocomorpha
    1 for submission to Insect Systematics & Diversity (ISD-2020-0035) 2 3 Systematic Position of the Enigmatic Psocid Family Lesneiidae (Insecta: 4 Psocodea: Psocomorpha), with Description of Two New Species 5 6 Kazunori Yoshizawa,1,6 Yuri M. Marusik,2,3,4 Izumi Yao,1 and Charles Lienhard 5 7 8 1 SystematiC Entomology, SChool of AgriCulture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8589, Japan 9 2 Institute for BiologiCal Problems of the North RAS, Portovaya Str.18, Magadan, Russia 10 3 Department of Zoology & Entomology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South 11 AfriCa 12 4 ZoologiCal Museum, Biodiversity Unit, University of Turku, FI-20014, Finland 13 5 Geneva Natural History Museum, CP 6434, CH-1211 Geneva 6, Switzerland 14 15 6 Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] 16 17 18 Abstract 19 The systematiC plaCement of an enigmatiC psocid family restriCted to AfriCa, Lesneiidae, 20 was estimated by using a multiple gene data set. The candidates for its close relatives are now 21 Classified under two different infraorders, the family Archipsocidae of the infraorder Archipsocetae 22 or the families Elipsocidae/Mesopsocidae of the infraorder Homilopsocidea. The maximum 23 likelihood and Bayesian analyses of the moleCular data set strongly suggested that the Lesneiidae 24 belongs to Homilopsocidea and forms a clade with Elipsocidae/Mesopsocidae/EolaChesillinae 25 (LaChesillidae). However, the relationships among these (sub)families and Lesneiidae, including the 26 monophyly of Elipsocidae and MesopsoCidae, were ambiguous or questionable, showing the 27 neCessity of further investigations for elucidating their relationships and validating the status of 28 these families.
    [Show full text]
  • PSOCOPTERA – BARKFLIES by Alan R
    NEGLECTED INSECTS IN BEDFORDSHIRE Beds Natural History Society Conference PSOCOPTERA – BARKFLIES by Alan R. Outen & Ian K. Dawson PSOCOPTERA Barkflies and Booklice (also sometimes referred to as Psocids) Small insects (1.5 – 7mm) with a domed postclypeus (the area at the front of the head between antennae and mouth); long filiform antennae; simple wing venation with two ‘triangular’ cells at tip of forewing; tendency to run rather than fly. Winged barkflies usually hold their wings tent-wise over their abdomens like miniature lacewings. These species can be confused with Psyllids but can be distinguished by gently touching them – psyllids jump away, barkflies don’t. Stenopsocus immaculatus – a common species in Beds. Note the strongly domed postclypeus and long filiform antennae Barkflies - Variations on a theme Some species don’t have full-sized (macropterous) wings but have them much reduced (brachypterous) or absent (apterous). They can be confused with springtails (which however will jump away when touched). Cerobasis guestfalica has been Embidopsocus enderleini recorded from several Beds sites An uncommon species not (yet) found in Beds Available Resources • Excellent British Barkflies website which via the gallery has been brilliant in facilitating identification of this group making them accessible to all. • 2005 RES Handbook is also very good. • Keith Alexander who runs the National Recording Scheme is very helpful. Graphopsocus cruciatus – a common and distinctive Bedfordshire species THE 2005 RES handbook is also excellent with keys that are much easier to follow than many mycological ones ! …….. A Stereo zoom binocular microscope is very useful though not essential ….. …….It is remarkable what can be achieved with the aid of digital photography !! Stenopsocus immaculatus PSOCOPTERA – BARKFLIES 98 British spp in total of which 69 live outdoors, the rest are synanthropic.
    [Show full text]
  • Psocoptera of Muogamarra Nature Reserve
    AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS Smithers, C. N., 1977. Psocoptera of Muogamarra Nature Reserve. Records of the Australian Museum 31(7): 251–306. [31 December 1977]. doi:10.3853/j.0067-1975.31.1977.215 ISSN 0067-1975 Published by the Australian Museum, Sydney naturenature cultureculture discover discover AustralianAustralian Museum Museum science science is is freely freely accessible accessible online online at at www.australianmuseum.net.au/publications/www.australianmuseum.net.au/publications/ 66 CollegeCollege Street,Street, SydneySydney NSWNSW 2010,2010, AustraliaAustralia THE PSOCOPTERA OF MUOGAMARRA NATURE RESERVE by C. N. SMITHERS The Australian Museum, Sydney SUMMARY In a preliminary study Psocoptera were periodically collected from eight habitats in Muogamarra Nature Reserve, near Sydney. Forty-three species were taken of which fifteen are described as new. Rainforest and Casuarina habitats yielded the greatest variety of species. Populations were highest in summer on Casuarina and showed little seasonal variation in rainforest; dry sclerophyll habitats, on the other hand, yielded greater populations in winter than summer. In each habitat one or two species were dominant. Acacia floribunda and Eucalyptus spp. were poorest in species and specimens. INTRODUCTION During the latter part of 1973 and through most of 1974 collections of Psocoptera were made at intervals from selected habitats in Muogamarra Nature Reserve. Psocoptera had not previously been recorded from the Reserve. The object of the work was to ascertain which species were present and to obtain some indication of any gross habitat preferences or seasonal fluctuations in numbers, if any, as a basis for planning future, more detailed, biological and ecological work. The basic information necessary for rational planning of such work has not been available for Australian species and very little appropriate work which might be applicable to Australian conditions has been done elsewhere.
    [Show full text]