DOCSLIB.ORG

Zyklon B, Auschwitz, and the Trial of Dr. Bruno Tesch

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Journal of Historical Review ------ William B. Lindsey Zyklon B, Auschwitz, and the Trial of Dr. Bruno Tesch H. Keith Thompson Grand Admiral Karl Doenitz: Last President of a United Germany James B. Whisker Gnostic Origins of Alfied Rosenberg 's Thought L.A. Rollins mp Yehuda Bauer and the 'Polemical and Apologetic Bias ' of Jewish Historiography -Book Reviews - -News and Comment- Volun~eFour, Nltntber Three Fa11 1983 - The Journal of Historical Review VOLUME FOUR, NUMBER THREE / FALL 1983 Zyklon B, Auschwitz, and the Trial of Dr. Bruno Tesch by William B. Lindsey Grand Admiral Karl Doenitz: Last President of a United Germany by H. Keith Thompson Gnostic Origins of Alfred Rosenberg's Thought by James B. Whisker BOOK REVIEWS: L.A. Rollins on A History of the Holocaust Mark Weber on Das Hossbach-'Protokoll': Die Zerstoerung Einer Legende Charles Lutton on Paris in the Third Reich: A History of the German Occupation, 1940-1944 The Journal of Historical Review is published quarterly by the INSTITUTE FOR HISTORICAL REVIEW Thomas J. Marcellus, Director Keith Stimely, Editor EDITORIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE WALTER B. ALLENDE, Ph.D. SAMUEL E. KONKIN I11 University of Buenos Aires The New Libertarian Buenos Aires, Argentina Long Beach. California AUSTIN J. APP, Ph.D. MARTIN A. LARSON. Ph.D. La Salle College (Ret.) The Spotlight ,/, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Washington, D.C. GEORGE ASHLEY, Ph.D. WILLIAM B. LINDSEY. Ph.D. Los Angeles Unified School District Research Chemist History Instructor JOHN BENNETT JAMES J. MARTIN, Ph.D. Victoria Council for Civil Liberties Ralph Myles Publishers Melbourne, Australia Colorado Springs, Colorado ARTHUR R. BUTZ, Ph.D. REVILO P. OLIVER, Ph.D. Northwestern University University of Illinois (Ret.) Evanston, Illinois Urbana, Illinois ROBERT FAURISSON, Ph.D. WILHELM STAEGLICH, Dr. Jur. (Ret.) University of Lyon-2 Badenweiler, West Germany Lyon, France UDO WALENDY, Diplo. Pol. DITLIEB FELDERER Verlag fuer Voiksturn und Revisionist History Magazine Zeitgeschichtsforschung Taby, Sweden Vlotho/Weser, West Germany PERCY L. GREAVES, Jr. CHARLES E. WEBER. Ph.D. Free Market Books University of Tulsa (Ret.) Dobbs Ferry, New York Tulsa, Oklahoma ANDREAS R. WESSERLE, Ph.D. Marquette University (Ret.) Milwaukee. Wisconsin The Journal of Historical Review is published quarterly by the Institute for Historical Review, P.O. Box 1306, Torrance. Cali- fornia 90505. United States of America. Subscription prices are as follows: One year. $30; two years, $50; three years. $70-or the equivalent in foreign currency. Foreign subscribers must t~dd $5 if paying by remittarice drewn on a foreign benk. For domestic first class delivery add $5 per year. For overseas air delivery add $12 per year. Qun~ititysubscription and bulk issue rates avail- able on request. Appropriate manuscripts are welcomed by the editor, but must be accompanied by return postage. Jd Listed: Library of Congress British Library Encyclopedia of Associations Writers Market 1983 PTLA Ca tnlog EBSCO Librarians Handbook ISSN: 0195-6752 Institute for Historical Review P.O. Box 1306, Torrance, California 90505, U.S.A. Permission is hereby granted for reprints of any article con- 'tained herein. providing that no changes or alterations are made prior to printing, and also providing that the following attribution appears with the article: Reprinted by permission of The Journal of Historical Review, P.O. Box 1306. Torrance, California 90505, United States of America. Subscription rate: $30 per year. Two copies of each printing should be submitted to the Editor of The journal of Historical Review. Contents Trial of Dr. Bruno Tesch William B. Lindsey Grand Admiral Karl Doenitz: Last President of a United Germany 305 H. Keith Thompson Gnostic Origins of Alfred Rosenberg's Thought James B. Whisker Review Article Yehuda Bauer and the 'Polemical and, Apologetic Bias' of Jewish Historiogr-y 357 L.A. Rollins Book Reviews News and Comment 3 78 About the Contributors A Note From The Editor One of the first. most predictable reactions to be counted on by revisionist historians of World War I1 and of National Socialist Germany as they regale the uniniated with their views is: "But what about the trials-Nuremberg, and the others? Have they not left a record of ample proof of German crime and barbarity-thus vindicating the Allied struggle as a moral one that had to be waged?" The trials of the Germans have indeed left quite a record. And though real historians and historical thinkers (there remained a few even after the intellectual strai~htjacket descended on the West for the duration) have always expressed the most-extreme skepticism at, even contempt for, the idea that the true history of an epoch can be established by the evidence generated in politically motivated, rigged and farcical show-trials of the conquered by those who had beaten them down and had to keep them down, nevertheless it would be wrong to dismiss the historical value of such trials out of hand. Above all these trials did indeed generate evidence--of whatever kind and quality. And the historian is interested in any evidence. For him nothing is out of bounds. Unlike the judge or jury in a legal proceeding, he cannot be foresworn or constrained to totally dismiss or ignore any point of evidence because it was not obtained by-the-book-properly, because the source is tainted or compromised, or even because it might have been manufactured out of whole cloth. The rules of evidence in matters of justice do vary-sometimes they reflect a traditional and independent legality which stands with scrupulously blind eye. sometimes they reflect nothing but politics and dominance in blatant disregard of any real legality. (In a political trial the judgers may even operate on the effectual premise that to be ignored is any evidence nor tainted, coerced, or invented.) In any case rules of evidencefor courts ark different from rules of evidence for historians. A court wishes to determine guilt or innocence: a historian may or may not care about this, but if he does he is not so limited as a court-any court-in considering what evidences and factors are relevant. And he may be looking for a "whole truth" beyond the bounds of an indictment. Ultimately, he should want to know "what happened," not just "who is guilty." In answering the one it is sometimes possible to answer the other: not always. There are causes for every- thing, but there is not always "guilt." The historian looks beyond the lawyer and judge-and sometimes he looks at them. It can be a searching look, especially when themy and all that he must get his hands on in order to find-out "what happened" includes unsubstantiated, coerced, doctored, or otherwise specious evidence from the records of political trials. This evidence will indeed be considered, but perhaps in a different light than that which its generators intended. Yes, even the kind of trial justice that hops and punches can be useful to the historian; reaching into its pouch he might withdraw many interesting things. He might do what no lawyer can do: judge the judges. Time and the record allow this to happen. Unfortunate and despicable as were the trials of the Germans from the standpoints of traditional Western justice and humanity, their records and their verdicts nonethe- less do help us to determine the history of an epoch. But this is true in spite of. not because of, the bold and foolish announcements by their conveners that a large part of the purpose of the trials was to establish a historical, not just legal. verdict-and one meant to stand for all time. By looking carefully at the verdicts of these trials and at the evidence used to secure them, we gain at the very least an idea of the temper and methods of the times. Far more important, we can also draw a critical eye on the very issues the trials were meant to "settle." Have they been settled? In our lead article this issue we look at one case. William B. Lindsey's examination of the trial of Dr. Bruno Tesch is a milestone in revisionism as it relates to war crimes trials. Whereas cases in the famous IMT and NMT trials at Nuremberg have received abundant attention, the lesser-known series of British Military Tribunals which were convened with summary haste right after the war have not been so well plumbed. Because in many cases these were trials of technical specialists, not political or military figures, historians might have hesitated to delve into areas that would require technical competence in their details. Especially so revisionist historians. who have always believed in getting down to detail. It is no surprise, then, that the first critical study of the great Zyklon B trial-"evidence" from which has been and is one of the prime props of the devolved "Holocaust" legend- continued on p. 384 Zyklon B, Auschwitz, and the Trial of Dr. Bruno Tesch WILLIAM B. LINDSEY We still have judgement here, that we but teach Bloody instruc- tions, which being taught return To plague th'inventor. This even handed justice Commends th'ingredience of our poison'd chalice To our own lips. -Shakespeare, Macbeth The Prelude to "Justice" Toward the end of World War 11, the designated legal repre- sentatives of the United Nations,' meeting in London with Lord Wright, Chairman of the United Nations War Crimes Commission, established the London Agreements to implement earlier agree- ments by the United Nations at Yalta and other war conferences, and to finally concretize numerous threats and warnings made by the United Nations to the Axis nations during the course of the war. Their intention was to impeach, prosecute and punish the vanquished Germans and Japanese for crimes newly defined and delineated by the victors themselves, and to do this with tribunals created by them for that single purpose.
Recommended publications
  • HOLOCAUST DENIAL* Denial of the Truth of the Holocaust Comes in Three Modes. One Mode Is Seldom Recognized: Bracketing the SHOAH with Other Mass Murders in History

    HOLOCAUST DENIAL* Denial of the Truth of the Holocaust Comes in Three Modes. One Mode Is Seldom Recognized: Bracketing the SHOAH with Other Mass Murders in History

    HOLOCAUST DENIAL* Denial of the truth of the Holocaust comes in three modes. One mode is seldom recognized: bracketing the SHOAH with other mass murders in history. This mode of generalization flattens out the specificity and denies the uniqueness of the Holocaust. Unpleasant ethical, moral and theological issues are thereby stifled. The Holocaust is swallowed up in the mighty river of wickedness and mass murder that has characterized human history since the mind of man runneth not to the contrary. From the balcony - a perch often preferred by the privileged and/or educated - all violence down there seems remote. A second mode of denial is. encountered as an expression of Jewish preciousness. More or less bluntly, the position is taken that the Holocaust cannot be understood by a person who is not a Jew. This is a very dangerous posture, for by it the gentile - whether perpetrator or spectator - is home free. Why should he accept responsibility for an action whose significance, he is assured by the victims, is outside his universe of discourse? The third mode of denial, in nature and expression more often in the public view, is intellectually less interesting. Like the thought world of its purveyers, it is marked by banality. What interest does a thinking person have in debating whether or not the earth is flat? Nevertheless, the third mode of denial is alive and well. In large areas dominated by Christian, Jewish or Muslim fundamentalism, the facts are denied. In pristine condition, none of the three great monotheistic religions has need to deny the *by Franklin H.
  • Anton Maegerle Die Iranische Rechtsextremisten-Connection

    Anton Maegerle Die Iranische Rechtsextremisten-Connection

    www.doew.at Anton Maegerle Die iranische Rechtsextremisten-Connection Ersterschienen im Vierteljahresheft Tribüne. Zeitschrift zum Verständnis des Judentums (Frankfurt am Main). 2. Quartal 2006, Heft 178. Hier: ergänzte Fassung. Irans Staatspräsident Mahmud Ahmadinedschad hat seit seinem Amtsantritt im August 2005 in Verbalattacken wiederholt den Holocaust bezweifelt und Israel als „Krebsgeschwür“ bezeichnet. Ahmadinedschad und führende Re- präsentanten des Gottesstaates haben mehrfach angekündigt eine so genannte „Holocaust-Untersuchung“ abhalten zu wollen. „Es ist das erste Mal in der Geschichte der Holocaust-Weltpolitik, daß eine ganze Regierung den jüdischen Holocaust einer freien wissenschaftlichen Prüfung, unterzieht“ – jubilierte die in rechtsextremen Kreisen einflussreiche antisemitische HetzpostillePhoenix .1 Als „Holocaust-Experten“ sind die Namen von einschlägigen Holocaustleug- nern im Gespräch. Irans Außenminister Manuchehr Mottaki bezeichnete im Februar 2006 das Urteil gegen den britischen Holocaustleugner David Irving (Jg. 1938) als „westliches Paradox“. Der Westen fordere Meinungsfreiheit, praktiziere aber das Gegenteil. „Wir verstehen nicht, warum der Westen so verzweifelt darauf besteht, dieses Verbrechen begangen und genau sechs Mil- lionen getötet zu haben“, sagte Mottaki.2 Irving war zuvor vom Wiener Straf- landesgericht zu einer dreijährigen Haftstrafe wegen nationalsozialistischer Wiederbetätigung verurteilt worden. Weithin unbekannt ist die Tatsache, dass Rechtsextremisten seit dem Sieg der Islamischen Revolution 1979 enge Kontakte zum Iran pflegen. Gemeinsam sind den religiösen Fundamentalisten im Iran und den Rechtsextremisten unter- schiedlichster Couleur Feindbilder wie Antiliberalismus, Antiamerikanismus, Antisemitismus und Antizionismus. Islamisten und Rechtsextremisten pflegen ein ausgeprägtes Freund-Feind-Denken, propagieren die Ideologie der Un- gleichheit und lehnen die universalistische Geltung der Menschenrechte und Menschenwürde ab. 1 Phoenix 1/2006, S. 19. 2 Zit. nach Huber, Markus: Justizias Goldwaage, in: Tagesspiegel, 22.
  • Rechtsextremismus Und Antifaschismus Herausgegeben Von Klaus Kinner Und Rolf Richter

    Rechtsextremismus Und Antifaschismus Herausgegeben Von Klaus Kinner Und Rolf Richter

    Rechtsextremismus und Antifaschismus herausgegeben von Klaus Kinner und Rolf Richter 1 Schriften 5 herausgegeben von der Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung Sachsen e. V. und der Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung, Gesellschaftsanalyse und Politische Bildung e. V. 2 Rechtsextremismus und Antifaschismus Historische und aktuelle Dimensionen herausgegeben von Klaus Kinner und Rolf Richter Karl Dietz Verlag Berlin 3 Die Deutsche Bibliothek – CIP-Einheitsaufnahme Rechtsextremismus und Antifaschismus : historische und aktuelle Dimensionen / hrsg. von Klaus Kinner und Rolf Richter. – Berlin : Dietz, 2000 (Schriften / Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung ; Bd. 5) ISBN 3-320-02015-3 © Karl Dietz Verlag Berlin GmbH 2000 Umschlag: Egbert Neubauer, MediaService Fotos: Gabriele Senft, Berlin Typografie: Brigitte Bachmann Satz: MediaService, Berlin Druck und Bindearbeit: BärenDruck, Berlin Printed in Germany 4 INHALT Editorial 7 WERNER BRAMKE Antifaschistische Tradition und aktueller Antifaschismus 8 ROLF RICHTER Über Theoretisches und Praktisches im heutigen Antifaschismus 14 KLAUS KINNER Kommunistischer Antifaschismus – ein schwieriges Erbe 45 ANDRÉ HAHN Zum Umgang mit Rechtsextremen in den Parlamenten 52 NORBERT MADLOCH Rechtsextremismus in Deutschland nach dem Ende des Hitlerfaschismus 57 Vorbemerkung 58 Rechtsextremistische Tendenzen und Entwicklungen in der DDR, speziell in Sachsen, bis Oktober 1990 63 Hauptetappen der Entwicklung des Rechtsextremismus in den alten Bundesländern bis zur deutschen Vereinigung 1990 106 Zur Entwicklung des Rechtsextremismus im geeinten Deutschland 1990 bis 1990 – besonders in den neuen Bundesländern 146 Ursachen und Perspektiven des Rechtsextremismus in der Bundesrepublik 206 ROLAND BACH Zur nationalen und sozialen Demagogie der extremen Rechten 215 5 Anhang 251 NORBERT MADLOCH Lexikalische Erläuterungen zu den im Rechtsextremismus-Teil verwandten Hauptbegriffen 252 Rechtsextremismus 253 Rechtsradikalismus = Grauzone 255 Rechtspopulismus 256 Faschismus/Nazismus – Neofaschismus/Neonazismus 257 Neue Rechte 261 Rassismus 264 Ausländer- bzw.
  • Dreaming of a National Socialist World: the World Union of National Socialists (Wuns) and the Recurring Vision of Transnational Neo-Nazism

    Dreaming of a National Socialist World: the World Union of National Socialists (Wuns) and the Recurring Vision of Transnational Neo-Nazism

    fascism 8 (2019) 275-306 brill.com/fasc Dreaming of a National Socialist World: The World Union of National Socialists (wuns) and the Recurring Vision of Transnational Neo-Nazism Paul Jackson Senior Lecturer in History, University of Northampton [email protected] Abstract This article will survey the transnational dynamics of the World Union of National Socialists (wuns), from its foundation in 1962 to the present day. It will examine a wide range of materials generated by the organisation, including its foundational docu- ment, the Cotswolds Declaration, as well as membership application details, wuns bulletins, related magazines such as Stormtrooper, and its intellectual journals, Nation- al Socialist World and The National Socialist. By analysing material from affiliated organisations, it will also consider how the network was able to foster contrasting rela- tionships with sympathetic groups in Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Europe, al- lowing other leading neo-Nazis, such as Colin Jordan, to develop a wider role interna- tionally. The author argues that the neo-Nazi network reached its height in the mid to late 1960s, and also highlights how, in more recent times, the wuns has taken on a new role as an evocative ‘story’ in neo-Nazi history. This process of ‘accumulative extrem- ism’, inventing a new tradition within the neo-Nazi movement, is important to recog- nise, as it helps us understand the self-mythologizing nature of neo-Nazi and wider neo-fascist cultures. Therefore, despite failing in its ambitions of creating a Nazi- inspired new global order, the lasting significance of the wuns has been its ability to inspire newer transnational aspirations among neo-Nazis and neo-fascists.
  • Rechtsextremismus in Stichworten

    Rechtsextremismus in Stichworten

    Rechtsextremismus in Stichworten Ideologien - Organisationen - Aktivitäten Herausgeber: Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg Behörde für Inneres Landesamt für Verfassungsschutz Johanniswall 4, 20095 Hamburg Telefon: 040/244443 Telefax: 040/338360 Internet-Homepage: http://www.hamburg.de/Behoerden/LfV/homepage.htm Auflage: 4000 Juni 2001 Druck: Lütcke & Wulff, Heidenkampsweg 76 B, 20097 Hamburg 2 Vorwort Die von rechtsextremistischen Bestrebungen ausgehenden Gefahren für die freiheitliche demokratische Grundordnung und für das friedliche Zu- sammenleben der Menschen sind gerade in jüngster Zeit besonders deutlich und damit auch Gegenstand tief besorgter und intensiver öf- fentlicher Diskussion geworden. Die Zahl rechtsextremistisch motivierter Straftaten ist im vergangenen Jahr drastisch gestiegen, eine Vielzahl von Aufmärschen und anderen Aktivitäten vor allem von neonazisti- schen Gruppierungen haben Erschrecken, Empörung und Protest hervor- gerufen. Auch eine weltoffene und liberale Stadt wie Hamburg ist gegen rechtsextremistisches Treiben offensichtlich nicht gefeit, sie muss sich damit auseinandersetzen und ihm energisch entgegentreten. Zwar ist der Staat bei der Bekämpfung des Rechtsextremismus in einer besonderen Pflicht - er hat die ihm zur Verfügung stehenden Möglichkei- ten von Repression und Prävention auszuschöpfen -, sein Handeln kann jedoch nur dann nachhaltige Erfolge haben, wenn es von einer breiten gesellschaftlichen Unterstützung getragen wird. Rechtsextremisten ha- ben nur dort eine Chance, wo es an demokratischem Engagement fehlt. Organisations- und Versammlungsverbote, die Verfolgung von Strafta- ten und die Beschlagnahme hasserfüllter CDs, Gefährderansprachen und Aussteigerprogramme sind notwendige Maßnahmen, um die Aktions- räume von Neonazis einzugrenzen. Dass ihre menschenverachtenden Pa- rolen nicht wieder verfangen und zumal junge Menschen verführen, be- darf darüber hinaus umfassender gesellschaftlicher Anstrengungen. Hier- für gibt es auch in Hamburg viele gute Beispiele. Wer sich engagieren will, braucht Informationen.
  • Metapedia 22/12/09 10:47

    Metapedia 22/12/09 10:47

    Revisionismus (Holocaust) - Metapedia 22/12/09 10:47 Revisionismus (Holocaust) Aus Metapedia Unter Revisionismus versteht man allgemein den Versuch, geschichtliche Aufzeichnungen zu korrigieren angesichts besserer historischer Beweise, einer ruhigeren politischen Atmosphäre und einer objektiveren Einstellung.[1] Als Holocaust-Revisionismus (oft verkürzt „Revisionismus“ genannt) bezeichnet man den Versuch, die Tatsachenbehauptung des sogenannten Holocaust, d.i. die systematische Vernichtung von ca. sechs Millionen Juden während des Zweiten Weltkrieges, grundsätzlich zu hinterfragen oder in wesentlichen Punkten zu korrigieren. Von den Gegnern wird hingegen das Kompositum Holocaustleugnung verwendet, um diese Positionen Englische Karikatur über den „Holocaust-Mythos” von vornherein unglaubwürdig erscheinen zu lassen. Der Begriff unterstellt, daß die Anzweifelnden wider besseres Wissen „leugnen“, also bewusst die Unwahrheit sagen. Obwohl „Leugnung“ nicht mit „Verharmlosung“ gleichgesetzt werden kann, wird der Begriff oft auch auf sogenannte „Verharmlosungen“ und „Relativierungen“ angewendet. Versuche, den Holocaust als Tatsachenbehauptung in Frage zu stellen, werden von den meisten etablierten Historikern abgelehnt, einer Auseinandersetzung mit Vertretern der Gegenposition wird zugleich aus dem Weg gegangen. Der deutsche Historiker Ernst Nolte vertrat hingegen die Ansicht, die Argumente als diskutable und wissenschaftlich redliche Ansichten zu erörtern.[2] In der Bundesrepublik Deutschland wird die öffentliche Holocaustbezweiflung nach § 130
  • Complicity with International Core Crimes and Business Dealings

    Complicity with International Core Crimes and Business Dealings

    Complicity in international criminal law: A fragmented law in need of a new approach By Patrick Lamarre A thesis submitted to the Graduate Program in Law in conformity with the requirements for the Degree of Master of Laws Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada September, 2015 Copyright © Patrick Lamarre, 2015 Abstract Since the advent of the concept of complicity in international crimes in the years following the end of World War 2, the international jurisprudence has had difficulties in conclusively establishing the content of this concept. To that effect, the ICTY, ICTR, SCSL, STL, and the ICC’s jurisprudence contain complicated, unresolved issues that need to be addressed in order to safeguard coherence in ICL. An example of the results of these issues is the discrepancy between the outcome in the cases of Charles Taylor and of Momcilo Perisic where, for essentially the same conduct, the former was convicted and sentenced to 50 years in prison while the latter was acquitted of all charges. In the current situation of on-going legitimacy deficit of international criminal law, this problem must be tackled efficiently. To do so, in this paper, I identified the issues of complicity in ICL and tried to find solutions for them through a proposed definition of the concept of complicity which could be incorporated in the statutes of international criminal tribunals or in the international jurisprudence. According to my proposition, an aid, assistance, or support that has a substantial effect on the commission of the crime by the perpetrator given while the accomplice knew or was wilfully blind that the crime was being committed or that the perpetrator wanted to commit the crime and that, in the normal course of events, it was almost inevitable that the crime would be committed would be the new legal standard for complicity in ICL.
  • Sanctorum Communio Was That Form of Sociality

    Sanctorum Communio Was That Form of Sociality

    Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s Spatially Structured Ecclesiology Reconfiguring the Confession of Christ’s Presence Donald M. Fergus A Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy for the University of Otago, Dunedin September 2011 I would make the same wager that Bonhoeffer, for whom things were so discontinuous and chopped up and whose theological life extended through the unbelievably quick changes in Germany between 1906 and 1945, ‘from idealism to the democracy of the masses,’ as Karl Kupisch has put it, had only one concern: to hold onto the world around him, since God is found in the concrete. André Dumas, Dietrich Bonhoeffer. Theologian of Reality, 16 We have come to know that building up the church of Jesus Christ is the only task which has significance. In it we can find ultimate meaning. We are not looking for that thing which may happen next week, next month, or next year. We believe ourselves to be engaged this very moment in that which is the hope of the world. Our commitment is to the Lord of that redemptive community which has the task of pushing back the boundaries until it holds the world. There will be no peace or healing in our day unless little islands of koinonia can spring up everywhere – islands where Christ is, and because he is we can learn to live in a new way. Elizabeth O’Connor, Call to Commitment. The Story of the Church of the Saviour, Washington DC, 40 ii Abstract Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s Spatially Structured Ecclesiology. Reconfiguring the Confession of Christ’s Presence From the beginning of his career Dietrich Bonhoeffer was invested in describing and then crafting a form of religious community that provided a way of being human, and a form of corporate sociality that was grounded in and grew out of the presence of the person of Jesus Christ.
  • Pedlars of Hate: the Violent Impact of the European Far Right

    Pedlars of Hate: the Violent Impact of the European Far Right

    Pedlars of hate: the violent impact of the European far Right Liz Fekete Published by the Institute of Race Relations 2-6 Leeke Street London WC1X 9HS Tel: +44 (0) 20 7837 0041 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7278 0623 Web: www.irr.org.uk Email: [email protected] ©Institute of Race Relations 2012 ISBN 978-0-85001-071-9 Acknowledgements We would like to acknowledge the support of the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust and the Open Society Foundations in the researching, production and dissemination of this report. Many of the articles cited in this document have been translated into English by over twenty volunteers who assist the IRR’s European Research Programme. We would especially like to thank Sibille Merz and Dagmar Schatz (who translate from German into English), Joanna Tegnerowicz (who translates from Polish into English) and Kate Harre, Frances Webber and Norberto Laguía Casaus (who translate from Spanish into English). A particular debt is due to Frank Kopperschläger and Andrei Stavila for their generosity in allowing us to use their photographs. In compiling this report the websites of the Internet Centre Against Racism in Europe (www.icare.to) and Romea (www.romea.cz) proved invaluable. Liz Fekete is Executive Director of the Institute of Race Relations and head of its European research programme. Cover photo by Frank Kopperschläger is of the ‘Silence Against Silence’ memorial rally in Berlin on 26 November 2011 to commemorate the victims of the National Socialist Underground. (In Germany, white roses symbolise the resistance movement to the Nazi
  • Informe 2010

    Informe 2010

    INFORME SOBRE EL ANTISEMITISMO EN ESPAÑA DURANTE EL AÑO 2010 REPORT ON ANTI-SEMITISM IN SPAIN IN 2010 http://observatorioantisemitismo.fcje.org Informe sobre el Antisemitismo en España durante el año 2010 Report on Anti-Semitism in Spain in 2010 Madrid, Marzo 2011 Informe basado en la información publicada en el Observatorio de Antisemitismo http://observatorioantisemitismo.fcje.org y en los cuadernos de Análisis sobre Antisemitismo editados por el Movimiento contra la Intolerancia. Report based on information published by Observatory on Anti-Semitism in Spain, http://observatorioantisemitismo.fcje.org, and in the journals of Analysis about Anti-Semitism published by the Movimiento contra la Intolerancia (Movement against Intolerance). Report on Anti-Semitism in Spain in 2010 Informe sobre el Antisemitismo en España durante el año 2010 Table of contents: Índice de contenido: 1. Introduction 1. Introducción 2. Registered anti-Semitic acts 2. Actos antisemitas registrados 2.1 Attacks against people 2.1 Ataques contra las personas 2.2 Attacks against property 2.2 Ataques contra la propiedad 2.3 Media 2.3 Medios de comunicación 2.4 Internet 2.4 Internet 2.5 Neo-Nazism 2.5 Neonazismo 2.6 Trivialization of the Holocaust 2.6 Banalización de la Shoá 2.7 Diff usion of anti-Semitic literature 2.7 Difusión de literatura antisemita 2.8 Public institutions and organizations 2.8 Instituciones públicas y organizaciones 3. The fi ght against Anti-Semitism 3. Lucha contra el Antisemitismo 3.1 Legal advances 3.1 Avances jurídicos 3.2 Initiatives carried out in 2010 3.2 Iniciativas realizadas 3.3 Reports and studies 3.3 Informes y estudios 3.4 Report against hate 3.4 Memoria contra el odio Images and complete articles mentioned in this report, can be found at: Se pueden consultar las imágenes y textos citados en este informe en: http://observatorioantisemitismo.fcje.org http://observatorioantisemitismo.fcje.org 1.
  • 1 Crimes of War: Antiquity to the Middle Ages

    1 Crimes of War: Antiquity to the Middle Ages

    Notes 1 Crimes of War: Antiquity to the Middle Ages 1. The Works of Mencius, in James Legge, ed. and trans., The Four Books: The Great Learning, Confucian Analects, the Doctrine of the Mean, the Works of Mencius (Hong Kong: Hop Kuen Book, 1971), pp. 282–283; see also W. A. P. Martin, “Traces of International Law in Ancient China,” International Review, Vol. 14 (January 1883), p. 69, who, paraphrasing Mencius, said that “the only foundation of national prosperity is justice and charity”; Hauiyu Wang also discusses this subject in “The Way of Heart: Mencius’ Understanding of Justice,” Philosophy East & West, Vol. 59, No. 3 (July 3, 2009), pp. 317–363. 2. Wilhelm G. Grewe, The Epochs of International Law, trans. and rev. Michael Byers (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2000), p. 7. 3. Lassa Oppenheimer, International Law: A Treatise, ed. Arnold D. McNair, Vol. 1 (New York: Longmans, Green, 1905), pp. 4–5. 4. Eric Yong-Joong Lee, “Early Development of Modern International Law in East Asia—With Special Reference to China, Japan and Korea,” Journal of the History of International Law, Vol. 4 (2002), p. 42. 5. Robert Cryer, Prosecuting International Crimes: Selectivity and the International Criminal Law Regime (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), pp. 25–31. 6. R. P. Anand, “Universality of International Law: An Asian Perspective,” Essays in International Law, No. 23 (2007), pp. 23, 38. 7. Michael Howard, “Constraints on Warfare,” in Michael Howard, George J. Andreopoulos, and Mark R. Shulman, eds., The Laws of War: Constraints on Warfare in the Western World (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994), p.
  • Complicity of German Industrialists in the Murder of Interned Allied Civilians by Means of Poison Gas

    Complicity of German Industrialists in the Murder of Interned Allied Civilians by Means of Poison Gas

    CASE No. 9 THE ZYKLON B, CASE TRIAL OF BRUNO TESCH AND TWO OTHERS BRITISH MILITARY COURT, HAMBURG, 1ST-8TH M A R C H , 1 9 4 6 Complicity of German industrialists in the murder of interned allied civilians by means of poison gas. The Court The Charge The Case for the Prosecution The Evidence for the Prosecution The Opening Statements of Defence Counsel Counsel for Tesch Counsel for Weinbacher Counsel for Drosihn The Evidence for the Defence Dr. Tesch Karl Weinbacher Dr. Drosihn The Remaining Defence Witnesses The Closing Addresses of the Defence Counsel Counsel for Tesch Counsel for Weinbacher Counsel for Drosihn The Prosecutor's Closing Address The Summing up of the Judge Advocate The Verdict The Sentence Notes on the Case A Question of Jurisdiction: The Nationality of the Victims Questions of Substantive Law The Crime Alleged Civilians as War Criminals PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/10c581/ Bruno Tesch was owner of a firm which arranged for the supply of poison gas intended for the extermination of vermin, and among the customers of the firm were the S.S. Karl Weinbacher was Tesch’s Procurist or second-in-command. Joachim Drosihn was the firm’s fist gassing technician. These three were accused of having supplied poison gas used for killing allied nationals interned in concentration camps, knowing that it was so to be used. The Defence claimed that the accused did not know of the use to which the gas was to be put ; for Drosihn it was also pleaded that the supply of gas was beyond his control.