Annual Report 1.1.2016–30.9.2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annual Report 1.1.2016–30.9.2017 UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ, UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI AND UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH Annual Report 1.1.2016–30.9.2017 Contents 1 FOREWORDS ............................................................................................................................................. 4 2 RESEARCH OUTPUT IN NUMBERS AND HIGHLIGHTS IN 2016–2017 ........................................................... 5 3 RESEARCH PROJECTS .............................................................................................................................. 8 3.1 Genomics of insect societies – phenotypic plasticity and metagenomics ............................................ 8 3.2 Social evolution and host-parasite interactions – interactions at the level of genes and individuals ....... 9 3.3 Dispersal and inbreeding in fragmented landscapes ....................................................................... 10 3.4 SpecIAnt: Speciation in ants ........................................................................................................ 11 3.5 Microbiome of social insects ........................................................................................................ 12 3.6 Predator-prey interactions and maintance of color polymorphism .................................................... 13 3.7 Social environments and the coevolution of predators and prey ...................................................... 14 3.8 Kinship effects on birch seedling behavior ..................................................................................... 15 3.9 Evolution of conflict and cooperation in human groups ................................................................... 16 3.10 Evolutionary theory of social interactions ....................................................................................... 17 3.11 Spatial population genetics .......................................................................................................... 18 3.12 Evolution of virulence and host-pathogen interactions .................................................................... 19 3.13 Modelling the ecology and evolution of environmentally growing pathogens ..................................... 20 3.14 Sexual reproduction: how much, when, why, and with whom? ......................................................... 21 3.15 Antibiotic resistance: understanding the problem in an attempt to find potential solutions ................... 22 3.16 PrimeBEE: Developing an edible vaccination against microbial diseases in honey bees .................... 23 3.17 Long-term consequences of climate change .................................................................................. 24 3.18 Invasion towards stressful environments ....................................................................................... 25 4 PERSONNEL ............................................................................................................................................. 26 4.1 Heads of the CoE ....................................................................................................................... 27 4.2 Principal investigators ................................................................................................................. 28 4.3 Researchers............................................................................................................................... 30 4.4 Doctoral students ........................................................................................................................ 34 4.5 Supporting personnel .................................................................................................................. 38 4.6 Alumni 2016–2017 ...................................................................................................................... 39 5 DOCTORAL DEGREES EARNED IN THE CoE ............................................................................................. 43 5.1 2016 .......................................................................................................................................... 43 5.2 2017 .......................................................................................................................................... 50 6 PUBLICATIONS ......................................................................................................................................... 52 6.1 2016 .......................................................................................................................................... 52 6.1.1 Peer-reviewed scientific articles ................................................................................................... 52 6.1.1.1 Journal article ......................................................................................................................... 52 6.1.1.2 Review article ......................................................................................................................... 54 6.1.1.3 Book section, chapters in research books ................................................................................. 54 6.1.2 Theses ...................................................................................................................................... 55 1 6.1.2.1 Bachelor’s thesis .................................................................................................................... 55 6.1.2.2 Master’s thesis ....................................................................................................................... 55 6.2 2017 .......................................................................................................................................... 55 6.2.1 Peer-reviewed scientific articles ................................................................................................... 55 6.2.1.1 Journal article ......................................................................................................................... 55 6.2.1.2 Review article ......................................................................................................................... 58 6.2.1.3 Book section, chapters in research books ................................................................................. 58 6.2.2 Non-refereed scientific articles ..................................................................................................... 59 6.2.2.1 Non-refereed scientific articles ................................................................................................. 59 6.2.2.2 Book section .......................................................................................................................... 59 6.2.3 Publications intended for the general public ................................................................................... 59 6.2.3.1 Popularised article, newspaper article ....................................................................................... 59 6.2.4 Theses ...................................................................................................................................... 60 6.2.4.1 Bachelor’s thesis .................................................................................................................... 60 6.2.4.2 Master’s thesis ....................................................................................................................... 60 7 PATENTS AND INVENTION DISCLOSURES ............................................................................................... 60 7.1 2016 .......................................................................................................................................... 60 7.1.1 Patent notifications ..................................................................................................................... 60 7.2 2017 .......................................................................................................................................... 60 7.2.1 Invention disclosure .................................................................................................................... 60 8 PRESENTATIONS IN SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCES AND WORKSHOPS ...................................................... 60 8.1 2016 .......................................................................................................................................... 60 8.1.1 Oral presentations ...................................................................................................................... 60 8.1.2 Invited oral presentations ............................................................................................................. 62 8.1.3 Posters ...................................................................................................................................... 63 8.2 2017 .......................................................................................................................................... 64 8.2.1 Oral presentations ...................................................................................................................... 64 8.2.2 Invited oral presentations ............................................................................................................. 65 8.2.3 Posters ...................................................................................................................................... 67 9 COMMUNICATION TO OTHER THAN THE SCIENTIFIC
Recommended publications
  • Karl Jordan: a Life in Systematics
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF Kristin Renee Johnson for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History of SciencePresented on July 21, 2003. Title: Karl Jordan: A Life in Systematics Abstract approved: Paul Lawrence Farber Karl Jordan (1861-1959) was an extraordinarily productive entomologist who influenced the development of systematics, entomology, and naturalists' theoretical framework as well as their practice. He has been a figure in existing accounts of the naturalist tradition between 1890 and 1940 that have defended the relative contribution of naturalists to the modem evolutionary synthesis. These accounts, while useful, have primarily examined the natural history of the period in view of how it led to developments in the 193 Os and 40s, removing pre-Synthesis naturalists like Jordan from their research programs, institutional contexts, and disciplinary homes, for the sake of synthesis narratives. This dissertation redresses this picture by examining a naturalist, who, although often cited as important in the synthesis, is more accurately viewed as a man working on the problems of an earlier period. This study examines the specific problems that concerned Jordan, as well as the dynamic institutional, international, theoretical and methodological context of entomology and natural history during his lifetime. It focuses upon how the context in which natural history has been done changed greatly during Jordan's life time, and discusses the role of these changes in both placing naturalists on the defensive among an array of new disciplines and attitudes in science, and providing them with new tools and justifications for doing natural history. One of the primary intents of this study is to demonstrate the many different motives and conditions through which naturalists came to and worked in natural history.
    [Show full text]
  • How Does a Strip of Clearing Affect the Forest Community of Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)?
    Fragmenta Faunistica 52 (2): 125-141, 2009 PL ISSN 0015-9301 O MUSEUM AND INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY PAS How does a strip of clearing affect the forest community of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)? Hanna B a b ik *, Wojciech CZECHOWSKI*, Tomasz WŁODARCZYK** and Maria STERZYŃSKA* * Museum and Institute of Zoology PAS, Laboratory of Social and Myrmecophilous Insects, Wilcza St 64, 00-679 Warszawa, Poland; e-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] **University o f Białystok, Department o f Invertebrate Zoology, Świerkowa St 20B, 15-950 Białystok, Poland; e-mail: t. wlodar@uwb. edu.pl Abstract: Tlie species composition, nest density, structure and ecological profile of an ant community were studied within a transect encompassing the forest interior, forest edge and a belt-shaped clearing in a moist mixed pine forest habitat (Querco roboris-Pinetum) in the Kampinos Forest (Central Poland) in the context of direct and indirect human impact and the bioindicator importance of ants. Altogether, 19 ant species were found; the most abundant ones (in respect of number of nests) in the entire habitat under study were Temnothorax crassispinus (Karav.) and Myrmica rubra (L.). All analysed parameters of individual subcommunities, except for nest density (highest on the forest edge, lowest in the cleared belt), showed a gradient pattern of variability, with species richness and the index of general diversity increasing and the dominance index decreasing within the transect from the forest interior to the cleared belt. Differences between the two subcommunities from the forested area (forest interior and forest edge), both highly dominated by T.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of a Raised Bog and Adjacent Forest in Lithuania
    Eur. J. Entomol. 101: 63–67, 2004 ISSN 1210-5759 Lepidoptera of a raised bog and adjacent forest in Lithuania DALIUS DAPKUS Department of Zoology, Vilnius Pedagogical University, Studentų 39, LT–2004 Vilnius, Lithuania; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Lepidoptera, tyrphobiontic and tyrphophilous species, communities, raised bog, wet forest, Lithuania Abstract. Studies on nocturnal Lepidoptera were carried out on the Laukėnai raised bog and the adjacent wet forest in 2001. Species composition and abundance were evaluated and compared. The species richness was much higher in the forest than at the bog. The core of each lepidopteran community was composed of 22 species with an abundance of higher than 1.0% of the total catch. Tyrpho- philous Hypenodes humidalis (22.0% of all individuals) and Nola aerugula (13.0%) were the dominant species in the raised bog community, while tyrphoneutral Pelosia muscerda (13.6%) and Eilema griseola (8.3%) were the most abundant species at the forest site. Five tyrphobiotic and nine tyrphophilous species made up 43.4% of the total catch on the bog, and three and seven species, respectively, at the forest site, where they made up 9.2% of all individuals. 59% of lepidopteran species recorded on the bog and 36% at the forest site were represented by less than five individuals. The species compositions of these communities showed a weak similarity. Habitat preferences of the tyrphobiontic and tyrphophilous species and dispersal of some of the species between the habi- tats are discussed. INTRODUCTION (1996). Ecological terminology is that of Mikkola & Spitzer (1983), Spitzer & Jaroš (1993), Spitzer (1994): tyrphobiontic The insect fauna of isolated raised bogs in Europe is species are species that are strongly associated with peat bogs, unique in having a considerable portion of relict boreal while tyrphophilous taxa are more abundant on bogs than in and subarctic species (Mikkola & Spitzer, 1983; Spitzer adjacent habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Tenth Forum Herbulot 2018. Integrative Taxonomy, a Multidisciplinary Approach to Answer Compli- Cated Taxonomic Questions
    SPIXIANA 42 2 291-320 München, Dezember 2019 ISSN 0341-8391 Proceedings of the tenth FORUM HERBULOT 2018. Integrative taxonomy, a multidisciplinary approach to answer compli- cated taxonomic questions (Stuttgart, Germany, 11-16 June 2018) Axel Hausmann & Hossein Rajaei (eds) Hausmann, A. & Rajaei, H. (eds) 2019. Proceedings of the tenth FORUM HERBULOT 2018. Integrative taxonomy, a multidisciplinary approach to answer complicated taxonomic questions (Stuttgart, Germany, 11-16 June 2018). Spixiana 42 (2): 291- 320. The tenth International Congress of FORUM HERBULOT on “Integrative taxonomy, a multidisciplinary approach to answer complicated taxonomic questions” took place in the Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart (SMNS), from 11.- 16.06.2018, with 77 participants and 52 scientific presentations. The proceedings provide short information on the meeting and the abstracts of the oral presenta- tions. Axel Hausmann (corresponding author), SNSB – ZSM, Bavarian State Collection of Zoology, Münchhausenstr. 21, 81247 Munich, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] Short report and results Axel Hausmann & Hossein Rajaei Hausmann, A. & Rajaei, H. 2019. Short report and results. Pp. 291-292 in: Hausmann, A. & Rajaei, H. (eds). Proceedings of the tenth FORUM HERBULOT 2018. Integrative taxonomy, a multidisciplinary approach to answer complicated taxonomic questions (Stuttgart, Germany, 11-16 June 2018). Spixiana 42 (2). Axel Hausmann (corresponding author), SNSB – ZSM, Bavarian State Collection of Zoology, Münchhausenstr. 21, 81247 Mu- nich, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] The meeting was organized by an organization The conference started with a lecture on the ground- team of the ‘Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde breaking effects of “Willi Hennig and the synthesis of Stuttgart’ (SMNS).
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Entomology in Brief
    Medical Entomology in Brief Dr. Alfatih Saifudinn Aljafari Assistant professor of Parasitology College of Medicine- Al Jouf University Aim and objectives • Aim: – To bring attention to medical entomology as important biomedical science • Objective: – By the end of this presentation, audience could be able to: • Understand the scope of Medical Entomology • Know medically important arthropods • Understand the basic of pathogen transmission dynamic • Medical Entomology in Brief- Dr. Aljafari (CME- January 2019) In this presentation • Introduction • Classification of arthropods • Examples of medical and public health important species • Insect Ethology • Dynamic of disease transmission • Other application of entomology Medical Entomology in Brief- Dr. Aljafari (CME- January 2019) Definition • Entomology: – The branch of zoology concerned with the study of insects. • Medical Entomology: – Branch of Biomedical sciences concerned with “ArthrobodsIn the past the term "insect" was more vague, and historically the definition of entomology included the study of terrestrial animals in other arthropod groups or other phyla, such, as arachnids, myriapods, earthworms, land snails, and slugs. This wider meaning may still be encountered in informal use. • At some 1.3 million described species, insects account for more than two-thirds of all known organisms, date back some 400 million years, and have many kinds of interactions with humans and other forms of life on earth Medical Entomology in Brief- Dr. Aljafari (CME- January 2019) Arthropods and Human • Transmission of infectious agents • Allergy • Injury • Inflammation • Agricultural damage • Termites • Honey • Silk Medical Entomology in Brief- Dr. Aljafari (CME- January 2019) Phylum Arthropods • Hard exoskeleton, segmented bodies, jointed appendages • Nearly one million species identified so far, mostly insects • The exoskeleton, or cuticle, is composed of chitin.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Subgenus Epicterodes of Arichanna (Lepidoptera
    Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology 21 (2018) 501–512 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jape A review of the subgenus Epicterodes of Arichanna (Lepidoptera, T Geometridae, Ennominae), with description of one new species ⁎ Henan Lia,b, Nan Jianga, Rui Chenga, Chuntian Zhangb, Hongxiang Hana, a Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China b College of Life Science, Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang 110034, China ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The subgenus Epicterodes Wehrli, 1933 of Arichanna Moore, 1868 is reviewed. Six species are recognized, of Diagnosis which, A. (E). denticularia sp. nov. is described as new to science from China. One new synonym is established Morphology based on morphological and genetic similarity: A. (E.) flavomacularia Leech, 1897 (=A. (E.) perimelaina Wehrli, New species 1933 syn. nov.). Results of DNA barcoding for Epicterodes are briefly discussed. Diagnoses for all the species are Taxonomy provided and illustrations of adults, genitalia and distribution map are presented. DNA barcoding Introduction species. Sato (1989) also considered that Icterodes and Paricterodes might need to be raised to generic rank in future, since they are very The genus Arichanna was originally established by Moore (1868) on different in male antenna, forewing venation and genitalia. Thus, the the basis of Scotosia plagifera Walker, 1866. Arichanna is a large genus of application of the subgeneric names has been quite confusing in the the tribe Boarmiini (Stüning, 2000; Jiang et al., 2017), which contains different approaches of different researchers: for example, Sato (1993, more than 70 species (Scoble, 1999; Scoble and Hausmann, 2007)in 1994, 1995, 1998) and Stüning (2000) adopted the subgeneric names five subgenera, mainly distributed in Southeast Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Myrmecophily of Maculinea Butterflies in the Carpathian Basin (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae)
    ettudom sz án é y m ológia i r n i é e h K c a s T e r T Myrmecophily of Maculinea butterflies in the Carpathian Basin (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) A Maculinea boglárkalepkék mirmekofíliája a Kárpát- medencében (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) PhD Thesis Tartally András Department of Evolutionary Zoology and Human Biology University of Debrecen Debrecen, 2008. Ezen értekezést a Debreceni Egyetem TTK Biológia Tudományok Doktori Iskola Biodiverzitás programja keretében készítettem a Debreceni Egyetem TTK doktori (PhD) fokozatának elnyerése céljából. Debrecen, 2008.01.07. Tartally András Tanúsítom, hogy Tartally András doktorjelölt 2001-2005 között a fent megnevezett Doktori Iskola Biodiverzitás programjának keretében irányításommal végezte munkáját. Az értekezésben foglalt eredményekhez a jelölt önálló alkotó tevékenységével meghatározóan hozzájárult. Az értekezés elfogadását javaslom. Debrecen, 2008.01.07. Dr. Varga Zoltán egyetemi tanár In memory of my grandparents Table of contents 1. Introduction......................................................................................... 9 1.1. Myrmecophily of Maculinea butterflies........................................................ 9 1.2. Why is it important to know the local host ant species?.............................. 9 1.3. The aim of this study.................................................................................... 10 2. Materials and Methods..................................................................... 11 2.1. Taxonomy and nomenclature.....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Myrmica Karavajevi (Arn.) (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in Poland: a Species Not As Rare As It Is Thought to Be?
    Fragm enta Faunistica 56 (1): 17-24, 2013 PL ISSN 0015-9301 O M useum a n d I n s t i tu t e o f Z o o lo g y PAS Myrmica karavajevi (Arn.) (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in Poland: a species not as rare as it is thought to be? MagdalenaW it e k , HannaB a b ik , Wojciech C z e c h o w s k i and WiesławaC z e c h o w s k a Museum and Institute o f Zoology, Polish Academy o f Sciences, Wilcza 64, 00-679 Warsaw, Poland; e-maiIs: mawitus@yahoo. co. uk, hbabik@miiz. waw.pl, wcz@miiz. waw.pl, w. czechowska@miiz. waw.pl Abstract:The antMyrmica karavajevi is an extremely rarely found and poorly known workerless social parasite of ants of the Myrmica scabrinodis species group. Hereafter detailed information of its previously published findings from four geographical regions in Poland (Bieszczady Mts, Pieniny Mts, Pomeranian Lakeland and Mazovian Lowland) as well as data on three new records from the Roztocze Upland, Lubelska Upland and Krakowsko- Częstochowska Upland is given. The latter suggests higher than hitherto suspected degree of host species infestation by M. karavajevi. Use of M. rugulosa as a host by M. karavajevi is also discussed. Key words: ants, fauna of Poland, inquilines,Myrmica rugulosa, Myrmica scabrinodis, new localities, social parasitism Introduction Myrmica karavajevi (Amoldi, 1930) is a European obligate socially parasitic workerless inquiline of otherMyrmica Latr. species. The parasite queen coexists with the host queen (or queens), and broods of both species are produced in a mixed colony.Myrmica scabrinodis Nyl., M.
    [Show full text]
  • Acarology, the Study of Ticks and Mites
    Acarology, the study of ticks and mites Ecophysiology, the study of the interrelationship between Actinobiology, the study of the effects of radiation upon an organism's physical functioning and its environment living organisms Edaphology, a branch of soil science that studies the Actinology, the study of the effect of light on chemicals influence of soil on life Aerobiology, a branch of biology that studies organic Electrophysiology, the study of the relationship between particles that are transported by the air electric phenomena and bodily processes Aerology, the study of the atmosphere Embryology, the study of embryos Aetiology, the medical study of the causation of disease Entomology, the study of insects Agrobiology, the study of plant nutrition and growth in Enzymology, the study of enzymes relation to soil Epidemiology, the study of the origin and spread of Agrology, the branch of soil science dealing with the diseases production of crops. Ethology, the study of animal behavior Agrostology, the study of grasses Exobiology, the study of life in outer space Algology, the study of algae Exogeology, the study of geology of celestial bodies Allergology, the study of the causes and treatment of Felinology, the study of cats allergies Fetology, the study of the fetus Andrology, the study of male health Formicology, the study of ants Anesthesiology, the study of anesthesia and anesthetics Gastrology or Gastroenterology, the study of the Angiology, the study of the anatomy of blood and lymph stomach and intestines vascular systems Gemology,
    [Show full text]
  • Robert F. Barsky, “Perception, Taxonomy, and Creation in Nabokov” Ameriquests 13.2 (2018)
    Robert F. Barsky, “Perception, Taxonomy, and Creation in Nabokov” AmeriQuests 13.2 (2018). “Perception, Taxonomy, and Creation in Nabokov”, A review article inspired by Stephen H. Blackwell and Kurt Johnson, Fine Lines: Vladimir Nabokov’s Scientific Art. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2016. ISBN 978-0-300-19455-5. 75 color + 94 b/w illustrations. $50.00. Vladimir Nabokov’s corpus of novels, autobiography, essays and interviews offers the reader a seemingly inexhaustible source of knowledge about the creative process, exercised on some of the most sensitive subjects ever explored in literature, including incest, pedophilia, and censorship. As such, serious inquiry into his writings leave readers with the impression that he is testing the very limits of what is sayable, and even thinkable, and that we, through reflection on his insights and approach, become willing -- or perhaps even unwilling -- participants in thought experiments that can, in such texts as Lolita or Ada, make us feel both exhilarated and guilty by association for crimes committed or contemplated by characters and narrators. He is merciless, in this regard, as Marquis de Sade is in Philosophie dans le Boudoir, in that he leads us into monstrous scenarios with elegance, wit, and creative reflection, and then, when the tension or the sheer activity described becomes positively unbearable, he pauses, ruminates, asks us to consider implications and historical precedents. In this respect, there’s overlap between those scenes in Philosophie that demand how unreasonable would be a God who denies us the pleasure that he himself has programmed into our very flesh, and in the Nabokov investigations into the culpability of Humbert Humbert against a backdrop of historical and legal precedents, such as marriage between underage girls and older men, that contextualize the actions of this character-narrator within a very uncomfortable history of matrimony and seduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Dancing on Terra -- with Terror: Disciplines Reframing Terrifying
    Alternative view of segmented documents via Kairos 20th March 2004 | Draft Dancing on Terra -- with Terror Disciplines reframing terrifying relationships -- / -- Introduction Since the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center, the response has been framed in strictly binary logic: " You are either with us, or you are against us". All governments and peoples of the world are urged to engage in the "war against terrorism" -- in defence of the highest values of civilization. The focus of this war, and any response to further attacks, is on how to stop terrorists. Stopping terrorists is framed as a question of capturing any who may be suspect (whatever the evidence), incarcerating them (without trial), or killing them (whether in military action or through covert assassination). The resources devoted to remedy the impoverishment and injustice, which many recognize as a breeding ground for terrorists, have diminished at a rate commensurate with the increase in resources allocated to "security", whether in the form of military equipment, surveillance, or the associated personnel. Very little effort is made, or called for -- by the media, politicians or engaged groups -- to look beyond the immediate action of terrorists to address the conditions that give rise to them. The focus of conceptual and financial resources is on proximate causes of violence and not on the contextual causes which willl continue to ensure that new terrorists emerge. The following explores the possibility that many disciplines, representing the core intellectual achievement of modern civilization, have developed conceptual approaches that reframe the crude simplicity of the current focus on proximate causes of terrifying relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutional Repository - Research Portal Dépôt Institutionnel - Portail De La Recherche
    Institutional Repository - Research Portal Dépôt Institutionnel - Portail de la Recherche University of Namurresearchportal.unamur.be RESEARCH OUTPUTS / RÉSULTATS DE RECHERCHE The topology and drivers of ant-symbiont networks across Europe Parmentier, Thomas; DE LAENDER, Frederik; Bonte, Dries Published in: Biological Reviews DOI: Author(s)10.1111/brv.12634 - Auteur(s) : Publication date: 2020 Document Version PublicationPeer reviewed date version - Date de publication : Link to publication Citation for pulished version (HARVARD): Parmentier, T, DE LAENDER, F & Bonte, D 2020, 'The topology and drivers of ant-symbiont networks across PermanentEurope', Biologicallink - Permalien Reviews, vol. : 95, no. 6. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12634 Rights / License - Licence de droit d’auteur : General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. BibliothèqueDownload date: Universitaire 07. oct.. 2021 Moretus Plantin 1 The topology and drivers of ant–symbiont networks across 2 Europe 3 4 Thomas Parmentier1,2,*, Frederik de Laender2,† and Dries Bonte1,† 5 6 1Terrestrial Ecology Unit (TEREC), Department of Biology, Ghent University, K.L.
    [Show full text]