DOCSLIB.ORG

Launching a New Institution: PACIFIC COUNCIL on INTERNATIONAL POLICY

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Launching A New Institution: PACIFIC COUNCIL ON INTERNATIONAL POLICY 1995-1996 Launching a New Institution: The Pacific Council on International Policy 1995-1996 Established in cooperation with the Council on Foreign Relations, Inc. To the Members of the Pacific Council 1 on International Policy Launching a New Institution 2 Programs and Meetings 15 Visiting Scholars and Fellows Program 24 Board of Directors 25 Corporate sponsors 26 Individual Contributions 27 General and Program Support 29 Membership Policy 30 Membership Roster 31 Staff 36 Pacific Council on International Policy University of Southern California Los Angeles, California 90089-0035 (phone) 213-740-4296 (fax) 213-740-9498 (e-mail) [email protected] To the members of the Pacific Council on International Policy n two years, the Pacific Council on International Policy has moved from a compelling vision to a vigorous and extraordinarily promising organization. We have made rapid progress in Iestablishing a leadership forum which will attract the participation of thoughtful and concerned leaders from throughout the western region of North America and around the entire Pacific Rim. The Pacific Council’s founding and charter members believe that there is a clear and urgent need for an international policy organization rooted in the strengths of the western United States — its leaders, resources and diversity — but which will consistently and creatively look outward to the kinds of relationships that should be developed with our neighbors to the west in the Asia Pacific region and south in Latin America. It is essential to bring together a broad based group of leaders from around the Pacific Rim to consider the challenges that face us all and to make recommendations for policies that would contribute to growth and stability. Robert F. Erburu, chairman of the board In the narrative report on the Pacific Council that follows, Abraham Lowenthal describes the of the Pacific Council, many projects underway, the support and participation that has been enlisted, and the challenges and Hirotaro Higuchi, Pacific Council board our organization faces as it seeks to build and diversify the membership and develop its many pro- member and chairman, gram areas. All of us are grateful to Abe and his talented staff for what they are doing to build a Asahi Breweries, Tokyo vibrant institution. They will be grateful, in turn, if all of us read this account, share our reac- tions and suggestions, and join in building the kind of Council we want. In launching this institution, we have been fortunate to have from the start the support of the University of Southern California and the Council on Foreign Relations of New York. On behalf of the board of directors of the Pacific Council, I want to convey our special thanks to President Steven Sample of USC and Council on Foreign Relations President Leslie H. Gelb and Chairman Pete Peterson. We are also enormously grateful to the foundations, corporations, governments and individuals who are providing the needed financial support, which has made it possible to begin the work of the Pacific Council. The future of the Pacific Council is dependent on the active participation of our membership and the generosity of donors who believe in what we do. I urge you to take every opportunity to join in and support our activities. Robert F. Erburu Chair, Board of Directors 1 Launching a New Institution The Pacific Council on International Policy in 1995-96: Launching a New Institution he Pacific Council on International connected with domestic problems. Policy is an independent and non- Designed and planned during 1994, Tpartisan leadership forum, based the Pacific Council was initiated early in in Los Angeles. It brings together diverse April 1995 when members of an informal leaders — primarily from the western Steering Committee incorporated the region of the United States but also from Council as a non-profit organization; elsewhere in the U.S., Canada and Mexico, constituted a Board of Directors and Pacific Asia, South America and Europe adopted by-laws; applied to the Internal — to exchange ideas and develop policy Revenue Service for 501(c)(3) tax status, recommendations on economic, social and which was soon granted; and invited a political issues with important interna- number of Founding Members to attend an tional dimensions. Inaugural Retreat, held in mid-May 1995. The Pacific Council aims to This report covers the development of inform and improve policy- the Pacific Council from its incorporation making in both the private in April 1995 through the end of Decem- and public sectors, to promote ber 1996. During this period, a relatively public understanding of global short time in the rhythm of institution- trends and their implications, building, the Pacific Council has been and to facilitate international successfully launched. We have attracted cooperation on shared con- an influential and committed Board and a cerns, particularly around the diverse group of members; recruited a Pacific Rim. It is premised on talented and energetic core staff; developed the belief that business, profes- infrastructure and software that will facili- sional and political leaders can- tate communications and exchange around not afford to be parochial when the Pacific Rim; crafted and strengthened borders are ever more perme- significant institutional relationships; able and when trade, finance, initiated a vigorous program of briefings, communications and culture workshops, Study Groups and Retreats; are all so relentlessly global. started a Visiting Fellows program; out- Established in cooperation lined a strategy for communications and with the Council on Foreign outreach; begun to design targeted efforts Abraham F. Lowenthal, to expand the participation of and outreach president of the Pacific Relations of New York and headquartered Council on the campus of the University of to communities not historically well- Southern California, the Pacific Council has represented in foreign policy discussions; nearly six hundred individual members. and adopted a diversified plan for the They include decision-makers in business Council’s medium and longer-term fund- and labor, politics and government, reli- ing. It is too early to be sure that the gion, the media, law, entertainment, sci- Pacific Council will take root and prosper, ence and technology, education and other but it is off to a promising start. professions — all of whom share the con- viction that international developments are increasingly significant and ever more 2 Board and Membership Progress toward these membership goals has been gratifying. As of December he Pacific Council’s Board current- 31, 1996, the Pacific Council has 591 ly includes thirty-four leaders from members, of whom some 80% reside in Tindustry and finance, law, the the western states, and nearly 10% each media and the academic world. In keep- east of the Rockies and ing with the Pacific Council’s regional, in 14 other countries. national and international character, the The Council’s members Board includes members from throughout include business lead- the western region of the United States; ers from many sectors: four members from the Atlantic seaboard; lawyers; accountants; and two international members (from publishers, editors, and Canada and Japan) with two others now journalists; religious being invited. Seven of the Board’s thirty- leaders; labor union two US members are African-American, officials; military Asian-American or Latino, and six are officers; creative artists; women. The Pacific Council’s Board scholars and academic members are committed and active; most administrators; state members serve on Board Committees (on and local government Membership, Finance and Development, officials; and officers of and Studies), or are officers of the Board, many kinds of non-governmental organiza- Linda Griego, Pacific Council board member and many have been attending Pacific tions. The Pacific Council’s members and president of Rebuild Council programs. include 225 from Los Angeles County, 145 LA (RLA), and Vilma S. others from California, and 118 from west- Martinez, partner in At its first meeting, the Board adopted Munson, Tolles & Olson detailed membership policies and proce- ern states other than California. About dures, summarized elsewhere in this report. 20% of the Pacific Council’s current US- The Board set a goal of attracting 1000 based members are female, while nearly members by June 30, 1998; it suggested as many are African-American, Asian- that 75% of that total should be persons American or Latino. resident in the western United States, with Plans for 1997 call for building a the other 25% divided among persons critical mass of Pacific Council members residing east of the Rockies or in other in Northern California and in Seattle to countries. The Board-adopted guidelines permit some programming in these popu- included commitments to seek diversity lation centers; significantly increasing the of professional background and political number of members elsewhere in the west- perspective; to incorporate women and ern states; substantially expanding interna- members of US minority groups which tional membership and participation, traditionally have not participated in for- especially in Canada, Mexico and East eign policy organizations; and to include Asia; reinforcing membership from high- younger people of leadership quality with tech industries, the entertainment and the potential to reach positions of senior other internationally-oriented
Recommended publications
  • The Honorable John F. Kelly January 30, 2017 Secretary Department of Homeland Security 3801 Nebraska Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036

    The Honorable John F. Kelly January 30, 2017 Secretary Department of Homeland Security 3801 Nebraska Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036

    The Honorable John F. Kelly January 30, 2017 Secretary Department of Homeland Security 3801 Nebraska Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036 The Honorable Sally Yates Acting Attorney General Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530 The Honorable Thomas A. Shannon Acting Secretary Department of State 2201 C Street, NW Washington, DC 20520 Secretary Kelly, Acting Attorney General Yates, Acting Secretary Shannon: As former cabinet Secretaries, senior government officials, diplomats, military service members and intelligence community professionals who have served in the Bush and Obama administrations, we, the undersigned, have worked for many years to make America strong and our homeland secure. Therefore, we are writing to you to express our deep concern with President Trump’s recent Executive Order directed at the immigration system, refugees and visitors to this country. This Order not only jeopardizes tens of thousands of lives, it has caused a crisis right here in America and will do long-term damage to our national security. In the middle of the night, just as we were beginning our nation’s commemoration of the Holocaust, dozens of refugees onboard flights to the United States and thousands of visitors were swept up in an Order of unprecedented scope, apparently with little to no oversight or input from national security professionals. Individuals, who have passed through multiple rounds of robust security vetting, including just before their departure, were detained, some reportedly without access to lawyers, right here in U.S. airports. They include not only women and children whose lives have been upended by actual radical terrorists, but brave individuals who put their own lives on the line and worked side-by-side with our men and women in uniform in Iraq now fighting against ISIL.
  • Process Makes Perfect Best Practices in the Art of National Security Policymaking

    Process Makes Perfect Best Practices in the Art of National Security Policymaking

    AP PHOTO/CHARLES DHARAPAK PHOTO/CHARLES AP Process Makes Perfect Best Practices in the Art of National Security Policymaking By Kori Schake, Hoover Institution, and William F. Wechsler, Center for American Progress January 2017 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Process Makes Perfect Best Practices in the Art of National Security Policymaking By Kori Schake, Hoover Institution, and William F. Wechsler, Center for American Progress January 2017 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 6 Findings 14 First-order questions for the next president 17 Best practices to consider 26 Policymaking versus oversight versus crisis management 36 Meetings, meetings, and more meetings 61 Internal NSC staff management 72 Appendix A 73 About the authors 74 Endnotes Introduction and summary Most modern presidents have found that the transition from campaigning to governing presents a unique set of challenges, especially regarding their newfound national security responsibilities. Regardless of their party affiliation or preferred diplomatic priorities, presidents have invariably come to appreciate that they can- not afford to make foreign policy decisions in the same manner as they did when they were a candidate. The requirements of managing an enormous and complex national security bureau- cracy reward careful deliberation and strategic consistency, while sharply punishing the kind of policy shifts that are more common on the campaign trail. Statements by the president are taken far more seriously abroad than are promises by a candidate, by both allies and adversaries alike. And while policy mistakes made before entering office can damage a candidate’s personal political prospects, a serious misstep made once in office can put the country itself at risk.
  • Russia's Many Foreign Policies

    Russia's Many Foreign Policies

    Russia’s Many Foreign Policies MICHAEL MCFAUL hat are Russian foreign policy objectives? It depends on whom you ask. W In making assessments of Russia’s behavior in the world, it is absolutely critical that we recognize that Russia today is not a totalitarian state ruled by a Communist Party with a single and clearly articulated foreign policy of expand- ing world socialism and destroying world capitalism and democracy. That state disappeared in 1991. Rather, Russia is a democratizing state—a weakly institu- tionalized democracy with several deficiencies, but a democratizing state nonetheless. Russia’s foreign policy, in turn, is a product of domestic politics in a pluralistic system. In democracies, “states” do not have foreign policy objectives. Rather, indi- vidual political leaders, parties, and interest groups have foreign policy objec- tives. Under certain conditions, these various forces come together to support a united purpose in foreign affairs. At other times, these disparate groups can have conflicting views about foreign policy objectives. They can even support the same foreign policy objective for different reasons.1 Russia today is no different. Although Russian leaders share in supporting a few common, general foreign policy objectives, they disagree on many others. They also disagree on the means that should be deployed to achieve the same for- eign policy objective. The foreign policy that eventually results is a product of debate, political struggle, electoral politics, and lobbying by key interest groups. Because Russia is undergoing revolutionary change internally, the foreign policy that results from Russian domestic politics can change quickly. This article makes the case for the centrality of domestic politics in the artic- ulation and implementation of Russian foreign policy.
  • Post-Soviet States: People, Power, and Assets Oral History Archive

    Post-Soviet States: People, Power, and Assets Oral History Archive

    Post-Soviet States: People, Power, and Assets Oral History Archive Interviewee: Mark O. Henry Interviewer: Rebecca Adeline Johnston Date: December 9, 2019 Location: Woburn, MA Abstract Mark O. Henry is co-founder and Chief Financial Officer of Boston-based Bach Pharma. An accountant by training, he has worked as a CPA for Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., a vice president at State Street Bank in Boston, and in numerous business ventures. Much of his career in the pharmaceutical industry has been aimed at establishing a market in the United States for Russian therapeutics. Most prominent in his work is a monosodium luminol product marketed as Galavit in Russia and as GVT in the United States. In this interview, Mr. Henry discusses his experiences working with the Russian and American medical communities beginning in the late 1990s and which remain ongoing. This transcript is lightly edited for clarity. Audio for this interview is not available. Redacted portions are marked as such. Interviewer questions and remarks are presented in bold. Interview Transcript I wanted to start with asking a bit about yourself—where you're from, some of the highlights of your very varied and rich career in accounting and business, up to the point where you started working in Russia. I graduated with a bachelor of science degree in accounting, became a CPA for KPMG. One of my first assignments that I ever had was in South America, specifically in Columbia, South America. I was helping United Fruit Company at the time sell bananas to Russia, which was prohibited from the United States because of the 1947 ban on trade with Russia that the Congress of the United States had passed.
  • Suga and Biden Off to a Good Start

    Suga and Biden Off to a Good Start

    US-JAPAN RELATIONS SUGA AND BIDEN OFF TO A GOOD START SHEILA A. SMITH, COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS CHARLES T. MCCLEAN , UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO The early months of 2021 offered a full diplomatic agenda for US-Japan relations as a new US administration took office. Joe Biden was sworn in as the 46th president of the United States amid considerable contention. Former President Donald Trump refused to concede defeat, and on Jan. 6, a crowd of his supporters stormed the US Capitol where Congressional representatives were certifying the results of the presidential election. The breach of the US Capitol shocked the nation and the world. Yet after his inauguration on Jan. 20, Biden and his foreign policy team soon got to work on implementing policies that emphasized on US allies and sought to restore US engagement in multilateral coalitions around the globe. The day after the inauguration, National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan reached out to his counterpart in Japan, National Security Secretariat Secretary General Kitamura Shigeru, to assure him of the importance the new administration placed on its allies. The COVID-19 pandemic continued to focus the attention of leaders in the United States and Japan, however. This article is extracted from Comparative Connections: A Triannual E-Journal of Bilateral Relations in the Indo-Pacific, Vol. 23, No. 1, May 2021. Preferred citation: Sheila A. Smith and Charles T. McClean, “US-Japan Relations: Suga and Biden Off to a Good Start,” Comparative Connections, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp 21-28. US- JAPAN RELATIONS | M AY 202 1 21 Prime Minister Suga Yoshihide faced rising on Asian allies and on the primacy of the US- numbers of infections, declaring a second state Japan partnership.
  • Mapping the Jihadist Threat: the War on Terror Since 9/11

    Mapping the Jihadist Threat: the War on Terror Since 9/11

    Campbell • Darsie Mapping the Jihadist Threat A Report of the Aspen Strategy Group 06-016 imeless ideas and values,imeless ideas contemporary dialogue on and open-minded issues. t per understanding in a nonpartisanper understanding and non-ideological setting. f e o e he mission ofhe mission enlightened leadership, foster is to Institute Aspen the d n T io ciat e r p Through seminars, policy programs, initiatives, development and leadership conferences the Institute and its international partners seek to promote the pursuit of the pursuit partners and its international promote seek to the Institute and ground common the ap Mapping the Jihadist Threat: The War on Terror Since 9/11 A Report of the Aspen Strategy Group Kurt M. Campbell, Editor Willow Darsie, Editor u Co-Chairmen Joseph S. Nye, Jr. Brent Scowcroft To obtain additional copies of this report, please contact: The Aspen Institute Fulfillment Office P.O. Box 222 109 Houghton Lab Lane Queenstown, Maryland 21658 Phone: (410) 820-5338 Fax: (410) 827-9174 E-mail: [email protected] For all other inquiries, please contact: The Aspen Institute Aspen Strategy Group Suite 700 One Dupont Circle, NW Washington, DC 20036 Phone: (202) 736-5800 Fax: (202) 467-0790 Copyright © 2006 The Aspen Institute Published in the United States of America 2006 by The Aspen Institute All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 0-89843-456-4 Inv No.: 06-016 CONTENTS DISCUSSANTS AND GUEST EXPERTS . 1 AGENDA . 5 WORKSHOP SCENE SETTER AND DISCUSSION GUIDE Kurt M. Campbell Aspen Strategy Group Workshop August 5-10, 2005 .
  • Michael Mcfaul

    Michael Mcfaul

    Michael McFaul Director, Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Ken Olivier and Angela Nomellini Professor of International Studies and Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, the Freeman Spogli Institute and the Woods Institute Political Science Curriculum Vitae available Online Bio BIO Michael McFaul is Director at the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, the Ken Olivier and Angela Nomellini Professor of International Studies in the Department of Political Science, and the Peter and Helen Bing Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution. He joined the Stanford faculty in 1995. Dr. McFaul also is as an International Affairs Analyst for NBC News and a columnist for The Washington Post. He served for five years in the Obama administration, first as Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for Russian and Eurasian Affairs at the National Security Council at the White House (2009-2012), and then as U.S. Ambassador to the Russian Federation (2012-2014). He has authored several books, most recently the New York Times bestseller From Cold War to Hot Peace: An American Ambassador in Putin’s Russia. Earlier books include Advancing Democracy Abroad: Why We Should, How We Can; Transitions To Democracy: A Comparative Perspective (eds. with Kathryn Stoner); Power and Purpose: American Policy toward Russia after the Cold War (with James Goldgeier); and Russia’s Unfinished Revolution: Political Change from Gorbachev to Putin. His current research interests include American foreign policy, great power relations, and the relationship between democracy and development. Dr. McFaul was born and raised in Montana. He received his B.A. in International Relations and Slavic Languages and his M.A.
  • ORGANIZING the PRESIDENCY Discussions by Presidential Advisers Back to FDR

    ORGANIZING the PRESIDENCY Discussions by Presidential Advisers Back to FDR

    A Brookings Book Event STEPHEN HESS BOOK UPDATED: ORGANIZING THE PRESIDENCY Discussions by Presidential Advisers back to FDR The Brookings Institution November 14, 2002 Moderator: STEPHEN HESS Senior Fellow, Governance Studies, Brookings; Eisenhower and Nixon Administrations Panelists: HARRY C. McPHERSON Partner - Piper, Rudnick LLP; Johnson Administration JAMES B. STEINBERG V.P. and Director, Foreign Policy Studies, Brookings; Clinton Administration GENE SPERLING Senior Fellow, Economic Policy, and Director, Center on Universal Education, Council on Foreign Relations; Clinton Administration GEORGE ELSEY President Emeritus, American Red Cross; Roosevelt, Truman Administrations RON NESSEN V.P. of Communications, Brookings; Ford Administration FRED FIELDING Partner, Wiley Rein & Fielding; Nixon, Reagan Administrations Professional Word Processing & Transcribing (801) 942-7044 MR. STEPHEN HESS: Welcome to Brookings. Today we are celebrating the publication of a new edition of my book “Organizing the Presidency,” which was first published in 1976. When there is still interest in a book that goes back more than a quarter of a century it’s cause for celebration. So when you celebrate you invite a bunch of your friends in to celebrate with you. We're here with seven people who have collectively served on the White House staffs of eight Presidents. I can assure you that we all have stories to tell and this is going to be for an hour and a half a chance to tell some of our favorite stories. I hope we'll be serious at times, but I know we're going to have some fun. I'm going to introduce them quickly in order of the President they served or are most identified with, and that would be on my right, George Elsey who is the President Emeritus of the American Red Cross and served on the White House staff of Franklin D.
  • S:\FULLCO~1\HEARIN~1\Committee Print 2018\Henry\Jan. 9 Report

    S:\FULLCO~1\HEARIN~1\Committee Print 2018\Henry\Jan. 9 Report

    Embargoed for Media Publication / Coverage until 6:00AM EST Wednesday, January 10. 1 115TH CONGRESS " ! S. PRT. 2d Session COMMITTEE PRINT 115–21 PUTIN’S ASYMMETRIC ASSAULT ON DEMOCRACY IN RUSSIA AND EUROPE: IMPLICATIONS FOR U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY A MINORITY STAFF REPORT PREPARED FOR THE USE OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JANUARY 10, 2018 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Relations Available via World Wide Web: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/index.html U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 28–110 PDF WASHINGTON : 2018 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Mar 15 2010 04:06 Jan 09, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5012 Sfmt 5012 S:\FULL COMMITTEE\HEARING FILES\COMMITTEE PRINT 2018\HENRY\JAN. 9 REPORT FOREI-42327 with DISTILLER seneagle Embargoed for Media Publication / Coverage until 6:00AM EST Wednesday, January 10. COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS BOB CORKER, Tennessee, Chairman JAMES E. RISCH, Idaho BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland MARCO RUBIO, Florida ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey RON JOHNSON, Wisconsin JEANNE SHAHEEN, New Hampshire JEFF FLAKE, Arizona CHRISTOPHER A. COONS, Delaware CORY GARDNER, Colorado TOM UDALL, New Mexico TODD YOUNG, Indiana CHRISTOPHER MURPHY, Connecticut JOHN BARRASSO, Wyoming TIM KAINE, Virginia JOHNNY ISAKSON, Georgia EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts ROB PORTMAN, Ohio JEFF MERKLEY, Oregon RAND PAUL, Kentucky CORY A. BOOKER, New Jersey TODD WOMACK, Staff Director JESSICA LEWIS, Democratic Staff Director JOHN DUTTON, Chief Clerk (II) VerDate Mar 15 2010 04:06 Jan 09, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\FULL COMMITTEE\HEARING FILES\COMMITTEE PRINT 2018\HENRY\JAN.
  • CRS Report for Congress Received Through the CRS Web

    CRS Report for Congress Received Through the CRS Web

    Order Code RL30341 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web China/Taiwan: Evolution of the “One China” Policy – Key Statements from Washington, Beijing, and Taipei Updated March 12, 2001 Shirley A. Kan Specialist in National Security Policy Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress This CRS Report was initiated upon a request from Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott in the 106th Congress. China/Taiwan: Evolution of the “One China” Policy – Key Statements from Washington, Beijing, and Taipei Summary On July 9, 1999, questions about the “one China” policy arose again after Lee Teng-hui, then-President of Taiwan, characterized cross-strait relations as “special state-to-state ties.” The Clinton Administration responded that Lee’s statement was not helpful and reaffirmed the “one China” policy and opposition to “two Chinas.” Beijing, in February 2000, issued its second White Paper on Taiwan, reaffirming its “peaceful unification” policy but with new warnings about the risk of conflict. There also have been questions about whether and how President Chen Shui-bian, inaugurated in May 2000, might adjust Taiwan’s policy toward the Mainland. In Part I, this CRS report discusses the policy on “one China” since the United States began in 1971 to reach understandings with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) government in Beijing. Part II documents the evolution of the “one China” principle as articulated in key statements by Washington, Beijing, and Taipei. Despite apparently consistent statements over almost three decades, the critical “one China” principle has been left somewhat ambiguous and subject to different interpretations among Washington, Beijing, and Taipei.
  • The Information Below Is Based on the Information Supplied to EPLO and Stored in Its Archives and May Differ from the Fina

    The Information Below Is Based on the Information Supplied to EPLO and Stored in Its Archives and May Differ from the Fina

    European Parliament Delegation Visits to the US - 2010 Situation: 01 July 2010 MT/mt Date Delegation Number of Meetings (Congress, Administration and Bretton-Woods Institutions) Participants MEPs Staff* 2010-02-16 Member of President's 1 Initial preparation of President Buzek´s Visit Cabinet 2010-02- ECR Bureau 9 4 David Heyman, Assistant Secretary for Policy, TSA Dan Russell, Deputy Assistant Secretary ,State Dept Deputy Assistant Secretary Limbert, Senior Advisor Elisa Catalano, State Dept Stuart Jones, Deputy Assistant Secretary, State Dept Ambassor Richard Morningstar, US Special Envoy on Eurasian Energy Todd Holmstrom, State Dept Cass Sunstein, Administrator, Office of Information and Regulatory Affiars Kristina Kvien, NSC Sumona Guha, Office of Vice-President Gordon Matlock, Senate Intelligence Cttee Staff Margaret Evans, Senate Intelligence Cttee Staff Clee Johnson, Senate Intelligence Cttee Staff Staff Senator Risch Mark Koumans, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Dept Homeland Security Michael Scardeville, Director for European and Multilateral Affairs, Dept Homeland Security Staff Senators Lieberman, Thune, DeMint 2010-02-18 Mrs Lochbihler MEP 1 Meetings on Iran 2010-03-03-5 Bureau US 6 2 Representative Shelley Berkley, Co-Chair, TLD Representative William Delahunt, Chair, House Europe SubCommittee Doug Hengel, Energy and Sanctions Deputy Assistant Secretary Senator Jeanne Shaheen, Chair Subcommittee on European Affairs Representative Cliff Stearns Stuart Levey, Treasury Under Secretary John Brennan, Assistant to the President for
  • Rhodes Scholar Magazine

    Rhodes Scholar Magazine

    EDITION 2 • 2015 Democracy and the City How where we live can foster innovation Rhodes House Tel: +44 (0)1865 270905 facebook.com/RhodesTrust South Parks Road Email: [email protected] @rhodes_trust An insight into... Oxford OX1 3RG Web: rhodeshouse.ox.ac.uk Voices from the LGBTQ Rhodes community United Kingdom Rhodes Scholarships Global Community RhodesTrust Unexpected Oxford 21st century leadership How the city of dreaming spires can continue to surprise Admire Kamudzengerere (Zimbabwe), My Other Mask, Lithograph 6 Democracy and the City Looking at urban spaces in new ways 9 Guns and What? African Contemporary Art on the Rise An evocative look at new African Art 12 Oxford Remembered: Duet amongst the Dreaming Spires 14 Rhodes Retreat The new Service & Leadership Programme at Rhodes House 16 A Cane Do Attitude SmartCane technology innovations 9 Editorial information 18 Insight into... the Rhodes LGBTQ community Artistry in Africa The Rhodes Magazine is published annually in print format by the Rhodes Trust in Oxford and supplemented each year by two electronic 22 Oxford News updates. News from the University of Oxford and The Mandela Rhodes Editor: Babette Tegldal, Communications Manager Foundation Tel: +44 (0)1865 270905 Email: [email protected] 24 Unexpected Oxford Design: Jamjar Creative Cover image: By current Scholar Vinesh Rajpaul How Oxford manages to surprise, inspire and confuse (South African College School, Newlands & Merton 2013); his work can be viewed at vineshrajpaul.com. He and his fiancée (also an 26 Rhodes Scholars in Research award-winning photographer and Oxford student) have been documenting life in and around the University, with a view to publishing 28 Try, Try, Try Again a collection of their photographic work.