Chinese Intellectuals' Reconstruction of Confucianism in the Late 19Th And
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Chinese intellectuals’ reconstruction of Confucianism in the late 19th and early 20th Century Chi Ho Ivan Hon (113004) June 2005 This dissertation is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MPhil in Study of Religions at the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London ProQuest Number: 10672871 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10672871 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 I undertake that all material presented for examination is my own work and has not been written for me, in whole or in part, by any other person(s). I also undertake that any quotation or paraphrase from the published or unpublished work of another person has been duly acknowledged in the work, which I present for examination. Chi Ho Ivan Hon Abstract This thesis is about Chinese intellectuals’ attempt to reconstruct Confucianism in reaction to the external challenges and internal changes of China in the late 19th and early 20th century. Chapter 1 examines Kang Youwei, Liang Qichao and Zhang Taiyan’s re- evaluation of Confucianism. It analyses their discourse on whether Confucianism was a religion, whether it should be transformed into a religion and adopted as the state religion, the religiousness of Confucianism and the religion-secular dichotomy. Chapter 2 examines Kang, Liang and Zhang’s reappraisal of Confucius and reconstruction of his images. It analyses how their different representations of Confucius were linked with their attempts to manipulate Confucius as a national, religious and cultural symbol of China to construct national identity, mobilise Chinese people for nationalist movements and promote cultural nationalism. Chapter 3 examines Kang, Liang and Zhang’s reinterpretation of Confucian notions. It analyses how Kang reinterpreted the Confucian notion of “Three Ages” and synthesized it with modem Western political and social ideas for advocating reforms, how Liang reinterpreted Mencius’ notion of “Primacy of the people” for advocating democracy as well as how Zhang and Kang’s arguments on the interpretation of “Three Ages” were linked with the political and ideological disputes between Chinese reformers and revolutionaries in the early 20th Century. Chapter 4 analyses how the reconstruction of Confucianism influenced the intellectual and cultural development of China in the 20th Century, such as the New Culture and May Fourth Movement, New Confucianism, the discourse on Confucianism’s impact on modernisation and economic development as well as revitalising Confucian ethics and values as national ethical system and contents of moral education to solve the problems of modem societies. In the conclusion, I argue that the reconstruction of Confucianism had influenced Confucianism’s relations with religion, nation, modernity and culture as well as challenged and problematized these notions. 3 Table of Contents Content Pase Introduction 5 Chapter 1: Re-evaluation of Confucianism 11 and the discourse on “Confucian religion” Chapter 2: Reappraisal of Confucius and 38 reconstruction of his images Chapter 3: Reinterpretation of Confucian 65 notions Chapter 4: Impact of reconstruction of 92 Confucianism Conclusion 124 Glossary 133 Bibliography 137 4 Introduction Although China was forcibly opened to the West after the Opium War in the mid-19th Century, the Confucian orthodoxy and the traditional social, political and cultural order of China on which it was based remained intact until late 19th Century. Although attempts had been made to strengthen China and develop its economy by adopting Western science, technologies, military skills and enterprises dining the Self-Strengthening Movement (tWIrMlij 1864-1894), this was confined to learning from the West at a technical level while Confucian orthodoxy was asserted dining the same period. However, China’s military defeat in 1894 by Japan, which had undertaken comprehensive reforms based on Western lines and adopted Western ideas in large scale after the Meiji Restoration in 1868, had convinced many Chinese intellectuals of the need to reconstruct Confucianism, adopt Western ideas and strengthen China on Western lines. Moreover, China was faced with drastic external challenges and internal changes in the late 19th and early 20th Centuries. On the one hand, there was intensification of foreign aggression, influx of political and social ideas from the West and increase in influence of Christianity. On the other hand, reforms, revolutions and nationalist movements took place during this period which brought political and social changes in China. Since external events and internal realignment of groups and power encouraged reconstruction and new understandings of collective traditions, which involves reinterpretation of the pattern of memories, values, symbols, myths and traditions that compose the distinctive heritage of the nation(l), Chinese intellectuals such as Kang Youwei (fll^ jij 1858-1927), Liang Qichao 1873- 1929) and Zhang Taiyan ( jpi 3<l 1869-1936) reinterpreted and reconstructed Confucianism, which was a major component of Chinese tradition, in this period. Since Kang, Liang and Zhang were leaders of nationalist movements, their reconstruction of Confucianism was closely linked with the emergence and development of nationalism, nationalist movements and the nation building process of China in this period. It was also closely linked with their attempt to transform Confucianism to serve the interests of reform, revolution, nationalist movement and transforming China into a modern nation as well as to construct and justify their discourse on reform, revolution, nationalism and cultural nationalism. Since nationalism, as a socio-political movement, emphasizes cultural gestation and representation, the ideologies of nationalism require an immersion in the culture of the nation and the rediscovery of its history(2). Therefore, Kang, Liang and Zhang had extensively immersed themselves in Chinese cultural tradition and reinterpreted Chinese history (e.g. Chinese historical figures and incidents) as the basis on which to reconstruct Confucianism for nationalist purposes. 1. Anthony Smith, Nationalism: Theory , ideology, history (Polity Press, 2001), P.201 2. Ibid. P.6-8 5 Kang Youwei was the leader of the reform movement in China in the late 19th and early 20th Century, Kang was impressed with Western institutions during his visits to Hong Kong (1879) and Shanghai (1882) as well as being exposed to modern Western ideas through reading translated Western works in his early years. In 1887, Kang first indicated his idea to reform China in “ Introduction to the notes o f Li Yun /WMYfM" while his ideas of social reform and the “world of great unity” can be traced to his “ Complete work on principles o f truth and universal law published in the same year. In 1888, Kang first petitioned the Chinese emperor to reform China in his “ First petition to the Qing emperor hfftfYWL—-j^”. In 1891, Kang wrote “A Study o f the Forgeries o f the Xin Dynasty which argued that all Ancient Text Classics on which Confucian orthodoxy was based were forgeries. In 1893, Kang began to deify Confucius, transform him into a religious symbol and stress the relation between Heaven and Human in “Dong’s study of Spring and Autumn Annals as the foundation of the religiousness of Confucianism. In 1895, Kang, together with a group of Chinese intellectuals, petitioned the emperor to reform again in reaction to China’s defeat by Japan, which marked the beginning of the reform movement. In 1898, Kang consolidated his reinterpretation of the Gong-yang notion of “Three Ages” as a theory of progressive historical evolution and published “A Study o f the Institutional Reforms o f Confucius fL which stressed the image of Confucius as an institutional reformer. Between June and September of that year, Kang launched a series of reforms in China, including the adoption of Confucianism as state religion. During his exile after the failure of the 1898 reform, Kang reinterpreted Analects, Mencius, Doctrine of the Mean and Great Learning between 1901 and 1902 as well as writing “ Book of Great Unity y k /n /0 ” in 1902 which illustrated his ideal of a unified world of equality, democracy and fraternity. Before the 1911 Revolution, Kang wrote a series of articles like “ Republican form of government cannot be implemented in China (1905) and “Study on the difficulty o f differentiating races since there are alien races in the Han race while Yellow Emperor was also the ancestor to the Manchu race 0 M M W f Jlf ^7 •# ” (1911) to continue advocating constitutional monarchy in China while opposing the revolutionaries’ attempt to overthrow the Qing dynasty on a racial discourse and replace it with a republic. After the establishment of the republic in 1912, Kang indicated his concern with the moral decay in China and the loss of Chinese culture and tradition as well as his attempt to solve these problems by adopting Confucian religion as state