DOCSLIB.ORG

THE PHILOSOPHY BOOK George Santayana (1863-1952)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE PHILOSOPHY BOOK George Santayana (1863-1952) Georg Hegel (1770-1831) ................................ 30 Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) ................. 32 Ludwig Andreas Feuerbach (1804-1872) ...... 32 John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) .......................... 33 Soren Kierkegaard (1813-1855) ..................... 33 Karl Marx (1818-1883).................................... 34 Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862) ................ 35 Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914).............. 35 William James (1842-1910) ............................ 36 The Modern World 1900-1950 ............................. 36 Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) .................... 37 Ahad Ha'am (1856-1927) ............................... 38 Ferdinand de Saussure (1857-1913) ............. 38 Edmund Husserl (1859–1938) ....................... 39 Henri Bergson (1859-1941) ............................ 39 Contents John Dewey (1859–1952) ............................... 39 Introduction....................................................... 1 THE PHILOSOPHY BOOK George Santayana (1863-1952) ..................... 40 The Ancient World 700 BCE-250 CE..................... 3 Miguel de Unamuno (1864-1936) ................... 40 Introduction Thales of Miletus (c.624-546 BCE)................... 3 William Du Bois (1868-1963) .......................... 41 Laozi (c.6th century BCE) ................................. 4 Philosophy is not just the preserve of brilliant Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) ........................ 41 Pythagoras (c.570-495 BCE) ............................ 4 but eccentric thinkers that it is popularly Max Scheler (1874-1928) ................................ 42 supposed to be. It is what everyone does when Siddhartha Gautama (c.563-483 BCE)............ 5 they're not busy dealing with their everyday Karl Jaspers (1883-1969 ................................ 42 Confucius (551-479 BCE) ................................. 6 business and get a chance simply to wonder what Jose Ortega y Gasset (1883-1955) ................. 42 life and the universe are all about. We human Heraclitus (535–475 BCE) ................................ 6 Hajime Tanabe (1885-1962) ........................... 42 beings are naturally inquisitive creatures, and Parmenides (515-445 BCE) .............................. 7 can't help wondering about the world around us Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889-1951) .................. 43 and our place in it. We're also equipped with a Protagoras (c.490-420 BCE) ............................. 7 Martin Heidegger (1889-1976) ....................... 44 powerful intellectual capability, which allows us to Mozi (470–391 BCE) ......................................... 7 reason as well as just wonder. Although we may Tetsuro Watsuji (1889-1960) .......................... 45 Democritus (460-371 BCE) and Leucippus (5th not realize it, whenever we reason, we're thinking century BCE) ..................................................... 7 Rudolf Carnap (1891-1970) ............................ 45 philosophically. Philosophy is not so much about coming up Socrates (469-399 BCE) ................................... 8 Walter Benjamin (1892-1940) ........................ 45 with the answers to fundamental questions as it Plato (c.427-347 BCE) ...................................... 8 Herbert Marcuse (1898-1979) ........................ 45 is about the process of trying to find these Aristotle (384-322 BCE).................................... 9 Hans-Georg Gadamer (1900-2002) ................ 45 answers, using reasoning rather than accepting without question conventional views or traditional Karl Popper (1902-1994) ................................. 46 Epicurus (341-270 BCE) ................................. 11 authority. The very first philosophers, in ancient Diogenes of Sinope (404-323 BCE) ................ 11 Theodor Adorno (1903-1969) .......................... 46 Greece and China, were thinkers who were not satisfied with the established explanations Zeno of Citium (332-265 BCE)........................ 11 Jean-Paul Sartre (1905-1980) ........................ 47 provided by religion and custom, and sought The Medieval World 250-1500 ............................ 12 Hannah Arendt (1906-1975) .......................... 48 answers which had rational justifications. And, Augustine of Hippo (354-430 CE) .................. 12 Emmanuel Levinas (1906-1995) .................... 48 just as we might share our views with friends and colleagues, they discussed their ideas with one Maurice Merleau-Ponty (1908-1961) .............. 48 Boethius (c.480-525 CE) ................................ 12 another, and even set up “schools" to teach not Avicenna (980-1037) ...................................... 13 Simone de Beauvoir (1908-1986) ................... 48 just the conclusions they had come to, but the way they had come to them. They encouraged St. Anselm (1033-1109).................................. 14 Willard Van Orman Quine (1908-2000) ......... 49 their students to disagree and criticize ideas as a Averroes (1126-1198) ..................................... 14 Isaiah Berlin (1909-1997) ............................... 49 means of refining them and coming up with new Moses Maimonides (1135-1204) .................... 14 Arne Naess (1912-2009) ................................. 49 and different ones. A popular misconception is that of the solitary philosopher arriving at his Jalal ad-Din Muhammad Rumi (1207-1273) . 15 Albert Camus (1913-1960) ............................. 50 conclusions in isolation, but this is actually Thomas Aquinas (c. 1225-1274) .................... 15 Contemporary Philosophy 1950-Present ............. 50 seldom the case. New ideas emerge through Roland Barthes (1915-1980) .......................... 51 discussion and the examination, analysis, and Nikolaus von Kues (1401-1464)..................... 16 criticism of other people's ideas. Desiderius Erasmus (1466-1536) .................. 17 Mary Midgley (1919-) ...................................... 51 Debate and dialogue Renaissance and Age of Reason 1500-1750 ...... 17 Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996) ............................. 51 The archetypical philosopher in this respect Niccolo Machiavelli (1469-1527) .................... 17 John Rawls (1921-2002) ................................ 51 was Socrates. He didn't leave any writings, or even Michel de Montaigne (1533-1592) ................. 18 Richard Wollheim (1923-2003) ....................... 52 any big ideas as the conclusions of his thinking. Indeed, he prided himself on being the wisest of Paul Feyerabend (1924-1994) ........................ 52 Francis Bacon (1561-1626) ............................ 19 men because he knew he didn't know anything. Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) ......................... 19 Jean-Frangois Lyotard (1924-1998)............... 52 His legacy lay in the tradition he established of debate and discussion, of questioning the Rene Descartes (1596-1650) .......................... 20 Frantz Fanon (1925-1961) .............................. 53 assumptions of other people to gain deeper Blaise Pascal (1623-1662) ............................. 21 Michel Foucault (1926-1984) .......................... 53 understanding and elicit fundamental truths. The Benedictus Spinoza (1632-1677) ................... 21 Noam Chomsky (1928-) .................................. 53 writings of Socrates' pupil, Plato, are almost invariably in the form of dialogues, with Socrates Jurgen Habermas (1929-) ............................... 54 John Locke (1632-1704) ................................. 22 as a major character. Many later philosophers Gottfried Leibniz (1646-1716) ........................ 23 Jacques Derrida (1930-2004) ......................... 54 also adopted the device of dialogues to present their ideas, giving arguments and George Berkeley (1685-1753) ........................ 24 Richard Rorty (1931-2007) ............................. 55 counterarguments rather than a simple statement The Age of Revolution 1750-1900 ....................... 24 Luce Irigaray (1932-) ....................................... 56 of their reasoning and conclusions. Voltaire (1694-1778)....................................... 25 Edward Said (1935-2003) .............................. 56 The philosopher who presents his ideas to the world is liable to be met with comments beginning Helene Cixous (1937-) ..................................... 56 David Hume (1711-1776) ............................... 25 “Yes, but ..." or “What if ..." rather than Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778) ........... 26 Julia Kristeva (1941-)...................................... 56 wholehearted acceptance. In fact, philosophers have fiercely disagreed Adam Smith (1723-1790) ............................... 27 Henry Odera Oruka (1944-1995) ................... 57 with one another about almost every aspect of Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) .......................... 28 Peter Singer (1946-)......................................... 57 philosophy. Plato and his pupil Aristotle, for Edmund Burke (1729-1797) .......................... 29 Slavoj Zizek (1949-) ......................................... 57 example, held diametrically opposed views on fundamental philosophical questions, and their Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) ....................... 29 different approaches have divided opinions among Mary Wollstonecraft (1759-1797) .................. 30 philosophers ever since. This has, in turn, provoked more discussion and prompted yet more Johann Gottlieb Fichte (1762-1814) .............. 30 fresh ideas. Friedrich Schlegel (1772-1829) ...................... 30 Philosophy 1 But how can it be that these philosophical
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NOTES Chuang Tzu, the Book of Chuang Tzu, IT. Palmer, Breuilly
    NOTES FACING THE GLOBAL CRISIS: 1 THE ROLE OF PHILOSOPHY IN CHALLENGING ECONOMIC Chuang Tzu, The Book of Chuang Tzu, IT. Palmer, Breuilly Ming d Ramsay (London: Penguin Books, 2006), p. xx . " an POWERS' 2 Lud~ig Wiltgenslein. Remarks 0 11 Frazer's Golden Bough. Philosophical Si/ja Graupe OccaslOns. Ed. J. Klagge and A. Nordmann (Indianapolis, IN and Cambndge, MA: HackeLt, 1993), p. 125 . INTRODUCTION 3 WiLtgenstein, Philosophical Occasions, p. 129. 'Wittgenstein, Philosophical Occasions, p. 133. When allending the opening ceremony of the XXII World Congress of Philosophy at Seoul National University, I was struck by the welcoming l Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Tr. R. J. Hollingdale words of Peter Kemp, President of the Congress: (London: Penguin Books, 2003), pp. 329-330. To rethink philosophy today is to apply our philosophical capacities 6 Peter Kingsley, Reality (Inverness, CA: The Golden Sufi Center 2003) pp.190-1. ' , to the current situation of humanity. One often forgets that the economical, technological and military powers do nOl possess the 'N'le tzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, pp. 14-5. monopoly of power in the world. Philosophical argumentation and reflection constitute a power through the word that is capable of 8 Gabriel Marcel, The Mystery of Being: Reflection and Mystery. Tr. G S. challenging the other powers, exposing the lies and the i11usions Fraser. (South Bend, IN: St. Augusttne's Press, 2001), pp. 191-6. and proposing a belter world as the habitation of humanity. In this sense true philosophy is cosmopolitan, it is a fight to create a world 9 ~arti~ Heide~ger,.
    [Show full text]
  • Johann Gottlieb Fichte, Addresses to the German Nation (1807/08)
    Volume 2. From Absolutism to Napoleon, 1648-1815 Johann Gottlieb Fichte, Addresses to the German Nation (1807/08) Johann Gottlieb Fichte (1762-1814) was a distinguished post-Kantian philosopher and notorious intellectual radical who was stripped of his Jena professorship in 1798 after allegations of atheism and Jacobinism were raised against him. Finding refuge in Prussia, he was appointed professor at the new University of Berlin, a post he held from 1810 until his death, four years later, at the age of 52. His addresses have been stigmatized as expressions of intolerant and megalomaniacal German nationalism. In reality, their worst fault is intemperate anti-French sentiment, not surprising in the era of the Napoleonic domination of Germany. These excerpts display Fichte’s inclination to interpret “Germanness” as a philosophical disposition that includes a drive toward the attainment of freedom and a liberal state (though he does not advocate a single German nation-state). The text displays the influence of German liberal historicism, Kantian moral-political philosophy, and Herderian concerns with national identity. Addresses to the German Nation Johann Gottlieb Fichte Seventh Address A Closer Study of the Originality and Characteristics of a People In the preceding addresses we have indicated and proved from history the characteristics of the Germans as an original people, and as a people that has the right to call itself simply the people, in contrast to other branches that have been torn away from it; for indeed the word “deutsch” in its real signification denotes what we have just said. It will be in accordance with our purpose if we devote another hour to this subject and deal with a possible objection, viz., that if this is something peculiarly German one must confess that at the present time there is but little left that is German among the Germans themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy Course Offerings – Spring 2019 –
    PHILOSOPHY COURSE OFFERINGS – SPRING 2019 – 200-level Courses (Tier Two) PHIL 272: Metaphysics | Andrew Cutrofello In Plato’s Phaedo, Socrates suggests that physics—the study of the physical world—can only tell us so much. There are things that physics cannot tell us about, such as the nature of justice or whether we have immortal souls. These topics belong to what we now call metaphysics. The prefix “meta-“ means “after” or “beyond.” Traditionally, it was the job of poets to deal with metaphysical topics. One of Plato’s goals is to explain the difference between poetic and philosophical approaches to metaphysical topics, while maintaining the difference between metaphysics and physics. Ever since, philosophers have struggled to articulate the relationship between physics, metaphysics, and poetry. Some have argued that as physics has become more sophisticated, it has swallowed up metaphysics. Others have argued that all metaphysics – even that of Plato – is just a kind of poetry. Still others have followed Plato in trying to carve out a special domain for metaphysics. In this class we survey various approaches to this problem. We will begin with Plato and then move on to Immanuel Kant, Kitaro Nishida, Susan Howe (a poet, writing about the philosopher Charles Peirce), and Werner Heisenberg (a physicist, writing about the relationship between physics and metaphysics). PHIL 274: Logic | Harry Gensler This course aims to promote reasoning skills, especially the ability to recognize valid reasoning. We'll study syllogistic, propositional, modal, and basic quantificational logic. We'll use these to analyze hundreds of arguments, many on philosophical topics like morality, free will, and the existence of God.
    [Show full text]
  • Novalis's Magical Idealism
    Symphilosophie International Journal of Philosophical Romanticism Novalis’s Magical Idealism A Threefold Philosophy of the Imagination, Love and Medicine Laure Cahen-Maurel* ABSTRACT This article argues that Novalis’s philosophy of magical idealism essentially consists of three central elements: a theory of the creative or productive imagination, a conception of love, and a doctrine of transcendental medicine. In this regard, it synthesizes two adjacent, but divergent contemporary philosophical sources – J. G. Fichte’s idealism and Friedrich Schiller’s classicism – into a new and original philosophy. It demonstrates that Novalis’s views on both magic and idealism, not only prove to be perfectly rational and comprehensible, but even more philosophically coherent and innovative than have been recognised up to now. Keywords: magical idealism, productive imagination, love, medicine, Novalis, J. G. Fichte, Schiller RÉSUMÉ Cet article défend l’idée selon laquelle trois éléments centraux composent ce que Novalis nomme « idéalisme magique » pour désigner sa philosophie propre : la conception d’une imagination créatrice ou productrice, une doctrine de l’amour et une théorie de la médecine transcendantale. L’idéalisme magique est en cela la synthèse en une philosophie nouvelle et originale de deux sources philosophiques contemporaines, à la fois adjacentes et divergentes : l’idéalisme de J. G. Fichte et le classicisme de Friedrich Schiller. L’article montre que les vues de Novalis tant sur la magie que sur l’idéalisme sont non seulement réellement rationnelles et compréhensibles, mais philosophiquement plus cohérentes et novatrices qu’on ne l’a admis jusqu’à présent. Mots-clés : idéalisme magique, imagination productrice, amour, médecine, Novalis, J. G.
    [Show full text]
  • Metanoia As a Response to Philosophy's Death
    KRITIKE VOLUME FIVE NUMBER ONE (JUNE 2011) 62-69 Article Metanoia as a Response to Philosophy’s Death: From Injustice to Conversion Jonathan Ray Villacorta Abstract: When the fate of the Japanese people has been decided at the end of the war, the Japanese intellectuals cannot feign a naïve stance of innocence that would have mitigated pursed lips, silent pens and empty sheets of paper. And when some of them did take this recourse, or worse, tried to revise their earlier positions with regard to the Japanese’ involvement in the World War by tampering on their published works, Hajime Tanabe took the road less traveled and confronted the issue of flawed scientific philosophical position head-on; his is a genuine attempt at self-criticism that would put to question every inveterate beliefs one has held at the expense of an openness to a reality that is neither pre-given nor statically perfect. This paper, then, will be a reflection on Tanabe’s suggestion on what we should or could do if rationality has become pathological, if thinking can no longer contain the irrational, and if at the demise of philosophy, nothing remains but the haunting gossamer of injustice’s debris crying for recognition, demanding for an apology. Key words: Hajime Tanabe, metanoia, zange, metanoetics Prologue hen the fate of the Japanese people was decided at the end of the Second World War, the Japanese intellectuals could not feign a naïve Wstance of innocence that would have mitigated pursed lips, silent pens and empty sheets of paper. And when some of them did take this recourse, or worse, tried to revise their earlier positions with regard to the Japanese’ involvement in the War by tampering on their published works, Hajime Tanabe took the road less traveled and confronted the issue of flawed scientific philosophical position head-on.1 The easy path of preserving through 1 James Heisig gave a picturesque portrait of this event.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflection 19
    1. Editor’s Message 2. Can Animals be Moral Agents? 3. Intersectional Feminism 4. The Millennial Identity 5. A Brief Overview of Buddhist Ethics 6. World Philosophies 7. An Argument for Veganism 8. Philosophy of Language: The Linguistic Turn 9. A Question Concerning Agency of Self-driven Cars 10. Reflections on Heidegger’s “The Question Concerning Technology” 11. Abstraction and Interpretation in Art 12. Artworks and Photography 13. Activity Report 14. Appearance and Reality Greetings! Reflection – the annual newsletter of Department of Philosophy – is an endeavour to celebrate introspective thought in philosophy, and provides a forum to the students to express and share their deliberations on the topics and concerns they feel strongly about. The current issue of Reflection presents a collection of short essays, artworks and photographs, and a glimpse at the events last year. Contributors have presented their philosophical reflections and have raised crucial questions on a range of topics in areas like morality and ethics, philosophy of language, technology and art. We highly appreciate all the contributions and sincerely thank all the teachers for their constant guidance and support. Happy Reading! I hear a woman arguing with the guard about a sign recently placed outside the elevator doors which says “Pets not allowed”. She is holding the leash of her husky, and ardently pleading that it’s not just a dog, “He is her son.” Just like this woman, people of New York found an ingenious way to evade the “pets not allowed on the subway, unless they are in a carrier” rule by carrying their not-so-small pets in huge tote bags.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawrence Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development from Wikipedia
    ECS 188 First Readings Winter 2017 There are two readings for Wednesday. Both are edited versions of Wikipedia articles. The first reading adapted from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Kohlberg's_stages_of_moral_development, and the second reading is adapted from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethics. You can find the references for the footnotes there. As you read the article about moral development please think about you answered the Heinz Dilemma in class, and in which stage did your justification lie. I do not plan on discussing our answers to the Heinz Dilemma any further in class. As you read the ethic article, please think about which Normative ethic appeals to you, and why. This will be one of the questions we will discuss on Wednesday. My goal for both of these readings is to help you realize what values you bring to your life, and our course in particular. Lawrence Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development from Wikipedia Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development constitute an adaptation of a psychological theory originally conceived by the Swiss psychologist Jean Piaget. Kohlberg began work on this topic while a psychology graduate student at the University of Chicago[1] in 1958, and expanded upon the theory throughout his life. The theory holds that moral reasoning, the basis for ethical behavior, has six identifiable developmental stages, each more adequate at responding to moral dilemmas than its predecessor.[2] Kohlberg followed the development of moral judgment far beyond the ages studied earlier by Piaget,[3] who also claimed that logic and morality develop through constructive stages.[2] Expanding on Piaget's work, Kohlberg determined that the process of moral development was principally concerned with justice, and that it continued throughout the individual's lifetime,[4] a notion that spawned dialogue on the philosophical implications of such research.[5][6] The six stages of moral development are grouped into three levels: pre-conventional morality, conventional morality, and post-conventional morality.
    [Show full text]
  • A Climate: a Philosophical Study
    A CLIMATE A Philosophical Study by WATSUJI TETSURO translated by GEOFFREY BOWNAS Lecturer, Oxford University Published by PRINTINGBUREAU, JAPANESE GOVERNMENT A CLIMATE A Philosophical Study by WATSUJI TETSURO translated by GEOFFREY BOWNAS Lecturer, Oxford University Published by PRINTINGBUREAU, JAPANESE GOVERNMENT Unesco, at the 9th session of its General Conference held in New Delhi in 1956, decided to launch the Major Project on the Mutual Appreciation of Eastern and Western Cultural Values. In accordance with this decision this Commission has been carrying on since 1958, within the framework of the project, a programme of publishing modern Japanese philosophical works into foreign languages. In 1959, we put out an English translation of "The Ways of Thinking of Eastern Peoples" by Nakamura Hajime; and in 1960 "A Study of Good" by Nishida Kitaro. The present 7101- ume, "A Climate" by Watsuji Tetsuro, is the third of the series and is to be followed in 1962 by an English version of "Time and Eternity" by Hatano Seiichi. Watsuji Tetsuro, one of the foremost scholars in the field of ethics in Japan, attempted in his present book to expound his views in concrete and easy terms on "the function of climate as a factor within the structure of human existence", which represents an aspect of his profound thought. It is our sincere wish that this programme will prove to be a contribution to the development of mutual understanding among the peoples of the world, as well as a closer cultural link between the East and West. Japanese National Commission for Unesco Unesco, at the 9th session of its General Conference held in New Delhi in 1956, decided to launch the Major Project on the Mutual Appreciation of Eastern and Western Cultural Values.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions to Phenomenology
    Contributions To Phenomenology In Cooperation with The Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology Volume 101 Series Editors Nicolas de Warren, Pennsylvania State University, PA, USA Ted Toadvine, Pennsylvania State University, PA, USA Editorial Board Lilian Alweiss, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland Elizabeth Behnke, Ferndale, WA, USA Rudolfh Bernet, Husserl Archive, KU Leuven, Belgium David Carr, Emory University, GA, USA Chan-Fai Cheung, Chinese University Hong Kong, China James Dodd, New School University, NY, USA Lester Embree, Florida Atlantic University, FL, USA Alfredo Ferrarin, Università di Pisa, Italy Burt Hopkins, University of Lille, France José Huertas-Jourda, Wilfrid Laurier University, Canada Kwok-Ying Lau, Chinese University Hong Kong, China Nam-In Lee, Seoul National University, Korea Rosemary R.P. Lerner, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Peru Dieter Lohmar, University of Cologne, Germany William R. McKenna, Miami University, OH, USA Algis Mickunas, Ohio University, OH, USA J.N. Mohanty, Temple University, PA, USA Junichi Murata, University of Tokyo, Japan Thomas Nenon, The University of Memphis, TN, USA Thomas M. Seebohm, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Germany Gail Soffer, Rome, Italy Anthony Steinbock, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, IL, USA Shigeru Taguchi, Hokkaido University, Japan Dan Zahavi, University of Copenhagen, Denmark Richard M. Zaner, Vanderbilt University, TN, USA Scope The purpose of the series is to serve as a vehicle for the pursuit of phenomenological research across a broad spectrum, including cross-over developments with other fields of inquiry such as the social sciences and cognitive science. Since its establishment in 1987, Contributions to Phenomenology has published more than 80 titles on diverse themes of phenomenological philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Was Protagoras? • Born in Abdêra, an Ionian Pólis in Thrace
    Recovering the wisdom of Protagoras from a reinterpretation of the Prometheia trilogy Prometheus (c.1933) by Paul Manship (1885-1966) By: Marty Sulek, Ph.D. Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy For: Workshop In Multidisciplinary Philanthropic Studies February 10, 2015 Composed for inclusion in a Festschrift in honour of Dr. Laurence Lampert, a Canadian philosopher and leading scholar in the field of Nietzsche studies, and a professor emeritus of Philosophy at IUPUI. Adult Content Warning • Nudity • Sex • Violence • And other inappropriate Prometheus Chained by Vulcan (1623) themes… by Dirck van Baburen (1595-1624) Nietzsche on Protagoras & the Sophists “The Greek culture of the Sophists had developed out of all the Greek instincts; it belongs to the culture of the Periclean age as necessarily as Plato does not: it has its predecessors in Heraclitus, in Democritus, in the scientific types of the old philosophy; it finds expression in, e.g., the high culture of Thucydides. And – it has ultimately shown itself to be right: every advance in epistemological and moral knowledge has reinstated the Sophists – Our contemporary way of thinking is to a great extent Heraclitean, Democritean, and Protagorean: it suffices to say it is Protagorean, because Protagoras represented a synthesis of Heraclitus and Democritus.” Nietzsche, The Will to Power, 2.428 Reappraisals of the authorship & dating of the Prometheia trilogy • Traditionally thought to have been composed by Aeschylus (c.525-c.456 BCE). • More recent scholarship has demonstrated the play to have been written by a later, lesser author sometime in the 430s. • This new dating raises many questions as to what contemporary events the trilogy may be referring.
    [Show full text]
  • Augustine on Heart and Life Essays in Memory of William Harmless, S.J
    Augustine on Heart and Life Essays in Memory of William Harmless, S.J. Edited by John J. O’Keefe and Michael Cameron 10. Augustine’s Tragic Vision Paul M. Blowers, Emmanuel Christian Seminary at Milligan College Abstract This essay explores Augustine’s capacity to accommodate a tragic vision of human existence within his interpretation of the Christian revelation. Broadly speaking, for Augustine, sacred history combines the tragic necessity of self-inflicted human sinfulness with the benevolent necessity of the economy of divine grace. Augustine to some degree admired the pagan tragedians for compelling the attention and emotion of their audiences in confronting the ineluctability of evil (and other tragic themes), but their mimesis ultimately failed since it could not touch the reality conveyed in divine revelation. Two exegetical test cases, the story of Jephthah’s sacrifice of his daughter (Judges 11) and King Saul’s tragic heroics in 1 Samuel, exemplify how Augustine greatly profited from interpreting Scripture through a tragical lens. A whole other dimension of Augustine’s tragic vision appears in his attempt – inspired from his own early experience of staged tragedies in Carthage – to reenter ancient philosophical debates on tragedy and mimesis, and to revamp in Christian terms the tragic emotions, especially tragic pity as Christian mercy. 157 Augustine on Heart and Life Keywords: tragedy, necessity, theodicy, mimesis, catharsis, tragic pity Introduction “Tragedy” and “the tragic” are notoriously slippery terms both in historical and colloquial usage. Over the centuries “tragedy” has been employed to indicate, on the one hand, a genre of ancient drama – one depicting flawed human characters struggling heroically against the leviathan forces of cosmic necessity (in the form of abject suffering, death, etc.) – and, on the other hand, commonly today, a catastrophic event catching observers by utter surprise and upending their sense of cosmic stability and justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Thales of Miletus Sources and Interpretations Miletli Thales Kaynaklar Ve Yorumlar
    Thales of Miletus Sources and Interpretations Miletli Thales Kaynaklar ve Yorumlar David Pierce October , Matematics Department Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University Istanbul http://mat.msgsu.edu.tr/~dpierce/ Preface Here are notes of what I have been able to find or figure out about Thales of Miletus. They may be useful for anybody interested in Thales. They are not an essay, though they may lead to one. I focus mainly on the ancient sources that we have, and on the mathematics of Thales. I began this work in preparation to give one of several - minute talks at the Thales Meeting (Thales Buluşması) at the ruins of Miletus, now Milet, September , . The talks were in Turkish; the audience were from the general popu- lation. I chose for my title “Thales as the originator of the concept of proof” (Kanıt kavramının öncüsü olarak Thales). An English draft is in an appendix. The Thales Meeting was arranged by the Tourism Research Society (Turizm Araştırmaları Derneği, TURAD) and the office of the mayor of Didim. Part of Aydın province, the district of Didim encompasses the ancient cities of Priene and Miletus, along with the temple of Didyma. The temple was linked to Miletus, and Herodotus refers to it under the name of the family of priests, the Branchidae. I first visited Priene, Didyma, and Miletus in , when teaching at the Nesin Mathematics Village in Şirince, Selçuk, İzmir. The district of Selçuk contains also the ruins of Eph- esus, home town of Heraclitus. In , I drafted my Miletus talk in the Math Village. Since then, I have edited and added to these notes.
    [Show full text]