DOCSLIB.ORG

Mandate M/487 to Establish Security Standards Final Report Phase 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mandate M/487 to Establish Security Standards Final Report Phase 2 In assignment of: European Commission DG Enterprise and Industry Security Research and Development Mandate M/487 to Establish Security Standards Final Report Phase 2 Proposed standardization work programmes and road maps NEN Industry P.O. Box 5059 2600 GB Delft Vlinderweg 6 2623 AX Delft The Netherlands T +31 15 2690135 F +31 15 2690207 [email protected] www.nen.nl Netherlands Standardization Institute M/487 has been accepted by the European Standards Organizations (ESOs). The work has been allocated to CEN/TC 391 ‘Societal and Citizen Security’ whose secretariat is provided by the Netherlands Standardization Institute (NEN). Mandate M/487 to Establish Security Standards Final Report Phase 2 Proposed standardization work programmes and road maps REPORT VERSION REPORT DATE Final report 05-07-2013 The copyright on this document produced in the Although the utmost care has been taken with framework of M/487 response, consisting of this publication, errors and omissions cannot be contributions from CEN/TC 391 and other security entirely excluded. The European Committee for stakeholders shall remain the exclusive property of Standardization (CEN) and/or the members of CEN and/or CENELEC and/ or ETSI in any and all the committees therefore accept no liability, not countries. even for direct or indirect damage, occurring due to or in relation with the application of publications issued by the European Committee for Standardization (CEN). Contents Page Executive summary ............................................................................................................................................ 6 1 Introduction and objective.................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Context ................................................................................................................................................... 8 1.2 Objectives .............................................................................................................................................. 9 1.3 Scope .................................................................................................................................................... 10 1.4 How to read the document ................................................................................................................. 10 2 Process ................................................................................................................................................. 11 2.1 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................ 11 2.2 Selection criteria .................................................................................................................................. 12 2.3 European standardization .................................................................................................................. 12 3 Results .................................................................................................................................................. 16 3.1 General conclusions ........................................................................................................................... 16 3.2 Results of the Border Security Survey.............................................................................................. 18 3.2.1 General ................................................................................................................................................. 18 3.2.2 Current Standardization Landscape .................................................................................................. 19 3.2.3 Stakeholders ........................................................................................................................................ 20 3.2.4 Workshop ............................................................................................................................................. 21 3.2.5 Standardization roadmaps ................................................................................................................. 21 3.2.6 Results and recommendations .......................................................................................................... 27 3.3 Results of Crisis Management: .......................................................................................................... 28 3.3.1 General ................................................................................................................................................. 28 3.3.2 Standardization needs ........................................................................................................................ 29 3.3.3 Workshop ............................................................................................................................................. 36 3.3.4 Standardization roadmaps ................................................................................................................. 36 3.3.5 Results and recommendations .......................................................................................................... 37 3.4 Results of CBRNE ............................................................................................................................... 45 3.4.1 General ................................................................................................................................................. 45 3.4.2 Stakeholders and standardization landscape .................................................................................. 46 3.4.3 Workshop ............................................................................................................................................. 46 3.4.4 Standardization needs and gaps ....................................................................................................... 47 3.4.5 Roadmaps ............................................................................................................................................ 50 4 Follow up and introduction to the annexes ...................................................................................... 58 4.1 Follow-up .............................................................................................................................................. 58 4.2 Description of the annexes ................................................................................................................ 59 5 Bibliography ......................................................................................................................................... 60 Annex A (Informative) List of abbreviations ................................................................................................. 61 Annex B (Informative) Border Security ......................................................................................................... 63 B.1 Existing standards .............................................................................................................................. 63 B.2 Workshop ............................................................................................................................................. 71 B.3 Overview of Automated Border Control (ABC) .............................................................................. 103 Annex C (Informative) Crisis management ................................................................................................. 105 C.1 Existing standards ............................................................................................................................ 105 C.2 Workshop ........................................................................................................................................... 108 Annex D (Informative) CBRNE ..................................................................................................................... 115 D.1 Existing standards ............................................................................................................................ 115 D.2 Workshop ........................................................................................................................................... 116 D.3 Stakeholderanalysis CBRNE ............................................................................................................ 123 4 5 Executive summary Mandate M/487 was performed in order to analyse the existing security standardization landscape, select priority sectors and develop standardization roadmaps for three selected security sectors to support EU policy on security. • Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear and Explosives (CBRNE); • Border Security – automated border control systems (ABC), as well as biometric identifiers; • Crisis Management/Civil Protection –communication interoperability and interoperability of command and control, including organizational interoperability, as well as mass notification of the population. The work on Mandate M/487 was led by CEN TC 391 Societal and Citizen Security of which secretariat is ensured NEN (Dutch National Standardization Body). For each of the three sectors an internationally recognized expert was assigned to support the work. For each of the sectors a two day workshop was organised at which standardization proposals were discussed that had been collected
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Best Practices on Public Warning Systems for Climate-Induced
    Best practices on Public Warning Systems for Climate-Induced Natural Hazards Abstract: This study presents an overview of the Public Warning System, focusing on approaches, technical standards and communication systems related to the generation and the public sharing of early warnings. The analysis focuses on the definition of a set of best practices and guidelines to implement an effective public warning system that can be deployed at multiple geographic scales, from local communities up to the national and also transboundary level. Finally, a set of recommendations are provided to support decision makers in upgrading the national Public Warning System and to help policy makers in outlining future directives. Authors: Claudio Rossi Giacomo Falcone Antonella Frisiello Fabrizio Dominici Version: 30 September 2018 Table of Contents List of Figures .................................................................................................................................. 2 List of Tables ................................................................................................................................... 4 Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Core Definitions .............................................................................................................................. 7 1. Introduction .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Your Gateway to International Standards #111
    #111 focusYour gateway to International Standards when disasters strike #111 2 Being prepared : Yucun Village Committee 20 for the unprepared Photo Comment by Thomas Idermark. 4 Social feed Taking a cue from leaders who tweet. ISO focus 6 Mainstreaming disaster 32 28 July-August 2015 management Having the right tools can prepare us for life’s deadliest hazards. 14 Charting the road to resilience How ISO/TC 292 plans to safeguard our : Rory Hunter, AusAID : Rory Hunter, communities. : Asian Development Bank Development : Asian Photo Photo 20 Disasters... be prepared ! The broad panorama of ISO standards. ISOfocus July-August 2015 – ISSN 2226-1095 22 Crisis management ISOfocus, the magazine of the International Organization for Standardization, without borders is published six times a year. You can discover more content on our Website at iso.org/isofocus, or by staying connected with us on : Christian Friis Bach talks UNECE strategy. 28 Microsoft gives users TWITTER FACEBOOK googleplusYoutubeFlickrlinkedin confidence to move Director of Marketing, Communication and Information | Nicolas Fleury to the cloud Head of Communication and Content Strategy | Katie Bird Making a pledge for cloud privacy Editor-in-Chief | Elizabeth Gasiorowski-Denis with ISO/IEC 27018. Editors | Maria Lazarte, Sandrine Tranchard 14 6 32 High standards for Anji County Copy editor and Proofreader | Vivienne Rojas Contributing writers | Xinyu Hua, Dong Li, Clare Naden, Erick Stephens Why standards are the answer Designers | Xela Damond, Pierre Granier, Alexane Rosa to a beautiful China. : MSB Translators | Cécile Nicole Jeannet, Anita Rochedy, Catherine Vincent 40 Protecting digital consumers Subscriptions and back issues Photo Big Brother is watching you… and using If you enjoy ISOfocus, you can subscribe and download the pdf for free, or purchase single hard-copy issues through our Website iso.org/isofocus.
    [Show full text]
  • Deliverable D2.1 State-Of-The-Art Analysis
    Deliverable D2.1 State-of-the-Art Analysis Grant agreement number: 740872 Due date of Deliverable: 31/10/2017 Start date of the project: 1 May 2017 Actual submission date: 27/10/2017 Duration: 24 months Deliverable approved by the CO: ☒ Lead Beneficiary: Friedrich Steinhäusler, ISCC Contributing Beneficiaries: Matts Ahlsén, CNet Hanna Burkow, THW Georgios Eftychidis, KEMEA Stanley Greenstein, SU George Kowalczyk, PHE Rod McCall / Ulrich Leopold, LIST Stefanie Müller, DIN Abstract Crisis managers, working in a fast-paced and mobile environment, need timely access to the latest information and intelligence and decision support tools to filter the most important information information. A key element in successful crisis management (CM) is comprehensive Situational Awareness (SA) among all stakeholders involved. This report identifies the user needs and requirements of the future EU Multi- Stakeholder Situational Awareness System (MSSAS), based on dedicated international research results and survey-based data on SA systems used by EU crisis managers. The state-of-the-art research revealed a multiplicity of ready-to-use, mostly commercial-off-the-shelve (COTS), tools providing SA. These tools fall into the following categories: Satellite- and Airborne Remote Sensing Systems, Unmanned Ground Vehicles, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, Special Cameras, Special Detectors, Traffic Management and Decision Support Systems. In addition to these COTS tools, the report identifies EU FP7 projects on the development of advanced SA solutions supported by the European Commission with over € 100 million. This state-of-the-art analysis addresses also different models with regard to SA pertinent ICT architecture and technologies. An overview is provided for existing standards and ongoing standardisation activities, identifying the most important such standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Plan for Information Security Vyshnavi Jorrigala St
    St. Cloud State University theRepository at St. Cloud State Culminating Projects in Information Assurance Department of Information Systems 12-2017 Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Plan for Information Security Vyshnavi Jorrigala St. Cloud State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/msia_etds Recommended Citation Jorrigala, Vyshnavi, "Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Plan for Information Security" (2017). Culminating Projects in Information Assurance. 44. https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/msia_etds/44 This Starred Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Information Systems at theRepository at St. Cloud State. It has been accepted for inclusion in Culminating Projects in Information Assurance by an authorized administrator of theRepository at St. Cloud State. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Plan for Information Security by Vyshnavi Devi Jorrigala A Starred Paper Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Saint Cloud State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree, of Master of Science in Information Assurance December, 2018 Starred Paper Committee: Susantha Herath, Chairperson Dien D. Phan Balasubramanian Kasi 2 Abstract Business continuity planning and Disaster recovery planning are the most crucial elements of a business but are often ignored. Businesses must make a well-structured plan and document for disaster recovery and business continuation, even before a catastrophe occurs. Disasters can be short or may last for a long time, but when an organization is ready for any adversity, it thrives hard and survives. This paper will clearly distinguish the difference between disaster recovery plan and business continuity plan, will describe the components of each plan and finally, will provide an approach that organizations can follow to make better contingency plan so that they will not go out of business when something unexpected happens.
    [Show full text]
  • Document Number Title Most Recent Publication Date Scope Sector 1 Sector 2 Sector 3 Sector 4 Contents
    Document Number Title Most Recent Scope Sector 1 Sector 2 Sector 3 Sector 4 Contents Publication Date ARINC 654 ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN 9/12/1994 Refers electromagnetic Transportation Systems 1.0 INTRODUCTION GUIDELINES FOR compatibility, shielding, 1.1 Objectives INTEGRATED MODULAR thermal management, 1.2 Scope AVIONICS PACKAGING AND vibration and shock of IMA 1.3 References INTERFACES systems. Emphasis is placed 2.0 VIBRATION AND SHOCK both on the design of IMA 2.1 Introduction components and their 2.2 Vibration and Shock Isolation electrical, optical and electro- 3.0 THERMAL CONSIDERATIONS mechanical interfaces. 3.1 Thermal Management 3.1.1 Electronic System Thermal Design Objectives 3.1.2 Design Condition Definitions 3.1.3 Air Flow 3.1.4 Fully Enclosed and Flow- Through Cooling 3.1.5 Thermal Design Conditions 3.1.6 Cooling Hole Sizes - Limit Cases 3.2 Electronic Parts Application 3.3 Ambient Temperatures 3.4 Equipment Sidewall Temperature 3.5 LRM Thermal Appraisal 3.6 Thermal Interface Information 3.7 Materials for Thermal Design 4.0 DESIGN LIFE 4.1 Operational Design Life 4.2 Failure Modes ARINC 666 ITEM 7.0 Encryption and 2002 Information Technology f l/ Authentication ATIS 0300100 IP NETWORK DISASTER 1/12/2009 Pertains to enumerate Information Technology Emergency Services RECOVERY FRAMEWORK potential proactive or automatic policy-driven network traffic management actions that should be performed prior to, during, and immediately following disaster conditions. ATIS 0300202 Internetwork Operations 1/11/2009 Describes the cooperative Information Technology Emergency Services communications Guidelines for Network network management Management of the Public actions (that may be) Telecommunications required of interconnected Networks under Disaster network operators during Conditions emergency conditions associated with disasters that threaten life or property and case congestion in the public telecommunications networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Relevant Standards Which Was Conducted by Using the Standards Database Perinorm [2]
    D6.1 EXISTING STANDARDS AND STANDARDIZATION ACTIVITIES REPORT. SMART MATURE RESILIENCE D6.1 EXISTING STANDARDS AND STANDARDIZATION ACTIVITIES REPORT DIN | 31/05/2016 www.smr-project.eu 1 D6.1 EXISTING STANDARDS AND STANDARDIZATION ACTIVITIES REPORT. Existing standards and standardization activities report Deliverable no. D6.1 Work package WP6 Dissemination Level Public Author (s) René Lindner and Bernhard Kempen (DIN) Co-author(s) Maider Sainz (TECNUN) Date 31/05/2016 File Name D6.1.SMR_Existing_standards_report Revision Reviewed by (if Jose J. Gonzalez (CIEM), Torbjørg Træland Meum (CIEM), Jaziar applicable) Radianti (CIEM), Vasileios P. Latinos (ICLEI) This document has been prepared in the framework of the European project SMR – SMART MATURE RESILIENCE. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme under Grant Agreement no. 653569. The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the European Union. Neither the REA nor the European Commission is responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. Funded by the Horizon 2020 programme of the European Union www.smr-project.eu 2 D6.1 EXISTING STANDARDS AND STANDARDIZATION ACTIVITIES REPORT. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The aim of this report is to disseminate knowledge about relevant existing standards and standardization activities amongst project partners and to support the awareness rising of possible missing standards. Thus this document will show the current resilience and Smart City standardization landscape, specifically taken into consideration the security aspects, and will list and briefly assess the standards relevant for this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Iso/Tc292 規格開発状況（2021 年 6 月）
    ISO/TC292 規格開発状況（2021 年 6 月） 注：オレンジ色のハイライトは，日本提案案件 WG 規格番号 タイトル 現在のステータス 備 考 ISO/TR 22312:2011 Societal security — Technological capabilities 1 ISO 22300:2021 Security and resilience — Vocabulary 発行済み 2 ISO 22301:2019 Security and resilience — Business continuity 発行済み JIS Q 22301:2020 management systems — Requirements セキュリティ及びレジリエンス―事業継続マネジメント 更なる参考書 システム―要求事項 外部リンク（ISO） 2 ISO 22313:2020 Security and resilience — Business continuity 発行済み JIS Q22313 改正中 management systems — Guidance on the use of ISO 22301 2 ISO 22316:2017 Security and resilience — Organizational resilience — 発行済み Principles and attributes 2 ISO/TS 22317:2015 Societal security -- Business continuity management 発行済み 改定中（今夏発行予定） systems -- Guidelines for business impact analysis (BIA) 1 2 ISO/TS 22318:2015 Societal security — Business continuity management 発行済み 改定中（今夏発行予定） systems — Guidelines for supply chain continuity 2 ISO/TS 22330:2018 Security and resilience — Business continuity 発行済み management systems — Guidelines for people aspects of business continuity 2 ISO/TS 22331:2018 Security and resilience — Business continuity 発行済み management systems — Guidelines for business continuity strategy 2 ISO/TS 22332:2021 Security and resilience — Business continuity 発行済み management systems — Guidance for developing business continuity procedures CASCO ISO/IEC 17021-6 Conformity assessment — Requirements for bodies 定期見直し実施中 providing audit and certification of management (ISO/CASCO主導) systems — Part 6: Competence requirements for auditing and certification of business continuity
    [Show full text]
  • KRITIS-Normen-Matrix, Stand 2021-07-14
    KRITIS-Normen-Matrix, Stand 2021-07-14 KRITIS-Sektor Informations- Transport Finanz- und Medien Norm zuständiges Gremium/Titel der Norm technik/ Staat und Energie und Gesundheit Wasser Ernährung Versiche- und Telekom- Verwaltung Verkehr rungswesen Kultur munikation DIN-Normenausschuss Feuerwehrwesen (FNFW) NA 031-05-02 AA Organisations- und Steuerungsnormen für den Bevölkerungsschutz DIN CEN/TS 17091:2019-01 Krisenmanagement - Strategische Grundsätze DIN EN ISO 22300:2021-06 Sicherheit und Resilienz - Begriffe Sicherheit und Resilienz - Business Continuity Management DIN EN ISO 22301:2020-06 System - Anforderungen Sicherheit und Resilienz - Business Continuity Management DIN EN ISO 22313:2020-10 System - Anleitung zur Verwendung von ISO 22301 Sicherheit und Schutz des Gemeinwesens - DIN EN ISO 22315:2018-12 Massenevakuierung - Leitfaden für die Planung Sicherheit und Resilienz - Resilienz der Gesellschaft - E DIN EN ISO 22319:2021-02 Leitfaden für die Planung der Einbindung spontaner freiwilliger Helfer Sicherheit und Resilienz - Gefahrenabwehr - Leitfaden für die Organisation der Gefahrenabwehr bei DIN ISO 22320:2019-07 Schadensereignissen Sicherheit und Schutz des Gemeinwesens - ISO 22322:2015-05 Gefahrenabwehr - System zur Warnung der Öffentlichkeit Sicherheit und Resilienz - Gefahrenabwehr - Leitfaden für die Nutzung sozialer Medien im ISO/DIS 22329:2020-12 Gefahrenabwehrmanagement Krisenmanagement: Leitlinien für die Entwicklung einer ISO/CD 22361 Strategie Security and resilience - Community resilience - Guidelines ISO/TS 22393
    [Show full text]
  • ISO Committee on Consumer Policy (COPOLCO) 38Th Meeting Geneva, Switzerland 17 June 2016
    ISO Committee on consumer policy (COPOLCO) 38th meeting Geneva, Switzerland 17 June 2016 Working documents 1 AGENDA ITEM 1 WELCOME AND OPENING OF THE MEETING 2 AGENDA ITEM 2 ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA 3 COPOLCO N203/2016 DRAFT AGENDA FOR THE 38TH MEETING OF COPOLCO 17 June 2016 – Mövenpick Hotel, Geneva, Switzerland, starting at 9:00 Item Document Action Rapporteur R. Nadarajan, 1. Welcome and opening of the meeting - N SNV representative, K. McKinley 2. Adoption of the agenda N203 C R. Nadarajan 3. Key developments across ISO: Oral report Strategies and programmes TMB – issues/updates on standards development C environment and stakeholder engagement O. Peyrat – DEVCO/Academy events CASCO – issues and events Tabling of the minutes of the 37th COPOLCO meeting 4. held in Geneva on 14 May 2015 N184 C R. Nadarajan Chair’s and Secretary's reports on items not otherwise R. Nadarajan 5. N204 C covered in the agenda D.Kissinger-Matray New work items and issues – general matters Raising the profile of consumer interests in the ISO system R. Devi Nadarajan 6. N205 D (awareness and capacity building) D. Kissinger-Matray 7. Strategy implementation for ISO/COPOLCO N206 D R. Devi Nadarajan R. Nadarajan 8. 2016 workshop – Results and follow-up actions N207 D K. McKinley A. Pindar 9. Consumer priorities in standardization on services N208 D Liu Chengyang New work items and issues – working groups A. Pindar 10 Revision of ISO/IEC Guide 76 N209 D Liu Chengyang M. Murvold 11. Key areas working group N210 D T. Nakakuki Consumer protection in the global marketplace working 12.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Government Publishing Office Style Manual
    Style Manual An official guide to the form and style of Federal Government publishing | 2016 Keeping America Informed | OFFICIAL | DIGITAL | SECURE [email protected] Production and Distribution Notes This publication was typeset electronically using Helvetica and Minion Pro typefaces. It was printed using vegetable oil-based ink on recycled paper containing 30% post consumer waste. The GPO Style Manual will be distributed to libraries in the Federal Depository Library Program. To find a depository library near you, please go to the Federal depository library directory at http://catalog.gpo.gov/fdlpdir/public.jsp. The electronic text of this publication is available for public use free of charge at https://www.govinfo.gov/gpo-style-manual. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: United States. Government Publishing Office, author. Title: Style manual : an official guide to the form and style of federal government publications / U.S. Government Publishing Office. Other titles: Official guide to the form and style of federal government publications | Also known as: GPO style manual Description: 2016; official U.S. Government edition. | Washington, DC : U.S. Government Publishing Office, 2016. | Includes index. Identifiers: LCCN 2016055634| ISBN 9780160936029 (cloth) | ISBN 0160936020 (cloth) | ISBN 9780160936012 (paper) | ISBN 0160936012 (paper) Subjects: LCSH: Printing—United States—Style manuals. | Printing, Public—United States—Handbooks, manuals, etc. | Publishers and publishing—United States—Handbooks, manuals, etc. | Authorship—Style manuals. | Editing—Handbooks, manuals, etc. Classification: LCC Z253 .U58 2016 | DDC 808/.02—dc23 | SUDOC GP 1.23/4:ST 9/2016 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016055634 Use of ISBN Prefix This is the official U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • How Standards Contribute to Business Resilience in Crisis Situations
    Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt INTERNATIONAL Braunschweig und Berlin National Metrology Institute COOPERATION Current Situation How Standards Contribute to Business Resilience in Crisis Situations Niels Ferdinand, Richard Prem On behalf of the Federal Government of Germany, the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt promotes the improvement of the framework conditions for economic, social and environmentally friendly action and thus supports the development of quality infrastructure. 2 CONTENTS 1. Background 4 2. The significance of standards on increasing business resilience 4 2.1. Defining resilience and business continuity management 4 2.2. Fields of action for increasing business resilience 5 2.3. The correlation between standardisation and business resilience 5 2.4. Risk management in standardisation 7 3. Specific standards for resilience and business continuity management 8 3.1. Topic overview for specific standards 8 3.2. Effectiveness of standards in social and economic crises 10 Abbreviations 11 References 12 An overview of existing standards, specifically in regard to business resilience 14 E-Learning resources 21 Notes 22 3 1. BacKgroUND 1. Background The global corona virus crisis is presenting enormous This paper summarises the current state of affairs of challenges for companies worldwide. Companies in de- standardisation in the area of business resilience. It will veloping and emerging nations are especially affected, as explain the general contributions standardisation can the crisis has severe ramifications for them, and they have make towards promoting resilience. On this basis, it will less access to support. This raises the question of how we give an overview to specific standards relevant to busi- can use standardisation to improve the resilience of com- ness resilience.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 4, No. 4, April 2013, ISSN 2226-1095
    a Volume 4, No. 4, April 2013, ISSN 2226-1095 YOU a #contents #me #me Me ? – Why should I care ? ........................................................................................... 1 Me ? #worldscene ISO Focus+ is published 10 times a year International events and international standardization ............................................... 2 (single issues : July-August, Why should I care ? November-December). #guestinterview It is available in English and French. By you .......................................................................................................................... 3 www.iso.org/isofocus+ You may be wondering why you about them because they are sources need to learn about standards. There’s ISO Update : www.iso.org/isoupdate #you of international best practice no denying they are a good idea, but and can open up doors to global The electronic edition (PDF file) of For you ........................................................................................................................ 8 ISO Focus+ is accessible free of charge it’s the experts’ job to deal with them, markets. on the ISO Website www.iso.org/isofocus+ #fun | Adventure tourism – More excitement, less risk ............................................... 10 right ? Wrong. Standards concern us 3. You should get involved. An annual subscription to the paper edition all. Why ? Because we are the ultimate costs 38 Swiss francs. #fun | Roller-coaster thrills – Amusement for all ages without danger ........................ 12 You have the
    [Show full text]