DOCSLIB.ORG

Montgomery to Mobile Passenger Rail Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Montgomery to Mobile Passenger Rail Study Birmingham-Montgomery-Mobile Intercity Passenger Rail Feasibility Study January 2020 U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration Birmingham-Montgomery-Mobile Intercity Phase II: Montgomery to Mobile Passenger Rail Feasibility Study Page Intentionally Left Blank Birmingham-Montgomery-Mobile Intercity Phase II: Montgomery to Mobile Passenger Rail Feasibility Study Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................................... vi 1.0 Study Overview ...................................................................................................................................................... vi 2.0 Public Involvement Program ................................................................................................................................ vi 3.0 Baseline Conditions ............................................................................................................................................... vi 4.0 Alternatives Development ................................................................................................................................... vii 5.0 Demand and Revenue Estimation ..................................................................................................................... viii 6.0 Capital and O&M Cost Estimation ..................................................................................................................... viii 7.0 Cost-Benefit Evaluation ......................................................................................................................................... ix 8.0 System Planning and Assessment ........................................................................................................................ x 1. Study Overview ...............................................................................................................................................1 -1 1.1 Background .....................................................................................................................................................1 -1 1.2 Passenger Rail Service in Alabama ..............................................................................................................1 -1 1.3 Goals and Objectives .....................................................................................................................................1 -3 1.4 Phase I Study – Birmingham to Montgomery .............................................................................................1 -4 1.4.1 Alternative Development ....................................................................................................................1-4 1.4.2 Demand and Revenue Estimation .....................................................................................................1-4 1.4.3 Capital and Operating Cost Estimation .............................................................................................1-5 1.4.4 Cost and Benefit Evaluation ...............................................................................................................1-6 2. Public Involvement Program.........................................................................................................................2 -1 2.1 Purpose of Public Involvement ....................................................................................................................2 -1 2.2 Public Involvement Goals ..............................................................................................................................2 -1 2.3 Public Involvement Plan ................................................................................................................................2 -1 2.3.1 Summary of Public Involvement Activities .......................................................................................2-1 2.4 Public Involvement Meetings ........................................................................................................................2 -2 2.4.1 Round One – November 2018 ...........................................................................................................2-2 2.4.2 Round Two – April-May 2019 .............................................................................................................2-2 2.5 Public Survey ..................................................................................................................................................2 -2 2.5.1 Public Survey Questions .....................................................................................................................2-2 2.5.2 Public Survey Responses ....................................................................................................................2-4 3. Baseline Conditions .......................................................................................................................................3 -1 3.1 Study Corridor ................................................................................................................................................3 -1 3.2 Railroad Characteristics ................................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.3 Highway Characteristics ................................................................................................................................3 -1 3.3.1 Interstate 65 .........................................................................................................................................3-1 3.3.2 US 31 .....................................................................................................................................................3-1 3.4 Transit Service.................................................................................................................................................3 -2 3.4.1 Intercity Transportation Services .......................................................................................................3-2 3.4.2 Montgomery Transit Service ..............................................................................................................3-2 3.4.3 Mobile Transit Service .........................................................................................................................3-2 3.5 Demographics ................................................................................................................................................3 -3 3.5.1 Study Area Population Trends ...........................................................................................................3-3 3.5.2 Environmental Justice Communities .................................................................................................3-4 3.5.3 Employment Trends ............................................................................................................................3-4 i Phase II Montgomery to Mobile Passenger Rail Feasibility Study Birmingham-Montgomery-Mobile Intercity Phase II: Montgomery to Mobile Passenger Rail Feasibility Study 4. Alternatives Development.............................................................................................................................4 -1 4.1 Development of Alternatives ........................................................................................................................4 -1 4.2 Potential Station Locations ...........................................................................................................................4 -3 4.2.1 Proposed Montgomery Station .........................................................................................................4-5 4.2.2 Proposed Greenville Station ..............................................................................................................4-5 4.2.3 Proposed Atmore Station ...................................................................................................................4-7 4.2.4 Proposed Mobile Station ....................................................................................................................4-9 4.2.5 Other Potential Station Locations .................................................................................................. 4-10 4.3 Preliminary Service Schedule .................................................................................................................... 4-10 4.3.1 Alternative 1 ...................................................................................................................................... 4-11 4.3.1.1 Alternative 1a ............................................................................................................................ 4-11 4.3.1.2 Alternative 1b ............................................................................................................................ 4-12 4.3.1.3 Alternative 1c ............................................................................................................................. 4-12 4.3.2 Alternative 2 ...................................................................................................................................... 4-13 4.3.2.1 Alternative 2a ...........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GAO-02-398 Intercity Passenger Rail: Amtrak Needs to Improve Its
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Honorable Ron Wyden GAO U.S. Senate April 2002 INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL Amtrak Needs to Improve Its Decisionmaking Process for Its Route and Service Proposals GAO-02-398 Contents Letter 1 Results in Brief 2 Background 3 Status of the Growth Strategy 6 Amtrak Overestimated Expected Mail and Express Revenue 7 Amtrak Encountered Substantial Difficulties in Expanding Service Over Freight Railroad Tracks 9 Conclusions 13 Recommendation for Executive Action 13 Agency Comments and Our Evaluation 13 Scope and Methodology 16 Appendix I Financial Performance of Amtrak’s Routes, Fiscal Year 2001 18 Appendix II Amtrak Route Actions, January 1995 Through December 2001 20 Appendix III Planned Route and Service Actions Included in the Network Growth Strategy 22 Appendix IV Amtrak’s Process for Evaluating Route and Service Proposals 23 Amtrak’s Consideration of Operating Revenue and Direct Costs 23 Consideration of Capital Costs and Other Financial Issues 24 Appendix V Market-Based Network Analysis Models Used to Estimate Ridership, Revenues, and Costs 26 Models Used to Estimate Ridership and Revenue 26 Models Used to Estimate Costs 27 Page i GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking Appendix VI Comments from the National Railroad Passenger Corporation 28 GAO’s Evaluation 37 Tables Table 1: Status of Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions, as of December 31, 2001 7 Table 2: Operating Profit (Loss), Operating Ratio, and Profit (Loss) per Passenger of Each Amtrak Route, Fiscal Year 2001, Ranked by Profit (Loss) 18 Table 3: Planned Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions 22 Figure Figure 1: Amtrak’s Route System, as of December 2001 4 Page ii GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 April 12, 2002 The Honorable Ron Wyden United States Senate Dear Senator Wyden: The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) is the nation’s intercity passenger rail operator.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT of INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION in Re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMEN
    USDC IN/ND case 3:05-md-00527-RLM-MGG document 3279 filed 03/22/19 page 1 of 354 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION ) Case No. 3:05-MD-527 RLM In re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE ) (MDL 1700) SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMENT ) PRACTICES LITIGATION ) ) ) THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ) ) Carlene Craig, et. al. v. FedEx Case No. 3:05-cv-530 RLM ) Ground Package Systems, Inc., ) ) PROPOSED FINAL APPROVAL ORDER This matter came before the Court for hearing on March 11, 2019, to consider final approval of the proposed ERISA Class Action Settlement reached by and between Plaintiffs Leo Rittenhouse, Jeff Bramlage, Lawrence Liable, Kent Whistler, Mike Moore, Keith Berry, Matthew Cook, Heidi Law, Sylvia O’Brien, Neal Bergkamp, and Dominic Lupo1 (collectively, “the Named Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and the Certified Class, and Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (“FXG”) (collectively, “the Parties”), the terms of which Settlement are set forth in the Class Action Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) attached as Exhibit A to the Joint Declaration of Co-Lead Counsel in support of Preliminary Approval of the Kansas Class Action 1 Carlene Craig withdrew as a Named Plaintiff on November 29, 2006. See MDL Doc. No. 409. Named Plaintiffs Ronald Perry and Alan Pacheco are not movants for final approval and filed an objection [MDL Doc. Nos. 3251/3261]. USDC IN/ND case 3:05-md-00527-RLM-MGG document 3279 filed 03/22/19 page 2 of 354 Settlement [MDL Doc. No. 3154-1]. Also before the Court is ERISA Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Attorney’s Fees and for Payment of Service Awards to the Named Plaintiffs, filed with the Court on October 19, 2018 [MDL Doc.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Security Disclosure
    MUNICIPAL SECURITY DISCLOSURE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2019 For the City of Miami Beach, Florida and The Miami Beach Redevelopment Agency (A Component Unit of the City of Miami Beach, Florida) MUNICIPAL SECURITY DISCLOSURE City of Miami Beach, Florida For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2019 Prepared by: The City of Miami Beach Finance Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida • 33139 Tel: (305) 673 – 7466 • Fax: (305) 673 – 7795 Last updated July 13, 2020 City of Miami Beach, Florida Report of Annual Financial Information For Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2019 This Report of Annual Financial Information is being filed with the Electronic Municipal Market Access (EMMA), a service of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB). The following is a list of all outstanding bonds and other obligations for the City of Miami Beach at September 30, 2019, in accordance with provisions regarding continuing disclosure set forth in: Outstanding Bonds Original Description Resolution Resolution Commitment Amount Number Date Date $22,500,000 Gulf Breeze Fixed Rate Loan, Series 1985E No. 2001-24500 June 26, 2001 August 1, 2001 (used to repay a portion of the outstanding principal from the Sunshine State Loan and renovation and improvement of two City owned golf courses and their related facilities), (“2001 Gulf Breeze Loan”) $62,465,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2003 (used No. 2003-25240 June 11, 2003 July 22, 2003 to improve neighborhood infrastructure in the City, consisting of streetscape and traffic calming measures, shoreline stabilization, Fire Safety Projects and Beaches Projects) (Note: The outstanding balance on the above City of Miami Beach, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2003 were fully refunded by the Series 2019 bonds at September 30, 2019.) $13,590,000 Water and Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Gulf Coast Working Group Report to Congress
    Gulf Coast Working Group Report to Congress Prepared for: Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives Submitted by: The Gulf Coast Working Group Final Report July 2017 Table of Contents 1 OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................................. 1 2 BACKGROUND AND HISTORY ................................................................................................. 1 2.1 DESCRIPTION OF GCWG SCOPE OF WORK ...................................................................... 1 2.1.1 THE FAST ACT AND RESPONSE TO CONGRESS ............................................................... 1 2.1.2 GOALS .............................................................................................................................. 2 2.1.3 REPORT ORGANIZATION .................................................................................................. 2 2.2 HISTORY .......................................................................................................................... 2 2.2.1 PREVIOUS PASSENGER RAIL SERVICE TO THE GULF COAST ........................................... 2 2.2.2 RECENT HISTORY OF LOCAL SUPPORT TO RESTORE PASSENGER SERVICE .................... 4 2.3 REGIONAL ECONOMIC SUMMARY .................................................................................... 4 2.3.1 POTENTIAL ECONOMIC BENEFITS ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Panhandle Birding Trail
    The Great Florida Birding Trail is a project of the Florida Fish and Wildlife PANHANDLE FLORIDA Conservation Commission BIRDING TRAIL In partnership with : Wildlife Foundation of Florida U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Florida Park Service Florida Department of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Many thanks to our generous sponsors : www.gulfpower.com The Great Florida Birding Trail www.nfwf.org www.FloridaBirdingTrail.com 05/06 Printed on recycled paper Getting Started... Ciity Locator Loaner optics are available free of charge at all Gateways, as well as at City Map City Map additional sites as marked in the site Apalachicola I Laguna Beach G descriptions! Bristol J Marianna F Carrabelle I Mexico Beach H Chattahoochee J Milton C Trail Tips Chipley F Panama City G When birding: Crawfordville M Pensacola B Crestview C Port St. Joe H • Take sunscreen, water and bug spray. De Funiak Springs E Quincy K • Make reservations in advance for "by-appointment Destin D Sopchoppy M only" sites. Ft. Walton Beach D St. Marks M • Check seasonality of site; are you visiting at the Grayton Beach D Sumatra I right time of year? Gulf Beach A Tallahassee L Gulf Breeze B Birder Vocabulary Some words used in this guide are specific to bird- How were these sites selected? ers and birdwatching. Bone-up on the following lingo Each of the sites in this guide was chosen for its bird- so you’ll blend in at your next birding dinner party! watching characteristics, accessibility and ability to Birding by ear: the ability to identify birds by their withstand birder use.
    [Show full text]
  • Gulf Islands National Seashore National Park Service Gulf Islands Florida and Mississippi U.S
    Gulf Islands National Seashore National Park Service Gulf Islands Florida and Mississippi U.S. Department of the Interior Treasures Along the Gulf Coast NPS Gulf Islands National Seashore is a place of many riches—blue- of white sand carried seaward by rivers draining from the Appa- purpose of cultivating live oaks, used for shipbuilding. To help How Barrier Islands Change green, sparkling waters, magnificent white beaches, and fertile lachian Mountains. During violent storms the islands function as defend the mainland against foreign invasion, the government All theories about the barrier islands’ formation involve waves, coastal marshes. It stretches 160 miles along the northern coast barriers, blocking ocean waves that would otherwise strike the began fortifying Pensacola in 1829, and Ship Island, Mississippi, winds, and fluctuating sea levels. The islands move steadily of the Gulf of Mexico in Florida and Mississippi, and includes mainland with greater force. in 1859. From Ship Island’s Fort Massachusetts the Union Army westward as longshore currents wear away their eastern ends barrier islands, maritime forests, historic forts, bayous, and staged the capture of New Orleans in 1862. By the end of the and build up the western ends. Shifting winds sculpt the dunes. marine habitat. Evidence of the American Indians who settled in the forests and Civil War new inventions like rifled cannon and ironclad warships Storms also alter islands’ shapes when waves wash over the sur- marshes helps archeologists understand the native peoples’ long called for new defenses. The US Army Coast Artillery Corps built faces and rearrange sand. Such constant changes are slowed Congress established the national seashore in 1971 to protect history.
    [Show full text]
  • South Santa Rosa Bicycle-Pedestrian Plan
    South Santa Rosa Bicycle-Pedestrian Plan 1 Approved: August 27, 2015 PREPARED FOR SANTA ROSA COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BY WEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL IN CONJUNCTION WITH SANTA ROSA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES For information regarding this document, please contact: Kristen A. Shell, AICP | Senior Planner Santa Rosa County Development Services 6051 Old Bagdad Highway, Suite 202 | Milton, FL 32583 South End Phone (MWF) 850-983-1816 | North End Phone (TTH) 850-981-7078 | Fax: (850) 983-9874 [email protected] The preparation of this report has been financed through grant funding from the Department of Economic Opportunity. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................................. 3 TASK ONE: CITIZEN PARTICIPATION ...................................................................................................................................... 4 TASK TWO: IDENTIFICATION OF GOALS AND PRIORITIZATION OBJECTIVES ................................................................. 5 RANKING INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS ................................................................................ 7 PRIORITIZED GOALS ........................................................................................................................... 15 TASK THREE: EXISTING AND PLANNED BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES ANALYSIS ............................................. 16 PLANNED PROJECTS .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gulf Breeze 1 the Park Is Open 24 Hours a Day, 365 Days a Malaquite the Lower National Park Service Year
    National Park Service Park News U.S. Department of the Interior The offi cial newspaper of Padre Island National Seashore The GulGulff BrBreezeeeze Fall 2006 The parkpark protectsprotects the longelongestst sectionsection of undevelopedundeveloped barrier island in the worworld,ld, preservingpreserving rrareare ccoastaloastal prprairie;airie; a ccomplex,omplex, dynamicdynamic dune system;system; and the Laguna Madre,Madre, one of the fewfew hhypersalineypersaline lagoon envirenvironmentsonments llefteft iinn ththee wworld.orld. Superintendent’s WelcomeRecord Year for Endangered Look inside... WELCOME TO PADRE ISLAND Welcome.......................1 National Seashore, one of the most Kemp’s Ridley Sea Turtle Nesting By Donna J. Shaver, Ph.D., Chief, Division of Sea Turtle Science and Recovery special places of the 390 units of the Kemp’s Ridley Turtle......1 National Park Service (NPS). We PADRE ISLAND NATIONAL SEASHORE HAS WORKED DILIGENTLY FOR NEARLY trust that you will have a wonderful Park Information..........2 time as you explore and experience three decades to help save the world’s most endangered sea turtle species from extinction. A this great park. record 64 Kemp’s ridley nests were found at the National Seashore during 2006, exceeding Oil and Gas...................3 the number found in the entire state during 2005. The success of our Kemp’s Ridley Sea Congress established Padre Island Turtle Recovery Program during 2006 is one more step that helps secure the future of this Reptiles.........................4 National Seashore on September 28, magnifi cent species at Padre Island National Seashore and throughout the world. 1962 to “save and preserve, for purpose of public recreation, Feeding Wildlife...........4 benefi t, and inspiration, a portion of the diminishing Long-term recovery eff orts making a diff erence seashore of the United States that remains undeveloped”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gulf Breeze Department of the Interior Padre Island National Seashore News and Information, 2015
    National Park Service The Gulf Breeze Department of the Interior Padre Island National Seashore News and Information, 2015 The Gulf Breeze 1 Gulf Breeze Welcome 2015 Edition to Padre Island National Seashore! An Annual Magazine from I sincerely hope you enjoy your visit to the longest remaining stretch Padre Island National Seashore of undeveloped barrier island in the world. Over half a million visitors come here each year to enjoy camping, swimming, fishing, National Park Service boating, and other recreational activities. One of the top windsurfing U.S. Department of the Interior destinations in North America is located here in the park. Editor, Layout, and Graphic Design: Jody L. Mays Editorial Committee: Patrick Gamman, William The Seashore is an ever changing landscape of beaches, dunes, grasslands and tidal Botts, Lee McDowell, Lindsay Galland, Kathy Sanders flats where visitors can discover an amazing natural world sandwiched between the Gulf of Mexico and the Laguna Madre. Tens of thousands of migratory birds as well Padre Island National Seashore as many species of mammals, reptiles, amphibians, insects and fish are found in the Mailing Address: Physical Address: park. The most endangered sea turtle in the world, the Kemp’s ridley, nests here P.O. Box 181300 20420 Park Road 22 more often than at any other location in the country. Visitors can also explore human Corpus Christi, TX 78480 Corpus Christi, TX 78418 stories of Spanish treasure, shipwrecks and survivors, open range cattle ranching, and more. These rich natural and cultural stories help make Padre Island National Park Information: (361)949-8069 Seashore a national treasure.
    [Show full text]
  • New Orleans to Mobile Corridor Development Plan
    Volume I. Summary Report New Orleans to Mobile Corridor Development Plan Prepared for The Southern Rapid Rail Transit Commission By BURK-KLEINPETER, INC. In Association with Parsons Transportation Group AECOM Consult CSX Transportation October 2006 Gulf Coast High-Speed Rail Corridor New Orleans to Mobile Corridor Development Plan Volume II. Technical Appendices Prepared for The Southern Rapid Rail Transit Commission By BURK-KLEINPETER, INC. Engineers, Architects, Planners and Environmental Engineers 4176 Canal Street New Orleans, LA 70119 Tel: (504) 486-5901 Fax: (504) 483-6228 In Association with Parsons Transportation Group 1133 15th Street, NW Washington, DC 20005 AECOM Consult 2751 Prosperity Avenue, Suite 300 Fairfax, Virginia 22031 May 2006 Southern Rapid Rail Transit Commission Gulf Coast High-Speed Rail Corridor New Orleans to Mobile Corridor Transportation Plan Executive Summary This corridor transportation plan investigates whether, and how, the states of Alabama, Mississippi and Louisiana could upgrade the railroad corridor between New Orleans, LA and Mobile, AL to achieve those states’ passenger train travel time goals, with reliable on-time performance for all freight and passenger operations. The Corridor Today (Chapter 2)1 The rail corridor between Mobile and New Orleans is a critical link in a longer rail route that connects Florida with Texas and the West Coast. The corridor consists of three distinct components, as shown in Figure ES-1, below: • The NO&M Subdivision of the CSXT Corporation between Mobile and New Orleans, • The NS Back Belt between NE Tower/Elysian Fields and East City Junction, and • The New Orleans Union Passenger Terminal (NOUPT) track between East City Junction and NOUPT.
    [Show full text]
  • Senior Spirit 2020
    2020 SENIOR SPIRIT On behalf of Monsignor Hunt, Father Kennell, the staff and all the parishioners here at St. Ann Parish, we would like to wish all the 2020 graduates the best of luck on your future endeavors. May you all continue to be blessed with the gift of the Holy Spirit and have an unending trust in God’s plan. We are so proud of each and every one of you! Graduating High School: Gulf Breeze High School College to be Attending: University of Florida Accomplishments, Awards, & Scholarships Awarded: Member of Science Nat’l Honor Society (11,12), Nat’l Honor Society (12), Nat’l English Honor Society (11,12), Mu Alpha Theta (10,11,12) & Rho Kappa; Received Dolphin Determination Award, Linda Knowles Holiday Scholarship, Rotary Club Scholarship; over 350 service hours; top 5% of class; certified in EMR, CPR, AED & CERT Future Plans: I plan to attend the University of Florida and major in Aerospace Engineering. I hope to work for a commercial flight company before becoming an Engineer for NASA. Josie Baltz Graduating High School: Gulf Breeze High School College to be Attending: University of Miami Accomplishments, Awards, & Scholarships Awarded: Member of Nat’l Honor Society, Science Nat’l Honor Society, Spanish Nat’l Honor Society, Mu Alpha Theta and Nat’l English Honor Society; Varsity Basketball Captain, Selected Florida Girls State Participant, AP Scholar with Honor; Received Catholic Ladies of Columbia Scholarship Future Plans: Plans to major in Neuroscience and go to medical school after college Kaitlyn Biery Graduating High School:
    [Show full text]
  • County Targets Illegal Signs Ruff! Area Pets Demand to Attend Pet Fest 2009 ■ but Official Admits SRC’S Compliance Division Rary Means
    SPORTS COMMUNITY Lady Dolphins’ spirited Shawn Thomas tickles run ends against Kenney ivories on pipe organ The Gulf Breeze Gulf Breeze Presbyterian volleyball team met Church musician performs City celebration has something for all its match in the organ recital with energy Gulf Breeze residents soak up the sun and great regional finals. 1C and passion. 7C times during first annual extravaganza. 1B Fans await latest installment in vampire saga Pg 2B 50¢ YOUR COMMUNITY NEWSPAPER November 19, 2009 County targets illegal signs Ruff! Area pets demand to attend Pet Fest 2009 ■ But official admits SRC’s Compliance Division rary means. Residents and real “It’s abandoned vehicles, boats, tion code enforcement can Superintendent. “They just pop estate agents often put up tires. It’s all a distraction to our BY BRODIE up overnight. It’s very frustrat- community.” and activity be extremely challenging garage-sale or open-house signs GBN Canine Correspondent ing trying to control illegal sig- in rights-of-way and medians. Economy-driven budget and during the nage. I’ve been dealing with it staff cuts have left Santa Rosa Gulf Breeze Some citizens complain that OK, Breezer humans, you BY JOE CULPEPPER for more than 25 years, and County with no full-time code- Area such signage detracts from the had your fun last week dur- Gulf Breeze News there is nothing more frustrating enforcement officers. The coun- Chamber of quality of the area; others insist ing the ‘Life’s A Breeze [email protected] in enforcement than that.” ty has three people, including Brodie Commerce’s it stunts business.
    [Show full text]