Black Torrington Parish Council
Leasefield Farm, Halwill Junction, Beaworthy EX21 5XU Telephone: 07809 688 725 Email: [email protected] To All Black Torrington Parish Councillors,
You are hereby summoned to attend a Virtual Meeting of Black Torrington Parish Council, which will be held on Wednesday, 11th November 2020, 7:00 pm by video conferencing, for the purpose of transacting the following business. In accordance with the Public Bodies (Admission to Meetings) Act 1960 members of the public are welcome to attend, contact the clerk for details of how to do this. D Osborne 05/11/2020
Members of the press and public requiring access to any of the documents mentioned in this agenda are asked to contact the Town Clerk (electronic links to documents are provided where available).
AGENDA
1. To receive and accept apologies (Please make any apologies known to the Parish Clerk) 2. Declarations of Interest - To receive declarations of personal interest and disclosable pecuniary interests (DPI’s) in respect of items on this agenda. 3. Parish Council Minutes - To approve and sign the minutes of the Black Torrington Parish Council meetings held on 14th September 2020 as a correct record. 4. Action List 5. Public Question Time - At the discretion of the Chairman, to receive questions from members of the public relevant to the work of the Council. Matters raised may be added to future agenda. Answers may be given in writing. 6. Councillor Reports - At the discretion of the Chairman, to receive reports from Councillors (Parish, District, and County) - for information only. 7. Finances – Financial Summary / budget preparation Bills to pay, cheques to be raised 8. Highways
Encroachment of hedges between the old reservoir to Windmilland cross onto the road. Speeding in the parish; to consider producing speed signs designed by children (or anyone else). To appoint a new P3 (Parish Paths Partnership) coördinator. Drains and culverts
9. David Lamb – To remember a past chair of the parish council who has recently died.
10. Overflow car park
Policy for use. Working effectively with the Hall Committee. Hedge reduction or removal to improve visibility
11. Christmas Decorations – Should we plant a tree with roots or use a cut tree which will need disposing of Tree holders and other decorations for the parish 12. Black Torrington Playing Fields
Playing Field Committee Report. Infants swing replacement New mower 13. Planning
Torridge District Council - Planning Applications TDC Planning Public Access Portal For information only, Torridge District Council, the determining Authority, has granted permission for the following planning applications: Reference: 1/0580/2020/AGMB Proposal: Prior notification for the change of use of agricultural building to 1 no. dwellinghouse and associated building operations under class Q Location: Barn At Grid Reference 243578 101940, West Chilla, Devon Reference: 1/0444/2020/FUL Proposal: Conversion of redundant barn to dwelling Location: South Trew Farm, Highampton, Beaworthy, Devon Torridge District Council, the determining Authority, has asked for comments for the following planning applications: Reference: 1/0893/2020/FUH Proposal: Remove existing single storey lean-to extension and build a proposed two storey extension. Location: Gorford, Sheepwash, Beaworthy, Devon Deadline 15th November Reference: 1/0888/2020/FUL Proposal: Change of use of land from agricultural to equestrian including erection of stables. Location: 3 Sparks Villas, Black Torrington, Beaworthy, Devon Deadline 15th November 14. To agree the date of the next parish council meeting 15. Close BLACK TORRINGTON PARISH COUNCIL
Minutes of the Black Torrington Parish Council Meeting held on Wednesday, 11th November 2020, at 7pm, by video link
Present: Cllrs, M Hall (MH)(Chair), C Lock (CL), E Barnes (EB), W Frost (WF), P Mills (PM) M Moulton (MM), M Down (MD), D Haywood(DH) & S Powell(SP)
In Attendance: One member of the public & Clerk
1110/01 To receive and accept apologies Apologies were received from County Councillor B Parsons and Ward Councillor P Hackett 1110/02 Declarations of Interest – Councillor E Barnes declared a pecuniary interest in Item 13. Cllr Barnes left the meeting when Item 13 was discussed. W Frost declared a non-pecuniary interest in the same item. 1110/03 Parish Council Minutes It was resolved to approve and sign the minutes of the Parish Council meeting held on 14th September 2020.
1110/04 Action List The Action List was gone through. It may be that the tree surgeon will not be able to carry out the work on the boundary trees, if he can’t we will reconsider the options in February 2021. The car park bollards have been installed. We are waiting for a report on the blocked drain that may be causing the flooding at the Maltings. We are waiting for Stacey’s to start work on the war memorial. The website needs tidying up. Councillor details need updating.
1110/05 Public Question Time The one member of the public wished to talk about the Christmas tree lights so was invited to speak during Item 11
1110/06 Councillor reports Cllr Hall asked for the Council’s views on the proposed “BT Reconnect” – a chance for people to get out and socialise after the COVID19 lockdown. Will the Parish Council be willing to finance the Hall hire, will councillors be willing to attend to listen to parishioners’ concerns? Cllr Frost and Cllr Down thought it a good idea but didn’t want it to interfere with existing community activities and clubs. Cllr Down was concerned we might be setting a precedent to funding clubs. In principle it was agreed it was a good idea and the PC is in principle willing to fund hall hire for a limited (2 or 3 months) period for the BT Reconnect idea and any club struggling to restart. Requests for grants from Citizens Advice and Okehampton Community Transport will be added to the next Agenda
1110/07 Finances • Financial summary
The clerk gave a brief summary of the financial situation. The PC is slightly over budget for the year but has £6,106 available to spend. The Council should be aware that initial expenditure includes VAT. We may need an extraordinary meeting to agree the budget.
• Bills to pay There were no bills to pay
1110/08 Highways Cllr Lock reports that the hedges are overgrown between the old reservoir and Windmiland Cross. The owners have not cut the hedges since the parish council last asked them to cut the hedge back. The PC thought it would be better to ask the owners to cut the hedges back before reporting it to Devon Highways. Cllr Haywood will try and speak to the owners. The Clerk will report it to Devon Highways if the owners cannot be contacted. Cllr Moulton showed several suggested signs to try and slow traffic in the parish. Cllr Moulton will ask the school if they can help design signs. Having signs that can be rotated will help avoid people becoming used to them. Signs should be A3 sized, possibly dibond or plastic. Would it be possible to get a 20mph limit past the School? MH will ask Barry. Councillor M Hall agreed to be P3 coördinator (Parish Paths Partnership). MH gave a summary of progress with drains and culverts. It has been acknowledged by Devon Highways that some of the gullies are not of sufficient diameter. There is no money in the budget to rectify this this financial year. It will be kept under review
1110/09 David Lamb The Council wished to record its sorrow at the recent death of David Lamb and record its gratitude for his service to the community and during his time as chairman of the parish council. Councillor Mills will write an article for consideration for inclusion in the BT Times
1110/10 Overflow car park In future if the Parish Council is discussing anything that has implications for the Parish Hall, the Chair of the Hall should be invited. Now that MM and EB have cut down the hedge visibility when leaving the car park is greatly improved. The situation will be monitored. MH will lower the dog poo bin.
1110/11 Christmas decorations PM suggested a living tree with roots rather than a new tree every year. MD reported that the land does not belong to the Parish Council. WF reported that there is a living tree that the PFC planted that is growing slowly. EB suggested that a 12 to 15 foot tree. The Clerk reported that Devon Highways had refused the request to take an electric supply from a street light. The Clerk was asked to order 2 trees to be delivered from Stacey’s; one for Black Torrington village and one for Chilla. Lighting will probably need to be battery powered LED lights. MM will investigate. A budget of £400 for lights and trees was agreed. There is a FB page “light up BT” to try and get interest in decorating the parish. Councillor Powell will donate a hamper to the best decorated house in Black Torrington parish. MH will put an article in the BT Times asking if local businesses want to contribute to Christmas decorations. The Pump House Upholstery will donate £50 for lights.
1110/12 Black Torrington Playing Fields. • Playing field committee report COVID-19 is still an issue. Cleaning and checks are still ongoing. Adult gym equipment is being used. There is a damaged bench which should be repaired or taken away. • New infants swing
The site for the new swings has been cleared by G Bowden. The swings should be installed soon. • New mower A new mower has not yet been sourced. The Clerk informed the meeting that the Parish Council has a duty of care to its volunteer workers which includes PFC and councillors. Users of any mower will need safety training and personal protective equipment (ear defenders, boots etc.)
1110/13 Planning No Comment 1110/14 To agree the date of the next parish council meeting The next meeting will be on Wednesday January 13th 2021 at 7:00 pm.
1110/15 Close The meeting closed at 20:40 pm Action List
Minute Action Responsible for action Next steps Number 1409/16 Boundary between the Maltings and the Councillor Hall Accept Option “C”: Remove lower branches where playing field; tree pruning appropriate, logs left on site or removed, cost £200 (half days work) 1419/08 Speed Watch M Hall Delayed by the COVIDS Signs in the parish to slow traffic M Moulton Examples circulated. Agenda item November 1409/11 Poppy Wreath £100 donation Clerk Send them a cheque when able (they are not accepting cheques at the moment) 1409/12 Christmas tree All Agenda Item for November Article in BT Times M Moulton Completed 1409/13 Infant’s swing PFC Commissioned Agenda Item November New Mower PFC Agenda Item November 1409/14 Improve viability, Planning pre-app advice Clerk Advice received Agenda Item November Bollard for overflow car park M Hall Completed. 1409/16 Flooding at the Maltings M Hall Completed (for now!) 0807/11 Obtain 3 quotes for the war memorial repairs to Clerk Stacey’s have been commissioned to do the work. a consistent brief. Completed Website compliance with WCAG2.1 Clerk Mr Bowen commissioned to do the work at his quoted regulations price - £270 Contact Caloo to cancel contract Clerk Done From:Ian Firth Sent:28 Jul 2020 10:36:27 +0100 To:Debbie Fuller Cc:Sarla Bull Subject:RE: 1/0405/2020/FUL - Proposed temporary agricultural workers dwelling Importance:High
Hi Debbie,
Thanks for your email.
I shall try to keep this to the point - but I do want to address all points and the Parish / CPRE objections in some detail…
Regards functional need;
We have provided an extensive submission with minimum required standard man day labour requirement calculations at its centre (I stress; ‘minimum’ requirements!). This SMD calculation approach is the normal basis for assessing proposed ‘essential functional need’ in respect of temporary workers dwellings where the business is yet to be fully established. This methodology has been used for many years to assess the labour requirements necessary to operate a farm business (indeed it is the same basis I used when working as a consultant for ADAS and for others subsequently - in undertaking agricultural appraisals for clients and on behalf of local authorities). I would make a further observation that the principle of this application is for a temporary dwelling to enable the applicant to establish their business and then to prove the operation within the next three years – rather than their seeking a permanent full time dwelling at this juncture.
The nature of this application dictates that there certainly isn’t a full time essential functional need at this moment in time. In fact if the farm could operate at proposed capacity now – without a dwelling – the need for a dwelling of any sort would be disproven instantly. This is not the case though… A fully sustainable and operable business can only arise, noting the labour requirements, lack of alternative accommodation (and convertible buildings) on the farm or nearby, and only if the applicant is able to reside on site and is thus is sufficiently assured so as to make the necessary investment and improvements to implement their business plans in full.
I note para 3.8 in your email – there is no question that some farming operations can be operated without significant risk from some distance (where operating an arable farm for example) where the operator may be able to leave their crops and systems to the weather for days or weeks on end or even computer controlled systems may be able to remain in charge for a few hours at a time – allowing the operator to reside off site with surety that their business will not ‘go anywhere’ in the meantime. Indeed with modern mobile communications, many farming activities can be managed remotely with relative ease – even though it may be desirable or convenient to be housed very nearby. However, livestock husbandry is not a function that can be competently left to remote sensors, computer management or to chance. It is not just a matter of convenience to be immediately near to ones’ vulnerable animals – it is absolutely essential.
In respect of the totality of a definition of essential functional need this is difficult to quantify (hence the SMD modal calculations are a reliable baseline for minimum requirements) – however it has been tested at appeal and in the courts and recognised that the total essential need is a sum of various parts – which may vary from site to site. The baseline SMD calculation is the minimum requirement for labour to be on site based on a ‘normal’ farm with good access, reliable facilities, convenient geography and ‘average’ systems. I have centred my appraisal on this basis, as is standard practice, but the council should note that for example, in addition to the known labour requirements, the access to the site in this case (1Km from the highway) adds significantly to the travel time required to attend site (on each visit) and reduces the ability of the applicant to ‘pop by’ to visit the property. Indeed a dedicated trip is necessary just to get to the site from the highway. Where many farms benefit from good road access and convenient settlements nearby, Kingsbeer is not so fortunate.
I do appreciate that the parish council, CPRE and others might argue that the land is not appropriately located. However this is not a reasonable position in relation to agriculture – clearly it is impossible to relocate the land, make it more accessible (note NPPF para 84) or to simply to sell up and re-acquire alternate, ‘more conveniently’ located land. Indeed residing on site will significantly reduce the need to travel to and from site – eliminating the need for multiple trips on a daily basis and thus improving environmental / economic sustainability…
In regard to the functional need requirements for a temporary dwelling (SPD para 3.19) please note the following:
i. The SMD requirements demonstrate the labour requirements which in turn requires a resident worker to be on site permanently (as a full time employee & providing permanent on site supervision of the operation) once the business is fully established. a. The primary points of need - which in combination combine to establish the ‘essential need’ – are (although not exclusively);
i. Animal welfare – first and foremost, the planned animals will need near constant supervision and it is the applicants responsibility to meet and exceed the RSPCA welfare requirements (https://education.rspca.org.uk/documents/1494931/0/FS+The+five+freed oms.pdf/e1e3f7f9-fcce-fdd3-65a8-f29aa4905e2e?t=1555162618511) i.e. to maintain:
1. Freedom from Hunger and thirst 2. Freedom from discomfort 3. Freedom from pain injury or disease 4. Freedom to express normal behaviour 5. Freedom from fear or distress
The fundamental role of the farmer (the applicant) in the proposed farming system is ensuring that these freedoms are met and exceeded at all times. This means that intervention is required immediately that anything arises which might cause any of the freedoms to become jeopardised; for example if a predator (dog / dogs, fox, mink, buzzard etc) were to get into livestock at any time of day or night – the farmer must be there to respond instantly and appropriately - not only to protect the welfare and safety of the animals under his / her care but also to protect their livelihood.
As I’m sure you are aware, without wishing to anthropomorphise, animals frequently achieve feats of ‘stupidity’ that are beyond normal human comprehension, such as (but not limited to): escape, injury, trampling of offspring, knocking over or contaminating water troughs, becoming stuck in fences or other items, escaping from controlled confinement, getting into unwanted confinement (and becoming distressed, or distressing other animals as a result) and again these issues (which can be frequent, repeated, unexpected and varied) need to be managed and resolved immediately by the farmer – they (along with myriad other issues) must not be allowed to continue for any extended period or, particularly, to worsen through lack of immediate response.
If the farmer is not on site – i.e. within sight and sound of the livestock – they will be unable to perform the essential function of their business or to meet their responsibilities to welfare - except for a few instances in the day, assuming the farmer were required to commute from elsewhere. This ‘commuting’ approach simply would not be appropriate or viable (unlike that associated with say an arable / non-livestock farming enterprise).
Of course there is also the need to be present during heightened periods of activity such as (again, not limited to) birthing and during veterinary / disease control issues (which will arise all year round) – and which can happen at any time, day or night, and requires the farmer to be present to ensure good husbandry.
Obviously, aside from the day to day need to thwart livestock’s efforts in finding exciting new ways to commit harikiri, the farmer needs to be present to feed and perform routine daily husbandry on the animals as well (all of which needs their presence and vigilance on unrelenting daily routine – whatever the weather 365 days per year).
ii. Distance from alternate available properties: If there were an available property within sight and sound of the site this would suit the applicants needs – but there isn’t anything suitable or available nearby (nor has there been any suitable property nearby in the last 18 months or more). For info, at present - The nearest available agricultural dwelling is 4.7km by road and ~15-20 minutes each way by car (at best). This is far too far from the site to enable the farmer to respond adequately to urgent animal welfare needs, notwithstanding the fact that the applicant would be so far separated from the land that he would be unaware of circumstances at the site in any case. Were the available house (situated at Brandis Corner) at-least within line of sight it might be arguable that it would enable (at best) the farmer tosee his / her land with binoculars… it would certainly not enable them to hear the behaviour of the livestock (where sound is normally the first indicator of distress or problems arising).
iii. Unsociable hours: As with animals’ apparent wish to cause themselves harm at every opportunity, they don’t keep time – and as such there is no predictable pattern to issues arising (save perhaps that the most severe problems will manifest in the middle of the night and invariably in horrendous weather conditions)… It is normal for livestock farmers to keep time with the sun (as do the animals) and so early starts and late finishes in the summer are normal – winter time however still requires that animals are checked before dawn and after dark (particularly for predator control and in birthing for example). Aside from extraneous events - the farmer needs, on a daily basis (at dawn and after dusk), to secure animals and ensure their welfare (as well as that of the land).
iv. Pest & Disease control: as already mentioned, predator control and livestock security is critical to the business – especially in respect of youngstock (all varieties) and poultry. One loose dog worrying the goats / sheep / pigs could cause catastrophic problems, likewise a fox or mink (noting nearby water) will cause un-told problems if not controlled or, at the very least, deterred. Obviously the need to protect the livestock is not achievable by ‘app’ or remotely – indeed even if a friendly neighbour notified the farmer of an issue by phone, the 15+ minute drive to the site would prevent action from being taken in good time.
A further advantage of permanent residential activity on site is the deterrence created by that very presence. Vermin is far less likely to predate livestock which is situated in close proximity to human occupants… again, this effect adds to the essential need to be on site 24/7.
v. Weather & temperature emergencies: while less of a year round problem, there may be periods of the year when rain, snow, hail, wind or other extreme weather will require immediate reaction to protect livestock (especially young animals), of course climate change will undoubtedly increase this need element over time. The possible impacts of freak weather are far too diverse to list – but inevitably to avoid distress or discomfort, pain or suffering may require a reaction that cannot be provided from miles away (indeed a weather event may even prevent access to the site). A freak snow event (for example) may result in animals being subjected to rapid life threatening conditions – and being forced to reside off site in that circumstance could be the difference between life and death for the farmers livestock.
vi. Economy of energy: This is also an important consideration, both in terms of that of fossil fuel reliance and that of the energy of the farmer him / herself. Noting the length of the drive to the nearest likely settlement (notwithstanding NPPF para 84) it is fair to say that if the farmer were required to operate the business with multiple daily visits (say) distributed as; 1no. visit at dawn, a morning / mid-day visit (with chores and husbandry every day) and a visit at after dusk (plus other trips during high demand / stressful periods) the time and distance spent commuting will detract from the farmers abilities to deliver his / her responsibilities to the livestock and the business plan in general.
ii. The applicant have a sound and viable business plan. Their investment in the completion of their existing agricultural building and other preparatory work on site (commencement of the plan) demonstrates their clear intention to develop the business in accordance with that plan – however the plan requires a worker on site to enable the project to move any further forward with confidence at this point.
iii. Sound financial basis - As above / addressed in the original submission documents.
iv. The council will note that there are no available buildings available on the unit which are available for conversion (unless the existing storage building would be agreeable… although the loss of that structure would hinder the business plan and require replacement like with like in any case!).
I have already touched on this, however in respect of available dwellings – we have undertaken repeated searches for all available properties advertised on Right Move, Prime Location, On the market, Zoopla, Purple Bricks, and through local agents – none of which (searches centred on “west chilla”) shows that there is any property available within sight or sound of the application site (i.e the applicants land).
Notwithstanding the need to be within sight and sound - at present the nearest available freehold property is situated 2.9 miles away at Brandis Corner. Two bungalows are advertised at Halwill Junction (~2.2 miles away) but these seem to be restricted occupancy (covenanted) and so aren’t ‘available’ in any case. There are likewise houses being constructed at Beaworthy (2 miles to the north east) – however these are not yet built or available…
In respect of available rental property, the situation is the same as with freehold options, the nearest advertised property at Shebbear – some 6 miles away…
v. In respect of other general planning requirements (which we presume to mean landscape impact, flood risk, archaeological, environmental, arboricultural impacts etc...) we know of no issues…
CPRE objection
I note the CPRE comments – however I observe that the site they refer to (in respect of 0203/2012/FULM) is not the application site in this case.
The proposed site for the temporary workers dwelling is next to an agricultural building on an area of rye-grass ley. It is about as far from bio-diverse as it is possible to get in environmental terms… There are certainly no protected habitats on the site (within application boundary) and none are expected to be affected or adversely impacted by the introduction of a temporary mobile home... Notwithstanding that point, I would add that the applicant is fully intending to work with and improve the wildlife / biodiversity in those areas that are not in / suitable for agricultural use... and, with respect, the CPRE statement implies that my client is intending to ride roughshod over the habitats regulations… This is the absolute opposite of their intention.
In summary the CPRE objection relates to a presumed intention to desecrate important habitats – on areas which are not covered by this application. Indeed had they had the courtesy of contacting my client before wading in, I am certain that they would have formed a different view. Please therefore, ignore this objection as it relates to an unfounded assumption as to how the applicant might operate their lawful agricultural business and does not directly relate to the planning application, or fact. Needless to say that the organisation are welcome to monitor the applicants progress over coming years (which I have no doubt they will) – however I am of the opinion that they will be pleasantly surprised as to how the applicant will encourage biodiversity and wildlife through highly sustainable practices.
Note that if the application were refused (preventing the business plan from developing) and thus the applicants became unable to develop their business in a sustainable fashion (as planned) the only likely remaining option would be for the land to revert to species poor forage / grass-ley (as it has been used previously) and in this sense is likely to be less favourably treated than will be the case under my clients’ (experienced and sensitive) agricultural stewardship…
Parish Council Response
Nature of operation and location; The applicant wishes to develop a new farm business, they have been searching for suitable site for nearly 6 years and this site is the only block that they were able to acquire in the area during that period and which met the criteria for their business needs. This application will enable the establishment of a new business (which is actively encouraged by policy). The applicant makes no apology that they are new entrants to farming (in respect of ownership at least), nor that they have invested in the area with the intention of setting up a new enterprise. The applicant is experienced and well qualified in agricultural and livestock husbandry terms, they have already started farming the land (although not to its full potential), NPPF para 83 and TDC policy supports the development of agricultural and land based businesses…
Land classification; Not that this issue is strictly relevant to the proposal at hand (as with CPRE comments) but for transparency’ sake; the land is provisionally classified as Grade 3/4. It is neither the best, nor most versatile (in that it is not suitable for high yield crop production) it is however ideally suited for the farming operations proposed by the applicant. It is also the same classification as land covering many 100’s of square kilometres across the district…
Functional need – the PC quoted my report… “In the first year both profitability and labour requirements will not result in the need / justification for a full-time occupational worker from the outset, instead effectively requiring a part time role. That is at least in respect of the ‘operational agricultural business’. That said, much of the applicant’s time in the first and first part of the second year of trading will be consumed in establishing the new business.” This is absolutely correct – and the reason that we are seeking a temporary dwelling (in line with policy) rather than a permanent dwelling. It is not a policy requirement for the applicant to have an instantly successful or fully operational business – this would be impossible (note above)… Please rest assured that the applicant is under no illusion that a there is a degree of risk and a great deal of hard work that will be required to establish their business and to prove that it is both viable and sustainable. We have absolutely no doubt that this is achievable though.
PPS 7 Annexe A…?!?
Essential need - I have covered this above.
Agricultural building lawfulness – this is not part of this application per se. However the building is unquestionably lawful, we have evidence of the commencement by the previous land owner (including evidence on file with the council) and the building has been constructed in compliance with the decision notice referred to: 1/0394/2011/AGR.
Disregard to historic environment – with respect, I must question if the parish are fully aware of the application site or have properly considered the application. While the existing site entrance (access to the highway) is approximately within SIX metres of a listed building (West Chilla Farm House – List no: 1105123). The physical temporary dwelling site is some 930m away… I’m not certain how, at that distance, that this proposal might be considered to have any impact on the heritage asset (there are no other assets near to the site either – designated or otherwise)…
Parish council summary - The parish council correctly note that sustainable development includes Economic, Social and Environmental objectives. The applicant has chosen to acquire this site as it represents an economically and environmentally sustainable opportunity to develop a new land-based / agricultural enterprise – as is supported by planning policy. Their need to live on site is / was a calculated decision and the labour requirements demonstrate that they will need to make significant investment to develop the business as a sustainable concern. The whole point of temporary dwelling policy, and national policies to boot, are to positively and proactively enable the development of agricultural enterprises and to the aim of creating a prosperous rural economy. Yes this business is new, yes it is different to ‘the norm’ and yes it is not a common approach locally – however it is exactly this type of enterprise that ought to give hope to the local farming community that there is an opportunity for agricultural development beyond heavy mechanisation and macro-scale agriculture.
Assuming that the applicant is able to meet or, as we expect, to exceed their plans over the next three years – operations like this will go a long way to providing rural employment for future generations. In our humble opinion, the parish council ought to consider how low impact (policy supported) agricultural development like this may actually benefit future generations in an area with otherwise limited, perhaps decreasing opportunity for young people and new entrants to farming…
-
I trust that the above response provides the detail / confirmation that you require. As always please don’t hesitate to drop me a line if you need anything more…
Kind regards,
Ian Firth BSc (Hons) MRICS MTCPA Development Director - Chartered Surveyor Planning, Design & Diversification
M: 07813 214 535 T: 01823 711 006 (Extn 101)
Bondstones 1990 Ltd Hestercombe House Cheddon Fitzpaine Taunton, Somerset TA2 8LG
Please contact us if you believe you have received this email in error: This message and any attachments may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Bondstones 1990 Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy, forward or show it or any attachments to anyone. Full terms, conditions and provision of service information can be found on our website. Regulated by RICS
From: Debbie Fuller
Dear Mr. Firth,
I am writing to let you know that there may be a delay with this application. I am on annual leave next week, and the deadline is on my return.
I do have concerns that there is no functional need, and would appreciate further information on ‘why it is not possible for the rural enterprise to run effectively without having the worker on site’ (see page 3 of the Rural Workers Supplementary Planning Document at https://consult.torridge.gov.uk/portal/planning/localplan/adoption/)
Could you please explain how it is essential for a worker to be readily available at most times at or near the place of work, with information on the operational need of the enterprise please? (I am not an expert on goats, sheep, pigs etc.).
I have had a comment today from the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE), and Black Torrington Parish Council have objected. You may wish to respond to their points. You can send to me, it doesn’t have to be online.
I would think by the final week in July I will be in a position to issue a decision, and will let you know what my recommendation is before I do.
Kind regards,
Debbie Fuller BA (Geography and Environment with Development), MA (Sustainable Development in Professional Practice), and MRTPI (MA in Planning and Chartered)
Planning Officer, Development Management
Torridge District Council Riverbank House, Bideford, EX39 2QG
Phone 01237 428717 Email [email protected]
From: Ian Firth [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 12 June 2020 15:30 To: Debbie Fuller Cc: Sarla Bull Subject: RE: 1/0405/2020/FUL - Proposed temporary agricultural workers dwelling
Hi Debbie
Thanks for your message.
No changes to the access proposed – the red line solely shows access to the highway not the extent of proposed work – so no anticipated effect on any designated / heritage assets at all!
Regards COVD19 rules – I fully understand, I have only been back to site visits properly this week myself… aside from the agricultural activities there’s not a lot to see / discuss at present anyhow. The agricultural building next to the proposed mobile home position is now completed and in use, but will probably be closed - unless my client are working from / in it – even then, there’s probably not much to see at this stage!
I have cc’d Sarla (applicant) to drop you access details / confirmation.
If there is anything that you need from us in support of the application please don’t hesitate to get in touch.
Speak soon!?
Kind regards,
Ian Firth BSc (Hons) MRICS MTCPA
Director
M 0781 321 4535 Bondstones are specialists in rural planning and T 01823 210 610 architectural design - particularly for ‘change of use’ of 01823 711006 – Extn 101 land & buildings and projects befitting the countryside… O
Please note our team are all working …Together we'll unlock the full potential of your property from home at present – please bare with us!
www.bondstones.co.uk
Registered Offices:
Hestercombe House
Cheddon Fitzpaine Regulated by Taunton Somerset
TA2 8LG
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Bondstones 1990 Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy, forward or show it or any attachments to anyone.
Please contact us if you believe you have received this email in error
Full terms, conditions and provision of service information can be found on our website…
From: Debbie Fuller
Dear Mr. Firth,
Thank you for your application, I am the case officer.
I posted the site notice yesterday, near the Listed Building (affecting the setting of), and although it is quite far from the proposed, it is a statutory requirement where the red line is near a LB.
Can you confirm that there are no proposed changes to the access please?
Can you let me know a time I can visit please, as the gate was shut, and it is best that I arrange access in advance given the current Covid circumstances. I won’t be able to meet anyone, or go into any dwellings.
I am available the week beginning 29th June, but not Thursday, and the w.b 6th July, but not Wednesday (I am on annual leave 22nd to 26th June and have a lot to do next week before going on leave).
Kind regards,
Debbie Fuller BA (Geography and Environment with Development), MA (Sustainable Development in Professional Practice), and MRTPI (MA in Planning and Chartered)
Planning Officer, Development Management
Torridge District Council Riverbank House, Bideford, EX39 2QG
Phone 01237 428717 Email [email protected]
For information on data protection and how your personal data is used please see our Privacy Policy at https://www.torridge.gov.uk/privacypolicy
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed..
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other action taken in reliance of the information contained in this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please use the reply function to tell us and then permanently delete what you have received.
Any views expressed by the sender of this message are not necessarily those of the Torridge District Council.
E-mail is inherently insecure without specific security measures being taken. In essence we cannot guarantee the safe and private delivery of all e-mail, both outbound and inbound, due to the complexity and nature of the networks that it may utilise. Please bear this in mind when sending critical or sensitive information.
Senders and recipients of email should be aware that under UK Data Protection and Freedom of Information legislation these contents may have to be disclosed in response to a request. Under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, Lawful Business Practice Regulations, any E-mail sent to or from this address may be accessed by someone other than the recipient for system management and security purposes.
This email and any attachments have been checked for viruses however you should carry out your own check before opening any attachments. Torridge District Council enforces a corporate wide anti-virus policy. The Council does not accept any liability in respect of damage caused by any virus that is not detected.
Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast Ltd, an innovator in Software as a Service (SaaS) for business. Providing a safer and more useful place for your human generated data. Specializing in; Security, archiving and compliance. To find out more Click Here.
For information on data protection and how your personal data is used please see our Privacy Policy at https://www.torridge.gov.uk/privacypolicy
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed..
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other action taken in reliance of the information contained in this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please use the reply function to tell us and then permanently delete what you have received.
Any views expressed by the sender of this message are not necessarily those of the Torridge District Council. E-mail is inherently insecure without specific security measures being taken. In essence we cannot guarantee the safe and private delivery of all e-mail, both outbound and inbound, due to the complexity and nature of the networks that it may utilise. Please bear this in mind when sending critical or sensitive information.
Senders and recipients of email should be aware that under UK Data Protection and Freedom of Information legislation these contents may have to be disclosed in response to a request. Under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, Lawful Business Practice Regulations, any E- mail sent to or from this address may be accessed by someone other than the recipient for system management and security purposes.
This email and any attachments have been checked for viruses however you should carry out your own check before opening any attachments. Torridge District Council enforces a corporate wide anti-virus policy. The Council does not accept any liability in respect of damage caused by any virus that is not detected. BLACK TORRINGTON PARISH COUNCIL - BUDGET 2020/21
2020 2021 REVISED BUDGET TOTALS YET TO FCAST VARIANCE 2020/21 ACTUALS FORECAST FOR YEAR PAY 2020/21 £ April May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 2020/21 Insurance 578 600 600 - 600 -22 DALC Affiliation 100 98 98 - 98 2 Domain Name/Hosting 67 60 270 330 - 330 -263 Software - - - - 0 Audit 200 - 200 200 0 Admin expenses 100 128 13 141 - 141 -41 Hall Hire 150 - 80 80 70 Clerk 2,573 1,286 1,286 1,286 2,573 0 Training 100 30 30 70 100 0 Travel/Subsistence 100 - 100 100 0 Mem. Garden upkeep 100 - 100 100 0 - BT Times net 500 211 211 215 637 - 137 500 0 Playing Fields/Grass cutting 1,500 - - 1,500 1,500 0 Christmas Tree 100 100 100 - 100 0 War memorial incremental 500 500 500 - 500 0 Minor road repairs 500 - - - 500 Grants/s137fete prize 125 300 100 400 25 425 -300 Reserves 2,314 395 600 995 1,319 2,314 0 9607 369 600 - 1,034 - 3,114 ------5,117 4,543 9,660 -53 checks: 9660 -53 30th October 2020
Black Torrington RECONCILIATION
From Accounts 30th October 2020 ...... Reserve Ac £3,180.00 Current Ac £21,976.27 £25,156.27
Payments not cashed . . . . . Subtract.. (£5,722.09) Receipts not entered . . . . . Add…….. £0.00 Cash as day book £19,434.18
Add payments to come
VAT reversal £3,155.80 Total to come . . . . . Add ...... £3,155.80 Day Book……………………….. 22589.98
Minus restricted funds
Balance of precept yet to pay (£4,543.48) Ring fenced for swing (£4,619.00) Ring fenced for mower incremental (£2,500.00) Ring fenced for tree lifting (£100.00) Ring fenced P3 (£225.00) Ring fenced for toilet (£1,000.00) Minor road repairs (£500.00) War mem repairs(inc TAP Fund) (£2,996.00) Total restricted . . . . . Subtract ...... (£16,483.48) Total Unrestricted £6,106.50 Fw: My idea -BT Reconnect imap://outlook.of ice365.com:993/fetch>UID>/INBOX>27254?h...
Dear Mike
Following our telephone conversa on earlier I am wri ng to set out my idea which I would be grateful if you could put forward to the Parish Council in due course.
With the closing of so many groups in the Village Hall - Monthly markets, Ladies Group, cra group etc- I thought it would be good to try and bring people together again- once permi ed.
My plan is to open the hall on a regular monthly date to encourage people to a end and socialise.This may change to every fortnight depending on uptake and interest.
There would be an entrance fee and refreshments available. Hopefully there would be a corner where people could sit and knit/sew/crochet etc. A place where someone locally could demonstrate a skill such as so toy making, dog grooming, first aid etc. Also a record player with vinyl records!
I would be grateful if the Parish Council would consider covering the hall fee costs? I believe this would be £6 per mee ng.
There is no inten on to make a profit from these mee ngs but any profits made on the day would go to the Blake House and Dr Gwynne Trust League of Friends.
I hope to include people from surrounding villages to make it a fully inclusive, friendly get together.
Your idea of having a Parish Councillor in a endance would be a great addi on.
This is s ll in the early planning stages but I would be interested to hear the Parish Council’s views on the idea.
With many thanks
Sally Hill
1 of 1 10/11/2020, 13:55
Torridge – a great place to live, work and visit Riverbank House, Bideford, Devon, EX39 2QG
Please reply to: Planning Officer: Ryan Steppel/ Direct Dial: 01237 428736 Email: [email protected]
Black Torrington Parish Council Leasefield Farm Halwill Junction Beaworthy EX21 5XU
Our Ref: FPEG/0514/2020 Your Ref: Date: 29th October 2020 Enquiry: Removal of hedge and reduction of bank height to improve visibility splays pursuant to permission 1/0921/2018/FUL Location: Black Torrington Village Hall, Black Torrington, Devon, EX21 5PX
Dear Mr Osborne,
I write further to your recent pre-application enquiry regarding the removal of hedge and reduction of bank height to improve visibility splays.
The supporting information states that they would like to replace the current hedge bank with a turf bank 450mm high with a post and rail fence.
It was necessary to consult the Highways Authority as part of this pre-application enquiry.
Hedge being reduced would be a good thing to help with visibility, and needs doing if it was a requirement for the hall permission.
Reducing to below 600mm would be better, as it will grow up in the summer months and needs to stay under 600mm at all times.
Any fence must be behind the splay created, and if on top of an earth bank this will self-seed and grow up in a few years over the fence.
(Devon Highways).
In my view, you should apply to vary the plans condition for 1/1004/2001 which is likely to be acceptable based on the comments above from the Highways department.
Yours faithfully
Ryan Steppel
1. When you make an application please ensure that it meets the requirements of the Council’s validation advice note and that a validation checklist appropriate for the type of application is completed and submitted with it.
torridge.gov.uk @torridgedc Torridge – a great place to live, work and visit Riverbank House, Bideford, Devon, EX39 2QG
2. The advice note and relevant checklist can be accessed via the "Applying for planning permission" pages of the council's website (http://www.torridge.gov.uk/planningforms).
3. The advice given above does not indicate any formal decision by the Council as Local Planning Authority. Any views or opinions are given in good faith, and to the best of ability, without prejudice to the formal consideration of any planning application.
4. The final decision on any application can only be taken after the Council has consulted local people, statutory consultees and any other interested parties.
5. A final decision on an application will be made by senior officers or by the council’s Planning Committee and will be based on all the information available at that time.
6. This advice will be carefully considered in reaching a decision or recommendation on any resulting applications; subject to the proviso that the circumstances and information may change or come to light that could alter the position. It should be noted that the weight given to pre-application advice will decline over time.
7. Please be aware that the proposed development may also require Building Regulations Approval. We would suggest you contact Building Control on 01237 428724 if you would like to discuss this further.
8. If you are planning a new development or extending an existing property over, or within 3 metres of public assets you need to contact South West Water.
Note: we will not permit building within 4.5 metres of public water mains, sewage rising mains or sewers on a new development or redevelopment site. For more information please refer to the information on our website:
Clean water – https://www.southwestwater.co.uk/developer-services/water-services-andconnections/ building-near-water-mains/
Waste water - https://www.southwestwater.co.uk/buildover
@torridgedc Holsworthy Rural Policing Update 1/9/20 – 31/10/20:
The following crimes have been reported:
ASHWATER:
Use threatening/abusive/insulting words or behaviour Failure to comply with condition of firearm certificate
BLACK TORRINGTON:
Possess a shotgun without a certificate Possess a controlled substance of class A
BRADFORD:
Fraud
BRADWORTHY:
Theft from a motor vehicle Person in charge of a dog worrying livestock Communications offence Harassment without violence
BRIDGERULE:
Communications offence Produce a controlled substance of class B
BROADWOODWIDGER:
Common assault
HOLLACOMBE:
2 x Criminal damage to motor vehicle 2 x Theft of batteries
HOLSWORTHY HAMLETS:
Drive motor vehicle when alcohol above limit Criminal damage to hay bales MILTON DAMEREL:
2 x Drive motor vehicle when alcohol above limit Theft of batteries from temporary traffic lights
PANCRASWEEK:
Common assault
ST. GILES ON THE HEATH:
Communications offence Grevious Bodily Harm with intent Burglary of a dwelling
THORNBURY:
Use threatening/abusive/insulting words or behaviour Fraud
There were also 13 domestic related crimes reported during this period.
You will notice a couple of Fraud offences on this month’s report. These are not usually counted as part of our crime statistics, but we thought it was important to bring parishoners attention to the fact that fraud, particularly telephone and online fraud, is something they need to be aware of, and to take steps to avoid falling victim of. Fraud advice can be found on our website, here: https://www.devon-cornwall.police.uk/advice/your-money/fraud/
General Crime Prevention advice, with links to Farm Watch and property marking, can also be found on our website.
If you have an incident to report, don’t hesitate to ring the Police on 101, or email [email protected].
Always call 999 if you see a crime taking place.
Crimes can also be reported via our website: https://services.devon-cornwall.police.uk/crimereporting/
and information can be passed using this link: https://www.devon-cornwall.police.uk/contact/contact-forms/report- something/
or by calling Crimestoppers, anonymously, on 0800 555 111 PC Amanda Brown & PCSO Mark James Holsworthy Police Station [email protected]