Control Calendar (PDF

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Control Calendar (PDF 2007 San Francisco Estuary Invasive Spartina Control Program Schedule Updated: 9/14/07 More information on: Treatment methods Imazapyr Site Locations Treatment Location Treatment Method (gray areas denote sites where treatment was not planned this year or was completed) Imazapyr Herbicide Manual Sub-Area Amphibious Aerial: Aerial: Spray Covering with Manual Site # Site Name Sub-Area Name County Treatment date Truck Backpack Boat Excavation Number vehicle Broadcast Ball Geotextile Fabric Digging 01a Channel Mouth Alameda 7/31-8/2/07 XX 01b Lower Channel (not including mouth) Alameda 7/31-8/2/07 XX 01c Upper Channel Alameda 7/31-8/2/07 Alameda Flood Control XX 1 Upper Channel - Union City Blvd to I- Channel 01d Alameda 7/23-7/27/07 XX 880 01e Strip Marsh No. of Channel Mouth Alameda 7/31-8/2/07 X 01f Pond 3-AFCC Alameda 7/31-8/2/07 XX Belmont Slough/Island, North Point, 02a Bird Island, Steinberger Slough/ San Mateo 9/10-9/13/07 XX Redwood Shores Steinberger Slough South, Corkscrew 02b San Mateo 7/31-8/2/07 XXX Slough, Redwood Creek North 02c B2 North Quadrant San Mateo 7/31-8/2/07 XX 02d B2 South Quadrant - Rookery San Mateo 7/31-8/2/07 X 2 Bair/Greco Islands 02e West Point Slough NW San Mateo 7/31-8/2/07 XX 02f Greco Island North San Mateo 7/31-8/2/07 X 02g West Point Slough SW and East San Mateo 8/27- 8/30/07 XX 02h Greco Island South San Mateo 7/31-8/2/07 X 02i Ravenswood Slough & Mouth San Mateo 7/31-8/2/07 XX 02j Ravenswood Open Space Preserve San Mateo 9/10-9/13/07 X 03a Blackie's Creek (above bridge) Marin 8/29/07 X 3 Blackie's Pasture 03b Blackie's Creek Mouth Marin 8/29/07 X 04a Corte Madera Marsh Reserve Marin 9/10/07 X 04b College of Marin Ecological Reserve Marin 9/10/07 X X 04c Piper Park East Marin Autumn 2007 X 04d Piper Park West Marin Autumn 2007 X 04e Larkspur Ferry Landing Area Marin 7/16-7/18/07 X 04f Riviera Circle Marin 7/16-7/18/07 XXX Corte Madera Creek 9/13-9/14/07 X X 4 04g Creekside Park Marin Complex 9/26/07 X Upper Corte Madera Creek (Above Bon 04h Marin 9/13-9/14/07 XX X Air Road) Lower Corte Madera Creek (Between 04i Marin Autumn 2007 X Bon Air Road & HWY 101) Corte Madera Creek Mouth 04j Marin 9/10/07 XX (Downstream of HWY 101) 04k Boardwalk No. 1 (Arkites) Marin 9/10/07 X X Mowry Marsh-Newark Slough to 05a Alameda 7/31-8/2/07 XX Calaveras Point 05b Dumbarton/Audubon Alameda 7/31-8/2/07 X 05c Newark Slough Alameda 7/31-8/2/07 XX Coyote Creek/Mowry 5 Complex 05d LaRiviere Marsh Alameda TBD (September) 05e Mayhew's Landing Alameda TBD (September) 05f Coyote Creek- Alameda County Alameda 7/31-8/2/07 X 05g Cargill Pond (W Hotel) Alameda TBD (September) 06a Emeryville Crescent East Alameda 9/12/07 X 6 Emeryville Crescent 06b Emeryville Crescent West Alameda 9/14/07 XX 2007 San Francisco Estuary Invasive Spartina Control Program Schedule Updated: 9/14/07 More information on: Treatment methods Imazapyr Site Locations Treatment Location Treatment Method (gray areas denote sites where treatment was not planned this year or was completed) Imazapyr Herbicide Manual Sub-Area Amphibious Aerial: Aerial: Spray Covering with Manual Site # Site Name Sub-Area Name County Treatment date Truck Backpack Boat Excavation Number vehicle Broadcast Ball Geotextile Fabric Digging 07a Oro Loma Marsh-East Alameda 7/30-7/31/07 XX 7 Oro Loma Marsh 07b Oro Loma Marsh-west Alameda 7/30-7/31/07 X 8 Palo Alto Baylands 08a Palo Alto Baylands Santa Clara 9/10-9/11/07 XX 9 Pickleweed Park 9 Pickleweed Park Marin 9/14/07 X 10a Whittel Marsh Contra Costa TBD (September) X 10 Point Pinole Marshes 10b Southern Marsh Contra Costa TBD (September) X 10c Lone Pine Marsh Contra Costa TBD (September) 11 Southampton Marsh 11 Southampton Marsh Solano TBD (Late September) X 12a Pier 94 San Francisco X 12b Pier 98/Heron's Head San Francisco X 12c India Basin San Francisco 8/31/07 X 12d Hunters Point Naval Reserve San Francisco 8/31/07 X 12 Southeast San Franciso 9/12/07 X 12e Yosemite Channel San Francisco 9/20/07 12f Candlestick Cove San Francisco 9/12/07 X 12g Crissy Field San Francisco n/a X 13a Old Alameda Creek North Bank Alameda 7/31-8/2/07 X 13b Old Alameda Creek Island Alameda 7/31-8/2/07 X 13c Old Alameda Creek South Bank Alameda 7/31-8/2/07 X 13 Whale's Tail Complex 13d Whale's Tail North Fluke Alameda 7/31-8/2/07 X X 13e Whale's Tail South Fluke Alameda 7/31-8/2/07 X 13f Cargill Mitigation Marsh Alameda 7/31-8/2/07 X 13g Upstream of 20 Tide Gates Alameda 7/31-8/2/07 X 13h Eden Landing-North Creek Alameda 7/31-8/2/07 X 13i Eden Landing-Pond 10 Alameda 7/31-8/2/07 X South Bay Marshes - Santa Clara 15a Santa Clara TBD (September) XX County 15 South Bay Marshes 15b Faber/Laumeister Marsh San Mateo 8/1/07 X 15c Shoreline Regional Park San Mateo 9/26/07 XX Cooley Landing Salt Pond 16 16 Cooley Landing San Mateo 8/1/07 X Restoration Alameda Island South (Elsie Roemer 17a Bird Sanctuary, Crown Memorial State Alameda 9/11-9/12/07 XX Beach, Crab Cove) 17b Bay Farm Alameda 9/11-9/12/07 X 17c Arrowhead Marsh Alameda 7/30-7/31/07 X MLK Regional Shoreline/Garretson 7/30-7/31/07 17d Alameda XX Point 9/12-9/13/07 17e San Leandro Creek Alameda 9/12/-9/14/07 X Alameda/ 17f Oakland Inner Harbor Alameda 8/13-8/16/07 17 X San Leandro Bay Complex 17g Coast Guard Island Alameda 8/13-8/16/07 X 7/30-7/31/07 17h MLK Marsh Alameda X 9/11-9/12/07 17i Coliseum Channels Alameda 8/13-8/16/07 X 17j Fan Marsh Alameda 9/10/07 X 17k Airport Channel Alameda 9/12-9/13/07 X X 17l Doolittle Pond Alameda TBD (September) X Alameda Island (East: Aeolian Yacht 17m Alameda 9/11-9/12/07 X Club and Eastern Shoreline) 18a Colma Creek San Mateo 9/11, 9/14/07 X 18b Navigable Slough San Mateo 9/11, 9/14/07 X 2007 San Francisco Estuary Invasive Spartina Control Program Schedule Updated: 9/14/07 More information on: Treatment methods Imazapyr Site Locations Treatment Location Treatment Method (gray areas denote sites where treatment was not planned this year or was completed) Imazapyr Herbicide Manual Sub-Area Amphibious Aerial: Aerial: Spray Covering with Manual Site # Site Name Sub-Area Name County Treatment date Truck Backpack Boat Excavation Number vehicle Broadcast Ball Geotextile Fabric Digging 18c "Old Marina" San Mateo 7/31-8/2/07 XX Colma Creek/ 18d "Inner Harbor" San Mateo 7/31-8/2/07 X 18 San Bruno Marsh Complex 18e Sam Trans Peninsula San Mateo 7/31-8/2/07 X 18f "Confluence Marsh" San Mateo 7/31-8/2/07 X 18g San Bruno Marsh San Mateo 7/31-8/2/07 X 18h San Bruno Creek San Mateo 9/11, 9/14/07 X 19a Brisbane Lagoon San Mateo 9/4-9/6/07 XX 19b Sierra Point San Mateo 9/4-9/6/07 X 19c Oyster Cove San Mateo 9/4-9/6/07 X 19d Oyster Point Marina San Mateo 9/4-9/6/07 X 19e Oyster Point Park San Mateo 9/4-9/6/07 X 19f Point San Bruno San Mateo 9/14/07 X 19g Seaplane Harbor San Mateo 9/11-9/12/07 XXX 19h SFO San Mateo 9/11-9/12/07 XXX 19i Mills Creek Mouth San Mateo 9/11-9/12/07 XX 19 West San Francisco Bay 19j Easton Creek Mouth San Mateo 9/13/07 XX 19k Sanchez Marsh San Mateo 8/16/07 X 19l Burlingame Lagoon San Mateo 8/16/07 X 19m Fisherman's Park San Mateo 8/16/07 X 19n Coyote Point Marina/Marsh San Mateo 8/17/07 XX San Mateo Creek/ 19o San Mateo 8/17/07 XX Ryder Park 19p Seal Slough Mouth San Mateo 9/25-9/26/07 X 19q Foster City San Mateo 8/28/07 X 19r Anza Lagoon San Mateo 8/16/07 X 20a Oyster Bay Regional Shoreline Alameda 7/30/07 X 20b Lew Galbraith Golf Course Alameda TBD (September) X 7/30/2007; 20c Dog Bone Marsh Alameda 9/11-9/13/07 X 9/4-9/7/07; 20d Citation Marsh Alameda XX 9/12-9/14/07 20e East Marsh Alameda 9/11-9/12/07 X 20f North Marsh Alameda 7/30/07 XX 7/30/2007; 20g Bunker Marsh Alameda XX 9/11-9/13/07 20h San Lorenzo Creek & Mouth Alameda 7/30/07 San Leandro/ X 20 Hayward Shoreline 20i Bockmann Channel Alameda TBD (September) X 20j Sulphur Creek Alameda TBD (September) X 20k Hayward Landing Alameda TBD (September) X 20l Johnson's Landing Alameda TBD (September) X 20m Cogswell Marsh, Quadrant A Alameda 7/30/07 X 20n Cogswell Marsh, Quadrant B Alameda 7/30/07 X 20o Cogswell Marsh, Quadrant C Alameda 7/30/07 X 20p Hayward Shoreline Outliers Alameda 7/30/07 X 20q San Leandro Shoreline Outliers Alameda 7/30/07 X Oakland Airport Shoreline and 20r Alameda 7/30/07 X Channels 21a Ideal Marsh North Alameda 7/31-8/2/07 X 21 Ideal Marsh 21b Ideal Marsh South Alameda 7/31-8/2/07 X 22a Wildcat Marsh Contra Costa 9/25-9/26/07 X 22b San Pablo Marsh Contra Costa 9/25-9/26/07 X 22c Rheem Creek Area Contra Costa 9/25-9/26/07 X 22d Stege Marsh Contra Costa 9/25-9/26/07 X 22 Two Points Complex 22e Hoffman Marsh Contra Costa n/a 2007 San Francisco Estuary Invasive Spartina Control Program Schedule Updated: 9/14/07 More information on: Treatment methods Imazapyr Site Locations Treatment Location Treatment Method (gray areas denote sites where treatment was not planned this year or was completed) Imazapyr Herbicide Manual Sub-Area Amphibious Aerial: Aerial: Spray Covering with Manual Site # Site Name Sub-Area Name County Treatment date Truck Backpack Boat Excavation Number vehicle Broadcast Ball Geotextile Fabric Digging Albany Shoreline and Bulb (including 22f Contra Costa 9/25-9/26/07 X Codornices Creek mouth) 22g Giant Marsh Contra Costa n/a 23a Brickyard Cove Marin 8/29/07 X 23b Beach Drive Marin 8/28/07 XX 23c Loch Lomond Marina Marin 8/29/07 X 23d San Rafael Canal Mouth North Marin 8/28/07 X 23e Martas Marsh Marin 9/26/07 X 23f Paradise Cay Marin 9/13/07 XX 23 Marin Outliers 23g Greenwood Cove Marin TBD (September) X 23h Strawberry Point Marin TBD (September) X 23i Strawberry Cove Marin 9/13/07 X 23j Bothin Marsh Marin 9/14/07 X 23k Sausalito Marin 9/14/07 X 23l Starkweather Park Marin 8/29/07 X 23m Novato Marin 9/13/07 X Upper Petaluma River- Upstream of 24a Sonoma 9/14/07 X Grey's Field 24b Grey's Field Sonoma n/a 24 Petaluma River 24c Petaluma Marsh Sonoma 9/14/07 X Lower Petaluma River-Downstream of 24d Marin n/a San Antonio Creek 25a Yerba Buena Island San Francisco TBD (September) X 25 Bay Islands 25b Marin Island Marin n/a 26a Tom's Point, Tomales Marin n/a 26b Limantour Estero Marin TBD (September) X 26 Outer Coast 26c Drakes Estero Marin TBD (September) X 26d Bolinas Lagoon, North Marin n/a 26e Bolinas Lagoon, South Marin n/a.
Recommended publications
  • Proposal for Pillar Point Rvpark Public Restroom and Green Space Design,Engineering,Permitting
    PPRROOPPOOSSAALL FFOORR PPIILLLLAARR PPOOIINNTT RRVV PPAARRKK PPUUBBLLIICC RREESSTTRROOOOMM AANNDD GGRREEEENN SSPPAACCEE DDEESSIIGGNN,, EENNGGIINNEEEERRIINNGG,, PPEERRMMIITTTTIINNGG AANNDD CCOONNSSTTRRUUCCTTIIOONN SSUUPPPPOORRTT SSEERRVVIICCEESS Submitted to: San Mateo County Harbor District Submitted by: Questa Engineering Corporation In Association with: Ware Associates Zeiger Engineers, Inc. mack5 October 7, 2019 October 7, 2019 San Mateo County Harbor District Attn: Deputy Secretary of the District 504 Ave Alhambra, Ste. 200 El Granada, CA 94018 Subject: Proposal for Pillar Point RV Park Public Restroom and Green Space Design, Engineering, Permitting and Construction Support Services Dear Mr. Moren: Questa Engineering Corporation is pleased to present this Proposal for the Pillar Point Project. We have assembled a highly qualified team, including Ware Associates (architecture/engineering services), Zeiger Engineers, Inc. (electrical engineering), and mack5 (cost estimating). Questa is widely recognized as one of California’s leading park and trail planning and engineering design firms for open space and natural park areas in constrained and challenging sites, including coastal and beach areas. We also have extensive experience in trail planning and design in parks, and sites with complex environmental and geotechnical issues. Questa provides complete services in planning, landscape architecture and engineering design of recreational improvement projects, from preliminary engineering investigations/feasibility studies and constraints
    [Show full text]
  • Bothin Marsh 46
    EMERGENT ECOLOGIES OF THE BAY EDGE ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE AND SEA LEVEL RISE CMG Summer Internship 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface Research Introduction 2 Approach 2 What’s Out There Regional Map 6 Site Visits ` 9 Salt Marsh Section 11 Plant Community Profiles 13 What’s Changing AUTHORS Impacts of Sea Level Rise 24 Sarah Fitzgerald Marsh Migration Process 26 Jeff Milla Yutong Wu PROJECT TEAM What We Can Do Lauren Bergenholtz Ilia Savin Tactical Matrix 29 Julia Price Site Scale Analysis: Treasure Island 34 Nico Wright Site Scale Analysis: Bothin Marsh 46 This publication financed initiated, guided, and published under the direction of CMG Landscape Architecture. Conclusion Closing Statements 58 Unless specifically referenced all photographs and Acknowledgments 60 graphic work by authors. Bibliography 62 San Francisco, 2019. Cover photo: Pump station fronting Shorebird Marsh. Corte Madera, CA RESEARCH INTRODUCTION BREADTH As human-induced climate change accelerates and impacts regional map coastal ecologies, designers must anticipate fast-changing conditions, while design must adapt to and mitigate the effects of climate change. With this task in mind, this research project investigates the needs of existing plant communities in the San plant communities Francisco Bay, explores how ecological dynamics are changing, of the Bay Edge and ultimately proposes a toolkit of tactics that designers can use to inform site designs. DEPTH landscape tactics matrix two case studies: Treasure Island Bothin Marsh APPROACH Working across scales, we began our research with a broad suggesting design adaptations for Treasure Island and Bothin survey of the Bay’s ecological history and current habitat Marsh.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Abundance
    DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE IN RELATION TO HABITAT AND LANDSCAPE FEATURES AND NEST SITE CHARACTERISTICS OF CALIFORNIA BLACK RAIL (Laterallus jamaicensis coturniculus) IN THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY ESTUARY FINAL REPORT To the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service March 2002 Hildie Spautz* and Nadav Nur, PhD Point Reyes Bird Observatory 4990 Shoreline Highway Stinson Beach, CA 94970 *corresponding author contact: [email protected] PRBO Black Rail Report to FWS 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY We conducted surveys for California Black Rails (Laterallus jamaicensis coturniculus) at 34 tidal salt marshes in San Pablo Bay, Suisun Bay, northern San Francisco Bay and western Marin County in 2000 and 2001 with the aims of: 1) providing the best current information on distribution and abundance of Black Rails, marsh by marsh, and total population size per bay region, 2) identifying vegetation, habitat, and landscape features that predict the presence of black rails, and 3) summarizing information on nesting and nest site characteristics. Abundance indices were higher at 8 marshes than in 1996 and earlier surveys, and lower in 4 others; with two showing no overall change. Of 13 marshes surveyed for the first time, Black Rails were detected at 7 sites. The absolute density calculated using the program DISTANCE averaged 2.63 (± 1.05 [S.E.]) birds/ha in San Pablo Bay and 3.44 birds/ha (± 0.73) in Suisun Bay. At each survey point we collected information on vegetation cover and structure, and calculated landscape metrics using ArcView GIS. We analyzed Black Rail presence or absence by first analyzing differences among marshes, and then by analyzing factors that influence detection of rails at each survey station.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Oyster Reef Construction Underway in Richmond San
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Media Contact: Taylor Samuelson [email protected] 510-286-4182 April 19, 2019 Native Oyster Reef Construction Underway in Richmond San Francisco Bay Living Shorelines Project 350 Reef Structures will become habitat for Native Oysters and Pacific Herring Richmond, CA - From April 9-30, 350 oyster reef elements are being placed in nearshore areas to create a living shoreline near Giant Marsh at Point Pinole Regional Shoreline managed by East Bay Regional Park District in the City of Richmond. Eelgrass beds will be planted next to the reefs in the following weeks to create a habitat ideal for the recruitment of native Olympia oysters and other aquatic species. Living shorelines use nature-based infrastructure to create shoreline buffers that reduce the impacts from sea level rise and erosion, while creating habitat for fish and wildlife. Though a relatively new climate adaptation technique, living shorelines are proving to be an effective approach to protecting coastal resources and shoreline communities. The Giant Marsh project is one of a small number of living shoreline trial projects taking place in the San Francisco Bay, but is the only one that connects the submerged underwater habitats with adjacent wetlands and upland ecotone plant communities. This innovative demonstration project is testing a combined living shorelines approach with habitat elements at different tidal elevations at the same site, with a goal of encouraging other cities and partners to undertake this kind of climate adaptation habitat restoration project at additional sites in the bay. The multi-habitat project at Giant Marsh builds on lessons learned from the Coastal Conservancy’s living shoreline project constructed directly across the bay in San Rafael in 2012, which included the construction of oyster reefs and eelgrass beds.
    [Show full text]
  • Active Wetland Habitat Projects of the San
    ACTIVE WETLAND HABITAT PROJECTS OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY JOINT VENTURE The SFBJV tracks and facilitates habitat protection, restoration, and enhancement projects throughout the nine Bay Area Projects listed Alphabetically by County counties. This map shows where a variety of active wetland habitat projects with identified funding needs are currently ALAMEDA COUNTY MAP ACRES FUND. NEED MARIN COUNTY (continued) MAP ACRES FUND. NEED underway. For a more comprehensive list of all the projects we track, visit: www.sfbayjv.org/projects.php Alameda Creek Fisheries Restoration 1 NA $12,000,000 McInnis Marsh Habitat Restoration 33 180 $17,500,000 Alameda Point Restoration 2 660 TBD Novato Deer Island Tidal Wetlands Restoration 34 194 $7,000,000 Coyote Hills Regional Park - Restoration and Public Prey enhancement for sea ducks - a novel approach 3 306 $12,000,000 35 3.8 $300,000 Access Project to subtidal habitat restoration Hayward Shoreline Habitat Restoration 4 324 $5,000,000 Redwood Creek Restoration at Muir Beach, Phase 5 36 46 $8,200,000 Hoffman Marsh Restoration Project - McLaughlin 5 40 $2,500,000 Spinnaker Marsh Restoration 37 17 $3,000,000 Eastshore State Park Intertidal Habitat Improvement Project - McLaughlin 6 4 $1,000,000 Tennessee Valley Wetlands Restoration 38 5 $600,000 Eastshore State Park Martin Luther King Jr. Regional Shoreline - Water 7 200 $3,000,000 Tiscornia Marsh Restoration 39 16 $1,500,000 Quality Project Oakland Gateway Shoreline - Restoration and 8 200 $12,000,000 Tomales Dunes Wetlands 40 2 $0 Public Access Project Off-shore Bird Habitat Project - McLaughlin 9 1 $1,500,000 NAPA COUNTY MAP ACRES FUND.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildcat Creek Restoration Action Plan Version 1.3 April 26, 2010 Prepared by the URBAN CREEKS COUNCIL for the WILDCAT-SAN PABLO WATERSHED COUNCIL
    wildcat creek restoration action plan version 1.3 April 26, 2010 prepared by THE URBAN CREEKS COUNCIL for the WILDCAT-SAN PABLO WATERSHED COUNCIL Adopted by the City of San Pablo on August 3, 2010 wildcat creek restoration action plan table of contents 1. INTRODUCTION 5 1.1 plan obJectives 5 1.2 scope 6 Urban Urban 1.5 Methods 8 1.5 Metadata c 10 reeks 2. WATERSHED OVERVIEW 12 c 2.1 introdUction o 12 U 2.2 watershed land Use ncil 13 2.3 iMpacts of Urbanized watersheds 17 april 2.4 hydrology 19 2.5 sediMent transport 22 2010 2.6 water qUality 24 2.7 habitat 26 2.8 flood ManageMent on lower wildcat creek 29 2.9 coMMUnity 32 3. PROJECT AREA ANALYSIS 37 3.1 overview 37 3.2 flooding 37 3.4 in-streaM conditions 51 3.5 sUMMer fish habitat 53 3.6 bioassessMent 57 4. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 58 4.1 obJectives, findings and strategies 58 4.2 recoMMended actions according to strategy 61 4.3 streaM restoration recoMMendations by reach 69 4.4 recoMMended actions for phase one reaches 73 t 4.5 phase one flood daMage redUction reach 73 able of 4.6 recoMMended actions for watershed coUncil 74 c ontents version 1.3 april 26, 2010 2 wildcat creek restoration action plan Urban creeks coUncil april 2010 table of contents 3 figUre 1-1: wildcat watershed overview to Point Pinole Regional Shoreline wildcat watershed existing trail wildcat creek highway railroad city of san pablo planned trail other creek arterial road bart Parkway SAN PABLO Richmond BAY Avenue San Pablo Point UP RR San Pablo WEST COUNTY BNSF RR CITY OF LANDFILL NORTH SAN PABLO RICHMOND San Pablo
    [Show full text]
  • REQUEST for QUALIFICATIONS and PROPOSALS Notice of Development Opportunity Historic Anitas Building: 920 Macdonald Ave
    REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS AND PROPOSALS Notice of Development Opportunity Historic Anitas Building: 920 Macdonald Ave. Macdonald Ave. and 11th St. - 1940’s Source: Online Archive of California City of Richmond, California Issued by the City of Richmond, CA City Manager’s Office, Development Services Submission Deadline: May 3, 2019 at 12:00 PM (PDT) City of Richmond, CA REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS AND PROPOSALS Notice of Development Opportunity 920 Macdonald Ave. City of Richmond, California City Council Mayor Tom Butt Vice Mayor Melvin Willis Councilmember Nathaniel Bates Councilmember Ben Choi Councilmember Eduardo Martinez Councilmember Jael Myrick Councilmember Demnlus Johnson III City Manager Carlos Martinez City Manager Bill Lindsay Stay updated on all Richmond Opportunity Sites: http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/OpportunitySites Request for Qualifications/Request for Proposals: 920 Macdonald Ave. 2 City of Richmond, CA Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................... 4 II. NEIGHBORHOOD & COMMUNITY ASSETS............................. 6 III. SITE VISION...................................................................................... 21 IV. SITE AND PARCEL SUMMARY...................................................... 23 V. DEVELOPMENT TEAM SELECTION............................................ 29 VI. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS..................................................... 30 VII. SELECTION CRITERIA, PROCESS & SCHEDULE.................. 33 VIII. CITY NON-LIABILITY & RELATED MATTERS....................
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Adaptation Study APPENDIX
    City of Richmond Climate Change Adaptation Study APPENDIX City of Richmond Climate Action Plan Appendix F: Climate Change Adaptation Study Acknowledgements The City of Richmond has been an active participant in the Contra Costa County Adapting to Rising Tides Project, led by the Bay Conservation Development Commission (BCDC) in partnership with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, the State Coastal Conservancy, the San Francisco Estuary Partnership, the San Francisco Estuary Institute, Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, and consulting firm AECOM. Environmental Science Associates (ESA) completed this Adaptation Study in coordination with BCDC, relying in part on reports and maps developed for the Adapting to Rising Tides project to assess the City of Richmond’s vulnerabilities with respect to sea level rise and coastal flooding. City of Richmond Climate Action Plan F-i Appendix F: Climate Change Adaptation Study This page intentionally left blank F-ii City of Richmond Climate Action Plan Appendix F: Climate Change Adaptation Study Table of Contents Acknowledgements i 1. Executive Summary 1 1.1 Coastal Flooding 2 1.2 Water Supply 2 1.3 Critical Transportation Assets 3 1.4 Vulnerable Populations 3 1.5 Summary 3 2. Study Methodology 4 2.1 Scope and Organize 4 2.2 Assess 4 2.3 Define 4 2.4 Plan 5 2.5 Implement and Monitor 5 3. Setting 6 3.1 Statewide Climate Change Projections 6 3.2 Bay Area Region Climate Change Projections 7 3.3 Community Assets 8 3.4 Relevant Local Planning Initiatives 9 3.5 Relevant State and Regional Planning Initiatives 10 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4.9 Land Use and Planning
    Section 4.9 Land Use and Planning 4.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING 4.9.1 Introduction This section evaluates the potential land use and planning impacts of development under the 2014 LRDP. The planned 2014 LRDP land uses are described and assessed for potential conflicts with existing RBC site and surrounding land uses and land use plans. Public and agency NOP comments related to land use and planning are summarized below: The EIR should consider proposed new building heights and massing in terms of compatibility with surrounding uses. The EIR should consider 2014 LRDP compatibility with the Eastshore State Park General Plan goals and policies. The 2014 LRDP should conform to local zoning and approved local land use policies to the maximum extent feasible. These comments are considered in the analysis below. 4.9.2 Environmental Setting Project Site The approximately 134-acre RBC site is in the City of Richmond, approximately 5 miles northwest of the UC Berkeley campus and the LBNL site in Berkeley (see Figure 3-1). The City of Richmond is in Contra Costa County. The RBC site is bounded on the west by a PG&E service station, on the northwest by Regatta Boulevard, on the northeast by Meade Street, on the east by South 46th Street, and on the south by the San Francisco Bay. I-580 runs parallel to Meade Street along the northeastern boundary of the RBC site. Existing On-Site Land Uses The RBC site has been the location of a variety of industrial enterprises dating back to the mid- 19th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Point Isabel
    bulldozed as fl at as a pancake, which greatly El Cerrito Historical Society expanded the P O Box 304, El Cerrito, CA 94530 footprint of Pt. Isabel. (This and [email protected] several other projects around the Bay helped Vol. 24 create support for Summer 2008 Shooting trap (l) and an archery “Ham Shoot” (r) at the MacAteer-Pe- No. 3 The Forge the San Pablo Avenue Sportsman’s Club on Pt. Isabel tris Act of 1965, The Offi cial Publication of the El Cerrito Historical Society, Copyright © 2008 which established the BCDC, or Bay Conservation and Development Commission). Santa Fe, of course, built a rail spur to the development to provide a direct connection to their transcontinen- tal mainline. Once these preparations were complete, Santa Fe sat back and waited for the buyers OUR NEXT MEETING: 12 NOON SUNDAY, JULY 20TH to line up. However, the fi rst lot was not sold until 1963, when the old Co-op grocery store chain PICNIC AT HUBER PARK ON TERRACE DRIVE bought a lot for a large warehouse it needed. In the early 1970s the Postal Service chose the site for the huge bulk mail facility that still operates today. A condition of the building permit for the bulk mail facility was that the Federal Government President’s Message had to provide shoreline access for the public. Once the public saw the fantastic vistas available Our next meeting, at Noon on Sunday, July 20th in Huber Park, will be our annual pot- from the shoreline the popularity of the area grew rapidly.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Ofthe Hoffman Marsh
    Vegetation of the Hoffman Marsh Post Restoration of 1984 Walter Alexander Introduction Hoffman Marsh is an intertidal salt marsh, located in the southern-most part of the City of Richmond (Figure 1). The 40-acre Marsh is part of the original Bay margin. Such areas as this are rare, because over 85 per cent of the Bay's marshes and tidal flats have been filled In over the last hundred years. Hoffman Marsh has also experienced modifications due to landfilling around its perimeter. Construction of a dike to support a sewer line resulted in the isolation of the southern portion of the Marsh (Figure 2). This southern section, the "study site," is the area on which I will focus my study. The remaining portion of the Marsh, the "main marsh," is connected to San Francisco Bay by a 15-foot wide channel inlet. The channel provides Due to state and federal law requiring legal compensation or "mitigation" for the development of environmentally significant land, the California Department of Transportation (CalTrans) in 1984 did some restoration work in the southern portion (study site) of the Hoffman Marsh, as compensation for the widening of Highway 17 (now 1-580) (Craig, 1985). The restoration was intended to increase water circulation through the study site. Because of unforeseen problems, only portions of the restoration project were completed. Craig (1985) studied the vegetation in the southern part of the Marsh prior to the rehabilitation project. My study will be a follow up to Craig's. By identifying the species present today and calculating their frequency, I hope to identify the changes, if any.
    [Show full text]
  • California Clapper Rail ( Rallus Longirostris Obsoletus ) TE-807078-10
    2009 Annual Report: California Clapper Rail ( Rallus longirostris obsoletus ) TE-807078-10 Submitted to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento December 16, 2009 Submitted by PRBO Conservation Science Leonard Liu 1, Julian Wood 1, and Mark Herzog 1 1PRBO Conservation Science, 3820 Cypress Drive #11, Petaluma, CA 94954 Contact: [email protected] Introduction The California Clapper Rail ( Rallus longirostris obsoletus ) is one of the most endangered species in California. The species is dependent on tidal wetlands, which have decreased over 75% from the historical extent in San Francisco Bay. A complete survey of its population and distribution within the San Francisco Bay Estuary was begun in 2005. In 2009, PRBO Conservation Science (PRBO) completed the fifth year of field work designed to provide an Estuary-wide abundance estimate and examine the temporal and spatial patterns in California Clapper Rail populations. Field work was performed in collaboration with partners conducting call-count surveys at complementary wetlands (Avocet Research Associates [ARA], California Department of Fish and Game, California Coastal Conservancy’s Invasive Spartina Project [ISP], and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). This report details PRBO’s California Clapper Rail surveys in 2009 under U.S. Fish and Wildlife service permit TE-807078-10. A more detailed report synthesizing 2009 and 2010 survey results from PRBO and its partners is forthcoming. Methods Call-count surveys were initiated January 15 and continued until May 6. All sites (Table 1) were surveyed 3 times by experienced permitted biologists using a point transect method, with 10 minutes per listening station. Listening stations primarily were located at marsh edges, levees bordering and within marshes, boardwalks, boat-accessible channels within the marsh, and in the case of 6 marshes in the North Bay, foot access within the marsh.
    [Show full text]