DOCSLIB.ORG

Protesting As a Terrorist Offense RIGHTS the Arbitrary Use of Terrorism Laws to Prosecute and Incarcerate Demonstrators in Turkey WATCH

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Protesting As a Terrorist Offense RIGHTS the Arbitrary Use of Terrorism Laws to Prosecute and Incarcerate Demonstrators in Turkey WATCH Turkey HUMAN Protesting as a Terrorist Offense RIGHTS The Arbitrary Use of Terrorism Laws to Prosecute and Incarcerate Demonstrators in Turkey WATCH Protesting as a Terrorist Offense The Arbitrary Use of Terrorism Laws to Prosecute and Incarcerate Demonstrators in Turkey Copyright © 2010 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-708-6 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org November 2010 1-56432-708-6 Protesting as a Terrorist Offense The Arbitrary Use of Terrorism Laws to Prosecute and Incarcerate Demonstrators in Turkey I. Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 Key Recommendations ..........................................................................................................6 Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 7 II. Background .................................................................................................................... 9 Conflict and Kurdish Rights in Southeast Turkey .................................................................... 9 Minority Rights in Turkey ..................................................................................................... 10 The AKP Government’s “Democratic Opening” and Minority Rights ...................................... 12 III. A Culture of Political Protest ......................................................................................... 15 IV. Terrorism laws and Demonstrators .............................................................................. 19 Terrorism Offenses in the 2005 Turkish Penal Code and the 2006 Revisions to the Anti-Terror Law ..................................................................................................................................... 19 The Case Law on Articles 220/6 and 314/2-3: The Felat Özer Case ....................................... 23 Background to the Özer Case: The Diyarbakir Protests of March 28 to 30, 2006 ............. 23 The General Criminal Board of the Court of Cassation Decision in the Özer Case ............ 25 Legal Amendments in July 2010 Concerning Child Demonstrators ........................................ 29 Statistics on Prosecutions of Child Demonstrators under Terrorism Laws ............................. 33 Lack of Detailed Statistics on Prosecutions of Demonstrators under Terrorism Laws ............ 35 V. Restricting the Rights to Freedom of Assembly and Expression ..................................... 36 Case of Veysi Kaya .............................................................................................................. 36 Case of Murat Işıkırık ........................................................................................................... 38 Case of Mehmet Kocakaya and Others................................................................................. 39 Case of Three Dicle University Students Campaigning for the Right to Mother Tongue Education............................................................................................................................ 40 Cases of Vesile Tadik, Medeni Aydın, and Selahattin Erden ................................................. 42 Case of Rihan Yıldız ............................................................................................................. 45 VI. Stone-Throwing Equated with PKK Membership: Disproportionate Charges and Sentences ........................................................................................................................ 47 Case of Feyzi Aslan, Fatma Gökhan, and Tufan Yıldırım ........................................................ 47 Case of H.A. ........................................................................................................................ 48 Case of B.S.......................................................................................................................... 49 VII. Convictions Based Solely on Police Identification ....................................................... 52 Case of Murat Baran ............................................................................................................ 52 Case of Abdulcelil Karaş ...................................................................................................... 53 Case of Salih Özbek, Seyithan Akbal and Others ................................................................. 53 Case of Ramazan Uçgün and İdris Üzen ............................................................................... 54 Case of M.Ö. and İ.S. ........................................................................................................... 55 VIII. Human Rights Violations ........................................................................................... 58 Freedom of Expression and Assembly ................................................................................. 58 Principles of Legality, Fair Trial and Due Process ................................................................. 60 UN Special Rapporteur’s Concerns about Vaguely Worded Terrorism Laws .......................... 62 IX. Specific Concerns Related to Prosecution of Child Demonstrators ................................ 64 Pre-trial Detention of Children ............................................................................................. 64 Ill-Treatment and Procedural Irregularities in the Handling of Child Suspects ...................... 66 X. Recommendations ........................................................................................................ 69 To the Turkish Government ................................................................................................. 69 To the Judiciary ................................................................................................................... 70 To the Police and Prosecuting Authorities ............................................................................ 70 To Turkey’s International Partners, including the European Union and the United States ..... 71 Appendix: Translations of Relevant Articles: 2005 Turkish Penal Code and 2006 Revision to the Anti-Terror Law ........................................................................................................... 72 Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................ 74 I. Summary In Turkey, many hundreds of people currently face prosecution, or are serving substantial sentences for terrorism convictions. Their “crime” was to engage in peaceful protest, or to throw stones or burn a tire at a protest. Legal amendments since 2005, along with case law since 2008, have allowed courts in Turkey to convict demonstrators under the harshest terrorism laws, by invoking two articles of the Turkish Penal Code in combination with the Anti-Terror Law. In July 2010, as this report was being finalized, the government passed legal amendments to improve the treatment of child demonstrators; but this report focuses mainly on adult demonstrators, whose treatment remains harsh, disproportionate and ultimately violates several human rights norms. The vast majority of demonstrators currently being prosecuted under terrorism laws is Kurdish, and the laws are usually invoked in the mainly Kurdish-populated areas of southeast Turkey, or in Adana and Mersin and other cities with large Kurdish populations. People whose writings and commentary on “the Kurdish question” in Turkey support positions perceived to be similar to those of the outlawed armed Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) have long faced particularly harsh punishment under Turkish law. Now the courts are applying the same or even harsher punishments to regular people who take to the streets to demonstrate support for opinions the authorities perceive to be similar to those of the PKK. While many of the prosecutions discussed in this report involve allegations of stone- throwing or tire-burning at demonstrations, the government’s increasingly harsh punishment of Kurdish demonstrators does not appear to be a response to demonstrators’ violent acts, but rather to their perceived ideological support for the PKK. The present laws fall foul of the standards required by human rights law and the rule of law that criminal offenses must be defined precisely and in a foreseeable manner (the requirement of legality). Their application in the manner documented in this report amounts to an arbitrary use of criminal law in violation of international human rights standards and the rule of law. The
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Baro Bülteni İlkbahar 2017
    113 DİYARBAKIR BAROSU BÜLTENİ Diyarbakır Barosu Adına İmtiyaz Sahibi Av. Ahmet ÖZMEN/ Baro Başkanı Sorumlu Yazı İşleri Müdürü Av. Cihan ÜLSEN Yayın Kurulu Av. Mehmet AKBAŞ Av. Kamuran KURTAR Av. Baran ÖZTÜRK Av. Şiraz BARAN Av. Mürsel EKİCİ Editör Av. M. Neşet GİRASUN Yönetim Yeri Diyarbakır Barosu Adliye Sarayı Tel: 0412 224 44 41 Fax: 0412 228 22 09 Web www.diyarbakirbarosu.org.tr E-Posta basinyayin@diyarbakırbarosu.org.tr Tasarım&Baskı A grafik: 0412 237 27 07 Bu dergi içeriğindeki tüm yazı ve resimler kaynak gösterilmeksizin ve izin alınmaksızın kullanılmaz. Tüm ya- zıların sorumluluğu yazarlarına aittir. İÇİNDEKİLER 04 İÇ GÜVENLİK PAKETİNE KARŞI BAROLAR DİYARBAKIR’DA YÜRÜDÜ 06 BAROMUZUN MAKALE KOBANÊ ZİYARETİ ETKİNLİKLER 04-14 15 10 HAYATIN TOPACI PANEL-SEMİNER NEWROZ AV. CİHAN İPEK 31-34 RESEPSİYONU 2015 KURS 18 13 TARİHTE BASIN AÇIKLAMASI 43-62 İÇ GÜVENLİK PAKETİNE KARŞI DİYARBAKIR BAROSU BARO BAŞKANLARI ANKARA’DA AV. HÜSEYİN TAYFUN YÜRÜDÜ GENEL KURUL 63-65 14 20 ZİMAN Û HEST EZÎDÎLERİ ZİYARET AV. FAHRİ KARAKOYUNLU HABERLER 66-71 29 22 KURUM AVUKATLARININ MOBBİNG / SORUNLARI İŞYERİNDE PSİKOLOJİK TACİZ AV. AHMET DAĞ 72-77 35 ZİYARETLER KAYIP YAKINLARIYLA 24 300. OTURMA EYLEMİNDEYDİK CİNSEL SUÇLARDA YARGISAL MÜSAMAHA, BİR YARGI KLASİĞİ KÜLTÜR-SANAT 78-79 39 AV. MÜZEYYEN NERGİZ ENFAL KANUN TEKLİFİ 27 YEMİN TÖRENLERİ 80-81 HAK İLE ADALET KAVRAMININ 42 İLİŞKİSİ VE UYGULAMASI AV. SIDKI ZİLAN STAJYER AVUKATLARLA BASINDA TANIŞMA YEMEĞİ 82-84 BAROMUZ Ahmet ÖZMEN / Baro Başkanı Saygıdeğer meslektaşlarım, Asla yerini dolduramayacağımız, yılmaz bir edilmesi ile karşı karşıya kalınmıştır. Sur, Silvan, insan hakları savunucusu ebedi Başkanımız Tahir Derik, Nusaybin, Silopi, Yüksekova, Cizre ve Şırnak Elçi’nin katledilmesinin ardından yaptığımız 45.
    [Show full text]
  • The Functioning of Democratic Institutions in Turkey
    http://assembly.coe.int Doc. 15272 21 April 2021 The functioning of democratic institutions in Turkey Report1 Committee on the Honouring of Obligations and Commitments by Member States of the Council of Europe (Monitoring Committee) Co-rapporteurs: Mr Thomas HAMMARBERG, Sweden, Socialists, Democrats and Greens Group, and Mr John HOWELL, United Kingdom, European Conservatives Group and Democratic Alliance Summary The Monitoring Committee is deeply concerned about recent developments in Turkey which have further undermined democracy, the rule of law and human rights. Procedures seeking to lift the parliamentary immunity of a third of the parliamentarians (overwhelmingly from opposition parties), the attempt to close the Peoples' Democratic Party (HDP) and the continued crackdown on its members put political pluralism and the functioning of democratic institutions at risk. The presidential decision of 20 March 2021 to withdraw from the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (CETS No.210, the Istanbul Convention) to combat violence against women and domestic violence is a regrettable step backwards, made without any parliamentary debate, which raises the question of the modalities of denunciation of conventions in democratic societies. The committee also urges the immediate release of Selahattin Demirtaş and Osman Kavala following the final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. In order to reverse these worrying trends, the Turkish authorities should seize the opportunity of implementing the Human Rights Action Plan and revising the legislation on elections and political parties to take meaningful steps, put an end to the judicial harassment of opposition and dissenting voices, improve freedom of expression and media and restore the independence of the judiciary, in co-operation with the Council of Europe 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Diyarbakır Batman Siirt Development Project 2010
    REPUBLIC OF TURKEY MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND RURAL AFFAIRS Diyarbakır Batman Siirt Development Project IFAD Loan No 718 –TR 2010 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT MARCH 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 ....................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 GENERAL INFORMATION .......................................................................................... 6 1.1.1. Project Area .......................................................................................................... 6 1.1.2.Project Target Group ............................................................................................. 7 1.1.3.Objectives of the Project ....................................................................................... 7 1.1.4. Components of the Project ................................................................................... 7 1.1.4.1. Component A – Village Development Program ................................................. 7 1.1.4.2. Component B – Rural Economic Growth ........................................................... 8 1.1.4.3. Component C – Capacity Building for Employment .......................................... 8 SECTION 2 ....................................................................................................................... 9 2.1. Activities Realized in 2010 by Components ............................................................. 9 2.1.1. Component A – Village Improvement Program ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Interpreting the PKK's Signals in Europe
    PERSPECTIVES ON TERRORISM Volume II, Issue 11 Interpreting the PKK’s Signals in Europe By Vera Eccarius-Kelly ince the Kurdish Worker’s Party (PKK) unexpectedly abducted three German hikers near Mt. Ararat in Turkey on 8 July 2008, and then released them on 20 July, intelligence sources in Europe have in- tensified their surveillance of PKK operatives among members of the particularly numerous Kurdish S Diaspora in Germany.[1] According to German newspaper reports, the PKK demanded that in ex- change for the release of the hikers “Berlin stop its hostile politics towards the Kurds and the PKK in Ger- many”.[2] While the exact purpose of the abduction requires further analysis, it is clear that it was the armed branch of the PKK, known as the People’s Defense Forces (HPG), that kidnapped the German hikers at their Mt. Ararat encampment at 10,500 feet in the evening hours—only to release them unharmed some two weeks later.[3] Questions Related to an Abduction Several questions preoccupy security analysts in relation to this abduction. How should this event be inter- preted in Europe, and particularly in Germany? What signals did the PKK send? And, most importantly, is the PKK entering a renewed phase of high intensity activism and terrorism in Europe? This essay aims to provide a brief analysis of the often confusing and contradictory messages sent by European Kurdish circles.[4] Despite convoluted interpretations of Kurdish demands that are linked to a lack of unity among the many Kurdish organizations in Europe, it is possible to disentangle the underlying messages.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Routes to an Impasse: Understanding Turkey's
    Two Routes to an Impasse: Understanding Turkey’s Kurdish Policy Ayşegül Aydin Cem Emrence turkey project policy paper Number 10 • December 2016 policy paper Number 10, December 2016 About CUSE The Center on the United States and Europe (CUSE) at Brookings fosters high-level U.S.-Europe- an dialogue on the changes in Europe and the global challenges that affect transatlantic relations. As an integral part of the Foreign Policy Studies Program, the Center offers independent research and recommendations for U.S. and European officials and policymakers, and it convenes seminars and public forums on policy-relevant issues. CUSE’s research program focuses on the transforma- tion of the European Union (EU); strategies for engaging the countries and regions beyond the frontiers of the EU including the Balkans, Caucasus, Russia, Turkey, and Ukraine; and broader European security issues such as the future of NATO and forging common strategies on energy security. The Center also houses specific programs on France, Germany, Italy, and Turkey. About the Turkey Project Given Turkey’s geopolitical, historical and cultural significance, and the high stakes posed by the foreign policy and domestic issues it faces, Brookings launched the Turkey Project in 2004 to foster informed public consideration, high‐level private debate, and policy recommendations focusing on developments in Turkey. In this context, Brookings has collaborated with the Turkish Industry and Business Association (TUSIAD) to institute a U.S.-Turkey Forum at Brookings. The Forum organizes events in the form of conferences, sem- inars and workshops to discuss topics of relevance to U.S.-Turkish and transatlantic relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing the Aspects of International Migration in Turkey by Using 2000
    MiReKoc MIGRATION RESEARCH PROGRAM AT THE KOÇ UNIVERSITY ______________________________________________________________ MiReKoc Research Projects 2005-2006 Analyzing the Aspects of International Migration in Turkey by Using 2000 Census Results Yadigar Coşkun Address: Kırkkonoaklar Mah. 202. Sokak Utku Apt. 3/1 06610 Çankaya Ankara / Turkey Email: [email protected] Tel: +90. 312.305 1115 / 146 Fax: +90. 312. 311 8141 Koç University, Rumelifeneri Yolu 34450 Sarıyer Istanbul Turkey Tel: +90 212 338 1635 Fax: +90 212 338 1642 Webpage: www.mirekoc.com E.mail: [email protected] Table of Contents Abstract....................................................................................................................................................3 List of Figures and Tables .......................................................................................................................4 Selected Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................5 1. Introduction..........................................................................................................................................1 2. Literature Review and Possible Data Sources on International Migration..........................................6 2.1 Data Sources on International Migration Data in Turkey..............................................................6 2.2 Studies on International Migration in Turkey..............................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • The Mio-Eugeosynclinal Thrust Interface and Related Petroleum Implications in the Sason-Baykan Area, Southeast Turkey
    Scholars' Mine Doctoral Dissertations Student Theses and Dissertations 1972 The mio-eugeosynclinal thrust interface and related petroleum implications in the Sason-Baykan Area, Southeast Turkey Ismail Özkaya Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/doctoral_dissertations Part of the Geology Commons Department: Geosciences and Geological and Petroleum Engineering Recommended Citation Özkaya, Ismail, "The mio-eugeosynclinal thrust interface and related petroleum implications in the Sason- Baykan Area, Southeast Turkey" (1972). Doctoral Dissertations. 198. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/doctoral_dissertations/198 This thesis is brought to you by Scholars' Mine, a service of the Missouri S&T Library and Learning Resources. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE MIO- EUGEOSYNCLINAL THRUST INTERFACE AND RELATED PETROLEUM IMPLICATIONS IN THE SASON-BAYKAN AREA, SOUTHEAST TURKEY by ISMAIL OZKAYA, 194 A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-ROLLA In Partial Fulfi I lment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in GEOLOGY 1972 p ·' ~&IA-~f ~ i i ABSTRACT A detailed investigation of the stratigraphy, structure and petroleum geology of the Sason-Baykan region in 600 square km area of the thrust belt of southeast Turkey was completed at a scale 1: 25 000. Geosynclinal sediments within the area were redated. Results of field study indicate a massive plate of metamorphic rocks and crystal I ine limestones was thrust southward over geosynclinal sediments. These in turn were thrust over the southern marginal basin deposits.
    [Show full text]
  • Protesting As a Terrorist Offense RIGHTS the Arbitrary Use of Terrorism Laws to Prosecute and Incarcerate Demonstrators in Turkey WATCH
    Turkey HUMAN Protesting as a Terrorist Offense RIGHTS The Arbitrary Use of Terrorism Laws to Prosecute and Incarcerate Demonstrators in Turkey WATCH Protesting as a Terrorist Offense The Arbitrary Use of Terrorism Laws to Prosecute and Incarcerate Demonstrators in Turkey Copyright © 2010 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-708-6 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org November 2010 1-56432-708-6 Protesting as a Terrorist Offense The Arbitrary Use of Terrorism Laws to Prosecute and Incarcerate Demonstrators in Turkey I. Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 Key Recommendations ..........................................................................................................6 Methodology ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Historical Overview
    NOTES 1 Historical Overview 1. Possibly the two best studies of the Kurds in English remain Bruinessen, Agha, Shaikh and State; and McDowall, A Modern History of the Kurds. More recently, see Romano, The Kurdish Nationalist Movement; and Natali, The Kurds and the State. Portions of this chapter originally appeared in other articles and chapters I have published including “The Kurdish Problem in International Politics,” in Joseph, Turkey and the European Union, pp. 96–121. 2. For further discussions of the size of the Kurdish population, see McDowall, Modern History of the Kurds, pp. 3–5; Bruinessen, Agha, Shaikh and State, pp. 14–15; and Izady, The Kurds, pp. 111–20. For a detailed analysis that lists considerably smaller figures for Turkey, see Mutlu, “Ethnic Kurds in Turkey,” pp. 517–41. 3. For a solid study of the Sheikh Said revolt, see Olson, The Emergence of Kurdish Nationalism. 4. For a recent detailed analysis of the Kurdish problem in Turkey, see Ozcan, Turkey’s Kurds. 5. “The Sun also Rises in the South East,” pp. 1–2. 6. For a meticulous analysis of the many problems involved, see Yildiz, The Kurds in Turkey, as well as my analysis in chapter 5 of this book. 7. “Ozkok: Biggest Crisis of Trust with US” Turkish Daily News, July 7, 2003; and Nicholas Kralev, “U.S. Warns Turkey against Operations in Northern Iraq.” Washington Times, July 8, 2003. 8. For recent detailed analysis of the Kurdish problem in Iraq, see Stansfield, Iraqi Kurdistan. 140 NOTES 9. For Henry Kissinger’s exact words, see “The CIA Report the President Doesn’t Want You to Read,” The Village Voice, February 16, 1976, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Defenders in Turkey a Report by the International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights (IHF)I
    HONORARY CHAIRMAN ADVISORY BOARD (CHAIR) PRESIDENT Yuri Orlov Karl von Schwarzenberg Ulrich Fischer EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE VICE PRESIDENT Aaron Rhodes Holly Cartner Srdjan Dizdarević Bjørn Engesland DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TREASURER Brigitte Dufour Vasilika Hysi Stein-Ivar Aarsæther Krassimir Kanev Ferenc Köszeg Wickenburgg. 14/7, A-1080 Vienna, Austria; Tel +43-1-408 88 22; Fax 408 88 22-50 e-mail: [email protected] – internet: http://www.ihf-hr.org Bank account: Bank Austria Creditanstalt, 0221-00283/00, BLZ 12000 Human Rights Defenders in Turkey i A Report by the International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights (IHF) 1. Introduction and Summary While there are still deficiencies in the Turkish legal framework and actual practice regarding freedom of assembly and association, Turkish legislation no longer includes provisions that would directly restrict human rights monitoring in Turkey. The situation of human right defenders in Turkey has somewhat improved in recent years. While some a number of human rights defenders have been tortured, intimidated and imprisoned, no killings have taken place. The regulative framework on associations and their activities has provided larger space for them to operate and the criminal law reforms increased the level of freedom of expression. However, severe problems remain in these areas, and the government’s way to address them is not consequent enough, although better than in the past. The international community has played a key role for enabling improvements regarding the working environment of human rights defenders in Turkey. In particular, the EU accession process has helped Turkey to work out, adopt and at least begin with the implementation of reforms in key human rights areas, which has resulted in the decrease of impediments to human rights activism in Turkey as one of the effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Think, Think... Freedom of Expression Weekly Bulletin (Issue 20/20, 15 May 2020)
    Think, think... Freedom of Expression Weekly Bulletin (Issue 20/20, 15 May 2020) What happened last week? ● Easing of measures in Turkey against the COVID-19 outbreak created worry around the scientific community. Shopping malls were reopened. Erdoğan announced the date of university entrance examinations, whereas the Turkish Football Federation (TFF) was left the initiative to decide whether soccer leagues will start or not. Local sources declare that there is significant increase in COVID-19 cases in many provinces, still. ● President Erdoğan repeated his claim that the fight against the outbreak is ongoing with success; this time indicating that the new post-pandemic world order must quickly be prepared for. Erdoğan further claimed that the foreign countries are preparing traps for the Turkish economy. Furthermore, the opposition was under Erdoğan’s target, as usual. “We will not let any malicious powers run riot - from FETO to PKK, from the Armenian and Greek lobbies to gulf-based conflict targets,” Erdoğan said, further ordering all assets of the Republican People’s Party (CHP) at the Turkish İş Bank to quickly be transferred to the Treasury. ● “Open-ended” threats shared by pro-government names through social media and press are ongoing. After Sevda Noyan’s claim that her family has “the means to kill 50 people at once, after the lists they’ve prepared” on the broadcast she attended on Ülke TV; a similar claim was shared on social media by Fatih Tezcan. An investigation was opened against Tezcan, but no legal action was taken against Noyan despite criminal complaints. ● There are claims that 44 convicts at Silivri Prison are infected with the Coronavirus.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy and Good Governance in the Black Sea Region Policy Report IV
    Franz-Lothar Altmann Johanna Deimel Armando García Schmidt Democracy and Good Governance in the Black Sea Region Policy Report IV www.blackseacom.eu An initiative of The Black eaS Trust for Regional Cooperation IV About this report The Black Sea region is increasingly becoming a priority on the international agenda. In fact, a regional approach is emerging as actors understand that common problems need to be addressed jointly. Nevertheless, cooperation efforts are hampered by a number of factors, such as uneven economic and political development within and among countries, nationalist forces, and longstanding animosities between regional players. In this context, it is imperative to foster sound policies aimed at strengthening dialogue and cooperation so as to contain and ultimately resolve conflicts with peaceful means. However, there is little policy-oriented research on the challenges and opportunities for cooperation in the Black Sea region. The Commission on the Black Sea aims to redress this imbalance by presenting a series of four policy-oriented reports which reassess the economic, social, regional political and military developments in the region. This report is the fourth one, providing a better understanding of the current status of transformation towards democracy and good governance in the countries of the Black Sea region. The Commission on the Black Sea does not take a collective position with this paper. This text represents only the views of its authors. About the authors Franz-Lothar Altmann is Associate Professor for Intercultural Relations, Bucharest State University. Among many other engagements he served as deputy director of the Southeast Institute in Munich and head of the research unit Western Balkans at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs (SWP).
    [Show full text]