©2011 Jessica R. Anderson Hughes ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

©2011 Jessica R. Anderson Hughes ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ©2011 Jessica R. Anderson Hughes ALL RIGHTS RESERVED FORCED PROSTITUTION: THE COMPETING AND CONTESTED USES OF THE CONCENTRATION CAMP BROTHEL by JESSICA R. ANDERSON HUGHES A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in History written under the direction of Professor Belinda Davis and approved by ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey May 2011 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION FORCED PROSTITUTION: THE COMPETING AND CONTESTED USES OF THE CONCENTRATION CAMP BROTHEL By JESSICA R. ANDERSON HUGHES Dissertation Director: Professor Belinda Davis This dissertation enhances and complicates the history of Nazi racial and sexual policies by examining the quotidian politics of ten brothels staffed by and for prisoners that operated in concentration camps in Germany and its occupied territories. Instituted in 1941 under the command of Heinrich Himmler with the goal of providing rewards for diligent labor among “prominent” male camp prisoners, the brothels constituted a unique space in which competing Nazi ideologies of race, power, and sex collided. This dissertation not only explores how the brothels functioned as part of a Nazi-inspired labor incentive program for “prominent” prisoners, but also reveals their unannounced functions, such as serving as laboratories of sexual experimentation for the “re- education” of homosexual prisoners. It shows too how prisoners instrumentalized sex and sexuality to their advantage. Although the majority of women and some men could not choose their level of participation in the brothel, in many instances they were able to use their time in the brothel to their advantage. For some female prisoners forced into ii prostitution and for male prisoners earning the privilege of brothel visits, sexual activity inside the brothel provided brief moments of intimacy within the dehumanizing atmosphere of the camps. Sexual activity behind the brothel doors thus became a reaffirmation of humanity for certain prisoners and a pivotal element of their survival strategy. This history of the brothels makes three crucial interventions. The first is a reconceptualization of the choices made by women forced into prostitution by problematizing concepts like “volunteerism” and “prostitute” in this setting, this study makes plain the circumstances surrounding the agency of these women. The second is to complicate and add to the literature on the “gray zone” and notions of “cooperation” under Nazi rule. The third is to provide a nuanced, detailed analysis of the functioning of sex, race, and power in Nazi Germany. This research transforms and adds to our understanding of the role of sex in Nazi policy. Despite the regime’s desire to harness sexuality, it proved that even in a closely controlled atmosphere, to be beyond the state’s control. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I have been mentally writing my acknowledgments for longer than I care to admit, so it is with a great sense of accomplishment that I finally see these words in print. This dissertation would not have been possible without my generous funding from Rutgers University, the Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst, and the American Association of University Women. Particular thanks go to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum for including me on the research expedition to the Red Cross International Tracing Services Archive in Bad Arolsen, Germany in 2008. The work I accomplished there is found on nearly every page of this dissertation. I am grateful to the faculty and staff in the history department at Rutgers, my academic home throughout my Ph.D. journey. Special thanks to the irreplaceable Dawn Ruskai who has helped me navigate through the redtape and roadblocks at Rutgers both while in residence and away. I thank my dissertation committee whose support and varied perspectives have shaped this project. Bonnie Smith’s insightful comments have helped me widen my perspective of histories of sexuality. She continues to inspire me to clarify and make bold claims. Paul Hanebrink has consistently provided me with concrete suggestions for furthering my work and I was lucky to work closely with him over the years, gaining invaluable insight into teaching. Atina Grossmann’s excellent comments and thought-provoking questions have been critical to the final revisions of this dissertation. I thank Belinda Davis for advising this project and for her simultaneous support and insistence on greater analysis and clarity in my work. I have been fortunate to be surrounded by so many fantastically intelligent, smart, and witty people during my tenure as a graduate student. I first thank my dear friend and iv unofficial mentor, Dorothee Brantz, for sharing her enthusiasm for German history with a young and clueless former field hockey player. Louisa Rice and Carmen Khair are not only excellent historians, but friends who were quick to laugh and always eager for adventure. Rebecca Scales spent countless hours on the phone with me as both a soundboard and a cheerleader through the heartbreaks and successes of this project. I am so grateful for our friendship. I thank my fellow Rutgers Germanists, Jennifer Miller, Laurie Marhoefer, and Carla MacDougall, for being the funniest and most fun-loving group of historians imaginable. I am grateful to Laurie Marhoefer’s characteristic good cheer and willingness to read endless drafts of my work and answer all of my Weimar questions. I first met Carla MacDougall on my recruiting trip to Rutgers and my experience has largely been shaped by our friendship. I thank her for sharing her love of Berlin with me and making it my second home. I am indebted to Megan Mackey, Kate Carroll, and Mary Brown for always being there to talk, laugh, and get one another through life’s ups and downs. Our friendships have always and continue to sustain me. I am blessed to have two incredibly smart and talented brothers whom I appreciate deeply. To Christopher and David, thank you for being such important parts of my life. My dear Inge provided me with a home away from home while in Germany. I am truly indebted to her for sharing our family history with me. It is with the deepest and most heartfelt gratitude that I express my love and thanks to my parents who have always loved me unconditionally and supported all of my endeavors. They are a monument of love, compassion, and generosity. I hope to live life as they have. There v exists no better example of what hard work, perseverance, and enthusiasm can achieve than my father. I thank him for setting the bar so unbelievably high. I am the daughter and granddaughter of extraordinary women. I hope my Grandma Ann and my Oma Emmy would see in me, if even just a little, some of their qualities. My Grandma Ann was the embodiment of intelligence and grace and my Oma Emmy was a woman of incredible bravery and faith. I know that these two women would have been so pleased to see their granddaughter earn her Ph.D. My mother was the first woman in her family to attend college. A familiar story told in our family is how her mother marched her tiny 4’10” frame to the front of the ceremony and asked them to pause the commencement so that she could take a picture of her daughter with diploma in hand. Soon after, my mother continued to make her mom proud by earning her Master’s Degree. My mother instilled within me a love for learning and the notion that any dream was possible. I hope she is as proud of me as her mother was of her. Finally, I thank my very patient and loving husband Daniel. Thank you for always encouraging me and often making sacrifices for my work. Your kindness knows no bounds and for that I love you. You have lived with this dissertation everyday and its final completion is a testimony to our partnership. Our greatest achievement, Samuel Augustus, is so wonderfully and frightfully made that all other feats pale by comparison. You are both my heart. vi DEDICATION To my Mom and Dad vii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT…………………………………………………....................... .ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS…………………………………………………...iv DEDICATION……………………………………………………………….vi TABLE OF CONTENTS…………………………………………………... .viii LIST OF TABLES…………………………………………………………. .ix ILLUSTRATIONS………………………………………………………… .x INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………. .1 CHAPTER ONE Scourge or Necessity? The Evolution of Nazi Prostitution Policy………... .23 CHAPTER TWO Soliciting “Cooperation:” Recruiting the Camp Brothel Workforce………. .91 CHAPTER THREE Life in the Brothel………………………………………………………….. .133 CHAPTER FOUR Prisoner Johns: The Eager, the Reluctant, the Curious, and the Forced….....190 CHAPTER FIVE Instrumental Sex in the Concentration Camp Universe……………. …….....231 CONCLUSION……………………………………………………………...270 BIBLIOGRAPHY…………………………………………………………...277 CURRICULUM VITAE…………………………………………………….299 viii LIST OF TABLES Buchenwald Brothel…………………………………………………………208 ix LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Map of Gusen Concentration Camp…………………………………………86 Gusen Prisoner Brothel………………………………………………………87 Buchenwald Prisoner Brothel………………………………………………..88 Brothel Koberzimmer………………………………………………………..89 Waiting Room, Buchenwald Brothel………………………………………...90 x 1 Introduction In the spring of 1941, SS Reichsführer Heinrich Himmler returned from a visit to the I.G. Farben plant outside of Oświęcim, Poland, excited by what he had witnessed. I.G. Farben had successfully been raising labor productivity
Recommended publications
  • Holocaust : the Documentary Evidence / Introduction by Henry J
    D 804 .3 H655 1993 ..v** \ ”>k^:>00'° * k5^-;:^C ’ * o4;^>>o° • ’>fe £%' ’5 %^S' w> «* O p N-4 ^ y° ^ ^ if. S' * * ‘/c*V • • •#• O' * ^V^A. f ° V0r*V, »■ ^^hrJ 0 ° "8f °^; ^ " ^Y> »<<■ °H° %>*,-’• o/V’m*' ( ^ »1 * °* •<> ■ 11 • 0Vvi » » !■„ V " o « % Jr % > » *"'• f ;M’t W ;• jfe*-. w 4»Yv4-W-r ' '\rs9 - ^ps^fc 1 v-v « ^ o f SI ° ^SJJV o J o cS^f) 2 IISII - ?%^ * .v W$M : <yj>A. * * A A, o WfyVS? =» _ 0 c^'Tn ft / /, , *> -X- V^W/.ov o e b' j . &? \v 'Mi.»> 'Sswr o, J?<v.v w lv4><k\NJ * ^ ^ . °o \V<<> x<P o* Sffli: "£? iiPli5 XT i^sm” TT - W"» w *<|E5»; •J.oJ%P/ y\ %^p»# j*\ °*Ww; 4?% « ^WmW^O . *S° * l>t-»^\V, ” * CTo4;^o° * * : • o°^4oo° • V'O « •: v .••gpaV. \* :f •: K:#i K •#;o K il|:>C :#• !&: V ; ", *> Q *•a- vS#^.//'n^L;V *y* >wT<^°x- *** *jt 1' , ,»*y co ' >n 9 v3 ^S'J°'%‘,“'" V’t'^X,,“°y°>*e,°'S,',n * • • C\,'“K°,45»,-*<>A^'” **^*. f°C 8 ^\W- A/.fef;^ tM; i\ ^ # # ^ *J0g§S 4'°* ft V4°/ rv j- ^ O >?'V 7!&l'ev ❖ ft r Oo ^4#^irJ> 1fS‘'^s3:i ^ O >P-4* ^ rf-^ *2^70^ -r ^ ^ ._ * \44\§s> u _ ^,§<!, <K 4 L< « ,»9vyv%s« »,°o,'*»„;,* 4*0 “» o°, 1.0, -r X*MvV/'Sl'" *>4v >X'°*°y'(• > /4>-' K ** <T ^ r 4TSS "oz Vv «r >j,'j‘ cpS'a" WMW » » ,©fi^ * c^’tw °,ww * <^v4 *1 3 V/fF'-k^k z “y^3ts.\N ^ <V'’ ^V> , '~^>S/ ji^ * »j, o a> ’Cf' Q ,7—-.
    [Show full text]
  • Education with Testimonies, Vol.4
    Education with Testimonies, Vol.4 Education with Testimonies, Vol.4 INTERACTIONS Explorations of Good Practice in Educational Work with Video Testimonies of Victims of National Socialism edited by Werner Dreier | Angelika Laumer | Moritz Wein Published by Werner Dreier | Angelika Laumer | Moritz Wein Editor in charge: Angelika Laumer Language editing: Jay Sivell Translation: Christopher Marsh (German to English), Will Firth (Russian to English), Jessica Ring (German to English) Design and layout: ruf.gestalten (Hedwig Ruf) Photo credits, cover: Videotaping testimonies in Jerusalem in 2009. Eyewitnesses: Felix Burian and Netty Burian, Ammnon Berthold Klein, Jehudith Hübner. The testimonies are available here: www.neue-heimat-israel.at, _erinnern.at_, Bregenz Photos: Albert Lichtblau ISBN: 978-3-9818556-2-3 (online version) ISBN: 978-3-9818556-1-6 (printed version) © Stiftung „Erinnerung, Verantwortung und Zukunft” (EVZ), Berlin 2018 All rights reserved. The work and its parts are protected by copyright. Any use in other than legally authorized cases requires the written approval of the EVZ Foundation. The authors retain the copyright of their texts. TABLE OF CONTENTS 11 Günter Saathoff Preface 17 Werner Dreier, Angelika Laumer, Moritz Wein Introduction CHAPTER 1 – DEVELOPING TESTIMONY COLLECTIONS 41 Stephen Naron Archives, Ethics and Influence: How the Fortunoff Video Archive‘s Methodology Shapes its Collection‘s Content 52 Albert Lichtblau Moving from Oral to Audiovisual History. Notes on Praxis 63 Sylvia Degen Translating Audiovisual Survivor Testimonies for Education: From Lost in Translation to Gained in Translation 76 Éva Kovács Testimonies in the Digital Age – New Challenges in Research, Academia and Archives CHAPTER 2 – TESTIMONIES IN MUSEUMS AND MEMORIAL SITES 93 Kinga Frojimovics, Éva Kovács Tracing Jewish Forced Labour in the Kaiserstadt – A Tainted Guided Tour in Vienna 104 Annemiek Gringold Voices in the Museum.
    [Show full text]
  • SS-Totenkopfverbände from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia (Redirected from SS-Totenkopfverbande)
    Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history SS-Totenkopfverbände From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from SS-Totenkopfverbande) Navigation Not to be confused with 3rd SS Division Totenkopf, the Waffen-SS fighting unit. Main page This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. No cleanup reason Contents has been specified. Please help improve this article if you can. (December 2010) Featured content Current events This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding Random article citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (September 2010) Donate to Wikipedia [2] SS-Totenkopfverbände (SS-TV), rendered in English as "Death's-Head Units" (literally SS-TV meaning "Skull Units"), was the SS organization responsible for administering the Nazi SS-Totenkopfverbände Interaction concentration camps for the Third Reich. Help The SS-TV was an independent unit within the SS with its own ranks and command About Wikipedia structure. It ran the camps throughout Germany, such as Dachau, Bergen-Belsen and Community portal Buchenwald; in Nazi-occupied Europe, it ran Auschwitz in German occupied Poland and Recent changes Mauthausen in Austria as well as numerous other concentration and death camps. The Contact Wikipedia death camps' primary function was genocide and included Treblinka, Bełżec extermination camp and Sobibor. It was responsible for facilitating what was called the Final Solution, Totenkopf (Death's head) collar insignia, 13th Standarte known since as the Holocaust, in collaboration with the Reich Main Security Office[3] and the Toolbox of the SS-Totenkopfverbände SS Economic and Administrative Main Office or WVHA.
    [Show full text]
  • Information „Nacht Und Nebel“-Häftlinge “Night and Fog” Prisoners
    Information „Nacht und Nebel“-Häftlinge 9.3 “Night and Fog” Prisoners 2615 Zur Unterdrückung des Widerstands in To suppress resistance in the occupied den besetzten Gebieten ordnete Hitler territories, Hitler passed the “Night and am 7. Dezember 1941 im „Nacht und Fog” decree of December 7, 1941, which Nebel“-Erlass an, Widerstandstätigkeit called for the death penalty as general grundsätzlich mit dem Tod zu bestrafen. punishment for involvement in r esistance. Um die Abschreckung zu verstärken, soll- To increase intimidation, relatives were ten die Angehörigen über das Schicksal to remain in the dark about the fate of des Opfers im Unklaren gelassen werden. the victim. Prisoners not immediately Gefangene, die nicht sofort hingerichtet executed were deported to the territory wurden, deportierte man ins Reichsgebiet, of the Reich, where they were usually wo sie meist in Konzentrationslager ein- incarcerated in a concentration camp. gewiesen wurden. In summer 1944, over 2,200 “night and Ab Sommer 1944 kamen über 2 200 „Nacht fog” prisoners came to Dachau. They lived und Nebel“-Häftlinge in das KZ Dachau. in special barracks, were not allowed to Sie lebten in besonderen Baracken, durf- receive mail and were not sent to the ten keine Post empfangen und nicht in subcamps. die Außenlager entsandt werden. 2616 „im Ungewissen halten“ “uncertain about the fate” „Es ist der lange erwogene Wille des Führers, dass in den “It is, since a long time the pondered will of the Führer, besetzten Gebieten bei Angriffen gegen das Reich oder that in the case of attacks against the Reich or members die Besatzungsmacht den Tätern mit anderen Maßnahmen of the occupying forces in the occupied territories the begegnet werden soll als bisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Mauthausen-Gusen Concentration Camp System Varies Considerably from Source to Source
    Mauthausen-Gusen concentrationCoordinates: 48°15camp′32″N 14°30′04″E From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Mauthausen Concentration Camp (known from the summer of 1940 as Mauthausen- Gusen Concentration Camp) grew to become a large group of Nazi concentration camps that was built around the villages of Mauthausen and Gusen in Upper Austria, roughly 20 kilometres (12 mi) east of the city of Linz. Initially a single camp at Mauthausen, it expanded over time to become one of the The Mauthausen parade ground – a view largest labour camp complexes in German- towards the main gate controlled Europe.[1][2] Apart from the four main sub-camps at Mauthausen and nearby Gusen, more than 50 sub-camps, located throughout Austria and southern Germany, used the inmates as slave labour. Several subordinate camps of the KZ Mauthausen complex included quarries, munitions factories, mines, arms factories and Me 262 fighter-plane assembly plants.[3] In January 1945, the camps, directed from the central office in Mauthausen, contained roughly 85,000 inmates.[4] The death toll remains unknown, although most sources place it between 122,766 and 320,000 for the entire complex. The camps formed one of the first massive concentration camp complexes in Nazi Germany, and were the last ones to be liberated by the Western Allies or the Soviet Union. The two main camps, Mauthausen and Gusen I, were also the only two camps in the whole of Europe to be labelled as "Grade III" camps, which meant that they were intended to be the toughest camps for the "Incorrigible Political
    [Show full text]
  • A Catalan Voice from the Holocaust: Writer and Survivor of Mauthausen Joaquim Amat-Piniella Shatters Francoist Mandated Silence Maureen Tobin Stanley
    You are accessing the Digital Archive of the Esteu accedint a l'Arxiu Digital del Catalan Catalan Review Journal. Review By accessing and/or using this Digital A l’ accedir i / o utilitzar aquest Arxiu Digital, Archive, you accept and agree to abide by vostè accepta i es compromet a complir els the Terms and Conditions of Use available at termes i condicions d'ús disponibles a http://www.nacs- http://www.nacs- catalanstudies.org/catalan_review.html catalanstudies.org/catalan_review.html Catalan Review is the premier international Catalan Review és la primera revista scholarly journal devoted to all aspects of internacional dedicada a tots els aspectes de la Catalan culture. By Catalan culture is cultura catalana. Per la cultura catalana s'entén understood all manifestations of intellectual totes les manifestacions de la vida intel lectual i and artistic life produced in the Catalan artística produïda en llengua catalana o en les language or in the geographical areas where zones geogràfiques on es parla català. Catalan Catalan is spoken. Catalan Review has been Review es publica des de 1986. in publication since 1986. Parlo...’: A Catalan Voice from the Holocaust: Writer and Survivor of Mauthausen Joaquim Amat-Piniella Shatters Francoist Mandated Silence Maureen Tobin Stanley Catalan Review, Vol. XXI, (2007), p. 69- 86 'PARLO ... ': A CATALAN VOICE FROM THE HOLOCAUST: WRITER AND SURVIVOR OF MAUTHAUSEN JOAQUIM AMAT-PINIELLA SHATTERS FRANCO1ST MANDATED SILENCE':- MAURE EN TOBIN STANLEY ABSTRACT Following the retreat to France of half a million Spaniards in the winter of '38/39 and as a result of the Nazi occupation, 10,000-15,000 Spaniards were deported to concentration camps.
    [Show full text]
  • Nacht- Und Nebel"-Justiz. Die Mitwirkung Deutscher Strafgerichte an Der Bekämpfung Des Widerstandes in Den Besetzten Westeuropäischen Ländern 1942-1944
    LOTHAR GRUCHMANN „NACHT- UND NEBEL"-JUSTIZ. DIE MITWIRKUNG DEUTSCHER STRAFGERICHTE AN DER BEKÄMPFUNG DES WIDERSTANDES IN DEN BESETZTEN WESTEUROPÄISCHEN LÄNDERN 1942-1944 Während die Wehrmachtgerichte bei der Verfolgung des Widerstandes der Zivilbevöl­ kerung gegen die deutsche Besatzungsmacht in den besetzten sowjetischen Gebieten durch Hitlers Gerichtsbarkeits-Erlaß „Barbarossa" vom Mai 1941 von vornherein ausgeschlossen waren, blieben sie in den westeuropäischen Ländern und in Norwegen für die Ahndung von Straftaten der Einwohner gegen die deutsche Wehrmacht bis August 1944 zuständig, wenn ihnen dabei auch Himmlers Polizeiorgane in zuneh­ mendem Maße Konkurrenz machten. Zur Aburteilung von Beschuldigten aus diesen Ländern wurde ab 1942 auch die Strafjustiz im Reich herangezogen, wobei sich allerdings erweisen sollte, daß sie unter den Bedingungen, die ihr die politische Füh­ rung dabei auferlegte, für die Erfüllung dieser Aufgabe denkbar ungeeignet war. Als sich nach Beginn des Rußlandfeldzuges im Sommer 1941 die Widerstandshand­ lungen im besetzten Westeuropa mehrten, wurde u. a. eine Französin, die mehreren Personen zur Flucht in den unbesetzten Teil Frankreichs verholfen hatte, von einem deutschen Militärgericht zum Tode verurteilt. Hitler, der sich die Bestätigung von Todesurteilen gegen Frauen nichtdeutscher Staatsangehörigkeit aus den besetzten Westgebieten vorbehalten hatte1, begnadigte die Widerstandskämpferin zu einer Frei­ heitsstrafe, bestimmte aber gleichzeitig, daß sie heimlich nach Deutschland gebracht und dort von der Außenwelt völlig isoliert gehalten werden sollte. Er wollte damit verhindern, daß die Frau durch Vollstreckung des Todesurteils zur Märtyrerin ge­ macht würde, zugleich aber erreichen, daß ihr spurloses Verschwinden auf die Bevöl­ kerung abschreckend wirkte2. Als die Aktivität der Resistance weiter zunahm, ent­ schloß sich Hitler im September 1941, das Verfahren, die Täter aus ihrer besetzten 1 Vgl.
    [Show full text]
  • Holocaust Glossary
    Holocaust Glossary A ● Allies: 26 nations led by Great Britain, the United States, and the Soviet Union that opposed Germany, Italy, and Japan (known as the Axis powers) in World War II. ● Antisemitism: Hostility toward or hatred of Jews as a religious or ethnic group, often accompanied by social, economic, or political discrimination. (USHMM) ● Appellplatz: German word for the roll call square where prisoners were forced to assemble. (USHMM) ● Arbeit Macht Frei: “Work makes you free” is emblazoned on the gates at Auschwitz and was intended to deceive prisoners about the camp’s function (Holocaust Museum Houston) ● Aryan: Term used in Nazi Germany to refer to non-Jewish and non-Gypsy Caucasians. Northern Europeans with especially “Nordic” features such as blonde hair and blue eyes were considered by so-called race scientists to be the most superior of Aryans, members of a “master race.” (USHMM) ● Auschwitz: The largest Nazi concentration camp/death camp complex, located 37 miles west of Krakow, Poland. The Auschwitz main camp (Auschwitz I) was established in 1940. In 1942, a killing center was established at Auschwitz-Birkenau (Auschwitz II). In 1941, Auschwitz-Monowitz (Auschwitz III) was established as a forced-labor camp. More than 100 subcamps and labor detachments were administratively connected to Auschwitz III. (USHMM) Pictured right: Auschwitz I. B ● Babi Yar: A ravine near Kiev where almost 34,000 Jews were killed by German soldiers in two days in September 1941 (Holocaust Museum Houston) ● Barrack: The building in which camp prisoners lived. The material, size, and conditions of the structures varied from camp to camp.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PERSECUTION of HOMOSEXUALS in NAZI GERMANY Kaleb Cahoon HIST 495: Senior Seminar May 1, 2017
    THE PERSECUTION OF HOMOSEXUALS IN NAZI GERMANY Kaleb Cahoon HIST 495: Senior Seminar May 1, 2017 1 On May 6, 1933, a group of students from the College of Physical Education in Berlin arrived early in the morning to raid the office headquarters of the Institute for Sexual Research in Berlin. According to a contemporary anonymous report, the invading students “took up a military-style position in front of the house and then forced their way inside, with musical accompaniment… [and then] they smashed down the doors.”1 Once inside, the same group commenced to ransack the place: they “emptied inkwells, pouring ink onto various papers and carpets, and then set about the private bookcases” and then “took with them what struck them as suspicious, keeping mainly to the so-called black list.”2 Later that day, after the students had left “large piles of ruined pictures and broken glass” in their wake, a contingent of Storm Troopers arrived to complete the operation by confiscating nearly ten thousand books that they subsequently burned three days later.3 This raid was part of an overall campaign to purge “books with an un-German spirit from Berlin libraries,” undertaken early in the regime of the Third Reich. Their target, the Institute for Sexual Research founded by the pioneering German sexologist Magnus Hirschfeld, was one of the premier centers of progressive thought concerning human sexuality – most notably homosexuality – in the world.4 This episode raises a number of questions, including why Nazi leaders deemed this organization to possess “an un-German spirit” that thus warranted a thorough purge so early in the regime.5 The fact that Hirschfeld, like many other leading sexologists in Germany, was Jewish and that many Nazis thus regarded the burgeoning field of “Sexualwissenschaft, or the science of sex,” as “Jewish science” likely 1 “How Magnus Hirschfeld’s Institute for Sexual Science Was Demolished and Destroyed,” (1933) in The Third Reich Sourcebook, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberation & Revenge
    Episode Guide: Orders & Initiatives September 1941–March 1942 Jews from the Lódz ghetto board deportation trains for the Chelmno death camp. Overview "Orders and Initiatives" (Disc 1, Title 2, 48:27) highlights the crucial decision-making period of the Holocaust and reveals the secret plans of Adolf Hitler, Heinrich Himmler, and Reinhard Heydrich to annihilate the Jews. At a conference in January 1942, the Nazis plan how to achieve their goals. The first gas chambers are built at Auschwitz and the use of Zyklon B is developed. German doctors arrive to oversee each transport, deciding who should live and who should die. In the program's Follow-up Discussion (Disc 2, Bonus Features, Title 8, 7:18), Linda Ellerbee interviews Claudia Koonz, professor of history at Duke University and author of The Nazi Conscience (Belknap, 2003), and Edward Kissi, professor of Africana studies at the University of South Florida and an expert on international relations and human rights. Target Audience: Grades 9-12 social studies, history, and English courses Student Learning Goals • Citing specific events and decisions, analyze how the Nazi mission changed from September 1941 to March 1942, explaining the reasons for the changes. • Compare Auschwitz I and Auschwitz II (Birkenau) in terms of location, purpose, population, and living conditions. • Identify the incremental steps the Nazis used to isolate Jews and deport them from their home environments to death camps, and the effects on Jews, their neighbors, and the Nazis at each stage. • Summarize how and why many European nations collaborated with the Nazis, including their history of antisemitism.
    [Show full text]
  • Roma and Sinti Under-Studied Victims of Nazism
    UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM CENTER FOR ADVANCED HOLOCAUST STUDIES Roma and Sinti Under-Studied Victims of Nazism Symposium Proceedings W A S H I N G T O N , D. C. Roma and Sinti Under-Studied Victims of Nazism Symposium Proceedings CENTER FOR ADVANCED HOLOCAUST STUDIES UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM 2002 The assertions, opinions, and conclusions in this occasional paper are those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect those of the United States Holocaust Memorial Council or of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Third printing, July 2004 Copyright © 2002 by Ian Hancock, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by Michael Zimmermann, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by Guenter Lewy, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by Mark Biondich, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by Denis Peschanski, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by Viorel Achim, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by David M. Crowe, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Contents Foreword .....................................................................................................................................i Paul A. Shapiro and Robert M. Ehrenreich Romani Americans (“Gypsies”).......................................................................................................1 Ian
    [Show full text]
  • Zum Selbstverständnis Von Frauen Im Konzentrationslager. Das Lager Ravensbrück
    Zum Selbstverständnis von Frauen im Konzentrationslager. Das Lager Ravensbrück. von der Fakultät I Geisteswissenschaften der Technischen Universität Berlin genehmigte Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktorin der Philosophie vorgelegt von Silke Schäfer aus Berlin D 83 Berichter: Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Benz Berichterin: Prof. Dr. Johanna Bleker (FUB) Tag der Wissenschaftlichen Aussprache 06. Februar 2002 1 Inhaltsverzeichnis Einleitung 4 1 Problemfelder und Nachkriegsprozesse 11 1.1 Begriffsklärung 11 1.1.1 Sprache 13 1.1.2 Das nationalsozialistische "Frauenbild" 14 1.1.3 Täterinnen 18 1.1.4 Kategorien für Frauen im Konzentrationslager 19 1.1.5 Auswahlkriterien 26 1.2 Strafverfolgung 28 1.2.1 Militärgerichtsverfahren 29 1.2.2 Die Hamburger Ravensbrück-Prozesse 32 1.2.3 Strafverfahren vor deutschen Gerichten 38 1.2.4 Strafverfahren vor anderen Gerichten 40 2 Topographie 42 2.1 Vorgeschichte 42 2.1.1 Moringen 42 2.1.2 Lichtenburg 45 2.2 Das Frauen-KZ Ravensbrück 47 2.2.1 "Alltagsleben" 52 2.2.2 Solidarität 59 2.3 Arbeit 62 2.3.1 Arbeitskommandos 63 2.3.2 Wirtschaftliche Ausbeutung 64 2.3.3 Lagerbordelle und SS-Bordelle 69 2.4 Aufseherinnen 75 2.4.1 Strafen 77 2.5 Lager bei Ravensbrück 80 2.5.1 Männerlager 81 2.5.2 Jugendschutzlager Uckermark 81 3 Die Medizin 86 3.1 Der Blick auf die Mediziner 86 3.1.1 Das Revier 87 3.2 Medizinische Experimente 89 3.2.1 Sulfonamidversuche / Knochen-, 91 Muskel- und Nervenoperation Sulfonamidversuche 93 Knochen-, Muskel- und Nervenoperation 104 Versuche 108 3.3 Sterilisation 110 3.3.1 Geburten und Kinder 115 3.4 Das medizinische Personal 123 3.4.1 NS-Ärztinnen - Lebensskizzen 125 Jantzen geb.
    [Show full text]