Investigating the Molecular Basis of Resistance and Pyrethroid Selectivity at Acarine Sodium Channels

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Investigating the Molecular Basis of Resistance and Pyrethroid Selectivity at Acarine Sodium Channels ORBIT-OnlineRepository ofBirkbeckInstitutionalTheses Enabling Open Access to Birkbeck’s Research Degree output Investigating the molecular basis of resistance and pyrethroid selectivity at acarine sodium channels https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/40252/ Version: Full Version Citation: Blockley, Alix Dawn (2017) Investigating the molecular basis of resistance and pyrethroid selectivity at acarine sodium channels. [The- sis] (Unpublished) c 2020 The Author(s) All material available through ORBIT is protected by intellectual property law, including copy- right law. Any use made of the contents should comply with the relevant law. Deposit Guide Contact: email INVESTIGATING THE MOLECULAR BASIS OF RESISTANCE AND PYRETHROID SELECTIVITY AT ACARINE SODIUM CHANNELS Alix Dawn Blockley MBiol (Hons) Thesis submitted to Birkbeck, University of London for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2016 1 Declaration I declare that the work in this thesis is the candidates own. Signed: Alix Dawn Blockley 2 Acknowledgements Firstly, this work would not have been possible without the guidance of my wonderful supervisory team: Andreas Turberg, Bonnie Wallace, Emyr Davies, and in particular Lin Field and Martin Williamson. I thank you all for your advice and encouragement when it just would not work. Again. You have taught me how to supervise a student well. Thank you for always having an open door when I needed it. I particularly thank my “adoptive” supervisor, Ian Mellor at the University of Nottingham. Your advice, practical encouragement and supportive words, particularly when I was low on time and high on leak currents, made this work possible. I would also like to thank all those I have worked with at Rothamsted Research in the Insect Molecular Biology group and beyond. Thank you for making each day in the lab a good day. In particular, I thank Joel González-Cabrera, for his guidance at the start of my PhD, for providing the native Varroa destructor VGSC, and critically for sharing the frustrations of cloning arthropod VGSCs. I also thank Andrew Mead for his help with analysis of bioassay data and Rob King for bioinformatics support. To my lab group at Nottingham University: Rohit Patel, Neville Ngum, Abu Izuddin, Mahmoud Sherif, Maria Kor and David Richards. Thank you so much for the shared commiserations and congratulations, and for making me part of the team. In particular, I thank John Grzeskowiak for his friendship and for teaching me the basics of electrophysiology. I hope we can co-supervise a student or twenty! Lastly, I thank my husband James for his love and support, for keeping his phone on, washing my bike, and for not going to the Peaks without me. Your face. I dedicate this work to Sarah Bough, without whom I would never have started this PhD, wish you were here; and to my dad, who would have been a brilliant biologist. 3 Contents 1 Abbreviations Used .................................................................................................... 9 2 Abstract .................................................................................................................... 12 3 General Introduction ................................................................................................ 13 3.1 Acari .................................................................................................................. 13 3.2 Mites ................................................................................................................. 14 3.2.1 Mite Anatomy and Lifestyle ........................................................................... 14 3.2.2 Mite Damage and Mite-Borne Disease .......................................................... 14 3.3 Ticks ................................................................................................................... 20 3.3.1 Tick Anatomy and Lifestyle ............................................................................. 20 3.3.2 Tick Damage and Tick-Borne Disease ............................................................. 21 3.4 Acarine Control ................................................................................................. 25 3.4.1 Biological Acarine Control .............................................................................. 26 3.4.2 Vaccination ..................................................................................................... 28 3.4.3 RNAi Gene Silencing ....................................................................................... 31 3.4.4 Plant-Derived Chemical Acaricides ................................................................. 32 3.4.5 Synthetic Chemical Acaricides ........................................................................ 33 3.5 Pyrethroid Pesticides and the Arthropod VGSC ............................................... 35 3.5.1 Pyrethroid Discovery and Development ........................................................ 35 3.5.2 Expression of VGSCs ....................................................................................... 36 3.5.3 VGSC Structure and Function ......................................................................... 37 3.5.4 Pyrethroid Action at the Arthropod VGSC ...................................................... 41 3.5.5 The VGSC and Pyrethroid Resistance in Arthropods ...................................... 44 3.5.6 Pyrethroids as Acaricides ................................................................................ 45 3.6 Electrophysiological Methods to Study VGSC Activity ..................................... 47 3.6.1 Two Electrode Volt Clamp (TEVC) Electrophysiology ..................................... 47 3.6.2 Studying Pyrethroids and VGSCs Using TEVC Electrophysiology ................... 48 3.7 Aims and Objectives .......................................................................................... 49 4 General Experimental Methods ............................................................................... 50 4.1 Source Organisms ............................................................................................. 50 4.2 Agarose Gel Electrophoresis ............................................................................. 51 4 4.3 Extraction of Total RNA from Ticks and Mites .................................................. 51 4.4 Reverse Transcription of RNA ........................................................................... 53 4.5 Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Protocols .................................................... 54 4.6 Primers .............................................................................................................. 54 4.7 Media and Antibiotics ....................................................................................... 54 4.8 Gel Purification of PCR Products ....................................................................... 55 4.9 Cloning of DNA for Sequence Analysis ............................................................. 56 4.10 Transformation of Plasmids into E. coli ............................................................ 57 4.11 Colony PCR ........................................................................................................ 58 4.12 Nucleic Acid Precipitation ................................................................................. 60 4.13 Extraction of Plasmid DNA from E. coli ............................................................. 60 4.14 Sequencing and Sequence Analysis .................................................................. 61 4.15 Site-Directed Mutagenesis of Cloned VGSC Sequences ................................... 61 4.16 Data Analysis ..................................................................................................... 63 5 Amplification and Sequencing of Acarine VGSCs ..................................................... 64 5.1 Chapter Introduction and Aims ........................................................................ 64 5.2 Chapter Specific Methods ................................................................................. 65 5.2.1 Primers for VGSC Amplification and Sequencing ........................................... 65 5.2.2 PCR Protocols .................................................................................................. 69 5.2.3 Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends (RACE) ...................................................... 72 5.2.4 Transcriptomics .............................................................................................. 75 5.3 Results ............................................................................................................... 76 5.3.1 Comparing the Pyrethroid Binding Site of Insect and Acarine VGSCs ............ 76 5.3.2 Pyrethroid Resistance in R. microplus and R. sanguineus .............................. 81 5.4 Discussion.......................................................................................................... 86 6 Progress in Obtaining a Chimeric Arthropod VGSC ................................................. 90 6.1 Chapter Introduction and Aims ........................................................................ 90 6.2 Chapter Specific Methods ................................................................................. 90 6.2.1 para 13-5 Mutagenesis and Primer Design .................................................... 90 6.2.2 Amplification of the Domain-Spanning Region of the R. microplus VGSC ..... 94 6.2.3 Ligation Reactions to Create a Chimeric
Recommended publications
  • Pinpointing the Origin of Mitochondria Zhang Wang Hanchuan, Hubei
    Pinpointing the origin of mitochondria Zhang Wang Hanchuan, Hubei, China B.S., Wuhan University, 2009 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Biology University of Virginia August, 2014 ii Abstract The explosive growth of genomic data presents both opportunities and challenges for the study of evolutionary biology, ecology and diversity. Genome-scale phylogenetic analysis (known as phylogenomics) has demonstrated its power in resolving the evolutionary tree of life and deciphering various fascinating questions regarding the origin and evolution of earth’s contemporary organisms. One of the most fundamental events in the earth’s history of life regards the origin of mitochondria. Overwhelming evidence supports the endosymbiotic theory that mitochondria originated once from a free-living α-proteobacterium that was engulfed by its host probably 2 billion years ago. However, its exact position in the tree of life remains highly debated. In particular, systematic errors including sparse taxonomic sampling, high evolutionary rate and sequence composition bias have long plagued the mitochondrial phylogenetics. This dissertation employs an integrated phylogenomic approach toward pinpointing the origin of mitochondria. By strategically sequencing 18 phylogenetically novel α-proteobacterial genomes, using a set of “well-behaved” phylogenetic markers with lower evolutionary rates and less composition bias, and applying more realistic phylogenetic models that better account for the systematic errors, the presented phylogenomic study for the first time placed the mitochondria unequivocally within the Rickettsiales order of α- proteobacteria, as a sister clade to the Rickettsiaceae and Anaplasmataceae families, all subtended by the Holosporaceae family.
    [Show full text]
  • Sgienge Bulletin
    THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SGIENGE BULLETIN Vol. XXXVII, Px. II] June 29, 1956 [No. 19 of The Chigger Mites Kansas (Acarina, Trombiculidae ) BY Richard B. Loomis Abstract: Studies of the chigger mites in Kansas revealed 47 forms, con- sisting of 46 species in the following genera: Leeuwcnhoekia ( 1 ), Acomatacarus (3), Whartoraa (1), Hannemania (3), Trombicula (21), Speleocola (1), Euschbngastia (10), Pseudoschongastia (2), Cheladonta (1), Neoschongastia (2), and Walchia (1). Data were gathered in the period from 1947 to 1954. More than 14,000 mounted larvae were critically examined. All but one of the 47 forms were obtained from a total of 6,534 vertebrates of 194 species. Larvae of eight species of chiggers also were recovered from black plastic sampler plates placed on the substrate. Free-living nymphs and adults of all species seem to be active in warm weather. The time of oviposition differs in the different kinds, but there is little variation within a species. The exact time of emergence, abundance and disappearance of the larvae depends on the temperature of the environment. The species can be arranged according to their larval activity in two seasonal groups: the summer group (26 species) and the winter group (20 species). The seasonal overlap between these groups is slight. Rainfall and moisture content of the substrate affect the abundance of the larvae, but not the time of their emergence or disappearance. The summer species often have two genera- tions of larvae annually, but in the winter species no more than one generation is known. The larvae, normally parasitic on vertebrates, exhibit little host specificity.
    [Show full text]
  • Résurrection Du Passé À L'aide De Modèles Hétérogènes D'évolution Des Séquences Protéiques
    Résurrection du passé à l’aide de modèles hétérogènes d’évolution des séquences protéiques Mathieu Groussin To cite this version: Mathieu Groussin. Résurrection du passé à l’aide de modèles hétérogènes d’évolution des séquences protéiques. Biologie moléculaire. Université Claude Bernard - Lyon I, 2013. Français. NNT : 2013LYO10201. tel-01160535 HAL Id: tel-01160535 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01160535 Submitted on 5 Jun 2015 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. No 201-2013 Année 2013 These` de l’universitedelyon´ Présentée devant L’UNIVERSITÉ CLAUDE BERNARD LYON 1 pour l’obtention du Diplomeˆ de doctorat (arrêté du 7 août 2006) soutenue publiquement le 8 novembre 2013 par Mathieu Groussin Résurrection du passé à l’aide de modèles hétérogènes d’évolution des séquences protéiques. Directeur de thèse : Manolo Gouy Jury : Céline Brochier-Armanet Examinateur - Président Laurent Duret Examinateur Nicolas Galtier Rapporteur Olivier Gascuel Rapporteur Manolo Gouy Directeur de thèse Dominique Madern Examinateur Hervé Philippe Examinateur 2 UNIVERSITE CLAUDE BERNARD - LYON 1 Président de l’Université M. François-Noël GILLY Vice-président du Conseil d’Administration M. le Professeur Hamda BEN HADID Vice-président du Conseil des Etudes et de la Vie Universitaire M.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/0187776 A1 HOLYOKE, JR
    US 20140187776A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/0187776 A1 HOLYOKE, JR. et al. (43) Pub. Date: Jul. 3, 2014 (54) MIXTURES OF MESOIONIC PESTICIDES (71) Applicant: E I DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, Wilmington, DE (US) (72) Inventors: CALEB WILLIAM HOLYOKE, JR., NEWARK, DE (US); WENMING ZHANG, NEWARK, DE (US); MY-HANH THITONG, BEAR, DE (US): THOMAS FRANCIS PAHUTSKI, JR., ELKTON, MD (US) (73) Assignee: E I DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND wherein COMPANY, Wilmington, DE (US) R" is phenyl optionally substituted with up to 5 substituents independently selected from R, or pyridinyl optionally (21) Appl. No.: 14/184,778 substituted with up to 4 substituents independently selected from R: (22) Filed: Feb. 20, 2014 R’ is C-C haloalkyl; or thiazolyl pyridinyl or pyrimidi Related U.S. Application Data nyl, each optionally substituted with up to 2 substituents independently selected from the group consisting of (63) Continuation of application No. 13/386,160, filed on halogen and C-C alkyl; Jan. 20, 2012, now Pat. No. 8,697,707, filed as appli each R is independently halogen, cyano, C-C alkyl, cation No. PCT/US2010/044285 on Aug. 3, 2010. C-Chaloalkyl, C-C alkoxy, C-Chaloalkoxy, C(R) (60) Provisional application No. 61/231,483, filed on Aug. —NOR or Q; 5, 2009. each R is independently C-C alkyl: Publication Classification Z is CH=CH or S; and (51) Int. Cl. each Q is independently phenyl or pyridinyl, each option AOIN 43/90 (2006.01) ally substituted with up to 3 substituents independently (52) U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Reverse TCA Cycle 2-Oxoacid:Ferredoxin Oxidoreductase That Makes C-C Bonds from CO2
    A Reverse TCA Cycle 2-Oxoacid:Ferredoxin Oxidoreductase that Makes C-C Bonds from CO2 The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Chen, Percival Yang-Ting et al. “A Reverse TCA Cycle 2- Oxoacid:Ferredoxin Oxidoreductase that Makes C-C Bonds from CO2.” Joule 3 (2018): 595-611 © 2018 The Author(s) As Published 10.1016/J.JOULE.2018.12.006 Publisher Elsevier BV Version Author's final manuscript Citable link https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/125243 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author Joule. Author Manuscript Author manuscript; Manuscript Author available in PMC 2020 February 20. Published in final edited form as: Joule. 2019 February 20; 3(2): 595–611. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2018.12.006. A reverse TCA cycle 2-oxoacid:ferredoxin oxidoreductase that makes C-C bonds from CO2 Percival Yang-Ting Chen1,†, Bin Li2,†, Catherine L. Drennan1,3,4,5,*, and Sean J. Elliott2,6,* 1Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 2Department of Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215 3Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 4Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 5Bio-inspired Solar Energy Program, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, Canada 6Lead contact. Summary 2-oxoglutarate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase (OGOR) is a thiamine pyrophosphate (TPP) and [4Fe-4S] cluster-dependent enzyme from the reductive tricarboxylic acid (rTCA) cycle that fixes CO2 to succinyl-CoA, forming 2-oxoglutarate and CoA.
    [Show full text]
  • Table S5. the Information of the Bacteria Annotated in the Soil Community at Species Level
    Table S5. The information of the bacteria annotated in the soil community at species level No. Phylum Class Order Family Genus Species The number of contigs Abundance(%) 1 Firmicutes Bacilli Bacillales Bacillaceae Bacillus Bacillus cereus 1749 5.145782459 2 Bacteroidetes Cytophagia Cytophagales Hymenobacteraceae Hymenobacter Hymenobacter sedentarius 1538 4.52499338 3 Gemmatimonadetes Gemmatimonadetes Gemmatimonadales Gemmatimonadaceae Gemmatirosa Gemmatirosa kalamazoonesis 1020 3.000970902 4 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas indica 797 2.344876284 5 Firmicutes Bacilli Lactobacillales Streptococcaceae Lactococcus Lactococcus piscium 542 1.594633558 6 Actinobacteria Thermoleophilia Solirubrobacterales Conexibacteraceae Conexibacter Conexibacter woesei 471 1.385742446 7 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas taxi 430 1.265115184 8 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas wittichii 388 1.141545794 9 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas sp. FARSPH 298 0.876754244 10 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sorangium cellulosum 260 0.764953367 11 Proteobacteria Deltaproteobacteria Myxococcales Polyangiaceae Sorangium Sphingomonas sp. Cra20 260 0.764953367 12 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas panacis 252 0.741416341
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of the Microbial Communities Associated with the Octocorals Erythropodium
    Investigation of the Microbial Communities Associated with the Octocorals Erythropodium caribaeorum and Antillogorgia elisabethae, and Identification of Secondary Metabolites Produced by Octocoral Associated Cultivated Bacteria. By Erin Patricia Barbara McCauley A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for a Degree of • Doctor of Philosophy Department of Biomedical Sciences Faculty of Veterinary Medicine University of Prince Edward Island Charlottetown, P.E.I. April 2017 © 2017, McCauley THESIS/DISSERTATION NON-EXCLUSIVE LICENSE Family Name: McCauley . Given Name, Middle Name (if applicable): Erin Patricia Barbara Full Name of University: University of Prince Edward Island . Faculty, Department, School: Department of Biomedical Sciences, Atlantic Veterinary College Degree for which Date Degree Awarded: , thesis/dissertation was presented: April 3rd, 2017 Doctor of Philosophy Thesis/dissertation Title: Investigation of the Microbial Communities Associated with the Octocorals Erythropodium caribaeorum and Antillogorgia elisabethae, and Identification of Secondary Metabolites Produced by Octocoral Associated Cultivated Bacteria. *Date of Birth. May 4th, 1983 In consideration of my University making my thesis/dissertation available to interested persons, I, :Erin Patricia McCauley hereby grant a non-exclusive, for the full term of copyright protection, license to my University, The University of Prince Edward Island: to archive, preserve, produce, reproduce, publish, communicate, convert into a,riv format, and to make available in print or online by telecommunication to the public for non-commercial purposes; to sub-license to Library and Archives Canada any of the acts mentioned in paragraph (a). I undertake to submit my thesis/dissertation, through my University, to Library and Archives Canada. Any abstract submitted with the .
    [Show full text]
  • Mitochondria Branch Within Alphaproteobacteria 3 4 Lu Fan1,2¶, Dingfeng Wu3¶, Vadim Goremykin4¶, Jing Xiao3, Yanbing Xu3, Sriram Garg6, Chuanlun 5 Zhang2,5, William F
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/715870; this version posted July 26, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 2 Mitochondria branch within Alphaproteobacteria 3 4 Lu Fan1,2¶, Dingfeng Wu3¶, Vadim Goremykin4¶, Jing Xiao3, Yanbing Xu3, Sriram Garg6, Chuanlun 5 Zhang2,5, William F. Martin6*, Ruixin Zhu3,2* 6 1 Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Southern University of Science and Technology 7 (SUSTech), Shenzhen 518055, China 8 2 Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Marine Archaea Geo-Omics, Department of Ocean Science and Engineering, 9 Southern University of Science and Technology (SUSTech), Shenzhen 518055, China 10 3 Putuo people's Hospital, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, 11 P.R.China. 12 4 Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione E. Mach, 38010 San Michele all’Adige (TN), Italy 13 5 Laboratory for Marine Geology, Qingdao Pilot National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, 14 Qingdao, 266061, China 15 6 Institute of Molecular Evolution, Heinrich-Heine-University, Universitätsstr. 1, 40225 Düsseldorf, 16 Germany 17 18 ¶ These authors contribute equally to this work. 19 * Corresponding authors: 20 William F. Martin ([email protected]) 21 Ruixin Zhu ([email protected]) 22 23 It is well accepted that mitochondria originated from an alphaproteobacterial-like ancestor. However, 24 the phylogenetic relationship of the mitochondrial endosymbiont to extant alphaproteobacteria 25 remains a subject of discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • Magneto-Aerotactic Bacteria Deliver Drug-Containing Nanoliposomes to Tumour Hypoxic Regions
    HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author Nat Nanotechnol Manuscript Author . Author Manuscript Author manuscript; available in PMC 2018 August 16. Published in final edited form as: Nat Nanotechnol. 2016 November ; 11(11): 941–947. doi:10.1038/nnano.2016.137. Magneto-aerotactic bacteria deliver drug-containing nanoliposomes to tumour hypoxic regions Ouajdi Felfoul1,*, Mahmood Mohammadi1,*, Samira Taherkhani1,7,*, Dominic de Lanauze1, Yong Zhong Xu6, Dumitru Loghin1, Sherief Essa4,7, Sylwia Jancik6, Daniel Houle6, Michel Lafleur4, Louis Gaboury5, Maryam Tabrizian7,8, Neila Kaou1, Michael Atkin1, Té Vuong2, Gerald Batist2, Nicole Beauchemin3, Danuta Radzioch6,*, and Sylvain Martel1,& 1NanoRobotics Laboratory, Dept. of Computer and Software Eng., Inst. of Biomedical Eng., Polytechnique Montréal, Montréal, Canada 2Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Dept. of Oncology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada 3Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Research Centre, Dept. of Biochemistry, Medicine and Oncology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada 4Dept. of Chemistry, University of Montréal (UdM), Montréal, Canada 5Institute for Research in Immunology and Cancer (IRIC), Dept. of Pathology and Cell Biology, University of Montréal, Montréal, Canada 6McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Canada 7Dept. of Biomedical Eng., McGill University, Montréal, Canada 8Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montréal, Canada Abstract Oxygen depleted hypoxic regions in the tumour are generally resistant to therapies1. Although nanocarriers have been used to deliver drugs, the targeting ratios have been very low. Here, we Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#termsReprints and permissions information is available online at www.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions/.
    [Show full text]
  • Lists of Names of Prokaryotic Candidatus Taxa
    NOTIFICATION LIST: CANDIDATUS LIST NO. 1 Oren et al., Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. DOI 10.1099/ijsem.0.003789 Lists of names of prokaryotic Candidatus taxa Aharon Oren1,*, George M. Garrity2,3, Charles T. Parker3, Maria Chuvochina4 and Martha E. Trujillo5 Abstract We here present annotated lists of names of Candidatus taxa of prokaryotes with ranks between subspecies and class, pro- posed between the mid- 1990s, when the provisional status of Candidatus taxa was first established, and the end of 2018. Where necessary, corrected names are proposed that comply with the current provisions of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes and its Orthography appendix. These lists, as well as updated lists of newly published names of Candidatus taxa with additions and corrections to the current lists to be published periodically in the International Journal of Systematic and Evo- lutionary Microbiology, may serve as the basis for the valid publication of the Candidatus names if and when the current propos- als to expand the type material for naming of prokaryotes to also include gene sequences of yet-uncultivated taxa is accepted by the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes. Introduction of the category called Candidatus was first pro- morphology, basis of assignment as Candidatus, habitat, posed by Murray and Schleifer in 1994 [1]. The provisional metabolism and more. However, no such lists have yet been status Candidatus was intended for putative taxa of any rank published in the journal. that could not be described in sufficient details to warrant Currently, the nomenclature of Candidatus taxa is not covered establishment of a novel taxon, usually because of the absence by the rules of the Prokaryotic Code.
    [Show full text]
  • An Expanded Ribosomal Phylogeny of Cyanobacteria Supports a Deep Placement of Plastids
    An Expanded Ribosomal Phylogeny of Cyanobacteria Supports a Deep Placement of Plastids The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Moore, Kelsey R. et al. "An Expanded Ribosomal Phylogeny of Cyanobacteria Supports a Deep Placement of Plastids." Frontiers in Microbiology 10 (July 2019): 1612 © 2019 Moore et al. As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01612 Publisher Frontiers Media SA Version Final published version Citable link https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/128981 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license Detailed Terms https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ fmicb-10-01612 July 12, 2019 Time: 13:58 # 1 HYPOTHESIS AND THEORY published: 12 July 2019 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01612 An Expanded Ribosomal Phylogeny of Cyanobacteria Supports a Deep Placement of Plastids Kelsey R. Moore1*, Cara Magnabosco2, Lily Momper1, David A. Gold3, Tanja Bosak1 and Gregory P. Fournier1 1 Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States, 2 Center for Computational Biology, Flatiron Institute, Simons Foundation, New York, NY, United States, 3 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States The phylum Cyanobacteria includes free-living bacteria and plastids, the descendants of cyanobacteria that were engulfed by the ancestral lineage of the major photosynthetic eukaryotic group Archaeplastida. Endosymbiotic events that followed this primary endosymbiosis spread plastids across diverse eukaryotic groups. The remnants of the Edited by: ancestral cyanobacterial genome present in all modern plastids, enable the placement Rekha Seshadri, of plastids within Cyanobacteria using sequence-based phylogenetic analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • Flagella and Swimming Behavior of Marine Magnetotactic Bacteria
    biomolecules Review Flagella and Swimming Behavior of Marine Magnetotactic Bacteria Wei-Jia Zhang 1,2 and Long-Fei Wu 2,3,* 1 Laboratory of Deep-Sea Microbial Cell Biology, Institute of Deep-sea Science and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Sanya 572000, China; [email protected] 2 International Associated Laboratory of Evolution and Development of Magnetotactic Multicellular Organisms, F-13402 CNRS-Marseille, France/CAS-Sanya 572000, China 3 Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, LCB, IMM, IM2B, CENTURI, F-13402 Marseille, France * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +33-4-9116-4157 Received: 25 February 2020; Accepted: 15 March 2020; Published: 16 March 2020 Abstract: Marine environments are generally characterized by low bulk concentrations of nutrients that are susceptible to steady or intermittent motion driven by currents and local turbulence. Marine bacteria have therefore developed strategies, such as very fast-swimming and the exploitation of multiple directional sensing–response systems in order to efficiently migrate towards favorable places in nutrient gradients. The magnetotactic bacteria (MTB) even utilize Earth’s magnetic field to facilitate downward swimming into the oxic–anoxic interface, which is the most favorable place for their persistence and proliferation, in chemically stratified sediments or water columns. To ensure the desired flagella-propelled motility, marine MTBs have evolved an exquisite flagellar apparatus, and an extremely high number (tens of thousands) of flagella can be found on a single entity, displaying a complex polar, axial, bounce, and photosensitive magnetotactic behavior. In this review, we describe gene clusters, the flagellar apparatus architecture, and the swimming behavior of marine unicellular and multicellular magnetotactic bacteria.
    [Show full text]