DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 4 – Service Expansion Descriptions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 4 – Service Expansion Descriptions CHAPTER 4: Service Expansion Descriptions Report Prepared by: Contents 4 SERVICE EXPANSION PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS ........................................... 4-1 4.1 Transit Service Plan ........................................................................................ 4-1 4.1.1 Prioritization and Ridership Forecasting ................................................... 4-4 4.1.2 Columbia Pike Corridor Service Expansion Recommendations ............... 4-5 4.1.3 Crystal City / Pentagon City Corridor Service Expansion ....................... 4-21 4.1.4 ART Service Expansion .......................................................................... 4-23 4.1.5 Metrobus Service Expansion .................................................................. 4-70 4.1.6 Benefits and Impacts of Recommendations ........................................... 4-96 4.2 Transit Facility Recommendations .............................................................. 4-111 Appendix A: Phase III Outreach Report ................................................................ 4-112 Figures Figure 1 | Fully Implemented ART System ................................................................... 4-2 Figure 2 | Fully Implemented Metrobus (Arlington County) System ............................. 4-3 Figure 3 | Columbia Pike Service Network ................................................................... 4-6 Figure 4 | Route 45 Recommended Alignment ............................................................ 4-9 Figure 5 | Route 74 Recommended Alignment .......................................................... 4-11 Figure 6 | Route 16M Recommended Alignment........................................................ 4-15 Figure 7 | Route 16Z Recommended Alignment ........................................................ 4-20 Figure 8 | Metroway Recommended Alignment.......................................................... 4-22 Figure 9 | Route 51 Recommended Alignment (Phase 1) .......................................... 4-28 Figure 10 | Route 51 Recommended Alignment (Phase 2) ........................................ 4-29 Figure 11 | Route 62 Recommended Alignment......................................................... 4-34 Figure 12 | Route 77 Recommended Alignment......................................................... 4-37 Figure 13 | Route 84 Recommended Alignment......................................................... 4-39 Figure 14 | Route 87 Recommended Alignment......................................................... 4-41 Figure 15 | Route 92 Recommended Alignment......................................................... 4-43 Figure 16 | Route 44 Recommended Alignment......................................................... 4-46 Figure 17 | Route 54 Recommended Alignment......................................................... 4-48 Figure 18 | Route 58 Recommended Alignment (Phase 1) ........................................ 4-51 Figure 19 | Route 58 Recommended Alignment (Phase 2) ........................................ 4-52 Figure 20 | Route 59 Recommended Alignment (Phase 1) ........................................ 4-55 Figure 21 | Route 59 Recommended Alignment (Phase 2) ........................................ 4-56 Figure 22 | Route 63 Recommended Alignment......................................................... 4-58 Figure 23 | Route 88 Recommended Alignment......................................................... 4-60 Figure 24 | Route 93 Recommended Alignment......................................................... 4-63 Figure 25 | Flex Zones 1 and 2 Recommended Service Area .................................... 4-65 Figure 26 | Flex Zone 3 Recommended Service Area ................................................ 4-67 Figure 27 | Flex Zone 4 Recommended Service Area ................................................ 4-69 Figure 28 | Route 1B Recommended Alignment ........................................................ 4-73 Figure 29 | Route 10A Recommended Alignment ...................................................... 4-83 Figure 30 | Route 10E Recommended Alignment ...................................................... 4-84 Figure 31 | Route 10B Recommended Alignment ...................................................... 4-86 Figure 32 | Route 15L Recommended Alignment....................................................... 4-89 Figure 33 | Route 1Y Recommended Alignment ........................................................ 4-95 Figure 34 | Ballston Route Connections ..................................................................... 4-99 Figure 35 | Clarendon-Courthouse Route Connections ............................................ 4-100 Figure 36 | Pentagon City-Crystal City Route Connections ...................................... 4-101 Figure 37 | East Falls Church Route Connections .................................................... 4-102 Figure 38 | Rosslyn Route Connections ................................................................... 4-103 Figure 39 | Shirlington Route Connections ............................................................... 4-104 Figure 40 | Availability of Transit Service to Low-Income Populations ..................... 4-106 Figure 41 | Availability of Transit Service to Minority Populations ............................ 4-107 Figure 42 | Proposed Premium, Primary and Secondary Transit Networks ............. 4-110 Tables Table 1 | Ridership Forecasting Methodology by Improvement Type ........................... 4-4 Table 2 | Route 41 Recommended Level of Service .................................................... 4-7 Table 3 | Route 45 Recommended Level of Service .................................................... 4-8 Table 4 | Route 74 Recommended Level of Service .................................................. 4-10 Table 5 | Route 16A Recommended Level of Service ................................................ 4-13 Table 6 | Route 16M Recommended Level of Service ............................................... 4-14 Table 7 | Route 16X Recommended Level of Service ................................................ 4-17 Table 8 | Route 16Z Recommended Level of Service ................................................ 4-19 Table 9 | Metroway Recommended Level of Service ................................................. 4-21 Table 10 | Route 42 Recommended Level of Service ................................................ 4-25 Table 11 | Route 43 Recommended Level of Service ................................................ 4-26 Table 12 | Route 51 Recommended Level of Service ................................................ 4-27 Table 13 | Route 52 Recommended Level of Service ................................................ 4-30 Table 14 | Route 53 Recommended Level of Service ................................................ 4-31 Table 15 | Route 55 Recommended Level of Service ................................................ 4-32 Table 16 | Route 75 Recommended Level of Service ................................................ 4-35 Table 17 | Route 77 Recommended Level of Service ................................................ 4-36 Table 18 | Route 84 Recommended Level of Service ................................................ 4-38 Table 19 | Route 87 Recommended Level of Service ................................................ 4-40 Table 20 | Route 92 Recommended Level of Service ................................................ 4-42 Table 21 | Route 31 Recommended Level of Service ................................................ 4-44 Table 22 | Route 44 Recommended Level of Service ................................................ 4-45 Table 23 | Route 54 Recommended Level of Service ................................................ 4-47 Table 24 | Route 58 Recommended Level of Service ................................................ 4-50 Table 25 | Route 59 Recommended Level of Service ................................................ 4-54 Table 26 | Route 63 Recommended Level of Service ................................................ 4-57 Table 27 | Route 88 Recommended Level of Service ................................................ 4-59 Table 28 | Route 93 Recommended Level of Service ................................................ 4-62 Table 29 | Flex Zones 1 and 2 Recommended Level of Service ................................ 4-64 Table 30 | Flex Zone 3 Recommended Level of Service ............................................ 4-66 Table 31 | Flex Zones 4 Recommended Level of Service .......................................... 4-68 Table 32 | Route 1A Recommended Level of Service ................................................ 4-71 Table 33 | Route 1B Recommended Level of Service ................................................ 4-72 Table 34 | Route 2A Recommended Level of Service ................................................ 4-74 Table 35 | Route 3Y Recommended Level of Service ................................................ 4-75 Table 36 | Route 4B Recommended Level of Service ................................................ 4-76 Table 37 | Route 7A Recommended Level of Service ................................................ 4-78 Table 38 | Route 7Y Recommended Level of Service ................................................ 4-79 Table 39 | Route 7C Recommended Level of Service ................................................ 4-80 Table 40 | Route 10A Recommended Level of Service .............................................. 4-81 Table 41 | Route 10E Recommended Level
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 38B Map and Timetable
    How to use this timetable Effective 12-18-16 ➤ Use the map to find the stops closest to where you will get on and off the bus. ➤ Select the schedule (Weekday, Saturday, Sunday) for when you will travel. Along the top of the schedule, Ballston-Farragut Square Line find the stop at or nearest the point where you will get on the bus. Follow that column down to the time you want to leave. ➤ Use the same method to find the times the bus is scheduled to arrive at the stop where you will get off the bus. Serves these locations- ➤ If the bus stop is not listed, use the Brinda servicio a estas ubicaciones time shown for the bus stop before it as the time to wait at the stop. l Ballston-MU station ➤ The end-of-the-line or last stop is listed l Clarendon station in ALL CAPS on the schedule. l Court House station Rosslyn station Cómo Usar este Horario l ➤ Use este mapa para localizar las l Georgetown paradas más cercanas a donde se l Farragut North station subirá y bajará del autobús. l Farragut West station ➤ Seleccione el horario (Entre semana, sábado, domingo) de cuando viajará. A lo largo de la parte superior del horario, localice la parada o el punto más cercano a la parada en la que se subirá al autobús. Siga esa columna hacia abajo hasta la hora en la que desee salir. ➤ Utilice el mismo método para localizar las horas en que el autobús está programado para llegar a la parada en donde desea bajarse del autobús.
    [Show full text]
  • Ballston-Farragut Square Line fi Nd the Stop at Or Nearest the Point Where You Will Get on the Bus
    How to use this timetable English-Español ➤ Use the map to fi nd the stops closest to where you will get on and off the bus. ➤ Select the schedule (Weekday, Saturday, Sunday) for when you will travel. Along the top of the schedule, Ballston-Farragut Square Line fi nd the stop at or nearest the point where you will get on the bus. Follow that column down to the time you want to leave. ➤ Use the same method to fi nd the times the bus is scheduled to arrive at the stop where you will get off the bus. ➤ If the bus stop is not listed, use the time shown for the bus stop before it as the time to wait at the stop. ➤ The end-of-the-line or last stop is listed Serves these locations- in ALL CAPS on the schedule. Brinda servicio a estas ubicaciones Cómo Usar este Horario Ballston-MU station Clarendon station ➤ Use este mapa para localizar las Court House station paradas más cercanas a donde se Rosslyn station subirá y bajará del autobús. Georgetown ➤ Seleccione el horario (Entre semana, Farragut North station sábado, domingo) de cuando viajará. Farragut West station A lo largo de la parte superior del horario, localice la parada o el punto más cercano a la parada en la que se subirá al autobús. Siga esa columna hacia abajo hasta la hora en la que desee salir. ➤ Utilice el mismo método para localizar las horas en que el autobús está programado para llegar a la parada en donde desea bajarse del autobús.
    [Show full text]
  • Documents, and Held Meetings with Stakeholders to Solicit Feedback
    Tasks 8-9: Data Analysis and Case Studies Summary Memo March 30, 2016 Prepared by: Michael Baker International and State Smart Transportation Initiative NOVA TDM Study Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 3 Scanning NOVA for Issues and Opportunities .......................................................................... 3 Common pairs ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Circuity .................................................................................................................................................... 4 Short trips ................................................................................................................................................ 4 Selected links ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Case Studies ................................................................................................................................. 16 1. Tysons Corner ................................................................................................................................... 19 2. George Mason University................................................................................................................. 24 3. Fort Belvoir ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TCRP Report 102 – Transit-Oriented
    TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH TCRP PROGRAM REPORT 102 Transit-Oriented Sponsored by Development in the the Federal United States: Transit Administration Experiences, Challenges, and Prospects TCRP OVERSIGHT AND PROJECT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 2004 (Membership as of January 2004) SELECTION COMMITTEE (as of January 2004) OFFICERS CHAIR Chair: Michael S. Townes, President and CEO, Hampton Roads Transit, Hampton, VA J. BARRY BARKER Vice Chair: Joseph H. Boardman, Commissioner, New York State DOT Transit Authority of River City Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board MEMBERS MEMBERS KAREN ANTION MICHAEL W. BEHRENS, Executive Director, Texas DOT Karen Antion Consulting SARAH C. CAMPBELL, President, TransManagement, Inc., Washington, DC GORDON AOYAGI Montgomery County Government E. DEAN CARLSON, Director, Carlson Associates, Topeka, KS RONALD L. BARNES JOHN L. CRAIG, Director, Nebraska Department of Roads Central Ohio Transit Authority DOUGLAS G. DUNCAN, President and CEO, FedEx Freight, Memphis, TN LINDA J. BOHLINGER GENEVIEVE GIULIANO, Director, Metrans Transportation Center and Professor, School of Policy, HNTB Corp. Planning, and Development, USC, Los Angeles ANDREW BONDS, JR. BERNARD S. GROSECLOSE, JR., President and CEO, South Carolina State Ports Authority Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. SUSAN HANSON, Landry University Prof. of Geography, Graduate School of Geography, Clark University JENNIFER L. DORN JAMES R. HERTWIG, President, Landstar Logistics, Inc., Jacksonville, FL FTA HENRY L. HUNGERBEELER, Director, Missouri DOT NATHANIEL P. FORD, SR. ADIB K. KANAFANI, Cahill Professor of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley Metropolitan Atlanta RTA RONALD F. KIRBY, Director of Transportation Planning, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments CONSTANCE GARBER HERBERT S. LEVINSON, Principal, Herbert S. Levinson Transportation Consultant, New Haven, CT York County Community Action Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Parking Study City of Alexandria Potornac Village
    Comparative Parking Study City of Alexandria for Potornac Village - Potornac Yards November 19,2009 Prepared for: McCaffery Interests Merging Innovation and ~xcellence@ STUDY RESULTS .~~~mma~m~~.a~~.~m.~~~~m~mm~m~~~~..~~~~~~~~uauu~~~~~~~~~~~~~~mm~~mm~~~~mm~m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1 A. Summary of findings Parklig Study Prepared for Potomac Wllage Comparison of TO.D. Sites in Region ...; ..................... !. ......................., ........ -3 I. Corporate Offlcg B. Potomac Irllage - Potvmac Yam's Parking Comparison ...... .;. ............................5 .... Baltimore, MD C Mowe Theater Parking Demand Sun/ey............................................. ;. ............6 . Suite H ! 9900 Fanklln Square Drlve ; ' Baltimore, Maryland 21 238 410.931 .a600 fax: 410.931.6601 lr'' 1.800.583.841 1 i] 1.' , Other Office Locations Delrnanra Reglon 2 JVirginia i, r Data Sheets - Hour by Hour Data Sheets - Project Descriptions Bock by lock' Share Parking Spreadsheets Prepared by: Wes Guckert, PTP .* The Traffic Group, Inc. was requested by the City of Alexandria, .as. pait of the approval process for the Potomac Village project in, CrrYCrrYOF ALEXANDRIA Potomac Yards,. to conduct parking lot For POTOMAC VILLAGE -POTOMAC occupancy studies far various sites in both YARDS Alexdndria and Arlington. Prepared for The Appenk to this report. contains the McCaffery Iriterests individual data sheets and back-up information for each of the projects studied. Exhibit A is a summary of the findings that details the project name, address, type,.of. development, size of the development, and the number of parking spaces provided. There is a column that provides peak demand, peak percent occupancy, peak parking ratio, and the distance from the Metro Station for the development. Additionally, we contacted the City of Alexandria to obtain information on the Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures that are required for each of the developments studied.
    [Show full text]
  • FTA WMATA Safety Oversight Inspection Reports January 2018
    FOIA Exemption: All (b)(6) Inspection Form Form FTA-IR-1 United States Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration Agency/Department Information YYYY MM DD Inspection Date Report Number 20180102-WMATA-WP-1 2018 01 02 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Rail Agency Rail Agency Name TRPM Sub- Department Authority Department Name Email Office Phone Mobile Phone Rail Agency Department Contact Information Inspection Location West Falls Church Yard (K99) Inspection Summary Inspection Activity # 1 2 3 4 5 6 Activity Code TP-JSB-OBS TP-WI-OBS Inspection Units 1 1 Inspection Subunits 1 1 Defects (Number) 0 29 Recommended Finding No No Remedial Action Required1 No Yes Recommended Reinspection No Yes Activity Summaries Inspection Activity # 1 Inspection Subject Job Safety Briefing Activity Code TP JSB OBS Job Briefing Accompanied Out Brief 1000- Outside Employee TRPM 1099 Yes Yes Time No Inspector? Conducted 1200 Shift Name/Title Related Reports N/A Related CAPS / Findings N/A Ref Rule or SOP Standard Other / Title Checklist Reference Related Rules, SOPs, RWPM Standards, or Other MSRPH Main RTA FTA Yard Station OCC At-grade Tunnel Elevated N/A Track Facility Office Inspection Location Track Type X X Track Chain Marker From To Line(s) N/A N/A Number and/or Station(s) West Falls Church Yard (K99) West Falls Church Yard (K99) Head Car Number Number of Cars Vehicles Equipment N/A N/A N/A 1 The rail transit agency must provide FTA with the necessary evidence (e.g. maintenance work order system records, photos, documentation, records, data, or other evidence) to close out the Remedial Action.
    [Show full text]
  • C:Ut S.BII Ll 1 Ti I Sector Plan Adopted May 1984
    c:ut S.BII ll 1 ti I Sector Plan Adopted May 1984 Arlington County Board Members Ellen M. Bozman, Chairman John G. Milliken, Vice Chairman Michael E. Brunner Alben C. Eisenberg Mary Margaret Whipple County Manager Larry J. Brown Prepared by Arlington County, Virginia Depanment of Community Affairs Planning, Housing, and Community Development Division Planning Section 11 Word Processing Numbers: List of Maps .............................. plb-0026 List of Figures ............................. plb-0027 List of Tables ............................. plb-0028 Major Recommendations .................... plb-0030 Concept Plan ............................. plb-0016 Background .............................. plb-0020 Land Use and Zoning ....................... plb-0022 Commercial Redevelopment ................. plb-0023 Urban Design. .............. plb-0015 Transponation ............................ plb-0018 Utilities .................................. plb-0021 Community Facilities ....................... plb-0019 Appendix A.. ..... plb-0060 Appendix B .............................. plb-0128 Tabular Summary of Zoning Ordinance ........ plb-0330 Plan Designation ........................... original Zoning Ordinance-Sec. 27 A "C-R". plb-0062 Glossary of Planning Terms ................... .41-13 Clarendon Review Committee ............... plb-0029 Bibliography ............................. plb-0063 Acknowledgements ........................ plb-0129 CLftRLnDOn Contents Concept Plan .............. 1 Background . 11 Land Use and Zoning ....... 25 Commercial
    [Show full text]
  • Shopping Essentials for Your Home
    SHOPPING ESSENTIALS FOR YOUR HOME TARGET Take the Red line metro towards Shady Grove. Get off http:// www.target.com at the Tenleytown-AU Metro Station. Store right across from metro exit. Sells everything from clothing, room supplies (sheets, towels), appliances, organizational and school supplies to furniture, cosmetics, food, etc. Pentagon Center 1201 S Hayes St, Arlington, VA Columbia Heights Take the Yellow line towards Huntington. Get off at 3100 14th St NW the Pentagon City Station. Walk out of the metro Take the Yellow/Green line Metro headed towards Fort station and cross the street. Totten/Greenbelt. Get off at the Columbia Heights Metro Station and walk half a block north on 14th St. THE CONTAINER STORE http://www.containerstore.com BED, BATH AND BEYOND http://www.bedbathandbeyond.com Sells boxes, bags and small furniture to organize your clothing and other belongings and to save space. Sells sheets, towels, pillows, appliances, etc. Arlington Gallery Place – Chinatown 2800 Clarendon Blvd, Arlington, VA 709 7th St NW Take the Red line Metro towards Shady Grove. Get off at Metro Center Station and switch to the Orange line Columbia Heights train headed towards Vienna-Fairfax. Get off at the 3100 14th St NW Clarendon Station. Walk approx. 3 blocks up Take the Yellow/Green line Metro headed towards Fort Clarendon Boulevard. Totten/Greenbelt. Get off at the Columbia Heights Metro Station and walk half a block north on 14th St. Tenleytown 4500 Wisconsin Ave Pentagon Row Take the Red line metro towards Shady Grove. Get off 900 Army Navy Drive, Arlington, VA at the Tenleytown-AU Metro StationStation.
    [Show full text]
  • Clarendon Sector Plan | 2006
    CLARENDON SECTOR PLAN | 2006 CONTENTS CLARENDON SECTOR PLAN 2006 Adopted December 2006 Prepared by Arlington County, Virginia Department of Community Planning, Housing and Development, Planning Division Arlington County Board Members Christopher Zimmerman, Chairman Paul Ferguson, Vice Chairman Barbara A. Favola Jay Fisette J. Walter Tejada County Manager Ron Carlee CLARENDON SECTOR PLAN ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Appreciation is expressed to the members of the Clarendon Sector Plan Task Force and the Clarendon Working Group who contributed their time and valuable thoughts to the sector planning process. These members participated in numerous task force meetings and public workshops, reviewed various documents through the process including early drafts of the sector plan, and provided thoughtful comments on the plan resulting in a useful document for the future. Clarendon Task Force Monica Craven, Co-Chair, Planning Commission Appointee Albert Lewis, Ballston-Virginia Square Civic Association Representative-Alternate Jeff Miller, Co-Chair, Transportation Commission Peter Marsh, Lyon Village Citizens Association Representative–Alternate Melissa Bondi, Lyon Park Citizens Association Representative* Laurey Millspaugh, Major Property Owner/Developer Dennis Burr, Ballston-Virginia Square Civic Association Representative* Neal Nichols, Major Property Owner/Developer–Alternate Charles Craig, Historic Affairs and Landmarks Review Board Representative Peter Owen, Transportation Commission Representative* David DeCamp, Major Property Owner/Developer Tom Petty,
    [Show full text]
  • NSF Arlington Transportation Management Program
    NSF Arlington Transportation Management Program Naval District Washington NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK NSF Arlington Transportation Management Program Final February 2014 Prepared for: Prepared by: THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND CONTEXT 6 4.7 Active Commuting Programs (Bicycling and Walking) 47 1.1 Goals and Objectives 6 4.8 Variable Work Schedules 47 1.2 Transportation Management Programs 6 4.9 Guaranteed Ride Home 47 1.3 The Regional Transportation Vision 7 5.0 MASTER PLAN LAND USE PROPOSALS: TRANSPORTATION IMPLICATIONS 48 1.4 NSF Arlington 9 5.1 Anticipated Land Use Changes 48 2.0 EXISTING TRANSPORTATION CONDITIONS 12 5.2 Employee Density Implications 48 2.1 Local Bus/Metrorail Services 13 5.3 Trip Generation / Modal Split Impacts 48 2.2 Nearby Transit Hub Centers 18 5.4 Master Plan Parking Supply Impacts 50 2.3 Commuter Rail Service 20 5.5 Multi-modal Provisions 50 2.4 Commuter Bus Service 21 6.0 PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT 52 2.5 Shuttle Service 22 PROGRAM 52 2.6 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities 22 6.1 Employee Transportation Coordinator 57 2.7 Roadways 24 6.2 Parking Management 57 2.8 Gate Counts and Vehicle Classification 26 6.3 Transit Subsidies 57 2.9 Parking 28 6.4 Alternative Work Schedule and Telecommuting 57 2.10 Ridesharing 30 6.5 Shuttle Service 57 2.11 Employee Survey Results 31 6.6 Ridesharing 3.0 AREA PLANNING CONTEXT 41 6.7 Active Commuting Programs (Bicycling and Walking) 58 3.1 Columbia Pike Land Use and Housing Planning Studies
    [Show full text]
  • Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. (Form: 10-K, Received: 03/31/2021
    2020 Annual Report Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. Fellow Shareholders, We entered 2020 with great enthusiasm about the prospects for our company as we sought to build on our achievements of 2019. Key achievements during 2019 included completion of the multi-year transformation of our operating platform to focus primarily on commercial real estate asset management and development of mixed-use and transit-oriented properties in high-growth areas of the Washington, DC region, expanding the scope to solidify the value of asset management agreements covering Comstock’s ~$3 Billion Anchor Portfolio at full build-out, vertically integrating operations to create multiple new revenue sources, securing high quality corporate tenants for significant portions of our Anchor Portfolio, and enhancing our balance sheet to create access to growth capital. In late 2019 we also launched our institutional venture platform; a key strategic initiative that provides significant opportunity for Comstock going forward. By early 2020, it was evident the Covid-19 pandemic would create unprecedented challenges for world economies and the human race. In spite of these challenges, Comstock’s exceptional workforce accomplished much during 2020, most notably delivering a 133% increase of net income over 2019 results. As a result, we enter 2021 well positioned to build upon recent accomplishments and continue our recent pattern of growth in key areas of earnings and assets under management. In early 2020, when it became clear the pandemic would result in governmental shutdown orders for all but essential workforces, we promptly initiated enhanced safety protocols to ensure the safety of our workforce, deemed essential pursuant to Executive Orders of the states in which we operate.
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Fiscal 2007 Annual Budget
    APPROVED FISCAL 2007 ANNUAL BUDGET Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority APPROVED FISCAL 2007 ANNUAL BUDGET WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY APPROVED FISCAL 2007 ANNUAL BUDGET TABLE OF CONTENTS VISION STATEMENT, MISSION STATEMENT, AND STRATEGIC.................................1 Vision Statement and Strategic Goals......................................................................................3 ANNUAL BUDGET SUMMARY ................................................................................................5 ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING ........................................................................................11 DIVISION BUDGETS.................................................................................................................17 DIVISIONS BY COST CENTER ..............................................................................................21 OPERATING BUDGET .............................................................................................................93 Ridership and Revenue ...........................................................................................................101 Metrobus .................................................................................................................................107 Metrorail .................................................................................................................................125 Metro Access ..........................................................................................................................139
    [Show full text]