DOCSLIB.ORG

Design and Placement of Transit Stops

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Design and Placement of Transit Stops Guidelines Design and Placement of Transit Stops Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority DECEMBER 2009 FINAL REPORT Prepared by: KFH GROUP, INC. Guidelines for the Design and Placement of Transit Stops for the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Final Report December, 2009 Under Subcontract to: P2D Prepared for the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority 4920 Elm Street, Suite 350 — Bethesda, Maryland — (301) 951-8660 — FAX (301) 951-0026 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Section 1 -- Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1-1 Purpose................................................................................................................................. 1-1 Contents of Report .............................................................................................................. 1-1 Section 2 – Bus Stop Placement and Type ............................................................................. 2-1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 2-1 Bus Stop Locations.............................................................................................................. 2-1 Curb-Side Bus Stop.............................................................................................................2-8 Curb Bulb........................................................................................................................... 2-11 Bus Bay............................................................................................................................... 2-12 Curb Heigh......................................................................................................................... 2-15 Section 3 – Bus Stop Elements and Passenger Amenities ................................................... 3-1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 3-1 Bus Stop Hierarchy .............................................................................................................3-1 Bus Stop Signs ..................................................................................................................... 3-4 Bus Stop Sign Post............................................................................................................... 3-6 Information Case................................................................................................................. 3-7 Lighting ................................................................................................................................ 3-9 ADA Landing Pads/Passenger Waiting Area.............................................................. 3-10 Freestanding Bench........................................................................................................... 3-12 Shelters................................................................................................................................ 3-13 Trash Receptacles.............................................................................................................. 3-17 Vendor Boxes..................................................................................................................... 3-17 Bus Stop Prototypes.......................................................................................................... 3-18 Bus Shelter Maps............................................................................................................... 3-24 Incorporation of Public Art.............................................................................................. 3-26 Table of Contents Page Section 4 – Bus Stop Spacing and Consolidation Impact Analysis.................................... 4-1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 4-1 Spacing Guidelines.............................................................................................................4-2 Bus Stop Consolidation Impact Analysis ........................................................................ 4-4 Summary ............................................................................................................................ 4-14 Appendix A: Local Jurisdiction Standards and Guidelines Jurisdictions within the Metro Service Area .................................................................. A-1 Other Transit Systems that Operate within the Metro Service Area.......................... A-5 Summary of Standards, Guidelines, Policies, and Practices Currently Followed in the Region ............................................................................................... A-7 Appendix B: Other Resources Reviewed Literatures Review..............................................................................................................B-1 Examples of Bus Stop Location and Design Standards in Other Areas....................B-12 Appendix C: Public Input Appendix D: Findings for the 103 Analyzed Metrobus Lines Final Report - Introduction Section 1 Introduction PURPOSE The bus stop guidelines provided in this report are intended to provide Metro and its jurisdictional partners specific physical design criteria to be integrated with local comprehensive plan policies, land use ordinances, pedestrian plans, and street design guidelines. The design guidelines may also be used as a basis when working with local jurisdictions in planning access improvements to transit facilities. Developers or builders who are interested in developing transit friendly projects may also make use of these design guidelines. CONTENTS OF REPORT The design guidelines developed in this report are based on a review of current guidelines used by the local jurisdictions in the Metro service area, discussions with Metro staff and regional partners, input received at the public open house, a literature review, and review of standards and guidelines used in other metropolitan areas. Appendix A provides a detailed documentation of existing bus stop standards, guidelines, policies, and practices in the local jurisdiction. Appendix B provides a detailed summary of locally and nationally published bus stop design resources and examples of standards and guidelines in other areas. In addition to the extensive review of existing bus stop standards and guidelines, an effort was also made to solicit input from the public through an Open House. The public, the local jurisdiction, and stakeholders were notified and invited to the Open House. Information collected at the Open House is provided in Appendix C. The following sections of this report are organized as follows: • Section 2: Bus Stop Placement and Type. This section presents guidelines for improving bus passenger experience at the street level. Provided are discussions of appropriate bus stop placement relative to the intersection and Development of Guidelines for the Design and Placement of Transit Stops for WMATA 1-1 Final Report - Introduction different types of street-side designs such as on-street stops, curb-bulbs, and bus bays. • Section 3: Bus Stop Elements and Passenger Amenities. This section presents guidelines for improving the accessibility to bus stops and the coordination of bus stop elements such as bus stop signs, bus stop posts, information cases, customer information, bus stop shelters, benches, bus stop lighting, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) landing pads, trash receptacles, vendor boxes, and art at transit stops. Also provided in this section are prototypical designs of bus stop facilities that are typical for the Washington Metropolitan region. • Section 4 – Bus Stop Spacing: This section presents guidelines on appropriate spacing between bus stop locations and an analysis of the current spacing between stops for the Metrobus lines. Applying the recommended bus stop spacing, four bus stop consolidation scenarios were developed identifying potential running time and cost savings. Development of Guidelines for the Design and Placement of Transit Stops for WMATA 1-2 Final Report – Bus Stop Placement and Type Section 2 Bus Stop Placement and Type INTRODUCTION The following guidelines focus on the needs of bus operators and bus passengers in the road right of way. Proper planning for bus facilities should be a major part of most road design. Safety is the most important consideration in planning for pedestrian facilities linking bus stops to passengers’ origins and destinations. Therefore pedestrian facilities, such as clear demarcation of pedestrian crossings and the provision of properly designed sidewalks, should be given high priority in the design of streets. Universal design solutions should be utilized so that all people, with the widest range of abilities and circumstances can have equal access to transit. Universal design differs from the ADA Accessible Guidelines (ADAAG) in that while the ADAAG prescribes minimum design criteria to accommodate most persons with disabilities, universal design takes into consideration the broader population (i.e. children, seniors, bicyclists, parents pushing strollers) including persons with disabilities. More information can be found regarding universal design in the Principles of Universal Design by the Center for Universal Design at North Carolina State University. BUS STOP LOCATIONS The
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Zakaria 2003 Institutional Issues for Advanced Transit S…
    Institutional Issues for Deployment of Advanced Public Transportation Systems for Transit-Oriented Development in the Kuala Lumpur Metropolitan Area AY 2002/2003 Spring Report Zulina Zakaria Massachusetts Institute of Technology July 17, 2003 Institutional Issues for Deployment of Advanced Public Transportation Systems for TOD in KLMA Zulina Zakaria AY 2002/2003 Spring Report July 17, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction .........................................................................................................................................................4 1.1 Existing Public Transportation and Traffic Congestion ...................................................................................4 1.2 Vision of Public Transportation and ITS ........................................................................................................5 1.3 Purpose of Report.......................................................................................................................................6 1.4 Report Organization ....................................................................................................................................7 2 Background .........................................................................................................................................................7 2.1 Problem of Urban Mobility in Developing Countries and Possible Solutions ....................................................7 2.2 Land Use–Transport Interactions and Transit Oriented Development .............................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Res-Urban-20.Pdf
    Transit Friendly Design Features INTRODUCTION North American municipal and regional planning authorities are pursuing urban growth management strategies that preserve or improve urban “livability”. In the Lower Mainland, concerns about air quality and traffic congestion are central themes in regional planning, such as the GVRD Creating Our Future program, and the Transport 2021 project. Growing communities throughout BC share similar concerns. These studies identify a larger role for public transit as a key strategy for achieving a reduction in the number of automobile trips and an improved urban environment. Achieving higher transit ridership is a challenge in an automobile oriented society, and transit agencies should not bear this responsibility alone. Public Transit in B.C. Public transit is provided in over 58 municipal areas in British Columbia, including conventional, paratransit and handyDART services. BC Transit is responsible for planning, funding, marketing, and implementation of these systems. In the regions of Victoria and Vancouver, BC Transit operates these services. In other areas of the province, BC Transit works in partnership with local governments and private contractors to provide transit service. Public transit is simply the movement of people in groups, generally in large vehicles operating on fixed routes and schedules. These services are available to the public at fares that vary from community to community. The conventional bus is the most common vehicle in use in larger urban areas. The emphasis here is on integrating conventional bus service with land use planning. 1 Transit and Land Use Planning Making the Transit Connection ... to Land Use In order to attract more transit customers, the strong influence of land use and urban design on travel behaviour needs to be recognized and utilized to the advantage of transit.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study
    Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks
    [Show full text]
  • [Title Over Two Lines (Shift+Enter to Break Line)]
    BUS TRANSFORMATION PROJECT White Paper #2: Strategic Considerations October 2018 DRAFT: For discussion purposes 1 1 I• Purpose of White Paper II• Vision & goals for bus as voiced by stakeholders III• Key definitions IV• Strategic considerations Table of V• Deep-dive chapters to support each strategic consideration Contents 1. What is the role of Buses in the region? 2. Level of regional commitment to speeding up Buses? 3. Regional governance / delivery model for bus? 4. What business should Metrobus be in? 5. What services should Metrobus operate? 6. How should Metrobus operate? VI• Appendix: Elasticity of demand for bus 2 DRAFT: For discussion purposes I. Purpose of White Paper 3 DRAFT: For discussion purposes Purpose of White Paper 1. Present a set of strategic 2. Provide supporting analyses 3. Enable the Executive considerations for regional relevant to each consideration Steering Committee (ESC) to bus transformation in a neutral manner set a strategic direction for bus in the region 4 DRAFT: For discussion purposes This paper is a thought piece; it is intended to serve as a starting point for discussion and a means to frame the ensuing debate 1. Present a The strategic considerations in this paper are not an set of strategic exhaustive list of all decisions to be made during this considerations process; they are a set of high-level choices for the Bus Transformation Project to consider at this phase of for regional strategy development bus transformation Decisions on each of these considerations will require trade-offs to be continually assessed throughout this effort 5 DRAFT: For discussion purposes Each strategic consideration in the paper is 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Planning Practice in the Age of Transit-Oriented Development by Ian Robinson Carlton a Dissertation Submitted in Partial
    Transit Planning Practice in the Age of Transit-Oriented Development By Ian Robinson Carlton A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in City & Regional Planning in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Daniel Chatman, Chair Professor Robert Cervero Professor Dwight Jaffee Fall 2013 © Copyright by Ian Robinson Carlton 2013 All Rights Reserved Abstract Transit Planning Practice in the Age of Transit-Oriented Development by Ian Robinson Carlton Doctor of Philosophy in City & Regional Planning University of California, Berkeley Professor Daniel Chatman, Chair Globally, urban development near transit stations has long been understood to be critical to transit’s success primarily because it can contribute to ridership and improve the efficiency of transit investments. In the United States in particular, fixed-guideway transit’s land use-shaping capability has been an important justification and goal for transit investment. In fact, today’s U.S. federal funding policies increasingly focus on achieving transit-oriented real estate development near new transit infrastructure. However, the widespread implementation of transit and land use coordination practices has been considered an uphill battle. The academic literature suggests the most effective practice may be for U.S. transit planners to locate transit stations where pre-existing conditions are advantageous for real estate development or transit investments can generate the political will to dramatically alter local conditions to make them amenable to real estate development. However, prior to this study, no research had investigated the influence of real estate development considerations on U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • New Business Tracking
    2011 Major Transit Initiatives City of Alexandria / DASH Name of Transit System: City of Alexandria / DASH Initiative Description of Initiative New Service, Service Enhancement, Incentives Description or examples of new or improved transit service implemented, new technology (i.e. WiFi), free bus pass, etc. New DASH AT2X Service from King Street Station to the Mark Center On August 8, 2011, DASH began providing 10 minute headway express service from King Street Station to the BRAC-133 complex at the Maark Center. New WMATA 7M Service from the Pentagon to the Mark Center. On August 8, 2011, WMATA began providing 10 minute headway express service from Pentagon to the BRAC-133 complex at the Maark Center. The City worked with the DOD to implement a new transit center at the Mark Center Business/Resident/Commuter Marketing Initiatives Description or examples of advertising, promotion, direct mail, facebook/twitter, events, etc. Advocacy Description of activity or member ship to APTA, local Chamber of Commerce, etc Major Transit Initiatives Name of Transit System: Arlington Transit (ART) Initiative Description of Initiative New Service, Service Enhancement, Incentives Description or examples of new or improved transit service implemented, new technology (i.e. WiFi), free bus pass, etc. Taking data from the dispatch/AVL/CAD system and 1) presenting it in a map module that allows selection of stop by route or location with a pop up showing next RealTime bus arrival system arrival times, 2) presenting it through an Internet url also allowing search by stop number or routes. Worked with CAD contractor to develop GTFS presentation system and making it available to the public through a commuterpage.com interface with RSS feed for GTFS interface updates.
    [Show full text]
  • Design a Subway Station Mosaic That Reflects Their Home Or School Neighborhood and Draw It
    MILES OF TILES MILES OF TILES BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOR TEACHERS “Design and aesthetics have been a part of the subway from the original stations of 1904 to the latest work in 2018. But nothing in New York stands still – certainly not the subway - and the approach to subway style has evolved, reflecting the major stages of the system’s construction during the early 1900s, the teens, and the late 20s and early 30s and the renovations and redesigns of later years. The earliest parts of the system still convey the flowery, genteel flavor of a smaller, older city. Later sections, by contrast, show a conscious turn toward the modern, including open admiration for the system’s raw structural power. The evolution of subway design follows the trajectory of the world of art and architecture as these came to terms with the Industrial revolution, and the tug-of-war between a traditional deference to European models and a modernist ideology demanding an honest expression of contemporary industrial technology.” —Subway style: 100 years of Architecture & Design in the New York City Subway New York City, in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, was an industrial hub attracting many Americans from rural communities looking for work, and immigrants looking for better lives. It was, however, blighted by impoverished neighborhoods of broken down tenements and social injustice. The city lacked a plan for how it should look, where structures should be built, or how services should be distributed. It was described as a ‘ragged pincushion of towers’ with no government regulation over the urban landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for the Safe Siting of School Bus Stops
    Guidelines for the safe location of school bus stops 1. How are bus stops determined? Bus stops will be placed on public roadways and will avoid travel on private roads and/or driveways Bus routes are designed with buses traveling on main arterials with students picked up and dropped off at central locations. Visibility – Bus drivers need to have at least 500 feet of visible roadway to the bus stop. If there is not ample visibility (e.g. curve or hill) a “school bus stop ahead sign” is put in place before the stop in accordance with WAC 392-145-030 Bus drivers activate their school bus warning lights 300-100 feet before arriving at the bus stop, where the posted speed limit is 35 mph and under, and 500-300 feet before arriving at the bus stop where the posted speed limit is 35 mph and over. 2. Why are bus stops located at corners? Bus stops may be located at corners or intersections whenever possible. Corner stops are much more visible to drivers than house numbers. Students are generally taught to cross at corners rather than in the middle of the street. Traffic controls, such as stoplights or signs, are located at corners. These tend to slow down motorists at corners, making them more cautious as they approach intersections. The motoring public generally expects school buses to stop at corners rather than individual houses. Impatient motorists are also less likely to pass buses at corners than along a street. Cars passing school buses create the greatest risk to students who are getting on or off the bus.
    [Show full text]
  • S92 Orient Point, Greenport to East Hampton Railroad Via Riverhead
    Suffolk County Transit Bus Information Suffolk County Transit Fares & Information Vaild March 22, 2021 - October 29, 2021 Questions, Suggestions, Complaints? Full fare $2.25 Call Suffolk County Transit Information Service Youth/Student fare $1.25 7 DAY SERVICE Youths 5 to 13 years old. 631.852.5200 Students 14 to 22 years old (High School/College ID required). Monday to Friday 8:00am to 4:30pm Children under 5 years old FREE SCHEDULE Limit 3 children accompanied by adult. Senior, Person with Disabilities, Medicare Care Holders SCAT Paratransit Service and Suffolk County Veterans 75 cents Personal Care Attendant FREE Paratransit Bus Service is available to ADA eligible When traveling to assist passenger with disabilities. S92 passengers. To register or for more information, call Transfer 25 cents Office for People with Disabilities at 631.853.8333. Available on request when paying fare. Good for two (2) connecting buses. Orient Point, Greenport Large Print/Spanish Bus Schedules Valid for two (2) hours from time received. Not valid for return trip. to East Hampton Railroad To obtain a large print copy of this or other Suffolk Special restrictions may apply (see transfer). County Transit bus schedules, call 631.852.5200 Passengers Please or visit www.sct-bus.org. via Riverhead •Have exact fare ready; Driver cannot handle money. Para obtener una copia en español de este u otros •Passengers must deposit their own fare. horarios de autobuses de Suffolk County Transit, •Arrive earlier than scheduled departure time. Serving llame al 631.852.5200 o visite www.sct-bus.org. •Tell driver your destination.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Intercity Transportation in BC Overview
    InfoLine 1-800-689-2477 Title of Document: List of Intercity Transportation in BC Overview: This document contains a list of intercity transportation options available within British Columbia. Ashcroft/Clinton: BC Transit Toll Free: 1 855-359-3935 https://www.bctransit.com/ashcroft-clinton/schedules- and-maps/route-overview?route=1 Bella Coola Valley: BC Transit Ph. 250 799-0079 https://www.bctransit.com/bella-coola-valley/home Burns Lake/Smithers: BC Transit Toll Free: 1 855-499-1119 https://bctransit.com/bulkley-nechako/schedules-and- maps/route-overview?route=162 Port Hardy/Fort Rupert: BC Transit Ph. 250 956-3151 https://www.bctransit.com/mount- waddington/schedules-and-maps/route- overview?route=4 Greenwood/Grand Forks: BC Transit Ph. 250 443-2179 https://www.bctransit.com/boundary/schedules-and- maps Haida Gwaii: Eagle Transit http://eagletransit.net/ Hazeltons/Smithers BC Transit Ph. 250 842-2134 Toll Free: 1 877-842-2131 https://www.bctransit.com/hazeltons/schedules-and- maps/route-overview?route=163 For further information on SCI BC programs and services check out our website at www.sci-bc.ca Disclaimer: SCI BC will attempt to keep content information as up to date and current as possible. SCI BC does not make any representation with respect to the quality of the service or products and the customer is responsible for making all necessary inquires to protect themselves before contracting, utilizing or products Spinal Cord Injury BC 780 SW Marine Drive, Vancouver, BC V6P 5Y7 Hazeltons/Terrace BC Transit Ph. 250 842-2134 Toll Free:
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Bus Automation Risks, Barriers, & Mitigations
    Transit Bus Automation Risks, Barriers, & Mitigations Introduction In 2016, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) studied risks and barriers to transit bus automation and developed mitigations as a part of the development of its Strategic Transit Automation Research (STAR) Plan. • Risks are the potential for automated technologies, once in place, to yield negative consequences or for anticipated benefits to go unrealized. • Barriers are obstacles that could prevent or significantly challenge implementation of an automation technology. Both are challenges to the potential implementation of transit bus automation that require the development of mitigation options or strategies to overcome barriers or reduce the likelihood of a risk. This factsheet summarizes the findings of this study. For more information, please see the full report, contained in the STAR Plan. Risks Four categories of risks related to transit automation were identified: Safety and Security: Automated transit buses are at risk of potential hardware and software failures or limitations, human factor errors related to over-reliance on automated assistance or decline in driver skill, and cyber-attacks, as well as potential impedance with emergency response and communications. Operations, Maintenance, & Cost Effectiveness: Transit agencies run the risk of accumulating unrealized costs from technology and transition expenditures, workforce retraining expenses, and increased labor costs due to the need for specialized skills, and technological obsolescence. Changes in service patterns or transit funding mechanisms could lead to additional costs. In addition, automated bus transit will compete against other modes that are moving toward automation. Passenger Experience: Automation could negatively affect passenger experience, or fail to deliver expected benefits. This could include degradation in service reliability, slower travel speeds, reduced access and convenience, inadequate customer service, and poor ride quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Fiscal 2008 Annual Budget
    Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Serving the National Capital Region Approved Fiscal 2008 Annual Budget Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Approved Fiscal 2008 Annual Budget Serving the National Capital Region Table of Contents Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Approved Fiscal 2008 Annual Budget Serving the National Capital Region Table of Contents Table of Contents General Manager’s Letter......................................................................................3 Chapter 1. Introduction to Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority...............................................................................5 Metro Profile ...............................................................................................5 Metro’s Strategic Plan ................................................................................6 Metro Board of Directors and Agency Oversight ........................................7 Organization Chart .....................................................................................9 How to Contact Metro...............................................................................10 Chapter 2. Budget Summary..............................................................................13 Operating Budget .....................................................................................16 Capital Budget..........................................................................................17 Reimbursable Projects .............................................................................18
    [Show full text]