DOCSLIB.ORG

Disaster Risk Management in Nepal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Disaster Risk Management in Nepal Cover Photo: Training on search and rescue techniques using local resources, Kailali district Photo Courtesy: Mercy Corps Government of Nepal Ministry of Home Affairs NEPAL DISASTER REPORT 2011 Policies, Practices and Lessons Empowered lives. Resilient nations. Editorial Board Amod Mani Dixit Bishal Nath Upreti, Ph.D. Deepak Paudel Pitambar Aryal Pradip Kumar Koirala Shyam Sundar Jnavaly Surya Narayan Shrestha Contributors Bhubaneswari Parajuli Bijay Krishna Upadhyay Gopi Krishna Basyal Khadga Sen Oli Nisha Shrestha Niva Upreti Suraj Shrestha Suresh Chaudhary Reviewers Meen B. Poudyal Chhetri, Ph.D. Ramesh Guragain Design and Layout Chandan Dhoj Rana Magar Published by Ministry of Home Affairs (MoHA), Government of Nepal; and Disaster Preparedness Network-Nepal (DPNet-Nepal) with support from United Nations Development Programme Nepal (UNDP), ActionAid Nepal and National Society for Earthquake Technology-Nepal (NSET) This publication is copyright. But any part of this publication may be cited, copied, translated into other languages or adapted to meet local needs without prior permission from Ministry of Home Affairs (MoHA) and Disaster Preparedness Network-Nepal (DPNet-Nepal) provided that the source is clearly stated. The opinions and recommendations expressed or mentioned in this report do not necessarily represent the official position and policy of the Ministry of Home Affairs and DPNet-Nepal. ISBN: 978-99933-710-1-4 To order Nepal Disaster Report 2011, Contact Disaster Preparedness Network-Nepal (DPNet-Nepal) C/O NRCS, Red Cross Road, Kalimati Phone: 977 01 6226613, 977 01 4672165; Fax no: 977 01 4672165 Email: [email protected]; Website: http://www.dpnet.org.np Foreword | iii Acknowledgement | v Editorial NEPAL DISASTER REPORT 2011 Policies, Practices and Lessons tries to become a compendium of understanding, concepts, experiences and lessons of disaster risk management (DRM) and emergency response planning and capacity building in Nepal. It tries to reflect the current status of DRM in Nepal including peoples' aspiration and portrays the efforts made by people and agencies - the government at the central and local levels, the international development partners, the civil society and national private businesses, Editorial and the people at the ward, tole (neighborhood) and community levels, to get out of the vicious cycle of poverty and disaster vulnerabilities. Thus, this document is a compilation of facts of disaster occurrence and the efforts made in Nepal in reducing the impact of the disasters and in getting prepared for future events. The document looks into the level of natural hazards the country is exposed to, tries to explore the social, economic, and political meanings of disasters for the country, and tries to make a case on why and how Nepal should address the issues of disaster risk management in order to preserve and enhance the well-known resilience of the Nepalese to adversaries and vagaries of nature, safeguard peoples' life and property, and ensure incorporation of disaster risk reduction (DRR) into our developmental efforts. The message of this document is organized into five chapters. Chapter 1: Disaster Management in Nepal – An Overview lays out the context by providing facts on natural hazards in Nepal and their causative factors. It also provides a chronology of the development of DRM processes in the country including the government's initiatives in creating suitable policy and legal environments for effective DRR and response planning starting from the promulgation of the Natural Calamity (Relief) Act, 1982. These are given in the background of large disasters the country faced due to the 1988 Udaypur Earthquake, 1993 Floods in South-Central Nepal, lessons learned from managing these devastating events and the consequent milestone initiatives of the government such as the formulation of the National Building Code and the establishment of sector-specific Working Groups on Health, Logistics, Food and Agriculture etc. The establishment of the Disaster Prevention Technical Centre (DPTC), which subsequently metamorphosed into the Department of Water-induced Disaster Prevention (DWIDP), institutionalization of the annual Earthquake Safety Day, formulation and promulgation of the Local Self-Governance Act 1999, the Study on Earthquake Disaster Mitigation in Kathmandu Valley (SEDM) by MoHA and JICA in 2000-2002, efforts on Climate Change Impact Adaptation, constitution of the National Platform on DRR, formulation of the National Strategy for Disaster Risk Management (NSDRM), 2009 and drafting of the Disaster Risk Management Bill, preparation of Disaster Preparedness and Response Plans for a majority of districts, establishment and commissioning of the National Emergency Operations Centre (NEOC), creation of Disaster Cluster Groups, participation of Nepal in Global initiatives in DRR including the International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction (IDNDR) and the International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (ISDR), participation in the formulation of Hyogo Framework of Action (HFA) and translation of its meaning to Nepalese context, formulation of National Action Plan for Disaster Management, participation in Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction. vi | Nepal Disaster Report 2011 Experiences gained and lessons learned from such rich engagement of the government have also been described. Further, this Chapter 1 also reports on the milestone initiatives undertaken by the civil society organizations and NGOs and the lessons learned: e.g. establishment of Disaster Editorial Management section in the Nepal Red Cross Society (NRCS), establishment of National Society for Earthquake Technology-Nepal (NSET) and implementation of the Kathmandu Valley Earthquake Risk Management Program (KVERMP), establishment and landmark contributions of Disaster Preparedness Network-Nepal (DPNet-Nepal), Disaster Management Network Nepal (DiMaNN), National Network of Community Disaster Management Committee (N-NCDMC), Nepal Geological Society (NGS), Nepal Landslide Society (NELS), The Society of Hydrologists and Meteorologists – Nepal (SOHAM-Nepal), Nepal GIS Society (NEGISS), Association of International NGOs (AIN), and the Centre for Disaster Studies of the Institute of Engineering (IOE). Collective efforts of networks and agencies under such milestone programs as DIPECHO projects, Developing DRR Terminologies in Nepali language, efforts on sensitizing CA Members on DRR, Mainstreaming DRR in Nepal's Education System, Study on Strengthening Legal Preparedness for International Disaster Response are also described in terms of their contribution, impacts, challenges and lessons learned. Chapter 2: Disaster Data Analysis for 2010 provides disaster statistics for Nepal during 1971-2010, with detailed description and analysis of disaster data for the year 2010. It reports that epidemic presents itself as the most lethal hazard with a total toll of 16,521 deaths from 3,413 events during the period of past four decades. The second and third hazards with huge toll of life are landslide and flood respectively. There were 95 episodes of damaging earthquake in Nepal or its surroundings, with a total toll of 873 lives dead. One has to remember that the medium sized Udaypur Earthquake of 1988 alone was responsible for a death toll of 721 persons and collapse / damage to several thousand houses. Epidemics (130 deaths), and Landslide (67 deaths), Fire (61 deaths), Flood (27 deaths) were the most lethal hazards in the year 2010. There were a total of 1,551 disaster events in the year (almost three events per day) and more than two disaster-related deaths per day. Total monetary losses due to disaster in 2010 amounted almost to 11 billion Nepali Rupees or about 1 % of GDP. The year 2010 is witnessed less disaster impact in comparison to the years 2008, and 2009. Chapter 3: Impacts and Lessons of Major Past Disasters reports the event details, casualty and other societal impacts, damage to the different sector of economy including building, infrastructure, and provides an account of emergency response made. The events considered are the Udaypur Earthquake of 1988, the 1993 Flood of South-Central Nepal, Koshi Flood of 2008, and the 2009 Jajarkot Diarrhea Outbreak. While the events as well as the impacts have been described in details, the report has tried to distill out the major lessons and the needs for intervention in national mechanism of response in a strategic way. Chapter 4: Good Practices of Disaster Risk Management (DRM) provides details accounts of about 13 DRM programs and concepts implemented in Nepal and rightly considered as the "Good Practices". These are: 1) Disaster Preparedness and Response | vii Planning for all administrative districts of Nepal, 2) Early Warning System - Forewarned is forearmed – a flood early warning system in Kailali district, 3) Establishing Community Based Early Warning Systems in Nepal – a flood early warning system implemented in Chitwan and Nawalparasi districts of Nepal, 4) Promoting Safer Construction Practice- Training the masons in Nepal, 5) Building Code Implementation in Dharan Municipality, 6) Child Centered Disaster Risk Reduction in Sunsari District, 7) DRR Income Generation Program (IGP)/Community Based Disaster Risk Reduction Program implemented in Ilam, Jhapa and Panchthar districts, 8) Developing and Implementing Emergency Response Plan of Bheri Zonal Hospital, 9) School Earthquake Safety Program (SESP), 10) Disaster Editorial Preparedness for Safer Schools (DPSS), 11) Community
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download File
    For non-commercial distribution only All photos used in this compendium were provided by the Knowledge Management Initiative (KMI) participants. The compendium is available in English and Russian. The electronic version of the compendium can be found at: www.preventionweb.net Hard copies are available at: UNISDR CA, 37/1 Bokhtar str, 6th floor, 734000, Dushanbe, Tajikistan. UNICEF RO CEE/CIS, Avenue de la Paix 5, 1202 Genève, Switzerland. Any comments and suggestions regarding the Compendium can be addressed to: Mr. Parviz Mahmudov, Education coordinator, UNISDR CA [email protected] Mr. Asim Rehman, Regional Emergency Preparedness and DRR Specialist, UNICEF CEE/CIS [email protected] Design: Zafar Mahmoudov, Advocacy and Communications Consultant, UNISDR CA Editor: Stephen Boyle The views expressed in this Compendium are those of the respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of ECHO, UNISDR and UNICEF. Acknowledgements The Compendium of Good Practices and Tools on Disaster Risk Reduction in Education in Central Asia has been developed as a result of the Knowledge Management Initiative, implemented by the United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction in Central Asia (UNISDR) and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) within the framework of the Disaster Preparedness Programme of the European Commission’s Humanitarian Aid Department (DIPECHO) and financed by ECHO. UNISDR and UNICEF express their gratitude to all participants who submitted examples of their experiences on disaster risk reduction in education: Mr. Timur Idrisov, NGO “Little Earth”, Tajikistan; Ms. Lyudmila Bakhareva, NGO “Man and elements”, Kazakhstan; Mr. Alexandr Kravchuk, UNDP Kazakhstan, Kazakhstan; Mr. Khusan Tursunov, NGO “HAYOT”, Uzbekistan; Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • DIFFUSING SEISMIC SAFETY J. E. Rodgers1, V. Cedillos1, L. T
    Proceedings of the 9th U.S. National and 10th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering Compte Rendu de la 9ième Conférence Nationale Américaine et 10ième Conférence Canadienne de Génie Parasismique July 25-29, 2010, Toronto, Ontario, Canada • Paper No 1604 DIFFUSING SEISMIC SAFETY J. E. Rodgers1, V. Cedillos1, L. T. Tobin2, B. E. Tucker3, and H. Kumar4 ABSTRACT Despite the efforts of the earthquake engineering and earth science communities, global earthquake risk continues to grow at a rapid rate. The increase in risk occurs primarily in the rapidly growing cities of the developing world, where engineering issues are often the most easily solved part of the problem. Earthquake resistant methods for building new structures and retrofitting existing ones are available. The challenges are for local people to understand that they are at risk from earthquakes and that risk should and can be managed, and to build the political support for the idea that all elements of society should pay for risk management activities. The theory of the diffusion of innovations, which is widely applied in other professions, provides the techniques to address these challenges. GeoHazards International (GHI) has developed a diffusion-based approach to introduce earthquake safety ideas and practices. The approach applies to both technical ideas and practices, such as performance-based earthquake engineering or specific retrofit methods, and to basic risk reduction measures that empower schoolchildren, their families, teachers, government officials, hospital personnel, and others to make themselves safer now. This paper presents examples from GHI’s projects in India, Pakistan, Indonesia and Nepal, and provides suggestions for enhancing the diffusion process in future earthquake safety projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Practical Science for Uncertain Futures Using Scenarios to Improve Resilience to Earthquakes John Young, Susan Njambi-Szlapka and Janise Rodgers November 2019
    Working paper 563 Practical science for uncertain futures Using scenarios to improve resilience to earthquakes John Young, Susan Njambi-Szlapka and Janise Rodgers November 2019 Earthquake disaster risk resilience is an example of a complex problem that requires decision- making and action from different stakeholders. These multiple stakeholders each have different and sometimes competing agendas, as well as different understandings of the nature of the problem. Abstract We outline here the use of transdisciplinary research and futures studies as methods for tackling this type of complex problem. These offer practical steps to bring together stakeholders and actors from different disciplines and different lay perspectives to (1) agree a common understanding of the problem, (2) think systematically about how these problems may play out in the future, and (3) come up with actionable, strategic plans that bring the results to fruition on the ground. Drawing on the theoretical literature about futures studies and transdisciplinary approaches, as well as lessons from various practical applications, we find that scenarios are among the most widely used transdisciplinary futures approaches. There are several approaches to scenario building, depending on the aims of the exercise and the availability of resources. In particular, we explore the Geohazards International approach, which has been used with great success in resource-constrained contexts. Readers are encouraged to reproduce material for their own publications, as long as they are not being sold commercially. ODI requests due acknowledgement and a copy of the publication. For online use, we ask readers to link to the original resource on the ODI website. The views presented in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of ODI or our partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Tsunami and Other Coastal Hazards Information Kit for the Caribbean Media
    Tsunami and Other Coastal Hazards Information Kit for the Caribbean Media Tsunami & Other Coastal Hazards Warning System Project ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Tsunami and Other Coastal Hazards Information Kit for the Caribbean Media was developed through the Tsunami and Other Coastal Hazards Warning System Project, which was implemented by the Caribbean Disaster Emergency Management Agency (CDEMA) [formerly CDERA] over the period 2007 - 2010. The document was produced by The Seismic Research Centre, University of the West Indies (SRC, UWI). Special appreciation is extended to the Tsunami and Other Coastal Hazards Warning System Project Public Awareness and Education Technical Sub-Committee and the UNESCO IOC International Tsunami Information Centre (ITIC). The development and publication of this Tsunami and Other Coastal Hazards Information Kit for the Caribbean Media have been made possible through the financial support of the United States Agency for International Development/ Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance (USAID/OFDA) and the in-kind contributions from CDEMA Participating States. This activity is co-funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the donor agencies supporting the activity or of CDEMA (formerly CDERA). © 2010 This document and any updates to it are available at www.cdema.org, www.weready.org and www.uwiseismic.com. Caribbean Disaster Emergency Management Agency (CDEMA) Building #1, Manor Lodge Complex Lodge Hill, St. Michael, Barbados, West Indies University of the West Indies Seismic Research Centre St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago United States Agency for International Development US Embassy Complex, Wildey Business Park Wildey, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Schools Are Highly Vulnerable If Not Properly Constructed and Prepared for Earthquakes
    Safer Society NSET Report 2014 National Society for Earthquake Technology-Nepal (NSET) Cover Photo (Front) Students' Summit on Earthqauke Safety 2013, Sauraha, Chitwan Cover Photo (Back) Retrofitting of Adarsha L.S. School, Chiyabari, Ilam June 2014 Book Publication Series: NSET-097-2014 ©NSET ii | Safer Society NSET Report 2014 Message We are here again with the NSET Report 2014. This report presents an account of NSET's endeavors and activities towards the enhancement of disaster resilience of from the communities in Nepal during the past year. This year has been momentous in the sense that it marks 20 years of collaboration, commitment and partnering in disaster risk President management. NSET strongly believes that the earthquake resilience of communities can be achieved through enhancing awareness and building capacity by helping them to understand seismic risk and providing them with simple and practical methods in mitigating the risks. NSET is grateful that its work has been recognized with the wider acceptance of concepts, methodologies and safety measures NSET has been developing and propagating in Nepal and the region. On behalf of the NSET Executive Committee, I would like to thank all Government agencies, civil society organizations, international agencies and individuals for their Shiva Bahadur initiatives and partnerships with NSET in their Disaster Risk Management Programs. Pradhanang In conclusion, I would personally like to commend all the staff at NSET for their hard and dedicated work. With your continued and sustained efforts, I'm sure that NSET Vision of 'Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal by 2020' will materialize. Thank you! Safer Society | iii NSET Report 2014 Message Our National Society for Earthquake Technology -Nepal (NSET) has completed its 20 years of service to the nation and the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaster Risk Management in South Asia: a Regional Overview
    DISASTER RISK & CLIMATE CHANGE UNIT DSouth CAsia Region - World Bank The World Bank Group • South Asia Region Disaster Risk Management and Climate Change Unit • Sustainable Development Network December 2012 DISASTER RISK & CLIMATE CHANGE UNIT DSouth CAsia Region - World Bank Disaster Risk Management in South Asia: A Regional Overview The World Bank, 1818 H Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20433, U.S.A. Internet: www.worldbank.org All Rights Reserved Printed in Washington, DC First Printing: December, 2012 The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this book are entirely those of the authors and should not be attributed in any manner to the World Bank, to its affiliated organizations, or to members of its Board of Executive Directors or the countries they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. The boundaries, colors, denomina- tions, and other information shown on any map in this volume do not imply on the part of The World Bank Group any judgment on the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will promptly grant permission to reproduce portions of the work under normal circumstances. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, as well as all other queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, please send a request with complete details to the Office of the Publisher, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax: 202-522-2422; e-mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery of Sediment Indicating Rapid Lake-Level
    Discovery of sediment indicating rapid lake-level fall in the late Pleistocene Gokarna Formation, Kathmandu Valley, Nepal: implication for terrace formation Tetsuya Sakai, Tomohiro Takagawa, Ananta Prasad Gajurel, Hideo Tabata, Nobuo Ooi, Bishal Nath Upreti To cite this version: Tetsuya Sakai, Tomohiro Takagawa, Ananta Prasad Gajurel, Hideo Tabata, Nobuo Ooi, et al.. Discov- ery of sediment indicating rapid lake-level fall in the late Pleistocene Gokarna Formation, Kathmandu Valley, Nepal: implication for terrace formation. Quaternary Research, Elsevier, 2006, 45(2), pp.99- 112. hal-00109562 HAL Id: hal-00109562 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00109562 Submitted on 24 Oct 2006 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Running head: Discovery of sediment indicating rapid lake level fall Discovery of sediment indicating rapid lake-level fall in the late Pleistocene Gokarna Formation, Kathmandu Valley, Nepal: implication for terrace formation Tetsuya SAKAI,1 Tomohiro TAKAGAWA,2 Ananta P. GAJUREL,3 Hideo TABATA,4 Nobuo O'I5 and Bishal N. UPRETI3 1. Department of Geoscience, Shimane University, Shimane690-8504, Japan 2. Division of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Tsuinfo Alert, Vol. 13, No. 1, February 2011
    Contents Volume 13, Number 1 February 2011 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Special features Departments Report from American Samoa 1 News 14 National Weather Service directive 6 Websites 15 A critical link...Amateur radio operators 8 Publications 14 FEMA considers changes to CERT 9 Career tips 16 IS-22, Are you ready? Citizen preparedness guide 10 Classes, training, webinars 15 CERT behind bars 11 Material added to NTHMP Library 15 6 steps to create tsunami evacuation maps 11 IAQ 19 Sustainable Marine Research Center studies tsunamis 13 Video reservations 20 Bypassing bureaucracy to aid communications 13 Regional reports 3 Creating CERT in the private sector 16 NTHMP reports 4 FEMA honors local achievement in community resilience 18 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Report from American Samoa Several important emergency management lessons were driven home by the 2009 tsunami Submitted by John Goeke The tsunami had what will be a permanent impact on building practice in the territory. Not surprisingly, the traditional ―fale‖ style buildings which are raised oval platforms with roofs but no walls sustained very little damage even if they were totally inundated. More substantial buildings that were built in this post and ring beam style with walls but many large win- dows also escaped major structural damage. Steep hills close to the shore line severely limit the space for building and make it nearly impossible to relocate buildings to higher ground. Many people whose homes were destroyed have decided to re- build on the same footprint. Even the village of Poloa where the water rose nearly 50 feet will likely rebuild everything ex- cept the school.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Schools Are Vulnerable to Earthquakes Abstract Introduction
    Why Schools are Vulnerable to Earthquakes Janise Rodgers, Ph.D, P.E. Project Manager Abstract School buildings frequently collapse or are heavily damaged in earthquakes. In the past decade, tens of thousands of children lost their lives when their schools collapsed. Thousands more escaped serious injury or death solely because the earthquake that flattened their school occurred outside of school hours. In a world where we strive for education for all, why do schools collapse in earthquakes? This paper explores the physical reasons why – the characteristics of school buildings that cause them to be vulnerable to earthquake damage and collapse – using data from earthquake damage reports and seismic vulnerability assessments of school buildings. These data show that characteristics related to building configuration, type, materials and location; construction and inspection practices; and maintenance and post-construction modifications all contribute to building vulnerability. In particular, physical characteristics of school buildings such as large classroom windows, when combined with inadequate structural design and construction practices, create major vulnerabilities that result in earthquake damage. Using expert opinion in the published literature, the paper also explores the underlying drivers that allow unsafe school buildings to persist in vastly different settings around the world. These drivers include scarce resources, inadequate seismic building codes, unskilled building professionals, and a lack of awareness of earthquake risk and risk reduction measures. Introduction Schools have distinct physical and organizational characteristics that cause them to be vulnerable to earthquakes. Seismic vulnerability manifests itself most dramatically in building collapses that kill teachers and students, but also through hazardous falling objects such as parapets, via inadequate exits, and by a general lack of preparedness.
    [Show full text]
  • World Wetland Day 2008
    World Wetland Day 2008 Final Report Prepared by: Hindu Kush Himalayan Benthological Society (HKH BENSO) Kaushaltar, Bhaktapur Phone: ++977-1-9841398083 E-mail: [email protected] Program: National Seminar on ‘Healthy Wetlands, Healthy People’ Venue: Seminar Hall, Hotel Sunshine, Nagarkot, Bhaktapur, Nepal. Organizer: Hindu Kush Himalayan Benthological Society, Bhaktapur, Nepal. The Advisory Board: Dr. Bandana Pradhan, Associate. Professor, Institute of Medicine, T.U. Mr. Bhawani Kharel, IUCN Dr. Bhupendra Devkota, Principal, College of Applied Science Prof. Dr. Bishal Nath Upreti, Dean, Institute of Science and Technology, T.U. Mr. Deepak Chhetry Karki, HOD, Dept. of Env. Sc., Tri-Chandra College, T.U. Dr. Dinesh Raj Bhuju, National Academy of Science and Technology (NAST), Lalitpur Mr. Jhamak B. Karki, Assist. Ecologist, GoN /DNPWC Dr. Kayo Devi Yami, Chief. Science and Technology, NAST. Mr. Laxmi Prasad Manandhar, GoN /DNPWC Dr. Madan Koirala (CDES, Tribhuvan University) Ms. Neera Pradhan, Program Manager –Freshwater, WWF Nepal Dr. Rajan Suwal (Principal, Khwopa College) Dr. Siddhartha Bajra Bajracharya, NTNC Mr. Ukesh Raj Bhuju, Nepal National Committee of IUCN Members The Seminar Organizing Committee: Chairman: Mr. Deep Narayan Shah Vice Chairman: Ms. Ram Devi Tachamo Secretary: Mr. Gyan Kumar Chhipi Shrestha Program Coordinator: Mr. Kamal Gosai Treasurer: Mr. Pramod Bhagat Member: Mr. Krishna Raut Mr. Bhupendra Sharma Mr. Pabitra Dahal Ms. Manju Sapkota Mr. Sanjan Thapa Ms. Mangleswori Donju World Wetland Day 2008 Celebration - Report
    [Show full text]
  • ([email protected]) Wilfred Iwan California In
    EXPERT PANEL – BIOGRAPHICAL SUMMARIES Brian E. Tucker, GeoHazards International ([email protected]) Brian Tucker has a Masters degree in Public Policy from Harvard University and a PhD in Earth Sciences from Scripps Institution of Oceanography. His professional career began as a research scientist at Scripps and later in the Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, MIT. He later worked as Deputy Chief of the California Division of Mines and Geology. In 1991, he and colleagues in Japan and the United States founded GeoHazards International (GHI), a non-profit organisation that aims to reduce death and suffering from geological hazards in the world’s most at-risk communities (www.geohaz.org). Since then, GHI has contributed to improving seismic safety in Quito, Ecuador; Kathmandu, Nepal; Tijuana, Mexico; Guayaquil, Ecuador; Antofagasta, Chile; and the five Central Asian republics of the former Soviet Union. Currently, GHI is working to improve the earthquake risk management of cities in India, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan. In 2000, he received a decoration from the King of Nepal for GHI’s work in the country, and in 2002 he was named a MacArthur Fellow. Wilfred Iwan California Institute of Technology ([email protected]) Wilfred Iwan has a PhD from Caltech. He was the founding President and is presently a member of the Board of Directors of the Consortium Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering (CUREE). He served two separate terms as Chair of the California Seismic Safety Commission, and as Chair of the US National Research Council Committee on Hazard Mitigation Engineering and Board on Natural Disasters. He is a member of the Board of Directors of the non-profit World Seismic Safety Initiative (WSSI) which was created to support seismic safety actives under the International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction (IDNDR) and served as Co-Chair of the US Delegation for the closing of the International Decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Tsunami and Other Coastal Hazards Information Kit for the Caribbean Media
    Tsunami and Other Coastal Hazards Information Kit for the Caribbean Media Tsunami & Other Coastal Hazards Warning System Project ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Tsunami and Other Coastal Hazards Information Kit for the Caribbean Media was developed through the Tsunami and Other Coastal Hazards Warning System Project, which was implemented by the Caribbean Disaster Emergency Management Agency (CDEMA) [formerly CDERA] over the period 2007 ‐ 2010. The document was produced by The Seismic Research Centre, University of the West Indies (SRC, UWI). Special appreciation is extended to the Tsunami and Other Coastal Hazards Warning System Project Public Awareness and Education Technical Sub‐Committee and the UNESCO IOC International Tsunami Information Centre (ITIC). The development and publication of this Tsunami and Other Coastal Hazards Information Kit for the Caribbean Media have been made possible through the financial support of the United States Agency for International Development/ Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance (USAID/OFDA) and the in‐kind contributions from CDEMA Participating States. This activity is co‐funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the donor agencies supporting the activity or of CDEMA (formerly CDERA). © 2010 This document and any updates to it are available at www.cdema.org, www.weready.org and www.uwiseismic.com. Caribbean Disaster Emergency Management Agency (CDEMA) Building #1, Manor Lodge Complex Lodge Hill, St. Michael, Barbados, West Indies University of the West Indies Seismic Research Centre St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago United States Agency for International Development US Embassy Complex, Wildey Business Park Wildey, St.
    [Show full text]