DOCSLIB.ORG

NRRC Background, Objectives & Structure

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Summary NRRC Background, Objectives & Structure In February 2011, the Government of Nepal (GoN) launched the Nepal Risk Reduction Consortium (NRRC). The NRRC is a unique body that unites the GoN, the international financial institutions of the Asian Development Bank and World Bank, development partners and donors, the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, and the United Nations as members in the Steering Committee of the NRRC. The Government of India is a standing observer member of the Steering Committee. Partners of the NRRC who work to support the fulfilment of the five flagship programmes are located in Annex 8. NRRC Members Government of Nepal Embassy of Japan United Kingdom Department Asian Development Bank for International (ADB) Development (DFID) Australian Agency United Nations (UN): for International UNDP, UNISDR, UNOCHA Development (AusAID) and WHO Embassy of the Humanitarian Aid and Civil United States Protection Department of the European Commission (ECHO) World Bank/ GFDRR NEPAL RISK REDUCTION CONSORTIUM ii FLAGSHIP PROGRAMMES Nepal Risk Reduction Consortium Flagship Programme: 5 Year Budget (US millions)* Flagship Coordinator Government Lead Amount 1. School and Hospital Safety ADB & WHO Ministry of Education & Ministry 57.1 of Health and Population 2. Emergency Preparedness and UNOCHA Ministry of Home Affairs 55.2 Response Capacity 3. Flood Management in the Kosi World Bank Ministry of Irrigation 26.2 River Basin 4. Integrated Community Based IFRC Ministry of Federal Affairs and 44.3 Disaster Risk Reduction Local Development 5. Policy/Institutional Support for UNDP Ministry of Home Affairs 13 Disaster Risk Management Total 195.8 * This budget reflects the estimated amount required under each flagship and the funding that has been tracked in each flagship. We work to bridge the spectrum of activity of • Emergency preparedness and response development and humanitarian expertise, capacity supporting the GoN to implement a long • Flood management in the Kosi river term Disaster Risk Reduction Action Plan. basin The work of the NRRC builds on the National • Integrated community-based disaster Strategy for Disaster Risk Management risk reduction/management (NSDRM) which was approved in 2009. • Policy/Institutional support for disaster risk management Following the approval of the NSDRM and discussion by multi-stakeholder groups The estimated total budget of the five-year based on GoN priorities, five Flagship Flagship programmes is US $195.8 million.1 areas of immediate action for disaster risk management (DRM) in Nepal were In developing the programme, the priorities identified: outlined in the Hyogo Framework of Action • School and hospital safety 2005-2015, Building the Resilience of 1 The budget total reflects a 5 year time frame, whereas previous budgets were only 3 years. It also reflects the inclusion of critical priorities, such as airport readiness, where assessments had not been completed at the time when the original budget was developed. NEPAL RISK REDUCTION CONSORTIUM FLAGSHIP PROGRAMMES iii FLAGSHIP 1 on School and Hospital Safety FLAGSHIP 2 on Emergency Preparedness will improve the earthquake resistance of an and Response Capacity seeks to enhance ambitious number of these structures through the government’s response capabilities at retrofitting, operational strengthening, national, regional and district levels. This training and awareness-raising. A study of involves developing the ability to respond school earthquake safety revealed that of the in a coordinated manner with all in-country 900 buildings in 643 public schools surveyed resources, including the armed forces, and in the Kathmandu Valley, over 60% were‘at incoming international humanitarian and risk of collapse’ during a major earthquake military assistance. The programme will (NSET, GeoHazards International, 2000). A build upon on-going efforts to enhance similar structural assessment of hospitals and the capacity of Medical First Responders health institutions in the Kathmandu Valley (MFRs), collapsed structure search and (KV) stated that a major earthquake in the rescue (CSSR) and fire & emergency services KV would result in only 10% functionality of in order to create a sustainable response hospitals, with 30% partially functional and capability. Activities will also include 60% out of service (NSET, WHO-Nepal, 2003). a major effort in conducting disaster While the focus of this Flagship is on seismic preparedness workshops in all districts and resilience, it will also seek to promote risk- regions of Nepal to ensure an effective sensitive land-use planning, particularly in the emergency response to those affected KV and links to DRR work in schools and at by natural disasters and to guarantee the policy level which are conducted under other continuous operation of critical facilities. Flagships. These activities will involve consultation and agreement for implementation with all partners, especially with line ministries, the Nepal Army and Armed Police, Inter- Agency Standing Committee (IASC), partner Nations and Communities to Disasters (HFA), organisations and the donor community. and the Outcomes of the Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction 2009, which sets out specific targets for reducing losses from disasters, were taken into account. To date, more than 100 organisations and government entities are contributing to consortium work, including UN agencies, government departments, national and international NGOs. NEPAL RISK REDUCTION CONSORTIUM iv FLAGSHIP PROGRAMMES FLAGSHIP 3 on Flood Management in the Kosi River Basin has the specific priority of addressing the annual risk of floods in Nepal. Managing water-induced disasters, primarily floods, is a priority for the government and this Flagship has both short- and long-term goals. The short- term goals relate to improving flood management, while the longer-term goals are focused on implementing effective flood FLAGSHIP 4 on Integrated Community- mitigation measures, reducing economic Based Disaster Risk Reduction/ impacts due to floods, improving weather Management (CBDRR/M) seeks to capitalise and flood forecasting capabilities and on the activities and experience which strengthening flood warning dissemination has already accumulated to contribute to to communities. The Kosi River Basin is the a consistent, systematic and harmonized largest river basin in Nepal and when it approach to CBDRR/M at VDC level. floods it severely impacts communities in Flagship 4 members have developed a set Nepal as well as in Bihar, India. This Flagship of minimum characteristics for disaster- therefore focuses on the Kosi River Basin resilient communities and thereby adopted with a design strategy that includes both a minimum package of common elements structural and operational components to be included in all CBDRR/M projects. This aimed towards comprehensive disaster Flagship will complete CBDRR/M projects in management. 1,000 VDCs over a 5 year period. FLAGSHIP 5 on Policy/Institutional Support for Disaster Risk Management recognises that development and growth in Nepal are being done in a haphazard manner, thus creating new risks. In order to protect the investments made in development, the DRM capacity of the GoN should be enhanced both centrally and at the local level. This must include shifting the policy environment from a ‘relief’ oriented framework to a proactive and comprehensive risk reduction approach. In order to achieve this shift, FLAGSHIP 5 is supporting the GoN in mainstreaming DRM into development planning at the national and district levels and is working with municipalities to develop risk sensitive land use planning and strengthen the enforcement and compliance with building codes. This collective effort, which builds on the National Strategy for Disaster Risk Management, will save lives and protect Nepal’s gains in development. Contents Summary ...................................................................................................... i Contents ...................................................................................................... v Acronyms ..................................................................................................vii NRRC Background, Objectives and Structure ................................. 1 Background .................................................................................... 2 Objectives of the NRRC ............................................................... 6 Architecture and Membership of the NRRC ............................ 7 NRRC: Aligned with Global and National Priorities ............... 9 Flagship 1 – School and Hospital Safety Structural and Operational Aspects of Making Schools And Hospitals Earthquake Resilient .............................................................................11 Background to Flagship 1 ..........................................................12 Joint Programme Results and Implementation ...................15 Table 1.1: Joint Programme Results Budget - Schools .......23 Table 1.2: Joint Programme Results Budget - Hospitals ....24 Flagship 2 – Emergency Preparedness & Response Capacity ...27 Background to Flagship 2 ..........................................................28 Joint Programme Results and Implementation ...................30 Table 2.1: Joint Programme Results Budget ........................41 Flagship 3 – Flood Management in the Kosi River Basin ............45 Background to Flagship 3 ..........................................................46
Recommended publications
  • Download File

    Download File

    For non-commercial distribution only All photos used in this compendium were provided by the Knowledge Management Initiative (KMI) participants. The compendium is available in English and Russian. The electronic version of the compendium can be found at: www.preventionweb.net Hard copies are available at: UNISDR CA, 37/1 Bokhtar str, 6th floor, 734000, Dushanbe, Tajikistan. UNICEF RO CEE/CIS, Avenue de la Paix 5, 1202 Genève, Switzerland. Any comments and suggestions regarding the Compendium can be addressed to: Mr. Parviz Mahmudov, Education coordinator, UNISDR CA [email protected] Mr. Asim Rehman, Regional Emergency Preparedness and DRR Specialist, UNICEF CEE/CIS [email protected] Design: Zafar Mahmoudov, Advocacy and Communications Consultant, UNISDR CA Editor: Stephen Boyle The views expressed in this Compendium are those of the respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of ECHO, UNISDR and UNICEF. Acknowledgements The Compendium of Good Practices and Tools on Disaster Risk Reduction in Education in Central Asia has been developed as a result of the Knowledge Management Initiative, implemented by the United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction in Central Asia (UNISDR) and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) within the framework of the Disaster Preparedness Programme of the European Commission’s Humanitarian Aid Department (DIPECHO) and financed by ECHO. UNISDR and UNICEF express their gratitude to all participants who submitted examples of their experiences on disaster risk reduction in education: Mr. Timur Idrisov, NGO “Little Earth”, Tajikistan; Ms. Lyudmila Bakhareva, NGO “Man and elements”, Kazakhstan; Mr. Alexandr Kravchuk, UNDP Kazakhstan, Kazakhstan; Mr. Khusan Tursunov, NGO “HAYOT”, Uzbekistan; Ms.
  • World Bank Document

    World Bank Document

    Water Policy 15 (2013) 147–164 Public Disclosure Authorized Ten fundamental questions for water resources development in the Ganges: myths and realities Claudia Sadoffa,*, Nagaraja Rao Harshadeepa, Donald Blackmoreb, Xun Wuc, Anna O’Donnella, Marc Jeulandd, Sylvia Leee and Dale Whittingtonf aThe World Bank, Washington, USA *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] bIndependent consultant, Canberra, Australia cNational University of Singapore, Singapore dDuke University, Durham, USA Public Disclosure Authorized eSkoll Global Threats Fund, San Francisco, USA fUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Manchester Business School, Manchester, UK Abstract This paper summarizes the results of the Ganges Strategic Basin Assessment (SBA), a 3-year, multi-disciplinary effort undertaken by a World Bank team in cooperation with several leading regional research institutions in South Asia. It begins to fill a crucial knowledge gap, providing an initial integrated systems perspective on the major water resources planning issues facing the Ganges basin today, including some of the most important infrastructure options that have been proposed for future development. The SBA developed a set of hydrological and economic models for the Ganges system, using modern data sources and modelling techniques to assess the impact of existing and potential new hydraulic structures on flooding, hydropower, low flows, water quality and irrigation supplies at the basin scale. It also involved repeated exchanges with policy makers and opinion makers in the basin, during which perceptions of the basin Public Disclosure Authorized could be discussed and examined. The study’s findings highlight the scale and complexity of the Ganges basin. In par- ticular, they refute the broadly held view that upstream water storage, such as reservoirs in Nepal, can fully control basin- wide flooding.
  • River Culture in Nepal

    River Culture in Nepal

    Nepalese Culture Vol. XIV : 1-12, 2021 Central Department of NeHCA, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/nc.v14i0.35187 River Culture in Nepal Kamala Dahal- Ph.D Associate Professor, Patan Multipal Campus, T.U. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Most of the world civilizations are developed in the river basins. However, we do not have too big rivers in Nepal, though Nepalese culture is closely related with water and rivers. All the sacraments from birth to the death event in Nepalese society are related with river. Rivers and ponds are the living places of Nepali gods and goddesses. Jalkanya and Jaladevi are known as the goddesses of rivers. In the same way, most of the sacred places are located at the river banks in Nepal. Varahakshetra, Bishnupaduka, Devaghat, Triveni, Muktinath and other big Tirthas lay at the riverside. Most of the people of Nepal despose their death bodies in river banks. Death sacrement is also done in the tirthas of such localities. In this way, rivers of Nepal bear the great cultural value. Most of the sacramental, religious and cultural activities are done in such centers. Religious fairs and festivals are also organized in such a places. Therefore, river is the main centre of Nepalese culture. Key words: sacred, sacraments, purity, specialities, bath. Introduction The geography of any localities play an influencing role for the development of culture of a society. It affects a society directly and indirectly. In the beginning the nomads passed their lives for thousands of year in the jungle.
  • DIFFUSING SEISMIC SAFETY J. E. Rodgers1, V. Cedillos1, L. T

    DIFFUSING SEISMIC SAFETY J. E. Rodgers1, V. Cedillos1, L. T

    Proceedings of the 9th U.S. National and 10th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering Compte Rendu de la 9ième Conférence Nationale Américaine et 10ième Conférence Canadienne de Génie Parasismique July 25-29, 2010, Toronto, Ontario, Canada • Paper No 1604 DIFFUSING SEISMIC SAFETY J. E. Rodgers1, V. Cedillos1, L. T. Tobin2, B. E. Tucker3, and H. Kumar4 ABSTRACT Despite the efforts of the earthquake engineering and earth science communities, global earthquake risk continues to grow at a rapid rate. The increase in risk occurs primarily in the rapidly growing cities of the developing world, where engineering issues are often the most easily solved part of the problem. Earthquake resistant methods for building new structures and retrofitting existing ones are available. The challenges are for local people to understand that they are at risk from earthquakes and that risk should and can be managed, and to build the political support for the idea that all elements of society should pay for risk management activities. The theory of the diffusion of innovations, which is widely applied in other professions, provides the techniques to address these challenges. GeoHazards International (GHI) has developed a diffusion-based approach to introduce earthquake safety ideas and practices. The approach applies to both technical ideas and practices, such as performance-based earthquake engineering or specific retrofit methods, and to basic risk reduction measures that empower schoolchildren, their families, teachers, government officials, hospital personnel, and others to make themselves safer now. This paper presents examples from GHI’s projects in India, Pakistan, Indonesia and Nepal, and provides suggestions for enhancing the diffusion process in future earthquake safety projects.
  • Practical Science for Uncertain Futures Using Scenarios to Improve Resilience to Earthquakes John Young, Susan Njambi-Szlapka and Janise Rodgers November 2019

    Practical Science for Uncertain Futures Using Scenarios to Improve Resilience to Earthquakes John Young, Susan Njambi-Szlapka and Janise Rodgers November 2019

    Working paper 563 Practical science for uncertain futures Using scenarios to improve resilience to earthquakes John Young, Susan Njambi-Szlapka and Janise Rodgers November 2019 Earthquake disaster risk resilience is an example of a complex problem that requires decision- making and action from different stakeholders. These multiple stakeholders each have different and sometimes competing agendas, as well as different understandings of the nature of the problem. Abstract We outline here the use of transdisciplinary research and futures studies as methods for tackling this type of complex problem. These offer practical steps to bring together stakeholders and actors from different disciplines and different lay perspectives to (1) agree a common understanding of the problem, (2) think systematically about how these problems may play out in the future, and (3) come up with actionable, strategic plans that bring the results to fruition on the ground. Drawing on the theoretical literature about futures studies and transdisciplinary approaches, as well as lessons from various practical applications, we find that scenarios are among the most widely used transdisciplinary futures approaches. There are several approaches to scenario building, depending on the aims of the exercise and the availability of resources. In particular, we explore the Geohazards International approach, which has been used with great success in resource-constrained contexts. Readers are encouraged to reproduce material for their own publications, as long as they are not being sold commercially. ODI requests due acknowledgement and a copy of the publication. For online use, we ask readers to link to the original resource on the ODI website. The views presented in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of ODI or our partners.
  • Tsunami and Other Coastal Hazards Information Kit for the Caribbean Media

    Tsunami and Other Coastal Hazards Information Kit for the Caribbean Media

    Tsunami and Other Coastal Hazards Information Kit for the Caribbean Media Tsunami & Other Coastal Hazards Warning System Project ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Tsunami and Other Coastal Hazards Information Kit for the Caribbean Media was developed through the Tsunami and Other Coastal Hazards Warning System Project, which was implemented by the Caribbean Disaster Emergency Management Agency (CDEMA) [formerly CDERA] over the period 2007 - 2010. The document was produced by The Seismic Research Centre, University of the West Indies (SRC, UWI). Special appreciation is extended to the Tsunami and Other Coastal Hazards Warning System Project Public Awareness and Education Technical Sub-Committee and the UNESCO IOC International Tsunami Information Centre (ITIC). The development and publication of this Tsunami and Other Coastal Hazards Information Kit for the Caribbean Media have been made possible through the financial support of the United States Agency for International Development/ Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance (USAID/OFDA) and the in-kind contributions from CDEMA Participating States. This activity is co-funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the donor agencies supporting the activity or of CDEMA (formerly CDERA). © 2010 This document and any updates to it are available at www.cdema.org, www.weready.org and www.uwiseismic.com. Caribbean Disaster Emergency Management Agency (CDEMA) Building #1, Manor Lodge Complex Lodge Hill, St. Michael, Barbados, West Indies University of the West Indies Seismic Research Centre St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago United States Agency for International Development US Embassy Complex, Wildey Business Park Wildey, St.
  • A Case Study of the Kosi Flood 2008

    A Case Study of the Kosi Flood 2008

    SPECIAL ARTICLE Institutional Dysfunction and Challenges in Flood Control: A Case Study of the Kosi Flood 2008 Rashmi Kiran Shrestha, Rhodante Ahlers, Marloes Bakker, Joyeeta Gupta The Kosi flood disaster of 2008 in Bihar and also in Nepal he Kosi floods of 2008, caused by an embankment breach highlights two key issues relating to flood control. The at Kusaha village of Sunsari district in Nepal, was disas- trous. The embankments were built by India in 1959 as re- first is the failure of the structural approach to flood T quired by the 1954 Kosi treaty between Nepal and India. The control on the Kosi and the second is institutional treaty provided for construction of embankments in Nepalese dysfunction with respect to trans-boundary flood territory to control flooding both in Bihar state within India, and management. This article discusses the key reasons for a section of Nepal bordering with India. The recent floods raise two main issues: (1) Are the flood control measures appropriate the failure of flood management in the Kosi, through for the unique nature of the Kosi river? (2) To what extent can the stakeholder interviews and observations in the flood be attributed to the institutions managing the Kosi river? aftermath of the flood. The institutional context This is of critical importance if similar floods are to be prevented comprises several challenges such as trans-boundary and/or managed better in the future. The unique characteristics of the Kosi river and existing flood politics between Nepal and India, the internal politics of control measures have been extensively discussed by Dixit (2009) Nepal, intra-state politics in India, the inherent and Sinha (2008) and also by Kale (2008), Reddy et al (2008) weaknesses of the Kosi treaty, structural flood control and Gyawali (2008).1 However, although all authors refer to strategy and the lack of connection between the role of the institutions involved in the management of the Kosi river, not one analyses them.
  • Abbreviation and Acronyms

    Abbreviation and Acronyms

    Assessment of Hydropower Potential of Nepal Final Report Abbreviation and Acronyms AHEP : Available Gross Hydroelectricity Potential ASTER : Advance Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer AMF : Average Monthly Flow APHRODITE : Asian Precipitation Highly Resolved Observational Data Integration Towards Evaluation B : Breadth BCDP : Building Code Development Project B/C : Benefit-Cost Ratio BoQ : Bill of Quantities CAR : Catchment Area Ratio CCT : Central Churia Thrust CFRD : Concrete Faced Rock Fill Dam COD : Commercial Operation Date DCF : Discounted Cash Flow DEM : Digital Elevation Model DHM : Department of Hydrology & Meteorology DMG : Department of Mines & Geology DoED : Department of Electricity Development d/s : Downstream E : East EIA : Environmental Impact Assessment EMI : Equal Monthly Installment ESA : European Space Agency ESRI : Environmental System Research Institute EU-DEM : European Union Digital Elevation Model FDC : Flow Duration Curve WECS i Assessment of Hydropower Potential of Nepal Final Report GHEP : Gross Hydroelectricity Potential GIS : Geographic Information System GLOF : Glacial Lake Outburst Flood GoN : Government of Nepal GPS : Global Positioning System GWh : Giga Watt-Hour H : Height ha : Hectares HEC-HMS : Hydrologic Engineering Center-Hydrologic Modeling System HFL : High Flood Level HFT : Himalayan Frontal Thrust HPP : Hydropower Project HRU : Hydrological Response Unit ICOLD : International Commission on Large Dams ICIMOD : International Center for Integrated Mountain Development IDC : Interest
  • The Saptakoshi High Dam Project and Its Bio-Physical Consequences in the Arun River Basin: a Geographical Perspective

    The Saptakoshi High Dam Project and Its Bio-Physical Consequences in the Arun River Basin: a Geographical Perspective

    The Geographical Journal of Nepal Vol. 13: 167-184, 2020 Doi: http://doi.org/10.3126/gjn.v13i0.28157 Central Department of Geography, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal The Saptakoshi high dam project and its bio-physical consequences in the Arun river basin: A geographical perspective Dil Kumar Rai1 and Tika Ram Linkha2* 1Adaptation for Smallholders in Hilly Areas (ASHA) Project, Government of Nepal/IFAD 2 Dhankuta Multiple Campus, Dhankuta T.U., Nepal (*Corresponding Author: [email protected]) Received: 15 November 2019; Accepted: 05 January 2020; Published: March 2020 Abstract The big project called Saptakoshi high dam is a bilateral project of Indian and Nepalese government under the Koshi agreement. At present, high dam issue is being the great issue especially raising by the inhabitants of upstream in Koshi basin. Therefore, this research paper attempts to examine the bio-physical consequences due to high dam in the upstream of Arun river basin. Geographic Information System (GIS) and Remote Sensing (RS) technology have been used for the spatial analysis to prepare this paper. Spatial data have been taken from topographical map and Digital Elevation Model (DEM) and the attribute data have taken from Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), Kathmandu. It revealed that approximately 11777 hectors arable plain land will be inundated in Arun river basin only by water with river deposits due to high dam if the high dam will be built at the proposed place and proposed dam height. The proposed place lies 1.6 km upstream from Barahakshetra temple of Sunsari district and the dam height will 269 meters.
  • Schools Are Highly Vulnerable If Not Properly Constructed and Prepared for Earthquakes

    Schools Are Highly Vulnerable If Not Properly Constructed and Prepared for Earthquakes

    Safer Society NSET Report 2014 National Society for Earthquake Technology-Nepal (NSET) Cover Photo (Front) Students' Summit on Earthqauke Safety 2013, Sauraha, Chitwan Cover Photo (Back) Retrofitting of Adarsha L.S. School, Chiyabari, Ilam June 2014 Book Publication Series: NSET-097-2014 ©NSET ii | Safer Society NSET Report 2014 Message We are here again with the NSET Report 2014. This report presents an account of NSET's endeavors and activities towards the enhancement of disaster resilience of from the communities in Nepal during the past year. This year has been momentous in the sense that it marks 20 years of collaboration, commitment and partnering in disaster risk President management. NSET strongly believes that the earthquake resilience of communities can be achieved through enhancing awareness and building capacity by helping them to understand seismic risk and providing them with simple and practical methods in mitigating the risks. NSET is grateful that its work has been recognized with the wider acceptance of concepts, methodologies and safety measures NSET has been developing and propagating in Nepal and the region. On behalf of the NSET Executive Committee, I would like to thank all Government agencies, civil society organizations, international agencies and individuals for their Shiva Bahadur initiatives and partnerships with NSET in their Disaster Risk Management Programs. Pradhanang In conclusion, I would personally like to commend all the staff at NSET for their hard and dedicated work. With your continued and sustained efforts, I'm sure that NSET Vision of 'Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal by 2020' will materialize. Thank you! Safer Society | iii NSET Report 2014 Message Our National Society for Earthquake Technology -Nepal (NSET) has completed its 20 years of service to the nation and the region.
  • Beyond Hydropower: Towards an Integrated Solution for Water, Energy and Food Security in South Asia

    Beyond Hydropower: Towards an Integrated Solution for Water, Energy and Food Security in South Asia

    International Journal of Water Resources Development ISSN: 0790-0627 (Print) 1360-0648 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cijw20 Beyond hydropower: towards an integrated solution for water, energy and food security in South Asia Golam Rasul, Nilhari Neupane, Abid Hussain & Binaya Pasakhala To cite this article: Golam Rasul, Nilhari Neupane, Abid Hussain & Binaya Pasakhala (2019): Beyond hydropower: towards an integrated solution for water, energy and food security in South Asia, International Journal of Water Resources Development To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2019.1579705 © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Published online: 19 Mar 2019. Submit your article to this journal View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=cijw20 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2019.1579705 Beyond hydropower: towards an integrated solution for water, energy and food security in South Asia Golam Rasul, Nilhari Neupane, Abid Hussain and Binaya Pasakhala International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, Kathmandu, Nepal ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY South Asia is energy-poor, water-stressed, and food-deficient, and Received 31 August 2018 these problems are expected to intensify with high population Accepted 31 January 2019 growth, rapid economic growth and industrialization, urbanization, KEYWORDS and changing climate. Although the water, energy, and food security Water-energy-food nexus; challenges are interconnected, they are dealt with in isolation, which South Asia; Himalayan rivers; fails to address the challenge of trade-offsandexacerbatesthe hydropower; integrated river problems.
  • Disaster Risk Management in South Asia: a Regional Overview

    Disaster Risk Management in South Asia: a Regional Overview

    DISASTER RISK & CLIMATE CHANGE UNIT DSouth CAsia Region - World Bank The World Bank Group • South Asia Region Disaster Risk Management and Climate Change Unit • Sustainable Development Network December 2012 DISASTER RISK & CLIMATE CHANGE UNIT DSouth CAsia Region - World Bank Disaster Risk Management in South Asia: A Regional Overview The World Bank, 1818 H Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20433, U.S.A. Internet: www.worldbank.org All Rights Reserved Printed in Washington, DC First Printing: December, 2012 The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this book are entirely those of the authors and should not be attributed in any manner to the World Bank, to its affiliated organizations, or to members of its Board of Executive Directors or the countries they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. The boundaries, colors, denomina- tions, and other information shown on any map in this volume do not imply on the part of The World Bank Group any judgment on the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will promptly grant permission to reproduce portions of the work under normal circumstances. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, as well as all other queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, please send a request with complete details to the Office of the Publisher, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax: 202-522-2422; e-mail: [email protected].