Download This PDF File
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Brief of Minutes ACRL Board of Directors Meeting in Chicago ing areas and the other, non-Spanish speaking January 31, 1956 areas. Hotels at Miami Beach were discussed brief- Present were officers, directors and invited ly by Mr. Hamlin, who had just been to Flor- guests. President Vosper presided. ida (see "Notes from the ACRL Office" in the Julia Bennett reviewed the scope of the March issue). He reviewed ACRL policy for Postal Classification Bill. She hoped for favor- balanced conference of recreation, social con- able congressional action in the near future. tact, and intellectual fare. There was every The report of the Nominating Committee opportunity for recreation at Miami Beach was read (for nominees, see the list, with bio- without scheduled events. A proposed trip to graphical information, in the March issue of Cuba following the conference was described. C&RL). This had been approved the previous day at Mr. Hamlin reported the developments an informal meeting of ACRL officers on con- which led to the New York Times grant of ference arrangements. The Cuban tour had $5,000 to finance the purchase of the news- been cleared with ALA officers. Circles of In- paper's back file on microfilm by college li- formation could be comfortably accommo- braries. ACRL is to match this with a similar dated in the Hotel Seville. Two sessions on sum for the same purpose. About 26 applica- adjacent days were recommended. An ACRL tions for U. S. Steel grants last November had luncheon would be held after one of these ses- specified need for the New York Times on sions. Necessary business would be conducted microfilm, and he had presented this need to at the luncheon. It was voted that: officers of the Times. Mr. Thompson suggest- ed that similar proposals be made to other The Board of Directors endorse the plan leading newspapers. After brief discussion, it for a post-conference trip to Cuba, June was voted that: 23-25,1956. The Board of Directors accept the grant of Mr. Keyes Metcalf and Miss Lucile Morsch $5,000 from the New York Times for the were present on invitation of President Vos- purpose of placing back files of the Times per to take part in the discussion of the Steer- microfilm edition in college libraries. ing Committee Report on the Implementa- tion of the Management Survey for its rela- Mr. Hamlin was asked to review progress tionship to ACRL. Both are members of the with the College Reading Proposal, which steering committee. had been approved by the board at its last meeting. The ALA Executive Board had con- Mr. Vosper reviewed the favorable action sidered the proposal in November and ap- on the Management Survey at the last ALA proved it in principle. Suggestions for im- annual conference. This plan provided freer provement had been made. Mr. Swank, a opportunity for ALA groups to organize along member of the Executive Board, had hoped lines of interest and provided for closer ad- to rewrite it, but had only been able to turn ministrative control at ALA headquarters. in certain criticisms and suggestions for re- Any expression by the board on the steering vision. Mr. Hamlin expected to have a better committee report would be presented to the draft for Executive Board approval in the ACRL membership that evening. spring. As a preliminary to discussion, Mr. Logs- Mr. Vosper outlined plans for the ALA don was asked to give the ACRL field of in- General Session which is to be arranged by terest statement recently prepared at the re- ACRL and DCC. The scholarship of the Car- quest of the Steering Committee: ibbean area will be emphasized. One speaker In the organization pattern of the American Li- will be selected to represent Spanish speak- brary Association, the Association of College and 248 C( .LEGE AND RESEARCH LIBRARIES Reference Libraries wishes to represent those sity" or "College and Research" be desirable? libraries which support formal education above Mr. Parker suggested that ACRL's statis- the secondary school level or which provide tical activity might be carried on by a subcom- reference and research collections of significance. mittee of the over-all statistical committee. He It desires to carry on a program of activities to commended the dual focus of membership advance the standards of library services, in the and said that the type-of-library division should broadest sense, in these libraries, and the con- tinued professional and scholarly growth of in general represent librarians to the outside those engaged in work therein. world. The public is not interested in librar- ians as catalogers or reference workers. Miss Morsch reviewed recent changes in Mr. McAnally felt that the reorganization her committee's report and outlined the prin- would help to bring non-administrators to the cipal points, particularly the responsibilities fore in ALA. assigned to type-of-library associations. By "syn- Financial support of ACRL was discussed. thesis of the activities of all units within Both Miss Morsch and Mr. Mead stated that ALA" was meant responsibility for being a division as strong as ACRL would certainly aware of everything that was going on in the hold its own in the competition for support. type-of-work councils and to report on these Mr. Hamlin mentioned the long fight of to members. This was a watch-dog respon- college librarians to win financial support at sibility. Head librarians would have a par- ALA headquarters, as described in the Organ- ticular problem in keeping in touch with all ization Manual's historical article. Additional that goes on in the councils. They would use councils would involve more executive sec- the association to make sure that the councils retaries, more money spent on organization, provided for their needs. and less money spent on program. The pro- Discussion centered on ACRL's "operation ductiveness of the whole association might very of all programs that are in the exclusive in- well decrease. Mr. Mead felt that ALA should terest of the association or which have been aim to build its program more through mem- specifically assigned to it." Obviously, when bership participation than services of paid ACRL functions were transferred to councils, staff. its budget would be cut. Mr. Hamlin cited a At the request of President Vosper, Mr. number of specific operations now being car- Logsdon reread the field of interest statement ried on by ACRL. Certain of these were def- (above). It was voted that: initely assigned to councils. ACRL would con- tinue to have responsibility for a topic such The Board of Directors accept the field of as standards for college libraries, but would interest statement prepared by the ACRL draw on the councils for their information on Committee on the Implementation of the certain standards. Mr. Vosper stated that "in ALA Management Survey. a sense the councils would be on call as fact- finding organizations in general terms and It was voted that: the final development of building the educa- The Board of Directors endorse the report tional program in terms of the university li- of the ALA Steering Committee on the Im- brary would rest with ACRL." plementation of the Management Survey. Mr. Metcalf hoped that the reorganization would entail at least some economies in opera- Meeting in Chicago tion so that funds would be spent to better February 1, 1956 advantage. It was most important for ACRL to clear the decks of minor functions so that The meeting was attended by committee it could make good progress with important chairmen as well as officers, directors, council matters such as standards, improvement in members and a few guests. student reading habits, and fund raising. President Vosper called on Mr. Parker for Mr. Mead assured the directors that the the treasurer's report. The budget for the seeking of foundation money was a clear-cut year was reviewed. Expenditures for the first responsibility of ACRL. four months are normal. A possible change of name for ACRL was The delay in getting out the ACRL Organ- discussed. Would not "College and Univer- ization Manual was explained by Mr. Hamlin MAY, 1956 249 as caused by the resignation of Mrs. Spigel- store facilities prior to institutional visitation, man. Mr. Kraus was praised for editing the or otherwise use their influence to promote manual. bookstores which emphasize educational values. Mrs. Crosland, chairman of the Buildings Mr. Heintz described the Kenyon College Committee, outlined plans for a three-day bookstore which performs an important ed- buildings workshop at Georgia Tech prior to ucational function and makes money in a the Miami Beach Conference. A new book on very small community. buildings was needed. Mr. Dix reported relatively no activity for Mr. Hamlin reviewed efforts to work closer the Committee on Relationships with Learned with the American College Public Relations Societies. In this connection Mr. Vosper felt Association. Felix Reichmann had brought this that need existed for ACRL to coordinate its need up in a letter to Past-President Lyle. In work with that of learned societies and cer- this he stated that public relations is one of tain national educational groups such as the the library world's weakest spots. Much more American College Association. Mr. Dix felt attention should be given to good public rela- that educational associations would be glad tions. It was the wish of the Board to co- to cooperate on any important project. He operate with ACPRA, but no formal action suggested a committee to study cooperation. was felt necessary. Mr. Hamlin was requested to present his President Vosper praised the work of the resolution on the educational role of the col- Statistics Committee.