Comprehensive Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Comprehensive Report front cover_light box_volume black Comprehensive Report of the Special Advisor to the DCI on Iraq’s WMD With Addendums 30 September 2004 volume II of III Final Cut 8.5 X 11 with Full Bleed For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800: DC area (202)512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2250 Mail: Stop SSOP. Washington, DC 20402-00001 ISBN-13: 978-0-16-072488-6 / ISBN-10: 0-16-072488-0 (Vol. 1) ISBN-13: 978-0-16-072489-3 / ISBN-10: 0-16-072489-9 (Vol. 2) ISBN-13: 978-0-16-072490-9 / ISBN-10: 0-16-072490-2 (Vol. 3) ISBN-13: 978-0-16-072491-6 / ISBN-10: 0-16-072491-0 (Addendum) ISBN-13: 978-0-16-072492-3 / ISBN-10: 0-16-072492-9 (Set) Delivery Systems Still, I believe that the Arab nation has a right to ask: Delivery Systems thirty nine missiles? Who will fi re the Fortieth? Saddam Husayn This page intentionally left blank. Contents Key Findings............................................................................................................................................ 1 Evolution of Iraq’s Delivery Systems........................................................................................... 3 The Regime Strategy and WMD Timeline.......................................................................... 3 Ambition (1980-91) ............................................................................................................ 3 Decline (1991-96) ...............................................................................................................4 Recovery (1996-98)............................................................................................................. 5 Miscalculation (2002-2003) ................................................................................................ 7 Resolving the Retained Scud-Variant Missile Question .............................................................. 9 Liquid-Propellant Missile Developments .................................................................................... 9 Al Samud II ...................................................................................................................... 10 Al Samud Warhead ........................................................................................................... 14 Al Samud II Warhead ....................................................................................................... 16 Solid-Propellant Missile Developments .................................................................................... 17 Al Fat’h Missile Program ........................................................................................................... 17 Background ....................................................................................................................... 17 Delivery Systems General Characteristics ..................................................................................................... 18 Propulsion.......................................................................................................................... 18 Guidance and Control........................................................................................................ 19 Warhead............................................................................................................................. 21 Testing ............................................................................................................................... 25 Material Balance ............................................................................................................... 25 Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 28 Al ‘Ubur Missile Program ......................................................................................................... 28 Background ....................................................................................................................... 28 Propulsion.......................................................................................................................... 29 Guidance and Control........................................................................................................ 29 Warhead............................................................................................................................. 30 Testing ............................................................................................................................... 30 Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 30 Other Composite Solid-Propellant Systems ..................................................................... 30 Long-Range Ballistic Missile Projects ............................................................................. 31 Clustering SA-2/Volga Engines Designs ................................................................................... 31 SA-2 Conversions to Surface-to-Surface Missiles .................................................................... 35 Large-Diameter Solid-Propellant Missile Project ..................................................................... 35 Program Development ...................................................................................................... 35 i New Cruise Missile Projects ...................................................................................................... 37 HY-2 Range Extension ..................................................................................................... 37 Propulsion System ............................................................................................................ 39 Warhead ............................................................................................................................ 39 Guidance and Control ....................................................................................................... 39 Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 39 The Jinin [Jenin] Project ............................................................................................................ 39 Propulsion System ............................................................................................................ 40 Warhead ............................................................................................................................ 41 Guidance and Control ....................................................................................................... 41 Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 41 Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and Remotely Piloted Vehicles (RPVs)............................. 41 Brief History...................................................................................................................... 42 MiG-21 RPV ............................................................................................................................. 42 Background ....................................................................................................................... 42 Roles and Missions............................................................................................................ 44 L-29 RPV (Al Bay’ah) .............................................................................................................. 44 Background ....................................................................................................................... 44 Roles and Missions ........................................................................................................... 44 Huwaysh’s Accounting of the L-29 RPV Program .................................................................... 45 Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 46 Al Yamamah Project .................................................................................................................. 46 Background ....................................................................................................................... 46 Ibn-Firnas UAVs ........................................................................................................................ 47 Background ....................................................................................................................... 47 Characteristics ................................................................................................................... 47 Missions ............................................................................................................................ 48 Foreign Assistance............................................................................................................. 48 Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 51 Al Quds UAV Program .............................................................................................................. 52 Background ....................................................................................................................... 52 Characteristics ..................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Iraq and Weapons of Mass Destruction
    1/9/2017 Iraq and Weapons of Mass Destruction home | about | documents | news | publications | FOIA | research | internships | search | donate | mailing list Iraq and Weapons of Mass Destruction National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 80 Updated ­ February 11, 2004 Edited by Jeffrey Richelson Originally posted December 20, 2002 Previously updated February 26, 2003 Documents ­ Press release ­ Further reading Between Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in August 1990, and the commencement of military ac绳on in January 1991, then President George H.W. Bush raised the specter of the Iraqi pursuit of nuclear weapons as one jus绳fica绳on for taking decisive ac绳on against Iraq. In the then‐classified Na绳onal Security Direc绳ve 54, signed on January 15, 1991, authorizing the use of force to expel Iraq from Kuwait, he iden绳fied Iraqi use of weapons of mass destruc绳on (WMD) against allied forces as an ac绳on that would lead the U.S. to seek the removal of Saddam Hussein from power. (Note 1) In the aermath of Iraq's defeat, the U.S.‐led U.N. coali绳on was able to compel Iraq to agree to an inspec绳on and monitoring regime, intended to insure that Iraq dismantled its WMD programs and did not take ac绳ons to recons绳tute them. The means of implemen绳ng the relevant U.N. resolu绳ons was the Special Commission on Iraq (UNSCOM). That inspec绳on regime con绳nued un绳l December 16, 1998 ‐ although it involved interrup绳ons, confronta绳ons, and Iraqi aꬫempts at denial and decep绳on ‐ when UNSCOM withdrew from Iraq in the face of Iraqi refusal to cooperate, and harassment. Subsequent to George W. Bush's assump绳on of the presidency in January 2001, the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Postgraduate School
    NPS-97-06-003 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA SHIP ANTI BALLISTIC MISSILE RESPONSE (SABR) by LT Allen P. Johnson LT David C. Leiker LT Bryan Breeden ENS Parker Carlisle LT Willard Earl Duff ENS Michael Diersing LT Paul F. Fischer ENS Ryan Devlin LT Nathan Hornback ENS Christopher Glenn TDSI Students LT Chris Hoffmeister, USN LT John Kelly, USN LTC Tay Boon Chong, SAF LTC Yap Kwee Chye, SAF MAJ Phang Nyit Sing, SAF CPT Low Wee Meng, SAF CPT Ang Keng-ern, SAF CPT Ohad Berman, IDF Mr. Fann Chee Meng, DSTA, Singapore Mr. Chin Chee Kian, DSTA, Singapore Mr. Yeo Jiunn Wah, DSTA, Singapore June 2006 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Prepared for: Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Warfare Requirements and Programs (OPNAV N7), 2000 Navy Pentagon, Rm. 4E392, Washington, D.C. 20350-2000 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Winning the Salvo Competition Rebalancing America’S Air and Missile Defenses
    WINNING THE SALVO COMPETITION REBALANCING AMERICA’S AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSES MARK GUNZINGER BRYAN CLARK WINNING THE SALVO COMPETITION REBALANCING AMERICA’S AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSES MARK GUNZINGER BRYAN CLARK 2016 ABOUT THE CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND BUDGETARY ASSESSMENTS (CSBA) The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments is an independent, nonpartisan policy research institute established to promote innovative thinking and debate about national security strategy and investment options. CSBA’s analysis focuses on key questions related to existing and emerging threats to U.S. national security, and its goal is to enable policymakers to make informed decisions on matters of strategy, security policy, and resource allocation. ©2016 Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. All rights reserved. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Mark Gunzinger is a Senior Fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. Mr. Gunzinger has served as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Forces Transformation and Resources. A retired Air Force Colonel and Command Pilot, he joined the Office of the Secretary of Defense in 2004. Mark was appointed to the Senior Executive Service and served as Principal Director of the Department’s central staff for the 2005–2006 Quadrennial Defense Review. Following the QDR, he served as Director for Defense Transformation, Force Planning and Resources on the National Security Council staff. Mr. Gunzinger holds an M.S. in National Security Strategy from the National War College, a Master of Airpower Art and Science degree from the School of Advanced Air and Space Studies, a Master of Public Administration from Central Michigan University, and a B.S. in chemistry from the United States Air Force Academy.
    [Show full text]
  • Cranfield University
    CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY LEIGH MOODY SENSORS, SENSOR MEASUREMENT FUSION AND MISSILE TRAJECTORY OPTIMISATION COLLEGE OF DEFENCE TECHNOLOGY PhD THESIS CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF DEFENCE TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF AEROSPACE, POWER AND SENSORS PhD THESIS Academic Year 2002 - 2003 Leigh Moody Sensors, Measurement Fusion and Missile Trajectory Optimisation Supervisor: Professor B.A. White July 2003 Leigh Moody asserts his right to be identified as the author. © Cranfield University 2003 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of Cranfield University and without acknowledging that it may contain copyright material owned by MBDA UK Limited. i ii ABSTRACT When considering advances in “smart” weapons it is clear that air-launched systems have adopted an integrated approach to meet rigorous requirements, whereas air-defence systems have not. The demands on sensors, state observation, missile guidance, and simulation for air-defence is the subject of this research. Historical reviews for each topic, justification of favoured techniques and algorithms are provided, using a nomenclature developed to unify these disciplines. Sensors selected for their enduring impact on future systems are described and simulation models provided. Complex internal systems are reduced to simpler models capable of replicating dominant features, particularly those that adversely effect state observers. Of the state observer architectures considered, a distributed system comprising ground based target and own-missile tracking, data up-link, and on-board missile measurement and track fusion is the natural choice for air-defence. An IMM is used to process radar measurements, combining the estimates from filters with different target dynamics. The remote missile state observer combines up-linked target tracks and missile plots with IMU and seeker data to provide optimal guidance information.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Ballistic Missile Development in the DPRK
    Occasional Paper No. 2 A History of Ballistic Missile Development in the DPRK Joseph S. Bermudez Jr. Monitoring Proliferation Threats Project MONTEREY INSTITUTE CENTER FOR NONPROLIFERATION STUDIES OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES THE CENTER FOR NONPROLIFERATION STUDIES The Center for Nonproliferation Studies (CNS) at the Monterey Institute of International Studies (MIIS) is the largest non-governmental organization in the United States devoted exclusively to research and training on nonproliferation issues. Dr. William C. Potter is the director of CNS, which has a staff of more than 50 full- time personnel and 65 student research assistants, with offices in Monterey, CA; Washington, DC; and Almaty, Kazakhstan. The mission of CNS is to combat the spread of weapons of mass destruction by training the next generation of nonproliferation specialists and disseminating timely information and analysis. For more information on the projects and publications of CNS, contact: Center for Nonproliferation Studies Monterey Institute of International Studies 425 Van Buren Street Monterey, California 93940 USA Tel: 831.647.4154 Fax: 831.647.3519 E-mail: [email protected] Internet Web Site: http://cns.miis.edu CNS Publications Staff Editor Jeffrey W. Knopf Managing Editor Sarah J. Diehl Copyright © Joseph S. Bermudez Jr., 1999. OCCASIONAL PAPERS AVAILABLE FROM CNS: No. 1 Former Soviet Biological Weapons Facilities in Kazakhstan: Past, Present, and Future, by Gulbarshyn Bozheyeva, Yerlan Kunakbayev, and Dastan Yeleukenov, June 1999 No. 2 A History of Ballistic Missile Development in the DPRK, by Joseph S. Bermudez Jr., November 1999 No. 3 Nonproliferation Regimes at Risk, Michael Barletta and Amy Sands, eds., November 1999 Please contact: Managing Editor Center for Nonproliferation Studies Monterey Institute of International Studies 425 Van Buren Street Monterey, California 93940 USA Tel: 831.647.3596 Fax: 831.647.6534 A History of Ballistic Missile Development in the DPRK [Note: Page numbers given do not correctly match pages in this PDF version.] Contents Foreword ii by Timothy V.
    [Show full text]
  • Vector Control of an Induction Motor Based on a DSP
    Vector Control of an Induction Motor based on a DSP Master of Science Thesis QIAN CHENG LEI YUAN Department of Energy and Environment Division of Electric Power Engineering CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY G¨oteborg, Sweden 2011 Vector Control of an Induction Motor based on a DSP QIAN CHENG LEI YUAN Department of Energy and Environment Division of Electric Power Engineering CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY G¨oteborg, Sweden 2011 Vector Control of an Induction Motor based on a DSP QIAN CHENG LEI YUAN © QIAN CHENG LEI YUAN, 2011. Department of Energy and Environment Division of Electric Power Engineering Chalmers University of Technology SE–412 96 G¨oteborg Sweden Telephone +46 (0)31–772 1000 Chalmers Bibliotek, Reproservice G¨oteborg, Sweden 2011 Vector Control of an Induction Motor based on a DSP QIAN CHENG LEI YUAN Department of Energy and Environment Division of Electric Power Engineering Chalmers University of Technology Abstract In this thesis project, a vector control system for an induction motor is implemented on an evaluation board. By comparing the pros and cons of eight candidates of evaluation boards, the TMS320F28335 DSP Experimenter Kit is selected as the digital controller of the vector control system. Necessary peripheral and interface circuits are built for the signal measurement, the three-phase inverter control and the system protection. These circuits work appropriately except that the conditioning circuit for analog-to-digital con- version contains too much noise. At the stage of the control algorithm design, the designed vector control system is simulated in Matlab/Simulink with both S-function and Simulink blocks. The simulation results meet the design specifications well.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Controlling Ac Motor Using Arduino
    ABSTRACT CONTROLLING AC MOTOR USING ARDUINO MICROCONTROLLER Nithesh Reddy Nannuri, M.S. Department of Electrical Engineering Northern Illinois University, 2014 Donald S Zinger, Director Space vector modulation (SVM) is a technique used for generating alternating current waveforms to control pulse width modulation signals (PWM). It provides better results of PWM signals compared to other techniques. CORDIC algorithm calculates hyperbolic and trigonometric functions of sine, cosine, magnitude and phase using bit shift, addition and multiplication operations. This thesis implements SVM with Arduino microcontroller using CORDIC algorithm. This algorithm is used to calculate the PWM timing signals which are used to control the motor. Comparison of the time taken to calculate sinusoidal signal using Arduino and CORDIC algorithm was also done. NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY DEKALB, ILLINOIS DECEMBER 2014 CONTROLLING AC MOTOR USING ARDUINO MICROCONTROLLER BY NITHESH REDDY NANNURI ©2014 Nithesh Reddy Nannuri A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE MASTER OF SCIENCE DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING Thesis Director: Dr. Donald S Zinger ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Dr. Donald S. Zinger for his continuous support and guidance in this thesis work as well as throughout my graduate study. I would like to thank Dr. Martin Kocanda and Dr. Peng-Yung Woo for serving as members of my thesis committee. I would like to thank my family for their unconditional love, continuous support, enduring patience and inspiring words. Finally, I would like to thank my friends and everyone who has directly or indirectly helped me for their cooperation in completing the thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • RICHARD M. BISSELL JR. PAPERS SUBJECT SERIES 1935 – 1994; Boxes 1 - 12
    RICHARD M. BISSELL JR. PAPERS SUBJECT SERIES 1935 – 1994; Boxes 1 - 12 SERIES DESCRIPTION Alphabetical Subseries: Boxes 1 - 5 Alphabetical/Intelligence Subseries: Boxes 6 - 12 CONTENT This series contains an alphabetical listing of subjects pertaining to Richard M. Bissell Jr.’s personal and professional lives. Included herein are files documenting his childhood, his personal life, his career at the Institute for Defense Analysis (IDA), his career at the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), organizations to which he belonged, individuals with whom he had personal and professional relationships, and other topics. Document types include correspondence, interviews, memoranda, newspaper clippings, reports, magazine articles and notes. This series contains the bulk of the information in this collection regarding the Central Intelligence Agency to be found in this collection. Further information relating to the Central Intelligence Agency may be found in the Correspondence Series, the Historic and Oversize Papers Series, the Interviews Series, the Oral History Interviews Series. Document copies marked “Original filed for safekeeping” were created by Bissell’s office staff who then filed the originals in what is now the Historic Papers, Oversize Objects and Clippings Series of this collection. As was his apparent practice, many of Bissell’s notes in this series are written on the reverse of University of Hartford budget documents as well as on unused letterhead. STRUCTURE This series arrived at the library divided into two alphabetized subseries; a collection of alphabetized subject files relating to various facets of Richard M. Bissell’s personal and professional lives from childhood to retirement, and a collection of alphabetized files related to matters of intelligence and intelligence gathering.
    [Show full text]
  • A DSP Based Servo System Using Permanent Magnet Synchronous
    A DSP Based Servo System Using Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors PMSM Longya Xu, Minghua Fu, and Li Zhen The Ohio State University Department of Electrical Engineering 2015 Neil Avenue Columbus, OH 43210 Abstract- A digital servo system using a Digital Signal Pro cessor DSP is presented in this pap er. A Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor PMSM with rotor p osition enco der and Hall sensor is used. The eld oriented vector control technique is employed to achieve robust p erformance and fast torque resp onse. The system uses p osition and sp eed regulations as the system outer lo op, and the current regulation with vector control as the inner lo op. A DSP system using TI's TMS320C240 is develop ed, and the prop osed digital control strategy is implemented in the DSP. Key Words: Vector Control, Motion Control, Servo System, Digital Control, Permanent Mag- net Synchronous Motor PMSM, Digital Signal Pro cessor DSP I. Intro duction Precise motion control plays an imp ortant role in various areas such as automation industry, semiconductor industry, etc. Permanent magnet synchronous motors PMSM are ideal for advanced motion control systems for their p otentials of high eciency, high torque to current ratio, and low inertia. Advances in Digital Signal Pro cessors DSP have greatly enhanced the p otential of PMSM in servo applications. Digital control can b e implemented in the DSP, which makes it sup erior to analog based stepp er control, since the controller is much more compact, reliable, and exible. High p erformance of PMSM can be obtained by means of eld oriented vector control, which is only realizable in a digital based system.
    [Show full text]
  • Safe Havens in Syria: Missions and Requirements for an Air Campaign
    SSP Working Paper July 2012 Safe Havens in Syria: Missions and Requirements for an Air Campaign Brian T. Haggerty Security Studies Program Department of Political Science Massachusetts Institute of Technology [email protected] Copyright © July 15, 2012 by Brian T. Haggerty. This working paper is in draft form and intended for the purposes of discussion and comment. It may not be reproduced without permission of the copyright holder. Copies are available from the author at [email protected]. Thanks to Noel Anderson, Mark Bell, Christopher Clary, Owen Cote, Col. Phil Haun, USAF, Col. Lance A. Kildron, USAF, Barry Posen, Lt. Col. Karl Schloer, USAF, Sidharth Shah, Josh Itzkowitz Shifrinson, Alec Worsnop and members of MIT’s Strategic Use of Force Working Group for their comments and suggestions. All errors are my own. This is a working draft: comments and suggestions are welcome. Introduction Air power remains the arm of choice for Western policymakers contemplating humanitarian military intervention. Although the early 1990s witnessed ground forces deployed to northern Iraq, Somalia, and Haiti to protect civilians and ensure the provision of humanitarian aid, interveners soon embraced air power for humanitarian contingencies. In Bosnia, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s (NATO’s) success in combining air power with local ground forces to coerce the Serbs to the negotiating table at Dayton in 1995 suggested air power could help provide an effective response to humanitarian crises that minimized the risks of armed intervention.1 And though NATO’s
    [Show full text]
  • Policyfocus the Washington Institute for Near East Policy
    POLICYFOCUS THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY RESEARCH MEMORANDUM NUMBER FOURTEEN OCTOBER 1990 IRAQ'S ECONOMIC AND MILITARY VULNERABILITIES How VULNERABLE IS IRAQ'S ECONOMY ? How VULNERABLE IS IRAQ'S MILITARY? BY PATRICK CLAWSON BY W. SETH CARUS "Will sanctions against Iraq work?," is a Should diplomacy fail, the United States question too ambiguous to be useful. It leaves may be forced to fight a major war with Iraq to unasked such key problems as: What do we want free Kuwait and to provide for the long-term sanctions to accomplish? How would Iraq react security of Saudi Arabia and other allies in the if sanctions started to pinch? How much does region. Saddam Hussein care about what happens to Iraq's economy? If war breaks out, Iraq would be faced by a coalition of loosely allied military forces. Al- The reality is that a sanction-induced eco- though the United States is contributing the nomic crisis cannot be counted on to force largest and most powerful military contingent, it Saddam Hussein out of Kuwait, much less out of will be supplemented by units of varying degrees office. Sanctions are too unsure to hit the target of importance from a large number of other for them to be the sole arrow in the U.S. quiver. countries. In addition to the Saudi armed forces, Iraq has good prospects of surviving sanctions Argentina, Bangladesh, Canada, Egypt, France, through the end of 1991 by a combination of Morocco, Pakistan, Syria, and the United King- tightening consumers' belts plus loosening the dom have agreed to send combat formations.
    [Show full text]
  • Ballistic, Cruise Missile, and Missile Defense Systems: Trade and Significant Developments, June 1994-September 1994
    Missile Developments BALLISTIC, CRUISE MISSILE, AND MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS: TRADE AND SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS, JUNE 1994-SEPTEMBER 1994 RUSSIA WITH AFGHANISTAN AND AFGHANISTAN TAJIKISTAN AUSTRALIA 8/10/94 According to Russian military forces in Dushanbe, the 12th post of the Moscow INTERNAL DEVELOPMENTS border troops headquarters in Tajikistan is INTERNAL DEVELOPMENTS attacked by missiles fired from Afghan ter- 9/27/94 ritory. The Russians respond with suppres- 7/94 Rocket and mortar attacks leave 58 people sive fire on the missile launcher emplace- It is reported that Australia’s University of dead and 224 wounded in Kabul. Kabul ment; no casualties are reported. Queensland can produce a scramjet air- radio attributes this attack to factions op- Itar-Tass (Moscow), 8/11/94; in FBIS-SOV-94-155, breathing engine, which may offer payload posing President Burhanuddin Rabbani. 8/11/94, p. 36 (4564). and cost advantages over conventional SLVs. More than 100 rockets and mortar shells Chris Schacht, Australian (Sydney), 7/20/94, p. 6; are fired on residential areas of Kabul by 8/27/94 in FBIS-EAS-94-152, 8/8/94, pp. 89-90 (4405). anti-Rabbani militia under the control of During the early morning hours, Tajik Prime Minister Gulbuddin Hekmatyar and Mujaheedin launch several missiles at the 7/94 northern warlord General Abdul Rashid Russian Frontier Guard observation posi- It is reported that the Australian government Dostam. tion and post on the Turk Heights in awarded Australia’s AWA Defence Industries Wall Street Journal, 9/28/94, p. 1 (4333). Tajikistan. The missiles are launched from (AWADI) a $17 million contract to produce the area of the Afghan-Tajik border and from the Active Missile Decoy (AMD) system, a Afghan territory, according to the second “hovering rocket-propelled anti-ship missile commander of Russian border guards in decoy system” providing for ship defense against sea-skimming missiles.
    [Show full text]