Naval Postgraduate School
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
NPS-97-06-003 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA SHIP ANTI BALLISTIC MISSILE RESPONSE (SABR) by LT Allen P. Johnson LT David C. Leiker LT Bryan Breeden ENS Parker Carlisle LT Willard Earl Duff ENS Michael Diersing LT Paul F. Fischer ENS Ryan Devlin LT Nathan Hornback ENS Christopher Glenn TDSI Students LT Chris Hoffmeister, USN LT John Kelly, USN LTC Tay Boon Chong, SAF LTC Yap Kwee Chye, SAF MAJ Phang Nyit Sing, SAF CPT Low Wee Meng, SAF CPT Ang Keng-ern, SAF CPT Ohad Berman, IDF Mr. Fann Chee Meng, DSTA, Singapore Mr. Chin Chee Kian, DSTA, Singapore Mr. Yeo Jiunn Wah, DSTA, Singapore June 2006 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Prepared for: Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Warfare Requirements and Programs (OPNAV N7), 2000 Navy Pentagon, Rm. 4E392, Washington, D.C. 20350-2000 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED June 2006 Thesis Technical Report 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Ship Anti Ballistic Missile Response (SABR) 5. FUNDING NUMBERS 6. AUTHOR(S) LT Allen P. Johnson, USN, LT Bryan Breeden, USN, LT Willard Earl Duff, USN, LT Paul F. Fischer, USN, LT Nathan Hornback, USN, LT David C. Leiker, USN, ENS Parker Carlisle, USN, ENS Michael Diersing, USN, ENS Ryan Devlin, USN, ENS Christopher Glenn, USN; TDSI: LT Chris Hoffmeister, USN, LT John Kelly, USN, LTC Tay Boon Chong, SAF, LTC Yap Kwee Chye, SAF, MAJ Phang Nyit Sing, SAF, CPT Ang Keng-ern, SAF, CPT Low Wee Meng, SAF, CPT Ohad Berman, IDF, Mr. Fann Chee Meng, DSTA, Singapore, Mr. Chin Chee Kian, DSTA, Singapore, Mr. Yeo Jiunn Wah, DSTA, Singapore 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING Naval Postgraduate School ORGANIZATION REPORT Monterey, CA 93943-5000 NUMBER NPS-97-06-003 9. SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING / MONITORING Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Warfare Requirements and Programs AGENCY REPORT NUMBER (OPNAV N7), 2000 Navy Pentagon, Rm. 4E392, Washington, D.C. 20350-2000 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S. Government. 12a. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. A 13. ABSTRACT (maximum 200 words) Based on public law and Presidential mandate, ballistic missile defense development is a front-burner issue for homeland defense and the defense of U.S. and coalition forces abroad. Spearheaded by the Missile Defense Agency, an integrated ballistic missile defense system was initiated to create a layered defense composed of land-, air-, sea-, and space-based assets. The Ship Anti-Ballistic Response (SABR) Project is a systems engineering approach that suggests a conceptualized system solution to meet the needs of the sea portion of ballistic missile defense in the 2025-2030 timeframe. The system is a unique solution to the sea-based ballistic missile defense issue, combining the use of a railgun interceptor and a conformable aperture skin-of-the-ship radar system. 4. SUBJECT TERMS Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD), Collaborative Information Exchange (CIX), 15. NUMBER OF Automated Battle Management System (ABMS), Network Centric Warfare (NCW), Ship Anti- PAGES Ballistic Response (SABR), Systems Engineering (SE) 334 16. PRICE CODE 17. SECURITY 18. SECURITY 19. SECURITY 20. LIMITATION CLASSIFICATION OF CLASSIFICATION OF THIS CLASSIFICATION OF OF ABSTRACT REPORT PAGE ABSTRACT Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified UL i THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ii NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CA 93943-5001 COL David A. Smarsh, USAF Leonard A. Ferrari President Provost This report was prepared for the Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Warfare Requirements and Programs (OPNAV N7), 2000 Navy Pentagon, Rm. 4E392, Washington, D.C. 20350-2000. Reproduction of all or part of this report is not authorized without permission of the Naval Postgraduate School. This report was prepared by the Systems Engineering Analysis Cohort Nine (SEA-9) Ship Anti-Ballistic Response (SABR) team in conjunction with Temasek Defense Systems Institute (TDSI) SABR team members: LT ALLEN P. JOHNSON, USN LT DAVID C. LEIKER, USN LT BRYAN BREEDEN, USN ENS PARKER CARLISLE, USN LT WILLARD EARL DUFF, USN ENS MICHAEL DIERSING, USN LT PAUL F. FISCHER, USN ENS RYAN DEVLIN, USN LT NATHAN HORNBACK, USN ENS CHRISTOPHER GLENN, USN TDSI TDSI LT CHRIS HOFFMEISTER, USN LT JOHN KELLY, USN LTC TAY BOON CHONG, SAF LTC YAP KWEE CHYE, SAF MAJ PHANG NYIT SING, SAF CPT ANG KENG-ERN, SAF CPT LOW WEE MENG, SAF CPT OHAD BERMAN, IDF MR. FANN CHEE MENG, DSTA, SINGAPORE MR. CHIN CHEE KIAN, DSTA, SINGAPORE MR. YEO JIUNN WAH, DSTA, SINGAPORE Reviewed by: CLIFFORD WHITCOMB, Ph.D. ORIN MARVEL, Ph.D. SEA-9 Project Advisor SEA-9 Project Advisor WAYNE P. HUGHES, JR., CAPT, USN (Ret.) Released by: Chair, SEACC FRANK E. SHOUP, Ph.D. DAN C. BOGER, Ph.D. Director, Wayne E Meyer Institute of Interim Associate Provost and Dean of Research Systems Engineering iii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK iv ABSTRACT Based on public law and Presidential mandate, ballistic missile defense development is a front-burner issue for homeland defense and the defense of U.S. and coalition forces abroad. Spearheaded by the Missile Defense Agency, an integrated ballistic missile defense system was initiated to create a layered defense composed of land-, air-, sea-, and space-based assets. The Ship Anti-Ballistic Response (SABR) Project is a systems engineering approach that suggests a conceptualized system solution to meet the needs of the sea portion of ballistic missile defense in the 2025-2030 timeframe. The system is a unique solution to the sea-based ballistic missile defense issue, combining the use of a railgun interceptor1 and a conformable aperture skin-of-the- ship radar system. 1 Faculty Advisor’s Note: There are four major technical challenge areas associated with the transition of the railgun to the fleet. These are Barrel/Rail Life, Pulsed Power Management, Ship Integration, and Projectile Material and Guidance. Barrel/Rail Life addresses the issues associated with developing a material lining system which can withstand the repeated multiple launches required by the BMD mission. Pulsed Power Management encompasses the shipboard system required to store and deliver the significant amounts of pulsed power required for firing of the railgun. Ship Integration issues include all of the ship design requirements associated with the railgun including EMI/EMP effects and heat rejection. Projectile Material and Guidance addresses the significant challenges associated with Atmospheric heating and projectile guidance. Creating a railgun with the specific parameters in this report is not currently feasible given current technologies associated with the four major technical challenge areas, especially as they relate to system requirements for the firing rates, guidance, and top end projectile accelerations and velocities used in this study. Although the project parametric results examine alternate capabilities needed to meet the future threat, the study does not address the technological aspects of creating a physically feasible railgun to achieve the top end performance that would be needed to meet the worst case scenarios used in the study. Those aspects are addressed in more detail in a follow on study in the NPS Total Ship Systems Engineering (TSSE) program to be completed in December 2006. If these technological challenges are met in future developments, then the railgun implementation analysis used in this study can be used as part of the solution to the ballistic missile threat. v THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK vi TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1 1.1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................. 1 1.1.1 Project Motivation...................................................................................... 1 1.1.2 Project Assignment ..................................................................................... 2 1.1.3 Project Definition........................................................................................ 3 1.1.4 Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) Definition .............................................. 4 2.0 OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................ 7 2.1 SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (SE) PROCESS..................................................... 7 2.2 SHIP ANTI-BALLISTIC MISSILE RESPONSE (SABR) PROJECT SE APPROACH .....................................................................................................