DOCSLIB.ORG

Assessing Progress of Community Managed Gravity Flow Water Supply Systems Using Rapid Rural Apprasial in the Ikongo District, Madagascar

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Assessing Progress of Community Managed Gravity Flow Water Supply Systems Using Rapid Rural Apprasial in the Ikongo District, Madagascar ASSESSING PROGRESS OF COMMUNITY MANAGED GRAVITY FLOW WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS USING RAPID RURAL APPRASIAL IN THE IKONGO DISTRICT, MADAGASCAR By JONATHAN E. ANNIS A RESEARCH REPORT Submitted in Partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 2006 Copyright © Jonathan E. Annis 2006 This report “Assessing Progress of Community Managed Gravity Flow Water Supply Systems in the Ikongo District, Madagascar” is hereby approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. Civil and Environmental Engineering Master’s International Program Signatures: Report Advisor ______________________________ James R. Mihelcic Department Chair ______________________________ Neil J. Hutzler Date ______________________________ ii Preface Inspiration for this report came from the author’s experiences while serving as an Environment Peace Corps volunteer from 2003-2005 in rural Madagascar. After three months of training, I was placed in the rural village of Ikongo, spiritual home of the Antanala, a small ethnic group who lives in the southeastern part of the country. With support from the regional USAID projects, I was quickly integrated into ongoing development activities aimed at intensifying agriculture and improving public health in the region. Because of my background in environmental engineering, I developed a niche as a water and sanitation specialist providing support to multiple NGO’s working in the region. During my three years of service, I was involved in many projects including latrine building, handwashing promotion and the construction of six gravity flow water systems; providing potable water to a population of over 5,000. During this time, I was part a working environment with no regulatory oversight in which a group of men with little more than a hammer and a stamp could bid on (and sometimes win) projects in which they would be then responsible for the construction of gravity fed water supply systems in rural areas. These contractors had little regard for long term system sustainability. Due to budget constraints and shortsightedness when planning projects, little time was spent building community management capacity in villages that received water supply systems. It is in this framework that I write this report. This is my attempt to give a voice to all those who now live in villages with broken water systems partly because their system was built by a inept contractor or whose community was were never properly empowered to manage their system. Also, to plead with the thousands who wait indefinitely for the chance to taste clean water, that when their time comes we will be there to empower and support them. This report is submitted to complete my master’s degree in environmental engineering from the Master’s International Program in Civil and Environmental Engineering at Michigan Technological University. iii Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.......................................................................................................................... VI ABSTRACT VII LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................ VIII LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 CHAPTER 2 – INTRODUCTION INTO COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT OF RURAL WATER SUPPLIES...........................................................................................................................4 2.1 EVOLUTION OF COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT IN THE RURAL WATER DEVELOPMENT SECTOR ......4 2.2 COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF THIS STUDY .....................................................5 2.2.1 Community Dynamics.......................................................................................................vi 2.2.2 Ownership: Rules, Regulations and Enforcement...........................................................7 2.2.3 Operations and maintenance.............................................................................................8 2.2.4 Cost Recovery and Managing Finances within the community .....................................9 CHAPTER 3 - MADAGASCAR................................................................................................................11 3.1 DEMOGRAPHICS AND RURAL WATER STATISTICS.......................................................................11 3.2 GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE AND OTHER PROMINENT ACTORS INVOLVED IN IMPLEMENTING RURAL WATER SUPPLY..............................................................................................................13 3.3 LEGAL FRAMEWORK REGULATING RURAL WATER SUPPLY .......................................................14 3.4 COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT IN MADAGASCAR TODAY ..............................................................15 CHAPTER 4 – RESEARCH METHODOLOGY FOR EVALUATING PROGRESS OF COMMUNITY MANAGED GRAVITY FLOW WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS IN THE IKONGO DISTRICT, MADAGASCAR ..............................................................17 4.1 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................17 4.2 INTELLECTUAL FRAMEWORK OF PARTICIPATORY SOCIAL RESEARCH ........................................18 4.3 RAPID RURAL APPRAISAL (RRA) ...............................................................................................19 4.4 THE USE OF RRA TO STUDY PROGRESS OF GRAVITY FLOW WATER SYSTEMS IN THE IKONGO DISTRICT, MADAGASCAR ...........................................................................................................19 4.5 RESEARCH TEAM MEMBERS .......................................................................................................21 4.6 THEMES INVESTIGATED DURING RRA WORKSHOPS ...................................................................21 4.7 DESCRIPTION OF RRA TOOLS USED DURING WORKSHOPS .........................................................22 4.8 CONSTRAINTS OF THE STUDY......................................................................................................25 4.9 SITE SELECTION ..........................................................................................................................26 CHAPTER 5 RESULTS FROM THE 28 RAPID RURAL APPRAISAL COMMUNITY WORKSHOPS ORGANIZED PER THEME................................................................29 5.1 GEOGRAPHIC AND CULTURAL CONTEXT.....................................................................................29 5.2 COMMUNITY PROFILES ...............................................................................................................31 5.3 PHYSICAL FUNCTIONING OF GRAVITY FED WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS ........................................35 5.4 TYPICAL MAINTENANCE AND CLEANING AGREEMENTS...............................................................39 5.5 TECHNICAL CAPACITY; INCLUDING THE COMPETENCE OF LOCAL TECHNICIANS AND EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL SUPPLY OF SPARE PARTS...............................................................................................41 5.6 UNDERSTANDING EXISTING COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT AGREEMENTS....................................42 5.6.1 Pre-construction ...............................................................................................................42 5.6.2 Post-construction ..............................................................................................................43 5.7 UNDERSTAND EXISTING SYSTEMS OF FUNDS COLLECTION AND IDENTIFY CONSTRAINTS TO THE ADOPTION OF A RELIABLE METHOD OF FUNDS COLLECTION........................................................47 iv CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS..........................................................50 6.1 CONCLUSIONS.............................................................................................................................50 6.2 RECOMMENDATIONS...................................................................................................................53 REFERENCES 57 APPENDIX I - PROGRAM SCHEDULE AND CHECKLIST FOR RRA COMMUNITY WORKSHOPS ASSESSING PROGRESS OF COMMUNITY MANAGED GRAVITY FLOW WATER SYSTEMS IN THE IKONGO DISTRICT, MADAGASCAR...............................................................................................................59 APPENDIX II – EXAMPLES OF FLIP CHARTS FROM COMMUNITY WORKSHOPS SHOWING RRA TOOLS THAT WERE COMPLETED WITH COMMUNITIES:63 PARTICIPATORY MAPPING .................................................................................................................63 SEASONAL CALENDARS........................................................................................................................64 APPENDIX III – MAP CREATED USING ARC VIEW SOFTWARE SHOWING THE LOCATIONS OF ALL GRAVITY FLOW WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS IN THE IKONGO DISTRICT, MADAGASCAR AS OF FEBRUARY 2006. ..........................65 APPENDIX IV - OVERVIEW OF GRAVITY FLOW WATER SYSTEMS ........................................66 v Acknowledgments First, I would like to thank Jim Mihelcic and Tom Van Dam for their vision to start the Masters Internationalist program at Michigan Technological University that allows young engineers who question the many puzzling realities of our
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Description of 11 New Astiella (Spermacoceae, Rubiaceae) Species Endemic to Madagascar
    European Journal of Taxonomy 312: 1–40 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2017.312 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2017 · GROENINCKX I. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Research article Description of 11 new Astiella (Spermacoceae, Rubiaceae) species endemic to Madagascar Inge GROENINCKX 1, Steven JANSSENS 2, Erik SMETS 3 & Brecht VERSTRAETE 4,* 1 Plant Conservation and Population Biology, KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 31, P.O. Box 2435, 3001 Leuven, Belgium. 2 Botanic Garden Meise, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium. 3 Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands. 4 Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Sølvgade 83S, 1307 Copenhagen, Denmark. 1 Email: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] 3 Email: [email protected] * Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract. Astiella is an herbaceous genus endemic to Madagascar, originally described with a single species A. delicatula Jovet. Molecular and morphological evidence place it in the tribe Spermacoceae s. lat. of Rubiaceae. During herbarium studies and fieldwork in Madagascar, 11 new Astiella species were identified and these are described here: A. antongilensis Groeninckx sp. nov., A. antsalovansis Groeninckx sp. nov., A. confusa Groeninckx sp. nov., A. deblockiae Groeninckx sp. nov., A. desseinii Groeninckx sp. nov., A. homolleae Groeninckx sp. nov., A. latifolia Groeninckx sp. nov., A. longifimbria Groeninckx sp. nov., A. perrieri Groeninckx sp. nov., A. pulla Groeninckx sp. nov., and A. tsaratanensis Groeninckx sp. nov. The genus Astiella now holds 12 species in total that are all endemic to Madagascar.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Hydro Resource Mapping in Madagascar
    Public Disclosure Authorized Small Hydro Resource Mapping in Madagascar INCEPTION REPORT [ENGLISH VERSION] August 2014 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized This report was prepared by SHER Ingénieurs-Conseils s.a. in association with Mhylab, under contract to The World Bank. It is one of several outputs from the small hydro Renewable Energy Resource Mapping and Geospatial Planning [Project ID: P145350]. This activity is funded and supported by the Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP), a multi-donor trust fund administered by The World Bank, under a global initiative on Renewable Energy Resource Mapping. Further details on the initiative can be obtained from the ESMAP website. This document is an interim output from the above-mentioned project. Users are strongly advised to exercise caution when utilizing the information and data contained, as this has not been subject to full peer review. The final, validated, peer reviewed output from this project will be a Madagascar Small Hydro Atlas, which will be published once the project is completed. Copyright © 2014 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / THE WORLD BANK Washington DC 20433 Telephone: +1-202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org This work is a product of the consultants listed, and not of World Bank staff. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work and accept no responsibility for any consequence of their use.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Selected by the CITES Plants Committee Following Cop14
    PC19 Doc. 12.3 Annex 3 Review of Significant Trade: Species selected by the CITES Plants Committee following CoP14 CITES Project No. S-346 Prepared for the CITES Secretariat by United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre PC19 Doc. 12.3 UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road Cambridge CB3 0DL United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) 1223 277314 Fax: +44 (0) 1223 277136 Email: [email protected] Website: www.unep-wcmc.org ABOUT UNEP-WORLD CONSERVATION CITATION MONITORING CENTRE UNEP-WCMC (2010). Review of Significant Trade: The UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Species selected by the CITES Plants Committee Centre (UNEP-WCMC), based in Cambridge, following CoP14. UK, is the specialist biodiversity information and assessment centre of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), run PREPARED FOR cooperatively with WCMC, a UK charity. The CITES Secretariat, Geneva, Switzerland. Centre's mission is to evaluate and highlight the many values of biodiversity and put authoritative biodiversity knowledge at the DISCLAIMER centre of decision-making. Through the analysis The contents of this report do not necessarily and synthesis of global biodiversity knowledge reflect the views or policies of UNEP or the Centre provides authoritative, strategic and contributory organisations. The designations timely information for conventions, countries employed and the presentations do not imply and organisations to use in the development and the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on implementation of their policies and decisions. the part of UNEP or contributory organisations The UNEP-WCMC provides objective and concerning the legal status of any country, scientifically rigorous procedures and services. territory, city or area or its authority, or These include ecosystem assessments, support concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or for the implementation of environmental boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economics of Community Forest Management in Madagascar: Is There a Free Lunch? an Analysis of Transfert De Gestion
    7 The economics of community forest management in Madagascar: is there a free lunch? An analysis of Transfert de Gestion Neal J. Hockley & Mijasoa M. Andriamarovololona 5th June 2007 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Development Alternatives, Inc. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We gratefully acknowledge the support and assistance of Tom Erdmann, Mark Freudenberger, Vololoniaina Raharinomenjanahary, and Mamy Rakotondrazaka of ERI. They conceived this study and provided so much useful advice and information, and we hope that the report provides a useful analysis of Community-Based Natural Resource Management in general, and Madagascar’s policy of Transfert de Gestion in particular. The study relied upon the assistance willingly provided by the communities of Angalampona, Anjahamana, Antsatrana, Didy, Tsaratanana, and Vohidrazana. We hope that this report can improve the prospects for Transfert de Gestion in Madagascar, helping them to achieve their ambitions for their COBAs. Andrew Cooke helpfully provided information on RESOLVE’s review of Transfert de Gestion and Chris Holmes provided extremely useful information on WCS’s program for supporting COBAs around Makira, while Jonathan Annis helped with informative discussions of water systems. Finally, Tom Erdmann, Mark Freudenberger and Julia Jones, read the first draft of the report in full, and provided insightful comments that greatly improved it. We of course take full responsibility for any remaining faults. Misaotra indrindra The economics of community forest management in Madagascar: is there a free lunch? Neal J. Hockley & Mijasoa M. Andriamarovololona 1 Principal Consultant School of the Environment and Natural Resources, University of Wales, Bangor, Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • 626 Votants: 263 Blancs Et Nuls: 3 Suffrage Exprimes: 260
    RESULTAT LEGISLATIVES 27 MAI 2019 District: IFANADIANA Commune: AMBOHIMANGA SUD Code Bureau: 350101010101 AMBOHIMANGA SUD EPP AMBOHIMANGA SUD INSCRITS: 626 VOTANTS: 263 BLANCS ET NULS: 3 SUFFRAGE EXPRIMES: 260 N° Partie Voix Poucentage 1 IRD 123 47,31% 2 MAFI 6 2,31% 3 TIM 128 49,23% 4 INDEPENDANT RABEMIAFARA MANARINTSOA JOSÉ 3 1,15% Total des voix 260 RESULTAT LEGISLATIVES 27 MAI 2019 District: IFANADIANA Commune: AMBOHIMANGA SUD Code Bureau: 350101020101 SAHAMARANA EPP SAHAMARANA INSCRITS: 359 VOTANTS: 86 BLANCS ET NULS: 4 SUFFRAGE EXPRIMES: 82 N° Partie Voix Poucentage 1 IRD 51 62,20% 2 MAFI 3 3,66% 3 TIM 27 32,93% 4 INDEPENDANT RABEMIAFARA MANARINTSOA JOSÉ 1 1,22% Total des voix 82 RESULTAT LEGISLATIVES 27 MAI 2019 District: IFANADIANA Commune: AMBOHIMANGA SUD Code Bureau: 350101030101 MANDROALINA EPP MANDROALINA INSCRITS: 302 VOTANTS: 103 BLANCS ET NULS: 2 SUFFRAGE EXPRIMES: 101 N° Partie Voix Poucentage 1 IRD 71 70,30% 2 MAFI 1 0,99% 3 TIM 22 21,78% 4 INDEPENDANT RABEMIAFARA MANARINTSOA JOSÉ 7 6,93% Total des voix 101 RESULTAT LEGISLATIVES 27 MAI 2019 District: IFANADIANA Commune: AMBOHIMANGA SUD Code Bureau: 350101040101 AMBALAHERANA EPP AMBALAHERANA INSCRITS: 176 VOTANTS: 118 BLANCS ET NULS: 0 SUFFRAGE EXPRIMES: 118 N° Partie Voix Poucentage 1 IRD 87 73,73% 2 MAFI 1 0,85% 3 TIM 30 25,42% 4 INDEPENDANT RABEMIAFARA MANARINTSOA JOSÉ 0 0,00% Total des voix 118 RESULTAT LEGISLATIVES 27 MAI 2019 District: IFANADIANA Commune: AMBOHIMANGA SUD Code Bureau: 350101050101 AMBALAVARY EPP AMBALAVARY INSCRITS: 166 VOTANTS: 120 BLANCS ET NULS:
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Landscapes in Eastern Madagascar Environmental And
    Sustainable Landscapes in Eastern Madagascar Environmental and Social Management Plan Translation of the original French version 19 May 2016 (Updated 23 August 2016) 1 Table of Contents Acronyms ............................................................................................................................................... 7 Glossary ................................................................................................................................................. 9 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ 10 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 17 1.1 Background and Project Objectives ...................................................................................... 17 1.2 Objectives of the ESMP ........................................................................................................ 17 1.3 Link between the ESMP and the Environmental and Social Management Tools for the COFAV and CAZ Protected Areas ........................................................................................................ 18 2 Project Overview ......................................................................................................................... 20 2.1 Description of Components, Activities, and Relevant Sectors .............................................. 20 2.2 Targets and Characteristics
    [Show full text]
  • Le Developpement Economique De La Region Vatovavy Fitovinany
    UNIVERSITE D’ANTANANARIVO Année Universitaire : 2006-2007 Faculté de Droit, d’Economie, de Second Cycle – Promotion Sortante Gestion et de Sociologie Option : DEVELOPPEMENT DEPARTEMENT ECONOMIE « Promotion ANDRAINA » Mémoire de fin de Cycle LE DEVELOPPEMENT ECONOMIQUE DE LA REGION VATOVAVY FITOVINANY Encadré par : Monsieur Gédéon RAJAONSON Présenté par : MANIRISOA RAZAFIMARINTSARA Firmin Date de soutenance : 14 Décembre 2007 REMERCIEMENTS Pour commencer, je tiens à exprimer toute ma reconnaissance à tous ceux qui ont contribué, de près ou de loin, à ma formation et à la réalisation de ce Grand Mémoire de fin d’études en Economie. J’adresse donc tout particulièrement mes vifs remerciement à : • DIEU TOUT PUISSANT • Mon encadreur Monsieur Gédéon RAJAONSON ; • Tous les enseignants et les Personnels administratifs du Département Economie de la Faculté DEGS de l’Université d’Antananarivo ; • Monsieur Le Chef de Région de Vatovavy Fitovinany et ses équipes • Monsieur le Directeur Régional des Travaux Publics de Vatovavy Fitovinany • Ma famille pour leurs soutiens permanents. Veuillez accepter le témoignage de ma profonde gratitude. LISTE DES ABREVIATIONS ANGAP : Agence Nationale de la Gestion des Aires Protégés CEG : Collège d’Enseignement Général CHD 1 : Centre Hospitalier de District Niveau 1 CHD 2 : Centre Hospitalier de District Niveau 2 CISCO : Circonscription Scolaire CSB 1 : Centre de Santé de Base Niveau 1 CSB 2 : Centre de Santé de Base Niveau 2 DRDR : Direction Régionale du Développement Rural EPP : Ecole Primaire Public FCE : Fianarantsoa Côte Est FER : Fonds d’Entretien Routier FTM : Foibe Toantsritanin’i Madagasikara GU : Guichet Unique HIMO : Haute Intensité de Main d’œuvre INSTAT : Institut National de la Statistique M.A.E.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution De La Couverture De Forets Naturelles a Madagascar
    EVOLUTION DE LA COUVERTURE DE FORETS NATURELLES A MADAGASCAR 1990-2000-2005 mars 2009 La publication de ce document a été rendue possible grâce à un support financier du Peuple Americain à travers l’USAID (United States Agency for International Development). L’analyse de la déforestation pour les années 1990 et 2000 a été fournie par Conservation International. MINISTERE DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT, DES FORETS ET DU TOURISME Le présent document est un rapport du Ministère de l’Environnement, des Forêts et du Tourisme (MEFT) sur l’état de de l’évolution de la couverture forestière naturelle à Madagascar entre 1990, 2000, et 2005. Ce rapport a été préparé par Conservation International. Par ailleurs, les personnes suivantes (par ordre alphabétique) ont apporté leur aimable contribution pour sa rédaction: Andrew Keck, James MacKinnon, Norotiana Mananjean, Sahondra Rajoelina, Pierrot Rakotoniaina, Solofo Ralaimihoatra, Bruno Ramamonjisoa, Balisama Ramaroson, Andoniaina Rambeloson, Rija Ranaivosoa, Pierre Randriamantsoa, Andriambolantsoa Rasolohery, Minoniaina L. Razafindramanga et Marc Steininger. Le traitement des imageries satellitaires a été réalisé par Balisama Ramaroson, Minoniaina L. Razafindramanga, Pierre Randriamantsoa et Rija Ranaivosoa et les cartes ont été réalisées par Andriambolantsoa Rasolohery. La réalisation de ce travail a été rendu possible grâce a une aide financière de l’United States Agency for International Development (USAID) et mobilisé à travers le projet JariAla. En effet, ce projet géré par International Resources Group (IRG) fournit des appuis stratégiques et techniques au MEFT dans la gestion du secteur forestier. Ce rapport devra être cité comme : MEFT, USAID et CI, 2009. Evolution de la couverture de forêts naturelles à Madagascar, 1990- 2000-2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaominina Mendrika Before Final
    NOTES SUR LA MISE EN PRATIQUE DU CONCEPT NWHP « Application du concept « Nature – Richesse – Santé et Pouvoir » ou NWHP pour renforcer la mise à l’échelle de l’approche Commune Championne dans les Communes de la Région Fianarantsoa». Auteurs : Jean Solo Ratsisompatrarivo, Tom Erdmann, Suzanne Razanadravao 1- ABSTRACT Depuis 1998, les appuis du Programme Landscap Developpment Initiative (LDI), ont été surtout focalisés au niveau des associations Koloharena. Ils consistaient à renforcer la capacité technique et organisationnelle des paysans Koloharena à promouvoir les activités alternatives au Tavy et à améliorer les conditions de vie des membres. Depuis 2002, au temps de LDI, l’approche « Communauté Championne » a été promue en collaboration avec JSI, en partenariat avec MGHC (Malagasy Green and Healthy Communities) et Voahary Salama, avec financement fonds Packard. Cette approche soutient l’intégration “Population, Santé, Environnement au niveau des associations paysannes et a été menée dans 13 villages de l’ex Province Fianarantsoa en 2003 (rapport final LDI) . Si parmi les objectifs figure l’amélioration de la sécurité alimentaire, la préservation de l’environnement et la gestion rationnelle des ressources naturelles, la pratique et l’adoption du planning familial ; les actions ont été plus prépondérantes dans les domaines de la santé qui ont dégagés logiquement des résultats plus probants. « Kaominina Mendrika » est une approche faisant suite et amélioration à l’approche « Communauté Championne » considérant ainsi quatre composantes
    [Show full text]
  • Toerana Azo Antonina Amin'izany
    FAMPAHAFANTARANA Vaccinodrome manerana ny Nosy Ho antsika mpiara-miasa rehetra eto amin’ny Minisiteran’ny Toekarena sy ny Fitantanam-bola, izay maniry ny hanao na eto amin’ny faritra Analamanga na any amin’ny Faritra, dia omena antsika eto ireo toerana azo antonina amin’izany. Faritra Analamanga ATSINANANA TOAMASINA I CHUM TOAMASINA CSB Urbain AMBOHIDRATRIMO TOAMASINA II BSD TOAMASINA II CSB 2 Ivato Aeroport, CSB 2 Mahitsy, CSB 2 Antehiroka, CSB 2 CSB FANANDRANA Soavinimerina, CSB 2 Talatamaty, CSB 2 Ambohitrimanjaka, CSB FOULPOINTE CSB 2 Ambodirano, CSB 2 Ampangabe, CSB 2 Ambatolampy BRICKAVILLE CSB URBAIN BRICKAVILLE tsimahafotsy, CSB 2 Antanetibe Mahazaza, CSB 2 Anosiala. CHRD2 BRICKAVILLE MAHANORO CHRD MAHANORO ANTANANARIVO ATSIMONDRANO CSB U MAHANORO Hopitaly Itaosy, CSB 2 Andoharanofotsy, CSB 2 Ankadivoribe, CSB1 AMPITAKIHOSY CSB 2 Faliarivo, CSB 2 Itaosy Bemasoandro, CSB 2 Anosizato, VATOMANDRY BSD VATOMANDRY CSB 2 Itaosy Cité, CSB 2 Anjomakely, CSB 2 Tanjombato, CSB URBAIN VATOMANDRY CSB 2 Fenoarivo, CSB 2 Tsararivotra, CSB 2 Soavina, CSB 2 MAROLAMBO CHRD MAROLAMBO Ambohijafy, CSB 2 Ankaraobato, CSB 2 Ambohijanaka, CSB 2 CSB2 MAROLAMBO Ambaniala Itaosy. ANTANAMBAO MANAMPONTSY CHRD ANTANAMBAO MANAMPOTSY ANTANANARIVO AVARADRANO CSB 2 Anosiavaratra, CSB 2 Ankadikely, CSB 2 Ampahimanga, DIANA CSB 2 Masindray, CSB 2 Ambohimangakely, CSB 2 Alasora, ANTSIRANANA 1 CSBU TANAMBAO CSB 2 Sabotsy Namehana, CSB 2 Talata Volonondry, CSB 2 AMBILOBE CSB2 AMBILOBE Anjeva, CSB 2 Ankadinandrina, CSB 2 Ambohimanga Rova, CSB2 AMPONDRALAVA CSB 2 Ambohimalaza.
    [Show full text]
  • ASSEMBLEE NATIONALE Antenimieram-Pirenena
    ASSEMBLEE NATIONALE REPOBLIKAN'I MADAGASIKARA Antenimieram-pirenena Tanindrazana-Fahafahana-Fahamarinana LOI n° 97- 032 modifiant certaines dispositions de l'Annexe de la Loi n° 94-001 du 26 avril 1995 fixant le nombre, la délimitation, la dénomination et les Chefs-lieux des Collectivités Territoriales Décentralisées L'Assemblée Nationale a adopté en sa séance du 10 Octobre 1997, la loi dont la teneur suit : Article premier .- Les listes des Communes et les Fokontany composants, celles des Départements, des régions de Betsiboka, du Sofia, de l'Est, du Mangoro, du Sud-Ouest, du Vonizongo-Marovatana, du Horombe, de la Haute Matsiatra, du Nord, d'Analamanga, du Vatovavy, de l'Androy, du Bongolava, du Fitovinany, d'Ivon'Imerina, du Boeni, de l'Itasy, du Vakinankaratra, du Melaky, de l'Anosy, d'Atsinanana, d'Ambatosoa, de l'Alaotra sont respectivement modifiées par le tableau annexé à la présente loi. Article 2 .- Toutes dispositions antérieures et contraires à la présente loi sont et demeurent abrogées notamment celles prévues par l'annexe de la Loi n° 94-001 du 26 avril 1995 fixant le nombre, la délimitation, la dénomination et les chefs lieux des Collectivités Territoriales Décentralisées. Article 3 .- La présente loi sera publiée au Journal Officiel de la République. Elle sera exécutée comme loi de l'Etat. Antananarivo, le 10 octobre 1997 LE PRESIDENT DE L'ASSEMBLEE NATIONALE, LE SECRETAIRE, ANDRIAMANJATO Richard Mahitsison 2 ANNEXE DE LA LOI. n° 97-032 modifiant certaines dispositions de l'Annexe de la Loi n° 94-001 du 26 avril 1995 fixant
    [Show full text]
  • Article Lucien
    RAMIANDRISOA Lucien – Article 2016 Les chefs coutumiers ont-ils un rôle dans la gestion foncière ? L’exemple des sociétés Antemoro et Antañala, District de Manakara, Région de Vatovavy-Fitovinany, MADAGASCAR Par Lucien RAMIANDRISOA Doctorant en Géographie, Laboratoire Espaces et Sociétés École Doctorale Sciences Humaines et Sociales E-mail : [email protected] Université d’Antananarivo, MADAGASCAR Et En co-diretion de thèse avec le Laboratoire PACTE – Territoires, UMR 5194 CNRS – IEPG – UJF – UPMF Université Grenoble Alpes, FRANCE Résumé Abstract Les deux formalisations de droit de propriété à The two formulations of Malagasy property right Madagascar consistent dans l’immatriculation consist of land registration and land certification foncière et la certification foncière (selon la (according to the land reform of 2005). These two réforme foncière de 2005). Ces deux pratiques official and formal practices were put in place by officielles et formelles ont été instaurées par the Malagasy government since its independence l’État malgache depuis l’indépendance de 1960. 1960. Land management as a basis of “territorial La gestion foncière en tant que base de development” involves different decision makers “développement territorial” implique and will give a major opportunity for all l’intervention de diverses instances de décisions Malagasy farmers in formulation of property et va donner une grande opportunité pour tous les right. In Sub-Saharan African countries and even paysans malgaches dans le cadre de la in Madagascar, traditional leaders involve in the formalisation du droit de propriété. Dans les pays land management in which their decision-making de l’Afrique subsaharienne et même dans tout powers are limited by government.
    [Show full text]