DOCSLIB.ORG

195 216 End Notes 1/11/06 3:17 PM Page 195

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
195 216 End Notes 1/11/06 3:17 PM Page 195 195_216 End Notes 1/11/06 3:17 PM Page 195 END NOTES Foreword 1Undated document. Fred Myers. HSUS History and By-Laws, Filebox 3099-1245. Chapter One 1Robert Chenoweth, “The Humane Movement,” in HSUS, New Frontiers of the American Humane Movement (Wash- ington, D.C.: HSUS, 1960), 73. 2Jacques Sichel, The HSUS Handbook (Washington, D.C.: HSUS, 1969), 2a. 3Sichel, The HSUS Handbook, 2. 4Mrs. George F. Milliken, “The Record of The HSUS In Its First Five Years,” HSUS News (November 1959): 16; Jacques V. Sichel, “Fred Myers: Introduction and Homage,” undated speech, HSUS History and By-Laws Filebox 3099–1245; and Christine Stevens, “Laboratory Animal Welfare,” in Animal Welfare Institute, Animals and Their Legal Rights, 4th ed., (Washington, D.C.: AWI, 1990), 68. 5Milliken, “The Record of The HSUS In Its First Five Years”: 16; Sichel, “Fred Myers: Introduction and Homage”; Chris- tine Stevens, “Laboratory Animal Welfare,” 68; Ed Myers, personal communication (14 April 2003); and Marianne Myers Atkinson, interview (24 May 2003). 6William A. Swallow, The Quality of Mercy (Boston: Mary Mitchell Humane Fund, 1963), 165; and Sichel, The HSUS Handbook, 50. 7“We Confess to Being Jealous,” HSUS News (August 1957): 6; “Gandhi on Endowments,” HSUS News (September 1958): 8; HSUS, Annual Report of the President (Washington, D.C.: HSUS, 1958), 12; “ASPCA Urges More Monkeys in Missiles,” HSUS News (August 1959): 6; “President’s Address,” HSUS News (November 1959): 6; and Milliken, “The Record of The HSUS In Its First Five Years,” 16. 8John A. Hoyt, interview by Kim Stallwood, Archive (Baltimore, Md.: Animal Rights Network, 29 March 2001). 9Fred Myers, undated (1955) memo, “To Members of the National Humane Society,” HSUS History and By-Laws File- box 3099–1245; “Ex-Newsman Declares He Was Never a Red,” New York Herald-Tribune (16 March 1956); “Some Comments About Our Enemies,” HSUS News (May 1957): 3; and Belton P. Mouras, I Care About Animals: Moving from Emotion to Action (New York: A.S. Barnes, 1977), 122–123. 10“AHA Asks Court to Change NHS Name,” National Humane Society News (June 1956): 3; “Name of NHS Changed to The Humane Society of the United States,” National Humane Society News (January 1957): 1; and Milliken, “The Record of The HSUS In Its First Five Years,” 16. 11“Name of NHS Changed to The Humane Society of the United States,” National Humane Society News (January 1957): 1; HSUS News editorial (April 1962): 10; HSUS News editorial (September 1964): 3; and “HSUS Protests Issuance of Code Seal to Columbia Movie,” HSUS News (January 1966): 8. 12“Larry Andrews Resigns: Elected Director,” HSUS News (September 1956): 5. 13“Behind the Scenes,” HSUS News (March 1956): 5; “Campaign to Reduce Dog and Cat Breeding Pushed National- ly,” HSUS News (June 1956): 2; and Helen Jones, “Autobiographical Notes,” Between the Species 4, no. 1 (Winter 1988): 71. 14Sichel, The HSUS Handbook, vol. 2, 552; Patrick B. Parkes, personal communication (26 March 2003). 15“NCAWS Incorporated,” HSUS News (March 1959): 2; NCAWS entry, Anna Belle Morris Fund Ledger, Filebox 3099–1930; Jones, “Autobiographical Notes”: 71–74; and Patrick B. Parkes interview (13 March 2003). 16“Senate Committee Schedules April Slaughter Bill Hearing,” HSUS News (April 1956): 1. 17Fred Myers, undated document, 10, 1963, in “Fred Myers,” History and By-Laws, Filebox 3099–1245. 18Fred Myers, “Policing a Rodeo,” HSUS News (August 1957): 2; “Dog Warden Arrested,” HSUS News (June 1958): 8; and Ed Myers, personal communication (14 April 2003). 19Parkes, interview (13 March 2003); Patrick B. Parkes, personal communication to Ed Myers (17 April 2003). 20HSUS News (May 1957): 6. 21“NHS Inaugurates First Branch in Illinois,” National Humane Society News (March 1956): 1; Milliken, “The Record of The HSUS In Its First Five Years”: 16; Swallow, The Quality of Mercy, 165; and Patrick B. Parkes and Jacques V. Sichel, Twenty-Five Years of Growth and Achievement: The Humane Society of the United States, 1954–1979 (Washington, D.C.: HSUS, 1979), 7. Dallas Pratt described the way in which the New York HSUS chapter’s Virginia Milliken har- nessed his interest in the work in “The Long Way Round to the Animals,” Between the Species (Winter 1987): 48. 22Patrick B. Parkes, personal communication (23 March 2003). 23Ibid. 24Ibid. 25Ibid. 26Sichel, The HSUS Handbook, 70. 27“Alice Wagner, Former HSUS Director, Dies,” HSUS News (Summer 1977): 27; “William Kerber,” HSUS News (Summer 1990): 9; “Roger Caras Is Elected to HSUS National Board,” HSUS News (March 1970): 2; and Sue Pressman, “Amanda Blake,” HSUS News (Fall 1989): 5. 28“HSUS Director Jacques Sichel Dies,” HSUS News (Winter 1981): 7. 29Lee Edwards Benning, The Pet Profiteers: The Exploitation of Pet Owners—and Pets—in America (New York: Quad- 195 PROTECTING ALL ANIMALS: A FIFTY-YEAR HISTORY OF THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES 195_216 End Notes 1/11/06 3:17 PM Page 196 rangle, 1976), 41–42; “National Humane Leader Dies,” HSUS News (Spring 1978): 8; and Lois Stevenson, “Doc Thomsen Leaves a Legacy of Kindness,” Sunday Star-Ledger (30 April 1978). 30“International Humane Slaughter Law Sought Through U.N.,” HSUS News (January 1957): 4; “Lifetime of Humane Work Ends with Death of Miss Goode,” HSUS News (March 1970): 3; and Lynda Birke, “Supporting the Underdog: Feminism, Animal Rights, and Citizenship in the Work of Alice Morgan Wright and Edith Goode,” Women’s History Review 9, no. 4 (2000): 693–719. 31Fred Myers, memo to all HSUS directors (18 March 1960), History and By-Laws, Filebox 3099–1245; Parkes and Sichel, Twenty-Five Years, 4; and Fred Myers, “Report of the Executive Director,” in HSUS, New Frontiers of the American Humane Movement, 4–5. 32Parkes, interview (13 March 2003). 33Myers, memo to all HSUS directors (18 March 1960). 34Ibid.; Parkes and Sichel, Twenty-Five Years, 6. 35“Frank McMahon Loses Fight for Life,” HSUS News (Summer 1975): 6. 36“President’s Address,” HSUS News (November 1959): 5; Sichel, The HSUS Handbook, Vol. 2, 380. 37“National Leadership Conference Lays Plans,” HSUS News (November 1962): 1–2. 38Fred Myers to Mel Morse (9 August 1962); Fred Myers, undated memo (1963), 9, HSUS Filebox 3049–1245. 39Myers to Morse (9 August 1962); Edith Goode, memorandum to the Board of Directors (4 January 1965), HSUS Filebox 3049–1245; Parkes, interview (12 March 2003); and Marianne Myers Atkinson, interview (24 May 2003). 40“To All HSUS Members” (4 April 1963), HSUS Filebox 3049–1245; “HSUS Founder, Treasurer Dies,” HSUS News (Winter 1975–1976): 3. 41“Humanitarians Cautioned on Rash of Weak Lab Legislation; Urged to Support HSUS Bills,” HSUS News (Novem- ber 1964): 3. 42Parkes and Sichel, Twenty-Five Years, 20; Ben Hayes, interview (2 April 2003); Parkes, personal communication (26 April 2003). 43Dale Hylton, personal communication (29 May 2003). 44Ibid. 45“Board Resolution Wins Ballot, Amends By-Laws,” HSUS News (May 1966): 1. 46Myers to Morse (9 August 1962); “In Memoriam,” HSUS News (Summer 1988): 2. 47Sichel, “Fred Myers: Introduction and Homage,” 2; “John A. Hoyt Elected President of Humane Society of the United States,” HSUS News (March 1970): 2; and Hoyt, interview (29 March 2001). 48Parkes and Sichel, Twenty-Five Years, 26–27; Hoyt, interview (29 March 2001). 49Hoyt, interview (29 March 2001); Parkes, interview (13 March 2003). 50Hoyt, interview (29 March 2001); and John A. Hoyt, interview by Kim Stallwood, Archive (Baltimore, Md.: Animal Rights Network, 31 May 2001). 51See, for example, Report of the President for 1976 and 1992, HSUS History and By-Laws, Filebox 3099–1245. 52“Board Appoints New Committee to Study Long Range Problems,” HSUS News (October 1970): 2; Hoyt, interview (31 May 2001). 53“The World’s Greatest Humane Problem,” Report to Humanitarians 5 (September 1968): 1; President’s Report, 1978; Hoyt, interview (31 2001). 54Hoyt, interview (29 March 2001). 55Fred Myers, personal communication to Oliver Evans (19 August 1963), HSUS History and By-Laws, Filebox 3099–1245; “Announcement,” HSUS News (May–June 1968): 1; Mouras, I Care About Animals, 120; and Hoyt, interview (29 March 2001). 56John A. Hoyt, “Reflecting on Progress,” HSUS News (Winter 1973): 4. 57Washington Star (7 May 1971); John A. Hoyt, “New Occasions Teach New Duties,” HSUS News (July 1971): 5. 58John Hoyt, “Living Legacies,” HSUS News (Summer 1981). 59Hoyt, interview (29 March 2001); John C. MacFarlane, personal communication to John A. Hoyt (13 August 1973), Filebox 3099–315. 60Sichel, The HSUS Handbook, 4. 61Roderick Frazier Nash, The Rights of Nature: A History of Environmental Ethics (Madison, Wis.: University of Wis- consin Press, 1989), 60. 62http://www.nobel.se/peace/laureates/1952/schweitzer-lecture.html. Accessed June 2003. 63“Humanitarian of Year to Mrs. Flemming for Work with Children,” HSUS News (November 1964): 3. 64Sichel, The HSUS Handbook, 930. 65Nash, The Rights of Nature, 74–76. 66Joseph Wood Krutch, The Great Chain of Life (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1957), 165; “Two Books You Should Read,” HSUS News (May 1957): 4; HSUS News (March 1959): 1; and HSUS News (May 1959): 1. 67Joseph Wood Krutch, “What Does Violence Say About Man?” Saturday Review (27 March 1965). 68John A. Hoyt, memo to Board of Directors (12 February 1971, 1970–1974), Filebox 3099-1949; Richard Morris and Michael Fox, eds., On the Fifth Day (Washington, D.C.: Acropolis Books, 1978), 137. 69Oliver M. Evans, “A New Moral Imperative,” HSUS News (Winter 1976–77): 4–5; Patrick B. Parkes, “A Review,” HSUS News (Fall 1977): 1. 70Patrick Parkes, personal communication (7 April 2003). 71Sichel, The HSUS Handbook, 4a. 72John A. Hoyt, “A Policy Statement Regarding Various Animal Utilization Projects and Procedures” (14 April 1978), 2. 73“Education on TV,” HSUS News (November 1962): 1. 74“Laboratory Animals,” Report to Humanitarians 18 (December 1971): 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reading Animals Programme
    Reading Animals Programme Thursday 17th July 12-14:00 Registration (with coffee) 14:00- 14:30 Welcome 14:45- 16:00 Opening Plenary: Susan McHugh, Read Dead: Hunting, Genocide, and Extinction Stories 16:00-16:30 Coffee break and travel to session 16:30- 18:00 Session 1 18:00- 20:00 Wine reception and dinner buffet Friday 18th July 8-9 Coffee 9-10 Plenary Session: Kevin Hutchings 'More Savage than Bears or Wolves’: Animals, Romanticism, and the Transatlantic Indian Ten minutes for travel to session 10:10- 11:30 Session 2 11:45- 12:45 Session 3 12:45- 14:00 Lunch 14:00- 15:20 Session 4 15:30 – 16:30 Session 5 16:45- 18:00 Plenary Session: Diana Donald ‘Translated from the original equine’: Anna Sewell’s Black Beauty and the art of animal autobiography 18:00 Finish: delegates make own arrangements to eat Saturday 19th July 8-9 Coffee 9-10 Plenary Session: Tom Tyler The Spell of Anthropocentrism 10 minutes for travel to session 10:10-11:30 Session 6 11:45-12:45 Session 7 12:45- 14:15 Lunch 14:15- 15:45 Session 8 17:00 – 19:00 Plenary Session: Laura Brown and Cary Wolfe Nonhuman Subgenres: Animals and Innovation in Eighteenth-Century Literary Culture Wallace Stevens’s Birds 19:00- 22:00 Conference Dinner Sunday 20th July 8-9 Coffee 9- 10:30 Session 9 11:00- 13:00 Closing Plenary: Erica Fudge Farmyard Choreographies: Or, Reading Invisible Cows in Early Modern Culture 13:00- 14:30 Lunch and Close Keynote Speakers Opening Plenary: Thursday 17th July Susan McHugh, Read Dead: Hunting, Genocide, and Extinction Stories Several contemporary novels, including Linda Hogan’s People of the Whale (2009) and Robert Barclay’s Melal (2002), feature scenes of indigenous hunting of marine mammals gone spectacularly wrong: people are killed, animal deaths are unnecessarily prolonged, and all inhabit polluted landscapes.
    [Show full text]
  • 4​Th​ MINDING ANIMALS CONFERENCE CIUDAD DE
    th 4 ​ MINDING ANIMALS CONFERENCE ​ CIUDAD DE MÉXICO, 17 TO 24 JANUARY, 2018 SOCIAL PROGRAMME: ROYAL PEDREGAL HOTEL ACADEMIC PROGRAMME: NATIONAL AUTONOMOUS UNIVERSITY OF MEXICO Auditorio Alfonso Caso and Anexos de la Facultad de Derecho FINAL PROGRAMME (Online version linked to abstracts. Download PDF here) 1/47 All delegates please note: ​ 1. Presentation slots may have needed to be moved by the organisers, and may appear in a different place from that of the final printed programme. Please consult the schedule located in the Conference Programme upon arrival at the Conference for your presentation time. 2. Please note that presenters have to ensure the following times for presentation to allow for adequate time for questions from the floor and smooth transition of sessions. Delegates must not stray from their allocated 20 minutes. Further, delegates are welcome to move within sessions, therefore presenters MUST limit their talk to the allocated time. Therefore, Q&A will be AFTER each talk, and NOT at the end of the three presentations. Plenary and Invited Talks – 45 min. presentation and 15 min. discussion (Q&A). 3. For panels, each panellist must stick strictly to a 10 minute time frame, before discussion with the floor commences. 4. Note that co-authors may be presenting at the conference in place of, or with the main author. For all co-authors, delegates are advised to consult the Conference Abstracts link on the Minding Animals website. Use of the term et al is provided where there is more than two authors ​ ​ of an abstract. 5. Moderator notes will be available at all front desks in tutorial rooms, along with Time Sheets (5, 3 and 1 minute Left).
    [Show full text]
  • MFOA Newsletter 2015
    WINTER 2015 Perspective on the Movement Positions with MFOA Puppy Mill Legislation Pet Club Update Helping "Outside" Dogs State Cascade Fund Thank You Donors MFOA Volunteers 17 Read about MFOA's animal protection work over the last 17 years by clicking on Timeline at www.mfoa.net PERSPECTIVE The Moral Arc of the Universe By Robert Fisk, Jr. and Don Lopreino One truism about history is that much of it is forgotten. On August 20, 1920, the 19th Amendment to the Constitution, Nonetheless, history often becomes relevant to modern causes granting the women the right to vote, was signed, 72 years later. and concerns in ways we cannot always measure. Today we see that gay rights and legalization of marijuana During the mid-19th century, Frederick Douglass, William have reached the critical mass. They, like the animal rights Lloyd Garrison, Harriet Beecher Stowe, and Theodore Parker, an movement, experienced the same uneven progress, but the American minister of the Unitarian church, were household names pendulum of support is swinging our way, albeit much too slowly. and notable figures in the abolitionist movement. As noted animal advocate Kim Stallwood has written, there Parker lamented nothing came easy and there was virtually are five stages of social movements: public education, public policy, no discernible progress. Nonetheless, he remained optimistic and legislation, implementation and public acceptance. Gay rights and wrote: "Look at the facts of the world. You see a continual and marijuana are between stages four and five, animal protection is progressive triumph of the right. I do not pretend to understand probably somewhere between two and three.
    [Show full text]
  • Effective Advocacy: a Backgrounder
    EFFECTIVE ADVOCACY: A BACKGROUNDER Janice Cox World Animal Net CONTENTS 3 The Importance of Strategic Advocacy 3 What is Strategy? 3 Understanding Social Change 4 Taking into Account the External Environment 4 Effective Utilisation of Internal Resources 5 Understanding Stakeholders 5 Building a Movement that is a Powerful Force 5 To Be Truly Effective, Lasting Change, Not Superficial Change, is Necessary 6 Understanding Root Causes 6 Issue Choice 7 Conclusion Effective Advocacy: A Backgrounder 2 THE IMPORTANCE OF STRATEGIC ADVOCACY Advocacy is a strategy or process to bring about beneficial change in the policies and practice of influential institutions, groups and/ or individuals. There are strong reasons for developing advocacy work to progress animal welfare. These include the following: - Traditional practical/ rescue & emergency work alone are unlikely to produce sustained improvements in the lives of animals. - Advocacy can be used as a key tool for addressing the root causes of animal suffering. Advocacy does not merely deal with the symptoms of animal abuse and neglect, but ensures that the underlying educational, institutional and structural causes of suffering are addressed. - Advocacy is vital to ensuring that the authorities take responsibility for animal issues, including: policy, legislation and enforcement; education and awareness; research and training; and practical programs to improve the lives of animals. - Advocacy can change attitudes and political will. WAN believes it is vital to plan advocacy strategically in order to maximise its chance of success (and therefore its effectiveness). This means much more than just researching and selecting the best tactics to use. We believe that with effective strategies and actions ours holds the potential to be the next great social change movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Animal Law 2005.01.Pdf
    VOL. I 2005 JOURNAL OF ANIMAL LAW Michigan State University College of Law J O U R N A L O F A N I M A L L A W VOL. I 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION The Gathering Momentum…………………………………………………………………. 1 David Favre ARTICLES & ESSAYS Non-Economic Damages: Where does it get us and how do we get there? ……………….. 7 Sonia Waisman A new movement in tort law seeks to provide money damages to persons losing a companion animal. These non-compensatory damages are highly controversial, and spark a debate as to whether such awards are the best thing for the animals—or for the lawyers. Would a change in the property status of companion animals better solve this important and emotional legal question? Invented Cages: The Plight of Wild Animals in Captivity ………………………………... 23 Anuj Shah & Alyce Miller The rate of private possession of wild animals in the United States has escalated in recent years. Laws at the federal, state, and local levels remain woefully inadequate to the task of addressing the treatment and welfare of the animals themselves and many animals “slip through the cracks,” resulting in abuse, neglect, and often death. This article explores numerous facets of problems inherent in the private possession of exotic animals. The Recent Development of Portugese Law in the Field of Animal Rights ………………. 61 Professor Fernando Arajúo Portugal has had a long and bloody tradition of violence against animals, not the least of which includes Spanish-style bullfighting that has shown itself to be quite resistant to legal, cultural, and social reforms that would respect the right of animals to be free from suffering.
    [Show full text]
  • The Failure of the Three R's and the Future of Animal Experimentation
    University of Chicago Legal Forum Volume 2006 | Issue 1 Article 7 Reduce, Refine, Replace: The aiF lure of the Three R's and the Future of Animal Experimentation Darian M. Ibrahim [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf Recommended Citation Ibrahim, Darian M. () "Reduce, Refine, Replace: The aiF lure of the Three R's and the Future of Animal Experimentation," University of Chicago Legal Forum: Vol. 2006: Iss. 1, Article 7. Available at: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol2006/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Chicago Legal Forum by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Reduce, Refine, Replace: The Failure of the Three R's and the Future of Animal Experimentation DarianM Ibrahimt The debate in animal ethics is defined by those who advocate the regulation of animal use and those who advocate its aboli- tion.' The animal welfare approach, which focuses on regulating animal use, maintains that humans have an obligation to treat animals "humanely" but may use them for human purposes.2 The animal rights approach, which focuses on abolishing animal use, argues that animals have inherent moral value that is inconsis- tent with us treating them as property.3 The animal welfare approach is the dominant model of ani- mal advocacy in the United States.4 Animal experimentation provides a fertile ground for testing this model because a unique confluence of factors make experimentation appear susceptible to meaningful regulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Critical Perspectives on Animals in Society
    Proceedings of the Conference Critical Perspectives on Animals in Society held at the University of Exeter, UK 10 March 2012 © CPAS convenors, editors and individual named contributors, 2013 Some rights reserved Copyright in contributions to these proceedings rests with their respective authors. Copyright to the overall collection and arrangement and to any other material in this document rests with the convenors of CPAS and the editors of its proceedings. In the spirit of open-access publishing and with a commitment to the intellectual commons, reuse and distribution of these proceedings for non-commercial purposes is permitted and encouraged, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution± NonCommercial±NoDerivs 2.0 UK: England & Wales licence, which can be read at: creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/uk/ Amongst other things, this licence requires that you attribute material you reproduce to its author, and make clear to those you share it with that they too may reproduce it under the terms of the licence. Anything outside the licence, especially commercial use, requires the express permission of the editors and conference convenors, or of individual authors. Requests to the former should be directed to: [email protected] Edited by Chris Calvert and Jessica Gröling Contents Introduction by the editors 5 Chris Calvert and Jessica Gröling — Contributions in brief — About CPAS — Acknowledgements — Conference programme Campaigning techniques 11 Keynote address by Dr Richard D. Ryder Animal rights: moral crusade or social
    [Show full text]
  • Ethical and Political Approaches Anthology V8 WEBSITE VERSION
    Ethical and Political Approaches Anthology V8 Pre-publication draft. “Are We Smart Enough to Know When to Take the Political Turn for Animals?” Published in Ethical and Political Approaches to Nonhuman Animal Issues edited by Andrew Woodhall and Gabriel Garmendia da Trindade (Palgrave Macmillan; 2017) Kim Stallwood An advocate for animals who is an author and independent scholar and consultant [email protected] www.kimstallwood.com Author, Growl: Life Lessons, Hard Truths, and Bold Strategies from an Animal Advocate (Lantern Books; 2017) Kim Stallwood 1 Ethical and Political Approaches Anthology V8 Are We Smart Enough to Know When to Take the Political Turn for Animals? 1. Protests in the Primaries The 2016 presidential election in the United States had its share of street theatre, but not all was attributable to Donald Trump. Early on in the primaries, on March 30, three protestors from the animal rights organisation Direct Action Everywhere (DxE) interrupted US Senator and Democratic candidate Bernie Sanders while he spoke at a town hall meeting in Kenosha, Wisconsin.1 This was one of a small number of protests targeting Sanders by DxE. A YouTube video showed the protestors holding a banner declaring “Animal Liberation Now.” They shouted that Sanders once said, “The greatness of a nationI is measured by how it treats its most vulnerable,” but claimed that Sanders — who campaigned as a “Democratic socialist” — continued to “ignore the most vulnerable in our society,” meaning nonhuman animals. The protestors eventually were drowned out by the crowd’s hand-clapping and chanting of “Bernie! Bernie! Bernie!” From the stage, Sanders gestured for the protestors to sit down.
    [Show full text]
  • Wrenn Colostate 0053A 13455.Pdf
    DISSERTATION PROFESSIONALIZATION, FACTIONALISM, AND SOCIAL MOVEMENT SUCCESS: A CASE STUDY ON NONHUMAN ANIMAL RIGHTS MOBILIZATION Submitted by Corey Lee Wrenn Department of Sociology In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Spring 2016 Doctoral Committee: Advisor: Michael Carolan Lynn Hempel Michael Lacy Marcela Velasco Copyright by Corey Lee Wrenn 2016 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT PROFESSIONALIZATION, FACTIONALISM, AND SOCIAL MOVEMENT SUCCESS: A CASE STUDY ON NONHUMAN ANIMAL RIGHTS MOBILIZATION This project explores the intra-movement interactions between professionalized and radical factions in the social movement arena using a content analysis of movement literature produced by the Nonhuman Animal rights movement between 1980 and 2013. Professionalized factions with greater symbolic capital are positioned to monopolize claimsmaking, disempower competing factions, and replicate their privilege and legitimacy. Radical factions, argued to be important variables in a movement’s health, are thus marginalized, potentially to the detriment of movement success and the constituency for whom they advocate. Specifically, this study explores the role of professionalization in manipulating the tactics and goals of social movement organizations and how the impacts of professionalization may be aggravating factional boundaries. Boundary maintenance may prevent critical discourse within the movement, and it may also provoke the “mining” of radical claimsmaking for symbols that have begun to resonate within the movement and the public. Analysis demonstrates a number of important consequences to professionalization that appear to influence the direction of factional disputes, and ultimately, the shape of the movement. Results indicate some degree of factional fluidity, but professionalization does appear to be a dominant force on movement trajectories by concentrating power in the social change space.
    [Show full text]
  • Stallwood Collection Inventory Books.Numbers !1 of 33! Stallwood Collection Books 19/10/2013 Angell Geo
    Stallwood Collection Books 19/10/2013 Aberconway Christabel A Dictionary of Cat Lovers London Michael Joseph 1949 0718100131 Abram David The Spell of the Sensuous New York Vintage Books 1997 0679776397 Acampora Ralph Corporal Compassion: Animal ethics and philosophy of body Pittsburgh, PA University of Pittsburgh Press 2006 822942852 Acciarini Maria Chiara Animali: I loro diritti i nostri 'doveri Roma Nuova Iniziativa Editoriale SpA LibraryThing Achor Amy Blount Animal Rights: A Beginner's Guide Yellow Springs, WriteWare, Inc. 1992 0963186507 OH Achor Amy Blount Animal Rights: A Beginner's Guide Yellow Springs, WriteWare, Inc. 1996 0963186507 OH Ackerman Diane The Zookeeper’s Wife London Old Street Publishing 2008 9781905847464 Adams Carol J. The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical New York Continuum 1990 0826404553 Theory Adams Carol J. The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical New York Continuum 1991 0826404553 Theory Adams Carol J., ed. Ecofeminism and the Sacred New York Continuum 1993 0883448408 Adams Carol J. Neither Man Nor Beast: Feminism and the Defense of Animals New York Continuum 1994 0826408036 Adams Carol J. Neither Man Nor Beast: Feminism and the Defense of Animals New York Continuum 1995 0826408036 Adams Carol J. and Josephine Animals & Women: Feminist Theoretical Explorations Durham, NC Duke University Press 1995 0822316676 Donovan, eds. Adams Carol J. and Josephine Beyond Animal Rights: A Feminist Caring Ethic for the New York Continuum 1996 0826412599 Donovan, eds. Treatment of Animals Adams Bluford E Pluribus Barnum: The great showman & the making of the Minneapolis, MN University of Minnesota Press 1997 0816626316 U.S. popular culture Adams Carol J.
    [Show full text]
  • Anarchism and Animal Liberation
    Anarchism and Animal Liberation Anarchism and Animal Liberation Essays on Complementary Elements of Total Liberation Edited by Anthony J. Nocella II, Richard J. White and Erika Cudworth Forewords by David N. Pellow and John C. Alessio McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers Jefferson, North Carolina LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGUING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA Xxxxxx, Xxxxx, 19xx– Xxxxxxxx : xxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxx / Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-7864-9457-6 (softcover : acid free paper) ♾ ISBN 978-1-4766-2132-6 (ebook) 1. xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx—xxxx xxxxxxx BRITISH LIBRARY CATALOGUING DATA ARE AVAILABLE © 2015 Anthony J. Nocella II, Richard J. White and Erika Cudworth. All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying or recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Cover image: George Tsartsianidis/Thinkstock Printed in the United States of America McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers Box 611, Jefferson, North Carolina 28640 www.mcfarlandpub.com To all those who continue to struggle toward an anarchist society: a society of non- violence, compassion, respect and liberty for all animals, both human and nonhuman. We will always be indebted to those who have sacrificed their own freedom and futures by confronting those forms of oppression, domination and rule that bring immeasurable pain, misery and suffering into the world. Acknowledgments Anthony, Richard and Erika would like to thank everyone who assisted in the production and publish- ing of this book. Special mention must go to David N.
    [Show full text]
  • In Conversation with Sue
    IN CONVERSATION WITH SUE COE Sue Coe, one of the most committed activist artists in America, has during her thirty-five-year career charted an idiosyncratic course through an environment that is at best ambivalent toward art with overt socio-political content. Interview by Giovanni Aloi Sue Coe Man Followed by the Ghosts of His Meat, 1990. Photo-etching on white heavyweight Rives paper. Copyright ©1990 Sue Coe. Courtesy Galerie St. Etienne, New York © ecently, Anita Guerrini, Professor of The point of Animal Studies seems to be to advocate a Environmental Studies and History at University certain political point of view, and this influences the R of California stirred up a range of reactions in kinds of work that have appeared thus far. Is there response to a thread she launched on H-Animal (the room in Animal Studies for people who, say, think online-resource website for Animal Studies Scholars). eating meat is not wrong? Or that experimentation on Her question was: “does Animal Studies necessarily animals in some circumstances is somehow justified? As imply animal advocacy? someone who has written about animal 54 experimentation quite a lot, but who has not In the past, Newspaper and magazine editors unreservedly condemned it, I am not sure that I have a have restricted your freedom of expression place in Animal Studies as it is currently defined.” because of the overt and political content involved with your work. Do you have a story What is your take on this subject? that may not be yet published because deemed ‘too strong’? As one revolutionary in the times of South African apartheid stated “ I agree blacks and whites should co- Some time ago, I stopped negotiating for crumbs with exist, but first blacks have to actually exist.” People the mass media, and decided to publish my work in the have to do what they believe to be right – I am a vegan, form I intended, I can come up with my own dumb and am against all animal exploitation, and choose to be ideas, I do not need editors to tell me their dumb ideas.
    [Show full text]