DOCSLIB.ORG

Wrenn Colostate 0053A 13455.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wrenn Colostate 0053A 13455.Pdf DISSERTATION PROFESSIONALIZATION, FACTIONALISM, AND SOCIAL MOVEMENT SUCCESS: A CASE STUDY ON NONHUMAN ANIMAL RIGHTS MOBILIZATION Submitted by Corey Lee Wrenn Department of Sociology In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Spring 2016 Doctoral Committee: Advisor: Michael Carolan Lynn Hempel Michael Lacy Marcela Velasco Copyright by Corey Lee Wrenn 2016 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT PROFESSIONALIZATION, FACTIONALISM, AND SOCIAL MOVEMENT SUCCESS: A CASE STUDY ON NONHUMAN ANIMAL RIGHTS MOBILIZATION This project explores the intra-movement interactions between professionalized and radical factions in the social movement arena using a content analysis of movement literature produced by the Nonhuman Animal rights movement between 1980 and 2013. Professionalized factions with greater symbolic capital are positioned to monopolize claimsmaking, disempower competing factions, and replicate their privilege and legitimacy. Radical factions, argued to be important variables in a movement’s health, are thus marginalized, potentially to the detriment of movement success and the constituency for whom they advocate. Specifically, this study explores the role of professionalization in manipulating the tactics and goals of social movement organizations and how the impacts of professionalization may be aggravating factional boundaries. Boundary maintenance may prevent critical discourse within the movement, and it may also provoke the “mining” of radical claimsmaking for symbols that have begun to resonate within the movement and the public. Analysis demonstrates a number of important consequences to professionalization that appear to influence the direction of factional disputes, and ultimately, the shape of the movement. Results indicate some degree of factional fluidity, but professionalization does appear to be a dominant force on movement trajectories by concentrating power in the social change space. Professionalization appears to provoke the mobilization of radical factions, but it also provides organizations that professionalize the mechanisms for controlling and marginalizing radical competitors. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I enjoyed the assistance from many respected vegan colleagues in the construction of this project. Thanks to Dr. Kate Stewart of the University of Nottingham for her encouragement and assistance with choosing and operating qualitative content analysis programs, and Dr. Matthew Cole of the Open University for his assistance in locating historical content on the Vegan Society. Thanks also to Dr. David Nibert for his mentorship and to Dr. Tom Regan, Carol J. Adams, Kim Stallwood, and Dr. Michael Lundblad for their support and help illuminating the history of Nonhuman Animal rights mobilization and suggesting helpful sources. Thanks to Gweyneth Thayer, Associate Head and Curator of Special Collections at North Carolina State University, for her assistance at the Tom Regan Animal Rights Archives, Kathie Clarke of Dabney S. Lancaster Community College for her help locating relevant books, James Aherne and Rhiannon Sims for their assistance in tracking down units for analysis, and Sarah K. Woodcock for mulling over the findings with me in many spirited late-night conversations. My feline companion Keeley should also be acknowledged, as he also offered his supervision and support throughout the writing process. I am grateful to my friends and colleagues for their support and encouragement. The doctoral journey is an arduous one that is especially challenging for women of disadvantaged backgrounds. The friendship of Soren Nelson, Cheryl Abbate, Katie Koczynski Demong, Rebecca Rhodes, Rhiannon Sims, and others helped me navigate my difficult graduate career, especially, my mother, who really made it all possible. Finally, I wish to thank my amazing dissertation committee for their guidance, wisdom, and patience. Without these folks, it is unlikely I would have succeeded. iii Part of this dissertation research was funded by a VegFund merit award, and part of this dissertation was composed at the Shin Pond Summer Retreat Program hosted by the Humane Society of the United States in Shin Pond, Maine. iv DEDICATION For Soren v TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................... iii DEDICATION ................................................................................................................................ v LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................... viii LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................... ix CHAPTER ONE | INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 1 Professionalization and Symbolic Capital .................................................................................. 4 Radical Factions and Marginalization ........................................................................................ 7 CHAPTER TWO | LITERATURE REVIEW .............................................................................. 16 The Nonhuman Animal Rights Movement ............................................................................... 16 Micro-level Structures: Individual Participation ...................................................................... 23 Meso-Level Structures: Social Movement Agency .................................................................. 28 Macro-Level Structures: The Social Movement Environment ................................................. 32 The Role of Factionalism .......................................................................................................... 37 Summary ................................................................................................................................... 41 CHAPTER THREE | METHODOLOGY .................................................................................... 43 Data ........................................................................................................................................... 50 Study Design ............................................................................................................................. 55 Strengths and Weaknesses in QCA ..................................................................................................... 55 Strengthening Reliability and Validity ............................................................................................... 57 Units of Analysis and Coding Scheme ............................................................................................... 59 Ethical Considerations .............................................................................................................. 66 Concluding Rationale................................................................................................................ 68 CHAPTER FOUR | FACTIONALISM BEFORE THE NON-PROFIT INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX ................................................................................................................................... 70 For the Prevention of Cruelty ................................................................................................... 71 Vivisection Dissects the Movement.......................................................................................... 73 Vegans Leave the Half-Way House .......................................................................................... 75 The Vegan Feminist Mystique .................................................................................................. 76 CHAPTER FIVE | MOVEMENT CHARACTERISTICS PRIOR TO PROFESSIONALIZATION ......................................................................................................... 81 Embracing Direct Action .......................................................................................................... 81 Democratic Structure ................................................................................................................ 83 vi CHAPTER SIX | THE RISE OF PROFESSIONALIZATION .................................................... 87 The March for the Animals ....................................................................................................... 87 Splitting Up Down Under ......................................................................................................... 91 From Abolition to Compassion ................................................................................................. 96 CHAPTER SEVEN | A TYPOLOGY OF PROFESSIONALIZATION ................................... 102 All’s Quiet on the Professionalized Front ............................................................................... 103 Cooperation and Competition ................................................................................................. 106 Moderating the Movement ...................................................................................................... 112 Financing the Movement ........................................................................................................ 122 CHAPTER EIGHT | PROFESSIONALIZED ORGANIZATIONS AND BOUNDARY MAINTENANCE ......................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • World Veg Festival 2009
    WORLD VEG FESTIVAL 2010 Sponsored by The San Francisco Vegetarian Society By Dixie Mahy, President of SFVS & Coordinator for WVF The 11th annual WORLD VEG FESTIVAL October 2 & 3, 2010 presented in the San Francisco County Fair Building, in Golden Gate Park, San Francisco was another great success with around 6,500 attendees over the two-day weekend. We continue to present the most exciting festival in the Bay Area and perhaps California. The purpose of the event is to celebrate and to educate. We celebrated with entertainment and we educated with 24 speakers & 1 yoga teacher, 12 demo presenters (raw & cooked), 8 food booths, 32 exhibitors, 17 non-profits, and 3 speakers’ tables! Our celebration included a Children’s Corner; Vegan Speed Dating moderated by Kristen Miles; a fun Vegan Fashion Show presented by Karine Brighten Events; a Teen Forum moderated by Nora Kramer; Music, Dancing, & Acrobatics in the Gallery; and a gala dinner Saturday evening with Raw or Cooked vegan choices. Organizing Committee & Volunteers This fabulous event could not have occurred without the Organizing Committee preparing, publicizing, and presenting the event. Many volunteer hours were given by our dedicated committee which included: Officers: Dixie Mahy, SFVS President & WVF Coordinator; JC, SFVS Treasurer & WVF Exhibitor & Printed Program Coordinator, Nancy Loewen, SFVS Vice President, Janet Tom SFVS Secretary, and Board Members who were on the committee: Sharon Leong, Joyce Thornton, Tom Flynn, and Vasu Marti. Other volunteer committee members included: Helen Leroy-Adler, Sample Coordinator; Father River Sims, e-mail Publicity Coordinator; Deborah Fox, Volunteer Coordinator, and Carmen Lee, Committee Member.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Animals Programme
    Reading Animals Programme Thursday 17th July 12-14:00 Registration (with coffee) 14:00- 14:30 Welcome 14:45- 16:00 Opening Plenary: Susan McHugh, Read Dead: Hunting, Genocide, and Extinction Stories 16:00-16:30 Coffee break and travel to session 16:30- 18:00 Session 1 18:00- 20:00 Wine reception and dinner buffet Friday 18th July 8-9 Coffee 9-10 Plenary Session: Kevin Hutchings 'More Savage than Bears or Wolves’: Animals, Romanticism, and the Transatlantic Indian Ten minutes for travel to session 10:10- 11:30 Session 2 11:45- 12:45 Session 3 12:45- 14:00 Lunch 14:00- 15:20 Session 4 15:30 – 16:30 Session 5 16:45- 18:00 Plenary Session: Diana Donald ‘Translated from the original equine’: Anna Sewell’s Black Beauty and the art of animal autobiography 18:00 Finish: delegates make own arrangements to eat Saturday 19th July 8-9 Coffee 9-10 Plenary Session: Tom Tyler The Spell of Anthropocentrism 10 minutes for travel to session 10:10-11:30 Session 6 11:45-12:45 Session 7 12:45- 14:15 Lunch 14:15- 15:45 Session 8 17:00 – 19:00 Plenary Session: Laura Brown and Cary Wolfe Nonhuman Subgenres: Animals and Innovation in Eighteenth-Century Literary Culture Wallace Stevens’s Birds 19:00- 22:00 Conference Dinner Sunday 20th July 8-9 Coffee 9- 10:30 Session 9 11:00- 13:00 Closing Plenary: Erica Fudge Farmyard Choreographies: Or, Reading Invisible Cows in Early Modern Culture 13:00- 14:30 Lunch and Close Keynote Speakers Opening Plenary: Thursday 17th July Susan McHugh, Read Dead: Hunting, Genocide, and Extinction Stories Several contemporary novels, including Linda Hogan’s People of the Whale (2009) and Robert Barclay’s Melal (2002), feature scenes of indigenous hunting of marine mammals gone spectacularly wrong: people are killed, animal deaths are unnecessarily prolonged, and all inhabit polluted landscapes.
    [Show full text]
  • Derogatory Discourses of Veganism and the Reproduction of Speciesism in UK 1 National Newspapers Bjos 1348 134..152
    The British Journal of Sociology 2011 Volume 62 Issue 1 Vegaphobia: derogatory discourses of veganism and the reproduction of speciesism in UK 1 national newspapers bjos_1348 134..152 Matthew Cole and Karen Morgan Abstract This paper critically examines discourses of veganism in UK national newspapers in 2007. In setting parameters for what can and cannot easily be discussed, domi- nant discourses also help frame understanding. Discourses relating to veganism are therefore presented as contravening commonsense, because they fall outside readily understood meat-eating discourses. Newspapers tend to discredit veganism through ridicule, or as being difficult or impossible to maintain in practice. Vegans are variously stereotyped as ascetics, faddists, sentimentalists, or in some cases, hostile extremists. The overall effect is of a derogatory portrayal of vegans and veganism that we interpret as ‘vegaphobia’. We interpret derogatory discourses of veganism in UK national newspapers as evidence of the cultural reproduction of speciesism, through which veganism is dissociated from its connection with debates concerning nonhuman animals’ rights or liberation. This is problematic in three, interrelated, respects. First, it empirically misrepresents the experience of veganism, and thereby marginalizes vegans. Second, it perpetuates a moral injury to omnivorous readers who are not presented with the opportunity to understand veganism and the challenge to speciesism that it contains. Third, and most seri- ously, it obscures and thereby reproduces
    [Show full text]
  • Stronger, Together
    T R O N G E S —Together— R 2015 Annual Report 2 COMMUNITY BRIDGES | COMMUNITYBRIDGES.ORG COMMUNITY BRIDGES PUENTES DE LA COMUNIDAD STRONGER, TOGETHER Dear Friend, With nearly 500 nonprofits in Santa Cruz County alone, we thank you for choosing Community Bridges. We understand and value your commitment to us, and we don’t take it for granted. We know how hard you work for your dollar, and we promise to use it in the most effective way possible. Our goal is to work together to accomplish more for our community at a lower cost. We know that while each of our 10 programs is remarkable on their own, together, we’re unstoppable. Every day, your support makes it possible to empower seniors, increase access to medical care and good nutrition, and give children a better chance at life through education and family support. As you’ll see in this report, 2015 was an amazing year. We came together more than ever before, consolidating resources across our programs to improve services for our community. We helped more than 27,000 local kids, families and seniors in need live their best lives. And your support made all of it possible. Thank you for joining us in this mission that touches every part of the Santa Cruz County communities we hold so dear. With your continued support in 2016, we can do even more. Thank you, Raymon Cancino Linda Fawcett Chief Executive Officer Board Chair STRONGER, TOGETHER | COMMUNITYBRIDGES.ORG 3 THE IMPACT OF OUR 10 PROGRAMS It's amazing what we can accomplish together: ople we each pe ed he T 6,555 fAmiliES e av e g 13,265 3,000 t w ChildrEn/yOuTh pEOplE WiTh r diSABiliTiES po up 2,537 e SEniOrS h 2,000 T nurSing mothErS 300 vETEr EXpEri300EnCing AnS hOmElessNESS 1,400 SinglE mothEr S 36Q % live in north 52% County.
    [Show full text]
  • Antonia Márcia Artico
    UNIVERSIDADE PAULISTA CIBERATIVISMO E AS ESTRATÉGIAS COMUNICACIONAIS NOS MOVIMENTOS ABOLICIONISTAS VEGANOS Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Comunicação e Cultura Midiática da Universidade Paulista – UNIP, para obtenção do título de mestre em Comunicação. ANTONIA MÁRCIA ARTICO SÃO PAULO 2015 UNIVERSIDADE PAULISTA CIBERATIVISMO E AS ESTRATÉGIAS COMUNICACIONAIS NOS MOVIMENTOS ABOLICIONISTAS VEGANOS Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Comunicação e Cultura Midiática da Universidade Paulista – UNIP, para obtenção do título de mestre em Comunicação. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Jorge Miklos ANTONIA MÁRCIA ARTICO SÃO PAULO 2015 Artico, Antonia Marcia. Ciberativismo e as estratégias comunicacionais nos movimentos abolicionistas veganos / Antonia Marcia Artico - 2015. 141 f.: il. color. + CD-ROM. Dissertação de Mestrado apresentada ao Programa de Pós- Graduação em Comunicação da Universidade Paulista, São Paulo, 2015. Área de Concentração: Contribuições da Mídia para a Interação entre Grupos Sociais. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Jorge Miklos. 1. Abolicionismo vegano. 2. Ciberativismo . 3. Direitos dos animais. 4. Mídia radical. 5. Movimentos sociais contemporâneos. I. Miklos, Jorge (orientador). II. Título ANTONIA MARCIA ARTICO CIBERATIVISMO E AS ESTRATÉGIAS COMUNICACIONAIS NOS MOVIMENTOS ABOLICIONISTAS VEGANOS Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Comunicação e Cultura Midiática da Universidade Paulista – UNIP, para obtenção do título de mestre em Comunicação. Aprovado em: ____/____/_______ BANCA
    [Show full text]
  • Articles 1. the Case for Animal Protection Curricula in Schools In
    Volume 2 Issue 1 Student Journal of Professional Practice and Academic Research Northumbria University – ISSN 2632-0452 – All content CC-BY 4.0 Articles 1. The Case For Animal Protection Curricula in Schools in Hong Kong, Claudia Man- yiu Tam, The University of Hong Kong 2. Identifying Genocide: The Yazidi Massacre in the Context of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide 1948, Jade Potot-Warren, Northumbria University Dissertations 1. Reasonable responses versus proportionality in employee dismissal cases: A comparison between the Employment Rights Act 1996, s 98(4) and the Equality Act 2010, s 13(2), s 15(1)(b), and s 19(2)(d). Susan B O’Brien, Northumbria University 2. Has the Supreme Court condemned the rule from Pinnel’s Case to irrelevancy? An Examination of Rock Advertising v MWB Business Exchange Centres and its effect on the Part Payment of Debt Rule, Promissory Estoppel, and No Oral Modification Clauses. Jaxson Hind, Northumbria University 3. Feminist Judicial Decision-Making as Judicial Decision-Making: A Legitimate and Valuable Approach? Felicity Adams Undergraduate Posters 1. Approaches to Law 19/20 – Poster Conference. Various Authors Oral Presentation 1. The Ghosts Around the Coasts: Anarchy and Equity in Transboundary River Basins, Mohsen Nagheeby, Northumbria University Volume 2 Issue 1 Student Journal of Professional Practice and Academic Research Editorial My Call was Answered! Rachel Dunn, Northumbria University In my last editorial, I called on more students, from any university, to send their work to the journal. The response to this has been amazing and the journal is expanding to all corners of the globe! This issue shows some of those submissions, and there have been more submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Animals Liberation Philosophy and Policy Journal Volume 5, Issue 2
    AAnniimmaallss LLiibbeerraattiioonn PPhhiilloossoopphhyy aanndd PPoolliiccyy JJoouurrnnaall VVoolluummee 55,, IIssssuuee 22 -- 22000077 Animal Liberation Philosophy and Policy Journal Volume 5, Issue 2 2007 Edited By: Steven Best, Chief Editor ____________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Lev Tolstoy and the Freedom to Choose One’s Own Path Andrea Rossing McDowell Pg. 2-28 Jewish Ethics and Nonhuman Animals Lisa Kemmerer Pg. 29-47 Deliberative Democracy, Direct Action, and Animal Advocacy Stephen D’Arcy Pg. 48-63 Should Anti-Vivisectionists Boycott Animal-Tested Medicines? Katherine Perlo Pg. 64-78 A Note on Pedagogy: Humane Education Making a Difference Piers Bierne and Meena Alagappan Pg. 79-94 BOOK REVIEWS _________________ Fast Food Nation: The Dark Side of the All-American Meal, by Eric Schlosser (2005) Reviewed by Lisa Kemmerer Pg. 95-101 Eternal Treblinka: Our Treatment of Animals and the Holocaust, by Charles Patterson (2002) Reviewed by Steven Best Pg. 102-118 The Longest Struggle: Animal Advocacy from Pythagoras to PETA, by Norm Phelps (2007) Reviewed by Steven Best Pg. 119-130 Journal for Critical Animal Studies, Volume V, Issue 2, 2007 Lev Tolstoy and the Freedom to Choose One’s Own Path Andrea Rossing McDowell, PhD It is difficult to be sat on all day, every day, by some other creature, without forming an opinion about them. On the other hand, it is perfectly possible to sit all day every day, on top of another creature and not have the slightest thought about them whatsoever. -- Douglas Adams, Dirk Gently’s Holistic Detective Agency (1988) Committed to the idea that the lives of humans and animals are inextricably linked, Lev Nikolayevich Tolstoy (1828–1910) promoted—through literature, essays, and letters—the animal world as another venue in which to practice concern and kindness, consequently leading to more peaceful, consonant human relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Teen Stabbing Questions Still Unanswered What Motivated 14-Year-Old Boy to Attack Family?
    Save $86.25 with coupons in today’s paper Penn State holds The Kirby at 30 off late Honoring the Center’s charge rich history and its to beat Temple impact on the region SPORTS • 1C SPECIAL SECTION Sunday, September 18, 2016 BREAKING NEWS AT TIMESLEADER.COM '365/=[+<</M /88=C6@+83+sǍL Teen stabbing questions still unanswered What motivated 14-year-old boy to attack family? By Bill O’Boyle Sinoracki in the chest, causing Sinoracki’s wife, Bobbi Jo, 36, ,9,9C6/Ľ>37/=6/+./<L-97 his death. and the couple’s 17-year-old Investigators say Hocken- daughter. KINGSTON TWP. — Specu- berry, 14, of 145 S. Lehigh A preliminary hearing lation has been rampant since St. — located adjacent to the for Hockenberry, originally last Sunday when a 14-year-old Sinoracki home — entered 7 scheduled for Sept. 22, has boy entered his neighbors’ Orchard St. and stabbed three been continued at the request house in the middle of the day members of the Sinoracki fam- of his attorney, Frank Nocito. and stabbed three people, kill- According to the office of ing one. ily. Hockenberry is charged Magisterial District Justice Everyone connected to the James Tupper and Kingston case and the general public with homicide, aggravated assault, simple assault, reck- Township Police Chief Michael have been wondering what Moravec, the hearing will be lessly endangering another Photo courtesy of GoFundMe could have motivated the held at 9:30 a.m. Nov. 7 at person and burglary in connec- In this photo taken from the GoFundMe account page set up for the Sinoracki accused, Zachary Hocken- Tupper’s office, 11 Carverton family, David Sinoracki is shown with his wife, Bobbi Jo, and their three children, berry, to walk into a home on tion with the death of David Megan 17; Madison, 14; and David Jr., 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Framing Farming: Communication Strategies for Animal Rights Critical Animal Studies 2
    Framing Farming: Communication Strategies for Animal Rights Critical Animal Studies 2 General Editors: Helena Pedersen, Stockholm University (Sweden) Vasile Stănescu, Mercer University (U.S.) Editorial Board: Stephen R.L. Clark, University of Liverpool (U.K.) Amy J. Fitzgerald, University of Windsor (Canada) Anthony J. Nocella, II, Hamline University (U.S.) John Sorenson, Brock University (Canada) Richard Twine, University of London and Edge Hill University (U.K.) Richard J. White, Sheffield Hallam University (U.K.) Framing Farming: Communication Strategies for Animal Rights Carrie P. Freeman Amsterdam - New York, NY 2014 Critical Animal Studies 2. Carrie P. Freeman, Framing Farming: Communication Strategies for Animal Rights. 1. Kim Socha, Women, Destruction, and the Avant-Garde. A Paradigm for Animal Liberation. This book is printed on recycled paper. Cover photo: Jo-Anne McArthur / We Animals The paper on which this book is printed meets the requirements of “ISO 9706:1994, Information and documentation - Paper for documents - Requirements for permanence”. ISBN: 978-90-420-3892-9 E-Book ISBN: 978-94-012-1174-1 © Editions Rodopi B.V., Amsterdam – New York, NY 2014 Printed in The Netherlands Table of Contents List of Images 9 Foreword 11 Author’s perspective and background 11 Acknowledgements 14 Dedication 15 Chapter 1: Introduction 17 Themes and Theses in This Book 19 The Unique Contributions of This Book 20 Social Significance of Vegetarianism & Animal Rights 22 The Structure and Content of This Book 26 Word Choice 29 PART I OVERVIEW OF ANIMAL RIGHTS, VEGETARIANISM, AND COMMUNICATION Chapter 2: Ethical Views on Animals as Fellows & as Food 33 Development of Animal Activism in the United States 34 Western Thought on Other Animals 36 Western Vegetarian Ethics 43 Human Eating Habits 62 Chapter 3: Activist Communication Strategy & Debates 67 Communication and the Social Construction of Reality 68 Strategies for Social Movement Organizations 75 Ideological Framing Debates in U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Personhood for Animals and the Intersectionality of the Civil & Animal Rights Movements
    Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality Volume 4 Issue 2 Article 5 2016 Free Tilly?: Legal Personhood for Animals and the Intersectionality of the Civil & Animal Rights Movements Becky Boyle Indiana University Maurer School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijlse Part of the Law Commons Publication Citation Becky Boyle, Free Tilly?: Legal Personhood for Animals and the Intersectionality of the Civil & Animal Rights Movements, 4 Ind. J. L. & Soc. Equality 169 (2016). This Student Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality Volume 4, Issue 2 FREE TILLY?: LEGAL PERSONHOOD FOR ANIMALS AND THE INTERSECTIONALITY OF THE CIVIL & ANIMAL RIGHTS MOVEMENTS BECKY BOYLE INTRODUCTION In February 2012, the District Court for the Southern District of California heard Tilikum v. Sea World, a landmark case for animal legal defense.1 The organization People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) filed a suit as next friends2 of five orca whales demanding their freedom from the marine wildlife entertainment park known as SeaWorld.3 The plaintiffs—Tilikum, Katina, Corky, Kasatka, and Ulises—were wild born and captured to perform at SeaWorld’s Shamu Stadium.4 They sought declaratory and injunctive relief for being held by SeaWorld in violation of slavery and involuntary servitude provisions of the Thirteenth Amendment.5 It was the first court in U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sexual Politics of Meat by Carol J. Adams
    THE SEXUAL POLITICS OF MEAT A FEMINISTVEGETARIAN CRITICAL THEORY Praise for The Sexual Politics of Meat and Carol J. Adams “A clearheaded scholar joins the ideas of two movements—vegetari- anism and feminism—and turns them into a single coherent and moral theory. Her argument is rational and persuasive. New ground—whole acres of it—is broken by Adams.” —Colman McCarthy, Washington Post Book World “Th e Sexual Politics of Meat examines the historical, gender, race, and class implications of meat culture, and makes the links between the prac tice of butchering/eating animals and the maintenance of male domi nance. Read this powerful new book and you may well become a vegetarian.” —Ms. “Adams’s work will almost surely become a ‘bible’ for feminist and pro gressive animal rights activists. Depiction of animal exploita- tion as one manifestation of a brutal patriarchal culture has been explored in two [of her] books, Th e Sexual Politics of Meat and Neither Man nor Beast: Feminism and the Defense of Animals. Adams argues that factory farming is part of a whole culture of oppression and insti- tutionalized violence. Th e treatment of animals as objects is parallel to and associated with patriarchal society’s objectifi cation of women, blacks, and other minorities in order to routinely exploit them. Adams excels in constructing unexpected juxtapositions by using the language of one kind of relationship to illuminate another. Employing poetic rather than rhetorical techniques, Adams makes powerful connec- tions that encourage readers to draw their own conclusions.” —Choice “A dynamic contribution toward creating a feminist/animal rights theory.” —Animals’ Agenda “A cohesive, passionate case linking meat-eating to the oppression of animals and women .
    [Show full text]
  • 4​Th​ MINDING ANIMALS CONFERENCE CIUDAD DE
    th 4 ​ MINDING ANIMALS CONFERENCE ​ CIUDAD DE MÉXICO, 17 TO 24 JANUARY, 2018 SOCIAL PROGRAMME: ROYAL PEDREGAL HOTEL ACADEMIC PROGRAMME: NATIONAL AUTONOMOUS UNIVERSITY OF MEXICO Auditorio Alfonso Caso and Anexos de la Facultad de Derecho FINAL PROGRAMME (Online version linked to abstracts. Download PDF here) 1/47 All delegates please note: ​ 1. Presentation slots may have needed to be moved by the organisers, and may appear in a different place from that of the final printed programme. Please consult the schedule located in the Conference Programme upon arrival at the Conference for your presentation time. 2. Please note that presenters have to ensure the following times for presentation to allow for adequate time for questions from the floor and smooth transition of sessions. Delegates must not stray from their allocated 20 minutes. Further, delegates are welcome to move within sessions, therefore presenters MUST limit their talk to the allocated time. Therefore, Q&A will be AFTER each talk, and NOT at the end of the three presentations. Plenary and Invited Talks – 45 min. presentation and 15 min. discussion (Q&A). 3. For panels, each panellist must stick strictly to a 10 minute time frame, before discussion with the floor commences. 4. Note that co-authors may be presenting at the conference in place of, or with the main author. For all co-authors, delegates are advised to consult the Conference Abstracts link on the Minding Animals website. Use of the term et al is provided where there is more than two authors ​ ​ of an abstract. 5. Moderator notes will be available at all front desks in tutorial rooms, along with Time Sheets (5, 3 and 1 minute Left).
    [Show full text]