DOCSLIB.ORG

Baldassi2019.Pdf (4.774Mb)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Baldassi2019.Pdf (4.774Mb) This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. The Leucippides in Greek Myth: Abductions, Rituals and Weddings Claudia Baldassi PhD Classics The University of Edinburgh 2018 I declare that this thesis has been composed solely by myself and that it has not been submitted, in whole or in part, in any previous application for a degree. Except where stated otherwise by reference or acknowledgment, the work presented is entirely my own. Claudia Baldassi I Abstract This project focuses on the myth of the Leucippides. The two daughters of the Messenian king Leucippus, occasionally identified as Phoibe and Hilaeira, are mostly known for being abducted by the Dioscuri in a secondary episode of the Dioscuri’s life. Their story is short and lacking in details, but it has a huge potential for an interdisciplinary approach meant to highlight the relevance and diversity of uses of an allegedly minor myth. The sources available are limited in number but span the sixth – possibly seventh – century BC to the Imperial age and are spread throughout Greece and Magna Graecia. It is doubtless a persistent and widespread myth. I have chosen an innovative transversal approach, rarely used in the field, to pursue the clearest and most complete picture of the Leucippides possible given the current state of knowledge. All primary sources – ranging from poetry to historiography, epigraphy, visual arts and archaeology – have been considered. Every source has been analysed in its individuality, against its cultural backdrop and, finally, in relation to the others. This research pursues a better understanding of the story of the Leucippides. At its core, my study aims to take a step further than the mere collection and description of all sources available; my goal is the identification of the meanings and ways of use of our myth in different contexts in the Greek world and, where possible, the recognition of larger trends that bypassed geographical boundaries. In particular, the present research investigates the relationship between the myth of the Leucippides and its wider social and cultural context, inside the society in which it appears, taking into due account the different times and places. I analyse a series of points of interest that isolate the Leucippides from the backdrop of similar myths. The story of the Leucippides, in fact, contributes to the discussion of female identity-making processes in Greece, of active relationships between myth and society, of the cultural and exemplary nature of abduction stories and their connection to marriage, and of the transmission, geographical expansion and reception of myth in different contexts. This study is innovative in its approach to the entirety of sources available and unique in its reconstruction of a long-neglected myth and of its interaction with more II articulated questions concerning society and culture. Given the large number of secondary characters in Greek myth and the limited pool of studies devoted to them so far, studies such as mine could serve as a model for others to follow. This study will be a stepping stone for further studies on the Dioscuri and Helen through the family and the thematic connections tying them to the Leucippides, but also for comparative approaches to abduction and related Indo-European myths. III Lay Summary In a scarcely attested episode of Greek myth, the Leucippides (the two daughters of the Messenian king Leucippus) are abducted by the Dioscuri (Spartan twin heroes, sons of Zeus), who desire to marry them. In this research, the story of the Leucippides will be used as a case study to investigate the interactions and reciprocal influences of myth and historical society in ancient Greece. Myth, in fact, was a pervasive element in ancient Greek society; it was the favourite topic of poets and artists, it was entwined with religion and shaped the collective memory of the past. Most myths were multifaceted and could be productively used in different contexts with different focuses and messages. The story of the Leucippides is set against this backdrop. I shall identify and analyse the core traits of this episode and its social, religious and even political inflexions. By examining where, when and how it was represented, I shall suggest possible interpretations of how the abduction of the Leucippides was used to transmit specific messages and was contextually read by its users. In particular, I aim to demonstrate the exemplariness of our myth for rites of passage concerning girls entering adulthood and preparing for marriage. Although similar stories are known to Greek mythology, the abduction of the Leucippides, in fact, stands out for its geographical spread, chronological persistence and regularity of traits. Therefore, this research aims to draw a picture of the Leucippides inside the society in which they appeared, using an innovative method based on a highly comparative and interdisciplinary approach. It will fill the gaps in the research on these characters specifically, but it will also contribute to a series of relevant discussions in modern scholarship in the field, such as female identity-making processes in Greece, active relationships between myth and society, the cultural and exemplary nature of abduction stories and their symbolic connection to marriage, and the transmission, geographical expansion and reception of myth in different times and places. IV Acknowledgements I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my principal supervisor Prof Douglas Cairns for his continuous support, patience and guidance. Appreciation is also due to my assistant supervisor Prof Judy Barringer, whose expertise and hard questions have been invaluable for the completion of this thesis. I am indebted to my assistant supervisor Dr Lilah Grace Canevaro for her insightful comments, encouragement and our stimulating discussions. I would also like to thank my examiners, Prof Vinciane Pirenne-Delforge and Dr Richard Rawles, for their valuable input and illuminating suggestions. I am grateful to Dr Simon Trépanier for his feedback throughout the years and to the School of History, Classics and Archaeology at the University of Edinburgh for offering me such an intellectually stimulating environment. I thank all my friends and colleagues in the PhD Classics community at Edinburgh for the great years we spent together, and a special thanks goes to my proofreaders: Celeste De Blois, Sam Ellis, Mark Huggins, Alison John, Dorothy Longley-Cook, Rory Nutter and Thaddeus Thorp. My heartfelt gratitude goes to my parents, who have always believed in me. V Table of Contents Table of contents p. 1 Introduction p. 4 1. Introduction to the characters: the myth in literary sources p. 24 1.1 A standard version? p. 26 1.2 The Apharetidae p. 32 1.2.1 The engagement p. 43 2. A myth in context: the Leucippides in Sparta p. 58 2.1 The Spartan Dioscuri p. 59 2.2 Political use and value p. 65 2.3 Social implications p. 72 2.4 The cult: the temple p. 74 2.5 The priestesses: Apollo and Dionysus p. 78 2.6 The Hyacinthia p. 86 2.7 Alcman p. 94 2.8 Independent cult p. 102 2.9 Individual existence p. 106 2.10 Conclusion on the cult – the nature of the Leucippides p. 111 3. A myth in context: the Leucippides in the Greek world p. 113 3.1 Magna Graecia p. 114 3.1.1 Rhegion p. 114 3.1.2 Suggestions from Locri p. 117 3.1.3 Rhegion again: more evidence p. 120 3.1.4 Poseidonia p. 122 3.1.5 Concluding remarks p. 125 1 3.2 Argos p. 126 3.3 Delphi: Siphnos p. 136 3.3.1 The Siphnian Treasury p. 138 3.4 Apulia-Taras p. 146 3.4.1 Introduction p. 147 3.4.2 The Dioscuri p. 151 3.4.3 The Leucippides p. 156 3.4.4 The vases p. 161 3.4.5 Conclusions p. 166 4. A myth in context: the Leucippides in Athens p. 168 4.1 Introduction p. 168 4.2 A myth from afar – a local myth p. 169 4.2.1 Athens and Argos p. 170 4.2.2 Athens and Sparta p. 178 4.2.3 Athens and Taras p. 186 4.2.4 Conclusions p. 189 4.3 Local developments p. 190 4.4 Abduction before marriage – abduction as marriage p. 194 4.4.1 Wedding as abduction, abduction as wedding: a shifting boundary for a p. 196 social model 4.4.2 The abduction of the Leucippides or the Leucippides’ wedding? p. 204 4.5 The abduction as a rite of passage: the sanctuary p. 212 4.6 The other side of the coin: the heroic quest of male maturation p. 219 Conclusion p. 224 Appendix A – Abduction as marriage: parallel stories p. 227 Appendix B – Catalogue of literary sources p. 247 Appendix C – Catalogue of visual sources p. 264 2 Bibliography p. 294 Index locorum p. 336 Index of objects p. 339 3 Introduction This study deals with the Greek myth of the Leucippides, the two daughters of King Leucippus of Messenia.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Hellenic Saga Gaia (Earth)
    The Hellenic Saga Gaia (Earth) Uranus (Heaven) Oceanus = Tethys Iapetus (Titan) = Clymene Themis Atlas Menoetius Prometheus Epimetheus = Pandora Prometheus • “Prometheus made humans out of earth and water, and he also gave them fire…” (Apollodorus Library 1.7.1) • … “and scatter-brained Epimetheus from the first was a mischief to men who eat bread; for it was he who first took of Zeus the woman, the maiden whom he had formed” (Hesiod Theogony ca. 509) Prometheus and Zeus • Zeus concealed the secret of life • Trick of the meat and fat • Zeus concealed fire • Prometheus stole it and gave it to man • Freidrich H. Fuger, 1751 - 1818 • Zeus ordered the creation of Pandora • Zeus chained Prometheus to a mountain • The accounts here are many and confused Maxfield Parish Prometheus 1919 Prometheus Chained Dirck van Baburen 1594 - 1624 Prometheus Nicolas-Sébastien Adam 1705 - 1778 Frankenstein: The Modern Prometheus • Novel by Mary Shelly • First published in 1818. • The first true Science Fiction novel • Victor Frankenstein is Prometheus • As with the story of Prometheus, the novel asks about cause and effect, and about responsibility. • Is man accountable for his creations? • Is God? • Are there moral, ethical constraints on man’s creative urges? Mary Shelly • “I saw the pale student of unhallowed arts kneeling beside the thing he had put together. I saw the hideous phantasm of a man stretched out, and then, on the working of some powerful engine, show signs of life, and stir with an uneasy, half vital motion. Frightful must it be; for supremely frightful would be the effect of any human endeavour to mock the stupendous mechanism of the Creator of the world” (Introduction to the 1831 edition) Did I request thee, from my clay To mould me man? Did I solicit thee From darkness to promote me? John Milton, Paradise Lost 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Summaries of the Trojan Cycle Search the GML Advanced
    Document belonging to the Greek Mythology Link, a web site created by Carlos Parada, author of Genealogical Guide to Greek Mythology Characters • Places • Topics • Images • Bibliography • PDF Editions About • Copyright © 1997 Carlos Parada and Maicar Förlag. Summaries of the Trojan Cycle Search the GML advanced Sections in this Page Introduction Trojan Cycle: Cypria Iliad (Synopsis) Aethiopis Little Iliad Sack of Ilium Returns Odyssey (Synopsis) Telegony Other works on the Trojan War Bibliography Introduction and Definition of terms The so called Epic Cycle is sometimes referred to with the term Epic Fragments since just fragments is all that remain of them. Some of these fragments contain details about the Theban wars (the war of the SEVEN and that of the EPIGONI), others about the prowesses of Heracles 1 and Theseus, others about the origin of the gods, and still others about events related to the Trojan War. The latter, called Trojan Cycle, narrate events that occurred before the war (Cypria), during the war (Aethiopis, Little Iliad, and Sack of Ilium ), and after the war (Returns, and Telegony). The term epic (derived from Greek épos = word, song) is generally applied to narrative poems which describe the deeds of heroes in war, an astounding process of mutual destruction that periodically and frequently affects mankind. This kind of poetry was composed in early times, being chanted by minstrels during the 'Dark Ages'—before 800 BC—and later written down during the Archaic period— from c. 700 BC). Greek Epic is the earliest surviving form of Greek (and therefore "Western") literature, and precedes lyric poetry, elegy, drama, history, philosophy, mythography, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • HOMERIC-ILIAD.Pdf
    Homeric Iliad Translated by Samuel Butler Revised by Soo-Young Kim, Kelly McCray, Gregory Nagy, and Timothy Power Contents Rhapsody 1 Rhapsody 2 Rhapsody 3 Rhapsody 4 Rhapsody 5 Rhapsody 6 Rhapsody 7 Rhapsody 8 Rhapsody 9 Rhapsody 10 Rhapsody 11 Rhapsody 12 Rhapsody 13 Rhapsody 14 Rhapsody 15 Rhapsody 16 Rhapsody 17 Rhapsody 18 Rhapsody 19 Rhapsody 20 Rhapsody 21 Rhapsody 22 Rhapsody 23 Rhapsody 24 Homeric Iliad Rhapsody 1 Translated by Samuel Butler Revised by Soo-Young Kim, Kelly McCray, Gregory Nagy, and Timothy Power [1] Anger [mēnis], goddess, sing it, of Achilles, son of Peleus— 2 disastrous [oulomenē] anger that made countless pains [algea] for the Achaeans, 3 and many steadfast lives [psūkhai] it drove down to Hādēs, 4 heroes’ lives, but their bodies it made prizes for dogs [5] and for all birds, and the Will of Zeus was reaching its fulfillment [telos]— 6 sing starting from the point where the two—I now see it—first had a falling out, engaging in strife [eris], 7 I mean, [Agamemnon] the son of Atreus, lord of men, and radiant Achilles. 8 So, which one of the gods was it who impelled the two to fight with each other in strife [eris]? 9 It was [Apollo] the son of Leto and of Zeus. For he [= Apollo], infuriated at the king [= Agamemnon], [10] caused an evil disease to arise throughout the mass of warriors, and the people were getting destroyed, because the son of Atreus had dishonored Khrysēs his priest. Now Khrysēs had come to the ships of the Achaeans to free his daughter, and had brought with him a great ransom [apoina]: moreover he bore in his hand the scepter of Apollo wreathed with a suppliant’s wreath [15] and he besought the Achaeans, but most of all the two sons of Atreus, who were their chiefs.
    [Show full text]
  • Naming the Extrasolar Planets
    Naming the extrasolar planets W. Lyra Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69177, Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Abstract and OGLE-TR-182 b, which does not help educators convey the message that these planets are quite similar to Jupiter. Extrasolar planets are not named and are referred to only In stark contrast, the sentence“planet Apollo is a gas giant by their assigned scientific designation. The reason given like Jupiter” is heavily - yet invisibly - coated with Coper- by the IAU to not name the planets is that it is consid- nicanism. ered impractical as planets are expected to be common. I One reason given by the IAU for not considering naming advance some reasons as to why this logic is flawed, and sug- the extrasolar planets is that it is a task deemed impractical. gest names for the 403 extrasolar planet candidates known One source is quoted as having said “if planets are found to as of Oct 2009. The names follow a scheme of association occur very frequently in the Universe, a system of individual with the constellation that the host star pertains to, and names for planets might well rapidly be found equally im- therefore are mostly drawn from Roman-Greek mythology. practicable as it is for stars, as planet discoveries progress.” Other mythologies may also be used given that a suitable 1. This leads to a second argument. It is indeed impractical association is established. to name all stars. But some stars are named nonetheless. In fact, all other classes of astronomical bodies are named.
    [Show full text]
  • Iphigenia in Aulis by Euripides Translated by Nicholas Rudall Directed by Charles Newell
    STUDY GUIDE Photo of Mark L. Montgomery, Stephanie Andrea Barron, and Sandra Marquez by joe mazza/brave lux, inc Sponsored by Iphigenia in Aulis by Euripides Translated by Nicholas Rudall Directed by Charles Newell SETTING The action takes place in east-central Greece at the port of Aulis, on the Euripus Strait. The time is approximately 1200 BCE. CHARACTERS Agamemnon father of Iphigenia, husband of Clytemnestra and King of Mycenae Menelaus brother of Agamemnon Clytemnestra mother of Iphigenia, wife of Agamemnon Iphigenia daughter of Agamemnon and Clytemnestra Achilles son of Peleus Chorus women of Chalcis who came to Aulis to see the Greek army Old Man servant of Agamemnon, was given as part of Clytemnestra’s dowry Messenger ABOUT THE PLAY Iphigenia in Aulis is the last existing work of the playwright Euripides. Written between 408 and 406 BCE, the year of Euripides’ death, the play was first produced the following year in a trilogy with The Bacchaeand Alcmaeon in Corinth by his son, Euripides the Younger, and won the first place at the Athenian City Dionysia festival. Agamemnon Costume rendering by Jacqueline Firkins. 2 SYNOPSIS At the start of the play, Agamemnon reveals to the Old Man that his army and warships are stranded in Aulis due to a lack of sailing winds. The winds have died because Agamemnon is being punished by the goddess Artemis, whom he offended. The only way to remedy this situation is for Agamemnon to sacrifice his daughter, Iphigenia, to the goddess Artemis. Agamemnon then admits that he has sent for Iphigenia to be brought to Aulis but he has changed his mind.
    [Show full text]
  • Myth, the Marvelous, the Exotic, and the Hero in the Roman D'alexandre
    Myth, the Marvelous, the Exotic, and the Hero in the Roman d’Alexandre Paul Henri Rogers A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Romance Languages (French) Chapel Hill 2008 Approved by: Dr. Edward D. Montgomery Dr. Frank A. Domínguez Dr. Edward D. Kennedy Dr. Hassan Melehy Dr. Monica P. Rector © 2008 Paul Henri Rogers ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii Abstract Paul Henri Rogers Myth, the Marvelous, the Exotic, and the Hero in the Roman d’Alexandre Under the direction of Dr. Edward D. Montgomery In the Roman d’Alexandre , Alexandre de Paris generates new myth by depicting Alexander the Great as willfully seeking to inscribe himself and his deeds within the extant mythical tradition, and as deliberately rivaling the divine authority. The contemporary literary tradition based on Quintus Curtius’s Gesta Alexandri Magni of which Alexandre de Paris may have been aware eliminates many of the marvelous episodes of the king’s life but focuses instead on Alexander’s conquests and drive to compete with the gods’ accomplishments. The depiction of his premature death within this work and the Roman raises the question of whether or not an individual can actively seek deification. Heroic figures are at the origin of divinity and myth, and the Roman d’Alexandre portrays Alexander as an essentially very human character who is nevertheless dispossessed of the powerful attributes normally associated with heroic protagonists.
    [Show full text]
  • Virgil in English Verse Eclogues and Eneid I. Vi
    V I R G I L I N E N G L I S H V E R S E — E CL OGUE S an d E NE ID I . VI . B Y TH E W RIGHT HON . SIR CHA RLES BO EN ’ ONE OF H E R MAJ EST Y S LORDS J U ST ICES OF APPEAL ON CE FELLOW AND N O W VI S I T OR OF BALLI O L C OLLE GE H O D. L O TH E NI VERS I Y O O ORD C . U X N . F T F F HON . D . O THE U N IVERS I Y O E D I NB RGH LL . F T F U SE CON D E DITION LONDON J O HN M Y A L B E M A RL E T E ET U RRA , S R 1 889 a A l l. r i g h t s w w r v ml wi o q fi g ? PRIN TED BY ‘ - SPO ISWOODE AN D CO . N EW S REE S U RE TT , T T Q A LON DON E P R E F A C . A TRANSLATOR of Virgil into E n glish verse finds the road along w hich he has undertaken to travel strewn with the bleachin g bones of unfortunate pilgrims who have pre c ede d him Th a o f e . e adventures an d the f te the great r number have been briefly set forth in an essay published by the late Profes sor Conington in the Quar terly Review of J uly 1 86 1 , and reprinted in the first volume of his m iscellaneous w s .
    [Show full text]
  • V:-". : . C: Izxhr. Hnrmexsunriimmiwxewu
    d-'-'rzsaz: V:-". ... ...... :::::::: : . c: iZxhr. hnrmexsunriimmiwxewu:! .. -••• '.: VIRGIL RK Sfre SSeneJ- ScL ues eorqics TRANSLATED BY J. W. MACKAIL WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY WILLIAM C. McDERMOTT ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF CLASSICAL STUDIES, UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ^T)ie ^/loJern • Orient ^IJorlc CONTENTS VAQiA Introduction by William C. McDermott ... vii The Aeneid Book First............................................................ 3 The Coming of Aeneas to Carthage Book Second................................................................... 23 The Story of the Sack of Troy Book Third................................................................... 44 The Story of the Seven Years’ Wandering Book Fourth................................................................... 63 The Love of Dido, and Her End Book Fifth................................................................... 82 The Games of the Fleet Book Sixth................................................................. 104 The Vision of the Under World Book Seventh................................................................. 128 The Landing in Latium, and the Roll of the Armies of Italy Book Eighth..................................................................150 The Embassage to Evander Book Ninth................................................................. 169 The Siege of the Trojan Camp Book Tenth................................................................. 190 The Battle on the Beach Book Eleventh..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chthonians in Sicily Curbera, Jaime B Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Winter 1997; 38, 4; Proquest Pg
    Chthonians in Sicily Curbera, Jaime B Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Winter 1997; 38, 4; ProQuest pg. 397 Chthonians in Sicily Jaime B. Curbera To the memory of Giuseppe Nenci ICILY WAS FAMOUS for her chthonic deities. 1 According to tradition, Hades abducted Kore at Syracuse, Henna, or SAetna; Pindar calls Acragas <l>EpoE<j)6vac; EDOC; (Pyth. 12.2); and the whole island was said to be sacred to Demeter and Kore (Diod. 5.2.3; Cic. Verr. 2.4.106). Indeed, archaeological and numismatic evidence abundantly confirms the literary sources.2 This paper deals with some previously unnoticed epi­ thets of Sicily's chthonic gods and with the reflection of their cult on personal names on the island. I. The Kyria Earlier in this century, a grave in ancient Centuripae, some 30 km southwest of Mt Aetna, yielded an interesting lead curse tablet, first published by Domenico Comparetti after a drawing by Paolo Orsi, and again, in apparent ignorance of Comparetti's edition, by Francesco Ribezzo with a drawing from autopsy.3 Neither text was satisfactory. Using Orsi's and Ribezzo's drawings, J. J. E. Hondius, "adiuvantibus Cr[onert] et Wil­ h[elm]," produced in 1929 what is now the best text, SEG IV 61. I Abbreviations: DTAud=A. Audollent, Defixionum tabellae quotquot in­ notuerunt (Paris 1904); DTWu=R. Wunsch, Defixionum tabellae (Berlin 1897); IGDS=L. Dubois, Inscriptions grecques dialectales de Sicile (Rome 1989); Jordan=D. R. Jordan, • A Survey of Greek Defixiones Not Included in the Special Corpora," GRBS 26 (1985) 151-97. 2 See e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Jména Řecké a Římské Mythologie V Nomenklatuře Netopýrů, S Poznámkou Ke Jménu Myotis Alcathoe
    Vespertilio 12: 107–128, 2008 ISSN 1213-6123 Jména řecké a římské mythologie v nomenklatuře netopýrů, s poznámkou ke jménu Myotis alcathoe Petr be n d a zoologické oddělení PM, Národní museum, Václavské nám. 68, CZ–115 79 Praha 1, Česko & katedra zoologie, PřF University Karlovy, Viničná 7, CZ–128 44 Praha 2, Česko; [email protected] Names from Greek and Roman mythology in bat nomenclature, with a note on the name Myotis alcathoe. In bat nomenclature, at least sixty names used in 115 taxa which correspond with the names from ancient mythology or history were created by 50 authors. Most of these names were created in the first quarter of the 20th century (44), in the era of Oldfield Thomas (author of 24 of these names), Knud Andersen (12) and Gerrit Smith Miller (6). Until now 62 of the bat names taken from antiquity remain valid as genus or species names. Most recently, a name of this type was created by Otto von Helversen and Klaus-Gerhard Heller in 2001 for Myotis alcathoe. According to the authors of description, Alcathoe (also Alcithoe or Alcythoe) – from Greek Άλκαθόη and Άλκιθόη – was a nymph and the vernacular name ‘nymph bat’ was suggested for this species. However, this name was found to be related to a name of mythical princess, a daughter of the king Minyas of Orchomenos in Greece. None of the old traditions showed her to be a nymph. Because the princess refused, along with her sisters, to honour the god Dionysos (Bakchus) and she did her usual housework, the god turned her into a bat and her sisters also into bats or, according to other ancient traditions, into birds (owl, eagle owl, crow).
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Meskanen Eeva Leena Helena 0740810 Ethesis
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Questioning militarism in Spartan religion analysis of dedications from four Spartan sanctuaries Meskanen, Helena Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 06. Oct. 2021 Questioning Militarism in Spartan Religion: Analysis of Dedications from Four Spartan Sanctuaries Eeva Leena Helena Meskanen For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy King’s College London 2019 ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pelops Hippodamia Pelops Pelops Hippodamia Zeus
    Tantalus = X Œnomaüs = Y Niobe Pelops = Hippodamia Chrysippus Lydia Pisa Mycenæ & Argos Peloponnese Hippodamia Pelops Hippodamia Pelops Pelops Hippodamia Zeus Œnomaüs Temple of Zeus, Olympia Tantalus = X Œnomaüs = Y Niobe Pelops = Hippodamia Pittheus Chysippus Atreus Thyestes Thebes Pisa Mycenæ & Argos Peloponnese Atreus vs Thyestes Sign 1: Golden Fleece Aëropē Sign 2: The Sun Delphic Oracle: Must beget child by own daughter, Pelopia Atreus = Aëropē Thyestes = X Pelopia Agamemnon Menelaus Ægisthus Mycenæ & Argos Sparta Recognition token: sword Leda wife of Tyndareus Leda Icarius Tyndareus = Leda Zeus Penelope Clytemnestra Castor Helen Polydeuces Clytemnestra = Agamemnon Helen = Menelaus Clytemnestra = Agamemnon Helen = Menelaus Iphigenia Orestes Electra Hermione Mycenæ / Argos Sparta Castor and Polydeuces Helen’s Suitors Oath of Tyndareus devised by Odysseus Winner: Menelaus Æacus = X (Ægina) Thetis = Peleus Telamon Phocus Achilles Telamonian Ajax (“The Greater”) (Phthia) (Salamis) Myrmidons = ant-men Phthia Salamis Ægina Peleus Thetis Eris Wedding of Peleus and Thetis Judgment of Paris Judgment of Paris Etruscan mirror Uni = Juno = Hera Menrfa = Minerva = Athena Turan = Venus = Aphrodite Georges Dumézil idéologie tripartite (three-part ideology) Sovereignty Kings Sanctity Hera Priests Law Warriors Military Power Athena Economy Peasants Fertility Aphrodite Production Priam = Hecuba Paris Hector many many (Alexander) (50+) (10+) other daughters sons Heinrich Schliemann discovered Troy (Wilusa) 1871 wife in “Helen’s Jewels” Where’s Odysseus? Odysseus = Penelope Telemachus Prophecy: Troy will not fall until/unless Achilles fights for the Greeks. Peleus = Thetis Achilles Achilles and Chiron Prophecy: Troy will not fall until/unless Achilles fights for the Greeks. Achilles on Scyros If I remain here, attacking city of the mighty Trojans, I lose my nostos, but I will have undying kleos.
    [Show full text]