DOCSLIB.ORG

Coyote Creek South Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Coyote Creek South Management Plan Coyote Creek South Management Plan Photo credit: Philip Bayles Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 4034 Fairiew Industrial Drive SE Salem, Oregon 97302 March 2016 LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS The following individuals, mainly consisting of Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife biologists and program coordinators, provided valuable input into this plan: • Ann Kreager, Willamette Wildlife Mitigation Project Biologist, South Willamette Watershed, ODFW • Emily Steel, Restoration Ecologist, City of Eugene • Trevor Taylor, Natural Areas Restoration Team Supervisor, City of Eugene • Bruce Newhouse, Ecologist, Salix Associates • David Stroppel, Habitat Program Manager, South Willamette Watershed, ODFW • Wayne Morrow, Wildlife Manager, Fern Ridge Wildlife Area, ODFW • Kevin Roth, Wildlife Technician Senior, Fern Ridge Wildlife Area, ODFW In addition, the plan draws on the work of professional ecologists and planners, and feedback from a wide variety of representatives from ODFW and partner agencies, including: • Ed Alverson, Botanist • Diane Steeck, Wetland Ecologist, City of Eugene • Paul Gordon, Wetland Technical Specialist, City of Eugene • Steve Marx, SW Watershed District Manager, ODFW • Bernadette Graham-Hudson, Fish & Wildlife Operations and Policy Analyst, ODFW • Laura Tesler, Wildlife Wildlife Mitigation Staff Biologist, ODFW • Shawn Woods, Willamette Wildlife Mitigation Restoration Biologist, ODFW • Sue Beilke, Willamette Wildlife Mitigation Project Biologist, ODFW • Susan Barnes, NW Region Wildlife Diversity Biologist, ODFW • Keith Kohl, Wildlife Area Operations Coordinator, ODFW • David Budeau, Assistant Staff Biologist, ODFW • Chris Yee, Asst. Wildlife Biologist, ODFW • David Budeau, Game Bird Staff Biologist, ODFW • Chris Yee, Asst. Wildlife Biologist, ODFW • Katie MacKendrick, Restoration Ecologist, Long Tom Watershed Council • Jarod Jabousek, Wildlife Biologist, USFWS Partners for Fish and Wildlife Program • Wes Messinger, Botanist, US Army Corps of Engineers • Garrett Dorsey, Wildlife Biologist, US Army Corps of Engineers • Bob Altman, American Bird Conservancy • Stan van de Wetering, Confederated tribes of Siletz Indians • Kelly Warren, Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs • Lawrence Schwabe, Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde FINAL Executive Summary ............................................................................................... 6 1 Introduction and Background ................................................................ 8 1.1 Purpose of the Management Plan ............................................................................. 10 1.2 Conservation Values........................................................................................................ 10 1.3 ODFW Mission and Authority ...................................................................................... 11 1.4 Property and Administrative Oversight ................................................................... 11 1.5 Willamette Wildlife Mitigation Program ................................................................. 11 1.6 Ecological Significance of the Coyote Creek South Site.................................... 12 2 Site Description and Public Use ........................................................... 14 2.1 Existing Conditions .......................................................................................................... 14 2.1.1 Landscape Setting ................................................................................... 14 2.1.2 Physical Description, Topography, and Boundaries ............................... 14 2.1.3 Habitat Types/Land Use/Invasive Vegetation ........................................ 18 2.1.4 Coyote Creek ........................................................................................... 20 2.1.5 Soils and Geology .................................................................................... 22 2.1.6 Facilities, Roads, and Maintenance Access ............................................. 24 2.2 Site History ......................................................................................................................... 25 2.2.1 Historic Vegetation ................................................................................. 25 2.2.2 Historic and Cultural Land Use ................................................................ 25 2.2.3 Cultural Resources/SHPO Consultation .................................................. 27 2.3 Public Access and Site Use ........................................................................................... 28 2.3.1 Public Access, Use, and Recreation ........................................................ 28 2.3.2 BPA Conservation Easement ................................................................... 31 2.3.3 Zoning ..................................................................................................... 32 2.3.4 Agricultural Lease ................................................................................... 32 2.4 Environmental Setting .................................................................................................... 32 2.4.1 Climate .................................................................................................... 32 2.4.2 Hazardous Waste .................................................................................... 33 2.4.3 Water Rights ........................................................................................... 33 3 Strategy Habitats and Species: Existing Conditions, Threats, and Conservation Importance ..................................................................... 33 3.1 Strategy Habitats .............................................................................................................. 35 3.1.1 Priority Habitats ...................................................................................... 35 3.1.2 Important Restorable Habitats ............................................................... 47 3.2 Priority Conservation Species ...................................................................................... 49 4 Strategy Habitats: Desired Future Conditions and Management Goals and Objectives ............................................................................. 50 4.1 Priority Habitats ................................................................................................................ 52 4.1.1 Wetlands ................................................................................................. 52 4.1.2 Riparian Forest ........................................................................................ 57 FINAL 4.1.3 Freshwater Aquatic ................................................................................. 59 4.2 Important Restorable Habitats .................................................................................... 61 4.2.1 Oak Savanna ........................................................................................... 61 4.2.2 Grasslands ............................................................................................... 63 5 Public Access and Use ........................................................................... 65 5.1 Desired Future Conditions and Goals, Objectives, and Strategies ................ 65 6 Management Plan Implementation ..................................................... 69 6.1 Prioritization of Restoration and Enhancement Actions with Suggested Timeframes ................................................................................................................................... 69 6.2 Projected Restoration Timeline and Activities ...................................................... 70 6.3 Adaptive Management .................................................................................................. 77 6.4 Monitoring .......................................................................................................................... 78 6.4.1 Effectiveness Monitoring ........................................................................ 78 6.4.2 Compliance Monitoring .......................................................................... 79 6.5 Planning Process and Public Participation ............................................................. 79 6.6 Regulatory Requirements ............................................................................................. 80 6.7 Operations & Management ......................................................................................... 81 6.8 Management Plan Development and Reporting ................................................. 81 6.9 Management Staff Contact Information ................................................................. 82 7 References Cited .................................................................................... 83 FINAL List of Figures Figure 1. Landscape Setting ........................................................................................................................................ 9 Figure 2. Conservation Context .............................................................................................................................. 16 Figure 3. Site Features and Topography ............................................................................................................ 17 Figure 4. Habitat Type and Land Use .................................................................................................................. 19 Figure 5. Hydrology ..................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bromfield Garden Plant List - 2009
    BROMFIELD GARDEN PLANT LIST - 2009 BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME Acer circinatum vine maple Achillea millefolium yarrow Achillea millefolium 'Judity' yarrow 'Judity' Achillea millefolium 'La Luna' yarrow 'La Luna' Achillea millefolium 'Paprika' yarrow 'Paprika' Achillea millefolium 'Salmon' yarrow 'Salmon' Achillea millefolium 'Sonoma Coast' yarrow 'Sonoma Coast' Aesculus californica California buckeye Aquilegia formosa western columbine Arctostaphylos 'Pacific Mist' manzanita 'Pacific Mist' Arctostaphylos hookeri 'Ken Taylor' manzanita 'Ken Taylor' Aristolochia californica California pipevine Armeria maritima sea pink Artemisia pycnocephala sandhill sage Asarum caudatum wild ginger Aster chilensis California aster Aster chilensis dwarf California aster Baccharis pilularis 'Twin Peaks' dwarf coyote brush 'Twin Peaks' Berberis aquifolium var repens creeping Oregon-grape Berberis nervosa dwarf Oregon-grape Blechnum spicant deer fern Calycanthus occidentalis spice bush Camissonia cheiranthifolia beach evening primrose Carex tumulicola Berkeley sedge Carpenteria californica bush anenome Ceanothus 'Concha' wild lilac 'Concha' Ceanothus 'Tilden Park' wild lilac 'Tilden Park' Cercis occidentalis western redbud Cercocarpus betuloides mountain mahogany Clematis lasiantha chaparral clematis Cornus sericea creek dogwood Corylus cornuta western hazelnut Dicentra formosa western bleeding heart Dichondra donneliana pony's foot Dryopteris arguta coastal wood fern Dudleya caespitosa sea lettuce Dudleya farinosa bluff lettuce Dudleya pulverulenta chalk liveforever
    [Show full text]
  • Ecogeographic, Genetic and Taxonomic Studies of the Genus Lathyrus L
    ECOGEOGRAPHIC, GENETIC AND TAXONOMIC STUDIES OF THE GENUS LATHYRUS L. BY ALI ABDULLAH SHEHADEH A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Biosciences College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Birmingham March 2011 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT Lathyrus species are well placed to meet the increasing global demand for food and animal feed, at the time of climate change. Conservation and sustainable use of the genetic resources of Lathyrus is of significant importance to allow the regain of interest in Lathyrus species in world. A comprehensive global database of Lathyrus species originating from the Mediterranean Basin, Caucasus, Central and West Asia Regions is developed using accessions in major genebanks and information from eight herbaria in Europe. This Global Lathyrus database was used to conduct gap analysis to guide future collecting missions and in situ conservation efforts for 37 priority species. The results showed the highest concentration of Lathyrus priority species in the countries of the Fertile Crescent, France, Italy and Greece.
    [Show full text]
  • CHLOROPLAST Matk GENE PHYLOGENY of SOME IMPORTANT SPECIES of PLANTS
    AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ DERGİSİ, 2005, 18(2), 157-162 CHLOROPLAST matK GENE PHYLOGENY OF SOME IMPORTANT SPECIES OF PLANTS Ayşe Gül İNCE1 Mehmet KARACA2 A. Naci ONUS1 Mehmet BİLGEN2 1Akdeniz University Faculty of Agriculture Department of Horticulture, 07059 Antalya, Turkey 2Akdeniz University Faculty of Agriculture Department of Field Crops, 07059 Antalya, Turkey Correspondence addressed E-mail: [email protected] Abstract In this study using the chloroplast matK DNA sequence, a chloroplast-encoded locus that has been shown to be much more variable than many other genes, from one hundred and forty two plant species belong to the families of 26 plants we conducted a study to contribute to the understanding of major evolutionary relationships among the studied plant orders, families genus and species (clades) and discussed the utilization of matK for molecular phylogeny. Determined genetic relationship between the species or genera is very valuable for genetic improvement studies. The chloroplast matK gene sequences ranging from 730 to 1545 nucleotides were downloaded from the GenBank database. These DNA sequences were aligned using Clustal W program. We employed the maximum parsimony method for phylogenetic reconstruction using PAUP* program. Trees resulting from the parsimony analyses were similar to those generated earlier using single or multiple gene analyses, but our analyses resulted in strict consensus tree providing much better resolution of relationships among major clades. We found that gymnosperms (Pinus thunbergii, Pinus attenuata and Ginko biloba) were different from the monocotyledons and dicotyledons. We showed that Cynodon dactylon, Panicum capilare, Zea mays and Saccharum officiarum (all are in the C4 metabolism) were improved from a common ancestors while the other cereals Triticum Avena, Hordeum, Oryza and Phalaris were evolved from another or similar ancestors.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants at Fort Ross State Historic Park
    19005 Coast Highway One, Jenner, CA 95450 ■ 707.847.3437 ■ [email protected] ■ www.fortross.org Title: Vascular Plants at Fort Ross State Historic Park Author(s): Dorothy Scherer Published by: California Native Plant Society i Source: Fort Ross Conservancy Library URL: www.fortross.org Fort Ross Conservancy (FRC) asks that you acknowledge FRC as the source of the content; if you use material from FRC online, we request that you link directly to the URL provided. If you use the content offline, we ask that you credit the source as follows: “Courtesy of Fort Ross Conservancy, www.fortross.org.” Fort Ross Conservancy, a 501(c)(3) and California State Park cooperating association, connects people to the history and beauty of Fort Ross and Salt Point State Parks. © Fort Ross Conservancy, 19005 Coast Highway One, Jenner, CA 95450, 707-847-3437 .~ ) VASCULAR PLANTS of FORT ROSS STATE HISTORIC PARK SONOMA COUNTY A PLANT COMMUNITIES PROJECT DOROTHY KING YOUNG CHAPTER CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY DOROTHY SCHERER, CHAIRPERSON DECEMBER 30, 1999 ) Vascular Plants of Fort Ross State Historic Park August 18, 2000 Family Botanical Name Common Name Plant Habitat Listed/ Community Comments Ferns & Fern Allies: Azollaceae/Mosquito Fern Azo/la filiculoides Mosquito Fern wp Blechnaceae/Deer Fern Blechnum spicant Deer Fern RV mp,sp Woodwardia fimbriata Giant Chain Fern RV wp Oennstaedtiaceae/Bracken Fern Pleridium aquilinum var. pubescens Bracken, Brake CG,CC,CF mh T Oryopteridaceae/Wood Fern Athyrium filix-femina var. cyclosorum Western lady Fern RV sp,wp Dryopteris arguta Coastal Wood Fern OS op,st Dryopteris expansa Spreading Wood Fern RV sp,wp Polystichum munitum Western Sword Fern CF mh,mp Equisetaceae/Horsetail Equisetum arvense Common Horsetail RV ds,mp Equisetum hyemale ssp.affine Common Scouring Rush RV mp,sg Equisetum laevigatum Smooth Scouring Rush mp,sg Equisetum telmateia ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Biogeographically Based Population Introduction Protocols for At-Risk Willamette Valley Plant Species
    Developing biogeographically based population introduction protocols for at-risk Willamette Valley plant species: Agrostis howellii (Howell’s bentgrass) Aster curtus (white-topped aster), Aster vialis (wayside aster), Delphinium leucophaeum (hot rock larkspur), Delphinium pavonaceaum (peacock larkspur), Erigeron decumbens var. decumbens (Willamette daisy), Horkelia congesta ssp. congesta (shaggy horkelia), Lomatium bradshawii (Bradshaw’s desert parsley), Lupinus sulphureus ssp. kincaidii (Kincaid’s lupine), Montia howellii (Howell’s montia), Sidalcea spp. (Willamette Valley checkermallows) Prepared by Steven D. Gisler Native Plant Conservation Program Oregon Department of Agriculture with contributions by Oregon Department of Agriculture staff for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Grant OR-EP-2, segment 13 Acknowledgements: We would like to thank the many people who contributed to the completion of this report. Thanks to Andy Robinson and Kathy Pendergrass (USFWS) for providing funding and encouragement (Grant no. OR-EP-2, segment 13). Kelly Amsberry, Rebecca Currin, and R.J. Meinke contributed to text completion and review, and Melissa Carr provided invaluable assistance in compiling data. Thanks also to the staff, interns and students who provided plant and habitat photos, and to Erin Amsberry Abood for assistance in final report preparation. Contact Information: Robert J. Meinke Kelly Amsberry Native Plant Conservation Program Native Plant Conservation Program Oregon Department of Agriculture Oregon Department of Agriculture Dept. of Botany and Plant Pathology Dept. of Botany and Plant Pathology Oregon State University Oregon State University Corvallis, OR 97331 Corvallis, OR 97331 (541) 737-2317 (541) 737-4333 [email protected] [email protected] Report format: The following species are presented in alphabetical order: Agrostis howellii (Howell’s bentgrass), Aster curtus (white-topped aster), Aster vialis (wayside aster), Delphinium leucophaeum (hot rock larkspur), Delphinium pavonaceaum (peacock larkspur), Erigeron decumbens var.
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 9-17-2018 Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park" (2018). Botanical Studies. 85. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/85 This Flora of Northwest California-Checklists of Local Sites is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A CHECKLIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF THE REDWOOD NATIONAL & STATE PARKS James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State Univerity Arcata, California 14 September 2018 The Redwood National and State Parks are located in Del Norte and Humboldt counties in coastal northwestern California. The national park was F E R N S established in 1968. In 1994, a cooperative agreement with the California Department of Parks and Recreation added Del Norte Coast, Prairie Creek, Athyriaceae – Lady Fern Family and Jedediah Smith Redwoods state parks to form a single administrative Athyrium filix-femina var. cyclosporum • northwestern lady fern unit. Together they comprise about 133,000 acres (540 km2), including 37 miles of coast line. Almost half of the remaining old growth redwood forests Blechnaceae – Deer Fern Family are protected in these four parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Common and Scientific Names for Fish and Wildlife Species Found in Idaho
    APPENDIX A: COMMON AND SCIENTIFIC NAMES FOR FISH AND WILDLIFE SPECIES FOUND IN IDAHO. How to Read the Lists. Within these lists, species are listed phylogenetically by class. In cases where phylogeny is incompletely understood, taxonomic units are arranged alphabetically. Listed below are definitions for interpreting NatureServe conservation status ranks (GRanks and SRanks). These ranks reflect an assessment of the condition of the species rangewide (GRank) and statewide (SRank). Rangewide ranks are assigned by NatureServe and statewide ranks are assigned by the Idaho Conservation Data Center. GX or SX Presumed extinct or extirpated: not located despite intensive searches and virtually no likelihood of rediscovery. GH or SH Possibly extinct or extirpated (historical): historically occurred, but may be rediscovered. Its presence may not have been verified in the past 20–40 years. A species could become SH without such a 20–40 year delay if the only known occurrences in the state were destroyed or if it had been extensively and unsuccessfully looked for. The SH rank is reserved for species for which some effort has been made to relocate occurrences, rather than simply using this status for all elements not known from verified extant occurrences. G1 or S1 Critically imperiled: at high risk because of extreme rarity (often 5 or fewer occurrences), rapidly declining numbers, or other factors that make it particularly vulnerable to rangewide extinction or extirpation. G2 or S2 Imperiled: at risk because of restricted range, few populations (often 20 or fewer), rapidly declining numbers, or other factors that make it vulnerable to rangewide extinction or extirpation. G3 or S3 Vulnerable: at moderate risk because of restricted range, relatively few populations (often 80 or fewer), recent and widespread declines, or other factors that make it vulnerable to rangewide extinction or extirpation.
    [Show full text]
  • DICOTS Aceraceae Maple Family Anacardiaceae Sumac Family
    FLOWERINGPLANTS Lamiaceae Mint family (ANGIOSPERMS) Brassicaceae Mustard family Prunella vulgaris - Self Heal Cardamine nutallii - Spring Beauty Satureja douglasii – Yerba Buena Rubiaceae Madder family DICOTS Galium aparine- Cleavers Boraginaceae Borage family Malvaceae Mallow family Galium trifidum – Small Bedstraw Aceraceae Maple family Cynoglossum grande – Houndstongue Sidalcea virgata – Rose Checker Mallow Acer macrophyllum – Big leaf Maple Oleaceae Olive family MONOCOTS Anacardiaceae Sumac family Fraxinus latifolia - Oregon Ash Toxicodendron diversilobum – Poison Oak Cyperaceae Sedge family Plantaginaceae Plantain family Carex densa Apiaceae Carrot family Plantago lanceolata – Plantain Anthriscus caucalis- Bur Chervil Iridaceae Iris family Daucus carota – Wild Carrot Portulacaceae Purslane family Iris tenax – Oregon Iris Ligusticum apiifolium – Parsley-leaved Claytonia siberica – Candy Flower Lovage Claytonia perforliata – Miner’s Lettuce Juncaceae Rush family Osmorhiza berteroi–Sweet Cicely Juncus tenuis – Slender Rush Sanicula graveolens – Sierra Sanicle Cynoglossum Photo by C.Gautier Ranunculaceae Buttercup family Delphinium menziesii – Larkspur Liliaceae Lily family Asteraceae Sunflower family Caryophyllaceae Pink family Ranunculus occidentalis – Western Buttercup Allium acuminatum – Hooker’s Onion Achillea millefolium – Yarrow Stellaria media- Chickweed Ranunculus uncinatus – Small-flowered Calochortus tolmiei – Tolmie’s Mariposa Lily Adendocaulon bicolor – Pathfinder Buttercup Camassia quamash - Camas Bellis perennis – English
    [Show full text]
  • Spring Overnight
    Columbines School of Botanical Studies Spring Apprenticeship Program Trip #11-12 Spring Overnight June 22-23, 24-25, 27-28 2017 Low Elevation Coniferous Woods and Disturbed Areas 1100' Low Elevation Coniferous Woods and Seepy Cliffs 2000' Low Elevation Coniferous Woods, Riparian, and Meadow 2400' Low Elevation Coniferous Woods and Riparian 2500' Middle Elevation Coniferous Woods and Meadow 3728' Middle Elevation Coniferous Woods and Meadows 4800' Middle Elevation Coniferous Woods and Beargrass Meadows 5620' http://www.botanicalstudies.net/botany/plantlists.php Family Name Uses Seen Araceae Lysichiton americanus (L. Skunk Cabbage +/- Edible X americanum) Liliaceae Calochortus subalpinus Alpine Cat's Ears No Pick X Calochortus tolmiei Cat's Ears No Pick X Clintonia uniflora Queen's Cup, Bead Lily Poisonous? X Erythronium grandiflorum Glacier Lily No Pick X Erythronium oregonum Fawn Lily No Pick Lilium columbianum Tiger Lily No Pick X Lilium washingtonianum Cascade Lily No Pick Prosartes hookeri (Disporum Fairy Bells +/- Edible X hookeri) Streptopus amplexifolius Twisted Stalk +/- Edible X Streptopus lanceolatus (S. roseus) Rosy Twisted Stalk +/- Edible Asparagaceae (Liliaceae) Brodiaea elegans Elegant Brodiaea No Pick Dichelostemma congestum Harvest Lily X (Brodiaea congesta) No Pick Maianthemum dilitatum False Wild Lily of the Valley Poisonous, Medicinal Maianthemum racemosum (Smilacina racemosa) Maianthemum stellatum (Smilacina Small False Solomon's Seal +/- Edible, Medicinal X stellata) Melanthiaceae (Liliaceae) Anticlea occidentalis
    [Show full text]
  • A Revision and Phylogeny of Eulonchus Gerstaecker (Diptera, Acroceridae)
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeysJewelled 619: 103–146 spider (2016) flies of North America: a revision and phylogeny ofEulonchus Gerstaecker... 103 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.619.8249 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Jewelled spider flies of North America: a revision and phylogeny of Eulonchus Gerstaecker (Diptera, Acroceridae) Christopher J. Borkent1, Jessica P. Gillung1, Shaun L. Winterton1 1 California State Collection of Arthropods, California Department of Food and Agriculture, 3294 Mea- dowview Road, Sacramento, CA 95832, USA Corresponding author: Christopher J. Borkent ([email protected]) Academic editor: T. Dikow | Received 24 February 2016 | Accepted 2 September 2016 | Published 27 September 2016 http://zoobank.org/DEE67859-64AC-4C3F-8DF7-67A7BE1868FB Citation: Borkent CJ, Gillung JP, Winterton SL (2016) Jewelled spider flies of North America: a revision and phylogeny of Eulonchus Gerstaecker (Diptera, Acroceridae). ZooKeys 619: 103–146. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.619.8249 Abstract The spider fly genus Eulonchus Gerstaecker is found throughout the Nearctic Region. Six species are recognized and intraspecific morphological variation is documented in several species. A phylogeny of Eulonchus based on DNA sequence data of three molecular markers (COI, CAD, and 16S) is presented and relationships of species are discussed in the light of biogeography and host usage. All six species of Eulonchus are redescribed using natural language descriptions exported from a character matrix, and a key to species is presented. Lectotypes are designated for E. sapphirinus Osten Sacken, E. smaragdinus Gerstaecker, and E. tristis Loew. Keywords Antrodiaetidae, Euctenizidae, spider parasitoid, phylogeny, small-headed fly, tarantula, biodiversity, cy- bertaxonomy, Lucid Introduction Acroceridae are a small group of flies commonly known as spider flies or small-headed flies.
    [Show full text]
  • Cibulnaté a Hlíznaté Rostliny
    Cibulnaté a hlíznaté rostliny Přehled druhů 2: Asparagales Řád Asparagales rozsáhlý řád, 14 čeledí, některé obrovské semena rostlin obsahují černé barvivo melanin (některé druhy ho druhotně ztratily) Hosta PREZENTACE © JN Iridaceae (kosatcovité) Řád Asparagales Čeleď Iridaceae (kosatcovité) vytrvalé byliny s oddenky, hlízami, nebo cibulemi stonek přímý nevětvený, někdy zkrácený listy mečovité nebo čárkovité, dvouřadé se souběžnou žilnatinou květy jednotlivé nebo v chudých květenstvích (vějířek nebo srpek) – významné druhy okrasného zahradnictví subtropy až mírné pásmo 70/1750, ČR 3/12 PREZENTACE © JN Iridaceae (kosatcovité) Řád Asparagales Čeleď Iridaceae (kosatcovité) Zahradnicky významné jsou: mečíky (Gladiolus), frézie (Freesia), kosatce (Iris), šafrány (Crocus) Mezi další zahradnicky významné Iridaceae patří např. Crocosmia, Ixia, Tigridia © Saxifraga-Dirk Hilbers © Saxifraga-Inigo Sanchez Iris xiphium http://www.freenatureimages.eu/Plants/Flora%20D-I/Iris%20xiphium/slides/Iris%20xiphium%201,%20Saxifraga-Dirk%20Hilbers.jpg http://www.freenatureimages.eu/Plants/Flora%20D-I/Iris%20xiphium/slides/Iris%20xiphium%202,%20Saxifraga-Inigo%20Sanchez.jpg Iridaceae (kosatcovité) Iris (kosatec) zahrnuje i množství druhů které se neřadí mezi cibuloviny. Do cibulovin patří kosatce sekce Xiphium a Reticulata Sekce Xiphium - původní druhy pocházejí ze středomoří, hlavně Pyrenejí, zde rostou v 1500 m na mořem Cibule se 3-5 masitými šupinami, žlábkovité listy , stvol s 2-3 tuhými zelenými listeny a 2-3 květy, jsou modré se žlutým středem na vnějších okvětních lístcích, v přírodě kvetou koncem června Křížením původních druh této sekce hlavně Iris xiphium a I. tingitana vzniklo velké množství kutivarů – označované jako Dutch iris (holandské kosatce), pěstují se tržně v mnoha barvách (od bílé, žluté, modré až po fialovou) a prodávají jako řezané květiny např.
    [Show full text]