DOCSLIB.ORG

Shrubland Ecosystem Genetics and Biodiversity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Shrubland Ecosystem Genetics and Biodiversity A Century of Genetics Daniel J. Fairbanks Abstract—In 1866, Gregor Mendel published his experiments on In the year 2000, the science of genetics celebrated its th heredity in the garden pea (Pisum sativum). The fundamental 100 anniversary. In the spring and early summer of 1900, principles of inheritance derived from his work apply to nearly all three botanists, Hugo de Vries, Carl Correns, and Erich von eukaryotic species and are now known as Mendelian principles. Tschermack, reported their simultaneous and independent Since 1900, Mendel has been recognized as the founder of genetics. rediscovery of Mendel’s principle of segregation, an event In 1900, three botanists, Carl Correns, Hugo De Vries, and Erich that sparked the rapid establishment of genetics as a new Tschermack von Seysenegg, had independently completed experi- and important science. This paper highlights just a few of ments that were similar to Mendel’s, although much less extensive. the major events that have made genetics one of the most When searching the literature, all three encountered Mendel’s powerful and rapidly progressing sciences. paper and realized that he had described the principles of inherit- Although genetics entered mainstream science rather ance and the experimental data to confirm them 34 years earlier. suddenly in 1900, it traces its origin to the mid-1800s with With their rediscovery, the science of genetics was born in 1900 the experiments of Gregor Mendel. In 1843, Mendel entered along with the 20th century. William Bateson coined the term the St. Thomas monastery in the city of Brno, now in the “genetics” and was the person most responsible for establishing the Czech Republic, and was soon appointed as a seventh-grade new science in the first decade of the 20th century. Thomas Hunt science teacher. He failed his teacher certification examina- Morgan and his students established the chromosomal basis of tion, an event that prompted the abbot of the monastery to heredity beginning in 1910. During the 1920s and 1930s, classical send him to the University of Vienna. While at the Univer- genetics was established, and eugenics became very popular among sity, Mendel was enamored with the teachings of his botany the more educated and wealthy members of society. Laws mandat- professor, Dr. Franz Unger, who, even though Darwin’s ing sterilization of perceived unfit people were passed and carried Origin of Species had not yet been published, focused his out. By the late 1930s, Nicolai Vavilov had published his theory of teachings on the evolution of species over long periods of centers of origin for cultivated plants and established a gene bank geological time. During the time that Mendel was a student, for his collections in Leningrad. During the siege of Leningrad in Unger wrote an article in which he wrote this remarkable 1941–1942, nine of his coworkers chose to die of starvation rather passage that foreshadowed Mendel’s work: “Who can deny than sacrifice the seeds and tubers that Vavilov had collected. In the that new combinations arise out of this permutation of meantime, Vavilov was imprisoned for his opposition to Lysenko- vegetation, always reducible to certain law-combinations, ism. He soon died in prison of maltreatment. In the mid-1940s, which emancipate themselves from the preceding character- George Beadle and Edward Tatum discovered the relationship istics of the species and appear as a new species” (Orel 1996). between genes and enzymes, and Oswald Avery and his coworkers Unger’s teachings infuriated the local clergy who attempted discovered that DNA is the genetic material of a bacterial species. to have him dismissed. Among the most vocal was Dr. Sebastian In the early 1950s, Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase discovered Brunner who wrote of Unger as “a man who openly denied the that DNA is the genetic material of a bacteriophage. Shortly after Creation and the Creator” and as one of the “professors at so- this time, in 1953, James Watson and Francis Crick determined the called Catholic Universities [who] deliver lectures on really structure of DNA based on evidence collected in several laborato- beastly theories for years on end” (Olby 1985). Ironically ries. Cracking the genetic code became one of the next priorities, a Mendel was a devout member of the clergy, but he appears to task that was completed in the 1960s. During the 1970s, recombi- have sided with Unger. Mendel wrote of his own work as “the nant DNA was made, an event that led to molecular applications in only right way by which we can finally reach the solution of a genetics and genetic engineering. The first genetically engineered question the importance of which cannot be overestimated in pharmaceuticals soon followed. The 1970s and 1980s saw the connection with the history of the evolution of organic forms” development of efficient methods for DNA sequencing, which ulti- (Stern and Sherwood 1966). mately led to whole genome sequencing. The first bacterial genome In 1852, Mendel began experiments with pea hybrids that was sequenced in 1995, the Brewer’s yeast genome in 1996, and the would last for 8 years. From the scientific literature that he Drosophila, Arabidopsis, and human genomes in 2000. Fittingly, had read extensively he already knew of the concept of the sequencing of the human genome, one of the greatest accom- dominance in peas for four of the seven traits he studied. His plishments in genetics, came at the 100th birthday of the science of contribution was his development of a mathematical model genetics. to explain heredity. He discovered regular 3:1 ratios in the F2 generations in all seven of his monohybrid experiments, and developed the now familiar mathematical model to explain the 3:1 ratio, which he expressed in the following equation: In: McArthur, E. Durant; Fairbanks, Daniel J., comps. 2001. Shrubland A A a a ecosystem genetics and biodiversity: proceedings; 2000 June 13–15; Provo, +++ UT. Proc. RMRS-P-21. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest A a A a Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Daniel J. Fairbanks is a Professor in the Department of Botany and Range where the letters in the numerator represent the alleles Science, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602. contributed by the male parent and those in the denominator 42 USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-21. 2001 A Century of Genetics Fairbanks as the alleles contributed by the female parent. Because the theory of inheritance espoused by Bateson and the chromo- large A is dominant, three of the four combinations produce somal theory of inheritance promoted by Edmund Wilson, the dominant phenotype and one the recessive. He tested also at Columbia. He opted instead for de Vries’ mutation this model by allowing the F2 plants to self fertilize to theory (which differs substantially from our current under- 1 produce F3 offspring. He found that ⁄3 of the F2 plants with standing of mutation). Complaining of the intellectual cli- the dominant phenotype produced offspring with only the mate at Columbia, Morgan wrote in 1905 that it was “an 2 dominant phenotype, and that ⁄3 produced offspring with atmosphere saturated with chromosomic acid” (Allen 1978). both dominant and recessive phenotypes, precisely as his He completely reversed his views, however, within 5 years model predicted. as he brought Mendelian and chromosomal theories of He then turned his attention to dihybrid and trihybrid inheritance together as a single theory. In 1910 he observed experiments to ascertain whether the inheritance of one a white-eyed fruit fly that was to change the direction of his trait influences the inheritance of another. He discovered career and the science of genetics. He discovered that the that all seven traits in various combinations of twos and white-eye phenotype was associated with inheritance of the threes were inherited independently of one another. On X chromosome. these two discoveries, the mathematical segregation of dif- At first, he was reluctant to conclude that the genes were fering elements and the independent inheritance of traits, actually a part of the chromosome. However, two discoveries are based the two laws of inheritance attributed to Mendel: by his students, Alfred Sturtevant and Calvin Bridges, made the law of segregation and the law of independent assortment. it clear that their so-called sex-linked genes must be a Mendel presented his paper in 1865 and had it published physical part of the X chromosome. Sturtevant, as an under- the following year (Mendel 1866). For the next 34 years, no graduate student in 1911, had a flash of genius when he one, including Mendel, recognized that the laws he discov- realized that genes might be located in a linear fashion on ered applied almost universally to plants, animals, and the chromosome. He gathered up the notebooks with the humans. His paper was not completely forgotten; it was cited data from several of their experiments, and, in his words, “I at least 15 times before 1900. However, it is clear from these went home and spent most of the night (to the neglect of my citations that no one recognized its most important points. undergraduate homework) in producing the first chromo- Mendel sent reprints with cover letters to several botanists, some map” (Sturtevant 1965). He placed five genes on a including Franz Unger, his former professor, but the only linear map and calculated the distances between them one to respond was Karl von Nägeli, who carried on corre- based on the frequencies of crossing over. Bridges discovered spondence with Mendel over a period of 7 years. Mendel had in 1913 that unusual cases of inheritance of mutant sex- initiated studies with the hawkweed, and Nägeli encour- linked alleles were associated with nondisjunction of chro- aged Mendel to continue with these species.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ERNST CASPARI and CURT STERN2 University of Rochester, Rochester, N
    THE INFLUENCE OF CHRONlC IRRADIATION WITH GAMMA- RAYS AT LOW DOSAGES ON THE MUTATION RATE IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER‘ ERNST CASPARI AND CURT STERN2 University of Rochester, Rochester, N. Y. Received November 25, 1947 HE influence of radiation of short wave length on the mutation rate in TDrosophila has been measured repeatedly since the pioneer work of MUL- LER (1927). As a general rule it was found that the mutation rate is directly proportional to the dose of radiation, as expressed in r units. This linear pro- portionality between radiation dose and mutation rate applies to all dosages of X-rays tested to the present time except for the highest dosages, in which a “saturation effect” comes into play. At the low end of the curve, SPENCER and STERN(1948) found the proportionalitv maintained down to a dose of 25 r. It was furthermore found that at high and medium dosages the mutation rate was independent of the intensity, that is, of the time over which the ap- plication of a certain number of r units was spread. This was established by PATTERSON(1931) and OLIVER(1932) and others for X-rays, and by HANSON and HEYS(1929, 1932) and KAYCHAUDHURI(1939) for gamma-rays. TIMO- F~EFF-RESSOVSKYand ZrMMER (1935) have calculated that in all experiments a dose of about 3600 r would result in a mutation rate of ten sex-linked reces- sive lethals per IOO treated sperms. The experiments reported in this paper have been undertaken in order to examine the question of whether or not the rule that the mutation rate is independent of the time of irradiation also holds for low dosages.
    [Show full text]
  • The Early History of Medical Genetics in Canada William Leeming OCAD University [email protected]
    OCAD University Open Research Repository Faculty of Liberal Arts & Sciences and School of Interdisciplinary Studies 2004 The Early History of Medical Genetics in Canada William Leeming OCAD University [email protected] © Oxford University Press. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here for your personal use. Not for redistribution. Original source at DOI: 10.1093/shm/17.3.481. Recommended citation: Leeming, W. “The Early History of Medical Genetics in Canada.” Social History of Medicine 17.3 (2004): 481–500. Web. Leeming, W. (2004). The early history of medical genetics in Canada. Social History of Medicine, 17(3), 481-500. Pre-Publication Draft The Early History of Medical Genetics in Canada Abstract: This article shows that the intellectual and specialist movements that supported the growth of medical genetics in Canada between 1947 and 1990 were emergent phenomena, created, split, and reattached to different groups of actors, and reconfigured numerous times over the course of four decades. In each instance, new kinds of working relationships appeared; sets of diverse actors in local university- hospital settings coalesced into a new collectivity; and, as a collectivity, actors defined and/or redefined occupational roles and work rules. In its beginnings, medical genetics appears to be the object of a serious institutional manoeuver: a movement in support of the creation of examining and teaching positions in human genetics in North American medical schools. With time, the institutionalization of ‘medical genetics’ took hold, spurred on by changes in the rate and direction of service delivery associated with genetic consultation and laboratory services in clinical settings.
    [Show full text]
  • A Correlation of Cytological and Genetical Crossing-Over in Zea Mays. PNAS 17:492–497
    A CORRELATION OF CYTOLOGICAL AND GENETICAL CROSSING-OVER IN ZEA MAYS HARRIET B. CREIGHTON BARBARA MCCLINTOCK Botany Department Cornell University Ithaca, New York Creighton, H., and McClintock, B. 1931 A correlation of cytological and genetical crossing-over in Zea mays. PNAS 17:492–497. E S P Electronic Scholarly Publishing http://www.esp.org Electronic Scholarly Publishing Project Foundations Series –– Classical Genetics Series Editor: Robert J. Robbins The ESP Foundations of Classical Genetics project has received support from the ELSI component of the United States Department of Energy Human Genome Project. ESP also welcomes help from volunteers and collaborators, who recommend works for publication, provide access to original materials, and assist with technical and production work. If you are interested in volunteering, or are otherwise interested in the project, contact the series editor: [email protected]. Bibliographical Note This ESP edition, first electronically published in 2003 and subsequently revised in 2018, is a newly typeset, unabridged version, based on the 1931 edition published by The National Academy of Sciences. Unless explicitly noted, all footnotes and endnotes are as they appeared in the original work. Some of the graphics have been redone for this electronic version. Production Credits Scanning of originals: ESP staff OCRing of originals: ESP staff Typesetting: ESP staff Proofreading/Copyediting: ESP staff Graphics work: ESP staff Copyfitting/Final production: ESP staff © 2003, 2018 Electronic Scholarly Publishing Project http://www.esp.org This electronic edition is made freely available for educational or scholarly purposes, provided that this copyright notice is included. The manuscript may not be reprinted or redistributed for commercial purposes without permission.
    [Show full text]
  • LSU WIS October 2016 Newsletter
    Volume 1 | Issue 2 LSU Women in Science Oct. 31st, 2016 Thank you to everyone who attended our first meeting of the semester at the beginning of October! For those of you who couldn’t make it: We had a great conversation about the importance of women role models and mentors in positions of leadership and how that influences our own path in science. We are excited about the enthusiam and direction of LSU Women in Science and look forward to seeing you all at our next meeting! -Your LSU WIS Leadership Team The next meeting will be open to everyone. Come as you are and bring anyone you want. It doesn't matter if you're male, female, neutral, trans, gay, straight, black, white, brown, or purple, if you love science and want to be part of the conversation, join us! Fall 2016 meetings Meetings will be the first Tuesday of the month at 5pm! The December meeting will be a social – More information will be announced in the coming weeks! NEXT MEETING Tuesday Nov 1st @ 5pm Renewable and Natural “Life is not easy for any of Resources Building Rm 141 us. But what of that? We must have perseverance and above all confidence in ourselves. We must believe that we are gifted for something and that this thing must be attained.” – Marie Curie Contact us Kelcee Smith [email protected] Cassandra Skaggs [email protected] Julie Butler [email protected] Amie Settlecowski [email protected] WOMEN IN SCIENCE OCTOBER NEWSLETER 1 Perception of Women in Science: #distractinglysexy By Cassandra Skaggs Many of us recall the #distractinglysexy social media explosion that occurred in 2015 over Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Nature Medicine Essay
    COMMENTARY LASKER BASIC MEDICAL RESEARCH AWARD Of maize and men, or peas and people: case histories to justify plants and other model systems David Baulcombe One of the byproducts of molecular biology cork is altogether filled with air, and that air is has been support for the ‘model system’ con- perfectly enclosed in little boxes or cells distinct cept. All living organisms are based on the same from one another.”)2 (Fig. 1). Two hundred fifty genetic code, they have similar subcellular years later, Beijerinck discovered a contagium structures and they use homologous metabolic vivum fluidum in extracts of diseased tobacco pathways. So, mechanisms can be investigated plants that he later referred to as a virus3. using organisms other than those in which In contemporary science, a green alga— the knowledge will be exploited for practical Chlamydomonas reinhardtii—is a useful model benefit. Model systems are particularly use- in the analysis of kidney disease4. However, ful in the early discovery phase of a scientific in this article, I refer to the contribution of endeavor, and recent progress in biomedical plant biology to a family of mechanisms that I science has fully vindicated their use. Jacques refer to as RNA silencing. This topic has been Monod, for example, famously justified his reviewed comprehensively elsewhere5,6, so here work on a bacterial model system by stating I focus on personal experience and my view of that “what is true for Escherichia coli is also future potential from this work. true for elephants.” My fellow laureates, Victor Ambros and Gary Ruvkun, can defend the use The early history of RNA silencing in of the worm Caenorhabditis elegans as a good plants model system and so I will focus on plants.
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 President's Essay
    from the 2002 Annual Report DIRECTOR’S REPORT Much has been written about the extraordinary events that took place in Cambridge, Eng - land, 50 years ago that changed biology forever. The discovery of the double-helical struc - ture of DNA ushered in an immediate future for understanding how genes are inherited, how genetic information is read, and how mutations are fixed in our genome. 2003 will ap - propriately celebrate the discovery and the stunning developments that have occurred since, not only in biology and medicine, but also in fields unanticipated by Jim Watson and Francis Crick when they proposed the double helix. DNA-based forensics is but one example, having an impact in the law to such an extent that some states are now reviewing whether capital punishment should be continued because of the possibility of irreversibly condemning the innocent. In all the writings and lore about the double-helix discovery, one of the little discussed points that struck me was the freedom that both Jim and Francis had to pursue what they felt was important, namely, the structure of DNA. Having completed graduate studies in the United States, Jim Watson went to Copenhagen to continue to become a biochemist in the hope that he might understand the gene, but he soon realized that biochemistry was not his forte. Most importantly, after hearing Maurice Wilkins talk about his early structural studies on DNA, Jim had the foresight that understanding DNA structure might help un - derstand the gene and therefore he decided to move to Cambridge, then, as now, a center of the field now known as structural biology.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction and Historical Perspective
    Chapter 1 Introduction and Historical Perspective “ Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. ” modified by the developmental history of the organism, Theodosius Dobzhansky its physiology – from cellular to systems levels – and by the social and physical environment. Finally, behaviors are shaped through evolutionary forces of natural selection OVERVIEW that optimize survival and reproduction ( Figure 1.1 ). Truly, the study of behavior provides us with a window through Behavioral genetics aims to understand the genetic which we can view much of biology. mechanisms that enable the nervous system to direct Understanding behaviors requires a multidisciplinary appropriate interactions between organisms and their perspective, with regulation of gene expression at its core. social and physical environments. Early scientific The emerging field of behavioral genetics is still taking explorations of animal behavior defined the fields shape and its boundaries are still being defined. Behavioral of experimental psychology and classical ethology. genetics has evolved through the merger of experimental Behavioral genetics has emerged as an interdisciplin- psychology and classical ethology with evolutionary biol- ary science at the interface of experimental psychology, ogy and genetics, and also incorporates aspects of neuro- classical ethology, genetics, and neuroscience. This science ( Figure 1.2 ). To gain a perspective on the current chapter provides a brief overview of the emergence of definition of this field, it is helpful
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of DNA Technology 1865 - Gregor Mendel the Father of Genetics
    A Short History of DNA Technology 1865 - Gregor Mendel The Father of Genetics The Augustinian monastery in old Brno, Moravia 1865 - Gregor Mendel • Law of Segregation • Law of Independent Assortment • Law of Dominance 1865 1915 - T.H. Morgan Genetics of Drosophila • Short generation time • Easy to maintain • Only 4 pairs of chromosomes 1865 1915 - T.H. Morgan •Genes located on chromosomes •Sex-linked inheritance wild type mutant •Gene linkage 0 •Recombination long aristae short aristae •Genetic mapping gray black body 48.5 body (cross-over maps) 57.5 red eyes cinnabar eyes 67.0 normal wings vestigial wings 104.5 red eyes brown eyes 1865 1928 - Frederick Griffith “Rough” colonies “Smooth” colonies Transformation of Streptococcus pneumoniae Living Living Heat killed Heat killed S cells mixed S cells R cells S cells with living R cells capsule Living S cells in blood Bacterial sample from dead mouse Strain Injection Results 1865 Beadle & Tatum - 1941 One Gene - One Enzyme Hypothesis Neurospora crassa Ascus Ascospores placed X-rays Fruiting on complete body medium All grow Minimal + amino acids No growth Minimal Minimal + vitamins in mutants Fragments placed on minimal medium Minimal plus: Mutant deficient in enzyme that synthesizes arginine Cys Glu Arg Lys His 1865 Beadle & Tatum - 1941 Gene A Gene B Gene C Minimal Medium + Citruline + Arginine + Ornithine Wild type PrecursorEnz A OrnithineEnz B CitrulineEnz C Arginine Metabolic block Class I Precursor OrnithineEnz B CitrulineEnz C Arginine Mutants Class II Mutants PrecursorEnz A Ornithine
    [Show full text]
  • Barbara Mcclintock's World
    Barbara McClintock’s World Timeline adapted from Dolan DNA Learning Center exhibition 1902-1908 Barbara McClintock is born in Hartford, Connecticut, the third of four children of Sarah and Thomas Henry McClintock, a physician. She spends periods of her childhood in Massachusetts with her paternal aunt and uncle. Barbara at about age five. This prim and proper picture betrays the fact that she was, in fact, a self-reliant tomboy. Barbara’s individualism and self-sufficiency was apparent even in infancy. When Barbara was four months old, her parents changed her birth name, Eleanor, which they considered too delicate and feminine for such a rugged child. In grade school, Barbara persuaded her mother to have matching bloomers (shorts) made for her dresses – so she could more easily join her brother Tom in tree climbing, baseball, volleyball, My father tells me that at the and football. age of five I asked for a set of tools. He My mother used to did not get me the tools that you get for an adult; he put a pillow on the floor and give got me tools that would fit in my hands, and I didn’t me one toy and just leave me there. think they were adequate. Though I didn’t want to tell She said I didn’t cry, didn’t call for him that, they were not the tools I wanted. I wanted anything. real tools not tools for children. 1908-1918 McClintock’s family moves to Brooklyn in 1908, where she attends elementary and secondary school. In 1918, she graduates one semester early from Erasmus Hall High School in Brooklyn.
    [Show full text]
  • I. Hox Genes 2
    School ofMedicine Oregon Health Sciences University CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL This is certify that the Ph.D. thesis of WendyKnosp has been approved Mentor/ Advisor ~ Member Member QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF HOXA13 FUNCTION IN THE DEVELOPING LIMB By Wendy M. lt<nosp A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics and the Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES iv LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS X ABSTRACT xii CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 I. Hox genes 2 A. Discovery of Hox genes in Drosophila melanogaster 2 B. Hox cluster colinearity and conservation 7 C. Human Hox mutations 9 D. Hoxa13: HFGS and Guttmacher syndromes 10 II. The Homeodomain 12 A. Homeodomain structure 12 B. DNA binding 14 Ill. Limb development 16 A. Patterning of the limb axes 16 B. Digit formation 20 C. lnterdigital programmed cell death 21 IV. BMPs and limb development 23 A. BMP signaling in the limb 23 B. BMP target genes 27 V. Hoxa13 and embryonic development 30 A. The Hoxa13-GFP mouse model 30 B. Hoxa13 mutant phenotypes 34 C. HOXA 13 homeodomain 35 D. HOXA 13 protein-protein interactions 36 E. HOXA 13 target genes 37 VI. Hypothesis and Rationale 39 CHAPTER 2: HOXA13 regulates Bmp2 and Bmp7 40 I. Abstract 42 II. Introduction 43 Ill. Results 46 IV. Discussion 69 v. Materials and Methods 75 VI. Acknowledgements 83 11 CHAPTER 3: Quantitative analysis of HOXA13 function 84 HOXA 13 regulation of Sostdc1 I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Population Problem Inherited Evolutio
    2000 Earthlearningidea - http://www.earthlearningidea.com/ top edge of Sorting out the evolution of evolution headlines page Lay out your own timeline of how the theory of evolution developed Cut off the left hand edge of these four Earthlearningidea sheets and stick them together to form a timeline. Then stick it down on a bench or table. The ‘Evolution of evolution’ timeline Cut out the milestone boxes in the evolution of evolutionary theory below into strips. Leave the dates attached for less able pupils, but remove them for the more able. Then invite the pupils to sort out the headlines 1975 and place them in the correct places on the timeline – to show how evolutionary theory Photo: Chris King evolved. Species static This image is in the public The early part of the bible is interpreted to show that domain because species are static and there is no evolution. The date of its copyright has expired. 1650 creation of all species is calculated by Archbishop Ussher as 4004BC. Archbishop Ussher Evolution – but how? This image is in the public Early evolutionary ideas are presented by natural domain because 1740 philosophers, Pierre Maupertuis and Erasmus Darwin. its copyright has - expired. 1796 1950 Pierre Maupertuis The population problem This image is in the public Thomas Malthus publishes his idea that populations domain because increase geometrically (2,4,16) whilst food production its copyright has 1798 only increases arithmetically (2,3,4) so there must be expired. population crashes. Thomas Malthus Inherited evolution Permission is granted to copy, Jean-Baptiste Lamarck develops his evolutionary theory distribute and/or – that evolution occurs because offspring change in modify this document under 1800 response to the environment, and these changes are the terms of the inherited from their parents (later shown to be 1925 GNU Free incorrect).
    [Show full text]
  • Barbara Mcclintock
    Barbara McClintock Lee B. Kass and Paul Chomet Abstract Barbara McClintock, pioneering plant geneticist and winner of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1983, is best known for her discovery of transposable genetic elements in corn. This chapter provides an overview of many of her key findings, some of which have been outlined and described elsewhere. We also provide a new look at McClintock’s early contributions, based on our readings of her primary publications and documents found in archives. We expect the reader will gain insight and appreciation for Barbara McClintock’s unique perspective, elegant experiments and unprecedented scientific achievements. 1 Introduction This chapter is focused on the scientific contributions of Barbara McClintock, pioneering plant geneticist and winner of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1983 for her discovery of transposable genetic elements in corn. Her enlightening experiments and discoveries have been outlined and described in a number of papers and books, so it is not the aim of this report to detail each step in her scientific career and personal life but rather highlight many of her key findings, then refer the reader to the original reports and more detailed reviews. We hope the reader will gain insight and appreciation for Barbara McClintock’s unique perspective, elegant experiments and unprecedented scientific achievements. Barbara McClintock (1902–1992) was born in Hartford Connecticut and raised in Brooklyn, New York (Keller 1983). She received her undergraduate and graduate education at the New York State College of Agriculture at Cornell University. In 1923, McClintock was awarded the B.S.
    [Show full text]