Elements of Genetics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Elements of Genetics GENETICS AND PLANT BREEDING Elements of Genetics Dr. B. M. Prasanna National Fellow Division of Genetics Indian Agricultural Research Institute New Delhi-110012 (12-06- 2007) CONTENTS Introduction History Cell Cell Division Special Chromosomes Dominance Relationships Gene Interactions Multiple Alleles Sex Determination Sex Linkage Linkage and Crossing Over Genetic Mapping Structural Changes in Chromosomes Numerical Changes in Chromosomes Nature of the Genetic Material Gene Regulation Operon Concept Gene Concept Mutation Polygenic and Quantitative Inheritance Extrachromosomal Inheritance Plant Tissue Culture Keywords Mitosis, Meiosis 1 Introduction In biology, heredity is the passing on of characteristics from one generation to the next. It is the reason why offspring look like their parents. It also explains why cats always give birth to kittens and never puppies. The process of heredity occurs among all living organisms, including animals, plants, bacteria, protists and fungi. Genetic variation refers to the variation in a population or species. Genetics is the study of heredity and variation in living organisms. Two research approaches were historically important in helping investigators understand the biological basis of heredity. The first of these approaches, ‘transmission genetics’, involved crossing organisms and studying the offsprings' traits to develop hypotheses about the mechanisms of inheritance. The second approach involved using cytological techniques to study the machinery and processes of cellular reproduction. This approach laid a solid foundation for the more conceptual understanding of inheritance that developed as a result of transmission genetics. Ever since 1970s, with the advent of molecular tools and techniques, geneticists are able to intensively analyze genetic basis of trait variation in various organisms, including plants, animals and humans. History Pre-Mendelian and Post-Mendelian Concepts of Heredity It was apparent to ancient humans that offspring resembled their parents. The Greek philosophers had a variety of ideas about heredity: Theophrastus proposed that male flowers caused female flowers to ripen; Hippocrates speculated that "seeds" were produced by various body parts and transmitted to offspring at the time of conception, and Aristotle thought that male and female semen mixed at conception. Aeschylus, in 458 BC, proposed the male as the parent, with the female as a "nurse for the young life sown within her". Various hereditary mechanisms were envisaged without being properly tested or quantified. These included “blending inheritance” and the “inheritance of acquired traits”. Nevertheless, people were able to develop domestic breeds of animals as well as crops through artificial selection. During the 1700s, Dutch microscopist Anton van Leeuwenhoek (1632-1723) discovered "animalcules" in the sperm of humans and other animals. Some scientists speculated they saw a "little man" (homunculus) inside each sperm. These scientists formed a school of thought known as the "spermists". They contended the only contributions of the female to the next generation were the womb in which the homunculus grew, and prenatal influences of the womb. An opposing school of thought, the “ovists”, believed that the future human was in the egg, and that sperm merely stimulated the growth of the egg. Ovists thought women carried eggs containing boy and girl children, and that the gender of the offspring was determined well before conception. “Pangenesis” was an idea that males and females formed "pangenes" in every organ. These pangenes subsequently moved through their blood to the genitals and then to the children. The concept originated with the ancient Greeks and influenced biology until little over 100 years ago. The terms "blood relative", "full-blooded", and "royal blood" are relics of pangenesis. Francis Galton, Charles Darwin's cousin, experimentally tested and disproved pangenesis during the 1870s. 2 Charles Darwin proposed a theory of evolution in 1859 and one of its major problems was the lack of an underlying mechanism for heredity. Darwin believed in a mix of blending inheritance and the inheritance of acquired traits (pangenesis). Blending inheritance would lead to uniformity across populations in only a few generations and thus would remove variation from a population on which natural selection could act. Darwin's initial model of heredity was adopted by, and then heavily modified by Francis Galton, who laid the framework for the biometric school of heredity. Galton rejected the aspects of Darwin's pangenesis model which relied on acquired traits. The inheritance of acquired traits was shown to have little basis in the 1880s when August Weismann cut the tails off many generations of mice to find that their offspring did continue to develop tails. The idea of particulate inheritance of genes can be attributed to Gregor Mendel who presented his work on pea plants in 1865. The year 1900 gave birth to a new discipline that soon came to be called ‘genetics’. During that year, three botanists, Hugo de Vries, Carl Correns, and Erich Tschermak, reported on their breeding experiments of the late 1890s and claimed to have confirmed the regularities in the transmission of characters from parents to offspring that Mendel had already presented in his seminal paper of 1865. The additional observation that sometimes several elements behaved as if they were linked, contributed to the assumption soon promoted by Walter Sutton and Theodor Boveri that these elements were located in groups on the different chromosomes of the nucleus. Thus, the ‘chromosome theory of inheritance’ was proposed. Toward the end of the first decade of the 20th century, after Bateson had coined the term genetics for the emerging new field of transmission studies in 1906, Wilhelm Johannsen codified this distinction by introducing the notions of genotype and phenotype, respectively. In addition, for the elements of the genotype, he proposed the notion of gene. This terminology was gradually taken up by the genetics community. By the early 1900s, cytologists had demonstrated that heredity is the consequence of the genetic continuity of cells by cell division, had identified the gametes as the vehicles that transmit genetic information from one generation to another, and had collected strong evidence for the central role of the nucleus and the chromosomes in heredity. It was initially assumed the Mendelian inheritance only accounted for large (qualitative) differences, such as those seen by Mendel in his pea plants — and the idea of additive effect of (quantitative) genes was not realized until R.A. Fisher's (1918) classic paper on The Correlation Between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance. In the 1930s, work by Fisher and others resulted in a combination of Mendelian and biometric schools into the modern synthesis of evolution. From the early 1910s right into the 1930s, the growing community of researchers around Thomas Hunt Morgan used mutants of the fruit fly Drosophila, constructed in ever more sophisticated ways, in order to produce a map of the fruit fly’s genotype in which genes, and alleles thereof, figured as genetic markers occupying a particular locus on one of the four homologous chromosome pairs of the fly. Meanwhile, cytological work added credence to the materiality of genes-on-chromosomes. 3 In 1941, George Beadle and Edward Tatum showed that mutations in genes caused errors in certain steps in metabolic pathways. This showed that specific genes code for specific proteins, leading to the "one gene-one enzyme" hypothesis. Oswald Avery, Collin Macleod, and Maclyn McCarty showed in 1944 that DNA holds the gene's information. In 1953, James D. Watson and Francis Crick demonstrated the molecular structure of DNA, the genetic material in all organisms, except some viruses. Mendelian Principles of Heredity The principles of inheritance were derived by a 19th century monk, Gregor Johann Mendel (born in Moravia, which was then a part of Austria, and now in Czeck Republic), who conducted plant hybridization experiments in his monastery. Between 1856 and 1863, he cultivated and tested some 28,000 garden pea (Pisum sativum) plants. His experiments brought forth two generalizations which later were known as Mendel’s principles of heredity or Mendelian inheritance. These were described in his essay "Experiments on Plant Hybridization" that was read to the Natural History Society of Brunn on February 8 and March 8, 1865, and was published in 1866. Gregor Mendel is now regarded as the ‘Father of Genetics’, as he introduced a new formal tool for the analysis of heredity and variation in organisms, initiated the hybridization experiments that were based on a new experimental regime: the selection of discrete character pairs. His findings allowed other scientists to simplify the emergence of traits to mathematical probability. A large portion of Mendel's findings can be traced to his choice to start his experiments only with true breeding plants. He measured only absolute characteristics such as colour, shape, and Gregor Mendel and the first page of his classical position of the offspring. His data was paper expressed numerically and subjected to statistical analysis. This method of data reporting and the large sampling size he used gave credibility to his data. He also had the foresight to look through several successive generations of his pea plants and record their variations. Without his careful attention to procedure
Recommended publications
  • The Early History of Medical Genetics in Canada William Leeming OCAD University [email protected]
    OCAD University Open Research Repository Faculty of Liberal Arts & Sciences and School of Interdisciplinary Studies 2004 The Early History of Medical Genetics in Canada William Leeming OCAD University [email protected] © Oxford University Press. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here for your personal use. Not for redistribution. Original source at DOI: 10.1093/shm/17.3.481. Recommended citation: Leeming, W. “The Early History of Medical Genetics in Canada.” Social History of Medicine 17.3 (2004): 481–500. Web. Leeming, W. (2004). The early history of medical genetics in Canada. Social History of Medicine, 17(3), 481-500. Pre-Publication Draft The Early History of Medical Genetics in Canada Abstract: This article shows that the intellectual and specialist movements that supported the growth of medical genetics in Canada between 1947 and 1990 were emergent phenomena, created, split, and reattached to different groups of actors, and reconfigured numerous times over the course of four decades. In each instance, new kinds of working relationships appeared; sets of diverse actors in local university- hospital settings coalesced into a new collectivity; and, as a collectivity, actors defined and/or redefined occupational roles and work rules. In its beginnings, medical genetics appears to be the object of a serious institutional manoeuver: a movement in support of the creation of examining and teaching positions in human genetics in North American medical schools. With time, the institutionalization of ‘medical genetics’ took hold, spurred on by changes in the rate and direction of service delivery associated with genetic consultation and laboratory services in clinical settings.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Genetics
    A Brief History of Genetics A Brief History of Genetics By Chris Rider A Brief History of Genetics By Chris Rider This book first published 2020 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2020 by Chris Rider All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-5885-1 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-5885-4 Cover A cartoon of the double-stranded helix structure of DNA overlies the sequence of the gene encoding the A protein chain of human haemoglobin. Top left is a portrait of Gregor Mendel, the founding father of genetics, and bottom right is a portrait of Thomas Hunt Morgan, the first winner of a Nobel Prize for genetics. To my wife for her many years of love, support, patience and sound advice TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures.......................................................................................... viii List of Text Boxes and Tables .................................................................... x Foreword .................................................................................................. xi Acknowledgements ................................................................................. xiii Chapter 1 ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Third Base
    Appendix The Third Base Donald Forsdyke If I thought that by learning more and more I should ever arrive at the knowledge of absolute truth, I would leave off studying. But I believe I am pretty safe. Samuel Butler, Notebooks Darwin’s mentor, the geologist Charles Lyell, and Darwin himself, both con- sidered the relationship between the evolution of biological species and the evolution of languages [1]. But neither took the subject to the deep informa- tional level of Butler and Hering. In the twentieth century the emergence of a new science – Evolutionary Bioinformatics (EB) – was heralded by two dis- coveries. First, that DNA – a linear polymer of four base units – was the chromosomal component conveying hereditary information. Second, that much of this information was “a phenomenon of arrangement” – determined by the sequence of the four bases. We conclude with a brief sketch of the new work as it relates to William Bateson’s evolutionary ideas. However, imbued with true Batesonian caution (“I will believe when I must”), it is relegated to an Appendix to indicate its provisional nature. Modern languages have similarities that indicate branching evolution from common ancestral languages [2]. We recognize early variations within a language as dialects or accents. When accents are incompatible, communi- cation is impaired. As accents get more disparate, mutual comprehension de- creases and at some point, when comprehension is largely lost, we declare that there are two languages where there was initially one. The origin of lan- guage begins with differences in accent. If we understand how differences in accent arise, then we may come to understand something fundamental about the origin of language (and hence of a text written in that language).
    [Show full text]
  • Chromosomes in the Clinic: the Visual Localization and Analysis of Genetic Disease in the Human Genome
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2013 Chromosomes in the Clinic: The Visual Localization and Analysis of Genetic Disease in the Human Genome Andrew Joseph Hogan University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons Recommended Citation Hogan, Andrew Joseph, "Chromosomes in the Clinic: The Visual Localization and Analysis of Genetic Disease in the Human Genome" (2013). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 873. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/873 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/873 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Chromosomes in the Clinic: The Visual Localization and Analysis of Genetic Disease in the Human Genome Abstract This dissertation examines the visual cultures of postwar biomedicine, with a particular focus on how various techniques, conventions, and professional norms have shaped the `look', classification, diagnosis, and understanding of genetic diseases. Many scholars have previously highlighted the `informational' approaches of postwar genetics, which treat the human genome as an expansive data set comprised of three billion DNA nucleotides. Since the 1950s however, clinicians and genetics researchers have largely interacted with the human genome at the microscopically visible level of chromosomes. Mindful of this, my dissertation examines
    [Show full text]
  • INTRODUCTION to GENETICS Table of Contents Heredity, Historical
    INTRODUCTION TO GENETICS Table of Contents Heredity, historical perspectives | The Monk and his peas | Principle of segregation Dihybrid Crosses | Mutations | Genetic Terms | Links Heredity, Historical Perspective | Back to Top For much of human history people were unaware of the scientific details of how babies were conceived and how heredity worked. Clearly they were conceived, and clearly there was some hereditary connection between parents and children, but the mechanisms were not readily apparent. The Greek philosophers had a variety of ideas: Theophrastus proposed that male flowers caused female flowers to ripen; Hippocrates speculated that "seeds" were produced by various body parts and transmitted to offspring at the time of conception, and Aristotle thought that male and female semen mixed at conception. Aeschylus, in 458 BC, proposed the male as the parent, with the female as a "nurse for the young life sown within her". During the 1700s, Dutch microscopist Anton van Leeuwenhoek (1632-1723) discovered "animalcules" in the sperm of humans and other animals. Some scientists speculated they saw a "little man" (homunculus) inside each sperm. These scientists formed a school of thought known as the "spermists". They contended the only contributions of the female to the next generation were the womb in which the homunculus grew, and prenatal influences of the womb. An opposing school of thought, the ovists, believed that the future human was in the egg, and that sperm merely stimulated the growth of the egg. Ovists thought women carried eggs containing boy and girl children, and that the gender of the offspring was determined well before conception.
    [Show full text]
  • Mendel's Opposition to Evolution and to Darwin
    Mendel's Opposition to Evolution and to Darwin B. E. Bishop Although the past decade or so has seen a resurgence of interest in Mendel's role in the origin of genetic theory, only one writer, L. A. Callender (1988), has concluded that Mendel was opposed to evolution. Yet careful scrutiny of Mendel's Pisum pa- per, published in 1866, and of the time and circumstances in which it appeared suggests not only that It Is antievolutlonary In content, but also that it was specif- ically written in contradiction of Darwin's book The Origin of Species, published in 1859, and that Mendel's and Darwin's theories, the two theories which were united in the 1940s to form the modern synthesis, are completely antithetical. Mendel does not mention Darwin in his Pi- [Mendel] in so far as they bore on his anal- sum paper (although he does in his letters ysis of the evolutionary role of hybrids." to Nlgeli, the famous Swiss botanist with Olby's (1979) article, entitled "Mendel whom he initiated a correspondence, and No Mendelian?," led to a number of revi- in his Hieracium paper, published In 1870), sionist views of Mendel's work and his in- but he states unambiguously in his intro- tentions, although no agreement has been duction that his objective is to contribute reached. For instance, some writers, un- to the evolution controversy raging at the like de Beer, Olby, and Callender, overlook time: "It requires a good deal of courage or minimize the evolutionary significance indeed to undertake such a far-reaching of Mendel's paper, while others maintain task; however, this seems to be the one that Mendel had little or no interest in he- correct way of finally reaching the solu- redity, an interpretation that has been op- tion to a question whose significance for posed by Hartl and Orel (1992): "We con- the evolutionary history of organic forms clude that Mendel understood very clearly must not be underestimated" (Mendel what his experiments meant for heredity." 1866).
    [Show full text]
  • Microdissection and Molecular Cloning of Extra Small Ring Chromosomes Of
    'r¡o "to. Q8 MICRODISSECTION AND MOLECULAR CLONING oFEXTRASMALLRINGCHROMOSOMESoF HUMAN by Yu-Yan Fang (MBBS) Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of PhilosoPhY I)epartment of Paediatrics School of Medicine The University of Adelaide Australia January, 1998 t: i.t Errata for Thesis of Yu-Yan Fang Pnge 6,line 5-6 delete "ancl they are chromosome." Pngc 79, Parngrnph 2 replace " 0.65-7.5ol,ro wit\ " 0.065-0.75%" replace " 0 .'1, -0 .7 2ol,¡o with " 0.07 -0.07 2yo " replace " 6"/rro with 0.6%" Pnge 55, Pnrngrøph 2,line 6 replace "since they also mapped to CY720" with the phrase "sir-ì.ce they mapped to C{770 but not CY120" Pnge 55, Pnragrnph 2, line 10 replace "The other three clones (y42,Y73 and Y87) were negative for CY120 ..." with "The other three clones were positive for CY120 and CYI70 (Fig. Z-4). .." Pnge 56,line 6-7 replace "cosmid 776F7" with "cosmid177C6" Pnge 56,line 10 repiace "cosmid 177C6" with "cosmid176F1" Pnge 57,Tnble 3-3 In this table replace the cosmids labelled 177C6 and176F1with176F1 and 177C6 lespectively. Fig.3-6 At pter, replace "177C6" witln"176F1" At 4q12, replace "\76F1." with"177C6" Pnge 65,Iine 2 replace "FIis" with "F{er" Fig.4-10 replace "devision" with "division" Pnge 73, line 7 replace "since FISH study showed ..." with "since FISH study with the probe in the region of LScen-+qllclearly showed defined euchromatic region between the two FISH signals, and on the basis of the abnormal phenotype in this patient it is also suggested that the PWS/AS region was involved in this marker." u TABLE OF CONTEI\TS Chapter 1 Intrõduction and literature review.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Genetics Book Collection Catalogue
    History of Genetics Book Collection Catalogue Below is a list of the History of Genetics Book Collection held at the John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK. For all enquires please contact Mike Ambrose [email protected] +44(0)1603 450630 Collection List Symposium der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Hygiene und Mikrobiologie Stuttgart Gustav Fischer 1978 A69516944 BOOK-HG HG œ.00 15/10/1996 5th international congress on tropical agriculture 28-31 July 1930 Brussels Imprimerie Industrielle et Finangiere 1930 A6645004483 œ.00 30/3/1994 7th International Chromosome Conference Oxford Oxford 1980 A32887511 BOOK-HG HG œ.00 20/2/1991 7th International Chromosome Conference Oxford Oxford 1980 A44688257 BOOK-HG HG œ.00 26/6/1992 17th international agricultural congress 1937 1937 A6646004482 œ.00 30/3/1994 19th century science a selection of original texts 155111165910402 œ14.95 13/2/2001 150 years of the State Nikitsky Botanical Garden bollection of scientific papers. vol.37 Moscow "Kolos" 1964 A41781244 BOOK-HG HG œ.00 15/10/1996 Haldane John Burdon Sanderson 1892-1964 A banned broadcast and other essays London Chatto and Windus 1946 A10697655 BOOK-HG HG œ.00 15/10/1996 Matsuura Hajime A bibliographical monograph on plant genetics (genic analysis) 1900-1929 Sapporo Hokkaido Imperial University 1933 A47059786 BOOK-HG HG œ.00 15/10/1996 Hoppe Alfred John A bibliography of the writings of Samuel Butler (author of "erewhon") and of writings about him with some letters from Samuel Butler to the Rev. F. G. Fleay, now first published London The Bookman's Journal
    [Show full text]
  • History of Genetics How Did We Get Here?
    History of Genetics How did we get here? Honors Genetics Lemon Bay High School Ms. Susan Chabot Chapter Concepts • Genetics in the 21st century is built on a rich tradition of discovery and experimentation stretching from the ancient world through the 19th century to the present day. • Transmission genetics is the general process by which traits controlled by genes are transmitted through gametes from generation to generation. • Mutant strains can be used in genetic crosses to map the location and distance between genes on chromosomes. • The Watson-Crick model of DNA explains how genetic information is stored and expressed. This is the foundation of molecular genetics. Chapter Concepts • Recombinant DNA technology revolutionized genetics, was the foundation for the Human Genome Project, and generated new fields that combine genetics with information tech. • Biotechnology provides genetically modified organisms and their products that are used across a wide range of fields including agriculture, medicine, and industry. • Model organisms used in genetics research are now utilized in combination with recombinant DNA technology and genomics to study human disease. • Genetic technology is developing faster than the policies, laws, and conventions that govern its use. Part 1 Genetics Has a Rich and Interesting History • Domestication (8000 – 1000 BC) • Plants • Animals • Genetic variants from wild populations • Selective breeding • Hippocratic School of Medicine (500 – 400 BC) • On the Seed Humors contained the “bearers of hereditary traits”
    [Show full text]
  • Burchgene ISSUE 01
    URCH ENE BSemestral magazine of Genetics andG Bioengineering Department ISSUE 01/MAY 2016 FORENSIC GENETICS ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE NEUROSCIENCE GENE THERAPY Genetics for CSI Question??? A Love Story Disease treatment? Great introduction in forensic Is Alzheimer’s in your genes? Scientist from Harvard about Problems and Prospects of genetics on crime scene p.8 p.20 neuroscience and genetics p.16 Gene Therapy p.18 LEARN NEW THINGS ABOUT HISTORY OF GENETICS 2 History of Genetics Genetics is more than a “laboratory science”; unlike some other areas of science, because genetics has a direct impact on soci- ety. So what is genetics? We heard a lot of times that genetics is the scien- tific study of heredity, but like all defi- nitions, this leaves a lot unsaid. To be more specific, what geneticists do is study how traits (such as eye color and hair color) and diseases (such as cys- tic fibrosis and sickle cell anemia) are » p.8 passed from generation to generation . » p.18 BurchGene magazine Broaden your horizons Dear colleagues, students, respected professors, collabora- Executive editors: tors and respected readers. It is a great pleasure and honour to Ahmed Osmanović present to you the first ever student magazine „Burch Gene“, Adnan Fojnica here at our department for Genetics and Bioengineering. Editorial board: Finally, “Burch Gene” magazine saw the daylight. Our goal Prof. Dr. Damir Marjanović was to introduce students, professors and the public to the basic Prof. Dr. Mirsada Hukić ideas behind genetics and bioengineering. Introduce them with Assist. Prof. Dr. Almir Badnjević definitions, concepts, applications and benefits these branches Assist.
    [Show full text]
  • A Chronology of Genetics
    A CHRONOLOGY OF GENETICS ROBERT COOK, Editor, Journal of Heredity X HE science of genetics as of 1937 has a long and rather involved history, which has not proved easy to treat as a chronology. Made up as it has been of a fusion of diverse specialties which have developed at different rates, a simple chronological listing of discoveries and developments necessarily gives a rather fragmentary picture of the unfolding of the modern science of heredity. Various plans were considered to avoid this difficulty, but the most satisfactory treat- ment seemed to be to combine everything in one simple chronology, which branches out into occasional summary paragraphs to suggest, without prohibitive chronological detail, the recent developments, and to buttress this with a graphic genetic family tree to give visually the relations of the various main components that have gone to make our modern genetic organism. The difficulties that have been en- countered in determining many of the ''first discoveries'' noted in this chronology suggest that an exhaustive history of genetics will soon be necessary. Roberts and Zirkle have recently summarized the early publications on plant hj^bridization, but a connected stor^^ of the development of genetics as a whole remains to be written. The compiler takes this opportunity to acknowledge invaluable help and suggestions from a group of about 35 geneticists who gener- ously read and commented on a mimeographed first draft of this chronology. In the time allotted it would have been impossible without this freely given aid to have done nearly so complete a job as is here presented—which remains, it is regretfully reaUzed, even with this help, only a very rough sketch.
    [Show full text]
  • A Chronicle on Genetics and the March of Darwinian and Mendelian Medicine Diddahally R
    Govindaraju Evo Edu Outreach (2020) 13:15 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-020-00129-5 Evolution: Education and Outreach BOOK REVIEW Open Access A Chronicle on Genetics and the March of Darwinian and Mendelian Medicine Diddahally R. Govindaraju* Abstract Ken Burns, a well-known documentarian has produced a flm titled, “The Gene: An Intimate History” based on Sid- dhartha Mukherjee’s book by the same name. The flm focuses sharply on the history of genetics, the science of inheritance and variation, in particular, the gene, the central player in genetics, its discovery, structure and function as well as its myriad infuence on development, growth, health, disease and evolution of all organisms. Importantly, he has shown how geneticists, physicians, patients and their families as well as society at large must cooperate, develop mutual trust and share ethical responsibilities in order to predict, prevent, manage and cure many inherited disorders. Mr. Burns has reinforced these ideas beautifully with illustrations, archived flm footage, location flming and com- mentaries. The flm also hints at the need for taking a unifed Darwinian-Mendelian and Hippocratic approach toward building a healthier human society. In short, this is a beautiful and engrossing documentary on the future of Genetic Medicine. Keywords: Ken Burns, Siddhartha Mukherjee, Garrod, Genetic disorders, Huntington disease, Precision medicine, Genome editing, Genetic medicine Details of the documentary flm euphoria about genetic research, toward predicting, pre- Burns, K. Te Gene: An intimate history presented in venting and potentially curing inherited disorders, being two parts on April 7, and April 14, 2020 on PBS. popularized as precision medicine.
    [Show full text]