DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Historic Preservation Design Guidelines

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Frederick County Register of Historic Places DESIGN GUIDELINES THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FREDERICK COUNTY REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES DESIGN GUIDELINES Table of Contents 2021 EDITION Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................... i Chapter 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 A. Background ...........................................................................................................................................1 B. Organization of Guidelines ...............................................................................................................2 C. Jurisdiction ...........................................................................................................................................2 D. Historic Districts ..................................................................................................................................2 E. Codes and Permitting ..........................................................................................................................3 F. Historic Preservation Tax Credits .....................................................................................................4 Chapter 2. Prehistory and Historical Overview of Frederick County ................................... 13 A. Prehistoric Overview ........................................................................................................................ 13 B. Historical Overview of Frederick County .................................................................................... 22 Chapter 3. Setting and Site ....................................................................................................33 A. Setting ................................................................................................................................................. 33 B. Site ....................................................................................................................................................... 36 Chapter 4. Building Exteriors ................................................................................................37 A. Massing, Scale, Proportion, Order, Rhythm ............................................................................... 37 B. Roofs .................................................................................................................................................. 39 C. Openings ........................................................................................................................................... 48 D. Storefronts ......................................................................................................................................... 56 E. Exterior Walls ................................................................................................................................... 58 F. Porches .............................................................................................................................................. 68 Chapter 5. Landscape and Site Features ............................................................................... 71 A. Vernacular and Designed Landscapes ........................................................................................... 71 B. Major Categories of Landscapes .................................................................................................... 72 C. Landscape Character ........................................................................................................................ 74 D. Landscape Features and Materials .................................................................................................. 74 Chapter 6. Ancillary Structures .............................................................................................. 81 A. Residential Ancillary Structures ...................................................................................................... 81 B. Agricultural and Industrial Ancillary Structures .......................................................................... 81 C. Recommendations for Ancillary Structures ................................................................................ 82 Chapter 7. Additions and New Construction ........................................................................85 A. Additions ............................................................................................................................................ 85 B. Site Design in Towns and Villages ................................................................................................. 86 C. Site Design on Rural Properties ..................................................................................................... 86 D. Form and Features ............................................................................................................................ 87 E. Materials and Detailing .................................................................................................................... 88 Chapter 8. Considerations for Contemporary Use ................................................................89 A. Alternative Materials ......................................................................................................................... 89 B. Equipment ........................................................................................................................................ 91 C. Accessibility Improvements ............................................................................................................ 92 Chapter 9. Other Cultural Resources.....................................................................................95 A. Bridges ............................................................................................................................................... 95 B. Rural and Rustic Roads ................................................................................................................... 97 C. Cemeteries .......................................................................................................................................... 97 D. Archeological Resources .................................................................................................................. 98 Chapter 10. Demolition ........................................................................................................ 103 A. Demolition is Discouraged ........................................................................................................... 103 B. Demolition by Neglect ................................................................................................................... 103 C. Alternatives to Demolition ............................................................................................................ 104 D. Moving Historic Buildings............................................................................................................. 104 E. Proposed Work that Requires a Demolition Application ......................................................... 105 F. Proposed Work that Does Not Require a Demolition Application........................................ 105 G. Required Considerations at Demolition Hearings ..................................................................... 106 H. The Degree of Importance Influence Demolition Decisions ................................................. 106 J. Documentation Requirements ...................................................................................................... 107 Appendix A - Glossary of Terms .......................................................................................... 109 Appendix B - Directory of Resources ...................................................................................113 FREDERICK COUNTY REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES DESIGN GUIDELINES Acknowledgements This document was prepared by Murphy & Dittenhafer Architects for Frederick County. The project was led by a subcommittee of the Frederick County Historic Preservation Commission and County staff and supported by the County Executive and County Council. Input was also received from the Historic Preservation Commission and community members. Historic Preservation Commission Gary D. Baker, RA (Chair and Guidelines Subcommittee Member) Barbara Wyatt (Vice-Chair and Guidelines Subcommittee Member) Tyler Bastian Mary Thompson Eytan Moked Jack Lynch Hettie Ballweber Blaine Hoffmann Kai Hagen (Council Liaison) County Staff Steve Horn, Division Director, Planning and Permitting Division Kimberly Golden Brandt, Director, Livable Frederick Planning & Design Office Amanda Whitmore, Historic Preservation Planner (Guidelines Subcommittee Member) Kathy Mitchell, Senior County Attorney County Executive Photos and Graphics Jan Gardner Hettie Ballweber Tyler Bastian County Council Gary D. Baker, RA M.C. Keegan-Ayer, Council President Barbara Wyatt Michael Blue, Council Vice-President Murphy & Dittenhafer Architects Steve McKay Kai Hagen Murphy & Dittenhafer Architects Team Jerry Donald Frank Dittenhafer II, FAIA, LEED AP Phil Dacey Rebecca McCormick, AIA Jessica Fitzwater Lauren Myatt, AIA, LEED AP FREDERICK COUNTY REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES DESIGN GUIDELINES 5.i. THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Program: Michael Barber (Virginia Department of Historic Resources) and Lauren Mcmillan (St
    47th Annual Middle Atlantic Archaeological Conference March 16-19, 2017 Virginia Beach Resort and Conference Center 2800 Shore Drive Virginia Beach, Virginia 23451 i MAAC Officers and Executive Board President President-Elect Douglas Sanford Gregory Lattanzi Department of Historic Preservation Bureau of Archaeology & Ethnography University of Mary Washington New Jersey State Museum 1301 College Avenue 205 West State Street Fredericksburg, VA 22401 Trenton, NJ 08625 [email protected] [email protected] Treasurer Membership Secretary Elizabeth Moore Eleanor Breen VA Museum of Natural History Office of Historic Alexandria/Alexandria Archaeology 21 Starling Ave 105 N. Union Street, #327 Martinsville, VA 24112 Alexandria, VA 23314 [email protected] [email protected] Recording Secretary Board Member at Large Brian Crane David Mudge Versar, Inc. 2021 Old York Road 6850 Versar Center Burlington, NJ 08016 Springfield, VA 22151 [email protected] [email protected] Board Member at Large/ Journal Editor Student Committee Chair Alexandra Crowder Roger Moeller University of Massachusetts, Boston Archaeological Services 18 Saint John Street Apt. 4 PO Box 386 Boston, MA 02130 Bethlehem, CT 06751 [email protected] [email protected] ii The Middle Atlantic Archaeological Conference and its Executive Board express their deep appreciation to the following individuals and organizations that generously have supported the undergraduate and graduate students presenting papers at the conference, including those participating in the student paper competition. D. Brad Hatch Lenny Truitt Michael Madden Claude A Bowen, Jr. The Archaeological Friends of Fairfax County Society of Delaware Archaeology ASV - Col. Howard Archeological Society MacCord Chapter of Maryland David Mudge Dovetail CRG, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Matter of the Application Of
    IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF * BEFORE THE BIGGS FORD SOLAR CENTER, LLC FOR A PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE * OF MARYLAND AND NECESSITY TO CONSTRUCT A 15.0 MW SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC GENER- * ATING FACILITY IN FREDERICK COUNTY, CASE NO. 9439, MARYLAND * PHASE II PROPOSED ORDER OF PUBLIC UTILITY LAW JUDGE Before: Ryan C. McLean Public Utility Law Judge Issued: August 27, 2020 Table of Contents Appearances ............................................................................................................................ iv I. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 1 II. Procedural History .......................................................................................................... 4 III. Summary of the Application and Parties’ Positions ....................................................... 8 A. Biggs Ford - The Amended Project ............................................................................. 8 B. PPRP .......................................................................................................................... 16 C. The County ................................................................................................................. 22 D. Staff ............................................................................................................................ 24 E. Biggs Ford’s Rebuttal Testimony .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Guns Or Plowshares: Significance and a Civil War Agricultural Landscape
    GUNS OR PLOWSHARES: SIGNIFICANCE AND A CIVIL WAR AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPE Martha Temkin Introduction struction of the B&O rail line, the first in the United States, began in 1828. The first train arrived at Monocacy Junc- Archeologists, whether explicitly or not, deal with tion a few years later, in 1831 (Dilts 1993:146). The junc- the concept of significance in all aspects of their work. tion is located on what was historically a portion of the Those working in an academic setting must choose sites Best Farm. interesting to themselves, but also to funding organizations. Europeans explored the Frederick County area and Those working for federal agencies or private sector cul- traded with the local American Indians beginning in the tural resource management firms must determine signifi- first decades of the eighteenth century (Scharf 1968:58). cance according to Section 106 of the Historic Preserva- In order to encourage settlement in western Maryland, Lord tion Act of 1966. The managers of historic sites, whether Baltimore released land for purchase in 1732 (Reed private or public must take into consideration the protec- 1999:10). Initially, wealthy individuals from the Tidewater tion and monitoring of archeological resources when con- acquired vast tracts of land as speculative investments. sidering significance. Significance, then, is an important Daniel Dulaney, an important lawyer and merchant-planter and pervasive concept in archeology. from Baltimore, was one of these early landowners. In While conducting a cultural landscape inventory 1745, he laid out the town of Frederick on one of these for Monocacy National Battlefield in Frederick County, large land patents.
    [Show full text]
  • F-7-141 Monocacy Natural Resources Management Area
    F-7-141 Monocacy Natural Resources Management Area Architectural Survey File This is the architectural survey file for this MIHP record. The survey file is organized reverse- chronological (that is, with the latest material on top). It contains all MIHP inventory forms, National Register nomination forms, determinations of eligibility (DOE) forms, and accompanying documentation such as photographs and maps. Users should be aware that additional undigitized material about this property may be found in on-site architectural reports, copies of HABS/HAER or other documentation, drawings, and the “vertical files” at the MHT Library in Crownsville. The vertical files may include newspaper clippings, field notes, draft versions of forms and architectural reports, photographs, maps, and drawings. Researchers who need a thorough understanding of this property should plan to visit the MHT Library as part of their research project; look at the MHT web site (mht.maryland.gov) for details about how to make an appointment. All material is property of the Maryland Historical Trust. Last Updated: 10-11-2011 CAPSULE SUMMARY Monocacy Natural Resources Management Area MIHJP# F-7-141 Dickerson vicinity Frederick and Montgomery counties, Maryland NRMA=1974 Public The Monocacy Natural Resources Management Area (NRMA) occupies 2,011 acres that includes property along both banks of the lower Monocacy River and most of the Furnace Branch watershed in southeastern Frederick and western Montgomery counties. The area is predominantly rural, comprising farmland and rolling and rocky wooded hills. Monocacy NRMA's main attraction is the Monocacy River, which was designated a Maryland Scenic River in 1974. The NRMA began in 1974 with the acquisition of the 729-acre Rock Hall estate.
    [Show full text]
  • Severna Park Voice. Call 410-647-9400
    in this section | Politics & Opinion | Business ECRWSS Severna Park Boys Sweep US POSTAGE F REE - Grab A Copy PAID Home Hoops Tournament PERMIT NO. 546 Millersville, MD VOICE HEALT H, BEAUTY & SEVERNAFITNESS PARK Health, �� Page B1 JANUARY 2020 Beauty & LOCAL Fitness Meet The POSTAL Guide Teacher Of CUSTOMER �� Inside TheY ear ITNESS Page 8 PARK F Working out doesn’t have to be a grueling chore. At Park Fitness, Danny O’Malley and Joe Bocek founders Voic have made fitness fun by creating a everna Park E community of like-minded members S striving to meet different goals. SERVING OUR COMMUNITY SINCE 1981 Semifinalists LES Page 7 Page 5 HAIRSTY WEIGHT LOSS Stylists are no longer just following E CARE Page 3 EY Follow these nutrition and directions but proactively �� Get answers to some of the exercise tips to create the lifestyle recommending styles and products. �� frequently asked questions you want in the new year. Page B6 about cataract surgery. Severna Park VoicE SERVING OUR COMMUNITY SINCE 1981 VOTED THE 2019 SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION MARYLAND FAMILY-OWNED BUSINESS Of THE YEAR SEVERNA PARK, MD JU AN ARY 15, 2020 A1 The Park Loses Two Community Icons AACPS Budget Proposal Focuses On New Nancy Brown Mary Carter Teachers, Pay Raises n his $1.36 billion operating budget Iproposal for Fiscal Year 2021, presented to the Board of Educa- tion on December 18, Superintendent George Arlotto in- cluded pay raises for employees and 195 classroom teaching positions to address enrollment in- creases and to reduce class sizes. More than 91% of AACPS Superintendent the new positions in George Arlotto Arlotto’s recommen- dation are for employees the social and emotional swim teacher who devoted nearly 70 years By Haley Weisgerber who will have daily contact needs of students.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2004
    Annual Planning Report 2004 FREDERICK COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING 12 E. CHURCH STREET WINCHESTER HALL FREDERICK, MARYLAND 21701 www.co.frederick.md.us/planning Table of Contents Page Number Executive Summary 1 Planning Commission Profile 2 Commission’s and Staff Directory 4 Demographic and Development Trends 7 Community Facilities 8 Zoning Administration 10 Comprehensive Planning 12 Land Preservation 20 Mapping and Data Services 22 Publications Available 23 Executive Summary The 2004 Planning Report for Frederick County, Maryland was prepared pursuant to the requirements of Article 66B of the Annotated Code of Maryland and provides a summary of the year’s planning activities and development trends. Project/Activity Highlights for 2004 • Completed update of the Urbana Region Plan, adopted in June 2004. • Continued review and update of New Market Region Plan and initiated work on the Walkersville Region Plan. • Completed County Commissioner Review of the Citizens Zoning Review Committee Final Report and staff began re-write of the Zoning Ordinance Update. • Processed seven farm applications to sell their development rights under the MALPF Program and received 40 applications for the Installment Purchase Program (IPP). • Received State designation of the Carrollton Manor area as an official Rural Legacy Area. • Processed 49 Board of Zoning Appeals cases up from 44 in 2003. • Conducted 684 new and follow-up zoning inspections with the number of zoning complaints down slightly from 2003 to 249 in 2004. • Continued implementation of the streamlined Land Development and Permitting Process. • Continued research on Pipeline Development and Industrial/Commercial Land Inventory. Development and Demographic Highlights • County population increased by 4,023 persons in 2004, the lowest annual increase since 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Tfc African American Brochure 2010 Web.Indd
    F r e d e r i c k c o u n t y African American Heritage in the City of Frederick and Frederick County, Maryland Welcome to the city of Frederick and Frederick City of Frederick county! this guide provides glimpses of more Wthan two centuries of African American heritage in our area and presents a new opportunity to experience the past. Feel the heat of smelters at catoctin Furnace, where expert African metalworkers helped build our nation by forging an array of ironworks, including cannonballs used A view looking east on All Saints Street (c. 1903). to win American independence. Marvel at the All SAintS Street neighborhood skill, dedication and compassion of those slaves, A thoroughfare at the edge of town in late 18th-century Frederick, All Saints Street took on a different flavor over free persons, and “contraband” who helped heal the next 100 years. By the early 1900s, its modest length had become a center of commerce and entertainment not the thousands of civil War wounded in Frederick only for Frederick City’s “colored” population, but also for those in the county. Far into the evenings on Fridays after the conflicts at South Mountain, Monocacy, and Saturdays in particular, the street assumed a vibrant and festive appearance. Those who could not easily be Antietam and Gettysburg. imagine the daily bustle accommodated elsewhere found virtually all that they needed right here. Services from banking and medical care to grocery of segregated businesses on All Saints Street. Hear stores and beauty parlors operated out of people’s homes, and restaurants featuring home cooking fanned out onto the the strains of jazz tunes and harmonies of gospel sidewalks.
    [Show full text]
  • [ 3 ], Page 1-16 @ Normalize ( Layoutsummer07q6.5.Qxp )
    3 weddell seals 6 design and poverty 8 labrador grizzlies 10 times square Smithsonian Institution SCIENCE, HISTORY AND THE ARTS NUMBER 17 · SUMMER 2007 smithsonian online ‘Online Academy.’ In Colonial times, as the white Jesuit inhabitants of Car- rollton Manor in Adamstown, Md., were upstairs saying mass, their slaves were in the kitchen downstairs practic- ing the African religion of Hoodoo. number 17 · summer 2007 This is one of the fascinating pieces of information available on the “Online Published quarterly by the Smithsonian Office of Public Affairs, Smithsonian Institution Academy” Web site of the Smithso- Building, Room 354, MRC 033, P.O. Box nian’s Anacostia Community Museum. 37012, Washington, D.C. 20013-7012, for A large rock crystal found by archaeol- Smithsonian Contributing Members, scholars, ogists buried beneath the kitchen educators, museum personnel, libraries, hearth at Carrollton Manor was placed journalists and others. To be added to the mailing list or to request this publication there by the African cook “to control in an accessible format, call (202) 633-5181 the comings and goings of the spirits in (voice) or (202) 633-5285 (TTY). the spirit world up and down the flue “Sisters II,” a 1929 woodblock print by James John Barrat, Editor and out the fireplace,” explains Univer- L.Wells, is a featured artifact on the Anacostia Evelyn S. Lieberman, Director of sity of Maryland anthropologist Mark Community Museum’s “Online Academy.” Communications and Public Affairs Leone in an online video. “Online Academy” features video interviews with scholars, collectors of African American mate- Telephone: (202) 633-2400 rial culture, conservators and others.
    [Show full text]
  • The Potomac Above the Falls — Archeological Identification And
    COHONGOROOTO: THE POTOMAC ABOVE THE FALLS ARCHEOLOGICAL IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION STUDY OF C&O CANAL NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK ROCK CREEK TO SANDY HOOK (MILE MARKERS 0 TO 59) Volume I PREPARED FOR: NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION NATIONAL PARK SERVICE 1100 OHIO DRIVE, S.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20242 PREPARED BY: THE LOUIS BERGER GROUP, INC. 2300 N Street NW Washington, D.C. 20037 December 2005 Final Report COHONGOROOTO: THE POTOMAC ABOVE THE FALLS ARCHEOLOGICAL IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION STUDY OF CHESAPEAKE & OHIO CANAL NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK ROCK CREEK TO SANDY HOOK (MILE MARKERS 0 TO 59) VOLUME I Final Report PREPARED FOR: National Capital Region National Park Service 1100 Ohio Drive, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20242 PREPARED BY: Stuart Fiedel, John Bedell, Charles LeeDecker THE LOUIS BERGER GROUP, INC. 2300 N Street NW Washington, D.C. 20037 December 2005 FOREWORD This is the first of three volumes reporting the results of a three-year archeological survey of the easternmost 59 miles of the Chesapeake & Ohio Canal National Historical Park (C&O Canal Park) for the National Park Service (NPS), National Capital Region, from 2003 through 2005. In recognition of the paucity of basic archeological data for the C&O Canal Park, and for other NPS properties in the National Capital Region, funds were devoted to implement the Systemwide Archeological Inventory Program (SAIP) in this area. The SAIP was developed to address the requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act (specifically Sections 106 and 110), Executive Order 11593, and the Archeological Resources Protection Act. The rationale for the archeological survey was based primarily on the NPS’s resource management needs under Section 110 rather than being driven by development or capital improvement projects within the park.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Historical Magazine, 2008, Volume 103, Issue No. 1
    fWSft S^ 5SZI-I' HALL OF RECORDS LIBRARY Spring 2008 ANNAPOL'S, MARYLAND ivnnrYT AND Historical Magazine Coming this summer from the MdHS Press! Treasure in the Cellar: A Tale of Gold in Depression-Era Baltimore LEONARD AUGSBURGER LEONARD iUGSIURGER rREAIURE IM THE CELLAR •^^1 ATALE OF GOLD IN OEPBEJSIOM-ERA SALTIMOBE Coin collectors and enthusiasts have long been familiar with the story of two boys who unearthed a fortune in gold coins while playing in a Baltimore basement in 1934. But the rest of the story trailed off to a few odd details. Lifelong coin collector Leonard Augsberger uncovered the rest of the story. What happened to the kids? The gold? Who buried it in the first place? The author is the guest speaker at the MdHS Annual Meeting, Thursday, June 26, 5:00 P.M. Advance copies of the book will be available. Please call 410-685-3750 x321 if you are planning to attend. Publication Date, September 2008. Paper, $26.00. ISBN 978-0-938420-97-6. 35 % discount for MdHS members. To order call the MdHS, 410-685-3750 x363, or contact our distributor, Johns Hopkins University Press, 410-516-6965. PUBLICATION OF THIS WORK WAS MADE POSSIBLE BY THE GENEROUS SUPPORT OF THE FRIENDS OF THE PRESS OF THE MARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY Maryland Historical Society Founded 1844 Officers Henry Hodges Stansbury, Chair Thomas A. Collier, Vice President Alex. G. Fisher, President Richard T. Moreland, Vice President James W. Constable, Secretary Dorothy Mel. Scott, Vice President Frederick M. Hudson, Treasurer Martin Sullivan, Vice President Cecil E.
    [Show full text]
  • BULL RUN MOUNTAIN HOUSE, SITE 44FQ0313 Fauquier County, Virginia WSSI #22316.01
    BULL RUN MOUNTAIN HOUSE, SITE 44FQ0313 Fauquier County, Virginia WSSI #22316.01 Phase I Archeological Investigation (±0.65 acres) December, 2013 Prepared for: Fauquier County Department of Community Development 10 Hotel Street, 3rd Floor Warrenton, Virginia 20186 Prepared by: Boyd Sipe, M.A., RPA and Andrés E. Garzón-Oechsle 5300 Wellington Branch Drive, Suite 100 Gainesville, Virginia 20155 Tel: 703-679-5600 Email: [email protected] www.wetlandstudies.com ABSTRACT A Phase I archeological investigation was conducted within a ±0.65 acre portion of the ±3.3 acre site 44FQ0313, the Bull Run Mountain House site located in Bull Run Mountains Natural Area Preserve in Fauquier County, Virginia. Additionally, a public outreach component was undertaken that included the excavation of two test units. Thunderbird Archeology, a division of Wetland Studies and Solutions, Inc., of Gainesville, Virginia, conducted the studies for Fauquier County Planning Division of Warrenton, Virginia. The fieldwork was carried out in September and October of 2013. The historic artifact assemblage recovered from the site indicates that the intensive historic occupation of site 44FQ0313 may have dated from circa 1785 to circa 1825 during John Monday’s ownership of the property. The late historic finds, represented primarily by bottle glass dating to the late 19th century and early 20th century may be associated with the reported ephemeral use of the property as a hunting lodge or retreat during these periods. A previously unknown prehistoric component of the site that likely dates to the Archaic period (8000 B.C. – 1000 B.C.) was also discovered during the Phase I investigations.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Report: South Pickett Street Properties
    South Pickett Street Properties (880/890 S. Pickett St. & 620 Burnside Place) City of Alexandria, Virginia WSSI #30318.0 Documentary1 Study & Geoarcheological Investigations May 2019 Revised July 2019 - Final Report Prepared for: Public Storage 701 Western Ave Glendale CA 91201 Prepared by: John P. Mullen, M.A., RPA, Anna Maas, MUEP, Penny Sandbeck, M.A. Daniel Baicy, M.A., RPA and Kathleen Jockel, B.A. 5300 Wellington Branch Drive, Suite 100 Gainesville, Virginia 20155 Tel: 703-679-5600 Email: [email protected] www.wetlandstudies.com ABSTRACT Thunderbird Archeology, a division of Wetland Studies and Solutions, Inc. (WSSI) of Gainesville, Virginia, conducted a Documentary Study and a Geoarcheological Investigation of three parcels (880 South Pickett Street, 890 South Pickett Street, and 620 Burnside Place) totaling ±7 acres in Alexandria, Virginia. The documentary research was conducted in anticipation of the planned redevelopment of part of the study area. The goal was to provide a contextual study of the prehistory and history of the property, focusing on evaluating the potential for locating intact archeological resources on the property. The study area was continuously subdivided, consolidated with other properties, and subdivided further throughout its history. It appears to have remained completely undeveloped until the 1966 construction of the building that stands there today. The study area has low probability for historic resources, but a moderate to high probability of containing prehistoric cultural resources that could potentially provide information about the prehistoric habitation of the region. However, the demolition, grading, and construction of parking lots and buildings in the late 20th century likely disturbed the archeological context of 880 South Pickett Street, 890 South Pickett Street, and 620 Burnside Place, though the degree of disturbance is unknown.
    [Show full text]