DOCSLIB.ORG

Site Report: South Pickett Street Properties

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Site Report: South Pickett Street Properties South Pickett Street Properties (880/890 S. Pickett St. & 620 Burnside Place) City of Alexandria, Virginia WSSI #30318.0 Documentary1 Study & Geoarcheological Investigations May 2019 Revised July 2019 - Final Report Prepared for: Public Storage 701 Western Ave Glendale CA 91201 Prepared by: John P. Mullen, M.A., RPA, Anna Maas, MUEP, Penny Sandbeck, M.A. Daniel Baicy, M.A., RPA and Kathleen Jockel, B.A. 5300 Wellington Branch Drive, Suite 100 Gainesville, Virginia 20155 Tel: 703-679-5600 Email: [email protected] www.wetlandstudies.com ABSTRACT Thunderbird Archeology, a division of Wetland Studies and Solutions, Inc. (WSSI) of Gainesville, Virginia, conducted a Documentary Study and a Geoarcheological Investigation of three parcels (880 South Pickett Street, 890 South Pickett Street, and 620 Burnside Place) totaling ±7 acres in Alexandria, Virginia. The documentary research was conducted in anticipation of the planned redevelopment of part of the study area. The goal was to provide a contextual study of the prehistory and history of the property, focusing on evaluating the potential for locating intact archeological resources on the property. The study area was continuously subdivided, consolidated with other properties, and subdivided further throughout its history. It appears to have remained completely undeveloped until the 1966 construction of the building that stands there today. The study area has low probability for historic resources, but a moderate to high probability of containing prehistoric cultural resources that could potentially provide information about the prehistoric habitation of the region. However, the demolition, grading, and construction of parking lots and buildings in the late 20th century likely disturbed the archeological context of 880 South Pickett Street, 890 South Pickett Street, and 620 Burnside Place, though the degree of disturbance is unknown. A geoarcheological study was conducted April 23, 2019 and focused on determining whether buried surfaces, which could yield evidence of Native American occupation and activities, remain intact within the alluvial deposits buried under the fill layers. Testing at the 880/890 South Pickett Street property was disturbed; but a potential buried ground surface was located at the southern end of the 620 Burnside Place parcel. The remnant buried ground surface may have been available for exploitation by prehistoric populations for resource procurement but was likely too poorly drained for occupation. This area will not be impacted by the proposed construction. No further archeological work is needed. South Pickett Street Properties – Documentary Study & Geoarcheological Investigation WSSI #30318.01 – May 2019 Page i South Pickett Street Properties – Documentary Study & Geoarcheological Investigation WSSI #30318.01 – May 2019 Page ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................ i TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................ iii LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................... iv INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ..................................................................................... 1 CULTURAL HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ............................................................. 5 Prehistoric Overview .................................................................................................... 5 Paleoindian Period (15,000-8000 BCE)..................................................................... 5 Early Archaic Period (8000-6000 BCE) ..................................................................... 7 Middle Archaic (6000-2500 BCE) .............................................................................. 8 Late Archaic (2500-1200 BCE) ................................................................................ 10 Early Woodland (1200-500 BCE) ............................................................................. 11 Middle Woodland (500 BCE-900 CE) ...................................................................... 13 Late Woodland (900 CE to 1600 CE/European Contact) ........................................ 15 Native American Sites in the City of Alexandria ...................................................... 19 Historic Overview ....................................................................................................... 21 Settlement to Society (1607-1750) ............................................................................ 21 Colony to Nation (1751-1789) .................................................................................. 24 Early National Period (1789-1830) .......................................................................... 24 Antebellum Period (1830-1860) ............................................................................... 25 Civil War (1861-1865) .............................................................................................. 26 Reconstruction and Growth (1865-1917) ................................................................. 28 World War I to World War II (1917-1945) ............................................................... 29 The New Dominion (1945-1992) .............................................................................. 29 PROPERTY HISTORY ................................................................................................. 29 ARCHEOLOGICAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT ................................................... 47 Current Conditions ........................................................................................................ 47 Proposed Construction .................................................................................................. 47 Previous Geotechnical Investigations ........................................................................ 47 Potential for Prehistoric Archeological Resources ....................................................... 47 Potential for Historic Archeological Resources ............................................................ 55 Summary and Recommendations ................................................................................. 55 GEOARCHEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS ......................................................... 55 Geoarcheological Summary and Recommendations .................................................... 60 REFERENCES CITED .................................................................................................. 61 APPENDIX I ................................................................................................................... 73 Scope of Work for Documentary Study ........................................................................ 73 APPENDIX II .................................................................................................................. 79 Scope of Work for Geoarcheological Evaluation ......................................................... 79 APPENDIX III ................................................................................................................ 85 Soil Bore Profiles .......................................................................................................... 85 South Pickett Street Properties – Documentary Study & Geoarcheological Investigation WSSI #30318.01 – May 2019 Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Vicinity Map........................................................................................................ 2 Figure 2: City of Alexandria Parcel Map ............................................................................ 3 Figure 3: 1612 John Smith Map........................................................................................ 18 Figure 4: Fairfax Patents and Northern Neck Grants ........................................................ 33 Figure 5: 1714 Plat of 4,629 Acres of Land...................................................................... 34 Figure 6: 1987 Mitchell Map Showing Fairfax County Landowners in 1760 .................. 35 Figure 7: 1862 McDowell Map......................................................................................... 37 Figure 8: 1878 Hopkins Map ............................................................................................ 38 Figure 9: 1900 USGS Quadrangle Map ............................................................................ 39 Figure 10: 1915 Soils Map ................................................................................................ 40 Figure 11: Spring 1937 Black and White Imagery ........................................................... 41 Figure 12: 1954 Black and White Imagery ....................................................................... 42 Figure 13: 1965 USGS 7.5' Quadrangle Map ................................................................... 43 Figure 14: 1967 Deed of Subdivision ............................................................................... 44 Figure 15: 1980 Black and White Imagery ....................................................................... 45 Figure 16: 1990 Natural Color Imagery...........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Maryland Historical Magazine, 1995, Volume 90, Issue No. 4
    I-1-Si Winter 1995 MARYLAND 2 -aa> 3 Q. Historical Magazine THE MARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY Founded 1844 Dennis A. Fiori, Director The Maryland Historical Magazine Ernest L. Scott Jr., Editor Robert I. Cottom Jr., Associate Editor Patricia Dockman Anderson, Associate Editor Jessica M. Pigza, Managing Editor Jeff Goldman, Photographer Angela Anthony, Robin Donaldson Coblentz, Christopher T.George, Jane Gushing Lange, and Lama S. Rice, Editorial Associates Robert J. Brugger, Consulting Editor Regional Editors John B. Wiseman, Frostburg State University Jane G. Sween, Montgomery Gounty Historical Society Pegram Johnson III, Accoceek, Maryland John R. Wennersten, University of Maryland, Eastern Shore Acting as an editorial board, the Publications Committee of the Maryland Historical Society oversees and supports the magazine staff. Members of the committee are: Robert J. Brugger, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Go-Ghair John W. Mitchell, Upper Marlboro; Trustee, Go-Ghair Joseph L. Arnold, University of Maryland, Baltimore Gounty Jean H. Baker, Goucher Gollege James H. Bready, Baltimore Lois Green Garr, St. Mary's Gity Gommission Stiles Tuttle Golwill, Baltimore Richard R. Duncan, Georgetown University Dennis A. Fiori, Maryland Historical Society, ex-officio Jack G. Goellner, The Johns Hopkins University Press Gilbert Gude, Bethesda David Hein, Hood Gollege John Higham, The Johns Hopkins University Ronald Hoffman, Institute of Early American History and Gulture Samuel Hopkins, Baltimore Gharles McG. Mathias, Ghevy Ghase Roland G. McGonnell, Morgan State University Norvell E. Miller III, Baltimore Edward G. Papenfuse, Maryland State Archives The views and conclusions expressed in this magazine are those of the authors. The editors are responsible for the decision to make them public.
    [Show full text]
  • First Battle of Bull Run-Manassas
    Name: edHelper First Battle of Bull Run-Manassas The thought that the American Civil War would last four long years never entered the minds of most of the people. It was assumed by people on both sides that each side would win quickly. It is interesting to note that many of the battles during the war had two names. The North would name them after the nearest body of water-- in this case, a stream called Bull Run. (Run is an early English word that means a stream or creek.) The South named them after the nearest town, such as Manassas. The new capital for the Confederacy (Richmond, Virginia) was only 100 miles away from the Union capital (Washington, D.C.). When this great battle came, it was certain to take place between the two cities because of their proximity. In preparation for an assault, the Union soldiers began fortifying areas around the capital and the nearby towns of Alexandria and Arlington, Virginia. Confederate forces made no immediate effort to attack Washington as the Union expected them to do. Instead, General Beauregard gathered his army at Manassas Junction where there was a railway. Union forces were commanded by General Winfield Scott, but he was too old and infirm to lead the men on the field. That job fell to General Irwin McDowell. While many men had flocked to the Union banner, few had any training as soldiers. He wanted time to train the men for battle, but Congress wanted him to confront the Confederates. The two forces met near the creek called Bull Run on July 21, 1861.
    [Show full text]
  • Confederate Soldier-Christians and the Impact of War on Their Faith
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 8-2001 "Soldiers of the Cross": Confederate Soldier-Christians and the Impact of War on Their Faith Kent Toby Dollar University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Dollar, Kent Toby, ""Soldiers of the Cross": Confederate Soldier-Christians and the Impact of War on Their Faith. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2001. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/3237 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Kent Toby Dollar entitled ""Soldiers of the Cross": Confederate Soldier-Christians and the Impact of War on Their Faith." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in History. Stephen V. Ash, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) c.t To the Graduate Council: I am subinitting herewith a dissertation written by Kent TobyDollar entitled '"Soldiers of the Cross': Confederate Soldier-Christians and the Impact of War on Their Faith." I have examined the final copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree ofDoctor ofPhilosophy,f with a major in History.
    [Show full text]
  • BULL RUN MOUNTAIN HOUSE, SITE 44FQ0313 Fauquier County, Virginia WSSI #22316.01
    BULL RUN MOUNTAIN HOUSE, SITE 44FQ0313 Fauquier County, Virginia WSSI #22316.01 Phase I Archeological Investigation (±0.65 acres) December, 2013 Prepared for: Fauquier County Department of Community Development 10 Hotel Street, 3rd Floor Warrenton, Virginia 20186 Prepared by: Boyd Sipe, M.A., RPA and Andrés E. Garzón-Oechsle 5300 Wellington Branch Drive, Suite 100 Gainesville, Virginia 20155 Tel: 703-679-5600 Email: [email protected] www.wetlandstudies.com ABSTRACT A Phase I archeological investigation was conducted within a ±0.65 acre portion of the ±3.3 acre site 44FQ0313, the Bull Run Mountain House site located in Bull Run Mountains Natural Area Preserve in Fauquier County, Virginia. Additionally, a public outreach component was undertaken that included the excavation of two test units. Thunderbird Archeology, a division of Wetland Studies and Solutions, Inc., of Gainesville, Virginia, conducted the studies for Fauquier County Planning Division of Warrenton, Virginia. The fieldwork was carried out in September and October of 2013. The historic artifact assemblage recovered from the site indicates that the intensive historic occupation of site 44FQ0313 may have dated from circa 1785 to circa 1825 during John Monday’s ownership of the property. The late historic finds, represented primarily by bottle glass dating to the late 19th century and early 20th century may be associated with the reported ephemeral use of the property as a hunting lodge or retreat during these periods. A previously unknown prehistoric component of the site that likely dates to the Archaic period (8000 B.C. – 1000 B.C.) was also discovered during the Phase I investigations.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Trenches a News Letter of the Lt General John C
    IN THE TRENCHES A NEWS LETTER OF THE LT GENERAL JOHN C. PEMBERTON CAMP 1354 VICKSBURG MISSISSIPPI SONS OF CONFEDERATE VETERANS January 2016 Issue Edward Campbell Commander Eddy Cresap Editor ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sirs, you have no reason to be ashamed of your Confederate dead; see to it they have no reason to be ashamed of you.” Robert Lewis Dabney. Chaplain for Stonewall Jackson. Commander's Column Dear Compatriots, I want to take this time to wish you and all of your families a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. The word "Merry" comes from an Old English word which at the time meant "Strong". When you wish someone a Merry Christmas, you are actually saying to them to "Be Strong in the Lord". I say that to encourage all of you to continue strong in fight to preserve our Heritage. The University of Mississippi has recently changed the name of their Winter Festival taking out the name "Christmas" and instead calling it a "Hoddy Toddy Holiday". This of course to be Politically Correct and more inclusive. The fight to save our Southern Heritage is the same fight that we are undergoing to save our Christian Observances, Holidays and indeed, our entire Western Civilization. I urge all Ole Miss alumni to contact the University about the Winter Festival and the decision to no longer fly the state flag, which should be a state law for all state funded organizations. If anyone has any information about the state flag which is no longer flying on the square on Monroe Street, please let me know.
    [Show full text]
  • History to 1877 Teacher(S): Mrs
    Remote Learning Packet Please submit scans of written work in Google Classroom at the end of the week. May 4-8, 2020 Course: U.S. History to 1877 Teacher(s): Mrs. Jimenez ([email protected]) Weekly Plan : Monday, May 4 ⬜ Read Chapter 18 Lesson 2 (pgs. 508-514) ⬜ Answer reading questions (worksheet) ⬜ Optional: Watch video on First Battle of Manassas - https://safeyoutube.net/w/hlB8 Tuesday, May 5 ⬜ Read and annotate Lesson: Early Strategies and Battles ⬜ Answer reading questions (worksheet) ⬜ Optional: Watch video on the War in the West - https://safeY ouTube.net/w/t1bA (short version) or on Battle of Shiloh https://safeYouTube.net/w/wNbA (long version) Wednesday, May 6 ⬜ Read and annotate Lesson: Campaigns of 1862 ⬜ Answer reading questions (worksheet) ⬜ Optional: Watch video on Battle of Antietam - https://safeYouTube.net/w/l5bA (short version) https://safeYouTube.net/w/txbA (long version) Thursday, May 7 ⬜ Read and annotate the Emancipation Proclamation ⬜ Answer reading questions (worksheet) ⬜ Watch Mrs. Jimenez’s video on Google Classroom (not optional!) ⬜ Optional: Watch video on the War in the East - https://safeY ouTube.net/w/f3bA Friday, May 8 ⬜ Attend office hours & Zoom class discussion on the War and the Proclamation ⬜ Catch-up or review the week’s work Statement of Academic Honesty I affirm that the work completed from the packet I affirm that, to the best of my knowledge, my is mine and that I completed it independently. child completed this work independently _______________________________________ _______________________________________ Student Signature Parent Signature Monday, May 4 1. Read the assigned pages (508-514) 2. Answer the questions on these readings in this week’s worksheet for Monday.
    [Show full text]
  • Collection Part 1
    Minnesota in the Civil War A Rochester, MN Pos/ Bw//a/!.w collection of articles describing the role of the state of Minnesota during the Civil War. 2011 I. September 20, 2011. Minnesota's Crucial Role. An overview of the series. 2. September 27. Bull Run is Testing Ground. Ist Minnesota Regiment at Bull Run. 3. October 4. 68 Left Waioja, 1 Returned. Soldiers with the 2nd Minnesota Regiment. 4. October 18. Fort Smelling: Nothing's Easy. History of Fort Smelling. 5. October 25. Gettysburg Trips Drive Home Meaning for Students. Minnesota students travel to Gettysburg. 6. November I. Chatfield Guards Answered the Call. Company A of the 2nd Minnesota Volunteers. 7. November 15. Area Was Hotbed for Militias during Civil War. Zouaves from St.Anthony (early Minneapolis) in the Civil War and the story of Elmer Ellsworth. 8. November 22. In Wartime, Reason for Thanks. Thanksgiving among Minnesota soldiers and civilians in Minnesota. 9. November 29. Finding Civil War Veterans Graves. Minnesota graves. 10. December 6. Colville Still Stands Tall in Civil War History. Story of col. William Colvill,1st Minnesota Regiment, from Cannon Falls, MN. 11. December 13. Civil War Firearms Pack a Punch. Civil War firearms. 12. December 20. 1861 was Bad, but 1862 Would be Worse. 1st, 2nd and 3rd Minnesota Regiments in 1862. Dakota Warin Minnesota. 2012 13. September 25. Antietam Was Bloody Turning Point. let Minnesota Regiment at Antietam. 14. October 2. Area Soldiers Head West, Not South. Story of Minnesota soldiers in Western Minnesota during the war. 15. October 9. Downstream, Pivotal Battles Were Fought.
    [Show full text]
  • Abolition, Civil War, Emancipation, and Reconstruction - an Illustrated Thesis James Schiele Washington University in St
    Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) January 2011 America at Mid-19th Century: Abolition, Civil War, Emancipation, and Reconstruction - An Illustrated Thesis James Schiele Washington University in St. Louis Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/etd Recommended Citation Schiele, James, "America at Mid-19th Century: Abolition, Civil War, Emancipation, and Reconstruction - An Illustrated Thesis" (2011). All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs). 468. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/etd/468 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY University College Department of American Culture Studies AMERICA AT MID-19TH CENTURY: ABOLITION, CIVIL WAR, EMANCIPATION, AND RECONSTRUCTION AN ILLUSTRATED THESIS by James E. Schiele A Thesis presented to the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts May 2011 Saint Louis, Missouri copyright by James E. Schiele 2011 Acknowledgements I wish to acknowledge the assistance that I received from my faculty Thesis Committee at Washington University in St. Louis: Douglas B. Dowd, Thesis Committee Chair, Professor of Art Iver Bernstein, Professor of History Steven M. Fazzari, Professor of Economics Wayne D. Fields, Lynne Cooper Harvey Distinguished Professor of English Gary J. Miller, Professor of Political Science I also would like to thank the following University staff: Anne Posega, Maria Schlafly, Christine Moseley, and Nancy Galofré, as well as Sue Rainey, former editor of Imprint, the journal of the American Historical Print Collectors Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductions Supplied by EDRS Are the Best That Can Be Made from the Original Document
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 476 512 SO 034 870 TITLE Civil War Preservation Trust Two Week Curriculum for Teaching the Civil War. INSTITUTION Civil War Preservation Trust, Washington, DC. PUB DATE 2003-00-00 NOTE 554p.; Support provided by The History Channel. AVAILABLE FROM The Civil War Preservation Trust, 1331 H Street N.W. Suite 1001, Washington, DC 20005. Tel: 202-367-1861; e-mail: info @civilwar,.org; Web site: http://www.civilwar.org/. PUB TYPE Guides Classroom Teacher (052) EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF02/PC23 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Civil War (United States); Curriculum Enrichment; *Field Trips; Grade 11; Grade 5; Grade 8; *Heritage Education; *Historic Sites; History Instruction; Intermediate Grades; Middle Schools; Secondary. Education; Social Studies IDENTIFIERS Site Visits ABSTRACT The Civil War was perhaps the greatest turning point in U.S. history. The dual themes of slavery and power deeply divided the growing nation during the first half of the 19th century. The mission of the Civil War Preservation Trust (CWPT) is to preserve the significant Civil War battlefields by protecting the land and educating the public about the vital roles those battlefields played in directing the course of the nation's history. This 2-week CWPT curriculum is designed for students in grades 5,8, and 11. For each grade level, there are six sections: (1) "Disunion"; (2) "War"; (3) "Soldier Life"; (4) "Preservation";(5) Battlefield Field Trips"; and (6)"The War at Home." These sections are vital in using battlefield land as outdoor classrooms. The curriculum contains ideas for the classroom as well as ideas for interdisciplinary activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Stone Wall Aug & Sept 11
    BRCWRT — Vol . XVIII, Issue 6 AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2011 Page 1 The Newsletter of the Bull Run Civil War Round Table — Vol. XVIII, Issue 6 AUGUST/SEPT 2011 BERNSTEIN & OWEN TO SPEAK MEMBERSHIP MEETING TO THE BRCWRT 7:00 P.M. Centreville Library By Mark Trbovich We will be taking a month off from our 1861 AUGUST 11 GUEST SPEAKER: Sesquicentennial speaker journey to have the privilege to meet an author and his new book at the August 11 Steven Bernstein meeting of our award-winning round table. Steven Bernstein works as an educator and TOPIC: The Confederacy’s Last has been a research associate for historian Thomas Northern Offensive Fleming since 1999. He has done research on four of Mr. Fleming's books: The New Dealer's War: FDR and the War within World War II (2001); The Illusion of Victory: America in World War I (2003); The Perils of Peace (2007), and, more recently, The Intimate Lives of the Founding Fathers (2009). Steven has written for Amer- ica's Civil War, the Washington Times, Western Pennsyl- SEPTEMBER 8 GUEST SPEAKER vania History, and for numerous other journals and newspapers. Wally Owen, II In addition to his topic and book, The Confeder- TOPIC: Lincoln’s Forts: A Guide acy’s Last Northern Offensive: Jubal Early, the Army of the Valley and the Raid on Washington 1864, he has to the Civil War Defenses of written a dozen articles on the Civil War. He has B.A. Washington and M.A. degrees, and lives in Maryland. Confederate Gen. Jubal Early was such a contro- versial figure, especially during the raid on Washington, that getting new insight is a must.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor. Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
    [Show full text]
  • The Selection and Preparation of White Officers for the Command of Black Troops in the American Civil War: a Study of the 41St and 100Th U.S
    THE SELECTION AND PREPARATION OF WHITE OFFICERS FOR THE COMMAND OF BLACK TROOPS IN THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR: A STUDY OF THE 41ST AND 100TH U.S. COLORED INFANTRY Paul D. Renard Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Human Development February 15, 2006 Falls Church, Virginia COMMITTEE Dr. Marcie Boucouvalas, chair. Dr. Gabriella Belli Dr. Daniel Kuehl Dr. Linda Morris Dr. Harold Stubblefield Keywords: American Civil War, U.S. Colored Troops, officer examination, black soldiers, Bureau for Colored Troops © 2006 by Paul D. Renard The selection and preparation of white officers for the command of black troops in the American Civil War: A study of the 41st and 100th U.S. Colored Infantry Paul D. Renard ABSTRACT American Civil War officer preparation activities were rooted in the broader practices of antebellum military education as applied at West Point, other military academies, and the state militia system. The arrival of black troops in the Union Army led to a radical, if temporary, transformation in the Army’s process for the selection and preparation of officers—but only for the white officers who served with black regiments. Overtly political or casual processes of the early Civil War were replaced in many cases by formal examinations and the centralized review of results, operating in parallel with more traditional political patronage systems of appointment. This study uses the experiences of officers from several black infantry regiments, and particularly the 41st U.S.
    [Show full text]