BULL RUN MOUNTAIN HOUSE, SITE 44FQ0313 Fauquier County, Virginia WSSI #22316.01

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

BULL RUN MOUNTAIN HOUSE, SITE 44FQ0313 Fauquier County, Virginia WSSI #22316.01 BULL RUN MOUNTAIN HOUSE, SITE 44FQ0313 Fauquier County, Virginia WSSI #22316.01 Phase I Archeological Investigation (±0.65 acres) December, 2013 Prepared for: Fauquier County Department of Community Development 10 Hotel Street, 3rd Floor Warrenton, Virginia 20186 Prepared by: Boyd Sipe, M.A., RPA and Andrés E. Garzón-Oechsle 5300 Wellington Branch Drive, Suite 100 Gainesville, Virginia 20155 Tel: 703-679-5600 Email: [email protected] www.wetlandstudies.com ABSTRACT A Phase I archeological investigation was conducted within a ±0.65 acre portion of the ±3.3 acre site 44FQ0313, the Bull Run Mountain House site located in Bull Run Mountains Natural Area Preserve in Fauquier County, Virginia. Additionally, a public outreach component was undertaken that included the excavation of two test units. Thunderbird Archeology, a division of Wetland Studies and Solutions, Inc., of Gainesville, Virginia, conducted the studies for Fauquier County Planning Division of Warrenton, Virginia. The fieldwork was carried out in September and October of 2013. The historic artifact assemblage recovered from the site indicates that the intensive historic occupation of site 44FQ0313 may have dated from circa 1785 to circa 1825 during John Monday’s ownership of the property. The late historic finds, represented primarily by bottle glass dating to the late 19th century and early 20th century may be associated with the reported ephemeral use of the property as a hunting lodge or retreat during these periods. A previously unknown prehistoric component of the site that likely dates to the Archaic period (8000 B.C. – 1000 B.C.) was also discovered during the Phase I investigations. Although late historic or modern subsurface disturbances were identified in portions of the site, we feel that both the prehistoric and historic components of the site retain significant research potential, due in part, to the limited archeological data available on similar historic or prehistoric occupations in mountainous regions of Fauquier County, Virginia. We recommend that site 44FQ0313 be considered eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) under Criterion D as an individual resource and a contributing element of the Little River Rural Historic District (030-5579). We also concur with previous recommendations regarding the Bull Run Mountain House (030- 0600) and recommend that the resource be considered eligible for the NRHP under criteria A and C. Phase I Archeological Investigation of Site 44FQ0313, the Bull Run Mountain House WSSI #22316.01 - December 2013 Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................ i TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................. ii LIST OF EXHIBITS ....................................................................................................... iii LIST OF PLATES ........................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................... iv INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ..................................................................................... 1 PALEOENVIRONMENTAL BACKGROUND ............................................................ 4 CULTURAL HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ............................................................. 6 Prehistoric Overview .................................................................................................... 6 Historic Overview ....................................................................................................... 12 PREVIOUS ARCHEOLOGICAL RESEARCH ......................................................... 27 RESEARCH EXPECTATIONS .................................................................................... 35 FIELD AND LABORATORY METHODS ................................................................. 35 RESULTS OF FIELD INVESTIGATIONS ................................................................. 37 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................ 52 REFERENCES CITED .................................................................................................. 53 PLATES ........................................................................................................................... 61 APPENDIX I ................................................................................................................... 79 Archival Research (Provided by Fauquier County Planning Division) ................ 79 APPENDIX II .................................................................................................................. 89 DHR Resource Forms ................................................................................................. 89 APPENDIX III .............................................................................................................. 105 Artifact Inventory ..................................................................................................... 105 Phase I Archeological Investigation of Site 44FQ0313, the Bull Run Mountain House WSSI #22316.01 - December 2013 Page ii LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit 1 : Portion of the 2007 ADC Northern Virginia Regional Map Showing the Location of the Project Area ................................................................ 2 Exhibit 2 : Portion of the USGS 1981 Middleburg, VA 7.5’ Quadrangle Showing the Location of the Project Area ................................................................ 3 Exhibit 3 : Summer 2012 Natural Color Imagery Aerial Photograph Showing the Project Area.......................................................................................... 5 Exhibit 4 : Portion of 1862 McDowell Map of Northeast Virginia and Vicinity of Washington D.C. Showing the Approximate Location of the Project Area ............................................................................................. 20 Exhibit 5 : Portion of 1863 Hotchkiss Map of Fauquier County, Virginia, Showing the Approximate Location of the Project Area ........................................ 21 Exhibit 6 : Portion of 1876 Map of Fauquier County, Virginia, Showing the Approximate Location of the Project Area ........................................ 24 Exhibit 7 : Portion of 1914 Fauquier County, Virginia Board of Trade Map Showing the Approximate Location of the Project Area ......................... 26 Exhibit 8 : Portion of the USGS 1933 Middleburg, VA 15’ Quadrangle Showing the Location of the Project Area .............................................................. 28 Exhibit 9 : Portion of the USGS 1944 Middleburg, VA 15’ Quadrangle Showing the Location of the Project Area .............................................................. 29 Exhibit 10 : Portion of the USGS 1946 Middleburg, VA 7.5’ Quadrangle Showing the Location of the Project Area .............................................................. 30 Exhibit 11 : Portion of the USGS 1968 Middleburg, VA 7.5’ Quadrangle Showing the Location of the Project Area .............................................................. 31 Exhibit 12 : Portion of the USGS 1977 Middleburg, VA 7.5’ Quadrangle Showing the Location of the Project Area .............................................................. 32 Exhibit 13 : DHR Architectural Resources and Archeological Sites Map Showing the Location of the Project Area ............................................... 33 Exhibit 14 : Location of Structures and Cemetery Associated with Site 44FQ0313 ..... 38 Exhibit 15 : Map Showing the Overview of Phase I Testing ......................................... 39 Exhibit 16 : Representative Soil Profiles from Project Area .......................................... 40 Exhibit 17 : Representative Soil Profiles from Project Area .......................................... 42 Exhibit 18 : Historic and Prehistoric Components within Site 44FQ0313 ..................... 47 Exhibit 19 : North Wall Profile of Test Unit 1 ............................................................... 48 Exhibit 20 : West Wall Profile of Test Unit 2.................................................................49 Phase I Archeological Investigation of Site 44FQ0313, the Bull Run Mountain House WSSI #22316.01 - December 2013 Page iii LIST OF PLATES Plate 1: Bull Run Mountain House (Primary Resource of 033-0600) .............................. 63 Plate 2: Fieldstone Marked Cemetery, View to the East .................................................. 63 Plate 3: Well Head for Modern/ Late Historic Well ......................................................... 65 Plate 4: Poured Concrete Privy ......................................................................................... 65 Plate 5: Representative Vegetation ................................................................................... 67 Plate 6: Representative Vegetation ................................................................................... 67 Plate 7: STP 11 (Builder’s Trench) North Profile ............................................................ 69 Plate 8: Disturbances – Hungry Run Road, View to the North ........................................ 71 Plate 9: Disturbances –
Recommended publications
  • Shenandoah River Bridge HAER No. VA-52 Spanning the North Fork Of
    Shenandoah River Bridge HAER No. VA-52 Spanning the North Fork of the Shenandoah River on Virginia State Route 767 .9 mile east of the town of Quicksburg HAf" ^ and .7 mile west of the Valley Turnpike !//""'"* Quicksburg Vicinity /r Shenandoah County ^/9~(^l)iKj^\\ Virginia '""""^ ' ' 'l PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD MID-ATLANTIC REGION, NATIONAL PARK SERVICE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19106 m <? t - A U: HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD Shenandoah River Bridge HAER No. VA-52 Location: Spanning the North Fork of the Shenandoah River on Virginia State Route 767, .9 mile east of the town of Quicksburg and .7 mile west of the Valley Turnpike Quicksburg vicinity, Shenandoah County, Virginia UTM: 17.703180.4284800 Quad: New Market, Virginia Date of Construction: 1916; moved to present location in 1936 Fabricator: Virginia Bridge and Iron Company of Roanoke, Virginia Present Owner: Virginia Department of Transportation 1401 East Broad Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 Significance: The Shenandoah River Bridge is a good example of a riveted steel modified Camelback truss. Project Information: This documentation was undertaken in May 1990 under contract with the Virginia Department of Transportation as a mitigative measure prior to the removal and disposal of the bridge. Luke Boyd Historian A Archaeological Research Center Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia Shenandoah River Bridge HAERNo.VA-52 [Page 2] History of the Shenandoah River Bridge and Crossing The bridge is located on Route 767 over the North Fork of the Shenandoah River in gently rolling farm country. It is approximately seven-tenths of a mile west of the Valley Turnpike, U.
    [Show full text]
  • A TUB to the WHALE": the FOUNDING FATHERS and ADOPTION of the FEDERAL BILL of RIGHTS Kenneth R
    "A TUB TO THE WHALE": THE FOUNDING FATHERS AND ADOPTION OF THE FEDERAL BILL OF RIGHTS Kenneth R. Bowling Seamen have a custom, when they meet a whale, to fling him out an empty tub by way of amusement, to divert him from laying violent hands upon the ship. Jonathan Swift, Tale of a Tub (1704) Like a barrel thrown to the whale, the people were to be amused with fancied amendments, until the harpoon of power, should secure its prey and render resistance ineffectual. [Samuel Bryan], ''Centinel NO. 19, ' ' (Philadel- phia) Independent Gazetteer, October 7, 1788 The constitutional role of the federal Bill of Rights has been monu- mental. This fact would surprise most members of the First Federal Congress, the body which reluctantly proposed to the states the con- stitutional amendments later called the Bill of Rights.' The Federalist Mr. Bowling is a member of the First Federal Congress Project at George Wash- ington University, Washington, D.C. This article is based upon a chapter in his "Politics in the First Congress, 1789-1791" (Ph.D. diss., University of Wisconsin 1968). Additional research was conducted under a grant from the National Endow- ment for the Humanities. ' Although much has been written about the Bill of Rights, very little of it re- lates to the legislative history of its adoption. This is particularly true about the polit- ical aspects, most of which are contained in previously unstudied manuscripts. Robert A. Rutland, The Birth of the Bill of Rights, 1776-1791 (Chapel Hill 1955), which focuses on the background of the amendments, aptly summarizes its passage through the First Federal Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL REGISTER of HISTORIC Placet MULTIPLE PROPERTY
    NFS Form 10-900-b 4-0018 (March 1992) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACEt SHGISfER, HISTORY MULTIPLE PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION F RM NATIONAL PARK SERVICE This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. X New Submission Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing The Civil War in Virginia, 1861-1865: Historic and Archaeological Resources B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) The Civil War in Virginia, 1861-1865: Historic and Archaeological Resources C. Form Prepared by name/title John S. Salmon organization _Virginia Department of Historic Resources street & number 2801 Kensington Avenue telephone 804-367-2323 ext. 117 city or town Richmond_____________ state VA zip code 23221 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation. (__ See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature and title of certifying official Date of tate or FeaeraHgency and ureau I hereby certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related properties for listing in the National Register.
    [Show full text]
  • Federalist Politics and William Marbury's Appointment As Justice of the Peace
    Catholic University Law Review Volume 45 Issue 2 Winter 1996 Article 2 1996 Marbury's Travail: Federalist Politics and William Marbury's Appointment as Justice of the Peace. David F. Forte Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview Recommended Citation David F. Forte, Marbury's Travail: Federalist Politics and William Marbury's Appointment as Justice of the Peace., 45 Cath. U. L. Rev. 349 (1996). Available at: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview/vol45/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CUA Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Catholic University Law Review by an authorized editor of CUA Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLES MARBURY'S TRAVAIL: FEDERALIST POLITICS AND WILLIAM MARBURY'S APPOINTMENT AS JUSTICE OF THE PEACE* David F. Forte** * The author certifies that, to the best of his ability and belief, each citation to unpublished manuscript sources accurately reflects the information or proposition asserted in the text. ** Professor of Law, Cleveland State University. A.B., Harvard University; M.A., Manchester University; Ph.D., University of Toronto; J.D., Columbia University. After four years of research in research libraries throughout the northeast and middle Atlantic states, it is difficult for me to thank the dozens of people who personally took an interest in this work and gave so much of their expertise to its completion. I apologize for the inevita- ble omissions that follow. My thanks to those who reviewed the text and gave me the benefits of their comments and advice: the late George Haskins, Forrest McDonald, Victor Rosenblum, William van Alstyne, Richard Aynes, Ronald Rotunda, James O'Fallon, Deborah Klein, Patricia Mc- Coy, and Steven Gottlieb.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Annual Report | 2 Looking North up the Bull Run Mountains from Thoroughfare Gap
    Virginia Outdoors Foundation’s Bull Run Mountains Natural Area Preserve A view into the Preserve’s forest - photo by Miguel Montalvo 1 | Virginia Outdoors Foundation CONTENTS About the Preserve....................3 Letter from the Preserve Manager.....................................5 Meet the Sta............................6 About Virginia Outdoors Foundation................6 Inaugural Fellowship Program.....................................7 Education & Engagement..............................17 Volunteer Program..................20 Research Highlights................22 Event Highlights......................26 The Preserve as a Community Resource..............28 Join the Movement..................31 Ways to Contribute.................33 Partner Highlights...................36 Closing Remarks......................39 Special Thanks........................42 2020 Annual Report | 2 Looking north up the Bull Run Mountains from Thoroughfare Gap ABOUT BULL RUN MOUNTAINS NATURAL AREA PRESERVE e Bull Run Mountains are the easternmost mountains in Virginia. e Virginia Outdoors Foundation’s (VOF) Bull Run Mountains Natural Area Preserve is approximately 2,350 acres that serves as a living laboratory and open-air museum in the backyard of our nation’s capital. e Preserve contains 10 dierent plant community types and a plethora of regionally uncommon and threatened plant and animal species. In addition to the biodiversity, this land holding permanently protects dozens of regionally important cultural history sites that tell the story of the Preserve’s
    [Show full text]
  • "A Tub to the Whale": the Founding Fathers and Adoption of the Federal Bill of Rights Author(S): Kenneth R
    Society for Historians of the Early American Republic "A Tub to the Whale": The Founding Fathers and Adoption of the Federal Bill of Rights Author(s): Kenneth R. Bowling Reviewed work(s): Source: Journal of the Early Republic, Vol. 8, No. 3 (Autumn, 1988), pp. 223-251 Published by: University of Pennsylvania Press on behalf of the Society for Historians of the Early American Republic Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3123689 . Accessed: 01/03/2012 12:14 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. University of Pennsylvania Press and Society for Historians of the Early American Republic are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of the Early Republic. http://www.jstor.org "A TUB TO THE WHALE": THE FOUNDING FATHERS AND ADOPTION OF THE FEDERAL BILL OF RIGHTS Kenneth R. Bowling Seamenhave a custom, when they meeta whale, tofling him out an emptytub by way of amusement,to divert himfrom laying violent hands upon the ship. Jonathan Swift, Tale of a Tub (1704) Like a barrelthrown to the whale, the people were to be amused with fancied amendments,until the harpoon of power, should secure its prey and render resistanceineffectual.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 216/Tuesday, November 8, 2011
    69198 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 216 / Tuesday, November 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules constitutes a reasonable, good faith providing law enforcement services at the direct link to this docket is posted on interpretation of the statute, taking into casino, which is a commercial activity under the TTB Web site at http://www.ttb.gov/ account the rules in this paragraph (g) paragraph (g)(7)(i)(B) of this section. In wine/wine_rulemaking.shtml under and any other published guidance that addition, the assigned duties and Notice No. 123. You also may view responsibilities of Employee C, as well as copies of this notice, all related relates to the application of section Employee C’s area of expertise, relate to 414(d) to ITGs. However, this paragraph general law enforcement and do not petitions, maps or other supporting (g)(8)(v) applies with respect to the substantially relate to a commercial activity. materials, and any comments TTB assignment of employees to receives about this proposal by [FR Doc. 2011–28858 Filed 11–7–11; 8:45 am] governmental and commercial plans appointment at the TTB Information BILLING CODE 4830–01–P only if the benefit levels provided by the Resource Center, 1310 G Street NW., separate governmental and commercial Washington, DC 20005. Please call 202– plans are uniform. Thus, this paragraph DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 453–2270 to make an appointment. (g)(8)(v) would not apply if the benefit FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: level for employees under a plan Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Elisabeth C. Kann, Regulations and purported to be a governmental plan is Bureau Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco higher than that provided under a Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street separate plan which covers commercial 27 CFR Part 9 NW., Box 12, Washington, DC 20005; ITG employees.
    [Show full text]
  • 8. Terrain and the Battle of Fredericksburg, December 13, 1862
    2. Mesoproterozoic Geology of the Blue Ridge Province in North-Central Virginia: Petrologic and Structural Perspectives on Grenvillian Orogenesis and Paleozoic Tectonic Processes By Richard P. Tollo,1 Christopher M. Bailey,2 Elizabeth A. Borduas,1 and John N. Aleinikoff3 Introduction over the region, produced up to 770 mm (30.3 in) of rain in the vicinity of Graves Mills (near Stops 18 and 19) in northwestern This field trip examines the geology of Grenvillian base- Madison County. During this storm, more than 1,000 shallow ment rocks located within the core of the Blue Ridge anticlin- rock, debris, and soil slides mobilized into debris flows that orium in north-central Virginia over a distance of 64 kilometers were concentrated in northwestern Madison County (Morgan (km) (40 miles (mi)), from near Front Royal at the northern and others, 1999). The debris flows removed large volumes of end of Shenandoah National Park southward to the vicinity of timber, soil, and rock debris, resulting in locally widened chan- Madison. This guide presents results of detailed field mapping, nels in which relatively unweathered bedrock commonly was structural analysis, petrologic and geochemical studies, and iso- exposed. Stops 18 and 19 are located within such channels, and topic investigations of Mesoproterozoic rocks directed toward are typical of the locally very large and unusually fresh expo- developing an understanding of the geologic processes sures produced by the event. Materials transported by debris involved in Grenvillian and Paleozoic orogenesis in the central flows were typically deposited at constrictions in the valley Appalachians. Stops included in this field guide illustrate the pathways or on top of prehistoric fans located at the base of lithologic and structural complexity of rocks constituting local many of the valleys that provided passageways for the flows.
    [Show full text]
  • MIDNIGHT JUDGES KATHRYN Turnu I
    [Vol.109 THE MIDNIGHT JUDGES KATHRYN TuRNu I "The Federalists have retired into the judiciary as a strong- hold . and from that battery all the works of republicanism are to be beaten down and erased." ' This bitter lament of Thomas Jefferson after he had succeeded to the Presidency referred to the final legacy bequeathed him by the Federalist party. Passed during the closing weeks of the Adams administration, the Judiciary Act of 1801 2 pro- vided the Chief Executive with an opportunity to fill new judicial offices carrying tenure for life before his authority ended on March 4, 1801. Because of the last-minute rush in accomplishing this purpose, those men then appointed have since been known by the familiar generic designation, "the midnight judges." This flight of Federalists into the sanctuary of an expanded federal judiciary was, of course, viewed by the Republicans as the last of many partisan outrages, and was to furnish the focus for Republican retaliation once the Jeffersonian Congress convened in the fall of 1801. That the Judiciary Act of 1801 was repealed and the new judges deprived of their new offices in the first of the party battles of the Jeffersonian period is well known. However, the circumstances surrounding the appointment of "the midnight judges" have never been recounted, and even the names of those appointed have vanished from studies of the period. It is the purpose of this Article to provide some further information about the final event of the Federalist decade. A cardinal feature of the Judiciary Act of 1801 was a reform long advocated-the reorganization of the circuit courts.' Under the Judiciary Act of 1789, the judicial districts of the United States had been grouped into three circuits-Eastern, Middle, and Southern-in which circuit court was held by two justices of the Supreme Court (after 1793, by one justice) ' and the district judge of the district in which the court was sitting.5 The Act of 1801 grouped the districts t Assistant Professor of History, Wellesley College.
    [Show full text]
  • The Piedmont View
    The Piedmont View A MEMBERSHIP NEWSLETTER OF THE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL SPRING 2021 CONSERVATION EDITION General Assembly Update Special, Regular, Special...what’s next? Conservation PAGE 2 Totals for 2020 By Dan Holmes, Director of State Policy he last six months has been a whirl- every year. While not fully funded, wind of legislative action. The 2020 her dedication paid off this session. special session extended into mid- The final budget included an addi- October, creating a mad scramble at tional $750,000, bringing the fund itsT conclusion to prepare for the 2021 regular total to $1 million supporting local session. PEC was busy drafting bills and budget Purchase of Development Rights amendments, finding sponsors and having the programs. conversations necessary to set up our initia- While still short of what's The recent session of the Virginia General Assembly tives for success before the new session began needed, additional funding was concluded on March 1. Photo by Marco Sánchez on January 13. The 2021 regular session was allocated to the Agricultural BMP eventually extended into a special session that Cost-Share Program (Ag BMPs), bringing its signed into law. This legislation preserves the concluded on March 1. Throughout, there were total to $65 million. This funding is critical for integrity of existing easements by ensuring countless virtual meetings with partners and meeting our pollution reduction goals for the that disputes over terms are decided in favor of History at the legislators and virtual testimony to relevant Chesapeake Bay, supporting such measures the conservation purpose of the easement. Top of Bull Run house and senate committees.
    [Show full text]
  • Village Plans
    Fauquier County Comprehensive Plan Chapter 7: Village Plans Adopted May 10, 2007 Chapter 7: Village Plans Overall Goals • Maintain the unique, visual identity of Fauquier County’s villages and incorporate new development in a way that complements existing communities. • Conserve, protect and, where possible, restore village cultural resources to maintain unique, livable communities while preserving these assets for future generations. Overall Strategy • Develop community-initiated plans that address the following for each village: cultural resource protection, the environment, development, transportation, and heritage tourism. Introduction countywide policies as they apply to the villages, and introduces strategies for future community- based The villages stand as records of Fauquier County’s plans to preserve each village as its own unique place. European settlement story from colonial times up to the present day. The villages also function as living The 1977 Plan neighborhoods with homes, small stores, and local businesses. The major challenge confronting each of The previous plan for the County’s villages was these villages in the near future is how to balance approved in 1977 at a time when the county had only contemporary needs and the possibility of additional 32,700 residents. In 2006, there were 65,000 development with how to retain enough of a flavor of residents. Much of the housing built to accommodate the past that each village sustains its own special these new residents has been realized in the service identity. districts, but a significant amount has appeared in areas planned for agriculture and resource Each village is unique, but they all share one common conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Scenic Byway Information for Waterfall Road, Antioch Road
    Proposed Scenic Byway Information for Waterfall Road, Antioch Road and John Marshall Highway (Route 55) The Prince William Conservation Alliance (Conserve Prince William) along with residents of the Haymarket community would like to request scenic byway designation for connecting portions of Waterfall Road, Antioch Road, and John Marshall Highway (Route 55) in Haymarket, VA. These roads pass through areas that highlight the unique qualities of Prince William County, and showcase the environmental, cultural, and historical treasures that the local community has to offer. The proposed scenic byway begins at the intersection of Hopewell Road and Waterfall Road at the county line between Prince William and Fauquier Counties. From this point, the proposed byway would continue east down Waterfall Road (601), until it intersects with Antioch Road. The byway would then continue South down Antioch Road, until it meets with John Marshall Highway (Route 55). From here, the proposed byway will continue West down John Marshall Highway, and come to an end right before Beverleys Mill Road at the border between Prince William and Fauquier counties. US Interstate 66 and James Madison Highway (US 15) are both in close proximity to the proposed scenic byway. Highlighting Route 55 and Antioch Road as a scenic byway will give tourists and locals the option of driving on “the road less traveled,” and provide an escape from the busy highways through an area thriving with natural and historical beauty. With its idyllic view of the Bull Run Mountains, working farms, and historic homes and churches, this scenic byway truly shows some of the unique qualities that Prince William County has to offer.
    [Show full text]