Experimental Study on Vascular Differentiation in the Shoot Apices of Herbaceous Dicotyledons

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Experimental Study on Vascular Differentiation in the Shoot Apices of Herbaceous Dicotyledons EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON VASCULAR DIFFERENTIATION IN THE SHOOT APICES OF HERBACEOUS DICOTYLEDONS A Thesis Submitted tu the College of Graduate Studies and Research in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Biology University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon Bu QUN XIA Sprfng, 1997 O Copy right Qun Xia, 1997. Al1 rights reserved. National Library Bibliothèque nationale 1*1 of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographic Sewices services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. rue Wellington OttawaON U1AON4 Ottawa ON KlA ON4 Canada Canada Your Ne Votre nifdmce Our lSle Notre rdf6renca The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distniiute or sell reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microfom, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous . paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/nlm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fkom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWW College of Graduate Studies and Research SLùWARY OF DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILûSOPHY by Xia, Qun Deparmnt of Biology University of Saskatchewan Spring 1997 Examining Cornni ttee : Dr. J. F. Basinger ~/~~$~X~/Deanls Designate, Chair College of Graduate Studies and Research Dr. L. C. Fowke Chair of Advisory Committee, Department of Biology Dr. T. A. Steeves Supervisor, Department of Biology Dr. W. M. Kulyk Department of Anatomy Dr. V. K. Sawhney Department of Biology Dr. M. W. Zink Department of Biology External Eluminet : Dr. Usher Posluszny Department of Botany University of Guelph Guelph, Ontario N1G 2Wl Experimental study on vaacular differentiatfon in the shoot apicea of herbaceoue dicotyledonrp Vascular differentiation has been experimentally investigated in the shoot apex of carrot (D~UCUScdl~ta L. ) . AS in f erns, there is initial vascular tissue---provascular tissue---in the shoot apex. A distinct provascular ring was observed in the shoot apex of carrot and extended above the attachent of the youngest leaf trace when this could be identified in the late plastochron. Histochemical tests indicate that carboxylesterase, which is mainly characteristic of vascular tissue, is present in this tissue. Surgical experiments further reveal that, as in fems, the formation of provascular tissue is independent of the leaf primordia, but that unlike ferns,! further maturation of the provascular tissue depends upon an influence from the leaf prixnordia. Finally, auxin replacement experiments reveal that IAA produced the developing leaf primordia is one of the influences that affect the maturation of provascular tissue. Exogenous IAA applied in lanolin or more effectively in resin beads, enhanced provascular tissue developrnent and promoted the final maturation of vascular tissue. These results suggest that there is insufficient IAA for vascular maturation in the shoot apex when leaf primordia are suppressed and support the hypothesis that auxin production has shifted £rom axial to lateral centres in the evolution of seed plants. Furthemore, the surgical experiments have been extended to two other dicotyledons, potato (Solarium tuberosum L.) and lupin (Lupinus albus L.). Although there are variations in the normal shoot apices in these two species, the result of suppression of leaf primordia is similar to that in carrot. In conclusion, the difference of the present results Erom comparable observations in ferns, in which the final maturation of vascular tissue from provascular tissue does not require the influence of leaf primordia, is interpreted as a reflection of the long separation of fern and seed plant evolutionary lines. PREMïSSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Postgraduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, 1 agree that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. 1 further agree that permission for copying of this thesis in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis work, or in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which the thesis work was done. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis. Requests for permission to copy or to rnake other use of material in this thesis in whole or in part should be addressed to: Head of the Department of Biology University of Saskatchewan 112 Science Place, Saskatoon Saskatchewan, CRNAClA S7N 5E2 ABSTRACT Early vascular differentiation has been experirnentally investigated in the shoot apex of carrot(Daucus carota L. var, sativa DC.) . As in ferns, there is initial vascular tissue--provascular tissue--in the shoot apex. A distinct provascular ring was observed in the shoot apex of carrot and extended above the attachent of the youngest leaf trace when this could be identified in the late plastochron. Histo- chernical tests indicate that carboxylesterase, which is mainly characteristic of vascular tissue, is present in this tissue. Surgical experiments further reveal that, as in ferns, the formation of provascular tissue is independent of the leaf primordia, but that unlike ferns, further maturation of the provascular tissue depends upon an influence from the leaf primordia. Finally, auxin replacement experiments reveal that IAA produced by the developing leaf primordia is one of the influences that affect the maturation of provas- cular tissue. Exogenous IAA applied in lanolin or more ef fectively in resin beads, enhanced provascular tissue development and promoted the final maturation of vascular tissue. These results suggest that there is insufficient IAA for vascular maturation in the shoot apex when leaf primordia are suppressed and support the hypothesis that auxin produc- tion has shifted from axial to lateral centres in the ev-o- lution of seed plants. Furthemore, the surgical experiments have been extended to two other dicotyledons, potato (Solarium tuberosum L. ) and lupin (Lupinus albus L. ) . Aithough there are variations in the normal shoot apices in these two species, the result of suppression of leaf prirnordia is similar to that in carrot. In conclusion, the difference of the present results from comparable observations in ferns, in which the final maturation of vascular tissue from provas- cular tissue does not require the influence of leaf primordia, is interpreted as a reflection of the long separation of fern and seed plant evolutionary lines. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1 would like to express rny gratitude and many thanks to Dr. Taylor A. Steeves for his guidance, encouragement, support, and patience throughout the course of this program. I wish to thank the members of my advisory codttee, Drs. L. C. Fowke, W. M. Kulyk, V, K. Sawhey and M. W. Zink for their valuable comments and guidance on rny thesis. 1 sincerely acknowledge the financial support of a scholarship from the University of Saskatchewan. I thank Dr. A. Davis for providing his laboratory equipment to continue my seemingly endless work after the retirement of Dr. T. A. Steeves. 1 also thank the following people for technical assistance: Mr. Dennis Dyck for his help with photography, Mr. Yukio Yano for the technical assistance in electron microscopy, Mrs. Jeaniene Smith for the culture of plants, and Mrs. Yang, Xiuli for providing technical assistance with microscopy and histochernical tests. 1 also would like to thank my colleagues, Mr. Fawzi Razem and Mr. Prakash Venglat for their help, encouragement and stimulating discussions. 1 am also indebted to Mr & Mrs George Goetz, Mr & Mrs Reg Pope and Dr & Mrs Craig Campbell for their friendship. A special acknowledgement goes to Mr. Ivan CS. McArthur and Dr. Yilun Ma whose work on a dicityledous Geum chiloense and a fern Matteuccia struthiopteris respectively provided a base for the present comparative study. TABLE OF CONTENTS PERMISSIONTO USE ................i ABSTRACT ....................... ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................... iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................v LISTOFTABLES .................... xii LIST OF FIGURES ...................xiv LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ....m........ ...XXV Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION ............... 1 1.1 Evolution of the vascular system ..........2 1.2 Development of the vascular system .........8 1.2.1 Shoot apex and vascular differentiation . 10 1.2.2 Defoliation and vascular differentiation . 12 1.2.3 Auxin and vascular differentiation ..... 16 1.2.3-1 Auxin control of vascular differentiation ............ 16 1.2.3.1.1 Studies in angiosperms .... 16 1.2.3.1.2 Studies in ferns ....... 21 1.2.3.2 Auxin in early vascular differentiation ............ 23 1.2.3.2.1 Studies in angiosperms .... 23 1.2.3.2.2 Studies in ferns ....... 27 1.3 Objectives .................... 29 Chapter 2 INITIAL VASCULAR DIFFERENTIATION IN THE SHOOT APEX OF CARROT ...... 31 2.1 Introduction ................... 31 2.1.1 Initial vascular differentiation ...... 31 2.1.2 Esterases and early differentiation .... 33 2.1.3 Terminology in the study of the shoot apex . 35 2.1.4 Aim of the study .............. 40 2.2 Materials and methods ............... 42 2.2.1 Materials and growth condition ....... 42 2.2.2 Light and scanning electron rnicroscopy ... 42 2.2.3Histochemistry. .............. 44 2.2.3.1 Fresh frozen sections ........ 44 2.2.3.2 Paraffin embedded sections ..... 45 2.2.3.3 Incubation for esterase activity .
Recommended publications
  • Plant Terminology
    PLANT TERMINOLOGY Plant terminology for the identification of plants is a necessary evil in order to be more exact, to cut down on lengthy descriptions, and of course to use the more professional texts. I have tried to keep the terminology in the database fairly simple but there is no choice in using many descriptive terms. The following slides deal with the most commonly used terms (more specialized terms are given in family descriptions where needed). Professional texts vary from fairly friendly to down-right difficult in their use of terminology. Do not be dismayed if a plant or plant part does not seem to fit any given term, or that some terms seem to be vague or have more than one definition – that’s life. In addition this subject has deep historical roots and plant terminology has evolved with the science although some authors have not. There are many texts that define and illustrate plant terminology – I use Plant Identification Terminology, An illustrated Glossary by Harris and Harris (see CREDITS) and others. Most plant books have at least some terms defined. To really begin to appreciate the diversity of plants, a good text on plant systematics or Classification is a necessity. PLANT TERMS - Typical Plant - Introduction [V. Max Brown] Plant Shoot System of Plant – stem, leaves and flowers. This is the photosynthetic part of the plant using CO2 (from the air) and light to produce food which is used by the plant and stored in the Root System. The shoot system is also the reproductive part of the plant forming flowers (highly modified leaves); however some plants also have forms of asexual reproduction The stem is composed of Nodes (points of origin for leaves and branches) and Internodes Root System of Plant – supports the plant, stores food and uptakes water and minerals used in the shoot System PLANT TERMS - Typical Perfect Flower [V.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on Seed Germination, Seedling Growth, and in Vitro Shoot
    HORTSCIENCE 44(3):751–756. 2009. plantlets are detached from the mother plant that are dried and planted. However, seed propagation is more feasible and recommen- Studies on Seed Germination, Seedling ded for survival of rare species (Van Wyk and Smith, 1996). If this species has to be Growth, and In Vitro Shoot Induction propagated on a large scale by means of seed or tissue culture methods, then currently there of Aloe ferox Mill., a Commercially is no basic information available on these aspects. Aloes are succulent and warm-cli- mate plants, where both temperature and Important Species water play an important role in establishing Michael W. Bairu, Manoj G. Kulkarni, Rene´e A. Street, Rofhiwa them. This study was therefore conducted to B. Mulaudzi, and Johannes Van Staden1 examine 1) the effects of different temper- atures, growth-promoting substances, and Research Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of Biological watering frequencies on seed germination and Conservation Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg, and seedling growth of A. ferox; and 2) to Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa assess the applicability of an in vitro propa- gation protocol developed for other Aloe spp. Additional index words. cytokinins, growth regulators, multiplication rate, smoke solutions, temperature, tissue culture Materials and Methods Abstract. A study was done to investigate the effects of some physical and chemical factors on growth and development of Aloe ferox ex vitro and in vitro. The effects of light, Seed collection. Dried seeds of A. ferox temperature, and smoke–water on seed germination, ex vitro seedling growth require- were collected between the middle to the end ments, and effect of germination medium and cytokinins on shoot induction and of August from the Botanical Garden, Uni- multiplication in vitro were investigated.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5: the Shoot System I: the Stem
    Chapter 5 The Shoot System I: The Stem THE FUNCTIONS AND ORGANIZATION OF THE SHOOT SYSTEM PRIMARY GROWTH AND STEM ANATOMY Primary Tissues of Dicot Stems Develop from the Primary Meristems The Distribution of the Primary Vascular Bundles Depends on the Position of Leaves Primary Growth Differs in Monocot and Dicot Stems SECONDARY GROWTH AND THE ANATOMY OF WOOD Secondary Xylem and Phloem Develop from Vascular Cambium Wood Is Composed of Secondary Xylem Gymnosperm Wood Differs from Angiosperm Wood Bark Is Composed of Secondary Phloem and Periderm Buds Are Compressed Branches Waiting to Elongate Some Monocot Stems Have Secondary Growth STEM MODIFICATIONS FOR SPECIAL FUNCTIONS THE ECONOMIC VALUE OF WOODY STEMS SUMMARY ECONOMIC BOTANY: How Do You Make A Barrel? 1 KEY CONCEPTS 1. The shoot system is composed of the stem and its lateral appendages: leaves, buds, and flowers. Leaves are arranged in different patterns (phyllotaxis): alternate, opposite, whorled, and spiral. 2. Stems provide support to the leaves, buds, and flowers. They conduct water and nutrients and produce new cells in meristems (shoot apical meristem, primary and secondary meristems). 3. Dicot stems and monocot stems are usually different. Dicot stems tend to have vascular bundles distributed in a ring, whereas in monocot stems they tend to be scattered. 4. Stems are composed of the following: epidermis, cortex and pith, xylem and phloem, and periderm. 5. Secondary xylem is formed by the division of cells in the vascular cambium and is called wood. The bark is composed of all of the tissues outside the vascular cambium, including the periderm (formed from cork cambium) and the secondary phloem.
    [Show full text]
  • Fruits and Seeds of Genera in the Subfamily Faboideae (Fabaceae)
    Fruits and Seeds of United States Department of Genera in the Subfamily Agriculture Agricultural Faboideae (Fabaceae) Research Service Technical Bulletin Number 1890 Volume I December 2003 United States Department of Agriculture Fruits and Seeds of Agricultural Research Genera in the Subfamily Service Technical Bulletin Faboideae (Fabaceae) Number 1890 Volume I Joseph H. Kirkbride, Jr., Charles R. Gunn, and Anna L. Weitzman Fruits of A, Centrolobium paraense E.L.R. Tulasne. B, Laburnum anagyroides F.K. Medikus. C, Adesmia boronoides J.D. Hooker. D, Hippocrepis comosa, C. Linnaeus. E, Campylotropis macrocarpa (A.A. von Bunge) A. Rehder. F, Mucuna urens (C. Linnaeus) F.K. Medikus. G, Phaseolus polystachios (C. Linnaeus) N.L. Britton, E.E. Stern, & F. Poggenburg. H, Medicago orbicularis (C. Linnaeus) B. Bartalini. I, Riedeliella graciliflora H.A.T. Harms. J, Medicago arabica (C. Linnaeus) W. Hudson. Kirkbride is a research botanist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, BARC West Room 304, Building 011A, Beltsville, MD, 20705-2350 (email = [email protected]). Gunn is a botanist (retired) from Brevard, NC (email = [email protected]). Weitzman is a botanist with the Smithsonian Institution, Department of Botany, Washington, DC. Abstract Kirkbride, Joseph H., Jr., Charles R. Gunn, and Anna L radicle junction, Crotalarieae, cuticle, Cytiseae, Weitzman. 2003. Fruits and seeds of genera in the subfamily Dalbergieae, Daleeae, dehiscence, DELTA, Desmodieae, Faboideae (Fabaceae). U. S. Department of Agriculture, Dipteryxeae, distribution, embryo, embryonic axis, en- Technical Bulletin No. 1890, 1,212 pp. docarp, endosperm, epicarp, epicotyl, Euchresteae, Fabeae, fracture line, follicle, funiculus, Galegeae, Genisteae, Technical identification of fruits and seeds of the economi- gynophore, halo, Hedysareae, hilar groove, hilar groove cally important legume plant family (Fabaceae or lips, hilum, Hypocalypteae, hypocotyl, indehiscent, Leguminosae) is often required of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • PHASEOLUS LESSON ONE PHASEOLUS and the FABACEAE INTRODUCTION to the FABACEAE
    1 PHASEOLUS LESSON ONE PHASEOLUS and the FABACEAE In this lesson we will begin our study of the GENUS Phaseolus, a member of the Fabaceae family. The Fabaceae are also known as the Legume Family. We will learn about this family, the Fabaceae and some of the other LEGUMES. When we study about the GENUS and family a plant belongs to, we are studying its TAXONOMY. For this lesson to be complete you must: ___________ do everything in bold print; ___________ answer the questions at the end of the lesson; ___________ complete the world map at the end of the lesson; ___________ complete the table at the end of the lesson; ___________ learn to identify the different members of the Fabaceae (use the study materials at www.geauga4h.org); and ___________ complete one of the projects at the end of the lesson. Parts of the lesson are in underlined and/or in a different print. Younger members can ignore these parts. WORDS PRINTED IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS may be new vocabulary words. For help, see the glossary at the end of the lesson. INTRODUCTION TO THE FABACEAE The genus Phaseolus is part of the Fabaceae, or the Pea or Legume Family. This family is also known as the Leguminosae. TAXONOMISTS have different opinions on naming the family and how to treat the family. Members of the Fabaceae are HERBS, SHRUBS and TREES. Most of the members have alternate compound leaves. The FRUIT is usually a LEGUME, also called a pod. Members of the Fabaceae are often called LEGUMES. Legume crops like chickpeas, dry beans, dry peas, faba beans, lentils and lupine commonly have root nodules inhabited by beneficial bacteria called rhizobia.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Pathology
    Plant Pathology 330-1 Reading / Reference Materials CSU Extension Fact Sheets o Aspen and poplar leaf spots – #2.920 o Backyard orchard: apples and pears [pest management] – #2.800 o Backyard orchard: stone fruits [pest management] – #2.804 o Bacterial wetwood – #2.910 o Cytospora canker – #2.937 o Diseases of roses in Colorado – #2.946 o Dollar spot disease of turfgrass – #2.933 o Dutch elm disease – #5.506 o Dwarf mistletoe management – #2.925 o Fairy ring in turfgrass – #2.908 o Fire blight – #2.907 o Forest fire – Insects and diseases associated with forest fires – #6.309 o Friendly pesticides for home gardens – #2.945 o Greenhouse plant viruses (TSWV-INSV) – #2.947 o Honeylocust diseases – #2.939 o Juniper-hawthorn rust – #2.904 o Juniper-hawthorn rust – #2.904 o Leaf spot and melting out diseases – #2.909 o Necrotic ring spot in turfgrass – #2.900 o Non-chemical disease control – #2.903 o Pesticides – Friendly pesticides for home gardens – #2.945 o Pinyon pine insects and diseases – #2.948 o Powdery mildew – #2.902 o Roses – Diseases of roses in Colorado – #2.946 o Russian olive decline and gummosis – #2.942 o Strawberry diseases – #2.931 o Sycamore anthracnose – #2.930 CSU Extension Publications o Insects and diseases of woody plants of the central Rockies – 506A Curriculum developed by Mary Small, CSU Extension, Jefferson County • Colorado State University, U.S. Department of Agriculture and Colorado counties cooperating. • CSU Extension programs are available to all without discrimination. • No endorsement of products named is intended, nor is criticism implied of products not mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Principal Types of Vegetative Shoot Apex Organization in Vascular Plants1
    PRINCIPAL TYPES OF VEGETATIVE SHOOT APEX ORGANIZATION IN VASCULAR PLANTS1 RICHARD A. POPHAM Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, The Ohio State University, Columbus 10 Before progress can be made in research, a problem must be recognized. Once the problem has been perceived, a research program may be directed toward a solution. The problem of how and where a shoot grows and the organization of the shoot apex was apparently first conceived by Kaspar Friedrich Wolff (1759). Although his observations on the structure, formation, and growth of cells were fantastically inaccurate, he made a great contribution to our knowledge of the growing plant by setting forth a new and important problem. In a very real sense, Wolff is the father of developmental plant anatomy. Disagreement is the life blood of many research problems. Strenuous opposition is often engendered by a dogmatic statement or a theory which is proposed as a universal truth. Opposition to Wolff's (1759) original proposition regarding the organization and growth of shoot apices prompted plant anatomists, some 85 years later, to investigate the truth of the statement. The factual solution of the problem of shoot apex organization had its beginnings in the work of Nageli (1845). Following this work on many lower cryptogams, Nageli concluded that the cells of all tissues of the shoot of cryptogams and higher plants have their genesis in a single apical cell. The new-born apical cell theory supported by Hofmeister (1851) and others provided the impetus for a renewed, vigorous attack on the problem of shoot apex organization. A little later a new proposal, Hanstein's (1868) histogen theory was born of more careful observations and in a mind unfettered by the prevailing fanaticism of the apical cell theorists.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal 50(2)
    JOURNAL OF PLANT PROTECTION RESEARCH Vol. 50, No. 2 (2010) EFFECT OF VARIOUS HOST-PLANTS ON THE POPULATION GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE PEA APHID Sylwia Goławska* University of Podlasie, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Prusa 12, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland Received: November 11, 2009 Accepted: May 6, 2010 Abstract: The performance of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris (Homoptera: Aphididae) was studied on several Fabaceae species including: pea (Pisum sativum), broad bean (Vicia faba), alfalfa (Medicago sativa), bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and red clover (Tri- folium pratense). Alfalfa, bean and red clover were less accepted by the pea aphid than pea and broad bean. The pea aphid fed on the alfalfa, bean and red clover showed longer pre-reproductive, and shorter reproductive and post-reproductive periods. Alfalfa, bean and red clover also shortened and decreased fecundity of the pea aphid. Mean survival of the pea aphids fed on red clover and bean plants was reduced in comparison to pea aphid fed on pea and broad bean. The other studied population parameters: intrinsic rate of natural increase (rm), net reproduction (R0) and mean generation time were also reduced in the case of the pea aphid on alfalfa, red clover and bean. The study of aphid development and reproduction demonstrated that pea and broad bean are suitable host plants for A. pisum while alfalfa, red clover and bean are not. It is likely that the rejection of alfalfa, red clover and bean by A. pisum was caused by chemical factors in these hosts. Key words: Acyrthosiphon pisum, Fabaceae, development time, rm, R0, T INTRODUCTION 1999; Via and Shaw 1996; Peccoud et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Shoot Disease of Cranberry
    Cranberry Pest Management Red Shoot Disease of Cranberry Red shoot, caused by the fungus Symptoms and spindly with red or yellow Exobasidium perenne, is a rela- leaves that are slightly more tively minor disease of the culti- Signs round than typical oblong cran- vated American cranberry Symptoms Þrst appear in the berry leaves (Figures 1Ð3). By (Vaccinium macrocarpon) and the spring on current yearÕs shoots mid summer the lower surfaces wild small cranberry (Vaccinium that occur singly or as a cluster of leaves become covered with oxycoccus). The red shoot fun- arising from a node on a buried white, powdery fungal spores. gus is related to the fungus that runner. Affected shoots do not Shoots wither after the fungus causes red leaf spot. Red shoot produce ßowers but rather are has shed its spores. Diseased has been reported in Wisconsin, shoots break off easily from the Massachusetts, the PaciÞc Northwest, and in the Atlantic maritime provinces of Canada. Red shoot is not an economi- cally important disease, and speciÞc control recommenda- tions have not been developed. However, the distorted, red or yellow shoots have sometimes been misidentiÞed as a weed, making growers think that an herbicide should be applied. The fact that red shoot is a dis- ease has been conÞrmed by tak- ing fungal spores from infected plants and inoculating them Figure1. Clusters of red shoot in a bed of ‘Searles’. The orangish-rust col- onto healthy plants; the inocu- ored shoots to the left are not affected by red shoot, but rather a different lated plants then developed red problem such as upright dieback.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetative Vs. Reproductive Morphology
    Today’s lecture: plant morphology Vegetative vs. reproductive morphology Vegetative morphology Growth, development, photosynthesis, support Not involved in sexual reproduction Reproductive morphology Sexual reproduction Vegetative morphology: seeds Seed = a dormant young plant in which development is arrested. Cotyledon (seed leaf) = leaf developed at the first node of the embryonic stem; present in the seed prior to germination. Vegetative morphology: roots Water and mineral uptake radicle primary roots stem secondary roots taproot fibrous roots adventitious roots Vegetative morphology: roots Modified roots Symbiosis/parasitism Food storage stem secondary roots Increase nutrient Allow dormancy adventitious roots availability Facilitate vegetative spread Vegetative morphology: stems plumule primary shoot Support, vertical elongation apical bud node internode leaf lateral (axillary) bud lateral shoot stipule Vegetative morphology: stems Vascular tissue = specialized cells transporting water and nutrients Secondary growth = vascular cell division, resulting in increased girth Vegetative morphology: stems Secondary growth = vascular cell division, resulting in increased girth Vegetative morphology: stems Modified stems Asexual (vegetative) reproduction Stolon: above ground Rhizome: below ground Stems elongating laterally, producing adventitious roots and lateral shoots Vegetative morphology: stems Modified stems Food storage Bulb: leaves are storage organs Corm: stem is storage organ Stems not elongating, packed with carbohydrates Vegetative
    [Show full text]
  • Pruning Fruit Trees: Rules of Shoot Growth
    Pruning Fruit Trees: Rules of Shoot Growth Pruning fruit trees is usually perceived as a very difficult task for the inexperienced. This is due primarily to the uncertainty involved in deciding what to prune, where to cut, and how much wood to remove. Pruning decisions can be made much easier if we know the way a tree grows naturally. The purpose of this article is to present some basic principles and observations on shoot growth. While these rules were developed with tree fruit in mind, they are generally applicable to deciduous trees in the landscape. Rules of Shoot Growth 1. If two branches are identical in length, and diameter, and they emerge from the tree trunk at the same location, they will have the same growth potential. Such limbs have comparable hormone levels, leaf area, and they will receive comparable nutrients and growth promoting substances from the roots. 2. The steeper the angle of a branch, the more vigorously it will grow, provided all the other conditions are identical. This rule is especially important since it gives you, the pruner, a glimpse into the future about growth potential of limbs in a tree. Upright limbs, which form an angle with the trunk of 30 degrees or less, are apt to be too vigorous, grow inappropriately large, and by the nature of their vigor, be quite unproductive. Conversely, a limb that is flat and forms an angle of 90 degrees or more with the trunk will be weak and display little if any terminal growth. Further, vigorous upright shoots may grow from these flat limbs, and pose contin-ual problems in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • "Effect of Photoperiod and Shoot Decapitation on Flowering Of
    J. AMER. Soc. HORT. SCI. 115(1):131-135. 1990. Effect of Photoperiod and Shoot Decapitation on Flowering of Leucospermum ‘Red Sunset’ Daniel G. Malan1 and Gerard Jacobs Department of Horticulture, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, 7600, South Africa Additional index words. short-day plant, night break Abstract. Incandescent light night break (NB) and day continuation (DC) prevented flower formation in Leucosper- mum R.Br. CV. Red Sunset. Natural short days (NSD) during winter were inductive for flowering of intact shoots until 28 Aug. (Southern Hemisphere), but only until 24 July for decapitated shoots. Vegetative axillary buds released from correlative inhibition by shoot decapitation were less responsive to inductive short days (SD) than distal axillary buds on intact shoots. At least 42 inductive SD cycles were required for normal flowering after cessation of shoot growth. The effective length of the NB depended on the length of the NSD of winter. A 2-hr NB prevented flowering in vegetative buds released from correlative inhibition by shoot decapitation on 3 Mar., but was inadequate for axillary buds on shoots decapitated on 1 May. When the NB was begun during winter and discontinued before natural day (ND) lengths became too long in spring, the flowering time was delayed. Vegetative and reproductive growth of Leucospermum CV. cence development occurs during winter (May to September), Red Sunset (Proteaceae) follow a seasonal sequence. Plants grow and the flowers open in early spring (September to October). vegetatively during late spring and summer (November to March, The inflorescence is a capitulum arising from an axillary bud Southern Hemisphere) and individual shoots have strong apical distally situated on a shoot (Jacobs, 1985).
    [Show full text]