DOCSLIB.ORG

Bird Sanctuary Management Plan.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bird Sanctuary Management Plan.Pdf 01 May 2018 Nunavut Wildlife Management Board 3rd Floor Allavik Building P.O. Box 1379 Iqaluit, NU X0A 0H0 Email: [email protected] Pertaining to NWMB’s Regular Meeting No. RM 002-2018: Final Draft Management Plan for the Ahiak Migratory Bird Sanctuary for Consideration by the NWMB for Approval The Ahiak (Queen Maud Gulf) Migratory Bird Sanctuary, located between Umingmaktok, Cambridge Bay and Gjoa Haven in the Kitikmeot region of Nunavut, was created in 1961. Through the Nunavut Agreement, an Inuit Impact and Benefit Agreement for National Wildlife Areas and Migratory Bird Sanctuaries in the Nunavut Settlement Area (IIBA) was signed by Nunavut Tunngavik Inc., the three Regional Inuit Associations (Kitikmeot Inuit Association, Kivalliq Inuit Association and Qikiqtani Inuit Association) and the federal Minister of the Environment, Environment and Climate Change Canada (signed first in 2006 and renegotiated in 2016). This IIBA created co-management committees for these protected areas in Nunavut (IIBA Article 3). The Ahiak Migratory Bird Sanctuary is co-managed by Inuit (from Umingmaktok, Cambridge Bay and Gjoa Haven) and the Canadian Wildlife Service (a part of Environment and Climate Change Canada) through the Ahiak Area Co-Management Committee. Part of the mandate of the Ahiak Area Co-Management Committee is to develop a Management Plan for the Ahiak Migratory Bird Sanctuary (IIBA s. 3.2.3(b) and s. 3.5). The Ahiak Area Co- Management Committee completed a draft Management Plan and consulted with the associated communities and other interested parties on the draft (IIBA s. 3.5). As per the IIBA, 3.6.1 The ACMCs [Area Co-Management Committees] shall recommend completed Management Plans to the NWMB [Nunavut Wildlife Management Board] for approval in accordance with sections 5.2.34(c) and 5.3.16 of the NLCA [Nunavut Agreement]. 3.6.3 If, in accordance with the decision-making process set forth in subsection 5.2.34(c) and sections 5.3.17 through 5.3.23 of the NLCA, the NWMB or the Minister rejects, in whole or part, a completed Management Plan and the Plan is returned to an ACMC for reconsideration, the relevant ACMC shall re-consider the Plan and re-submit it to the NWMB. 1 The Ahiak Area Co-Management committee hereby recommends to the NWMB for approval the attached Final Draft Management Plan for the Ahiak Migratory Bird Sanctuary, in accordance with the Nunavut Wildlife Management Board’s decision-making role for Conservation Area management plans. Sincerely, Kitty Taipagak Jennie Rausch Chair Vice-chair Ahiak Area Co-Management Committee for the Ahiak Migratory Bird Sanctuary Attachments: 1. Document “Management Plan for the Ahiak Migratory Bird Sanctuary: Final Draft for NWMB Approval” 2. Summary presentation of the “Management Plan for the Ahiak Migratory Bird Sanctuary: Final Draft for NWMB Approval” 3. Copy of the “2016 to 2023 Inuit Impact and Benefit Agreement for National Wildlife Areas and Migratory Bird Sanctuaries in the Nunavut Settlement Area” cc. Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated: Qilak Kusugak and Pacome Lloyd Kitikmeot Inuit Association: Paul Emingak and Fred Pedersen 2 ᐊᕼᐃᐊᖅᒥ (ᐆᔪᓕᖕᒥ) ᑎᖕᒥᐊᖃᕐᕕᖕᒥ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑏᑦ: ᑭᖑᓕᕐᐹᖅ ᐊᓯᔨᒐᒃᓴᐅᔪᖅ ᑐᕋᖓᔪᖅ ᐅᕗᖓ ᓄᓇᕗᕐᒥ ᐅᒪᔪᓕᕆᔨᕐᔪᐊᑯᑦ ᑲᑎᒪᔨᖏᑕ ᓇᒪᒋᔭᐅᓂᖓ AHIAK (QUEEN MAUD GULF) MIGRATORY BIRD SANCTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN: Final Draft for Nunavut Wildlife Management Board Approval ᓄᓇᕗᕐᒥ ᐅᒪᔪᓕᕆᔨᕐᔪᐊᑯᑦ Nunavut Wildlife Management ᑲᑎᒪᔨᖏᑕ ᑲᑎᖓᓂᖓ ᑲᑎᖓᓂᐅᑉ Board Regular Meeting No. RM ᓈᓴᐅᑖ RM 002-2018 002-2018 ᐃᖃᓗᐃᑦ, ᓄᓇᕗᑦ Iqaluit, Nunavut ᔪᓂ 6, 2018ᒥ June 6, 2018 ᑕᒪᐃᓐᓂᒃ ᐅᓂᒃᑳᓴᑲᐃᓐᓇᕐᓗᒋᑦ Outline of this presentation ᖃᐅᔨᒪᑎᑦᑎᔾᔪᑎᒃᓴᐃᑦ Information on protected areas in ᓴᐳᓐᓂᐊᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᓂᖏᓐᓂᒃ ᓄᓇᐃᑦ Nunavut ᓄᓇᕗᒻᒥ Show you the content of the Final ᑕᑯᑎᑦᑎᔪᒪᓂᖅ ᐃᓗᓕᖏᓐᓂᒃ Draft Management Plan for the ᑎᑎᕋᖅᑕᐅᓵᖅᓯᒪᔪᓂᒃ Ahiak MBS ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᔾᔪᑎᒃᓴᐅᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᒃᓴᓂᒃ ᐊᕼᐃᐊᖅᒥ ᑎᖕᒥᐊᖃᕐᕕᖕᒥ ᖃᐅᔨᒪᑎᑦᑎᒋᐊᕈᑏᑦ ᑲᓇᑕᓕᒪᒥ ᐆᒪᔪᖃᕐᕕᐅᑎᑕᐅᔪᓂᒃ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᑎᖕᒥᐊᖃᕐᕕᐅᑎᑕᐅᔪᓂᒃ ᓄᓇᕗᒻᒥ Information on National Wildlife Areas and Migratory Bird Sanctuaries in Nunavut ᐊᕙᑎᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ ᑲᓇᑕᒥ ᓴᐳᓐᓂᐊᕐᕕᐅᑎᑕᖏᑦ ᓄᓇᐃᑦ ᖃᓄᐃᓕᖓᓂᖏᑦ Environment Canada’s Protected Areas Network ᐱᔾᔪᑕᐅᓂᖏᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᖑᔪᐃᓐᓇᐅᓂᖏᓐᓂ: ᓴᐳᓐᓂᐊᖅᑕᐅᓂᖅ, ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᓂᖏᑦ, ᑐᑭᓯᑎᑦᑎᒋᐊᕈᑕᐅᔪᓐᓇᕐᓂᖏᓪᓗ ᖃᓄᐃᑦᑑᓂᖏᓂᒃ ᓴᕿᑎᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᑲᓇᑕᓕᒫᒥ ᐱᐅᓯᑐᖃᕐᒥᒍᑦ ᐆᒪᔪᖃᕐᕕᐅᑎᑕᐅᔪᓂᒃ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᑎᖕᒥᐊᖃᕐᕕᐅᓂᖏᓐᓂᒃ ᐃᓕᑕᕆᔭᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ Purpose of Network: Conservation, research, and interpretation Made of National Wildlife Areas (NWA) and Migratory Bird Sanctuaries (MBS) ᐊᕙᑎᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ ᑲᓇᑕᒥ ᓴᐳᓐᓂᐊᕐᕕᐅᑎᑕᖏᑦ ᓄᓇᐃᑦ ᖃᓄᐃᓕᖓᓂᖏᑦ Environment Canada’s Protected Areas Network ᑎᖕᒥᐊᖃᕐᕕᑦ ᐅᒪᔪᖃᕐᕕᑦ ᑕᒪᕐᒥᒃ ᑲᑎᓗᒋᑦ 92-ᖑᔪᑦ ᑲᓇᑕᒥ 55-ᖑᔪᑦ ᑲᓇᑕᒥ 118, 000 km2 10, 000 km2 ᑕᒪᕐᒥᒃ ᐊᖏᓂᖏᑦ ᑭᓛᒥᑕᓕᖕᒥ ᑭᓛᒥᑕᓕᖕᒥ ᓴᐳᓂᐊᕈᑕᐅᓂᖏᑦ ᑎᖕᒥᐊᑦ ᓄᓇᒥᐅᑕᐃᑦ ᐆᒪᔪᐃᑦ ᐅᓪᓗᖃᕐᕕᖏᑦ ᓴᐳᓂᐊᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᕕᖏᑦ ᐊᕐᕋᒍᓕᒫᖅ /ᐃᕙᕕᖏᑦ/ ᓄᓕᐊᕐᕕᖏᑦ ᑎᖕᒥᐊᕐᓕᕆᓂᕐᒥᒃ ᑲᓇᑕᒥ ᐆᒪᔪᓕᕆᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᒪᓕᒐᖅᑎᒍᑦ ᑲᑎᒪᕐᔪᐊᕈᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᒪᓕᒐᐃᑦ ᒪᓕᒐᐃᑦ MBS NWA Total Number 92 in Canada 55 in Canada Total Area 118, 000 km2 10, 000 km2 Protection Focus Migratory birds All terrestrial wildlife Protection Period Nesting/breeding season Year-round Migratory Birds Legal Basis Canada Wildlife Act Convention Act ᐊᕙᑎᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ ᑲᓇᑕᒥ ᓴᐳᓐᓂᐊᕐᕕᐅᑎᑕᖏᑦ ᓄᓇᐃᑦ ᖃᓄᐃᓕᖓᓂᖏᑦ Environment Canada Protected Areas in Nunavut 5 ᑕᓪᓕᒪᐅᔪᑦ ᐆᒪᔪᖃᕐᕕᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ 11-ᖑᔪᑦ ᑎᖕᒥᐊᖃᕐᕖᑦ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᐊᒃᑐᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᓂᖏᑦ ᐃᑲᔫᓯᐊᒃᓴᖏᓄᓪᓗ ᐊᖏᕈᑎᖃᖅᐳᑦ ᐱᓪᓗᒋᑦ ᑲᓇᑕᓕᒫᒥ ᐆᒪᔪᖃᕐᕕᐅᑎᑕᐅᓂᖏᓐᓄᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᑎᖕᒥᐊᖃᕐᕕᐅᑎᑕᐅᓂᖏᓐᓄᑦ ᓄᓇᕗᒻᒥ ᓄᓇᑖᕐᕕᐅᓯᒪᓂᖏᓐᓂ (2008; 2016) 5 NWAs and 11 MBSs Inuit Impact and Benefit Agreement for National Wildlife Areas and Migratory Bird Sanctuaries in the Nunavut Settlement Area (2008; 2016) ᐊᕙᑎᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ ᑲᓇᑕᒥ ᓴᐳᓐᓂᐊᕐᕕᐅᑎᑕᖏᑦ ᓄᓇᐃᑦ ᖃᓄᐃᓕᖓᓂᖏᑦ Environment Canada Protected Areas in Nunavut ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᐊᒃᑐᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᓂᖏᑦ Inuit Impact and Benefit Agreement ᐃᑲᔫᓯᐊᒃᓴᖏᓄᓪᓗ ᐊᖏᕈᑎᖃᖅᐳᑦ for National Wildlife Areas and ᐱᓪᓗᒋᑦ ᑲᓇᑕᓕᒫᒥ Migratory Bird Sanctuaries in the ᐆᒪᔪᖃᕐᕕᐅᑎᑕᐅᓂᖏᓐᓄᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ Nunavut Settlement Area (2006; ᑎᖕᒥᐊᖃᕐᕕᐅᑎᑕᐅᓂᖏᓐᓄᑦ 2016) ᓄᓇᕗᒻᒥ ᓄᓇᑖᕐᕕᐅᓯᒪᓂᖏᓐᓂ (2006; 2016) Guarantees co-management of Migratory Bird Sanctuary and ᐃᓕᑕᕆᔭᐅᓯᒪᕗᑦ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᔨᐅᖃᑕᐅᔭᕆᐊᖃᕐᓂᖏᑦ National Wildlife Areas ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᑎᖕᒥᐊᖃᕐᕕᖕᓂᒃ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ Decisions for Migratory Bird ᐆᒪᔪᖃᕐᕕᐅᔪᓂᒃ Sanctuaries and National Wildlife ᐃᓱᒪᓕᐅᕈᑕᐅᕙᒃᑐᑦ ᐱᔾᔪᑎᖃᖅᑐᑦ Areas strongly influenced by Inuit ᐆᒪᔪᖃᕐᕕᖕᓂᒃ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ Qaujimajatuqangit ᑎᖕᒥᐊᖃᕐᕕᖕᓂᒃ ᓴᖏᔪᒥᒃ ᐃᒃᐱᒍᓱᒋᐊᖃᖅᐳᑦ ᑕᐃᒃᑯᓂᖓ Important feature: Area Co- ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᒪᔭᑐᖃᖏᓐᓂᒃ Management Committees ᐱᒻᒪᕆᐅᓂᖏᑦ ᐃᓚᒋᔭᐅᖃᑕᐅᓂᖏᑦ ᐊᖏᕈᑎᓄᑦ: ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᔨᐅᖃᑕᐅᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᑲᑎᒪᔨᕋᓛᖃᕐᓂᖏᑦ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᔨᐅᖃᑕᐅᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᑲᑎᒪᔨᕋᓚᑦ Area Comanagement Committees (ACMCs) 9-ᖑᔪᑦ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᔨᐅᖃᑕᐅᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᑲᑎᒪᔨᕋᓛᖑᖕᒥᔪᑦ ᓄᓇᕗᒻᒥ, ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᔨᐅᖃᑕᐅᖕᒪᑕ 16-ᖑᔪᓂᒃ ᓴᐳᓐᓂᐊᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᕝᕕᐅᔪᓂᒃ ᓄᓇᓂᒃ ᐃᓚᖃᖅᑐᑦ ᑕᓪᓕᒪᓂᒃ 5 ᐃᓄᖕᓂᒃ ᓄᓇᓕᖕᓂ ᐃᑲᔫᓯᐊᒃᓴᓕᕆᔨᐅᔪᓂᒃ ᑲᑎᒪᔨᕋᓛᖏᓐᓂᒃ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐊᑕᐅᓯᕐᒥᒃ 1 ᑲᓇᑕᒥ ᐆᒪᔪᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ ᐱᔨᑦᑎᕋᐃᔨᖏᓐᓂᖔᖅᓯᒪᔪᒥᒃ (ᐊᕙᑎᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᓐᓂᒃ ᑲᓇᑕᒥ) 9 ACMCs were created in Nunavut to co-manage the 16 protected areas Made up of 5 people from the Community Beneficiary Committees and 1 from Canadian Wildlife Service (Environment Canada) ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᔨᐅᖃᑕᐅᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᑲᑎᒪᔨᕋᓚᑦ Area Comanagement Committees (ACMCs) ᐊᕼᐃᐊᖅᒧᑦ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᔨᐅᖃᑕᐅᓂᕐᒧᑦ Ahiak ACMC was formed in 2010 ᑲᑎᒪᔨᕋᓚᖏᑦ ᐱᓐᖑᖅᑎᑕᐅᓚᐅᖅᓯᒪᔪᑦ 2010-ᖑᑎᓪᓗᒍ Ahiak ACMC members: ᐊᕼᐃᐊᖅᒥᒃ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᔨᐅᖃᑕᐅᓂᕐᒧᑦ 2 members from Cambridge Bay ᑲᑎᒪᔨᕋᓚᖏᑦ ᐅᑯᐊᖑᕗᑦ: Kitty Taipagak David Evalik 2 ᒪᕐᕉᖕᓂᒃ ᑲᑎᒪᔨᖃᖅᑐᑦ ᐃᖃᓗᒃᑑᑦᑎᐊᕐᓂᒃ: 1 member representing Umingmaktok ᑭᑎ ᑕᐃᐸᒐᖅ Joseph Tikhak, Sr. ᑏᕕᑦ ᐃᕙᓕᒃ 2 members from Gjoa Haven 1 ᐊᑕᐅᓯᕐᒥᒃ ᑲᑎᒪᔨᓖᑦ ᑭᒡᒐᖅᑐᐃᔪᒥᒃ Simona Akkikungaq ᐅᒥᖕᒪᒃᑑᕐᒥᐅᓂᒃ Ben Putuguq ᔫᓯᐱ ᑎᒃᕼᐊᖅ, ᐊᖓᔪᒃᓯᖅ 1 member from Canadian Wildlife Service, 2 ᒪᕐᕉᖕᓂᒃ ᑲᑎᒪᔨᖃᖅᑐᑦ ᐅᖅᓱᖅᑑᕐᒥᒃ Yellowknife ᓯᒨᓇ ᐊᑭᑯᖕᓇᖅ Jennie Rausch Bᐃᐊᓐ ᐳᑐᒍᖅ 1 ᐊᑕᐅᓯᕐᒥᒃ ᑲᑎᒪᔨᖃᖅᑐᑦ ᑲᓇᑕᒥ ᐅᒪᔪᓕᕆᔩᑦ ᐱᔨᑦᑎᕋᐃᔨᖏᓐᓂ, ᔭᓗᓇᐃᒥ ᔭᓂ ᕋᐅᔅ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᔨᐅᖃᑕᐅᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᑲᑎᒪᔨᕋᓚᑦ Area Comanagement Committees (ACMCs) ᑲᒪᔨᐅᕙᒃᐳᑦ ᒪᑯᓂᖓ: ᖃᐅᑕᒫᖅᓯᐅᑎᓂᒃ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᕙᓪᓕᐊᓂᕐᒥᒃ ᑎᖕᒥᐊᖃᕐᕕᖕᓂᒃ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐆᒪᔪᖃᕐᕕᖕᓂᒃ ᕿᒥᕐᕈᐊᖅᑎᐅᕙᖕᓂᖅ ᐱᔪᓐᓇᐅᑎᑖᕋᓱᐊᖅᑐᓂᒃ ᐆᒃᑐᕈᑎᓂᒃ ᑎᑎᕋᖃᑕᕐᓂᖅ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᔾᔪᑎᒃᓴᖏᓐᓂᒃ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᒋᓂᐊᖅᑕᖏᓐᓂᒃ ᐊᑐᕐᓂᐊᖅᑐᓂᒃ ᑎᖕᒥᐊᖃᕐᕕᖕᓄᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐆᒪᔪᖃᕐᕕᖕᓄᑦ Responsible for: Day to day management of the protected area Reviewing permit applications ᐊᕼᐃᐊᖅᒥ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᔨᐅᖃᑕᐅᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᑲᑎᒪᔨᕋᓛᖏᑦ ᐃᒡᓗᕋᓛᕐᒦᑦᑐᑦ ᐊᕼᐃᐊᑉ ᑎᖕᒥᐊᖃᕐᕕᖓᓐᓂ (2012) Writing a management plan for the Ahiak ACMC in a cabin in the Ahiak MBS (2012) protected area ᐊᐅᓚᑕᐅᓂᕆᓂᐊᖅᑕᖏᓐᓄᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑏᑦ Management Plans ᐱᑕᖃᕈᑕᐅᓂᖏᑦ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᔾᔪᑎᒃᓴᓄᑦ Purpose of Management Plans: ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑏᑦ: Allows the Area Co-Management ᐱᔪᓐᓇᖅᑎᑕᐅᓗᑎᒃ Committees to share their vision of ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᔨᐅᖃᑕᐅᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᑲᑎᒪᔨᕋᓚᑦ the protected area ᐅᖃᐅᓯᖃᕈᓐᓇᕐᓂᖅ ᑕᑯᑎᑦᑎᔪᓐᓇᕐᓂᕐᓗ Guides decision making for the ᑕᐅᑐᒐᕆᔭᖏᓐᓂᒃ protected area ᖃᓄᐃᓕᖓᔭᕆᐊᖃᕐᓂᖏᓐᓂᒃ ᓴᐳᓐᓂᐊᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ Describes important cultural and environmental aspects ᓇᓗᓇᐃᒃᑯᑕᕆᔭᐅᓂᐊᕐᒪᑕ ᐃᓱᒪᓕᐅᕈᑕᐅᔭᕆᐊᖃᖅᐸᖕᓂᐊᖅᑐᓄᑦ States which activities are permitted ᓴᐳᓐᓂᐊᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᓂᒃ ᓄᓇᓂᒃ and not permitted ᐱᔾᔪᑎᖃᖅᑐᓂᖅ ᐅᓂᒃᑳᖅᐸᒃᑐᑦ ᐱᒻᒪᕆᐅᓂᖏᓐᓂᒃ ᐃᓕᖅᑯᓯᑐᖃᕐᒥᒍᑦ ᐊᕙᑎᖏᓐᓂᓪᓗ ᖃᓄᐃᓕᖓᓂᖏᓐᓂᒃ ᐅᓂᒃᑳᖅᓯᒪᑦᑎᐊᖅᑐᑦ ᖃᓄᖅ ᐱᓕᕆᕕᐅᔪᓐᓇᕐᓂᖏᓐᓂᒃ ᓄᓇᖏᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᖃᓄᖅ ᐱᓕᕆᕕᐅᔪᓐᓇᓐᖏᓐᓂᖏᓐᓂᒃ ᓄᓇᖏᑦ ᐊᐅᓚᑕᐅᓂᕆᓂᐊᖅᑕᖏᓐᓄᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑏᑦ: ᐱᓕᕆᐊᖑᕙᓪᓕᐊᓂᖏᑦ Management Plans: Steps ᐱᕙᓪᓕᐊᓂᖏᓐᓂ ᓯᕗᓕᖅ 1 Step 1 ᖃᐅᔨᒪᔾᔪᑎᒃᓴᕆᓂᐊᖅᑕᖏᓂᒃ ᑲᑎᖅᓱᐃᓂᖅ Collect Information ᐱᕙᓪᓕᐊᓂᖏᓐᓂ ᑐᒡᓕᖅ 2 Step 2 ᑐᑭᓕᐅᖅᑕᐅᓗᑎᒃ ᑕᐅᑐᒐᕆᔭᐅᔪᑦ ᓯᕗᓂᒃᓴᒧᑦ, Articulate Vision, Goals, and Objectives ᑐᕌᒐᕆᔭᐅᔪᑦ, ᐃᓂᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᓂᐊᖅᑐᓪᓗ ᐱᕙᓪᓕᐊᓂᖏᓐᓂ ᐱᖓᔪᖓᑦ 3 Step 3 ᑎᑎᕋᖅᑕᐅᕙᓪᓕᐊᓗᑎᒃ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᓂᕆᓂᐊᖅᑕᖏᓐᓄᑦ Draft the Management Plan ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᒃᓴᖏᑦ ᐱᕙᓪᓕᐊᓂᖏᓐᓂᒃ ᓯᑕᒪᖓᑦ 4 Step 4 ᓄᓇᓕᖕᓂ ᑲᑎᒪᓂᑎᑦᑎᓂᖏᑦ ᐱᔾᔪᑎᒋᓗᒋᑦ Community Meetings ᑎᑎᕋᖅᑕᐅᓵᖅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᔾᔪᑎᒃᓴᓄᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᖏᓐᓂᒃ about the draft Management Plan Step 5 ᐱᕙᓪᓕᐊᓂᖏᓐᓂ ᑕᓪᓕᒪᖓᑦ 5 ᑕᒫᓃᓕᖅᑐᒍᑦ ᒫᓐᓇ Where we are ᓄᓇᕗᒻᒥ ᐆᒪᔪᓕᕆᔨᕐᔪᐊᒃᑯᑦ ᑲᑎᒪᔨᖏᓐᓄᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ Nunavut Wildlife Management Board and ᑲᓇᑕᐅᑉ ᒥᓂᔅᑕᖓᓄᑦ ᐊᕙᑎᓕᕆᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐊᖏᕈᑕᐅᓗᑎᒃ federal Minister of the Environment Approvals ᐊᑐᓕᖅᑎᑕᐅᓗᑎᒃ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᔾᔪᑎᒃᓴᐃᑦ Implement the Management Plan ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᖏᑦ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᔾᔪᑎᒃᓴᓄᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᔭᐅᓂᖓ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᔾᔪᑎᒃᓴᓄᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᑦ ᐊᖏᖅᑕᔭᕆᐊᖃᕐᓂᖓᓄ MANAGEMENT PLAN PREPARATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN APPROVAL ᐅᕙᖔᕐᑐᑦ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᐊᒃᑐᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᓂᖏᑦ ᐃᑲᔫᓯᐊᒃᓴᖏᓄᓪᓗ ᐊᖏᕈᑎᖃᖅᐳᑦ ᐱᓪᓗᒋᑦ ᑲᓇᑕᓕᒫᒥ ᐆᒪᔪᖃᕐᕕᐅᑎᑕᐅᓂᖏᓐᓄᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᑎᖕᒥᐊᖃᕐᕕᐅᑎᑕᐅᓂᖏᓐᓄᑦ ᓄᓇᕗᒻᒥ ᓄᓇᑖᕐᕕᐅᓯᒪᓂᖏᓐᓂ : From the Inuit Impact and Benefit Agreement for National Wildlife Areas and Migratory Bird Sanctuaries in the Nunavut Settlement Area: ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᔾᔪᑎᒃᓴᓄᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᔭᐅᓂᖓ MANAGEMENT PLAN 3.5.1 ᑕᒪᕐᒥᒃ
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ramsar Sites in Order of Addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance
    Ramsar sites in order of addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance RS# Country Site Name Desig’n Date 1 Australia Cobourg Peninsula 8-May-74 2 Finland Aspskär 28-May-74 3 Finland Söderskär and Långören 28-May-74 4 Finland Björkör and Lågskär 28-May-74 5 Finland Signilskär 28-May-74 6 Finland Valassaaret and Björkögrunden 28-May-74 7 Finland Krunnit 28-May-74 8 Finland Ruskis 28-May-74 9 Finland Viikki 28-May-74 10 Finland Suomujärvi - Patvinsuo 28-May-74 11 Finland Martimoaapa - Lumiaapa 28-May-74 12 Finland Koitilaiskaira 28-May-74 13 Norway Åkersvika 9-Jul-74 14 Sweden Falsterbo - Foteviken 5-Dec-74 15 Sweden Klingavälsån - Krankesjön 5-Dec-74 16 Sweden Helgeån 5-Dec-74 17 Sweden Ottenby 5-Dec-74 18 Sweden Öland, eastern coastal areas 5-Dec-74 19 Sweden Getterön 5-Dec-74 20 Sweden Store Mosse and Kävsjön 5-Dec-74 21 Sweden Gotland, east coast 5-Dec-74 22 Sweden Hornborgasjön 5-Dec-74 23 Sweden Tåkern 5-Dec-74 24 Sweden Kvismaren 5-Dec-74 25 Sweden Hjälstaviken 5-Dec-74 26 Sweden Ånnsjön 5-Dec-74 27 Sweden Gammelstadsviken 5-Dec-74 28 Sweden Persöfjärden 5-Dec-74 29 Sweden Tärnasjön 5-Dec-74 30 Sweden Tjålmejaure - Laisdalen 5-Dec-74 31 Sweden Laidaure 5-Dec-74 32 Sweden Sjaunja 5-Dec-74 33 Sweden Tavvavuoma 5-Dec-74 34 South Africa De Hoop Vlei 12-Mar-75 35 South Africa Barberspan 12-Mar-75 36 Iran, I. R.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesser Snow Goose EN
    Introduction This bird • has evolved a strong serrated bill and tongue to cut and tear the roots of bulrushes and sedges • often has a rusty orange face, because its feathers have been stained by iron in the earth where the bird feeds • is probably the most abundant goose in Canada • unlike most other waterfowl, usually nests in large colonies with densities of up to 2 000 pairs per square kilometre Description The Lesser Snow Goose Chen caerulescens caerulescens has two different appearances, white phase and blue phase. The plumage of white-phase geese is almost completely white, except for black wing tips. The blue-phase goose has a white head, a bluish colour on the feathers of the lower back and flanks, and a body that ranges in colour from very pale, almost white, to very dark. Both the white- and blue-phase snow geese frequently have rusty orange faces, because their feathers have been stained by iron in the earth where the birds feed. The downy goslings of the white-phase geese are yellow, those of the blue phase nearly black. By two months of age the young birds of both colour phases are grey with black wing tips, although the immature blue-phase birds are generally a darker grey and have some light feathers on the chin and throat, which can become stained like those of the adults. The goslings have mostly lost their grey coloring by the following spring; in April and May they may only show a few flecks of darker coloring on their head and neck, and a few grey feathers on their wings that distinguish them from adults.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft – 2016 3.1.2 Territorial Parks Awaiting Full Establishment (Maps 70-84) - PA
    Draft – 2016 3.1.2 Territorial Parks Awaiting Full Establishment (Maps 70-84) - PA .................................................................. 51 Chapter 1: Introduction...................................... 7 3.1.3 Proposed National Parks .................................... 51 1.1 How to Use This Document ...............................7 3.1.4 Proposed Territorial Parks (Maps 70-84) - PA...... 51 3.2 Proposed Lancaster Sound National Marine 1.2 Purpose ............................................................7 Conservation Areas (Map 85) - PA .........................52 1.3 How Land Use Decisions Were Made .................7 3.3 Conservation Areas .........................................52 1.4 Options for Land Use Policy ...............................7 3.3.1 Thelon Wildlife Sanctuary (Map 86) - PA............. 52 1.4.1 Option 1- Protected Area (PA).............................. 8 3.3.2 Migratory Bird Sanctuaries (Maps 87-99) - PA .... 53 1.4.2 Option 2 - Special Management Area (SMA)......... 8 3.3.3 National Wildlife Areas (Maps 95-99) - PA .......... 57 1.4.3 Option 3 - Mixed Use (MU) .................................. 8 3.4 Historic Sites (Maps 100-114) - PA ...................60 1.4.4 Option 4 – Information on Valued Components (VCs) ............................................................................ 8 3.5 Heritage Rivers (Maps 115-119) – PA, VEC, & VSEC ....................................................................61 1.5 Considered Information ....................................8 3.5.1 Recommendation
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Standing Committee on Legislation Hearings on Bill 25, an Act To
    Standing Committee on Legislation ᒪᓕᒐᓕᕆᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᑲᑎᒪᔨᕋᓛᑦ Hearings on Bill 25, An Act to Amend the ᕿᒥᕐᕈᓂᖏᑦ ᒪᓕᒐᕐᒥᒃ ᐋᖅᑭᒋᐊᖅᑕᐅᖁᓪᓗᒍ Education Act and the Inuit Language ᐃᓕᓐᓂᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᒪᓕᒐᖅ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ Protection Act ᐅᖃᐅᓯᖓ ᓴᐳᒻᒥᔭᐅᓂᖓᓄᑦ ᒪᓕᒐᖅ Iqaluit, Nunavut ᐃᖃᓗᐃᑦ, ᓄᓇᕗᑦ November 26, 2019 ᓄᕕᐱᕆ 26, 2019 Members Present: ᒪᓕᒐᓕᐅᖅᑏᑦ ᐅᐸᒃᑐᑦ: Tony Akoak ᑑᓂ ᐋᖁᐊᖅ Pat Angnakak ᐹᑦ ᐊᕐᓇᒃᑲᖅ Joelie Kaernerk ᔪᐃᓕ ᖃᐃᕐᓂᖅ Mila Kamingoak ᒦᓚ ᖃᒥᓐᖑᐊᖅ Pauloosie Keyootak ᐸᐅᓗᓯ ᕿᔪᒃᑖᖅ Adam Lightstone ᐋᑕᒻ ᓚᐃᑦᓯᑑᓐ John Main, Chair ᐋᕐᓗᒃ ᒪᐃᓐ, ᐃᒃᓯᕙᐅᑕᖅ Margaret Nakashuk ᓯᒥᐅᓐ ᒥᑭᓐᖑᐊᖅ David Qamaniq ᒫᒡᒍᓚ ᓇᑲᓱᒃ Emiliano Qirngnuq ᑕᐃᕕᑎ ᖃᒪᓂᖅ Paul Quassa ᐃᒥᓕᐊᓄ ᕿᓐᖑᖅ Allan Rumbolt ᐹᓪ ᖁᐊᓴ Cathy Towtongie, Co-Chair ᐋᓚᓐ ᕋᒻᐴᑦ ᖄᑕᓂ ᑕᐅᑐᓐᖏ, ᐃᒃᓯᕙᐅᑕᐅᖃᑕᐅᔪᖅ Staff Members: ᐃᖅᑲᓇᐃᔭᖅᑏᑦ: Michael Chandler ᒪᐃᑯᓪ ᓵᓐᑐᓗ Stephen Innuksuk ᓯᑏᕙᓐ ᐃᓄᒃᓱᒃ Siobhan Moss ᓯᕚᓐ ᒫᔅ Interpreters: ᑐᓵᔩᑦ: Lisa Ipeelee ᓖᓴ ᐊᐃᐱᓕ Andrew Dialla ᐋᓐᑐᓘ ᑎᐊᓚ Attima Hadlari ᐊᑏᒪ ᕼᐊᑦᓚᕆ Allan Maghagak ᐋᓚᓐ ᒪᒃᕼᐊᒐᒃ Philip Paneak ᐱᓕᑉ ᐸᓂᐊᖅ Blandina Tulugarjuk ᐸᓚᓐᑏᓇ ᑐᓗᒑᕐᔪᒃ Witnesses: Melissa Alexander, Manager of Planning, ᐊᐱᖅᓱᖅᑕᐅᔪᑦ: Reporting and Evaluation, Department of ᒪᓕᓴ ᐋᓕᒃᓵᓐᑐ, ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᔨ ᐸᕐᓇᓐᓂᕐᒧᑦ, Education ᐅᓂᒃᑳᓕᐅᕐᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕐᓂᕐᒧᑦ, Jack Ameralik, Vice-Chairman, Gjoa Haven ᐃᓕᓐᓂᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ District Education Authority ᔮᒃ ᐊᒥᕋᓕᒃ, ᐃᒃᓯᕙᐅᑕᐅᑉ ᑐᓪᓕᐊ, ᐅᖅᓱᖅᑑᒥ James Arreak, Interim Executive Director, ᐃᓕᓐᓂᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ ᑲᑎᒪᔨᖏᑦ Coalition of Nunavut District Education ᔭᐃᒥᓯ ᐋᕆᐊᒃ, ᑐᑭᒧᐊᖅᑎᑦᑎᔨᒻᒪᕆᐅᑲᐃᓐᓇᖅᑐᖅ, Authorities ᑭᒡᒐᖅᑐᐃᔨᖏᑦ ᐃᓕᓐᓂᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ ᓄᓇᕘᒥ 1 Okalik Eegeesiak, Board Member, Iqaluit ᐅᑲᓕᖅ ᐃᔨᑦᓯᐊᖅ, ᑲᑎᒪᔨᐅᖃᑕᐅᔪᖅ, ᐃᖃᓗᓐᓂ District Education Authority ᐃᓕᓐᓂᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ ᑲᑎᒪᔨᖏᑦ John Fanjoy, President,
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Assessment of Marbled Murrelets in British Columbia, a Review of the Biology, Populations, Habitat Associations and Conservation
    Conservation Assessment of Marbled Murrelets in British Columbia, A Review of the Biology, Populations, Habitat Associations and Conservation Alan E. Burger Pacific and Yukon Region 2002 Canadian Wildlife Service Environmental Conservation Branch Technical Report Series Number 387 Environment Environnement Canada Canada Canadian Wildlife Service Canadien qwewrt Service de la faune TECHNICAL REPORT SERIES CANADIAN WILDLIFE SERVICE This series of reports, established in 1986, contains technical and scientific information from projects of the Canadian Wildlife Service. The reports are intended to make available material that either is of interest to a limited audience or is too extensive to be accommodated in scientific journals or in existing CWS series. Demand for these Technical Reports is usually confined to specialists in the fields concerned. Consequently, they are produced regionally and in small quantities; they can be obtained only from the address given on the back of the title page. However, they are numbered nationally. The recommended citation appears on the title page. Technical Reports are available in CWS libraries and are listed in the catalogue of the National Library of Canada in scientific libraries across Canada. They are printed in the official language chosen by the author to meet the language preference of the likely audience, with a résumé in the second official language. To determine whether there is significant demand for making the reports available in the second official language, CWS invites users to specify their official language preference. Requests for Technical Reports in the second official language should be sent to the address on the back of the title page. SÉRIE DE RAPPORTS TECHNIQUES DU SERVICE CANADIEN DE LA FAUNE Cette série de rapports donnant des informations scientifiques et techniques sur les projets du Service canadien de la faune (SCF) a démarré en 1986.
    [Show full text]
  • Abandonment and Restoration Plan for Karrak Lake Research Station and F-14 Satellite Camp, Nunavut
    Abandonment and Restoration Plan for Karrak Lake Research Station, F-14 Satellite Camp (Karrak River Camp), and Perry River Camp, Nunavut January 2015 This amended Abandonment and Restoration Plan is in effect as of 1 May 2015. It applies specifically to lands under administration of Environment Canada, located at: Karrak Lake Research Station: 67º 14’ 14” N and 100º 15’ 33” W F-14 Satellite Camp: 67º 21’ 09” N and 100º 20’ 59” W Perry River Camp: 67º 41’ 41” N and 102º 11’ 27” W Final Restoration The final restoration at both of the above-mentioned locations will commence once research programs are complete. All work under this plan will be complete prior to the date of expiry of all water licenses, land use, and sanctuary entrance permits. Photos of restored areas will be taken. The details of restoration are as follows: Fuel cache: All fuels (jet a, gasoline, naphtha, lubricating oils and fluids) and empty drums will be removed from the site. Contaminated soil, if present, will be handled as stated in the Spill Contingency Plan. Buildings: All buildings on sites are constructed of lumber, and will be combusted. Open burning is currently not permitted as per Land Use Permit N2014N0021 or Water License 3BC-KAR1316, but as per discussions with Sean Joseph (NWB) and Eva Paul (AANDC) in November-December 2014, we will request permission for open burning of painted lumber for a specified period upon abandonment of sites. Chemicals, metals, and other non-combustible materials: All chemicals such as paints, adhesives, etc., of which there is very little, will be removed from the site.
    [Show full text]
  • EXPERIENCES 2021 Table of Contents
    NUNAVUT EXPERIENCES 2021 Table of Contents Arts & Culture Alianait Arts Festival Qaggiavuut! Toonik Tyme Festival Uasau Soap Nunavut Development Corporation Nunatta Sunakkutaangit Museum Malikkaat Carvings Nunavut Aqsarniit Hotel And Conference Centre Adventure Arctic Bay Adventures Adventure Canada Arctic Kingdom Bathurst Inlet Lodge Black Feather Eagle-Eye Tours The Great Canadian Travel Group Igloo Tourism & Outfitting Hakongak Outfitting Inukpak Outfitting North Winds Expeditions Parks Canada Arctic Wilderness Guiding and Outfitting Tikippugut Kool Runnings Quark Expeditions Nunavut Brewing Company Kivalliq Wildlife Adventures Inc. Illu B&B Eyos Expeditions Baffin Safari About Nunavut Airlines Canadian North Calm Air Travel Agents Far Horizons Anderson Vacations Top of the World Travel p uit O erat In ed Iᓇᓄᕗᑦ *denotes an n u q u ju Inuit operated nn tau ut Aula company About Nunavut Nunavut “Our Land” 2021 marks the 22nd anniversary of Nunavut becoming Canada’s newest territory. The word “Nunavut” means “Our Land” in Inuktut, the language of the Inuit, who represent 85 per cent of Nunavut’s resident’s. The creation of Nunavut as Canada’s third territory had its origins in a desire by Inuit got more say in their future. The first formal presentation of the idea – The Nunavut Proposal – was made to Ottawa in 1976. More than two decades later, in February 1999, Nunavut’s first 19 Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs) were elected to a five year term. Shortly after, those MLAs chose one of their own, lawyer Paul Okalik, to be the first Premier. The resulting government is a public one; all may vote - Inuit and non-Inuit, but the outcomes reflect Inuit values.
    [Show full text]
  • 198 13. Repulse Bay. This Is an Important Summer Area for Seals
    198 13. Repulse Bay. This is an important summer area for seals (Canadian Wildlife Service 1972) and a primary seal-hunting area for Repulse Bay. 14. Roes Welcome Sound. This is an important concentration area for ringed seals and an important hunting area for Repulse Bay. Marine traffic, materials staging, and construction of the crossing could displace seals or degrade their habitat. 15. Southampton-Coats Island. The southern coastal area of Southampton Island is an important concentration area for ringed seals and is the primary ringed and bearded seal hunting area for the Coral Harbour Inuit. Fisher and Evans Straits and all coasts of Coats Island are important seal-hunting areas in late summer and early fall. Marine traffic, materials staging, and construction of the crossing could displace seals or degrade their habitat. 16.7.2 Communities Affected Communities that could be affected by impacts on seal populations are Resolute and, to a lesser degree, Spence Bay, Chesterfield Inlet, and Gjoa Haven. Effects on Arctic Bay would be minor. Coral Harbour and Repulse Bay could be affected if the Quebec route were chosen. Seal meat makes up the most important part of the diet in Resolute, Spence Bay, Coral Harbour, Repulse Bay, and Arctic Bay. It is a secondary, but still important food in Chesterfield Inlet and Gjoa Haven. Seal skins are an important source of income for Spence Bay, Resolute, Coral Harbour, Repulse Bay, and Arctic Bay and a less important income source for Chesterfield Inlet and Gjoa Haven. 16.7.3 Data Gaps Major data gaps concerning impacts on seal populations are: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 9834.21 NTI Fall 12-09-21 3:05 PM Page 1
    9834.21 NTI_Fall 12-09-21 3:05 PM Page 1 ᓄᓇᕗᑦ ᑐᓐᖓᕕᒃᑯᑦ ᑎᒥᖓᑕ ᑐᓴᕋᒃᓴᓕᐊᖏᑦ | A Publication of Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. | Titigakhimayait Nunavut Tunngavik Timinga ᐅᑭᐊᒃᓵᖅ | FALL | UKIAKHAK 2012 N•oN A NIILIQPITA 6Wb ᓴᓇᔭᐅᓂᖓ ᓄᓇᕗᒥ ᓄᓇᑖᕐᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐊᖏᕈᑏᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᒃᑯᑕᖓ The Making of the NLCA Monument Hananiga NLCA-mik Itkaomayotimik 9834.21 NTI_Fall 12-09-21 3:05 PM Page 2 N•oN A NIILIQPITA6Wb ᖃᓄᖅ ᐃᓱᒪᒋᕕᐅᒃ ᐅᖃᓕᒫᒐᖅᐳᑦ, ᓇᓃᓕᖅᐱᑕ? ᐊᔾᔨᖁᑎᖃᖅᐲᑦ, ᐅᕝᕙᓘᓐᓃᑦ ᐃᓱᒪᒋᔭᕐᓂᒃ ᐅᓂᒃᑳᑦᓴᕐᒥᒃ, ᑎᑎᕋᖅᑕᐅᓂᐊᖅᑐᓂᒡᓘᓐᓃᑦ? ᓇᒃᓯᐅᑎᓗᒋᑦ ᐅᕙᑦᑎᓐᓄᑦ ᐃᓱᒪᒋᔭᑎᑦ, ᐃᓱᒪᒃᓴᕐᓯᐅᕈᑎᒃᓴᓪᓘᓐᓃᑦ, ᐃᓚᓕᐅᑎᓇᓱᖕᓂᐊᖅᐸᕗᑦ ᓄᓇᕗᑦ ᑐᓐᖓᕕᒃ ᑎᒥᖓᓄᑦ ᓂᕈᐊᕐᓇᓂᐊᖅᑐᖅ ᓇᓃᓕᖅᐱᑕ-ᒧᑦ. ᐊᖏᔪᖅᑳᑦᓴᒧᑦ ᓇᒡᒐᔾᔭᐅ, ᑏᓰᒻᕙ 10, 2012. What do you think about our magazine, Naniiliqpita? Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. will hold an election Do you have photographs, or ideas for stories or columns? for president on Monday, December 10, 2012. Send us your thoughts or ideas, and we’ll try to include them in Naniiliqpita. NTI-kut niguaqtitiniat angayuqakhamut X Qanuq ihumagiviuk makpigaliugaqqut, Naniiliqpita? talvani Hanangaut, Tisaipa 10, 2012. Piksautiqaqqiit unipkaliugakhanigluuniit? Tuyurlugit ihumagiyahi, ihumakhahi ilautinahuarniaqqaut Naiiliqpitamut. ᓂᕈᐊᕐᓂᐅᑉ ᓯᕗᓂᐊᒍᑦ ᓂᕈᐊᕐᓂᖃᓛᕐᑐᑦ ᑎᓯᐱᕆ 3. ᓄᓇᕗᑦ ᑐᙵᕕᒃᑯᑦ ᑐᓴᐅᒪᖃᑦᑕᐅᑎᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᖏᑦ ᐊᑐᕈᓐᓇᕆᕙᑦ ᓂᕈᐊᖅᑎᒃᓴᒥᒃ ᐊᓯᒥᓂᒃ ᓂᕈᐊᖅᑎᑦᑎᓂᕐᒧᑦ. ᑎᑎᖅᑲᖃᐅᑖ 638 ᐃᖃᓗᐃᑦ, ᓄᓇᕗᑦ X0A 0H0 NTI Communications Division ᑕᑯᓗᒍ ᑐᓄᐊᓃᑦᑐᖅ ᓇᓃᓕᖅᐱᑕ ᓂᕈᐊᕐᕕᐅᒐᔭᕐᑐᑦ ᐃᕝᕕᑦ P.O. Box 638 Iqaluit, NU X0A 0H0 ᖃᓂᒋᔭᖓᓃᑦᑐᖅ. Y (867) 975-4900 • (867) 975-4943 ᓂᕈᐊᕈᑎᒋᔭᖏᑦ ᓂᐱᖃᕈᑎᒋᓂᐊᖅᐸᑦ. 1-888-646-0006 ᐅᖃᐅᑎᓚᐅᒃᑭᑦ ᓄᓇᕗᑦ ᑐᓐᖓᕕᒃᑯᑦ ᑭᓇ [email protected] ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᖁᒻᒪᖔᖅᐱᐅᒃ ᓄᓇᑖᕆᔭᐅᓯᒪᓂᖓᓄᑦ www.tunngavik.com ᑲᑐᔾᔨᖃᑎᒌᒃᑐᖁᑎᓯᓐᓂᒃ. ᐅᖃᓕᒫᕋᔅᓴᓕᐅᖅᑐᑦ PUBLISHER TUTKIKHAEYI Advance Polls will be held December 3. ᓄᓇᕗᑦ ᑐᙵᕕᒃ ᑎᒥᖓᑦ Nunavut Tunngavik Nunavut Tunngavik You can also vote by proxy. Incorporated Timingat ᐋᖅᑭᒋᐊᕆᔨ See the back cover of Naniiliqpita for a polling station near you. EDITOR IHOAKHAEYI ᑭᐅᕆ ᒪᒃᓕᔅᑭ Kerry McCluskey Kerry McCluskey Your vote is your voice.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Chapter
    Chapter 13 The Muskrats of North America Other Than Ondatra zibethicus zibethicus THE FIFTEEN RECOGNIZED FORMS of muskrats having North American ranges outside of the range of 0. z. zibethicus show many differences as to population status, habitats, and geographical distribution. Of these other muskrats, 0. z. cinnamominus - the subspecies with which, next to zibethicus, I have had the most experience - can be notable for its low densities over tremendous areas of the arid and semiarid Great Plains; it may hardly be represented at all for stretches of hundreds of miles, yet seldom does it fail nominally to hold essentially its regular range, and it often reaches typical muskrat abundance m suitable marsh or stream habitats. "\\!estward from the range of cinnamominus extend the ranges of the evidently closely related mergens, occipitalis, and osoyoosensis. The one of these having the smallest range, occipitalis, &hows some behavior differences, whereas the widely distributed osoyoosensis is probably as versatile with respect to habitats and climate as any musk­ rat subspecies, including zibethicus. It is true that zibethicus in northern Ontario and osoyoosensis at high altitudes in western United States illustrate muskrat adaptability to long cold winters and marginal habitats as well as do any of what may be called the true northern muskrats - obscurus, aquilonius, a/bus, zalophus, and spatulatus. Nevertheless, much may still be learned from this latter group about what constitutes habitability of northern muskrat range and what muskrats can there endure in the way of edge-of-range phenomena. The subspecies macrodon, rivalicius, ripensis, bernardi, goldmani, and pallidus are all natives of warm climates and all have restricted geographic ranges.
    [Show full text]
  • Gjoa Haven © Nunavut Tourism
    NUNAVUT COASTAL RESOURCE INVENTORY ᐊᕙᑎᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ Department of Environment Avatiliqiyikkut Ministère de l’Environnement Gjoa Haven © Nunavut Tourism ᐊᕙᑎᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ Department of Environment Avatiliqiyikkut NUNAVUT COASTAL RESOURCE INVENTORY • Gjoa Haven INVENTORY RESOURCE COASTAL NUNAVUT Ministère de l’Environnement Nunavut Coastal Resource Inventory – Gjoa Haven 2011 Department of Environment Fisheries and Sealing Division Box 1000 Station 1310 Iqaluit, Nunavut, X0A 0H0 GJOA HAVEN Inventory deliverables include: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • A final report summarizing all of the activities This report is derived from the Hamlet of Gjoa Haven undertaken as part of this project; and represents one component of the Nunavut Coastal Resource Inventory (NCRI). “Coastal inventory”, as used • Provision of the coastal resource inventory in a GIS here, refers to the collection of information on coastal database; resources and activities gained from community interviews, research, reports, maps, and other resources. This data is • Large-format resource inventory maps for the Hamlet presented in a series of maps. of Gjoa Haven, Nunavut; and Coastal resource inventories have been conducted in • Key recommendations on both the use of this study as many jurisdictions throughout Canada, notably along the well as future initiatives. Atlantic and Pacific coasts. These inventories have been used as a means of gathering reliable information on During the course of this project, Gjoa Haven was visited on coastal resources to facilitate their strategic assessment, two occasions:
    [Show full text]
  • Coppermine River Nomination Document
    Coppermine River Nomination Document Government of Nunavut Parks and Tourism Division Department of Sustainable Development Coppermine River, Nunavut Nomination Document Parks and Tourism Division Department of Sustainable Development Community of Kugluktuk 1 2 Canadian Heritage Rivers System The Canadian Heritage Rivers System has been established by federal, provincial and territorial governments to recognize Canada’s outstanding rivers, and to ensure future management which will protect these rivers and enhance their significant heritage values for long-term benefit and enjoyment of Canadians. To qualify for inclusion in the Canadian Heritage Rivers System a river or a section of river must be of outstanding significance in one or more area; human heritage, natural heritage or recreational values. The nominated section should also be large enough to encompass these values and to provide the user with an appreciation of the river’s resources, as well as an enjoyable recreational experience. The responsibility for the collection and analysis of information to determine heritage values and for subsequent nomination of the river rests with the particular government within whose jurisdiction the nominated river lies. The Canadian Heritage Rivers Board, composed of federal, provincial and territorial repre- sentatives, will examine each nomination document and advise the Minister responsible for Parks Canada and the Minister(s) of the nominating agency (ies) on the suitability of the nominated river for inclusion within the Canadian Heritage Rivers System. When consider- ing a river, the Board will determine the degree to which the nominated river satisfies the “Guidelines for the selection of Canadian Heritage Rivers”. The Board will consider both the river and its surrounding landscape which together capture the heritage values.
    [Show full text]