Annual Report of the Human Rights Ombudsman of the Republic of Slovenia for 2018

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annual Report of the Human Rights Ombudsman of the Republic of Slovenia for 2018 2018 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS OMBUDSMAN OF THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA FOR 2018 2 The 24th Annual Report of the Human Rights Ombudsman of the Republic Of Slovenia for 2018 Ljubljana, February 2019 ABRIDGED VERSION OF THE REPORT 3 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION BY THE OMBUDSMAN AND PRESENTATION OF THE OMBUDSMAN’S WORK IN 2018 1.1 Assessment of the Observance of Human Rights and Legal Certainty in the Country 11 1.2 The Head Office of the Human Rights Ombudsman of the Republic of Slovenia 17 1.3 Legal Bases of the Ombudsman’s Work 18 1.4 The Ombudsman and her Deputies 20 1.5 Employees at the Ombudsman’s Office 22 1.6 The Ombudsman’s Office 24 1.7 Accessibility of the Human Rights Ombudsman in 2018 26 1.8 Meetings Outside the Head Office 27 1.9 Statistics for 2018 30 1.10 Establishment and Work of the Human Rights Ombudsman Council 33 1.11 Reports of the Human Rights Ombudsman 35 1.12 Meetings With Civil Society or Non-Governmental Organisations 37 1.13 The Omubdsman as the National Preventive Mechanism 38 1.14 Child Advocacy 41 1.15 Publications Issued in 2018 43 1.16 International Cooperation 44 1.17 Relations With the Media in 2018 51 1.18 Finance 57 1.19 Ombudsman’s Financial Independence and Autonomy 59 2. CONTENT OF WORK AND REVIEW OF CASES HANDLED 61 2.1 EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW AND PROHIBITION OF DISCRIMINATION 63 2.1.1 Disability Remains a Pressing Problem in Providing Equal Opportunities in Slovenian Society 63 2.1.2 On Physical Accessibility for Disabled Persons 64 2.1.3 Issues Regarding the Provision of Equal Opportunities in Relation to Sexual Identity or Orientation Remain Controversial 66 2.1.4 Discrimination Maintained Also on Grounds of Other Circumstances 77 2.2 PROTECTION OF DIGNITY, PERSONALITY RIGHTS, SAFETY AND PRIVACY 79 2.2.1 On the Protection of Personal Data and Other Privacy Aspects 79 2.2.2 Concisely on the Protection of Dignity and Personality Rights 81 2.3 FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE AND RELIGIOUS COMMUNITIES 83 2.3.1 The Legislator Still Does not Seem to be Serious About Prohibiting the Organisation of Religious Rituals in Public Nurseries and Schools 83 4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS OMBUDSMAN OF THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA FOR 2018 2.3.2 Allegations About the Ombudsman’s Insensitivity to the Rights of Members of Certain Religious Communities are Still Unfounded 84 2.3.3 Christianophobia? 85 2.4 FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION 87 2.4.1 Response Should be Primarily the Responsibility of the Environment in Which Hate Speech Occurs. 87 2.4.2 What can be Expressed During an Election Campaign? 88 2.4.3 Can a Fairy Tale Incite Inequality, Intolerance and Violence? 89 2.4.4 Depiction of Catholic Church Officials May Also be Disputable 90 2.4.5 Circumstances Regarding the Consideration of Reports of Violations of the Right to Rectification (or Response) by the Media Inspectorate are Alarming 91 2.4.6 Access to Public Information: How to Access Standards Which are Deemed Official Texts and Copyrighted Work at the Same Time? 91 2.5 ASSEMBLY, ASSOCIATION AND PARTICIPATION IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS 93 2.5.1 Urgent Amendments to Electoral Legislation Take Unacceptably Long 93 2.6 NATIONAL AND ETHNIC COMMUNITIES 95 2.6.1 Slovenians Abroad 95 2.6.2 Position and Rights of the Italian and Hungarian National Communities and Their Members 96 2.6.3 Position and Rights of the Roma Community and its Members 99 2.6.4 Other National and Ethnic Communities 105 2.7 FOREIGNERS 107 2.7.1 Unaccompanied Minors 113 2.8 RESTRICTION OF PERSONAL LIBERTY 115 2.8.1 General Findings 115 2.8.2 Realisation of the Ombudsman’s Recommendations Regarding Complaints of Remand Prisoners and Convicted Persons 117 2.8.3 Remand Prisoners 119 2.8.4 Prisoners 120 2.8.5 Unit For Forensic Psychiatry 128 2.8.6 Persons With Restricted Movement at Psychiatric Hospitals and Social Care Institutions 129 2.8.7 Minors in Residential Treatment Institutions and Special Education Institutes 132 2.8.8 Foreigners and Applicants for International Protection 133 2.9 PENSION AND DISABILITY INSURANCE 141 2.9.1 General Observations 141 2.9.2 Realisation of Recommendations 142 2.9.3 Pension Insurance 142 2.9.4 Disability Insurance 144 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS OMBUDSMAN OF THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA FOR 2018 5 2.10 HEALTH CARE 147 2.10.1 General Observations 147 2.10.2 Realisation of the Ombudsman’s Recommendations 148 2.10.3 Health Insurance 152 2.11 SOCIAL SECURITY 155 2.11.1 General Observations 155 2.11.2 Social Benefits and Assistance 157 2.11.3 Social Services 157 2.11.4 Institutional Care 159 2.12 LABOUR LAW MATTERS 163 2.12.1 General Findings 163 2.12.2 Realisation of the Ombudsman’s Recommendations 164 2.12.3 Lack of Staff at the Labour Inspectorate of the Republic of Slovenia (IRSD) 164 2.12.4 Cross-Border Provision of Services 165 2.12.5 Minimum Wage 165 2.12.6 Workers in the Public Sector 165 2.12.7 Disabled Workers 165 2.13 UNEMPLOYMENT 167 2.13.1 General Findings 167 2.13.2 Realisation of the Ombudsman’s Recommendations 168 2.13.3 Active Employment Policy 169 2.14 OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS 171 2.14.1 General Findings 171 2.14.2 Denationalisation 171 2.14.3 Property Law Matters 172 2.14.4 Taxes 173 2.14.5 Administrative Procedures 174 2.15 JUSTICE ADMINISTRATION 177 2.15.1 General Findings 177 2.15.2 Realisation of the Ombudsman’s Recommendations 179 2.15.3 Minor Offence Proceedings 184 2.15.4 Prosecution Service 186 2.15.5 Attorneys 188 2.15.6 Notaries 190 2.16 POLICE PROCEEDINGS 191 2.16.1 General Findings 191 2.16.2 Realisation of the Ombudsman’s Recommendations 193 2.16.3 Individual Findings From Complaints Considered 194 2.16.4 Private Security Service, Detectives and Traffic Wardens 199 6 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS OMBUDSMAN OF THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA FOR 2018 2.17 ENVIRONMENT AND SPATIAL PLANNING 201 2.17.1 General Findings 201 2.17.2 Realisation of the Ombudsman’s Recommendations 202 2.17.3 Cooperation With Non-Governmental Organisations 202 2.17.4 Adoption of Environmental Legislation 202 2.17.5 Inspection Procedures 203 2.17.6 Pollution of the Environment 203 2.17.7 Siting 204 2.18 REGULATED ACTIVITIES 207 2.18.1 General Findings 207 2.18.2 Realisation of the Ombudsman’s Recommendations 208 2.18.3 Municipal Utility Services 208 2.18.4 Transport 209 2.18.5 Chimney-Sweeping Services 209 2.19 Social Activities 211 2.19.1 Education 211 2.19.2 Sport 213 2.19.3 Culture 215 2.20 HOUSING MATTERS 217 2.20.1 General Findings 217 2.20.2 Realisation of the Ombudsman’s Recommendations 218 2.20.3 Analysis of Complaints Discussed 218 2.21 CHILDREN’S RIGHTS 221 2.21.1 General Observations 221 2.21.2 Family Relationships 222 2.21.3 Children In School 223 2.21.4 Children With Special Needs 227 2.21.5 Domestic Violence Against Children 231 2.22 CHILD ADVOCACY 235 2.22.1 Child Advocacy – Finally Entered Into Law After Ten Years of Efforts 235 2.23 OTHER 243 3. COMPILATION OF THE OMBUDSMAN’S RECOMMENDATIONS 245 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS OMBUDSMAN OF THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA FOR 2018 7 The terms used in this Report expressed by means of the masculine gender are deemed neutral for men and women 8 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS OMBUDSMAN OF THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA FOR 2018 1 INTRODUCTION BY THE OMBUDSMAN AND PRESENTATION OF THE OMBUDSMAN’S WORK IN 2018 BY THE OMBUDSMAN AND PRESENTATION OF THE OMBUDSMAN’S WORK IN 2018 WORK OF THE OMBUDSMAN’S AND PRESENTATION THE OMBUDSMAN BY 1 INTRODUCTION You must not lose faith in humanity Humanity is like an ocean; if a few drops of the ocean are dirty, the ocean does not become dirty If you change yourself, you will change your world With every true friendship we build more firmly the foundations on which the peace of the whole world rests Be the change that you want to see in the world Mahatma Gandhi ANNUAL REPORT OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS OMBUDSMAN OF THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA FOR 2018 9 INTRODUCTION BY THE OMBUDSMAN AND PRESENTATION OF THE OMBUDSMAN’S WORK IN 2018 WORK OF THE OMBUDSMAN’S AND PRESENTATION THE OMBUDSMAN INTRODUCTION BY 1 10 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS OMBUDSMAN OF THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA FOR 2018 1.1 ASSESSMENT OF THE OBSERVANCE OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND LEGAL CERTAINTY IN THE COUNTRY INTRODUCTION BY THE OMBUDSMAN AND PRESENTATION OF THE OMBUDSMAN’S WORK IN 2018 WORK OF THE OMBUDSMAN’S AND PRESENTATION THE OMBUDSMAN INTRODUCTION BY 1 Vlasta Nussdorfer, Human Rights Ombudsman Dear Reader, This is the last report that I hand over to the President of the National Assembly of the Republic of Slovenia, mag Dejan Židan, as a Human Rights Ombudsman The Human Rights Ombudsman Act stipulates that the Ombudsman submits to the National Assembly of the Republic of Slovenia (regular or special) reports about their work and findings regarding the level of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, as well as legal certainty of citizens in the Republic of Slovenia The report must be handed over no later than by 30 September of the year following the year that is being reported I am pleased that we succeeded in shortening the time of drafting annual reports during my term Until 2014, the report was handed over in June, and in the following years, it was delivered one month earlier, the last one in February It is important that the Ombudsman’s report arrives at the National Assembly of the Republic of Slovenia as soon as possible and is discussed promptly Otherwise, the Ombudsman’s findings, statements and recommendations lose their topicality, while certain eliminated violations and some others, which were determined anew, were unfortunately not included in the report The enforcement of human rights and freedoms cannot and must not be postponed, but we must react swiftly and effectively to all changes and particularly violations.
Recommended publications
  • The Importance of Buffer Zones: Working with Public Authorities And
    LANDSCAPE PARK STRUNJAN THE IMPORTANCE OF BUFFER ZONES Working with Public Authorities and Privates By: Robert Smrekar, director The development of a common strategy to foster the sustainable tourism involving public authorities and privates, and how a buffer zone serve as a tool to mitigate the impact of tourism Main topic: The Lanscape Park Strunjan Joint Decree of the Municipality of Piran and Izola in 1990. 428 Hectares 2 Nature Reserves, 1 Natural Monument, 13 Natural Values. Established by Two Local Municipalities PARK LOCATION Northern Adriatic, Gulf of Trieste, Slovenian Coast. PARK MANAGEMENT Public Institute Landscape Park Strunjan, est. 2009 700 YEARS OF TRADITION Saltpans The Smallest and the Northernmost Saltpans in the Mediterranean Basin The Only Slovenian Marine Lagoon - Stjuža THE HIGHEST FLYSCH CLIFF ON THE EAST ADRIATIC COAST METERS HIGH THE SEA "The Largest Marine Protected Area in the Slovenian Sea" THE LANDSCAPE One of the Most Conserved Cultural Landscape on Slovenian Coast. Pressure: 400.000 Visitors per year And Rising Overtourism. On Land And on the Sea Seeking the Balance Between Nature Protection, Businesses and Local Inhabitants The Engagement of Local Authorities Detailed Analysis Contact With Decision-makers Clear Vison Provide Solutions, Not Problems Two Buffer Zones: Belvedere Terraces (Municipality of Izola) and Strunjan (Municipality of Piran) Buffer Zones ENTRY POINTS Activities: (To be Included in Spatial Regulatory Acts) Stationary Traffic Alternatives to Car Visitors Awareness Buffer Zones Regulation
    [Show full text]
  • 5Th Danube 2015 Eregion Conference
    DeRC 5th Danube 2015 eRegion Conference Cross-border eSolutions & eServices Prototypes Development DeRC 2015 Conference 5th Danube eRegion Conference – DeRC 2015: Cross-border eSolutions & eServices Prototypes Development Ljubljana, Monday-Tuesday, September 21-22, 2015 Location: Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Slovenia, Dimičeva ulica 13, 1000 Ljubljana DeRC 2015 Co-organizers Inter-Municipality Initiative: Cross-border eCollaboration in the Danube eRegion Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Regional Chamber Ljubljana Directorate for Economic Diplomacy, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Slovenia Office for Slovenians Abroad, Republic of Slovenia Host: SAP Videoconference & media partner: Grain of Heath team Tuesday, September 22: Overview Section A (Room A) 09:00 – 10:30 eCommunication as a Tool for Strengthening the Multi-ethnicity and Competitiveness of the Danube Region 11:00 – 12:30 Joint eMunicipalities Without Borders Development 14:00 – 15:30 Chambers of Commerce and Industry for the EU Digital Single Market Development 16:00 – 17:30 Possible Universities’ Contributions to the Digital Single Market Development Section B (Room C) 09:00 : 10:30 Executive Women Expanding Cross-border eBusiness 14:00 – 15:30 EU Based Projects for Public Sector 16:00 – 17:30 Innovation and Business Acceleration Across Borders Section C (Room Oaza, 7th Floor) 11:00 – 12:30 eOpening Up Education & Healthy Workplaces 14:00 – 15:30 Museums eCollaborating on the New eSilk and New eAmber Roads 16:00 – 17:30 Prototype Presentations 2 5th Danube eRegion Conference – DeRC 2015 Monday, September 21, 9:00 – 13:00 Preconference Meeting Regional SAP University Alliance Meeting with Extended Invitation to Rectors & Deans in the Danube Region Room A 9:00 -10:30 Presentations Chair: Adam Dudits, Director University Engagements Baltics, CEE, CIS, Nordics SAP Germany [email protected] Presenters: SAP University Alliance Program – Directions for 2016 Adam Dudits, Director University Engagements Baltics, CEE, CIS, Nordics SAP Germany Experience of Polytechnic Zagreb Mag.
    [Show full text]
  • Development Report 2017 Development 2010 Report
    development report 2010 development development report 2010 development report 2017 development report 2010 development development report 2010 Development Report 2017 ISSN 1581-6907 (print) ISSN 2464-0506 (pdf) Ljubljana, June 2017 Published by: IMAD, Ljubljana, Gregorčičeva 27 Responsible Person: Boštjan Vasle, MSc, Director Editor: Rotija Kmet Zupančič, MSc Assistant Editor: Matevž Hribernik, MSc Authors of the Development Report 2017: Marijana Bednaš, MSc, Jure Brložnik, Tanja Čelebič, MSc, Aleš Delakorda, MSc, Janez Dodič, Lejla Fajić, Barbara Bratuž Ferk, MSc, Marko Glažar, PhD, Marjan Hafner, MSc, Matevž Hribernik, MSc, Slavica Jurančič, Alenka Kajzer, PhD, Rotija Kmet Zupančič, MSc, Mojca Koprivnikar Šušteršič, Mateja Kovač, MSc, Valerija Korošec, PhD, Janez Kušar, MSc, Urška Lušina, Jože Markič, PhD, Helena Mervic, Ana Murn, PhD, Tina Nenadič, MSc, Janja Pečar, Mitja Perko, Jure Povšnar, Matija Rojec, PhD, Urška Sodja, Metka Stare, PhD, Dragica Šuc, MSc, Branka Tavčar, Ana Tršelič Selan, MSc, Ana Vidrih, MSc, Eva Zver, MSc. Editorial board: Marijana Bednaš, MSc, Jure Brložnik, Aleš Delakorda, MSc, Lejla Fajić, Matevž Hribernik, MSc, Alenka Kajzer, PhD, Mateja Kovač, MSc, Janez Kušar, MSc, Metka Stare, PhD, Boštjan Vasle, MSc. Translation: Translation and Interpretation Division of the Secretariat-General of the Government of the RS, Marija Kavčič Language Editing: Amidas d.o.o. DTP: Ema Bertina Kopitar, Bibijana Cirman Naglič Figures: Bibijana Cirman Naglič Print: Eurograf d.o.o. Circulation: 95 copies © The contents of this
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Report »Local Food As an Engine for Local Business Development Centre of the Heart of Slovenia, October 2013
    MAPPING REPORT »Local Food as an Engine for Local Business« Development Centre of the Heart of Slovenia Ltd LOCFOOD project team: Monika Cvetkov Gašper Kleč Aleksandra Gradišek, director October, 2013 Mapping Report »Local Food as an Engine for Local Business Development Centre of the Heart of Slovenia, October 2013 Table of content Summary ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 2 2 Overview of mapping exercise ......................................................................................................... 2 2.1 The key stakeholders in relation to LOCFOOD goals and their role ....................................... 2 2.2 The main policies for each stakeholder .................................................................................... 2 3 Key stakeholders views (quotes) ..................................................................................................... 3 3.1 Meetings/events of stakeholders ............................................................................................... 3 3.2 Quotes of stakeholders (from the survey) ................................................................................. 5 4 Key secondary sources ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Covid-19 and Social Work: a Collection of Country Reports
    COVID-19 AND SOCIAL WORK: A COLLECTION OF COUNTRY REPORTS Edited by Lena Dominelli, Timo Harrikari, Joseph Mooney, Vesna Leskošek and Erin Kennedy Tsunoda Contributors are members of the COVID-19 Social Work Research Forum July 2020 ii Disclaimer This compilation of Country Reports of the COVID-19 pandemic provides a snapshot of the situation in particular countries at a moment in time. It has not been peer reviewed, although it was edited several times to clarify the usage of the English language which is not the first language of a number of the authors, and to ensure uniformity of style and referencing. The authors of each Country Report are wholly responsible for the content and accuracy of the data and views expressed therein. Thus, neither IASSW nor the editors, individually or collectively are accountable for their work. The editors and IASSW are simply facilitating access to people’s country narratives. Sharing Information This document should be easy to use and provide comparable information which we trust will be useful for research purposes in social work around the world. The contributors to this first edition of the collection are members of the COVID-19 Social Work Research Forum. However, not all members of the Forum have contributed to it in the short timeframe we had available. We would urge those who would like to contribute their country report to contact Lena Dominelli at [email protected] and she will facilitate access to the contributions already on the IASSW website. Future intention There is an intention to turn this collection into a book at some point in the near future, but we felt it was important to record the positions of various countries now, briefly and quickly.
    [Show full text]
  • “International Handbook on Green Local Fiscal Policy Models”
    “International handbook on green local fiscal policy models” LOCAL Policies for GREEN Energy – LOCAL4GREEN 1 Meritxell Bennasar Casasa Contents 1. Introduction 1.1. Background. Description Local Policies for Green Energy Project 1.2. About this document: main objectives and characteristics of this manual 1.3. Target Groups: Local authorities Consultants specializing in public management Decision makers of national and regional authorities Other interested parties in the promotion of renewable energy sources 1.4. Partners 2. Description of the 9 Mediterranean countries 2.1. Albania Lezha Vau i Dejës Kukës 2.2. Croatia Brdovec Jastrebarsko Klanjec Dugo Selo Pregrada 2.3. Cyprus Lakatamia Nicosia Aradippou 2.4. Greece Amariou Edessa Farsala Kozani Lagadas Leros Malevizi Milos Pilea-Hortiatis Platania Sithonia Tanagra Thermi Volvi 2.5. Italy 2 2.6. Malta San Lawrenz Sannat Kercem 2.7. Portugal Albufeira Alcoutim Aljezur Castro Marim Faro Lagoa Lagos Loulé Monchique Olhão Portimão São Brás de Alportel Silves Tavira Vila do Bispo Vila Real de Santo António 2.8. Slovenia Grosuplje Ivančna Gorica Kamnik Kočevje Kranj Križevci Lenart Trebnje 2.9. Spain Dolores Muro d’Alcoi Pedreguer Alfàs del Pi Altea Callosa d’en Sarrià Almussafes Godella Quart de Poblet Alaquàs Xeresa 3. Comparative study of national regulations 3.1. Albania 3.1.1. Albanian Tax System 3.1.2. Description of Fiscal Policies of Pilot Municipalities 3.2. Croatia 3.2.1. Croatian Tax Sytem 3.2.2. Description of Fiscal Policies of Pilot Municipalities 3.3. Cyprus 3.3.1. Cypriot Tax Sytem 3 3.3.2. Description of Fiscal Policies of Pilot Municipalities 3.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutions Contact Person Priority 1, Strategic Theme 1: Innovation As
    Institutions Contact person e-mail Priority 1, Strategic theme 1: Innovation as key for economic development Municipality of Koper, Verdijeve 10, 6000 Koper, Slovenia Ivana Štrkalj [email protected] Municipality of Izola, Sončno nabrežje 8, 6310 Izola, Slovenia Boštjan Lavrič [email protected] Regional development agency of Northern Primorska, Trg Edvarda Kardelja 3, 5000 Nova Gorica, Slovenia Tomaž Vadjunec [email protected] Chamber of Craft and Small Business of Slovenia, Celovška 71, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia Bogdan Sovinc [email protected] Primorska Technology Park, mednarodni prehod 6, vrtojba, 5290 Šempeter pri Novi Gorici Tanja Kožuh [email protected] Tehniški šolski center Nova Gorica, Cankarjeva 10, 5000 Nova Gorica, Slovenia Rosana Pahor [email protected] GEA College, Kidričevo nabrežje 2, 6330 Piran Majda Gartner [email protected] Centre of Excellence BIPC (www.cobik.si) Mladen Dakič [email protected] Priority 2, Strategic theme 1: Improving marine, coastal and delta rivers environment by joint management Institute for Water of the Republic of Slovenia, Hajdrihova 28 c, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia Leon Gosar [email protected] Jožef Stefan Institute, Jamova cesta 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia Sonja Lojen [email protected] Municipality of Izola, Sončno nabrežje 8, 6310 Izola, Slovenia Boštjan Lavrič [email protected] Slovenian national building and civil engineering institute, Dimičeva 12, 1000 Ljubljana Karmen Fifer [email protected] Municipality of Koper, Verdijeve 10, 6000 Koper, Slovenia Ivana Štrkalj [email protected] Priority 2, Strategic theme 2: Protection from ballast water pollution A single potential partnership with Slovenian institutions is in a process of establishment where the Institute for Water of the Republic of Slovenia will assume a role of a Lead Beneficiary.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Demographic Characteristics and Processes in Ljubljana Dejan Rebernik
    GeograFF 8 7. Demographic characteristics and processes in Ljubljana Dejan Rebernik The city of Ljubljana and its urban region experienced very dynamic population growth after 1945. Up until the 1970s, population growth was mainly a consequence of intensive migration from rural and less developed areas of Slovenia and the rest of Yugoslavia. Im- migrants provided the labor force needed for the rapidly growing manufacturing and services sectors. Characteristic was concentration of population in Ljubljana as well as in other, smaller towns in the region. At the same time a positive natural increase is also characteristic of this period, which together with a positive migration increase contrib- utes to the growth in population. In the 1980s and 1990s the relocation of the population to suburban settlements at the edge of the city intensified. In this way the largest subur- banized area in Slovenia, with around 150.000 inhabitants, took form. The city centre and older areas of housing experienced depopulation. The natural increase declined due to a drop in fertility and in 1996 Ljubljana recorded a negative natural increase for the first time. After 1991 the Ljubljana urban region experienced rapid economic development, which attracted new migration flows. The region has the highest migration balance of all the Slovenian regions. In the same period, due to negative natural and migration growth, the number of inhabitants in Ljubljana itself decreased. The main objective of this chapter is to present the major characteristics of population development in Ljubljana and the Ljubljana urban region. Population development is placed and explained in the context of general demographic and urbanization processes in Slovenia.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transport in the Ljubljana Urban Region 1 Contents
    Public transport in the Ljubljana Urban Region 1 Contents Address of Zoran Janković, President of the Council of the Ljubljana Urban Region and Mayor of Ljubljana 9Mayors of the Ljubljana Urban Region on public transport Lilijana Madjar: Yes, it is time for sustainable mobility in the Ljubljana Urban Region 15 Interview with Stephen Atkins by Jurij Kobal – Public transport is a key component 21 in the self-esteem of every European capital Views of the members of the select project group on public transport 25 Omega consult d. o. o.: ‘Expert guidelines for the regulation of regional public transport’ (a summary) 41117 Priority projects of the Ljubljana Urban Region 2 Zoran Janković Address of the president of the Council of the Ljubljana Urban Region and Mayor of the Municipality of Ljubljana Transport significantly contributes to contemporary development, as it overcomes distances and connects people. Apart from its indispensable role in everyday life, its long-term impact on society and the environment increasingly calls for attention. Functional, quality and professional transport management determines the development path both of the region and the State. Hence the project ‘Expert guidelines for the regulation of regional public transport’ is an excellent foundation for the regulation and establishment of quality public passenger transport on the principles of sustainable mobility by 2027. At the Municipality of Ljubljana we have set out a long-term programme for public transport and designed activities needed for its implementation. What are the most important projects through which we wish to achieve greater efficiency and safety in public transport, and the use of alternative fuels, as well as encourage cycling and walking? · By closing the city centre to traffic, newly re-designed public spaces such as Prešeren Square (Prešernov trg) and the Three Bridges (Tromostovje), Ciril-Metod Square (Ciril Metodov trg), Breg, Krakovo Embankment (Krakovski nasip), Špica and Trnovo Quay (Trnovski pristan) are intended for pedestrians and cyclists.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the RSG, Their Role and Potential
    Report on the RSG, their role and potential Deliverable D.T1.1.2 WPT-1 Gianluca Lentini, Francesca Polettini Poliedra – Politecnico di Milano 1. The Regional Stakeholder Groups in a 4-H logic One of the WPT-1 main outputs is the definition of the Regional Stakeholder Groups (RSG), the role of which is to accompany the smart transition in the Test Areas. The definition of the RSG is necessary in order to assist the assessment of the level of smartness of each Test Area, give input for best practices and test the digital exchange platform (DEP), codesign the toolbox and facilitate the transfer of project results to the policy level. The selection of the stakeholders depends on the issue in which each Test Area is set to be working, thus the aims of each Test Areas need to be clearly defined. The RSG mapping works in a quadruple-helix (4H) logic, a conceptual framework that sees innovation at the intersection of the converging interests of: public entities/policy makers, academia/research institutions, business/firms/enterprises/economic actors, civil society/NGOs/citizen organizations. The mapping represents the starting point of the activities in the Test Areas, and aims at kickstarting the evaluation of the state of the art for Smart Transition, the first activity of the RSG. The number of stakeholders to be involved is critically linked to the dimensions and demographics of the Test Area. Ideally, all elements of the quadruple helix should be covered, but the societal, demographical and economical structure of the Test Area influence the distribution of RSG.
    [Show full text]
  • D Ve Domo Vini • T W O Homelands 25 • 200 7 25 • 2007
    DVE DOMOVINI ● TWO HOMELANDS Razprave o izseljenstvu ● Migration Studies 25 ● 2007 dve domovinidomovini Razprave in članki / Essays and Articles Pojasnilo k tematskemu sklopu Žumberčani – nekdanji in sedanji graničarji (Duška Knežević Hočevar) Problem »pripadnosti« Žumberčanov in Marindolcev v desetletjih pred two HomelandsHomelands razpustom Vojne krajine 1881 in po njem (Marko Zajc) Žumberk: meja, etničnost, veroizpoved, rodnost in migracije prebivalstva 25 • 2007 – demogeografska analiza (Damir Josipovič) Nekatere demografske značilnosti grkokatoliških Žumberčanov v Sloveniji (Peter Repolusk) Povratak na granicu: migracijska iskustva u trokutu Hrvatska-Njemačka- Slovenija (Jasna Čapo Žmegač) Ali se Žumberčani večinoma poročajo med seboj? Primer župnije v Radatovićih (Duška Knežević Hočevar) Poročne strategije župljanov Velikih Brusnic izpod Gorjancev pri Novem mestu (Irena Rožman) Krekova Vestfalska pisma: socialno-ekonomski pogledi in izseljenstvo (Marjan Drnovšek) Normativni vidiki in delovne razmere za migrante v Zvezni republiki Nemčiji (Marina Lukšič - Hacin) Izseljenska književnost in časopisje: zgovorne statistike (Janja Žitnik) Marie Prisland – her role in preserving Slovenian culture and tradition among Slovenian migrants in the United States (Mirjam Milharčič Hladnik) Ethnic, regional and national identities in the context of European cross border cooperation opportunities: a case study of Italian ethnic community in Slovene Istria (Ksenija Šabec) Način življenja hrvatskog iseljeničkog korpusa u Australiji: iskustva, mišljenja
    [Show full text]
  • Mediterranean Action Plan
    MAP Mediterranean Action Plan MAP Coastal Area Management Programme (CAMP) Slovenia: Final Integrated Report MAP Technical Reports Series No. 171 Note: The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP/MAP concerning the legal status of any State, Territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of their frontiers or boundaries. Note: Les appellations employées dans ce document et la présentation des données qui y figurent n'impliquent de la part du PNUE/PAM aucune prise de position quant au statut juridique des pays, territoires, villes ou zones, ou de leurs autorités, ni quant au tracé de leurs frontières ou limites. This report was prepared under the co-ordination of the UNEP/MAP Priority Actions Programme, Regional Activity Centre (PAP/RAC). This series contains selected reports resulting from the various activities performed within the framework of the components of the Mediterranean Action Plan: Blue Plan (BP), Priority Actions Programme (PAP), Specially Protected Areas (SPA) and Regional Marine Pollution Emergency Response Centre for the Mediterranean Sea (REMPEC). Ce rapport a été préparé sous la coordination du Centre d'Activités Régionales pour le Programme d'Actions Prioritaires (CAR/PAP) du PNUE/PAM. Cette série rassemble des rapports sélectionnés établis dans le cadre de la mise en œuvre des diverses composantes du Plan d'Action pour la Méditerranée: Plan Bleu (PB), Programme d'Actions Prioritaires (PAP), Aires Spécialement Protégées (ASP) et Centre régional méditerranéen pour l'intervention d'urgence contre la pollution marine accidentelle (REMPEC).
    [Show full text]