7. Demographic Characteristics and Processes in Ljubljana Dejan Rebernik

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

7. Demographic Characteristics and Processes in Ljubljana Dejan Rebernik GeograFF 8 7. Demographic characteristics and processes in Ljubljana Dejan Rebernik The city of Ljubljana and its urban region experienced very dynamic population growth after 1945. Up until the 1970s, population growth was mainly a consequence of intensive migration from rural and less developed areas of Slovenia and the rest of Yugoslavia. Im- migrants provided the labor force needed for the rapidly growing manufacturing and services sectors. Characteristic was concentration of population in Ljubljana as well as in other, smaller towns in the region. At the same time a positive natural increase is also characteristic of this period, which together with a positive migration increase contrib- utes to the growth in population. In the 1980s and 1990s the relocation of the population to suburban settlements at the edge of the city intensified. In this way the largest subur- banized area in Slovenia, with around 150.000 inhabitants, took form. The city centre and older areas of housing experienced depopulation. The natural increase declined due to a drop in fertility and in 1996 Ljubljana recorded a negative natural increase for the first time. After 1991 the Ljubljana urban region experienced rapid economic development, which attracted new migration flows. The region has the highest migration balance of all the Slovenian regions. In the same period, due to negative natural and migration growth, the number of inhabitants in Ljubljana itself decreased. The main objective of this chapter is to present the major characteristics of population development in Ljubljana and the Ljubljana urban region. Population development is placed and explained in the context of general demographic and urbanization processes in Slovenia. We attempted to determine to what extent the growth in population is a consequence of migration trends or natural increase. Special attention is given to par- ticular parts of the city of Ljubljana and the urban region and to the latest urbanization and demographic processes. In the second part of the chapter we give greater attention to an overview of the demographic characteristics of Ljubljana, with an emphasis on the age structure of the population. Population development and demographic characteris- tics have a great influence on the spatial development of the city and urban region; we therefore highlight the problem of spatial planning in a situation in which the population is both declining and aging. 7.1. Population development and demographic char- acteristics of Ljubljana and the Ljubljana urban region before 1991 The current size, spatial distribution and demographic characteristics of the population in Ljubljana and the Ljubljana urban region are primarily the result of migration flows which occurred in Slovenia and in the former Yugoslavia after 1945. Although a relatively low degree of urbanization is still typical for Slovenia, with only slightly more than 50 % 85 Challenges of spatial development of Ljubljana and Belgrade of the population living in urban areas, during the first postwar period up to the end of the 1970s, the country was characterized by accelerated urbanization, which was fu- eled mainly by strong migration of the population from the countryside (Ravbar, 1994). The population immigrated from Slovenian rural areas and a large part, about one third, came from migrants from regions in the former Yugoslavia. Besides Ljubljana some larger urban settlements within the urban region also grew quickly, in particular Domžale, Vrh- nika, Litija and Grosuplje. The population of the present-day territory of the Urban Municipality of Ljubljana in- creased from approximately 120.000 to approximately 270.000 from 1948 to 1991, or by about 120 % (Figure 23). The rate of population growth after 1945 increased steadily and achieved a peak between 1961 and 1981. After 1981 population growth slowed considerably, and at the end of the 1980s it began to stagnate. The causes for this kind of population development can be found in demographic, urbanization, and socio- economic processes which took place in Slovenia during the period studied (Rebernik, 1999). Compared to other European countries, Slovenia is characterized by a relatively low level of urbanization, with just a bit over 50 % of the population living in urban areas. Nevertheless, rapid urbanization characterized the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s: the share of the urban population increased from 26 % in 1948 to 36 % in 1961, 45 % in 1971 and 49 % in 1981. Urbanization was mainly a consequence of the abandonment of farming, indus- trialization, and the migration of population into cities from rural areas of Slovenia and the rest of Yugoslavia. The population grew most rapidly in major regional centres and highly industrial cities. In the 1970s the fastest growth was shown by towns in the urban- ized environs of Ljubljana, Maribor, and Celje. Here it should be stressed that urbanization in Slovenia was less pronounced than in other Yugoslav republics. The relatively weak urbanization in Slovenia was a result mainly of commuting by the labor force from rural settlements to urban centres of employment and the initiation of a policy of polycentric economic and urban development. Polycentrism in Slovenia became the basic concept of spatial development in the 1970s and 1980s. The development of industry and ser- vices in smaller urban and rural settlements and in less developed parts of Slovenia was actively encouraged. Access to jobs in the countryside slowed the rural-urban migra- tion. In comparison with other major cities in the republics of the former Yugoslavia, the growth of Ljubljana was considerably slower. In 1948 about 8 % of the population lived in Ljubljana, and in 2007 about 13 %, which is a considerably smaller share than in the cases of Belgrade, Zagreb, Sarajevo and Skopje. 86 GeograFF 8 Figure 23: Population development in the territory of the Urban Municipality of Ljubljana between 1945 and 200921. 300000 250000 200000 150000 100000 50000 0 l. 1948 l. 1953 l. 1961 l. 1971 l. 1981 l. 1991 l. 2002 l. 2008 Population number Source: Statistical office of the Republic of Slovenia. After 1981 a slower growth of the urban population can be observed. While the popula- tion in the majority of cities continued to grow, in the 1980s for the first time there was a drop in population in some cities. Large cities in the more urbanized regions lost popula- tion, while towns in less urbanized parts of the country continued to grow. It is thus clear that classical urbanization, i.e. the process of concentration of the population in cities, changed to the suburbanization of the more densely populated areas in the wider vicin- ity of larger towns and cities (Ravbar, 1994). In the 1980s, the highest rate of growth of the population occurred in settlements on the outskirts of major regional centres, due to the outmigration of the urban population. In the 1990s the processes mentioned further intensified. The total number of inhabitants in cities declined, most noticeably in major centres. The share of the population living in urban settlements thus declined by 1 % between 1996 and 2002. At the same time there was a continuation and intensification in the deconcentration of the population into surrounding suburbanized areas. In the first half of the 1990s population growth was most rapid in suburbanized settlements at the city’s edge, but between 1996 and 2002 small rural settlements with good access to major urban centres had the most rapid growth. Thus in the most recent period there has been an urbanization process in the broader hinterland of urban regions. 21 Data are recalculated according to the methodology of the 2002 Census for the territory of the present-day Urban Munici- pality of Ljubljana. 87 Challenges of spatial development of Ljubljana and Belgrade Tables 11 and 12 show the total, natural, and migration growth of the population for particular years, which enables a more detailed analysis of population development in Ljubljana. Data for the period between 1945 and 1964 were accessible for the area of the city of Ljubljana as defined by the Statistical Agency at that time—the settlement of Lju- bljana and selected settlements along its edge (Mauser, 1970). For the period between 1965 and 1993 data were collected for five Ljubljana municipalities (Center, Bežigrad, Moste, Šiška and Vič-Rudnik), which now comprise the Administrative Unit of Ljubljana and thus include a considerably wider area. For this reason data from the two periods are not directly comparable, but they nevertheless make possible the identification of basic trends in the demographic development of Ljubljana. The spatial extent of Ljublja- na municipalities is not the most suitable for our analysis, since it also includes entirely rural settlements in the municipality of Vič-Rudnik and also partially in the municipality of Moste, while it does not include the urbanized settlements in the municipalities of Domžale, Vrhnika and Grosuplje, which are closely connected to Ljubljana. Despite some deficiencies, the data cited are nonetheless a sufficiently good indicator of basic trends in population development in the territory of Ljubljana and its urban region. A more detailed view of population development shows that the annual growth of the population fluctuated greatly. The annual growth in the territory of the city of Ljubljana between 1945 and 1964 ranged between 2000 and 6000 inhabitants, with an average of 3500 to 4000. The rate of population growth reached a value of between 2-3 %, greatly surpassing the value for the whole of Slovenia as well as the values for urban settlements. Between 1965 and 1980 the annual growth in the territory of the five Ljubljana munici- palities at the time was between 5000 and 7000 inhabitants, or 2-2.5 %. After 1980 there was a sharp drop, and in 1991 and 1992 it was even negative (Rebernik, 1999). Population growth in cities is the result of the natural increase of the urban population and immigration into the city.
Recommended publications
  • Development Report 2017 Development 2010 Report
    development report 2010 development development report 2010 development report 2017 development report 2010 development development report 2010 Development Report 2017 ISSN 1581-6907 (print) ISSN 2464-0506 (pdf) Ljubljana, June 2017 Published by: IMAD, Ljubljana, Gregorčičeva 27 Responsible Person: Boštjan Vasle, MSc, Director Editor: Rotija Kmet Zupančič, MSc Assistant Editor: Matevž Hribernik, MSc Authors of the Development Report 2017: Marijana Bednaš, MSc, Jure Brložnik, Tanja Čelebič, MSc, Aleš Delakorda, MSc, Janez Dodič, Lejla Fajić, Barbara Bratuž Ferk, MSc, Marko Glažar, PhD, Marjan Hafner, MSc, Matevž Hribernik, MSc, Slavica Jurančič, Alenka Kajzer, PhD, Rotija Kmet Zupančič, MSc, Mojca Koprivnikar Šušteršič, Mateja Kovač, MSc, Valerija Korošec, PhD, Janez Kušar, MSc, Urška Lušina, Jože Markič, PhD, Helena Mervic, Ana Murn, PhD, Tina Nenadič, MSc, Janja Pečar, Mitja Perko, Jure Povšnar, Matija Rojec, PhD, Urška Sodja, Metka Stare, PhD, Dragica Šuc, MSc, Branka Tavčar, Ana Tršelič Selan, MSc, Ana Vidrih, MSc, Eva Zver, MSc. Editorial board: Marijana Bednaš, MSc, Jure Brložnik, Aleš Delakorda, MSc, Lejla Fajić, Matevž Hribernik, MSc, Alenka Kajzer, PhD, Mateja Kovač, MSc, Janez Kušar, MSc, Metka Stare, PhD, Boštjan Vasle, MSc. Translation: Translation and Interpretation Division of the Secretariat-General of the Government of the RS, Marija Kavčič Language Editing: Amidas d.o.o. DTP: Ema Bertina Kopitar, Bibijana Cirman Naglič Figures: Bibijana Cirman Naglič Print: Eurograf d.o.o. Circulation: 95 copies © The contents of this
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Report »Local Food As an Engine for Local Business Development Centre of the Heart of Slovenia, October 2013
    MAPPING REPORT »Local Food as an Engine for Local Business« Development Centre of the Heart of Slovenia Ltd LOCFOOD project team: Monika Cvetkov Gašper Kleč Aleksandra Gradišek, director October, 2013 Mapping Report »Local Food as an Engine for Local Business Development Centre of the Heart of Slovenia, October 2013 Table of content Summary ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 2 2 Overview of mapping exercise ......................................................................................................... 2 2.1 The key stakeholders in relation to LOCFOOD goals and their role ....................................... 2 2.2 The main policies for each stakeholder .................................................................................... 2 3 Key stakeholders views (quotes) ..................................................................................................... 3 3.1 Meetings/events of stakeholders ............................................................................................... 3 3.2 Quotes of stakeholders (from the survey) ................................................................................. 5 4 Key secondary sources ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • “International Handbook on Green Local Fiscal Policy Models”
    “International handbook on green local fiscal policy models” LOCAL Policies for GREEN Energy – LOCAL4GREEN 1 Meritxell Bennasar Casasa Contents 1. Introduction 1.1. Background. Description Local Policies for Green Energy Project 1.2. About this document: main objectives and characteristics of this manual 1.3. Target Groups: Local authorities Consultants specializing in public management Decision makers of national and regional authorities Other interested parties in the promotion of renewable energy sources 1.4. Partners 2. Description of the 9 Mediterranean countries 2.1. Albania Lezha Vau i Dejës Kukës 2.2. Croatia Brdovec Jastrebarsko Klanjec Dugo Selo Pregrada 2.3. Cyprus Lakatamia Nicosia Aradippou 2.4. Greece Amariou Edessa Farsala Kozani Lagadas Leros Malevizi Milos Pilea-Hortiatis Platania Sithonia Tanagra Thermi Volvi 2.5. Italy 2 2.6. Malta San Lawrenz Sannat Kercem 2.7. Portugal Albufeira Alcoutim Aljezur Castro Marim Faro Lagoa Lagos Loulé Monchique Olhão Portimão São Brás de Alportel Silves Tavira Vila do Bispo Vila Real de Santo António 2.8. Slovenia Grosuplje Ivančna Gorica Kamnik Kočevje Kranj Križevci Lenart Trebnje 2.9. Spain Dolores Muro d’Alcoi Pedreguer Alfàs del Pi Altea Callosa d’en Sarrià Almussafes Godella Quart de Poblet Alaquàs Xeresa 3. Comparative study of national regulations 3.1. Albania 3.1.1. Albanian Tax System 3.1.2. Description of Fiscal Policies of Pilot Municipalities 3.2. Croatia 3.2.1. Croatian Tax Sytem 3.2.2. Description of Fiscal Policies of Pilot Municipalities 3.3. Cyprus 3.3.1. Cypriot Tax Sytem 3 3.3.2. Description of Fiscal Policies of Pilot Municipalities 3.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transport in the Ljubljana Urban Region 1 Contents
    Public transport in the Ljubljana Urban Region 1 Contents Address of Zoran Janković, President of the Council of the Ljubljana Urban Region and Mayor of Ljubljana 9Mayors of the Ljubljana Urban Region on public transport Lilijana Madjar: Yes, it is time for sustainable mobility in the Ljubljana Urban Region 15 Interview with Stephen Atkins by Jurij Kobal – Public transport is a key component 21 in the self-esteem of every European capital Views of the members of the select project group on public transport 25 Omega consult d. o. o.: ‘Expert guidelines for the regulation of regional public transport’ (a summary) 41117 Priority projects of the Ljubljana Urban Region 2 Zoran Janković Address of the president of the Council of the Ljubljana Urban Region and Mayor of the Municipality of Ljubljana Transport significantly contributes to contemporary development, as it overcomes distances and connects people. Apart from its indispensable role in everyday life, its long-term impact on society and the environment increasingly calls for attention. Functional, quality and professional transport management determines the development path both of the region and the State. Hence the project ‘Expert guidelines for the regulation of regional public transport’ is an excellent foundation for the regulation and establishment of quality public passenger transport on the principles of sustainable mobility by 2027. At the Municipality of Ljubljana we have set out a long-term programme for public transport and designed activities needed for its implementation. What are the most important projects through which we wish to achieve greater efficiency and safety in public transport, and the use of alternative fuels, as well as encourage cycling and walking? · By closing the city centre to traffic, newly re-designed public spaces such as Prešeren Square (Prešernov trg) and the Three Bridges (Tromostovje), Ciril-Metod Square (Ciril Metodov trg), Breg, Krakovo Embankment (Krakovski nasip), Špica and Trnovo Quay (Trnovski pristan) are intended for pedestrians and cyclists.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sixth Annual Report Abbreviated Version
    REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA HUMAN RIGHTS OMBUDSMAN Annual 2000 The Sixth Annual Report report Abbreviated version Ljubljana, June 2001 Republic of Slovenia Human Rights Ombudsman Annual Report 2000 (The Sixth Annual Report - Abbreviated version) Edited by: Office of the Human Rights Ombudsman, June 2001 Translation: Amidas Design: Atelier IM Number of copies: 700 Photos: Archives of the Office of the Human Rights Ombudsman Published by: Tiskarna Ljubljana Annual and special reports of the Human Rights Ombudsman are also published on web http://www.varuh-rs.si ISSN 1318-9255 CONTENTS Page Introduction . .7 1. Assessment of the respecting of human rights and legal security in the country . .8 2. Issues dealt with . .11 2.1. Fundamental constitutional rights . .11 2.1.1. Elections and electoral legislation . .11 2.1.2. Media ethics . .14 2.1.3. The police acted more effectively after our proposals of more careful treatment of acts of violence which are clearly racially motivated . .14 2.1.4. Access to information of a public nature . .15 2.1.5. Access to information on the environment . .16 2.2. Restrictions of personal freedom . .16 2.2.1. Persons in custody and persons serving prison sentences . .16 2.2.2. Persons with mental disorders . .22 2.3. Judicature . .27 2.3.1. Judicial proceedings . .27 2.3.2. The Public Prosecutor’s Office . .34 2.3.3. Violations proceedings . .37 2.3.4. Attorneys-at-law . .38 2.3.5. Notaries . .39 2.4. Police procedures . .40 2.5. Administrative affairs . .47 2.5.1. General . .47 2.5.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Geospatial Information Management Country Report Of
    T: +386 1 478 48 00 F: +386 1 478 48 34 E: [email protected] Zemljemerska ulica 12, 1000 Ljubljana http://www.gu.gov.s Global Geospatial Information Management Country Report of Slovenia Submitted by: Tomaž Petek 1 Contents Slovenia ................................................................................................................................................... 3 About the Surveying and Mapping Authority of the Republic of Slovenia ............................................. 3 Main tasks and activities ..................................................................................................................... 4 Real Estate Office ............................................................................................................................ 5 Mass Real Estate Valuation Office ................................................................................................... 5 Geodesy Office ................................................................................................................................ 7 Regional Surveying and Mapping Authorities ................................................................................. 8 Coordination of Spatial Data Infrastructure in Slovenia ......................................................................... 9 SDI Stakeholders ...................................................................................................................................... 9 Relations with third parties ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Izobraževalni Center Geoss Education Centre Geoss Partner Information Form
    Izobraževalni center GEOSS d.o.o. Cesta komandanta Staneta 2 1270 Litija T: 01/8980 570 M: 031/759 355 Izobraževalni center Geoss Education centre Geoss Partner Information Form www.ic-geoss.si Izobraževalni center Geoss d.o.o. DŠ: SI10607838 MŠ: 3394930000IBAN: SI56 0202 3025 7398 917 Organisation PIC 932356435 Organization ID E10076694 Full legal name (National Language) IZOBRAŽEVALNI CENTER GEOSS D.O.O. Full legal name (Latin characters) EDUCATION CENTRE GEOSS LTD. Acronym IC GEOSS D.O.O. National ID (if applicable) / Department (if applicable) / Address Cesta komandanta Staneta 2 Country Slovenia Region Zasavska P.O. Box 34 Post Code 1270 Registration Number 3394930000 VAT number SI10607838 CEDEX / City Litija Website www.ic-geoss.si Email [email protected] Telephone 1 +38618980570 Telephone 2 +38631759355 Fax / Profile Type of organization (Please choose from School/ Institute/ Education centre - Adult the drop-down list on the right side) education Is your organisation a public body? NO Is your organisation a non-profit? YES Legal representative Title Mrs Gender Female First Name Sabina Family Name Rovšek Department / Position Director Email [email protected] Telephone 1 +38641906436 Contact person Title Mrs Gender Female Izobraževalni center Geoss d.o.o. DŠ: SI10607838 MŠ: 3394930000IBAN: SI56 0202 3025 7398 917 First Name Sandra Family Name Katić Department / Position Head of Informal Education Email [email protected] Telephone 1 +38640358587 Background and Experience Education Centre Geoss Ltd. (IC Geoss), Litija, Slovenia has 60 years of experience in the field of education and regional development in Municipality of Litija and wider in the region of Central Slovenia.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Handbook
    EUth – Tools and Tips for Mobile and Digital Youth Participation in and across Europe Project acronym: EUth Project no: 649594 WP 8: Trieste-Koper cross-border and Heart of Slovenia pilots setup Formal Deliverable D8.1 Pilots setup Distribution: Restricted Version 0.9 12.07.2016 Start date of project: 01.03.2015 Duration: 36 months Authors: Carlo Sessa, Margaret Pesuit /ISIS, Giovanni Delli Zotti/University of Trieste, Zorana Medaric/University of Primorska, Anita Molka /Heart of Slovenia, Luis Guillermo Martinez Ballesteros/KTH EUth 649594 D8.1 – Trieste-Koper cross-border and Heart of Slovenia pilot setup Section 0 Change Control Version # Date Author Organisation 0.0 07.04.2016 Carlo Sessa ISIS 0.1 19.04.2016 Carlo Sessa, Margaret Pesuit ISIS 0.2 20.04.2016 Giovanni Delli Zotti University Trieste 0.3 21.04. 2016 Zorana Medaritc University Primoska 0.4 22.04.2016 Anita Molka Hearth of Slovenia 0.5 25.04.2016 Carlo Sessa ISIS 0.6 02.05.2016 Carlo Sessa ISIS 0,7 04.05.2016 Margaret Pesuit ISIS 0.8 06.05.2016 Carlo Sessa ISIS 0.9 11.07.2016 Luis Guillermo Martinez KTH Ballesteros 1.0 12.07.2016 Carlo Sessa ISIS Change History Version 0.9 is the final deliverable including new section illustrating the evaluation plan, as requested after the mid-term review of the project Release Approval Name Role Date Kerstin Franzl Coordinator 12.07.2016 All comments, additions or changes should be addressed to the originator Carlo Sessa at: [email protected] EUth Page 2 of 102 EUth 649594 D8.1 – Trieste-Koper cross-border and Heart of Slovenia pilot setup Section 1 Contents Section 0 Change Control .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ARHIV 111 Let NOTRANJOST X
    1898-2009 Ljubljana, 2009 Mag. Janez Kopač Nataša Budna Kodrič Tatjana Šenk 111 Years of Historical Archive Ljubljana © 2009 Zgodovinski arhiv Ljubljana Published by Historical Archive Ljubljana Mestni trg 27, SI-1000 Ljubljana telephone: (01) 306 13 06 telefax: (01) 426 43 03 e-mail: [email protected] Editorial Board: Nataša Budna Kodrič, Tatjana Šenk, Barbara Pešak Mikec Translation: Martin Cregeen Photography: Vlastja Simončič, Božo Otorepec, Silvan Demšar, Marjana Kos, Dragica Kokalj, Darinka Mladenovič, Tatjana Rodošek, Tina Arh Design: Andreja Aljančič Povirk Print: Simpro d.o.o. Print run: 300 copies -2- At the time of the centenary of its foundation, in addition to an exhibition, Historical Archive Ljubljana prepared an exhibition catalogue, a chronicle of the development of the archive with a list of employees and photographs of more important events, which received a very good response from associates and fellow archivists. It very quickly became out of stock, and for a number of years we planned to reprint it. During that time, changes occurred that needed to be taken into account, and by the time we had waited a little, a whole decade had passed. One hundred and eleven years of archive activity is again a suitable period to look back, to write a chronicle and to produce a report on our major and minor successes. And to report this to the wider public, not just our colleagues and associates; even those who perhaps know nothing about us, for whom an archive still means a cupboard with dusty files. So before us is an supplemented publication of the chronicle of Historical Archive Ljubljana, from 1898 to 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • LABIN LITIJA Invites You to Learn
    LABIN THE STORY OF MINING TOWNS LITIJA& MINE TOUR LITIJA 194 km LABIN The rich mining heritage of Labin and Litija can be learned about through an extensive collection of mining items, geological and mining maps, written documentation, old postcards, photographs and archival lms showing the development of mining in both cities. In Labin, actors will take you back in time. Through the stories of miners, you will get to know their way of life and the historical facts that inuenced the creation of this mining town. In Litija, you will enter the Sitarjevec mine accompanied by a guide, discover the secrets of the underground world and get to know the mine and the work of miners in an authentic environment. Discover MINE TOUR: www.mine-tour.eu minetourproject Mobile applications minetour.app LABIN invites you to learn In the eastern part of Istria, at a distance of only three kilometres from the sea, lies the medieval town of Labin. It is a town of rich cultural and historical heritage and a unique combination of natural beauty for an active holiday with magnicent gastronomic symphonies provided by numerous local restaurants and taverns. The city is divided into two parts: the old and the new part. The old part of town is located on a hill situated at 320 m above sea level and with a very picturesque appearance. The new part, located at the foot of the hill, is of interesting architecture created as a reection of centuries of mining. Doors of St. Flora represent the entrance to the Old Town and the inspiring story of the place, its historical and cultural tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • Administrative Unit: University of Padova
    Administrative unit: University of Padova Department: Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry (LEAF) ___________________________________________________________________ Ph.D. Program: Land, Environment, Resources and Health (LERH) Batch: XXXII Governance Capacity of Public Actors for Forest-Based Social Innovation PhD Program Coordinator: Prof. Davide Matteo Pettenella Supervisor: Prof. Laura Secco Co-supervisors: Prof. Dr. Margaret A. Shannon Faculty of Environmental and Natural Resources, Institute of Environmental Social Sciences and Geography, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany Dr. Gerhard Weiss University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, BOKU and EFI- European Forest Institute Forest Policy Research Network, Vienna, Austria Ph.D. candidate: Todora Rogelja Sede Amministrativa: Università degli Studi di Padova Dipartimento Territorio e Sistemi Agro-Forestali (TESAF) ___________________________________________________________________ CORSO DI DOTTORATO DI RICERCA: Land, Environment, Resources, Health (LERH) Ciclo: XXXII La Capacità di Governance degli Attori Pubblici per una Innovazione Sociale in Ambito Forestale Coordinatore: Prof. Davide Matteo Pettenella Supervisore: Prof. Laura Secco Co-Supervisore: Prof. Dr. Margaret A. Shannon Faculty of Environmental and Natural Resources, Institute of Environmental Social Sciences and Geography, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany Dr. Gerhard Weiss University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, BOKU and EFI- European Forest Institute Forest Policy Research
    [Show full text]
  • National Energy Efficiency Action Plan 2014–2020
    REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA MINISTRY OF INFRASTRUCTURE NATIONAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY ACTION PLAN 2014–2020 (AN URE 2020) May 2015 CONTENTS SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................................ 9 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 10 1.1. ACHIEVEMENT OF PREVIOUS ENERGY EFFICIENCY TARGETS.................................................................................... 10 1.2. NATIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES ........................................................................................................................... 10 1.3. WIDER STRATEGY FRAMEWORK FOR THE PLANNING OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY MEASURES .............................................. 13 2. OVERVIEW OF NATIONAL ENERGY TARGETS AND THE SAVINGS ACHIEVED ........................................... 15 2.1. OVERVIEW OF NATIONAL 2020 ENERGY EFFICIENCY TARGETS ............................................................................... 15 2.2. OTHER TARGETS FOR INCREASING ENERGY EFFICIENCY ......................................................................................... 16 2.3. ENERGY SAVINGS ACHIEVED AND THE TARGET ENERGY SAVINGS ............................................................................. 16 2.4. OVERVIEW OF END-ENERGY SAVINGS ............................................................................................................... 18 3.
    [Show full text]