Administrative Unit: University of Padova
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Administrative unit: University of Padova Department: Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry (LEAF) ___________________________________________________________________ Ph.D. Program: Land, Environment, Resources and Health (LERH) Batch: XXXII Governance Capacity of Public Actors for Forest-Based Social Innovation PhD Program Coordinator: Prof. Davide Matteo Pettenella Supervisor: Prof. Laura Secco Co-supervisors: Prof. Dr. Margaret A. Shannon Faculty of Environmental and Natural Resources, Institute of Environmental Social Sciences and Geography, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany Dr. Gerhard Weiss University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, BOKU and EFI- European Forest Institute Forest Policy Research Network, Vienna, Austria Ph.D. candidate: Todora Rogelja Sede Amministrativa: Università degli Studi di Padova Dipartimento Territorio e Sistemi Agro-Forestali (TESAF) ___________________________________________________________________ CORSO DI DOTTORATO DI RICERCA: Land, Environment, Resources, Health (LERH) Ciclo: XXXII La Capacità di Governance degli Attori Pubblici per una Innovazione Sociale in Ambito Forestale Coordinatore: Prof. Davide Matteo Pettenella Supervisore: Prof. Laura Secco Co-Supervisore: Prof. Dr. Margaret A. Shannon Faculty of Environmental and Natural Resources, Institute of Environmental Social Sciences and Geography, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany Dr. Gerhard Weiss University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, BOKU and EFI- European Forest Institute Forest Policy Research Network, Vienna, Austria Dottorando: Todora Rogelja To Luna Where there’s a will there’s a way. CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................................ i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................................... iii SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... iv SUMMARIO .................................................................................................................................... vi I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Research background ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Forest governance, social innovation, and public actors ........................................................ 3 1.2.1. Forest governance ....................................................................................................... 3 1.2.2. Social innovation ......................................................................................................... 5 1.2.3. Public actors and governance capacity for social innovation ..................................... 8 1.3 Research aim, objectives, questions and outcomes .............................................................. 10 II. LITERATURE REVIEW AND ANALYSIS .......................................................................... 14 2. Study 1: Towards the framework for analyzing the governance capacity of public actors for social innovation .................................................................................................................. 14 2.1 Abstract ................................................................................................................................ 15 2.2 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 16 2.3 Methodology and methods ................................................................................................... 18 2.4 Results .................................................................................................................................. 23 2.4.1 Studies on governance capacity ................................................................................ 23 2.4.2 Social innovation studies ........................................................................................... 31 2.5 Discussion ............................................................................................................................ 36 2.6 Conclusions .......................................................................................................................... 43 III. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................... 45 3.1. Research design .................................................................................................................... 45 3.2. Methodology and methods ................................................................................................... 47 3.2.1 Phase I: Literature review and analysis ..................................................................... 47 3.2.2 Phase II: Survey ........................................................................................................ 49 3.2.3 Phase III: Case study ................................................................................................. 51 IV. RESULTS ................................................................................................................................ 53 4.1 Study 2: Roles of public actors in social innovation initiatives in marginalized rural areas 53 4.1.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 54 4.1.2 Methods ..................................................................................................................... 55 4.1.3 Results ....................................................................................................................... 56 4.1.4 Discussion and conclusions ....................................................................................... 60 4.2 Introduction to the case study............................................................................................... 63 4.2.1 The case study area: Dole pri Litiji, central Slovenia ............................................... 63 4.2.2 The development of the Charcoal Land initiative and reconfiguration charcoal burning practice ................................................................................................................ 66 4.3 Study 3: Role of public actors in the forest-based social innovation - The case of the Charcoal Land initiative in Slovenia ................................................................................................... 72 4.3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 73 4.3.2 Conceptual considerations: Social innovation, public actors, and their roles ........... 75 4.3.3 Methodology and methods ........................................................................................ 77 4.3.4 Analysis and Results ................................................................................................. 81 4.3.5 Discussion ................................................................................................................. 92 4.3.6 Conclusion ................................................................................................................. 94 4.4 Study 4: Implications of policy framework conditions for the development of forest-based social innovation in Slovenia ............................................................................................... 96 4.4.1 Abstract ..................................................................................................................... 97 4.4.2 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 98 4.4.3 Methods ................................................................................................................... 100 4.4.4 How are EU policies on SI reflected in Slovenian policy documents relevant to forestry? .......................................................................................................................... 104 4.4.5 What are the implications of Slovenian policy framework conditions for the development of forestry-based SI initiatives? ................................................................ 111 4.4.6 Conclusions ............................................................................................................. 113 4.4.7 Acknowledgments ................................................................................................... 115 V. GENERAL DISCUSSION .................................................................................................... 116 5.1. Exploring the governance capacity of public actors for forest-based social innovation .... 116 5.2. Limitations of the research ................................................................................................. 121 VI. CONCLUSIONS.................................................................................................................... 124 VII. References .............................................................................................................................. 128 VIII.Annexes ................................................................................................................................