Revenue – IFRS 15 Handbook

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Revenue IFRS®15 handbook June 2019 home.kpmg/ifrs Contents Facing new challenges 1 7.3 Amortisation 187 Overview 2 7.4 Impairment 192 1 Step 1 – Identify the contract with a customer 3 8 Contract modifications 194 1.1 Criteria to determine whether a contract 8.1 Identifying a contract modification 194 exists 3 8.2 Accounting for a contract modification 198 1.2 Contract term 14 9 Licensing 206 1.3 Consideration received before a contract 9.1 Licences of intellectual property 207 exists 17 9.2 Determining whether a licence is distinct 209 1.4 Combination of contracts 19 9.3 Determining the nature of a distinct licence 214 2 Step 2 – Identify the performance obligations 9.4 Timing and pattern of revenue recognition 220 in the contract 23 9.5 Contractual restrictions and attributes of 2.1 Distinct goods or services 24 licences 223 2.2 Implied promises and administrative tasks 35 9.6 Sales- or usage-based royalties 225 2.3 Series of distinct goods or services 39 10 Other application issues 234 3 Step 3 – Determine the transaction price 46 10.1 Sale with a right of return 234 3.1 Variable consideration (and the constraint) 47 10.2 Warranties 239 3.2 Significant financing component 63 10.3 Principal vs agent considerations 244 3.3 Non-cash consideration 78 10.4 Customer options for additional goods 3.4 Consideration payable to a customer 81 or services 263 3.5 Sales taxes 88 10.5 Customers’ unexercised rights (breakage) 285 10.6 Non-refundable up-front fees 289 4 Step 4 – Allocate the transaction price to the 10.7 Sales outside ordinary activities 295 performance obligations in the contract 90 4.1 Determine stand-alone selling prices 91 11 Presentation 299 4.2 Allocate the transaction price 98 11.1 Statement of financial position 299 4.3 Changes in the transaction price 111 11.2 Statements of profit or loss and cash flows 312 5 Step 5 – Recognise revenue when or as the 12 Disclosure 316 entity satisfies a performance obligation 113 12.1 Annual disclosure 316 5.1 Transfer of control 114 12.2 Interim disclosures 325 5.2 Performance obligations satisfied over time 115 13 Effective date and transition 326 5.3 Measuring progress towards complete 13.1 Transition 326 satisfaction of a performance obligation 131 13.2 Retrospective method 328 5.4 Performance obligations satisfied at a point 13.3 Cumulative effect method 337 in time 148 13.4 Consequential amendments to other IFRS 5.5 Repurchase agreements 151 requirements 341 5.6 Consignment arrangements 156 13.5 First-time adoption 342 5.7 Bill-and-hold arrangements 159 Guidance referenced 344 5.8 Customer acceptance 161 Detailed contents 345 6 Scope 162 6.1 In scope 162 Index of examples 348 6.2 Out of scope 163 Index of KPMG insights 355 6.3 Partially in scope 165 About this publication 363 6.4 Portfolio approach 171 Keeping in touch 364 7 Contract costs 173 7.1 Costs of obtaining a contract 173 Acknowledgments 366 7.2 Costs of fulfilling a contract 179 Facing new challenges Reporting revenue under IFRS 15 is now one of the ordinary activities of companies in the 100+ countries that use IFRS Standards. So this feels like the right time to take stock – to pull together, in one place, what we have learned about this new world of revenue recognition. Over the past five years, we – like you – have wrestled with the many challenges of implementing IFRS 15. In doing so, we have gained extensive insight and hands- on experience across different industries and geographies. And we are delighted to share our experience with you in our IFRS 15 handbook: Revenue. It provides detailed guidance, illustrative examples and extensive discussion of the areas that companies have found most complex. Looking forward, as your business grows and evolves – whether by developing new products and services, embedding technological innovations or buying new businesses – we hope this handbook will be your go-to resource as you apply IFRS 15 to new facts and circumstances. Prabhakar Kalavacherla (PK) Brian O’Donovan Anne Schurbohm Kim Heng KPMG Global Revenue Recognition Leadership Team © 2019 KPMG IFRG Limited, a UK company, limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. 2 | Revenue – IFRS 15 handbook Overview This handbook provides a detailed analysis of the revenue standard, IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers, including insights and examples to help entities to navigate the revenue recognition requirements. In many cases, further analysis and interpretation may be needed for an entity to apply the requirements to its own facts, circumstances and individual transactions. Furthermore, some of our insights may change and new insights will be developed as issues from the implementation of the revenue standard arise and as practice evolves. Organisation of the text The following diagram highlights the layout of the revenue standard and the corresponding sections in this handbook. Each section provides an overview, the requirements of the standard, examples illustrating basic scenarios and our insights. Some sections also have additional application examples illustrating more complex scenarios or sector-specific issues. 5-step model (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Step 1– Step 2– Step 3– Step 4– Step 5– Identify the Identify Determine Allocate the Recognise contract performance the transaction transaction revenue obligations price price (6) Scope Other recognition and measurement guidance (7) (8) (9) (10) Contract Contract Licensing Other application costs modifications issues Presentation and implementation (11) (12) (13) Presentation Disclosure Effective date and transition © 2019 KPMG IFRG Limited, a UK company, limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. 1 Step 1 – Identify the contract with a customer | 3 1.1 Criteria to determine whether a contract exists | 1 Step 1 – Identify the contract with a customer Overview A contract with a customer is in the scope of the standard when the contract is legally enforceable and certain criteria are met. If the criteria are not met, then the contract does not exist for the purpose of applying the general model of the standard, and any consideration received from the customer is generally recognised as a deposit (liability). Contracts entered into at or near the same time with the same customer (or a related party of the customer) are combined and treated as a single contract when certain criteria are met. 1.1 Criteria to determine whether a contract exists IFRS 15.10 The standard defines a ‘contract’ as an agreement between two or more parties that creates enforceable rights and obligations and specifies that enforceability is a matter of law. Contracts can be written, oral or implied by an entity’s customary business practices. IFRS 15.12 A contract does not exist when each party has the unilateral right to terminate a wholly unperformed contract without compensation. IFRS 15.9 A contract with a customer is in the scope of the standard when it is legally enforceable and meets all of the following criteria. ... collection of ... rights to goods consideration is or services and probable payment terms can be identified A contract exists if... ... it is approved and the parties are ... it has commercial committed to substance their obligations © 2019 KPMG IFRG Limited, a UK company, limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. 4 | Revenue – IFRS 15 handbook IFRS 15.9(e) In making the collectability assessment, an entity considers the customer’s ability and intention (which includes assessing its credit-worthiness) to pay the amount of consideration when it is due. This assessment is made after taking into account any price concessions that the entity may offer to the customer (see Section 3.1). IFRS 15.14 If the criteria are not initially met, then an entity continually reassesses the contract against them and applies the requirements of the standard to the contract from the date on which the criteria are met. Any consideration received for a contract that does not meet the criteria is accounted for under the requirements in Section 1.3. IFRS 15.13 If a contract meets all of the criteria at contract inception, then an entity does not reassess the criteria unless there is an indication of a significant change in the facts and circumstances. If on reassessment an entity determines that the criteria are no longer met, then it ceases to apply the standard to the contract from that date, but does not reverse any revenue previously recognised. Example 1 – Assessing the existence of a contract: Sale of real estate In an agreement to sell real estate, Seller X assesses the existence of a contract. In making this assessment, X considers factors such as: – the buyer’s available financial resources; – the buyer’s commitment to the contract, which may be determined based on the importance of the property to the buyer’s operations; – X’s prior experience with similar contracts and buyers under similar circumstances; – X’s intention to enforce its contractual rights; – the payment terms of the arrangement; and – whether X’s receivable is subject to future subordination. If X concludes that it is not probable that it will collect the amount to which it expects to be entitled, then a contract to transfer control of the real estate does not exist. Instead, X applies the guidance on consideration received before concluding that a contract exists (see Section 1.3), and initially accounts for any cash collected as a deposit (liability). © 2019 KPMG IFRG Limited, a UK company, limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. 1 Step 1 – Identify the contract with a customer | 5 1.1 Criteria to determine whether a contract exists | Example 2 – Assessing the existence of a contract: No written sales agreement Shoe Manufacturer S holds products available to ship to customers before the end of its current fiscal year.
Recommended publications
  • Requirements of Timely Performance in Time and Voyage Charterparties

    Requirements of Timely Performance in Time and Voyage Charterparties

    Graduate School REQUIREMENTS OF TIMELY PERFORMANCE IN TIME AND VOYAGE CHARTERPARTIES - AN EXPLORATION OF THEIR IDENTITY, SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS UNDER ENGLISH LAW Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Leicester by Tamaraudoubra Tom Egbe School of Law University of Leicester 2019 Abstract REQUIREMENTS OF TIMELY PERFORMANCE IN TIME AND VOYAGE CHARTERPARTIES - AN EXPLORATION OF THEIR IDENTITY, SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS UNDER ENGLISH LAW By Tamaraudoubra Tom Egbe The importance of time in the performance of contractual obligations under sea carriage of goods arrangements are until now little explored. For the avoidance of breach, certain obligations and responsibilities of the parties to the contract need to be performed promptly. Ocean transport is an expensive venture and a shipowner could suffer considerable financial losses if an unnecessary but serious delay interrupt the vessel’s earning power in the course of the charterer’s performance of his contractual obligation. On the other hand, a charterer could also incur a substantial loss if arrangements for the shipment and receipt of cargo fail to go according to plan as a result of the shipowner’s failure to perform his charterparty obligation timely and with reasonable diligence. With these considerations in mind, this thesis critically explores the concept of timely performance in the discharge of the contractual obligations of parties to a contract of carriage. While the thesis is not an expository of the occurrence of time in all the obligations of parties to the carriage contract, it focusses particularly on the identity, scope, and limitations of timeliness in the context of timely payment of hire, laytime and reasonable despatch.
  • Contracts Course

    Contracts Course

    Contracts A Contract A contract is a legally enforceable agreement between two or more parties with mutual obligations. The remedy at law for breach of contract is "damages" or monetary compensation. In equity, the remedy can be specific performance of the contract or an injunction. Both remedies award the damaged party the "benefit of the bargain" or expectation damages, which are greater than mere reliance damages, as in promissory estoppels. Origin and Scope Contract law is based on the principle expressed in the Latin phrase pacta sunt servanda, which is usually translated "agreements to be kept" but more literally means, "pacts must be kept". Contract law can be classified, as is habitual in civil law systems, as part of a general law of obligations, along with tort, unjust enrichment, and restitution. As a means of economic ordering, contract relies on the notion of consensual exchange and has been extensively discussed in broader economic, sociological, and anthropological terms. In American English, the term extends beyond the legal meaning to encompass a broader category of agreements. Such jurisdictions usually retain a high degree of freedom of contract, with parties largely at liberty to set their own terms. This is in contrast to the civil law, which typically applies certain overarching principles to disputes arising out of contract, as in the French Civil Code. However, contract is a form of economic ordering common throughout the world, and different rules apply in jurisdictions applying civil law (derived from Roman law principles), Islamic law, socialist legal systems, and customary or local law. 2014 All Star Training, Inc.
  • Supreme Court of the United States

    Supreme Court of the United States

    No. _________ ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- BULK JULIANA LTD. and M/V BULK JULIANA, her engines, tackle, apparel, etc., in rem, Petitioners, versus WORLD FUEL SERVICES (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD., Respondent. --------------------------------- --------------------------------- On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Fifth Circuit --------------------------------- --------------------------------- PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI --------------------------------- --------------------------------- PETER B. SLOSS Counsel of Record [email protected] ROBERT H. MURPHY [email protected] DONALD R. WING [email protected] MURPHY, ROGERS, SLOSS, GAMBEL & TOMPKINS, APLC 701 Poydras Street, Suite 400 New Orleans, Louisiana 70139 Telephone: (504) 523-0400 Attorneys for Claimant-Petitioner, Bulk Juliana Ltd., appearing solely as the Owner and Claimant of the M/V BULK JULIANA ================================================================ COCKLE LEGAL BRIEFS (800) 225-6964 WWW.COCKLELEGALBRIEFS.COM i QUESTIONS PRESENTED This petition presents the following unsettled questions of federal maritime law, which are of wide- spread commercial importance to the global shipping community and should be resolved by this Court: 1. Under U.S. law, a maritime necessaries lien arises solely by operation of law and cannot be created by con- tract. Here, a Singapore fuel supplier claims
  • IATA Industry Accounting Working Group Guidance IFRS 15, Revenue from Contracts with Customers

    IATA Industry Accounting Working Group Guidance IFRS 15, Revenue from Contracts with Customers

    IATA Industry Accounting Working Group Guidance IFRS 15, Revenue from Contracts with Customers 2nd Edition Issued May 2018 IATA Industry Accounting Working Group Guidance IFRS 15, Revenue from Contracts with Customers NOTICE DISCLAIMER. This document has been compiled by the IATA Industry Accounting Working Group (IAWG), which consists of senior finance representatives from IATA member airlines. This working group’s mandate is to promote consistency in the application of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and to lobby accounting standard setters to take into consideration the interests of airlines globally. It is distributed with the understanding that IATA, the IAWG and its members, observers and advisors are not rendering accounting, legal or other professional services in this publication. If accounting, legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought. The paper addresses a specific issue related to the adoption of IFRS 15, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This paper is not intended to provide accounting advice or a definitive analysis of the underlying issue as fact patterns, regulatory environment, practices and interpretations may vary. The views taken should not be used as a substitute for referring to the standards and interpretations of IFRS or professional advice from your auditor or other professional accounting advisor. The information contained in this publication is subject to constant review in the light of changing government requirements and regulations. No subscriber or other reader should act on the basis of any such information without referring to applicable laws and regulations and/or without taking appropriate professional advice. Although every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, the International Air Transport Association shall not be held responsible for any loss or damage caused by errors, omissions, misprints or misinterpretation of the contents hereof.
  • IFRS 15 IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers Is Issued

    IFRS 15 IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers Is Issued

    IFRS 15 IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers is issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (the Board). IFRS Standards together with their accompanying documents are issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (the “Board”). Disclaimer: To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Board and the IFRS Foundation (Foundation) expressly disclaim all liability howsoever arising from this publication or any translation thereof whether in contract, tort or otherwise (including, but not limited to, liability for any negligent act or omission) to any person in respect of any claims or losses of any nature including direct, indirect, incidental or consequential loss, punitive damages, penalties or costs. Information contained in this publication does not constitute advice and should not be substituted for the services of an appropriately qualified professional. Copyright © IFRS Foundation All rights reserved. Reproduction and use rights are strictly limited. Contact the Foundation for further details at [email protected]. Copies of IASB publications may be obtained from the Foundation’s Publications Department. Please address publication and copyright matters to: IFRS Foundation Publications Department 30 Cannon Street, London, EC4M 6XH, United Kingdom. Tel: +44 (0)20 7332 2730 Fax: +44 (0)20 7332 2749 Email: [email protected] Web: www.ifrs.org The IFRS Foundation logo, the IASB logo, the IFRS for SMEs logo, the “Hexagon Device”, “IFRS Foundation”, “eIFRS”, “IAS”, “IASB”, “IFRS for SMEs”, “IASs”, “IFRS”, “IFRSs”,
  • IFRS 9, Financial Instruments Understanding the Basics Introduction

    IFRS 9, Financial Instruments Understanding the Basics Introduction

    www.pwc.com/ifrs9 IFRS 9, Financial Instruments Understanding the basics Introduction Revenue isn’t the only new IFRS to worry about for 2018—there is IFRS 9, Financial Instruments, to consider as well. Contrary to widespread belief, IFRS 9 affects more than just financial institutions. Any entity could have significant changes to its financial reporting as the result of this standard. That is certain to be the case for those with long-term loans, equity investments, or any non- vanilla financial assets. It might even be the case for those only holding short- term receivables. It all depends. Possible consequences of IFRS 9 include: • More income statement volatility. IFRS 9 raises the risk that more assets will have to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in profit and loss as they arise. • Earlier recognition of impairment losses on receivables and loans, including trade receivables. Entities will have to start providing for possible future credit losses in the very first reporting period a loan goes on the books – even if it is highly likely that the asset will be fully collectible. • Significant new disclosure requirements—the more significantly impacted may need new systems and processes to collect the necessary data. IFRS 9 also includes significant new hedging requirements, which we address in a separate publication – Practical guide – General hedge accounting. With careful planning, the changes that IFRS 9 introduces might provide a great opportunity for balance sheet optimization, or enhanced efficiency of the reporting process and cost savings. Left too long, they could lead to some nasty surprises.
  • Bills of Lading Vs Sea Waybills, and the Himalaya Clause Peter G

    Bills of Lading Vs Sea Waybills, and the Himalaya Clause Peter G

    Bills of Lading vs Sea Waybills, and The Himalaya Clause Peter G. Pamel and Robert C. Wilkins Borden Ladner Gervais, LLP Presented at the NJI/CMLA, Federal Court and Federal Court of Appeal Canadian Maritime Law Association Seminar April 15, 2011 Fairmont Château Laurier, Ottawa 1) Introduction Bills of lading and sea waybills are two of the most common forms of transport document used in contemporary shipping. Their similarities and difference, and respective uses, in such trade should be clearly understood by all who are involved in that activity. In particular the meaning of “document of title” used in respect of bills of lading, and whether sea waybills are or are not also such documents of title, have given rise to much debate, which has now largely been resolved in major shipping nations. Also, the impact on these transport documents of compulsorily applicable liability regimes set out in international carriage of goods by sea conventions is also essential to a proper grasp of the role these documents play in international maritime commerce. It is also interesting to examine how parties other than carriers, shippers and consignees can and do benefit from certain clauses in ocean bills of lading and sea waybills which purport to confer on such third parties or classes of them the exemptions from, and limitations of, liability which marine carriers assume in the performance of their functions. This paper will attempt to provide an overview of these issues, with special reference to how they are addressed in Canadian maritime law. 2) Bills of Lading and Sea Waybills in Modern Shipping Bills of lading and sea waybills are the two basic documents that attest to the carriage of goods by water, both domestically within Canada and internationally.
  • AC501 (M) MAY 20131 IDE AC501 (M) MAY 2013 Page 1 Of8 UNIVERSITY of SWAZILAND DEP ARTMENT of ACCOUNTING MAIN EXAMINATION PAPER, MAY 2013

    AC501 (M) MAY 20131 IDE AC501 (M) MAY 2013 Page 1 Of8 UNIVERSITY of SWAZILAND DEP ARTMENT of ACCOUNTING MAIN EXAMINATION PAPER, MAY 2013

    AC501 (M) MAY 20131 IDE AC501 (M) MAY 2013 Page 1 of8 UNIVERSITY OF SWAZILAND DEP ARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING MAIN EXAMINATION PAPER, MAY 2013 DEGREEI DIPLOMA AND YEAR OF STUDY RCOMV TITLE OF PAPER FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 1V COURSE CODE AC501 (M) MAY 2013 (Full-time) IDE AC501 (M) MAY 2013 (PART-TIME) TIME ALLOWED THREE (3) HOURS TOTAL MARKS 100 MARKS INSTRUCTIONS 1 There are four (4) questions on this paper. 2 Answer all four (4) questions. 2 Begin the solution to each question on a new page. 3 The marks awarded for a question are indicated at the end ofeach question. 4 Show the necessary working. 5 Calculations are to be made to zero decimal places of accuracy, unless otherwise instructed. Note: You are reminded that in assessing your work, account will be taken of accuracy of the language and general quality of expression, together with layout and presentation of your answer. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: CALCULATOR THIS PAPER IS NOT TO BE OPENED UNTIL PERMISSION HAS BEEN GRANTED BY THE INVIGILATOR OR SUPERVISOR. AC501 (M) MAY 20131 IDE AC501 (M) MAY 2013 Page 2 ofS QUESTION 1 . The Statement of financial position of Anstone Co, Yals Co and Zoo Co at 31 March 2012 are summarized as follows . • "L...""' .....,,··~.·cO : Non current assets Freehold property , Plant and machin~ry . 310,000 3,000 . Investment in subsidiaries Shares, at cost 110,000 6,~00 Loan account 3!f.iO() . Current accounts 10,000 12,200 120,000 22,200 Current assets Inventories 170,000 , .. , 15,()()() . Receivables 140,000 50,000 1,000 Cash at bank 60,000 4,000 370,000 20,000 800,000 289,200 23,000 Equity and liabilities EClui~y Ordinary share capital 200,000 10,000 Retained earnings 129,200 -1,000 579,600 229,200 ' .
  • INCOTERMS® 2010: Codified Mercantile Custom Or Standard Contract Terms?

    INCOTERMS® 2010: Codified Mercantile Custom Or Standard Contract Terms?

    INCOTERMS® 2010: CODIFIED MERCANTILE CUSTOM OR STANDARD CONTRACT TERMS? Juana Coetzee BA LLB LLM LLD Senior Lecturer, Department of Mercantile Law, Stellenbosch University* 1 Introduction Trade terms represent commercial customs and usages1 that have developed over centuries in a particular trade or region.2 They function as contractual terms which indicate in abbreviated form the seller and buyer’s respective delivery obligations, and at the same time they allocate the risk and costs connected to delivery.3 When trade terms are understood uniformly they fulfil a harmonisation function in international trade. Because merchants know what is expected from them, trade terms provide legal certainty, which means less disputes and lower transaction costs. However, studies have found that the understanding and interpretation of trade terms tend to differ from one country to the other or from one commercial sector to the next.4 In an effort to standardise the interpretation of trade term content, the International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”) formulated INCOTERMS®. The first edition was published in 1936 and thereafter revised in 1953, 1967, 1976, 1980, 1990, 2000 and 2010. The rules are accepted by governments, scholars, merchants and legal practitioners worldwide5 and have been endorsed by the United * Parts of this article are based on research that was conducted for my unpublished LLD dissertation INCOTERMS as a form of Standardisation in International Sales Law: The Interplay between Mercantile Custom and Substantive Sales Law with Specific
  • Earnings Per Share. the Two-Class Method Is an Earnings Allocation

    Earnings Per Share. the Two-Class Method Is an Earnings Allocation

    Earnings Per Share. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for common stock and participating securities, according to dividends declared and participation rights in undistributed earnings. Under this method, net earnings is reduced by the amount of dividends declared in the current period for common shareholders and participating security holders. The remaining earnings or “undistributed earnings” are allocated between common stock and participating securities to the extent that each security may share in earnings as if all of the earnings for the period had been distributed. Once calculated, the earnings per common share is computed by dividing the net (loss) earnings attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each year presented. Diluted (loss) earnings attributable to common shareholders per common share has been computed by dividing the net (loss) earnings attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the dilutive effect of options and restricted shares outstanding during the applicable periods computed using the treasury method. In cases where the Company has a net loss, no dilutive effect is shown as options and restricted stock become anti-dilutive. Fair Value of Financial Instruments. Disclosure of fair values is required for most on- and off-balance sheet financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value. This disclosure requirement excludes certain financial instruments, such as trade receivables and payables when the carrying value approximates the fair value, employee benefit obligations, lease contracts, and all nonfinancial instruments, such as land, buildings, and equipment.
  • U.S. GAAP Vs. IFRS: Long-Lived Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations

    U.S. GAAP Vs. IFRS: Long-Lived Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations

    U.S. GAAP vs. IFRS: Long-lived assets held for sale and discontinued operations Prepared by: Richard Stuart, Partner, National Professional Standards Group, RSM US LLP [email protected], +1 203 905 5027 July 2020 Introduction Currently, more than 120 countries require or permit the use of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), with a significant number of countries requiring IFRS (or some form of IFRS) by public entities (as defined by those specific countries). Of those countries that do not require use of IFRS by public entities, perhaps the most significant is the U.S. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires domestic registrants to apply U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), while foreign private issuers are allowed to use IFRS as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (which is the IFRS focused on in this comparison). While the SEC continues to discuss the possibility of allowing domestic registrants to provide supplemental financial information based on IFRS (with a reconciliation to U.S. GAAP), there does not appear to be a specified timeline for moving forward with that possibility. Although the SEC currently has no plans to permit the use of IFRS by domestic registrants, IFRS remains relevant to these entities, as well as private companies in the U.S., given the continued expansion of IFRS use across the globe. For example, many U.S. companies are part of multinational entities for which financial statements are prepared in accordance with IFRS, or may wish to compare themselves to such entities. Alternatively, a U.S. company’s business goals might include international expansion through organic growth or acquisitions.
  • Reducing Complexity in IAS 39

    Reducing Complexity in IAS 39

    technical update extra FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS Reducing complexity in IAS 39 MARTIN O’DONOVAN ANALYSES THE PROPOSALS ON REDUCING COMPLEXITY IN FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS. ll will agree that IAS 39, the accounting standard for financial instruments, is complex, but finding an alternative Executive summary is no easy matter. After years of acknowledging that I The International Accounting Standards Board has started the something must be done the International Accounting formal process of considering the possibilities for reducing AStandards Board (IASB) has issued a discussion paper considering complexity in IAS 39. Its discussion paper sets out thoughts on ways to reduce complexity in the reporting of financial instruments. the way financial instruments are measured and some ideas for The paper deliberately restricts itself to the problems arising from the simplifying hedge accounting. However, behind the openness to many ways by which financial instruments are measured as well as change, the board remains firmly wedded to the long-term aim hedge accounting. Derecognition and presentation and disclosures of extending the application of fair values. are not within its scope. Given that the IASB is very much in favour of full fair-value accounting, it starts from the assumption that fair value would be a good measurement attribute that in the long term should apply to all If the accounts are to be meaningful, surely it is important for the financial assets and liabilities. Certainly, when you consider the range user to understand whether the intention of management is to be a of valuation and measurement methods that currently exists, some trader seeking short-term profits or a longer-term holder, generating form of rationalisation is desirable.