DOCSLIB.ORG

Fair Value Measurement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fair Value Measurement Fair value measurement Handbook US GAAP and IFRS® Standards December 2020 home.kpmg Contents Contents Measuring fair value in unsettled times 1 About the standards 2 About this publication 4 A. An introduction to fair value measurement 7 B. Scope 9 C. The item being measured and the unit of account 20 D. Market participants 30 E. Principal and most advantageous markets 33 F. Valuation approaches and techniques 41 G. Inputs to valuation techniques 51 H. Fair value hierarchy 62 I. Fair value at initial recognition 71 J. Highest and best use 76 K. Liabilities and own equity instruments 80 L. Portfolio measurement exception 89 M. Inactive markets 95 N. Disclosures (before adopting ASU 2018-13) 99 N. Disclosures (after adopting ASU 2018-13) 113 O. Application issues: Derivatives and hedging 131 P. Application issues: Investments in investment funds 151 Q. Application issues: Practical expedient for investments in investment companies 157 Appendix: Index of questions and answers 166 Appendix: Effective dates – US GAAP 175 Acknowledgments 177 Keeping in touch 178 Measuring fair value in unsettled times Measuring fair value can present significant challenges for preparers of financial statements even in the best of times because it may involve judgment and estimation. It is even more difficult now due to the impact of COVID-19. The global pandemic has been labelled ‘a crisis like no other’ by the International Monetary Fund, and many countries have seen decreases in economic activity that are unprecedented in modern times. This stressed environment is testing the principles of ASC Topic 820 Fair Value Measurement and IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement and how companies can apply them consistently and transparently. Rapid changes in market perceptions and economic projections create challenges when determining fair value based on the information available to market participants at the measurement date. Greater estimation uncertainty and less observable market data may require companies to change valuation techniques and use more judgments and assumptions, which may lead to more Level 3 measurements. All of these factors increase the importance of providing disclosures around the key assumptions and judgments used, to help users of financial statements understand the impact of COVID-19 on a company’s fair value measurements. We are pleased to share our insight and practical guidance in the fifth edition of our Fair value measurement handbook. The publication will help you apply the principles of Topic 820 and IFRS 13 during these challenging times and understand the key differences between US GAAP and IFRS Standards. Kimber Bascom and Mahesh Narayanasami Chris Spall and Avi Victor Department of Professional Practice KPMG International KPMG in the US Standards Group © 2020 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. © 2020 KPMG IFRG Limited, a UK company, limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. 2 | Fair value measurement handbook About the standards Chronology and objective The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) originally issued Topic 820 as FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (FASB Statement 157) in September 2006. The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB® Board) issued the IFRS Standards equivalent, IFRS 13, in May 2011. At the same time, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in US GAAP and IFRSs. The ASU amended US GAAP to achieve the Boards’ objectives of a converged definition of fair value and substantially converged measurement and disclosure guidance. Subsequently, the FASB has issued various amendments to Topic 820, most notably: – ASU 2015-07, Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent), issued May 2015; and – ASU 2018-13, Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, issued August 2018. Certain of these amendments have resulted in further divergence between the standards (see the summary of key differences between US GAAP and IFRS Standards below). Despite these differences, Topic 820 and IFRS 13 remain aligned in that they define fair value, establish a framework for measuring fair value and a fair value hierarchy based on the source of the inputs used to estimate fair value, and require disclosures about fair value measurements. The standards do not establish new requirements for when fair value is required or permitted, but provide a single source of guidance on how fair value is measured. In general, this guidance is applied when fair value is required or permitted by other applicable GAAP. Summary of key differences Throughout this publication, we highlight what we believe are significant differences between US GAAP and between US GAAP and IFRS Standards. However, many of these differences do IFRS Standards not arise from the fair value measurement standards but because of the interaction of those standards with other requirements of US GAAP or IFRS Standards. For example, Question C90 discusses a difference related to ‘unit of account’, which is prescribed by other US GAAP that requires or permits the fair value measurement. Further, under US GAAP, certain requirements apply to nonpublic entities only. Unlike US GAAP, the requirements of IFRS 13 apply to all entities, regardless of their public status. Content in this book that is specific to nonpublic entities is marked with a and is not relevant to users of IFRS Standards. © 2020 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. © 2020 KPMG IFRG Limited, a UK company, limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. Fair value measurement handbook | 3 About the standards | This table summarizes what we believe are the key differences in the measurement and disclosure of fair value between US GAAP and IFRS Standards. US GAAP IFRS Standards section N, Disclosures (after adopting ASU 2018-13) ASU 2018-13 eliminated and modified certain fair value disclosure requirements under Topic 820. The ASU also exempted nonpublic entities from certain disclosure requirements. Consequently, the ASU resulted in further divergence in the fair value disclosure requirements under US GAAP and IFRS Standards. These differences are highlighted throughout section N, Disclosures (after adopting ASU 2018-13), particularly in Question N20, which summarizes the fair value disclosure requirements under the standards. section Q, Application issues: Practical expedient for investments in investment companies There is a practical expedient to measure Unlike US GAAP, there is no practical the fair value of these investments at net expedient for these investments. asset value if certain criteria are met. Effective dates Generally, new standards and interpretations issued by the IASB Board have a single effective date. In contrast, those issued by the FASB usually have at least two effective dates – e.g. one for public business entities and another for all other entities. This may be further nuanced by requiring certain entities (e.g. employee benefit plans that file or furnish their financial statements with the SEC) to follow the effective date requirements for public business entities. This means that the implementation dates of new accounting standards can be spread over two or even three years. Appendix: Effective dates – US GAAP includes a table of effective dates to help you navigate new requirements that are not yet (fully) effective that may affect the commentary in this publication. © 2020 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. © 2020 KPMG IFRG Limited, a UK company, limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. 4 | Fair value measurement handbook About this publication Purpose The purpose of this publication is to assist you in understanding the requirements of, and the differences between, Topic 820 and IFRS 13. Organization of the text Each section of this publication includes a short overview, followed by questions and answers. The questions and answers are numbered in steps of 10 so that future questions and answers can be added without breaking the flow of the commentary. Our commentary is referenced to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification® (or Codification) and to IFRS Standards, where applicable. References to the relevant literature are included in the left-hand margin, with the references to IFRS Standards in square brackets below the US GAAP references. For example, 820‑10‑35‑9 is paragraph 35-9 of ASC Subtopic 820-10; and [IFRS 13.22] is paragraph 22 of IFRS 13. The main text is written in the context of US GAAP. To the extent that the requirements of IFRS Standards are the same, the references in the left-hand margin include US GAAP and IFRS Standards. However, if the requirements of IFRS Standards are different from US GAAP, or a different wording might result in different interpretations in practice, a box at the end of that answer discusses the requirements of IFRS Standards and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IFRS in Your Pocket 2019.Pdf
    IFRS in your pocket 2019 Contents Abbreviations 1 Foreword 2 Our IAS Plus website 3 IFRS Standards around the world 5 The IFRS Foundation and the IASB 7 Standards and Interpretations 15 Standards and Interpretations 24 Summaries of Standards and Interpretations in effect at 1 January 2019 29 Requirements that are not yet mandatory 100 IASB projects 104 Deloitte IFRS resources 111 Contacts 113 IFRS in your pocket |2019 Abbreviations ARC Accounting Regulatory Commission ASAF Accounting Standards Advisory Forum DP Discussion Paper EC European Commission ED Exposure Draft EFRAG European Financial Reporting Advisory Group GAAP Generally Accepted Accounting Principles IAS International Accounting Standard IASB International Accounting Standards Board IASC International Accounting Standards Committee (predecessor to the IASB) IFRIC Interpretation issued by the IFRS Interpretations Committee IFRS International Financial Reporting Standard IFRS Standards All Standards and Interpretations issued by the IASB (i.e. the set comprising every IFRS, IAS, IFRIC and SIC) PIR Post-implementation Review SEC US Securities and Exchange Commission SIC Interpretation issued by the Standing Interpretations Committee of the IASC SMEs Small and Medium-sized Entities XBRL Extensible Business Reporting Language XML Extensible Markup Language 1 IFRS in your pocket |2019 Foreword Welcome to the 2019 edition of IFRS in Your Pocket. It is a concise guide of the IASB’s standard-setting activities that has made this publication an annual, and indispensable, worldwide favourite. At its core is a comprehensive summary of the current Standards and Interpretations along with details of the projects on the IASB work plan. Backing this up is information about the IASB and an analysis of the use of IFRS Standards around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Feedback Statement Amends IFRS 7.Indd
    October 2010 Project Summary and Feedback Statement Transfers of Financial Assets Amendments to IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures At a Glance We, the International Accounting The amendments will also make it Standards Board (IASB), amended easier to assess whether an entity has IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures undertaken transactions to achieve a in October 2010 by issuing Transfers of particular accounting result close to Financial Assets. the end of a fi nancial period—so-called The objective of the amendments is to ‘window dressing’. improve the quality of the information IFRS 7 does not prevent entities from reported about: disclosing the type of information • fi nancial assets that have been these amendments will require. But ‘transferred’ but are still, at least it is clear that users of fi nancial partially, recognised by the entity statements, and other interested because they do not qualify for parties, think the quality of disclosures derecognition; and has not been adequate. These amendments address those concerns. • fi nancial assets that are no longer recognised by an entity, because they qualify for derecognition, but with which the entity continues to have some involvement. 2 | TransfersTransfers of Financial AssetsAssets Background These amendments to IFRS 7 are designed to improve The amendments also result in a closer alignment Unfortunately, the global fi nancial crisis forced the the transparency of off balance sheet securitisations of IFRSs and US generally accepted accounting two boards to take separate strategies to improve our and similar transfer transactions. principles (GAAP) disclosure requirements for respective requirements. transferred fi nancial assets. We are responding to requests from users of fi nancial In March 2009 we published an exposure draft statements, regulators—including the Financial We have been considering the derecognition proposing improvements to the derecognition Stability Board—and others.
    [Show full text]
  • IFRS 9, Financial Instruments Understanding the Basics Introduction
    www.pwc.com/ifrs9 IFRS 9, Financial Instruments Understanding the basics Introduction Revenue isn’t the only new IFRS to worry about for 2018—there is IFRS 9, Financial Instruments, to consider as well. Contrary to widespread belief, IFRS 9 affects more than just financial institutions. Any entity could have significant changes to its financial reporting as the result of this standard. That is certain to be the case for those with long-term loans, equity investments, or any non- vanilla financial assets. It might even be the case for those only holding short- term receivables. It all depends. Possible consequences of IFRS 9 include: • More income statement volatility. IFRS 9 raises the risk that more assets will have to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in profit and loss as they arise. • Earlier recognition of impairment losses on receivables and loans, including trade receivables. Entities will have to start providing for possible future credit losses in the very first reporting period a loan goes on the books – even if it is highly likely that the asset will be fully collectible. • Significant new disclosure requirements—the more significantly impacted may need new systems and processes to collect the necessary data. IFRS 9 also includes significant new hedging requirements, which we address in a separate publication – Practical guide – General hedge accounting. With careful planning, the changes that IFRS 9 introduces might provide a great opportunity for balance sheet optimization, or enhanced efficiency of the reporting process and cost savings. Left too long, they could lead to some nasty surprises.
    [Show full text]
  • AC501 (M) MAY 20131 IDE AC501 (M) MAY 2013 Page 1 Of8 UNIVERSITY of SWAZILAND DEP ARTMENT of ACCOUNTING MAIN EXAMINATION PAPER, MAY 2013
    AC501 (M) MAY 20131 IDE AC501 (M) MAY 2013 Page 1 of8 UNIVERSITY OF SWAZILAND DEP ARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING MAIN EXAMINATION PAPER, MAY 2013 DEGREEI DIPLOMA AND YEAR OF STUDY RCOMV TITLE OF PAPER FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 1V COURSE CODE AC501 (M) MAY 2013 (Full-time) IDE AC501 (M) MAY 2013 (PART-TIME) TIME ALLOWED THREE (3) HOURS TOTAL MARKS 100 MARKS INSTRUCTIONS 1 There are four (4) questions on this paper. 2 Answer all four (4) questions. 2 Begin the solution to each question on a new page. 3 The marks awarded for a question are indicated at the end ofeach question. 4 Show the necessary working. 5 Calculations are to be made to zero decimal places of accuracy, unless otherwise instructed. Note: You are reminded that in assessing your work, account will be taken of accuracy of the language and general quality of expression, together with layout and presentation of your answer. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: CALCULATOR THIS PAPER IS NOT TO BE OPENED UNTIL PERMISSION HAS BEEN GRANTED BY THE INVIGILATOR OR SUPERVISOR. AC501 (M) MAY 20131 IDE AC501 (M) MAY 2013 Page 2 ofS QUESTION 1 . The Statement of financial position of Anstone Co, Yals Co and Zoo Co at 31 March 2012 are summarized as follows . • "L...""' .....,,··~.·cO : Non current assets Freehold property , Plant and machin~ry . 310,000 3,000 . Investment in subsidiaries Shares, at cost 110,000 6,~00 Loan account 3!f.iO() . Current accounts 10,000 12,200 120,000 22,200 Current assets Inventories 170,000 , .. , 15,()()() . Receivables 140,000 50,000 1,000 Cash at bank 60,000 4,000 370,000 20,000 800,000 289,200 23,000 Equity and liabilities EClui~y Ordinary share capital 200,000 10,000 Retained earnings 129,200 -1,000 579,600 229,200 ' .
    [Show full text]
  • Earnings Per Share. the Two-Class Method Is an Earnings Allocation
    Earnings Per Share. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for common stock and participating securities, according to dividends declared and participation rights in undistributed earnings. Under this method, net earnings is reduced by the amount of dividends declared in the current period for common shareholders and participating security holders. The remaining earnings or “undistributed earnings” are allocated between common stock and participating securities to the extent that each security may share in earnings as if all of the earnings for the period had been distributed. Once calculated, the earnings per common share is computed by dividing the net (loss) earnings attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each year presented. Diluted (loss) earnings attributable to common shareholders per common share has been computed by dividing the net (loss) earnings attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the dilutive effect of options and restricted shares outstanding during the applicable periods computed using the treasury method. In cases where the Company has a net loss, no dilutive effect is shown as options and restricted stock become anti-dilutive. Fair Value of Financial Instruments. Disclosure of fair values is required for most on- and off-balance sheet financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value. This disclosure requirement excludes certain financial instruments, such as trade receivables and payables when the carrying value approximates the fair value, employee benefit obligations, lease contracts, and all nonfinancial instruments, such as land, buildings, and equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing Complexity in IAS 39
    technical update extra FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS Reducing complexity in IAS 39 MARTIN O’DONOVAN ANALYSES THE PROPOSALS ON REDUCING COMPLEXITY IN FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS. ll will agree that IAS 39, the accounting standard for financial instruments, is complex, but finding an alternative Executive summary is no easy matter. After years of acknowledging that I The International Accounting Standards Board has started the something must be done the International Accounting formal process of considering the possibilities for reducing AStandards Board (IASB) has issued a discussion paper considering complexity in IAS 39. Its discussion paper sets out thoughts on ways to reduce complexity in the reporting of financial instruments. the way financial instruments are measured and some ideas for The paper deliberately restricts itself to the problems arising from the simplifying hedge accounting. However, behind the openness to many ways by which financial instruments are measured as well as change, the board remains firmly wedded to the long-term aim hedge accounting. Derecognition and presentation and disclosures of extending the application of fair values. are not within its scope. Given that the IASB is very much in favour of full fair-value accounting, it starts from the assumption that fair value would be a good measurement attribute that in the long term should apply to all If the accounts are to be meaningful, surely it is important for the financial assets and liabilities. Certainly, when you consider the range user to understand whether the intention of management is to be a of valuation and measurement methods that currently exists, some trader seeking short-term profits or a longer-term holder, generating form of rationalisation is desirable.
    [Show full text]
  • Frs139-Guide.Pdf
    The KPMG Guide: FRS 139, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement i Contents Introduction 1 Executive summary 2 1. Scope of FRS 139 1.1 Financial instruments outside the scope of FRS 139 3 1.2 Definitions 3 2. Classifications and their accounting treatments 2.1 Designation on initial recognition and subsequently 5 2.2 Accounting treatments applicable to each class 5 2.3 Financial instruments at “fair value through profit or loss” 5 2.4 “Held to maturity” investments 6 2.5 “Loans and receivables” 7 2.6 “Available for sale” 8 3. Other recognition and measurement issues 3.1 Initial recognition 9 3.2 Fair value 9 3.3 Impairment of financial assets 10 4. Derecognition 4.1 Derecognition of financial assets 11 4.2 Transfer of a financial asset 11 4.3 Evaluation of risks and rewards 12 4.4 Derecognition of financial liabilities 13 5. Embedded derivatives 5.1 When to separate embedded derivatives from host contracts 14 5.2 Foreign currency embedded derivatives 15 5.3 Accounting for separable embedded derivatives 16 5.4 Accounting for more than one embedded derivative 16 6. Hedge accounting 17 7. Transitional provisions 19 8. Action to be taken in the first year of adoption 20 Appendices 1: Accounting treatment required for financial instruments under their required or chosen classification 21 2: Derecognition of a financial asset 24 3: Financial Reporting Standards and accounting pronouncements 25 1 The KPMG Guide: FRS 139, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement Introduction This KPMG Guide introduces the requirements of the new FRS 139, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement.
    [Show full text]
  • Securities and Exchange Commission Form S
    11/1/11 1:53 PM S-1/A 1 a2205238zs-1a.htm S-1/A Use these links to rapidly review the document TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Table of Contents As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 1, 2011 Registration No. 333-174661 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Amendment No. 7 to FORM S-1 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 Groupon, Inc. (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 7379 27-0903295 (State or other jurisdiction of (Primary Standard Industrial (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Classification Code Number) Identification Number) 600 West Chicago Avenue, Suite 620 Chicago, Illinois 60654 312-676-5773 (Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of Registrant's principal executive offices) Andrew D. Mason Chief Executive Officer Groupon, Inc. 600 West Chicago Avenue, Suite 620 Chicago, Illinois 60654 312-676-5773 (Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service) Copies to: Steven J. Gavin, Esq. David R. Schellhase, Esq. Peter M. Astiz, Esq. Matthew F. Bergmann, Esq. General Counsel Gregory M. Gallo, Esq. Winston & Strawn LLP Groupon, Inc. Jason C. Harmon, Esq. 35 West Wacker Drive 600 West Chicago Avenue, Suite 620 DLA Piper LLP (US) Chicago, Illinois 60601 Chicago, Illinois 60654 2000 University Avenue 312-558-5600 312-676-5773 East Palo Alto, California 94303 650-833-2036 http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1490281/000104746911008854/a2205238zs-1a.htm Page 1 of 401 11/1/11 1:53 PM Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement becomes effective.
    [Show full text]
  • IFRS 7 IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures Is Issued by The
    IFRS 7 IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures is issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (the Board). IFRS Standards together with their accompanying documents are issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (the “Board”). Disclaimer: To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Board and the IFRS Foundation (Foundation) expressly disclaim all liability howsoever arising from this publication or any translation thereof whether in contract, tort or otherwise (including, but not limited to, liability for any negligent act or omission) to any person in respect of any claims or losses of any nature including direct, indirect, incidental or consequential loss, punitive damages, penalties or costs. Information contained in this publication does not constitute advice and should not be substituted for the services of an appropriately qualified professional. Copyright © IFRS Foundation All rights reserved. Reproduction and use rights are strictly limited. Contact the Foundation for further details at [email protected]. Copies of IASB publications may be obtained from the Foundation’s Publications Department. Please address publication and copyright matters to: IFRS Foundation Publications Department 30 Cannon Street, London, EC4M 6XH, United Kingdom. Tel: +44 (0)20 7332 2730 Fax: +44 (0)20 7332 2749 Email: [email protected] Web: www.ifrs.org The IFRS Foundation logo, the IASB logo, the IFRS for SMEs logo, the “Hexagon Device”, “IFRS Foundation”, “eIFRS”, “IAS”, “IASB”, “IFRS for SMEs”, “IASs”, “IFRS”, “IFRSs”, “International Accounting Standards” and “International Financial Reporting Standards”, “IFRIC” and “IFRS Taxonomy” are Trade Marks of the IFRS Foundation. © IFRS Foundation 1 Approval by the Board of IFRS 7 issued in August 2005 International Financial Reporting Standard 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures was approved for issue by the fourteen members of the International Accounting Standards Board.
    [Show full text]
  • When Available, the Fair Value of Securities Is Based on Quoted Prices in Active Markets
    Investments (Trading Securities and Available-for-Sale Securities) When available, the fair value of securities is based on quoted prices in active markets. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are obtained from nationally-recognized pricing services, broker quotes, or other model-based valuation techniques. Level 1 securities include U.S. Treasuries and seed money in funds traded in active markets. Level 2 securities primarily include agency mortgage backed securities, commercial mortgage backed securities, asset backed securities, municipal and corporate bonds, U.S. and foreign government and agency securities, and seed money and other investments in certain hedge funds. The fair value of these Level 2 securities is based on a market approach with prices obtained from nationally-recognized pricing services. Observable inputs used to value these securities can include: reported trades, benchmark yields, issuer spreads and broker/dealer quotes. Level 3 securities primarily include non-agency residential mortgage backed securities, asset backed securities and corporate bonds. The fair value of these Level 3 securities is typically based on a single broker quote, except for the valuation of non-agency residential mortgage backed securities. Effective March 31, 2010, the Company returned to using prices from nationally-recognized pricing services to determine the fair value of non-agency residential mortgage backed securities because the difference between these prices and the results of the Company’s discounted cash flows was not significant. The Company continues to classify its non-agency residential mortgage backed securities as Level 3 because it believes the market for these securities is still inactive and their valuation includes significant unobservable inputs.
    [Show full text]
  • 124 IFRS and XBRL
    International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Online ISSN: 2349-4182, Print ISSN: 2349-5979, Impact Factor: RJIF 5.72 www.allsubjectjournal.com Volume 4; Issue 6; May 2017; Page No. 124-126 IFRS and XBRL: Future of emerging business languages Gauri, Mohammad Shamim Ahmad Ansari, Neha Kashyap Research Scholar, Department of Commerce, Delhi School of Economics, Delhi University, Delhi, India Abstract IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) is a set of accounting standards developed by an independent, not-for-profit organization called the International Accounting Standard Board (IASB). The goal of IFRS is to provide a global framework for how public companies prepare disclose their financial statements. IFRS provides general guidance for the preparation of financial statements, rather than setting rules for industry specific reporting. XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) is an XML- based computer software language that is developed specifically for the automation of business information requirements, such as the preparation, sharing and analysis of financial reports, statements, and audit schedules. XBRL is royalty-free, open specification for software being developed by a non-profit consortium consisting of over 170 leading companies, associates, and government agencies around the world. In this study we have discussed about IFRS and XBRL and their advantages, disadvantages, impacts and the future of IFRS and XBRL. Keywords: XBRL, XML, IFRS, IAS, IASB, IASC Introduction tags, and it organizes the tags so that they have a meaningful International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) is used as structure. Taxonomy enables a computer with XBRL Software the basis for producing financial statements in more than 100 to: Countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Juliana Lagreste Zucchini Legajo: 22.130
    Escuela de Administración y Negocios Trabajo de Licenciatura en Administración de Empresas y Contador Público LAS NORMAS CONTABLES ACTUALES Y LAS EMPRESAS DE E-COMMERCE. EL CASO DE GROUPON. Juliana Lagreste Zucchini Legajo: 22.130 Mentora: Cristina Wirth Victoria, 29 de Mayo de 2014 Resumen El presente trabajo de investigación busca responder la siguiente pregunta: “¿En qué medida las empresas de e-commerce, puntualmente en este caso Groupon, requieren un marco normativo contable diferente a los marcos actuales?” Para poder responder este interrogante se han analizado los Estados Contables presentados bajo el marco normativo U.S. GAAP de la empresa Groupon Inc. Esta es una empresa de e-commerce, caracterizada por conectar comerciantes con clientes a través de un portal web al ofrecer cupones con grandes descuentos que pueden ser intercambiados por productos o servicios. Se llevó a cabo un estudio descriptivo basado en el modelo de negocios de esta compañía y en las métricas financieras y operativas utilizadas. Asimismo, se realizó una comparación de estos criterios con las U.S. GAAP colocando el foco en los principales rubros conflictivos como son las ventas y los gastos de online marketing. Se encontraron diferencias de criterio entre lo que Groupon propone y lo que el organismo regulador, la U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission exige. Groupon es un negocio nuevo y revolucionario que no solo pretende innovar en el modelo de negocios si no también en los criterios contables. De acuerdo con la U.S. SEC los criterios propuestos por Groupon distorsionan la realidad económica de la compañía evitando que la misma sea comparable con otras.
    [Show full text]