Albany Division Timetable No

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Albany Division Timetable No ALBANY DIVISION TIMETABLE NO. 4 EFFECTIVE MONDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 2004 AT 0001 HOURS CSX STANDARD TIME J.C. Decker Division Manager TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL INFORMATION DIVISION SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS DESCRIPTION PAGE INST DESCRIPTION PAGE Table of Contents i. INSTRUCTIONS – OPERATING RULES Timetable Legend ii. GR-105A-1 General Bulletin references 111 Legend – Sample Subdivision iii. 41-1 Speed Restrictions – Control Point 111 Division Officers iv. 46-1 Speed on non-signaled sidings 111 Train Dispatchers v. 49-1 Excepted Tracks 111 Emergency Telephone Numbers vi. 72-1 Flagman – Operating Instructions 111 91.1 Passenger Trains Operation 112 SUBDIVISIONS 103-D-1 Securing Trains 112 104-B-1 Semi-Automatic Switches 112 NAME CODE DISP PAGE 224-1 Next Governing Signal 112 228-1 Signal Aspects - Switch Indicators 112 Baldwinsville BI NE 1 228-2 Signal Aspects – Used in Non ABS 112 Belt BE NG 3 350-1 LSL – Northeast Corridor 113 Berkshire BK NB 5 351-1 Cab Signals – Testing 113 Boston BO NA 11 351-2 Cab Signal and LSL Test Form 113 Buffalo Terminal B1 NG 19 405-1 Radio – Obtaining/Returning Portable 113 Carman CM NC 23 410-1 Radio – Monitor While Deadheading 113 Castleton C9 NJ 25 411-1 Radio – Positive Identification 113 Fair Grounds FG ND 27 411-2 Radio – Emergency Channel Use 113 Fall River FV NA 29 Glossary Running Tracks 114 Fitchburg FI NA 31 Framingham FH NA 33 INSTRUCTIONS - ABTH Fulton FU NE 35 5700-1 1% Heavy Grades – Two Way Telemetry 114 Hudson HN NC 37 5700-2 Other Grades – Two-Way Telemetry 114 Lake Shore L1 NH 43 Lockport LP NG 49 INSTRUCTIONS – EQHR Middleboro MB NA 51 4473-1 Caboose-Shoving Platform Placement 114 Mohawk MW ND 55 Montreal M2 NE 63 EQUIPMENT RESTRICTIONS New Bedford NB NA 69 ER-1 Road Freight – Yard Switching Movement 114 Niagara NG NG 71 ER-2 Six-Axle Engone Restrictions 114 Port P2 NJ 77 ER-3 Engine Awnings – Portable Bay Windows 114 Post Road PR NB 79 ER-4 Engine Awnings – UP Engines 114 River RI NJ 81 ER-5 Engine – AMTRAK Side Mirrors 114 Rochester RC NF 87 Schodack S1 NC 95 INSTRUCTIONS – SAFETY RULES Selkirk SK NC 97 2001-1 Job Briefing – Lite Engine Crews 114 Somerset RR SM NG 101 2101-1 Getting Off Moving Equipment – Exception 114 St. Lawrence S7 NE 103 2105-C-1 Riding on Gondolas or Flat Cars 114 West Shore WE NF 109 INSTRUCTIONS - MISCELLANEOUS M-1 Massachusetts – Engine Idling Policy 114 CSX Transportation Effective November 1, 2004 Albany Division Timetable No. 4 TABLE of CONTENTS © Copyright 2004 TIMETABLE LEGEND GENERAL F. AUTH FOR MOVE (AUTHORITY FOR MOVEMENT) Unless otherwise indicated on subdivision pages, the The authority for movement rules applicable to the track Train Dispatcher controls all Main Tracks, Sidings, segment of the subdivision. Interlockings, Controlled Points and Yard Limits. G. NOTES STATION LISTING AND DIAGRAM PAGES Where station page information may need to be further defined, a note will refer to “STATION PAGE NOTES” 1– HEADING listed at the end of the diagram. The subdivision is identified by name and by 2 letter 3 – SYMBOLS USED IN THE DIAGRAM identifier N – North, S – South, E – East, W – West; 2 – COLUMN HEADINGS AND LISTINGS NB – Northbound, SB – Southbound, EB – Eastbound, WB – Westbound A. AUTHORIZED SPEED Mile post used for checking speed indicator The maximum speed permitted between mileposts listed. accuracy will be shown without alpha prefixes 28.0 This may also include restrictions over road crossings or and will be bordered like this: 29.0 other defined locations. Where speeds differ between various classes of trains, they will be listed in separate (P) Passenger Station columns. CP Controlled Point (X) Interlocking Abbreviations used are (P) – Passenger, (F) – Freight. (R) Remotely Controlled Designations for other trains will be identified in RT Running Track Subdivision Special Instructions. Where speeds differ in IT Industrial Track multiple track territory, the speeds for individual tracks ss Spring Switch will be listed. Special speeds, such as city ordinances, (A) Automatic will be shown in shaded blocks. ABS Automatic Block Signal Rules CPS Control Point Signal Rules B. MILE POST TTB Through Truss Bridge CSS Cab Signal System Rules The alpha-numeric mile post for the station or reference ATC Automatic Train Control Rules point. At locations to check speed indicators the EQHR Equipment Handling Rules mileposts will be listed without alpha prefixes and will be SDF Slide Detector Fence shown with a wide border. SDS Slide Detector Signal SDG Siding C. STATION SSDG Signaled Siding CSDG Controlled Siding The Controlled Point, Interlocking, Station or other ABTH Air Brake Train Handling Rules reference point name. The miles between stations listed in bold letters will be shown on the right side of the Communications text boxes show Dispatcher, CM DISP. column and total miles will be shown at end of diagram. Operator, Yardmaster or other station. AAR channel, call-in tone and where used, the number 94 – 7 RD – 08 D. TRACK DIAGRAM of “clicks” to call the station. If there is a separate road channel, it will be shown as “RD –“ The timetable assigned direction from the first listing to the last is defined above the track diagram by arrows and Defect Detectors direction. (1) Type 1 (Equipment Handling Rules) (2) Type 2 (Equipment Handling Rules) E. TWC – Track Warrant Control Rules AD Audible Detector DED Dragging Equipment Detector TWC-DTC – Listing of TWC-DTC blocks for permanent DEDAC Dragging Equipment Detector, Axle Counter or temporary use. HBD Hot Box Detector HCD High Car Detector TWC-DCS – Listing TWC-DCS stations with the letter ‘D’ HCDAD High Car Detector, Axle Counter for permanent or temporary use as dispatching points. HWD Hot Wheel Detector PDD Protruding Door Detector SWD Sliding Wheel Detector WID Wheel Impact Detector CSX Transportation Effective November 1, 2004 Albany Division Timetable No. 4 © Copyright 2004 LEGEND - SAMPLE SUBDIVISION - SS AUTH AUTHORIZED MILE TRACK DIAGRAM STATION FOR TWC NOTES SPEED POST WEST MOVE TERM DISP. PBR RWY CH – 46 45 14.3 CP BELLWOOD (X) 1 2 TWC-DCS SPARROW SD RD – 46 261 D P F CPQ 0.0 Above the double line is a CR DISP. ABS-261 DTC BLOCK connecting RR or SD, showing 86 – 5 PHIL 60 50 speed, mile posts, stations, track RD – 08 numbers, rules to authorize 1 2 D indicates a DCS movement and other information. Station where TWC- CPQ 9.2 Text boxes for Disp. Rd DCS Rules are in 13.8 or Yd Communications. Speed effect. Change MP. 79 55 Miles between stations. ABS-261 DTC BLOCK PHIL CPQ 13.8 NORTH EAST CPS-261 Speed Indicator ABS-261 This shaded and bordered Thin lines represent non- check. box represents the limits of controlled tracks. a Controlled Point or Interlocking 6.2 BUFORD I.T. DTC BLOCK FORD 17.0 18.0 ABS-261 CPQ 20.0 EAST KENT CPS-261 79 Crossover or switch CPQ 20.3 65 SSDG speed lower than DTC BLOCK 2.0 signal speed. ABS-261 10,120 FT. KENT CPQ 22.0 WEST KENT X10 CPS-261 These lines are non-controlled ABS-261 65 55 track. Yard channel for yarding CPQ 22.8 55 50 instructions shown in a text box . KENT YD 2.4 CH – 28 Controlled Siding shown with Reference to Equipment bold lines at controlled points, Handling Rule (handling thin lines for the non-signaled track between CPS. 55 50 cars prone to rocking). 79 55 ABS-261 CPQ 24.4 EAST LAUREL CPS-261 24.8 ABS-261 EQHR 4453 CSDG DTC BLOCK 1.7 8,750 FT. LAUREL 25.6 DTC Blocks listed with CPQ 26.1 WEST LAUREL Defect detector. lines to show the change points in blocks. CPQ 26.5 LAUREL (1) HBD-DED 2.1 ABS-261 CPQ 28.2 MOHAWK JUNCTION CPS-261 DTC BLOCK C&A RR ABS-261 HAWK 79 55 CPQ 29.2 Connecting RR shown 2.4 C&A RR with dashed lines. 1 60 50 CPQ 29.8 Total miles on a sub- 70 55 division are shown on the CPQ 30.6 ALEXANDRIA 1 2 bottom of the diagram. Notes are explained on the Station Page Notes sec tion. DTC BLOCK 108.6 MILES HAWK CSX Transportation Effective November 1, 2004 Albany Division Timetable No. 4 © Copyright 2004 NORTH REGION T. J. Tuchek Vice President Command Center 1700 W. 167th Street Calumet City, IL 60409 ALBANY DIVISION OFFICERS One Bell Crossing Road Selkirk, NY 12158 J. C. Decker Division Manager K. M. O’Toole J. V. Distefano M. B. Cross Assistant Division Manager Superintendent Line of Road Senior Road Foreman of Engines Manager Safety & Operating Practices D. J. Spatafore D. J. Broadbent W. C. Emerson D. J. Dunlavey Division Engineer Mechanical Superintendent Division Signal Engineer Manager Conductor Training Location and Names Title Location and Names Title Buffalo, NY Selkirk, NY – Train Dispatcher Office L. D. Dellinger Terminal Superintendent R. A. Durden Director Train Operations R. A. Saladino Chief Train Dispatcher Buffalo, NY (Frontier Yard) T. A. Lewandowski Assistant Terminal Superintendent Selkirk, NY (Selkirk Yard) D. A. Vile Trainmaster W. M. Keough Terminal Superintendent T. J. Ferris V Trainmaster R. F. Knaack Assistant Terminal Superintendent J. P. Connelly III Trainmaster C. E. Moriarity Trainmaster T. J. Ferris Trainmaster J. M. Brady Trainmaster R. R. Taylor Jr Trainmaster T. J. Cook Trainmaster R. J. Husted Road Foreman J. W. Sutton Trainmaster J. D. Ochtyun Road Foreman J. M. Monette Trainmaster R. D. Wilson Road Foreman R. F. Mooney Road Foreman D. Puckett Road Foreman Niagara Falls, NY M.
Recommended publications
  • Master HSIPR Selection Sheet 030413 Updates.Xlsx
    FRA High‐Speed Intercity Passenger Rail (HSIPR) Program Updated 3/4/2013 Funding Selection Summary (Sorted by State Abbreviation, Funding Source, and Project Type) Funding Potential Estimated State Project Type Project Name Project Summary Source Funding* Alabama ‐ Total Funding Amount: $200,000 AL FY 2009 Planning Project New Passenger Rail Service in Alabama Completion of a feasibility study to restore intercity passenger rail service from Birmingham to Montgomery to Mobile, AL.$ 200,000 Amtrak ‐ Total Funding Amount: $449,944,000 This project will boost capacity, reliability, and speed in one of the most heavily used sections of the Northeast Corridor (NEC). The project will create a 24 mile segment of track between New Brunswick and Trenton, NJ capable of 160 mph train operations with high‐tension catenary, upgraded electric Amtrak ARRA Corridor Program NEC Power, Signal, Track, Catenary Improvements power facilities, and high‐speed rail interlockings that allow express trains to overtake and pass local trains, reducing delays that often affect this track $ 449,944,000 section. In addition, this project makes related track and interlocking investments between Trenton, NJ and Morrisville, PA and at New York Penn Station. The upgraded power facilities will reduce power failures, which are frequently experienced on this segment of the NEC. California ‐ Total Funding Amount: $4,243,143,231 This project encompasses the purchase of 15 passenger rail cars and 4 locomotives for use on the Pacific Surfliner, San Joaquin, and Capitol Corridors in California. These new cars and locomotives will be compliant with standards for equipment that can travel at speeds up to 125 mph established Next Generation Passenger Rail Equipment CA ‐ DOT ARRA Corridor Program pursuant to Section 305 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • 216 Part 218—Railroad Operating Practices
    Pt. 217, App. A 49 CFR Ch. II (10–1–12 Edition) APPENDIX A TO PART 217—SCHEDULE OF CIVIL PENALTIES 1 Willful viola- Section Violation tion 217.7 Operating rules: (a) ............................................................................................................................................ $2,500 $5,000 (b) ............................................................................................................................................ $2,000 $5,000 (c) ............................................................................................................................................ $2,500 $5,000 217.9 Operational tests and inspections: (a) Failure to implement a program ........................................................................................ $9,500– $13,000– 12,500 16,000 (b) Railroad and railroad testing officer responsibilities:. (1) Failure to provide instruction, examination, or field training, or failure to con- duct tests in accordance with program ................................................................. 9,500 13,000 (2) Records ............................................................................................................... 7,500 11,000 (c) Record of program; program incomplete .......................................................................... 7,500– 11,000– 12,500 16,000 (d) Records of individual tests and inspections ...................................................................... 7,500 (e) Failure to retain copy of or conduct:. (1)(i) Quarterly
    [Show full text]
  • Zoning By-Laws
    ZONING BY-LAWS Town of WAREHAM Massachusetts Revised October , 2018 This page intentionally left blank 1 Town of WAREHAM Massachusetts TABLE OF CONTENTS Article 1: General Provisions 5 110 Title 5 120 Authority 5 130 Purpose 5 140 Applicability 5 150 Severability 5 Article 2: Zoning Districts 6 210 Classification of Districts 6 220 Zoning Map 7 230 Lots in Two Districts 8 Article 3: Use Regulations 9 310 Use Regulations 9 320 Table of Principal Use Regulations 9 330 Table of Accessory Use Regulations 13 340 Use Definitions 14 350 Multiple Principal Uses and Structures 20 360 Applicable Uses 20 370 Uses Prohibited in All Districts 20 380 Special Conditions Applicable to Uses in Certain Districts 21 390 Marijuana Facilities 22 Article 4: Overlay Districts 23 410 Overlay Districts Generally 23 420 Flood Plain District 23 430 Buttermilk Bay Overlay District 25 440 Groundwater Protection Overlay District 25 450 Business Development Overlay District 28 460 Tremont Nail Factory Redevelopment Overlay District 30 Article 5: Supplemental Regulations 32 510 Home Occupations 32 520 Temporary Habitation 32 530 Ungaraged Motor Vehicle 32 540 Wireless Communications Facilities 32 550 Adult Use Regulations 34 560 Earth Removal Activities 36 570 Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) 36 2 580 Special Permit for large tracts in the Conference Recreational District 41 590 Solar Energy Generation Facilities 45 Article 6: Density and Dimensional Regulations 50 610 General Requirements 50 620 Table of Dimensional Regulations 50 Article 7: Design Standards and
    [Show full text]
  • No Action Alternative Report
    No Action Alternative Report April 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2. NEC FUTURE Background ............................................................................................................................ 2 3. Approach to No Action Alternative.............................................................................................................. 4 3.1 METHODOLOGY FOR SELECTING NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE PROJECTS .................................................................................... 4 3.2 DISINVESTMENT SCENARIO ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 4. No Action Alternative ................................................................................................................................... 6 4.1 TRAIN SERVICE ........................................................................................................................................................................ 6 4.2 NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE RAIL PROJECTS ............................................................................................................................... 9 4.2.1 Funded Projects or Projects with Approved Funding Plans (Category 1) ............................................................. 9 4.2.2 Funded or Unfunded Mandates (Category 2) .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CSX Transportation (CSX) Lynchburg, VA April 30, 2014
    Federal Railroad Administration Office of Railroad Safety Accident and Analysis Branch Accident Investigation Report HQ-2014-4 CSX Transportation (CSX) Lynchburg, VA April 30, 2014 Note that 49 U.S.C. §20903 provides that no part of an accident or incident report, including this one, made by the Secretary of Transportation/Federal Railroad Administration under 49 U.S.C. §20902 may be used in a civil action for damages resulting from a matter mentioned in the report. U.S. Department of Transportation FRA File #HQ-2014-4 Federal Railroad Administration FRA FACTUAL RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT TRAIN SUMMARY 1. Name of Railroad Operating Train #1 1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. CSX Transportation CSX 000129247 GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance 1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. CSX Transportation CSX 000129247 2. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing Identification Number 3. Date of Accident/Incident 4. Time of Accident/Incident 4/30/2014 1:54 PM 5. Type of Accident/Incident Derailment 6. Cars Carrying 7. HAZMAT Cars 8. Cars Releasing 9. People 10. Subdivision HAZMAT 104 Damaged/Derailed 17 HAZMAT 1 Evacuated 400 Huntington East 11. Nearest City/Town 12. Milepost (to nearest tenth) 13. State Abbr. 14. County Lynchburg VA LYNCHBURG 15. Temperature (F) 16. Visibility 17. Weather 18. Type of Track 53 ̊ F Day Rain Main 19. Track Name/Number 20. FRA Track Class 21. Annual Track Density 22. Time Table Direction (gross tons in millions) No. 2 Freight Trains-25, Passenger Trains-30 East 50 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Nurail Project ID: Nurail2012-UTK-R04 Macro Scale
    NURail project ID: NURail2012-UTK-R04 Macro Scale Models for Freight Railroad Terminals By Mingzhou Jin Professor Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering University of Tennessee at Knoxville E-mail: [email protected] David B. Clarke Director of the Center for Transportation Research University of Tennessee at Knoxville E-mail: [email protected] Grant Number: DTRT12-G-UTC18 March 2, 2016 Page 1 of 6 DISCLAIMER Funding for this research was provided by the NURail Center, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign under Grant No. DTRT12-G-UTC18 of the U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research & Technology (OST-R), University Transportation Centers Program. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation’s University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. March 2, 2016 Page 2 of 6 TECHNICAL SUMMARY Title Macro Scale Models for Freight Railroad Terminals Introduction This project has developed a yard capacity model for macro-level analysis. The study considers the detailed sequence and scheduling in classification yards and their impacts on yard capacities simulate typical freight railroad terminals, and statistically analyses of the historical and simulated data regarding dwell-time and traffic flows. Approach and Methodology The team developed optimization models to investigate three sequencing decisions are at the areas inspection, hump, and assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • SRPP Report Shell Ver 3A
    2008 New York State Rail Plan State of New York Working Draft June 2008 New York State Department of Transportation DAVID A. PATERSON, Governor ASTRID C. GLYNN, Commissioner THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY 2008 New York State Rail Plan Working Draft June 2008 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1 CHAPTER 1 – STATE RAIL VISION, GOALS, OBJECTIVES 1 AND STRATEGIES 1.1 Role of Railroads in New York State 1 1.2 Vision of Rail Transportation in New York State 4 1.3 Goals, Objectives and Strategies for Rail Service in New York State 7 CHAPTER 2 – PLAN PURPOSE AND AUTHORITY 15 2.1 Purposes of the State Rail Plan 15 2.2 State and Federal Legislative and Planning Requirements 16 CHAPTER 3 – THE RAIL SYSTEM IN NEW YORK STATE 23 3.1 Overview of New York State’s Rail Network 23 3.2 Summary History of Railroads in New York State 26 3.3 National Rail Industry Developments 26 3.4 Recent Rail System Changes Impacting New York 29 3.5 Rail Freight System Needs 31 CHAPTER 4 – FREIGHT RAIL 35 4.1 The Freight Rail Network in New York State 35 4.2 Freight Activity, Traffic Density, and Service Description 39 4.3 Freight Terminals, Intermodal Facilities, and Major Yards 53 4.4 Rail System Asset Condition: Freight Rail Service 56 4.5 Rail Line Abandonments: Recent, Proposed, and/or At-Risk Lines 59 4.6 Corridor and Freight Planning Efforts 61 4.7 Rail Freight System Issues and Needs 66 CHAPTER 5 – INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL 79 5.1 The Intercity Passenger Rail Network in New York State 79 5.2 Existing Passenger Rail Services, Stations, and Routes 80 5.3 Passenger
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Railroad Administration Office of Safety Headquarters Assigned Accident Investigation Report HQ-2009-08
    Federal Railroad Administration Office of Safety Headquarters Assigned Accident Investigation Report HQ-2009-08 Amtrak (ATK) Russell, MA March 8, 2009 Note that 49 U.S.C. §20903 provides that no part of an accident or incident report made by the Secretary of Transportation/Federal Railroad Administration under 49 U.S.C. §20902 may be used in a civil action for damages resulting from a matter mentioned in the report. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FRA FACTUAL RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT FRA File # HQ-2009-08 FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION 1.Name of Railroad Operating Train #1 1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. Amtrak [ATK ] ATK 111316 2.Name of Railroad Operating Train #2 2a. Alphabetic Code 2b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. N/A N/A N/A 3.Name of Railroad Operating Train #3 3a. Alphabetic Code 3b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. N/A N/A N/A 4.Name of Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance: 4a. Alphabetic Code 4b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. CSX Transportation [CSX ] CSX R00057726 5. U.S. DOT_AAR Grade Crossing Identification Number 6. Date of Accident/Incident 7. Time of Accident/Incident Month 03 Day 08 Year 2009 02:48:00 AM PM 8. Type of Accident/Indicent 1. Derailment 4. Side collision 7. Hwy-rail crossing 10. Explosion-detonation 13. Other Code (single entry in code box) 2. Head on collision 5. Raking collision 8. RR grade crossing 11. Fire/violent rupture (describe in narrative) 3. Rear end collision 6. Broken Train collision 9. Obstruction 12. Other impacts 01 9. Cars Carrying 10. HAZMAT Cars 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Railroad Administration Office of Railroad Safety Accident and Analysis Branch
    Federal Railroad Administration Office of Railroad Safety Accident and Analysis Branch Accident Investigation Report HQ-2013-13 Union Pacific (UP) Chafee, MO May 25, 2013 Note that 49 U.S.C. §20903 provides that no part of an accident or incident report, including this one, made by the Secretary of Transportation/Federal Railroad Administration under 49 U.S.C. §20902 may be used in a civil action for damages resulting from a matter mentioned in the report. U.S. Department of Transportation FRA File #HQ-2013-13 Federal Railroad Administration FRA FACTUAL RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT TRAIN SUMMARY 1. Name of Railroad Operating Train #1 1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. Union Pacific Railroad Company UP 0513SL011 2. Name of Railroad Operating Train #2 2a. Alphabetic Code 2b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. BNSF Railway Company BNSF SF0513118 GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance 1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. Union Pacific Railroad Company UP 0513SL011 2. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing Identification Number 3. Date of Accident/Incident 4. Time of Accident/Incident 5/25/2013 2:35 AM 5. Type of Accident/Incident Side Collision 6. Cars Carrying 7. HAZMAT Cars 8. Cars Releasing 9. People 10. Subdivision HAZMAT Damaged/Derailed HAZMAT Evacuated Chester 11. Nearest City/Town 12. Milepost (to nearest tenth) 13. State Abbr. 14. County Chafee 131.1 MO SCOTT 15. Temperature (F) 16. Visibility 17. Weather 18. Type of Track 50 ̊ F Dark Clear Main 19. Track Name/Number 20. FRA Track Class 21.
    [Show full text]
  • CENTRAL CONNECTICUT METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION 241 Main St, Hartford, CT 06106
    ADOPTED APRIL 21, 2015 CENTRAL CONNECTICUT METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION 241 Main St, Hartford, CT 06106 Disclaimer This report has been prepared by the Central ConnecticutMetropolitan Planning Organizationin cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, including its participating agencies, and the Connecticut Department of Transportation. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the Central Connecticut Metropolitan Planning Organization and do not neces- sarily reflect the official views or policies of the State of Connecticut. 2015 Minor Update 2 of 212 Contents CONTENTS ................................................................................... 3 SYSTEMS .................................................................................. 101 FOREWORD ................................................................................. 4 Pedestrians and cyclists.................................................................. 102 2015 Minor Update ............................................................................ 5 Public transit .................................................................................. 118 VISION ......................................................................................... 7 Private vehicles .............................................................................. 149 National performance oalsg ............................................................... 9 Freight ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study
    BERKSHIRE FLYER: PITTSFIELD TO NEW YORK CITY CITYFEASIBILITY STUDY DEVELOPED IN SUPPORT OF THE BERKSHIRE FLYER WORKING GROUP March 26, 2018 Berkshire Flyer: Pittsfield-New York City Feasibility Study Berkshire Flyer: Pittsfield to New York City Feasibility Study Developed by: MasssDOT Transit & Rail Division In support of: The Berkshire Flyer Working Group Study Support Provided by: STV Inc. HMMH Inc. TPRG 3/26/2018 Berkshire Flyer: Pittsfield-New York City Feasibility Study TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction and Background ................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Study Goals ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Study Development Process ............................................................................................. 2 1.2.1 Berkshire Flyer Working Group ............................................................................... 2 1.2.2 Working Group meetings .......................................................................................... 3 1.3 Potential Passenger Rail Service ...................................................................................... 3 1.3.1 Cape Flyer Rail Service ............................................................................................ 4 1.3.2 Framework for Berkshire Flyer Service ................................................................... 6 1.4 Existing Services .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Operating Plan
    REDACTED - TO BE PLACED ON PUBLIC FILE BEFORE THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD ___________________________ DOCKET NO. FD 36472 ___________________________ CSX CORPORATION AND CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., ET AL. —CONTROL AND MERGER— PAN AM SYSTEMS, INC., PAN AM RAILWAYS, INC., BOSTON AND MAINE CORPORATION, MAINE CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, NORTHERN RAILROAD, PAN AM SOUTHERN LLC, PORTLAND TERMINAL COMPANY, SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY, STONY BROOK RAILROAD COMPANY, AND VERMONT & MASSACHUSETTS RAILROAD COMPANY ___________________________ EXHIBIT 13 ___________________________ Operating Plan Verified by Mr. Jamie Boychuk APP-298 REDACTED - TO BE PLACED ON PUBLIC FILE OPERATING PLAN VERIFIED BY JAMIE BOYCHUK Table of Contents I. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 3 II. Data Sources and Methodologies ....................................................................... 5 A. Traffic Data Sources ...................................................................................... 5 B. Operating Data Sources ................................................................................ 5 C. Methodology ................................................................................................... 5 III. Summary ............................................................................................................. 6 IV. Pre-Transaction Operations ............................................................................. 10 A. Train Operations
    [Show full text]