DOCSLIB.ORG

216 Part 218—Railroad Operating Practices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
216 Part 218—Railroad Operating Practices Pt. 217, App. A 49 CFR Ch. II (10–1–12 Edition) APPENDIX A TO PART 217—SCHEDULE OF CIVIL PENALTIES 1 Willful viola- Section Violation tion 217.7 Operating rules: (a) ............................................................................................................................................ $2,500 $5,000 (b) ............................................................................................................................................ $2,000 $5,000 (c) ............................................................................................................................................ $2,500 $5,000 217.9 Operational tests and inspections: (a) Failure to implement a program ........................................................................................ $9,500– $13,000– 12,500 16,000 (b) Railroad and railroad testing officer responsibilities:. (1) Failure to provide instruction, examination, or field training, or failure to con- duct tests in accordance with program ................................................................. 9,500 13,000 (2) Records ............................................................................................................... 7,500 11,000 (c) Record of program; program incomplete .......................................................................... 7,500– 11,000– 12,500 16,000 (d) Records of individual tests and inspections ...................................................................... 7,500 (e) Failure to retain copy of or conduct:. (1)(i) Quarterly review ............................................................................................... 9,500 13,000 (1)(ii) and (2) Six month review ................................................................................ 9,500 13,000 (3) Records ............................................................................................................... 7,500 11,000 (f) Annual summary ................................................................................................................ 7,500 11,000 (h) Failure to timely or appropriately amend program after disapproval ................................ 9,500– 13,000– 12,500 16,000 217.11 Program of instruction on operating rules: (a) ............................................................................................................................................ $5,000 $7,500 (b) ............................................................................................................................................ $2,500 $5,000 1 A penalty may be assessed against an individual only for a willful violation. The Administrator reserves the right to assess a penalty of up to $105,000 for any violation where circumstances warrant. See 49 CFR part 209, appendix A. [59 FR 43071, Aug. 22, 1994, as amended at 63 FR 11620, Mar. 10, 1998; 69 FR 30593, May 28, 2004; 73 FR 8497, Feb. 13, 2008; 73 FR 79701, Dec. 30, 2008; 77 FR 24420, Apr. 24, 2012] PART 218—RAILROAD OPERATING 218.39 Hump operations. 218.41 Noncompliance with hump operations PRACTICES rule. Subpart A—General Subpart D—Prohibition Against Tampering With Safety Devices Sec. 218.1 Purpose. 218.51 Purpose. 218.3 Application. 218.53 Scope and definitions. 218.4 Preemptive effect. 218.55 Tampering prohibited. 218.5 Definitions. 218.57 Responsibilities of individuals. 218.7 Waivers. 218.59 Responsibilities of railroads. 218.9 Civil penalty. 218.61 Authority to deactivate safety de- 218.11 Filing, testing, and instruction. vices. Subpart B—Blue Signal Protection of Subpart E—Protection of Occupied Camp Workers Cars 218.21 Scope. 218.71 Purpose and scope. 218.22 Utility employee. 218.73 Warning signal display. 218.23 Blue signal display. 218.75 Methods of protection for camp cars. 218.24 One-person crew. 218.77 Remotely controlled switches. 218.25 Workers on a main track. 218.79 Alternative methods of protection. 218.27 Workers on track other than main 218.80 Movement of occupied camp cars. track. 218.29 Alternate methods of protection. Subpart F—Handling Equipment, Switches, 218.30 Remotely controlled switches. and Fixed Derails Subpart C—Protection of Trains and 218.91 Purpose and scope. Locomotives 218.93 Definitions. 218.95 Instruction, training, and examina- 218.31 Scope. tion. 218.35 Yard limits. 218.97 Good faith challenge procedures. 218.37 Flag protection. 218.99 Shoving or pushing movements. 216 VerDate Mar<15>2010 22:01 Dec 09, 2012 Jkt 226220 PO 00000 Frm 00226 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Q:\49\49V4.TXT ofr150 PsN: PC150 Federal Railroad Administration, DOT § 218.5 218.101 Leaving rolling and on-track main- U.S.C. 20106 (section 20106), issuance of tenance-of-way equipment in the clear. the regulations in this part preempts 218.103 Hand-operated switches, including any State law, regulation, or order cov- crossover switches. ering the same subject matter, except 218.105 Additional operational requirements for hand-operated main track switches. an additional or more stringent law, 218.107 Additional operational requirements regulation, or order that is necessary for hand-operated crossover switches. to eliminate or reduce an essentially 218.109 Hand-operated fixed derails. local railroad safety or railroad secu- APPENDIX A TO PART 218—SCHEDULE OF CIVIL rity hazard; that is not incompatible PENALTIES with a law, regulation, or order of the APPENDIX B TO PART 218—STATEMENT OF United States Government; and that AGENCY ENFORCEMENT POLICY ON BLUE does not unreasonably burden inter- SIGNAL PROTECTION FOR UTILITY EMPLOY- state commerce. Section 20106 permits EES State tort actions arising from events APPENDIX C TO PART 218—STATEMENT OF or activities occurring on or after Jan- AGENCY ENFORCEMENT POLICY ON TAM- PERING uary 18, 2002, for the following: Viola- APPENDIX D TO PART 218—REQUIREMENTS AND tion of the Federal standard of care es- CONSIDERATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTING TECH- tablished by regulation or order issued NOLOGY AIDED POINT PROTECTION the Secretary of Transportation (with AUTHORITY: 49 U.S.C. 20103, 20107; 28 U.S.C. respect to railroad safety, such as 2461, note; and 49 CFR 1.49. these regulations) or the Secretary of Homeland Security (with respect to SOURCE: 44 FR 2175, Jan. 10, 1979, unless railroad security); a party’s violation otherwise noted. of, or failure to comply with, its own plan, rule, or standard that it created Subpart A—General pursuant to a regulation or order issued by either of the two Secretaries; § 218.1 Purpose. and a party’s violation of a State This part prescribes minimum re- standard that is necessary to eliminate quirements for railroad operating rules or reduce an essentially local safety or and practices. Each railroad may pre- security hazard, is not incompatible scribe additional or more stringent re- with a law, regulation, or order of the quirements in its operating rules, time- United States Government, and does tables, timetable special instructions, not unreasonably burden interstate and other special instructions. commerce. Nothing in section 20106 creates a Federal cause of action on be- § 218.3 Application. half of an injured party or confers Fed- (a) Except as provided in paragraph eral question jurisdiction for such (b) of this section, this part applies to State law causes of action. railroads that operate rolling equip- [73 FR 8498, Feb. 13, 2008] ment on standard gage track which is part of the general railroad system of § 218.5 Definitions. transportation. Absolute block means a block in which (b) This part does not apply to— no train is permitted to enter while it (1) A railroad that operates only on is occupied by another train. track inside an installation which is Blue signal means a clearly distin- not part of the general railroad system guishable blue flag or blue light by day of transportation, or and a blue light at night. When at- (2) Rapid transit operations in an tached to the operating controls of a urban area that are not connected with locomotive, it need not be lighted if the general railroad system of trans- the inside of the cab area of the loco- portation. motive is sufficiently lighted so as to [44 FR 2175, Jan. 10, 1979, as amended at 53 make the blue signal clearly distin- FR 28599, July 28, 1988] guishable. Camp car means any on-track vehicle, § 218.4 Preemptive effect. including outfit, camp, or bunk cars or Normal State negligence standards modular homes mounted on flat cars apply where there is no Federal action used to house rail employees. It does covering the subject matter. Under 49 not include wreck trains. 217 VerDate Mar<15>2010 22:01 Dec 09, 2012 Jkt 226220 PO 00000 Frm 00227 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Q:\49\49V4.TXT ofr150 PsN: PC150 § 218.5 49 CFR Ch. II (10–1–12 Edition) Car shop repair track area means one is under the exclusive control of me- or more tracks within an area in which chanical department personnel. the testing, servicing, repair, inspec- Main track means a track, other than tion, or rebuilding of railroad rolling an auxiliary track, extending through equipment is under the exclusive con- yards or between stations, upon which trol of mechanical department per- trains are operated by timetable or sonnel. train order or both, or the use of which Controlling locomotive means a loco- is governed by a signal system. motive arranged as having the only Rolling equipment includes loco- controls over all electrical, mechanical motives, railroad cars, and one or more and pneumatic functions for one or locomotives coupled to one or more more locomotives, including controls cars.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Operation of Points
    9100-000-007 Safeworking Rules and Procedures PUBLIC TRANSPORT AUTHORITY SAFEWORKING RULES AND PROCEDURES 9012 OPERATION OF POINTS 9012 Operation of Points Rev1.00 Date: 01 November 15 Page 1 of 18 9100-000-007 Safeworking Rules and Procedures CONTENTS 1. Purpose ................................................................................................................. 3 2. General .................................................................................................................. 3 3. Setting Points ........................................................................................................ 4 3.1. Indications of Points Setting ......................................................................... 4 3.2. Restoration of Points .................................................................................... 4 4. Movement over Points ........................................................................................... 5 4.1. Rail Traffic .................................................................................................... 5 4.2. Competent Workers ..................................................................................... 5 4.3. Trailing Points .............................................................................................. 5 5. Damaged Points .................................................................................................... 6 6. Failed Electrically Operated Points ....................................................................... 6
    [Show full text]
  • the Swindon and Cricklade Railway
    The Swindon and Cricklade Railway Construction of the Permanent Way Document No: S&CR S PW001 Issue 2 Format: Microsoft Office 2010 August 2016 SCR S PW001 Issue 2 Copy 001 Page 1 of 33 Registered charity No: 1067447 Registered in England: Company No. 3479479 Registered office: Blunsdon Station Registered Office: 29, Bath Road, Swindon SN1 4AS 1 Document Status Record Status Date Issue Prepared by Reviewed by Document owner Issue 17 June 2010 1 D.J.Randall D.Herbert Joint PW Manager Issue 01 Aug 2016 2 D.J.Randall D.Herbert / D Grigsby / S Hudson PW Manager 2 Document Distribution List Position Organisation Copy Issued To: Copy No. (yes/no) P-Way Manager S&CR Yes 1 Deputy PW Manager S&CR Yes 2 Chairman S&CR (Trust) Yes 3 H&S Manager S&CR Yes 4 Office Files S&CR Yes 5 3 Change History Version Change Details 1 to 2 Updates throughout since last release SCR S PW001 Issue 2 Copy 001 Page 2 of 33 Registered charity No: 1067447 Registered in England: Company No. 3479479 Registered office: Blunsdon Station Registered Office: 29, Bath Road, Swindon SN1 4AS Table of Contents 1 Document Status Record ....................................................................................................................................... 2 2 Document Distribution List ................................................................................................................................... 2 3 Change History .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • December 2016 Inter City Railway Society Founded 1973
    TTRRAA CCKKSS Inter City Railway Society - December 2016 Inter City Railway Society founded 1973 www.intercityrailwaysociety.org Volume 44 No.12 Issue 528 December 2016 The content of the magazine is the copyright of the Society No part of this magazine may be reproduced without prior permission of the copyright holder President: Simon Mutten (01603 715701) Coppercoin, 12 Blofield Corner Rd, Blofield, Norwich, Norfolk NR13 4RT Chairman: Carl Watson - [email protected] Mob (07403 040533) 14, Partridge Gardens, Waterlooville, Hampshire PO8 9XG Treasurer: Peter Britcliffe - [email protected] (01429 234180) 9 Voltigeur Drive, Hart, Hartlepool TS27 3BS Membership Sec: Colin Pottle - [email protected] (01933 272262) 166 Midland Road, Wellingborough, Northants NN8 1NG Mob (07840 401045) Secretary: Stuart Moore - [email protected] (01603 714735) 64 Blofield Corner Rd, Blofield, Norwich, Norfolk NR13 4SA Magazine: Editor: Trevor Roots - [email protected] (01466 760724) Mill of Botary, Cairnie, Huntly, Aberdeenshire AB54 4UD Mob (07765 337700) Sightings: James Holloway - [email protected] (0121 744 2351) 246 Longmore Road, Shirley, Solihull B90 3ES Photo Database: Colin Pottle Website: Trevor Roots - [email protected] contact details as above Events: Sales Stand: Christine Field Trip Co-ordinator: vacant Books: Publications Manager: Carl Watson - [email protected] Publications Team: Trevor
    [Show full text]
  • Nurail Project ID: Nurail2012-UTK-R04 Macro Scale
    NURail project ID: NURail2012-UTK-R04 Macro Scale Models for Freight Railroad Terminals By Mingzhou Jin Professor Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering University of Tennessee at Knoxville E-mail: [email protected] David B. Clarke Director of the Center for Transportation Research University of Tennessee at Knoxville E-mail: [email protected] Grant Number: DTRT12-G-UTC18 March 2, 2016 Page 1 of 6 DISCLAIMER Funding for this research was provided by the NURail Center, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign under Grant No. DTRT12-G-UTC18 of the U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research & Technology (OST-R), University Transportation Centers Program. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation’s University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. March 2, 2016 Page 2 of 6 TECHNICAL SUMMARY Title Macro Scale Models for Freight Railroad Terminals Introduction This project has developed a yard capacity model for macro-level analysis. The study considers the detailed sequence and scheduling in classification yards and their impacts on yard capacities simulate typical freight railroad terminals, and statistically analyses of the historical and simulated data regarding dwell-time and traffic flows. Approach and Methodology The team developed optimization models to investigate three sequencing decisions are at the areas inspection, hump, and assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bibliography of the History of Inland Waterways, Railways and Road Transport in the British Isles, 2001
    A Bibliography of the History of Inland Waterways, Railways and Road Transport in the British Isles, 2001 This is the seventeenth of these annual bibliographies. annual listing. (Michael Woods is collecting data on Peter Somervail has been one of the regular the ever-growing number of railway-related official contributors from the beginning, submitting details publications.) As regards periodical publications, of historical articles published in Waterways World however, only historical articles are noted; the and of books reviewed there; however, he has now contemporaneous literature is too just too extensive. requested leave to retire. Fortuitously this followed There is also a degree of selection: short items of an offer from Tony Harvey to widen the range of less than a page and articles that are a re-working of waterway periodicals that are systematically searched previously published work are generally omitted. (the first results of this appear below) and to lead the Publication of annual bibliographies was always compilation of the Canal and River Navigations seen as an interim service. As their number increases, section. This is also the last year that John Langford searching through them becomes ever more daunting. is able to provide the main input on Irish publications. Some form of cumulative publication is needed, In thanking these member for their past and future back-dated to cover earlier years. The accumulated support, this is an opportunity to thank also the other data on railway books and pamphlets up to 1995 was regular contributors, several of whom have also been included in Ottley’s Bibliography of British Railway involved since 1985: Alan Jackson, Paul Reynolds, History: second supplement and it is expected that Paul Sowan, Donald Steggles, Richard Storey and there will be a third supplement in due course.
    [Show full text]
  • Collision Between Freight Wagons (For Train 4MP5) and Passenger Train 8622 Moonee Ponds Creek Junction, South Dynon, Victoria
    ATSB TRANSPORT SAFETY INVESTIGATION REPORT Rail Occurrence Investigation 2005001 Final Collision Between Freight Wagons (for train 4MP5) and Passenger Train 8622 Moonee Ponds Creek Junction, South Dynon, Victoria 19 January 2005 ATSB TRANSPORT SAFETY INVESTIGATION REPORT RAIL REPORT 2005/001 Final Collision Between Freight Wagons (for Train 4MP5) and Passenger Train 8622 Moonee Ponds Creek Junction, South Dynon 19 January 2005 Released in accordance with section 25 of the Transport Safety Investigation Act 2003 – ii – Published by: Australian Transport Safety Bureau Postal address: PO Box 967, Civic Square ACT 2608 Office location: 15 Mort Street, Canberra City, Australian Capital Territory Telephone: 1800 621 372; from overseas + 61 2 6274 6590 Accident and serious incident notification: 1800 011 034 (24 hours) Facsimile: 02 6274 6474; from overseas + 61 2 6274 6474 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.atsb.gov.au © Commonwealth of Australia 2006. This work is copyright. In the interests of enhancing the value of the information contained in this publication you may copy, download, display, print, reproduce and distribute this material in unaltered form (retaining this notice). However, copyright in the material obtained from non- Commonwealth agencies, private individuals or organisations, belongs to those agencies, individuals or organisations. Where you want to use their material you will need to contact them directly. Subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968, you must not make any other use of the material in this publication unless you have the permission of the Australian Transport Safety Bureau. Please direct requests for further information or authorisation to: Commonwealth Copyright Administration Copyright Law Branch Attorney-General’s Department Robert Garran Offices National Circuit BARTON ACT 2600 www.ag.gov.au/cca ISBN and formal report title: see ‘Document retrieval information’ on page vi.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation Report 2011-R001 Laois Traincare Depot Derailment 20
    Investigation Report 2011-R001 Laois Traincare Depot Derailment th 20 January 2010 Laois Traincare Depot Derailment Document History Title Laois Traincare Depot Derailment, 20th January 2010 Document type Investigation Report Document number 2011-R001 Document issue date 19th January 2011 Revision Revision Summary of changes number date RAIU ii Investigation Report 2011-R001 Laois Traincare Depot Derailment Function of the Railway Accident Investigation Unit The Railway Accident Investigation Unit (RAIU) is a functionally independent investigation unit within the Railway Safety Commission (RSC). The purpose of an investigation by the RAIU is to improve railway safety by establishing, in so far as possible, the cause or causes of an accident or incident with a view to making recommendations for the avoidance of accidents in the future, or otherwise for the improvement of railway safety. It is not the purpose of an investigation to attribute blame or liability. The RAIU’s investigations are carried out in accordance with the Railway Safety Act 2005 and European railway safety directive 2004/49/EC. Any enquiries about this report should be sent to: RAIU Trident House Blackrock County Dublin Ireland RAIU iii Investigation Report 2011-R001 Laois Traincare Depot Derailment Executive Summary At 15.25 hours on the 20th January 2010 a Class 22000 six carriage train was scheduled to leave Laois Traincare Depot after routine servicing. The intended destination of the train was Heuston Station. The Train Driver performed his pre-departure checks and the Shunter authorised the train to proceed out of Laois Traincare Depot as far as signal PL278, which controls the exit from the depot onto the down loop adjacent to the main line.
    [Show full text]
  • Failure-Free Operation of Classification Yards Through Technology Optimization
    Badania Liudmyla V. Trykoz, Irina V. Bagiyanc Failure-free operation of classifi cation yards through technology optimization The railway operation practice has proved that the condition of The development of new or refurbishment of existing classifi - technical equipment considerably infl uences the processes of traf- cation yards require analysis of the maximum possible number fi c organization and making-up/breaking-up trains. Operational of cars to be sorted in a specifi c time, i.e. a required capacity failures lead to a lower estimated capacity of sorting facilities which takes into account station functions, features connected and, consequently, to a lower carrying capacity of stations and with its location within the rail network and industrial area. The sections. Besides, they infl ict losses on both Ukrzaliznytsia and required capacity of the main sorting unit is determined on the wagon/freight owners, thus affecting train and wagon fl ows. The base of the forecasted average daily volume of operation, es- objective of the study is to analyze the infl uence of failures in sort- tablished by economic studies for calculated operation periods. ing facilities on their estimated capacity and to search for ways to Thus, the subject matter of the study is the scheduled break- minimize their negative impact. Methodology of the study is com- ing-up of freight trains on rail classifi cation facilities with their putational simulation and graphical interpretation of a 24-hour es- consequent making-up. The scope of the study is the support of timated capacity of the sorting hump and the lead track, the most capacity of the classifi cation facilities with the optimized techni- signifi cant parameters of which are weight average values, and cal equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 14 Yards and Terminals1
    CHAPTER 14 YARDS AND TERMINALS1 FOREWORD This chapter deals with the engineering and economic problems of location, design, construction and operation of yards and terminals used in railway service. Such problems are substantially the same whether railway's ownership and use is to be individual or joint. The location and arrangement of the yard or terminal as a whole should permit the most convenient and economical access to it of the tributary lines of railway, and the location, design and capacity of the several facilities or components within said yard or terminal should be such as to handle the tributary traffic expeditiously and economically and to serve the public and customer conveniently. In the design of new yards and terminals, the retention of existing railway routes and facilities may seem desirable from the standpoint of initial expenditure or first cost, but may prove to be extravagant from the standpoint of operating costs and efficiency. A true economic balance should be achieved, keeping in mind possible future trends and changes in traffic criteria, as to volume, intensity, direction and character. Although this chapter contemplates the establishment of entirely new facilities, the recommendations therein will apply equally in the rearrangement, modernization, enlargement or consolidation of existing yards and terminals and related facilities. Part 1, Generalities through Part 4, Specialized Freight Terminals include specific and detailed recommendations relative to the handling of freight, regardless of the type of commodity or merchandise, at the originating, intermediate and destination points. Part 5, Locomotive Facilities and Part 6, Passenger Facilities relate to locomotive and passenger facilities, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ten Commandments of Model Railroad Yard Design
    The Ten Commandments of Model Railroad Yard Design By Craig Bisgeier Sample Yard Layout You may find it helpful to print out this diagram before reading the article. Having a hard copy of the diagram to refer to as you are reading will probably be a big help for some of the more difficult concepts. This is definitely a case of a picture being worth a thousand words... One of the most often modeled -- and misunderstood -- layout design elements is the yard. Nearly everyone has one on their layout, whether it's used simply for car storage or as an actual operating tool. Unfortunately, many of them don't work very well. Common design mistakes are made over and over again by beginner and intermediate modelers. They can't be faulted, though, because the info on how to design a good yard is very hard to find. Even when the hobby press gets it right, it's short-lived, because if you missed the issue you didn't see it. Most of the time you see poor examples (like the hated Timesaver) which are often published by the hobby press without comment, and therefore accepted by those who do not know better as good design. So the "secrets" of good yard design are difficult to for most to uncover, because the good nuggets of information appear in wildly different places like out of print magazines or books, special interest publications, or even word of mouth among advanced modelers. not many modelers have that kind of library or access. What is needed is a repository where all the good ideas can be collected, stored, edited and presented as one all-encompassing primer on the subject.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Investigation Report on Train Derailment Incident at Hung Hom Station on MTR East Rail Line on 17 September 2019
    港鐵東鐵綫 紅磡站列車出軌事故 技術調查報告 Technical Investigation Report on Train Derailment Incident at Hung Hom Station on MTR East Rail Line 事故日期︰2019 年 9 月 17 日 Date of Incident : 17 September 2019 英文版 English Version 出版日期︰2020 年 3 月 3 日 Date of Issue: 3 March 2020 CONTENTS Page Executive Summary 2 1 Objective 3 2 Background of Incident 3 3 Technical Details Relating to Incident 4 4 Incident Investigation 8 5 EMSD’s Findings 19 6 Conclusions 22 7 Measures Taken after Incident 22 Appendix I – Photos of Wheel Flange Marks, Broken Rails, Rail Cracks and Damaged Point Machines On-Site 23 1 Executive Summary On 17 September 2019, a passenger train derailed while it was entering Platform No. 1 of Hung Hom Station of the East Rail Line (EAL). This report presents the results of the Electrical and Mechanical Services Department’s (EMSD) technical investigation into the causes of the incident. The investigation of EMSD revealed that the cause of the derailment was track gauge widening1. The sleepers2 at the incident location were found to have various issues including rotting and screw hole elongation, which reduced the strength of the sleepers and their ability to retain the rails in the correct position. The track gauge under dynamic loading of trains would be even wider, and this excessive gauge widening caused the train to derail at the time of incident. After the incident, MTR Corporation Limited (MTRCL) have reviewed the timber sleeper condition across the entire EAL route and replaced the sleepers of dissatisfactory condition. MTRCL were requested to enhance the maintenance regime to closely monitor the track conditions with reference to relevant trade practices to ensure railway safety.
    [Show full text]
  • IC Rebuilds Classification Yard
    I. C. Rebuilds Cla$sification Yard And Installs New System of Control trolled from four towers each of which· handled the retarders and switches in their corresponding areas. Within a few years after the The control of switches is automatic after being original yards at ~'larkham were initiated by push-button in panel at the crest placed in service, a new group ar­ rangement of tracks was developed of the hump, and all of the retarders are con­ for use in yards being installed on trolled by one man in a tower near main lead other roads, the object of which was to reduce the number of retarders, because one retarder on the lead to each group serves to apply final A NEW system of control for pow- the first yards to be equipped with retardation to cars routed to all of er switches and retarders has been car retarders of commercial manu­ the tracks in that group. installed by the Illinois Central in facture. Original installations were Having rendered 23 years service, its southbound classification yard at based on the ladder principle, with the retarders, switch machines, con­ :Markham Yards, located 20 mi. retarders down the hump and the trol machines and rail in the Illinois south of the passenger station at throat leads, as well as on the upper Central southbound yard were due Twelfth Street in Chicago. This end of each classification track. for replacement. A decision was southbound yard, as well as the The southbound yard with its 43 made that the replacement program northbound yard nearby, were built classification tracks, 43 power should include a change from the in 1926, and at that time they were switches, and 72 retarders was con- old ladder-track layout to the more Th~ man in the tower controls the retarders in the entire yard 346 R A I I, W A Y S I G N A l I N G cmd C 0 M M u· N I C A T I 0 N S June, 1950 modern grouping of tracks, as well as a change in grades.
    [Show full text]